[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


what did evolution (not god) mean by this ?
>>
>>14466653
eat dick faggot
>>
that's the vagina seal that occurs when your body finds out your genes are XY, eedeeot
>>
>>14466666
test
>>
>>14466653
It's an extension of the linea nigra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linea_nigra
>>
>be penile raphe
>useless, almost invisible, do not cause even the slightest inconvinience
>exist
>>
>>14466653
Can't shit without pissing, obviously.
Could have caused some kind of rupture in some of our ancestors. In order to know which ancestor, we'd need to start analyzing mammals and see if they have similar features.
>>
>>14466686
>>useless, almost invisible,

Its visibility is dependent on female hormones
>>
containment thread
>>
>>14466653
That males are basically females
>>14466728
>female hormones
No such thing
>>
>>14466653
Stupid Abrahamic religions say their god made man first but everyone started out with a female foundation.
Maybe their god is female or the dummies got it back to front.
>>
>>14466883
but women cause are the beginning of temptation as they took the fruit from the forbidden tree. adam is the first simp.
>>
>>14466653

Things are not always what they appear to be.
>>
>>14466653
Thanks, now I want to rewatch gay porn
>>
>>14466653
I feel bad for mutilated men, you can infer how much damage was dealt to their organ by how misaligned their raphe line is to their frenulum remnant
>>
>>14466653
what's the issue? plenty of things embryologically fuse at midline and/or have some remnant that's not particularly functional.
>>
File: fumunda.gif (3.98 MB, 600x600)
3.98 MB
3.98 MB GIF
>>14466653
It's like a irrigation ditch to fertilize your taint and balls with foul emulsions and I believe signal to other females that you've been fucking. I've been with women. Washed up and the next day gotten mud butt and it smelled like I had just had sex. I got pretty obsessive with hygiene but still smells like I've been fucking when I get a sweaty coin purse within 24 hours of taking the skin boat out. Maybe I'm just weird.
>>
>>14467189
Explain
>>
>>14467768
What do you mean "explain"?
It's self-explanatory.
Most cut men have their raphe line misaligned to where their frenulum would be, it can be skewed to the left or right, this changes depending on the method used to mutilate the penis, how much inner mucosa was cut off, etc.
>>
>>14466653
That’s the trace you make with your tongue when rimming an twink
>>
>>14467804
if you're British
I usually take the right turn
>>
>>14466883
Adam and Eve did not have belly buttons you mouth breather. They didn't "started out" the same way as other humans.
>>
>>14466883
“During early development the gonads of the fetus remain undifferentiated; that is, all fetal genitalia are the same and are phenotypically female.”
>>
>>14466883
are you fucking retarded?
Male/female has to do with your chromosomes not the short transistory stage of an devoloping fetus. The fetus doesnt even have a gender at that point. As the other anon pointed out, adam and eve werent fetusus so your point is null.
>>
f*moids
>>
Test
>>
File: 1524596705759.jpg (108 KB, 1000x1000)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
>>14466671
So, you're saying that vaginas are undeveloped dick and balls? This confirms that men are fully developed superior creatures and women are undeveloped inferior creatures.
>>
File: 1652121333626.png (1.11 MB, 1558x1058)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB PNG
>>14469420
Correct, and clitoris is actually micro peepee. So yes, even if you manage to engage in coitus with the opposite sex, your still a faggot
>>
>>14469420
you're unironically in hell, retard. wanting to be "fully developed" here, in a world that runs on satanic rules = wanting to be a demon. you can post smug frogs all day long, your attempts to find salvation through manly behavior will only result in frustration, pain and utter humiliation. without fault.
>>
>>14469420
>>14469914
gonads and ovaries are theoretically the same organ just m/f counterpart.
>>
>>14471081
Well they originate from the same fetal structures
>>
>>14471081
ovaries are gonads you dumb nigger not a second name for testes
>>
>>14466653
I dont have a penile raphe.
>>
>>14467826
Adam and Eve did have belly buttons, they were made complete. They also had nails.

