[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
I laught at your eternal cope. 08/05/22(Fri)20:40:38 No.14732617
File: maxresdefault.jpg (113 KB, 1280x720)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
I laught at your eternal cope. Anonymous 08/05/22(Fri)20:40:38 No.14732617 Archived
Nobody here can refute the fine tuned hypothesis.
>>
Anonymous
08/05/22(Fri)20:45:39 No.14732622
Anonymous 08/05/22(Fri)20:45:39 No.14732622
>>14732617
anthropic principle. of course there can be many universes that are empty or boring or too chaotic, but the special few that happen to evolve galactic structures and solar systems with habitable planetary systems and advanced life will obviously look special because unless they were special nobody would evolve in them to appreciate their specialness
>>
Anonymous
08/06/22(Sat)01:48:57 No.14733107
Anonymous 08/06/22(Sat)01:48:57 No.14733107
>>14732617
Fine tuning is derived from classical assumptions, but our universe is nonclassical, so fine tuning has unsound justification. Deboonked.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.