It is unacceptable that the gov get access/knows about this tech and is not letting the public know. These UFOs can go from sea level to 70k feet in 1 second!!! Think about the benefit that could have for humanity! LET'S DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!
>>14480718glare off the camera mechanismhttps://boingboing.net/2022/03/14/navy-ufo-moves-with-camera-mechanisms-in-glaring-problem-for-alien-fans.html>>UFOs can go from sea level to 70k feet in 1 seconda laser pointer dot can appear to go at extreme speeds too.
Just shot it mutt, bg sniper rifle should do. Then take the aliums and put dildos up their arsehole so they dont come back.
>>14480756>We became so retarded with tech made by prev generation that we get fooled by sun flare and make drama with claims it wasnt russia or china.Idiocracy begun
>>14480718I WILL NOT EAT THE BLUE BEANSI WILL NOT EAT THE BLUE BEANSI WILL NOT EAT THE BLUE BEANSI WILL NOT EAT THE BLUE BEANSI WILL NOT EAT THE BLUE BEANS
>wants to have access to all parts of the universeYou can't do that with who you are right now. It's too dangerous to see everything and know it exists. The only way to earn more responsibilities than a limited life can act aware of you need to value your life more than wanting petty desires. That's the harsh truth no one can easily explain enough of what else it means, because if you have cleared all thoughts possible your mind by seeing everything, you can use and have wisdom about them, and you perceive more places than what exist in actuality.
>>14480718>These UFOs can go from sea level to 70k feet in 1 second!!! Now with that kind of power, imagine using it to negate the gravitation of water and make it rise 70k feet a second! Think about the benefit that could have for humanity! LET'S DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!
>>14480839just imagine, you could piss 10 feet in the air AND NOT GET WET!
>>14480756>boingboing.net> Pescovitz, Frauenfelderlisten to the jews that'll get you far
>>14480756do the tracking indicators on the screen follow the movement of the object on screen or its showing the radar measurements
>>14480718>These UFOs can go from sea level to 70k feet in 1 second!!!Proof?By the way, your image just shows glare rotating due to internal camera rotation, probably from a net engine. Nothing special.
Real UFOs aren't saucer shaped, those are a myth, all the real military encounters with UFOs they were almost all ball shaped and solid. These tic and tok ufos are probably real too as they were all solid with no windows or rivets, most credible cases were either ball, oval or cylindrical. Even in Europe quite a few cases in the 70's with these strange objects like these that would shutdown all of the plane's control until the object got away.There are quite a few interesting cases out there, the Iranian one is one of the best too and so is the Japan Air Lines Cargo Flight 1628 case, that one is the best imo.
They aren't vehicles.Real ones crash landed before and there was nobody inside.The government doesn't know what it is or how it can move like it does.It's radioactive and unmanned, like a drone. The technology is not understood since there is nothing inside. They are just empty pods that are seen flying around for seemingly no reason. The emit nuclear radiation and hang around nuclear areas.One time one of them flew past a nuclear missile base and the missile started to launch spontaneously but once the UFO left the area the launch sequence deactivated.The UFOs have killed about 30 people in total simply by flying past them the radiation kills them if they get too close to it.The US government only has possession of three. They range in size from the size of a computer to the size of a jet and are completely empty, unexplainable objects.
>>14480718Is any of the secureteam shit real? posting from bed sry for low IQ bost
>>14482442LOL, "real UFO" is meaningless. Some UFOs are sauce shaped because that's what people report. UFOs aren't a single thing, they are many different things that we don't have enough information to identify. That doesn't mean they are extraordinary. An unidentified balloon is a UFO.
>>14482454>Source: my ass
>>14482849We all know the définition of an UFO, military wise, old cases there's none that is a disk shape craft.
Explain this then, denialfags.
>>14482870There are many, such as the image in the OP, Roswell, Topcliffe sighting, RAF Tangmere sighting, etc. And why are you limiting it to military sightings? Only military sightings are "real?"
>>14482882Religious iconography. The same artist put similar things in other paintings representing miraculous signs: https://www.domenico-ghirlandaio.org/Meeting-Of-Augustus-And-The-Sibyl-C.-1485.html
>>14480718>grainy blurry footage they just "released" to the publicIt's not real. These are not UFOs, this is simple CGI and a grainy low resolution filter and actors poorly acting like dude wtf! They release it for gullible idiots like you so you aren't concerned over real issues like getting raped on taxes, or being paid peanuts. You're a smoothbrain and deserve to suffer.
It's just a 3D laser pointer
>>14483007>this is simple CGIProof?
>>14482943Military was just an example because of radar data and witnesses.Roswell I don't think it holds to scrutiny.The flying saucers was a misprint, Kennett said it was a wing shape craft that was flying like a saucer skipping on water.
>>14483107>Military was just an example because of radar data and witnesses.Then they are thousands of saucer shaped UFOs.>Roswell I don't think it holds to scrutiny.Others certainly would not hold up to scrutiny if we had more information. >The flying saucers was a misprint, Kennett said it was a wing shape craft that was flying like a saucer skipping on water.Which just makes it even more obvious that UFO reports are culturally interpreted.
>>14480756>>14480766>>14482332The developer of the camera said it can't produce that from glare and the operator would be well aware of what that looks like. This article and video is baseless deboonking nonsense. Anyone can create a model to get the conclusion they like. It's not real life. Real life is simply that no one knows. These were not isolated incidents either.
>>14482454>travels lightyears in such ways humans have no idea how to even comprehend>always make it to earth, malfunction, and crash land in a field in nebraska or desert in new mexico where not a single person can see it, and the govt gets to it first>never crashes in the other 99.9% of land on earth, never where millions of people can see ithonestly the stupidest take when it comes to UFOs. kys.
>>14483777>The developer of the camera said it can't produce that from glare and the operator would be well aware of what that looks like.Source? The glare rotates exactly with artifacts in the background, so it must be a camera effect. Your developer doesn't exist or is being misrepresented.
>>14483795It may be intentional, same way we have birds showing we can fly, we may have these objects showing what we can do next.
>>14483835The glare argument if futile at the end of the day, they have more video and then trim it right when things got interesting?
>>14484854So no source. Nothing got interesting, it's just glare from a jet that confused the pilots because specific features of the gimbal system made it look abnormal. That's why the video is named GIMBAL.
>>14485277This object then went to formation with the rest of the fleet offscreen, the video got chopped. I'm not invested in this subject but you can find more info like here:https://youtu.be/kZyNMqcpFm8
>>14480756If this is your argument at this point in the conversation you need to leave.
>>14485551If this is your argument at this point in the conversation you need to leave.
>>14485494>This object then went to formation with the rest of the fleet offscreen, the video got chopped.That's not what Ryan Graves said. He said he saw a higher resolution video with other, smaller objects in formation before the public part of the video. He also doesn't even consider that the object could be rotating glare and assumes that it's showing a real wing profile. It's laughable and further confirms that pilots' first impressions are not authoritative.
>>14485575The public video is just a tiny fraction, that's what I was saying, this glare debate would be over if they released more of the video, just a few more seconds and it would be obvious if it was glare or not but they want to leave us guessing.
>>14485706>The public video is just a tiny fraction, that's what I was sayingA tiny fraction of nothing is still nothing.>this glare debate would be over if they released more of the videoNot really. According to Graves the other part of the video just shows some other objects. It doesn't change the fact that the larger object is glare that rotates with camera artifacts in the background, and the pilots completely missed this.