>>14469420
>Haha! That means boys are better than stupid girls!
Grow up faggot
>>
>>14472442
literally impossible unless you have a bagina
>>
>>14467804
That's hot
>>
>>14472459
>Adam and Eve did have belly buttons, they were made complete
"being complete" has absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with the scar tissue that forms from the umbilical cord during fetal development in the womb. Adam/Eve did not have this scar tissue there because they were made outside of a womb. Simple as.
>>
>>14466883
yep, man are the improved form of humans, thats why they have a special chromosome
>>
File: 1622053986228.png (120 KB, 446x470)
120 KB
120 KB PNG
>have a line there that's skin coloured, maybe a bit darker on my scrotum because my scrotum is just naturally darker
>start taking HRT and apply estradiol gel to my scrotum
>within a year the line has darkened a lot, almost dark purplish
>the line has started growing skin flaps from the back of my scrotum but especially on my penis, had skin there before but it's grown so much more now
Kind of funny desu
I assume it's something benign, I was worried that it might have been diabetes because there's a patch of skin that's darkened there (Acanthosis Nigricans) as well on my scrotum but I got tested for diabetes and I'm fine
>>
>>14469914
life truly is a zero-sum game
>>
When I was 12 I used to think it was normal to have this. Then I started watching porn and started to think something was wrong with me, ended up having nightmares about aliens performing surgery on me. We've gone full circle.
>>
>>14473183
oof, glad i got my diagnosis of psychosis at 9
>>
>>14466883
>hurr abrahamic religion bad
>muh female foundation
spoken like a true soiboi i fucking love science feminist
your body is androgynous before developing secondary sex characteristics. you are not "female" if you are born with XY chromosomes. both male and female develop from the same thing and that thing is not "female".
>>
>>14473168
Stop taking hrt immediately
>>
>>14473228
What's in it for me?
>>
>>14473168
You will never be a woman
>>
>>14473183
>ended up having nightmares about aliens performing surgery on me
might as well have been if you're circumcised
>>
>>14466653
That's what's known as the tongue line
>>
>>14470124
classic religion faggot, kek.
>>
>>14472459
"grow up" proceeds to ramble about a fucking 2000 year old book written by a fucking schizoid jew

cope autist.
>>
>>14466883
>genetically you can only extract a women from man since women lacks Y but man has X
>old world knowledge of genetics hidden in fan fiction someone wrote after reset tunguska or whatever
most interesting take on it, there is an official term for this "hiding real knowledge in occult text" but it escapes me now
>>
>your body is androgynous before developing secondary sex characteristics
I assume you meant primary
>>
>>14474992
>>genetically you can only extract a women from man since women lacks Y but man has X
thats wrong though, you can only get a man from a man
>>
>>14475004
thats the point

women from man is possible as men includes whole female genome
man from women isnt possible

if you know genetics it makes sense you write woman was made from men not reverse

if you were some clueless tribe you would know women give birth so you should go men from woman normally
>>
It's the line you cut and turn inside out when you transition. God stuck it there for convenience.
>>
>>14475017
ah I see the problem. your level of english makes you nigh incomprehensible
>>
>>14470124
Hell is the void, heaven is the singularity. The cosmos is just a divine play, and quite literally 99% has to do with sex. Existence is a fucking joke.
>>
>>14473238
Do you want to get fucked in the ass by random men? Why feminine yourself in the first place?
>>
>>14467475
The curse of having a high sex drive. Transmutation that shit.
>>
>>14474980
Imagine being so dumb you think the Bible was written by one person.... and then double that for thinking it was written 2k years ago instead of over a time period of a millennia culminating in the first century AD.
>>
>>14475069
Well no, not by random men
>Why feminine yourself in the first place?
I wanted to castrate myself in order to end any chance of my father's bloodline to continue
Also I wanted my libido to die and to stop balding
Taking HRT is a very fun gimmick ngl
>>
>>14470124
MEDS motherfucker
is it so hard to find them???
>>
>>14466883
get your facts straight, first female was lilith, she was made like adam but refused to submit to his will and left eden, then yahweh made eve from adam's rib so she would be more dependent

what's with the atheists of today that don't know simple facts
>>
>>14475309
>has penis/scrotum line
>father's bloodline is shit and doesn't deserve to be continued
>extremely high libido and balding
are you me? i never fell for the tranny meme though, i like everything to stay functional and stick to fin.
>>
It's the seam from the mold God used to make Adam
>>
File: 26-Figure1.1-1.png (269 KB, 642x1216)
269 KB
269 KB PNG
>>14476049
>It's the seam
Yes, but not of what you think.
>>
>>14466653
That is not a correct image of male genitalia since it is missing foreskin.
>>
>>14466739
>That males are basically females
For humans. For birds i think it's males at the base
>>
>>14466653
You are reinforced at the seam so you don't accidentally reap yourself apart.
>>
>>14473168
Wtf is this Cronenberg shit
>>
>>14466653
That since the scrotal raphe period the anus has become less stochastic and that it has been steadily increasing since the perineal raphe
>>
Aliens.
>>
File: finetouch.jpg (50 KB, 474x557)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>14476469
it's not mutilated, the frenulum is still intact there in that diagram
The raphe line doesn't go up to the glans in mutilated men, it's usually misaligned

