[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: pepe-hmm.gif (81 KB, 220x220)
81 KB
81 KB GIF
I am a young mechanical engineer with about 8 months of work experience, and 4 with my current team (reorg happened soon after I joined).

Calculations on the job are often rushed (1-2 days lead time) and the specific literature of my specific industry was not taught in school. I give this as the reason why I am often finding my assumptions to be incorrect after reviewing them with my more experienced colleagues. I'd say I'm right about 60-70% of the time. Also my presentation skills are shit and it takes me about 2x the time to set one up when compared to another engineer. Actually, I'd say everything I do takes 2x the time if I want to do it accurately.

For reference I got a 4.0 GPA at a very reputable university.

I have to rely on them quite a bit to get things right. At this point, should I expect to get fired/laid off? I have not been trained much, and landed my new role 4 months ago.

Can anyone weigh in on this? What are the expectations for incoming engineers and how shitty am I lol.
>>
>>15754121
"specific literature of my specific industry:"
As you can see my brain is fried and my confidence is destroyed.
>>
>>15754121
Ask for more training. Don't sit there and struggle
>>
>>15754200
thanks anon, I will do this.
I honestly believe that another year or two of learning will lead me to be very proficient at my job.

In the meantime I am not able to accurately solve some of these problems without someone checking my assumptions.

It's odd to be this challenged when I did well in school, but it's still a good learning opportunity for me
>>
>>7734126
>Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.

>If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.
>>
>>15754121
>landed my new role 4 months ago.
They've spent 4 months training you, at this point they're incentivised to make it work out. If you were truly useless you would have been shown the door within the first two weeks.
>>
>>15754121
What type of engineering?
>>
>>15754121
Are you entry-level? Did you complete undergrad recently? If so, the expectations are rock-bottom. General incompetence is expected, especially from kids who did half of undergrad at Zoom University.
Just stay engaged and learn all you can. And take your ego out of it.>>15754121
>>
>>15754235
this is my first job out of college.
I have general competence, but yeah atm my pay is not justified by my output
>>
>>15754212
>It's odd to be this challenged when I did well in school
School is to make sure you know the fundamentals of your field. It does fuck-all to prepare you for industry.
Remember what K said to Will Smoth in Men in Black
>I need to tell you something about all your "skills"
>as of right now, they mean precisely dick
>>
>>15754246
>pay
Put that out of your mind. Engineers are paid shit compares to 30 years ago. You are likely being underpaid. Don't worry about your value.
>>
>>15754251
>take
>>15754235
>>15754225
>>15754200
Thanks everyone for the responses, and apologies for posting to the wrong board - I thought I'd have a better chance of getting opinions from other engineers on this board.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.