If genetics is a major contributor to athletic success of an ethnic population (sprinting, weightlifting, etc), why is it agreed upon that genetics cannot play a large role in IQ difference between ethnic populations? Sci/med anons, explain to my brainlet brain.
>>15465105because intelligence has shown itself to be more evenly distributed between different groups, and especially when you account for access to quality education and a proper family enviorment.either way, I'm sure you can train the stupidest nigger you can find to be good at any task, including advanced math, with enough time and willingness, whereas I don't think you're going to train and breed someone to beat usain bolt at the 100 m dash so easily.academic activities are more a matter of "getting used" to things. It's a matter of practice which can only occur when you like it. otherwise the concepts are inherently understandable to our primate brains (or so I think), and they are gatekept or they have added boilerplate or whatever by pompous language.when professor take the time to translate scientific talk into normal everyday language, most students end up understanding the concepts and doing fine in tests.either way having intelligence and applying it properly are 2 very different things, and often times you'll find dumber individuals who apply more and better than smarter ones
>>15465105>explain why I'm not superior to other races>I want to be superior
>>15465105>why is it agreed upon that genetics cannot play a large role in IQ difference between ethnic populations?It's not agreed upon, and studies have shown a huge correlation between genetics and IQ. What's generally agreed upon is that discussing it will get you into trouble.
>>15465142>because intelligence has shown itself to be more evenly distributed between different groupsThis level of brainwashing deeply fascinates me. Like, how many years does it take to make someone believe this unironically.
>>15465142>academic activities are more a matter of "getting used" to things. It's a matter of practice which can only occur when you like it. otherwise the concepts are inherently understandable to our primate brains (or so I think), and they are gatekept or they have added boilerplate or whatever by pompous language.>when professor take the time to translate scientific talk into normal everyday language, most students end up understanding the concepts and doing fine in tests.Complete drivel. I'm not sure I can even fathom being this retarded
>>15465253Best post in this thread
>>15465105> genetics> IQ> globohomo artstupid shill
>>15465105evolution stopped at the brain because of purely socioeconomic factors
IQ is a deeply unserious metric.There is almost no correlation between IQ and life success outside of the intellectually disabled.Unless you are an actual retard it mostly measures how good you are at doing tests.
genetics do play a large role in iq
>>15465630Why would there be a correletion? Money is not the life goal of everyone, especially not intelligent people.IQ is strongly correlated with things like academic achievement.
>>15465631no, shill, both are globohomo buzzwords.
>>15465639Yes your ability to do tests is highly correlates with your ability to do tests.
>spend decades trying to debunk and undermine IQ>can'tyoud think the deniers would eventually get tired
>>15465651undermine desire of losers to cope? no.
Evolutionary biology stops at the neck
>>15465651>There are people out there who would sterilise people based on this astounding correlation.Love to climb up entire quintile simply by doing a second IQ test.Very serious and objective measure of intelligence.
>>15465142>because intelligence has shown itself to be more evenly distributed between different groups>Also, Whites basically invented everything that matters in this history of the world because racism or something.
I've noticed an almost perfect correlation between stupid people and not believing in the objective reality of IQ.I've also noticed that fat women tend to think there shouldn't be any objective standards of beauty.
>>15465665you are not intelligent
>>15465630All this graph shows is that job pay levels don't correlate to intelligence. Which is pretty obvious.
>>15465672I have a tested IQ of 130, it's pseudoscience, I know for a fact that a large part of this score comes from basic exam techniques I used to slack off in school.Poltards use IQ tests given to illiterate 5ft tall Tanzanian copper miners as their evidence that they are the intellectually superior race, it's completely delusional and anyone who talks about the primacy of IQ in life outcome should be put into a blender.
>>15465690why do you deny objective reality
>>15465142>I'm sure you can train the stupidest nigger you can find to be good at any task, including advanced mathI am convinced otherwise.Pic related succeeded in building intelligent systems by sheer trial and error, and yet it's just a memory.A nigger who doesn't even use his memory is damned to stay a nigger, if it's also a zoomer nigger their attention span is less than 10 seconds before going apeshit, and you can't really train that to do things over and over again and systematically building an archive of reasonable solutions.
>>15465690>Sample size: N=1.Your math is blowing my mind.
>>15465672> I, I, Ishill. btw, only stupid people constantly use I, sign of narcissism
>>15465692> why do you deny objective strawman?strawmen are real. but strawmen, shill.
>>15465630>Unless you are an actual retard it mostly measures how good you are at doing tests.And how is solving real problems not related to solving test problems?
>>154652804 years of college usually.
>>15465690>those basic exam techniques that magically increase your raw reaction time>those basic exam techniques that magically increase your working memory>those basic exam techniques that magically increase your ability to spatially manipulate objectsWhy are you lying?