It's either erect, or the drawing is disingenuous
>>
>>14477220
If someone cuts more than half of the skin from your penis then it is certainly mutilated. It does not matter what kind of cope you come up with.
See >>14467189
>>
>>14477404
Reading comprehension you fucking retard
>>
>>14477410
fuck off kike
>>
>>14477220
>raphe line
sorry now I get it
>>
>>14466680
>linea nigga
>>
>>14467189
Your insecurity and cope is hilarious given the fact women prefer circumcised penises and you know that
>>
>>14478024
I'm circumcised you gaylord, I don't care what women think of my penis, I'd rather not be mutilated
>>
>>14478024
>id cut my penis to make retarded wamen happy
the ultimate simp
>>
>>14478024
>the guy who still has a choice is coping, not me, the guy who had his choice taken away on day one
>>
>>14466653
God is all-encompassing by nature, so evolution is a facet of God as all things are.
>>
File: Screenshot_15.jpg (17 KB, 365x203)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>14466653

>just do it
>>
>>14469914
>clitoris is actually micro peepee
Cute. So when a penis and clitoris are rubbing against each other it's basically like two peepees rubbing each other?
>even if you manage to engage in coitus with the opposite sex, your still a faggot
Not if you say "no homo" haha
>>
>>14478028
>I don't care what women think of my penis
The words of an incel with a tiny penis
>>14478120
No, I wouldn't bother if I wasn't, but it's sure is nice knowing my penis is preferable to your ugly eggroll
>>14478326
>I-I-I-I'll show him by pretending it's about c-c-c-choice!
>still pretends women don't prefer my penis
You can invent ridiculous excuses to direct away from your insecurity but you can't change facts
>>
File: 1652405957415.jpg (92 KB, 1189x727)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>14480431
>doesn't like being mutilated, must have a tiny penis
what the fuck is this cope? why would you sacrifice most of the feeling in your dick to appeal to (((American))) women?
Go to anywhere in Europe or Asia and they'll fucking freak out and act like you're a burn victim
>>
>>14480431
brain damage caused by circumcision is definitely real
>>
>>14466653
I used to feel my scrotal raphe as a little kid and thought it meant I was an alien or something
>>
>>14480657
this is what christianity does to kids
>>
>>14480789
Autism was more likely the cause.
>>
>>14480436
>sex is about my feelings!!
>me me me me!
You couldn't be more obviously an incel and sound like a woman. Have sex
>Go to anywhere in Europe or Asia and they'll fucking freak out and act like you're a burn victim
HAHAHAHA! The absolute cope. Women prefer circumcised penises because they literally look better and thanks to porn they all know what they look like, and prefer circumcised. You thinking their reaction would be akin to reacting to a "burn victim" is abject proof of your insecurity-based denial and lack of interacting with women.
>>14480607
>In the overwhelming majority of studies, women expressed a preference for the circumcised penis. The main reasons given for this preference were better appearance, better hygiene, reduced risk of infection, and enhanced sexual activity, including vaginal intercourse, manual stimulation, and fellatio
Direct away from your tiny ugly smelly eggroll looking chinkdick all you want
>>
File: 1651331448493.png (170 KB, 382x346)
170 KB
170 KB PNG
>>14481508
>unironic cuckpost
sasuga /sci/

Also, no you retard, I know from experience. Women that are used to normal penises freak out when they see a mutilated dick. They don't know what to do with it because the moving part is missing.
They also act like it's fragile and weak, like it'll be more damaged if they touch it the wrong way.
Why do people act so angry when they are told the basic truth?

