[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: 2345675432.jpg (686 KB, 4205x1334)
686 KB
686 KB JPG
Why did GW abandon the uniqe biology of their elves in favour of going back to the most generic human with long ears look? I thought they wanted to make their IP more orginal instead of a cheap LotR rip off
>>
>>85544450
I know this is bait, but did you know that the tall, conical helmet isnt actually representative of the way their skull looks?
>>
>>85544450
Should never have gone away from the Tall Helmet look.
Replace the weird Barbute grecian whatever helmet with a proper pointy helmet, you'd fix that model right up.
>>
>>85544683
4th edition army book has a drawing of one without a helmet and he has a cone head with bit of hair on top
>>
File: conhead.jpg (49 KB, 753x681)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>85545395
yea, just look at that conehead!
>>
File: 1659797079983723.jpg (79 KB, 752x680)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
>>85545426
This one's a turnip



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.