Also,
>citing Brian J Morris "survey" paper
>data taken from ((((1950s and 1970s America))))
You cannot be serious KEK
Also, according to this logic, 70% of the world, which is not mutilated, has women detest penises.
What the fuck is this cope?
>>
File: file.png (569 KB, 960x910)
569 KB
569 KB PNG
>>14481508
>because they literally look better
I don't get this meme. how does it look better?
It's literally scarred and it looks like it's been through a meat grinder. Even the circumcision scar makes me uneasy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_scar
>>
>>14475315
he has already found his meds. It is you who is in need of a cure
>>
>>14481557
>Also, no you retard, I know from experience
You are a virgin
>They also act like it's fragile and weak, like it'll be more damaged if they touch it the wrong way.
ROFL are you seriously dumb enough to think anybody would believe this obviously made up lie? I mean, how would you even possess this knowlege? Did some woman (in your case prostitute since that would be the only sexual interaction you've ever had) tell you how she feels when playing with other guy's dicks? Please make up a number of fictional women who have told you this so I can laugh at you more.
>Why do people act so angry when they are told the basic truth?
Your projection is off the charts. Women prefer circumcised penises and this makes you angry.
>>data taken from ((((1950s and 1970s America))))
>You cannot be serious KEK
Are you huffing paint? The study is from 2019 and takes data sources going back to 1970s to 2015 and the data is consistent you mouth breather. 2015 is Canadian preferences and circumcised preference is overwhelming as expected. Nobody cares about womens's preferences from whatever brown shithole country you come from.
>Also, according to this logic, 70% of the world, which is not mutilated, has women detest penises.
No you troglodyte shrimpdick ape. It just means they are less preferable, less preferable does not mean detestable.

>>14481583
>I'm a straight male, I don't understand what male anatomy is attractive to women
The first time you ever speak with a woman why don't you just ask her why women think they look better instead of staring at dicks all day trying to guess?
>>
>>14467826
Why couldn't they have belly buttons if they were sculpted by an artist?
>>
>>14473168
Lol
Cut off your balls to protect the species from your deformity.
>>
>>14479919
>Not circling the clit with foreskin overhang
>>
>>14482138
Why would God confuse them and make a false indication that they developed in the womb? Likewise future generations would see belly buttons and think that they were liars if they claimed God crafted them into being without having physical parents. They lived hundreds of years remember?
>>
>>14482264
Why wouldn't God form them how he wanted? Literally doesn't matter if Adam or Eve looked anything like modern humans because we're fallen through sin.

The only big thing is Adam was made in God's own image, whatever that means.
>>
>>14482286
>Why wouldn't God form them how he wanted?
He did
>Literally doesn't matter if Adam or Eve looked anything like modern humans because we're fallen through sin.
Does not follow. The wages of sin is death, not transmogrification into a different species. The only ways were are different than Adam and Eve is natural decay of the human genome. I predict in 100k years humanity would go sterile from all the mutation defects circulating in the genepool. It's hilarious evolutiontards think life can just fix itself.
>The only big thing is Adam was made in God's own image, whatever that means
God is not the author of confusion so in making man in his own image we know he also took that into account such as by not confusingly giving humans belly buttons for no reason.
>>
File: 1652366728047.gif (1.98 MB, 400x213)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB GIF
>>14481855
>preferences from America and Canada
>applies to the rest of the world for some bizarre reason
>data from 1970's is relevant
Braindamage from MGM really is real.
The fact that you even imply women don't "prefer" normal dicks in civilised countries because of outdated data from your North American shitholes is absurd.
Also, Brian J Morris is a pedophile jew that masturbates to fantasies of kids forcefully getting circumcised. Look up Gilgal Society, and look at his academic history. That 2019 study is on the same grounds as junk-publishing.
Again, what the fuck kind of cope is this?

Also I know from experience because I am an unfortunate muslim in Europe. I probably get more pussy than you do. Women fucking detest scarred dicks and it's not even close.
And personally, I find them fucking disgusting as well. I have to search through what's hot in PornHub for civilised countries instead of Canada or America because they mostly show intact penises instead of mutilated scars
It's interesting because I really want to understand what drives a person to defend his damaged organ to the point of delusion
>>
>>14482898
>>preferences from America and Canada
Of course. Nowhere else matters you silly shrimpdick
>applies to the rest of the world for some bizarre reason
Same
>>data from 1970's is relevant
Are you being this stupid on purpose? It has data ranging from the 70's to 2015. Data from 70s absolutely is still relevant. Did you realize circumcision also occured during that time or has too much oxygen been cut off from your brain?
>Braindamage from MGM really is real.
I didn't even read the rest of your shit post you fully demonstrated you are a coping retard just from greentext
>>
File: 1652059217457.gif (495 KB, 220x231)
495 KB
495 KB GIF
>>14483098
>nowhere other than my cutting culture matters
the absolute state lol
Also, how am I coping? I get shit from women for being circumcised. You are coping because your dick isn't normal, you handwaved an image comparing its disfigured appearance as "lol fag"

Also, no, it doesn't.
The US: They go straight to the Midwest which is the epicenter of circumcision. To look at it more, this is a study from 1988. Keep in mind the respondents would be born well before that, likely born in the 1958-1968 range at the youngest.

Then the next study in Massachusetts found the opposite. A countering study right in the US. “Participants gave circumcised men an overall rating for sexual activity of 1.8/10 compared with 8.0/10 for uncircumcised men.”

Canada: Same thing, it used to be common and there’s lots of regionality. This was in Ontario, a location with higher rate. And the population they studied had a lot of older generation. The study date and ages given puts the women surveyed being born between 1944-1996, average of 1970. So regionality bias and age bias. And the study isn't all that either, it even says: “women with intact partners reported higher levels of sexual satisfaction … Women's responses indicated that circumcision status minimally impacted satisfaction with partner's genitals”, which I think says plenty, Morris is trying to play it up.

Australia: A 1989 study. The date study and ages puts most of the women surveyed being born between 1949-1969, average of 1959.

Denmark: They try to get out of this study by ignoring the author’s response to them:
“Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark”

1/2
>>
File: 1650793435353.gif (3.82 MB, 521x421)
3.82 MB
3.82 MB GIF
>>14483098
>>14483138
"Results: Circumcised men...were more likely to report frequent orgasm difficulties after adjustment for potential confounding factors, and women with circumcised spouses more often reported incomplete sexual needs fulfilment and frequent sexual function difficulties overall, notably orgasm difficulties and dyspareunia."
“Conclusion: Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted.’
Then the tour through Africa begins: Botswana, South Africa, Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia, Uganda, and “Multiple Sub-Saharan African Countries”. Circumcision is popular there for religion or quasi-religion, tradition, coming of age, culture, or for HIV reasons. This is not good information, and certainly not for the West.

Looking at how few countries there are, the weakness of the studies to support Morris's conclusion, the countering studies right in the paper, the regionality bias, the generational bias and social norms at that time, the issues relating that to newborns today, and the huge reliance on Africa,
the study is fucking junk

TL;DR Cope harder. I never would've imagined someone on 4chan(nel) to defend a kike's studies and a kike's practice meant to cripple your sexuality.
And let alone accept this as "sacrifice" for American women's preferences. Unironic cuckposts all around
>>
>>14483138
>>14483152
>posts two effortpost responses in 11 minutes...
Did you have these posts saved waiting for me?
You are truly insane. I thought it was just funny how insecure you are over your gross eggroll dick but this is next level. You need mental help.
>the study is fucking junk
HAHA okay mr closeted homosexual dick expert who lies about having sex with women. In that case, please provide a study that shows women prefer uncircumcised dicks. Obviously, by your standards you can't use any study within Morris' paper otherwise you are a cherry picking hypocrite because you think those studies don't count for various bullshit non reasons.

I'll wait.....
>>
File: 1651331066328.gif (1.32 MB, 220x220)
1.32 MB
1.32 MB GIF
>>14483195
>egroll
if I was intact I wouldn't bother arguing about this you fucking mouthbreather. I only care about this because I was mutilated at birth and I abhor people defending their injury to protect their fragile ego. It's the ultimate cope and it's pathetic
>please provide a study that shows women prefer uncircumcised dicks
>>please provide a study that shows women prefer normal dicks
Do you want a study showing men like uncircumcised vulvas as well, Jamal?
Are you fucking stupid?

Even if I take your shit bait, the counter evidence in that kike's paper supports it nonetheless. Especially the "sexual satisfaction" studies, and the sexual difficulties of cut men.
>>
>>14481508
>muh wamen
>again
my body my rules
>>
>>14478024
women can't tell the different generally but when they realise the difference they much prefer unmutilated in the same way that people prefer non-amputees.
>>
>>14477539
>kike
is this ironic? you've been marked as a kikeslave
>>
>>14466653
Define "evolution."
>>
>>14483220
>I only care about this because I was mutilated at birth and I abhor people defending their injury to protect their fragile ego. It's the ultimate cope and it's pathetic
No, you have a small, ugly, brown penis and likely a botched circumcision and hate the way it looks so you pretend all circumcision is bad. Women love the way circumcised pensis look. You've provided no evidence that says otherwise.
>Do you want a study showing men like uncircumcised vulvas as well, Jamal?
>Are you fucking stupid?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ok so you can't provide any data or evidence that women prefer uncircumcised penises aside from your lies that you have sex and women tell you what they think about other men's dicks.

Thanks for saying I'm right shrimpdick. The data is on my side, I win.

>Even if I take your shit bait
You went full autism with the last post so yeah, you aren't posting data because it doesn't exist. Women prefer circumcised men.

>the counter evidence in that kike's paper supports it nonetheless
HAHAHA I even told you not to be a cherry picking hypocrite but you coudlnt' resist. The "counterevidence" is from the 1970's so it doesn't count by your standards. It doens't support it anyway, the "counterevidence" is vastly vastly outweighed by the evidence/fact women prefer cut penises.

>Especially the "sexual satisfaction" studies, and the sexual difficulties of cut men.
The majority of studies said those were not issues and actually worse in circumcised men, why do you cherry pick in a study you already threw out over bullshit reasons???

You are truly pathetic. Thanks for saying I'm right yet again.
I'm only resonding because of how hilarious this is, you are repsonding because you are angry and it's hilarious.
>>
>>14483762
Stop pretending you are a different person who disagrees with me shrimpdick
>>
File: 1652491222692.png (222 KB, 352x480)
222 KB
222 KB PNG
>>14484604
Data? You have no data.
Oh, now I am botched apparently. No, I am not. I even was spared a huge portion of my frenulum, and I was cut "loose". I'm more well off than most mutilated men.
I was an "eggroll" and a "shrimpdick", now I am "botched" apparently. What's your next cope?
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
This is what seething sounds like, do it more please
>You have no data for women liking uncircumcised dicks
I don't need to. It's the default state. Again, it's like telling you to provide me data for if men like uncircumcised vulvas, it doesn't fucking make sense.
And even if you want data so fucking badly, it's in the kike study your copepost mentioned.

>Women prefer circumcised men.
And your source is from a fetishist kike who got his outdated data from (((America))), the current hub for genital mutilation and brain damage.
>why do you cherry pick in a study you already threw out over bullshit reasons???
??? I pointed out the counterevidence, not your outdated kikeshit, and that paper I'm pointing you towards is not from the 1970s. You are falling over on your own words. Also, the reason I disregarded it is not for "bullshit" reasons either, read my post more carefully, and spend some time actually reading what you are citing.
>The majority of studies said those were not issues and actually worse in circumcised men
? Thanks for telling me I'm right, I guess

>you are repsonding because you are angry and it's hilarious.
Anon, you've been "laughing" and coping about how women prefer your scarred dicks like some unhinged schizo for the entire day.

You will never feel the same sensations as the rest of the civilised world, you will never feel anything remotely similar to what 70% of the world takes for granted, you've been branded as cattle by your parents.

And you cope with it by saying American women prefer it. And you don't get the sheer cuckholdery from this sentiment, which is what is most amusing to me
>>
>>14484604
Here's a direct link to the studies I was talking about if searching it is too much of a hassle for you by the results and conclusions. And I doubt you'd want to search through pages of studies going against your narrative either
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21672947/
https://www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cjhs.242-A2

Also, use 4chanx, not being able to see IPs and incorrectly calling out samefagging is hilarious
>>
imagine supporting cutting skin off a baby's penis
>>
>>14469420
literally yes, uo until a certain week both male and female fetuses are the exactly the same, that's why makes also have milk ducts and nipples.
>>
the pussy is just an inverted dick
>>
File: Screenshot_17.jpg (21 KB, 349x282)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>14479599

yes that's better, don't resist too long tho you miss all of the fun
>>
>>14466680
The nigger line goes straight into the asshole.
>>
>>14484655
>Data? You have no data.
HAHAHA Yes I do I posted it, you are just in complete denial
>>You have no data for women liking uncircumcised dicks
>I don't need to.
HAHAHAHA! You cannot provide any because it's not true and you are in denial about it
>And your source is from a fetishist kike who got his outdated data from (((America))),
It's not outdated, it is as current as 2015, and even if it was 100 years old there is no reason the preference would change.
>I pointed out the counterevidence
You pointed it out by cherry picking since you reject the rest. You can't use it to point something out if you reject it. And the evidence for overwhelms the counter evidence against.
>It's the default state
Why are you in such denial? The data shows it's not the default state. In areas where circumcision is uncommon the data still shows a preference for uncircumcised, hence it's not the default and you are just coping.
>And your source is from a fetishist kike
No, he compiled the data from other sources you retard.
>got his outdated data from (((America))), the current hub for genital mutilation and brain damage
It's not "his" data you mouth breathing retard.
It's not oudated
It also showed data from other countries were circumicsion is not the norm and yet the trend remained
You've lost on all points
> and that paper I'm pointing you towards is not from the 1970s.
HAHAHA the paper from 2015 says women like cirumcised. You can't have it both ways
>Thanks for telling me I'm right
Oooops I meant uncircumcised. Im seriously not giving much effort here since your posts are such mental vomit. I write these in like 5 min each

>Anon, youve been laughing
You are obviously a closeted homosexual. You verbatim admitted you look for porn that has penises you find visually appealing and you're lying about ever having sex with women. This comment chain is the most hilarious I've seen in a long time. I'm definitely laughing at you and so is everyone else.

You lost, give up.
>>
>>14484670
>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21672947/
Already mentioned in the kike study so it doesn't count by your standards
>https://www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cjhs.242-A2
>online study
>20% of the sample were faggots like you describing how much they love cock
>"Women indicated a slight preference for circumcised penises for vaginal intercourse and fellatio, and held more positive beliefs about circumcised penises"
You are so impossibly stupid you post a source that verbatim agrees with me ROFL

stop eating lead paint chips, you are already retarded enough as it is
>>
File: 1571984901266.jpg (13 KB, 225x225)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
>>14484670
>men indicated a strong preference toward intact penises for all sexual activities assessed and held more positive beliefs about intact penises
See anon? You are a closeted homosexual like I said. It's ok. The reason you are so obsessed with circumcised penises is because you know your future gay lovers prefer uncut, however, women prefer cut. It all makes sense now why you are so angry, frustrated, coping, obsessed with penises, and in complete denial.

It will be ok, find yourself a nice boyfriend with a nice uncut penis the way you like it (It will probably glide in and out of your rectum which is why faggots like you prefer that) who accepts your circumcised yet still ugly shrimpdick the way it is and you will probably stop caring about circumcision and realize you were wrong about it all along.
>>
>>14484670
>Also, use 4chanx, not being able to see IPs and incorrectly calling out samefagging is hilarious
Are you too stupid to realize that other people understand that phone posting shows a different IP than the one you used before samefagging?
>>
>>14485415
>In areas where circumcision is uncommon the data still shows a preference for uncircumcised
You just told me I'm right, are you alright in the head?
Also, I refuted you so hard, you've been chimping out in 4 consecutive posts

You will never feel the sensations normal men take for granted. You will never feel your frenulum stretch, your glans will always be keratinised.
And the fact that you think this is all in good sacrifice for American women is pure faggotry. You know I'm right, which is why you are seething so profoundly
>>
>>14469420
He's saying all men are trannies
>>
File: file.png (39 KB, 1436x151)
39 KB
39 KB PNG
>>14485415
>HAHAHAHA! You cannot provide any because it's not true and you are in denial about it
Why would I be in denial of something that goes against my mutilated anatomy? Are you this stupid?
Your "data" is outdated, the fact that it was published in 2015 does not change that. The kike you are talking about is this man in pic related, you are desperate to find any sort of validation for your scars, so you resort to a pedophile's junk studies.

And what I find even more hilarious is that you dismiss any anecdotes I have about my sex life, because it obviously conflicts with your circumsexual narrative.
Women find immobile penises disgusting, it induces friction and chafing in the vaginal walls. That's the most obvious conclusion, and you know it to be true, you wouldn't be seething otherwise.
You also dismiss the detriments of having a mutilated penis by handwaving it as someone's preference. It's hilarious. Are you a human dildo with no feelings?

And this is a strict anti-kike board. If you want to butcher penises, twitter is that way.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.