Why isn't evolution taught properly in schools?
>>14094824It is in develop countries. It's just some third world shit holes that can't shed the sky fairy meme.
>>14094824because it makes people chimp outi remember seeing a student screaming at the biology teacher about something something "her beliefs were being attacked" she had previous knowledge of what was going to be taught and was instructed to do thatonly after i grew up that i realized that that was the reason was that she had christard parents
>>14096039can you imagine that someone would believe and trust their own family's proven reliable, ages old traditional belief system over the ever-changing propaganda at the government schools which shifts around based on political whims and academic trends every few years?how are they!?!?!
>>14094824Idk, but I find it fascinating that many people -even well educated people- have a hard time understanding it.
There are issues with accepted evolutionary theories.they ignore evidence such as giant human skeletons several metres tall whose multiple reports are actively excised from historical record for some nefarious purpose.There is also the whole problem with their ideas of sedimentation layers taking decades to form when multiple experiments have proven fast sedimentation and stratification.Not even starting on the topic of fast fossilisation and mud fossils.Or gigantic mile long rock formations that bear uncanny resemblance to a giant elephant with rock layers and caves matching tissue differences and blood vessels...but that might be going too far down the /x/ pathI can post links for all of these points if you want them.
>>14095880>>14096046What is with these faggot feddit migrants? /sci/ has always been a board of the lord.
>>14096077My school forgot to mention that natural selection applies not only to creatures, but also to every cell living inside them. Evolution would be too random to work otherwise.
>>14094824Hard enough to convince people that they are descended from monkeys. Try and tell them they are descended from Tyrone.
>Evolution Reminder op
>>14096105We aren't descended from tyrone we share a common ancestor.anyway out of africa is very wrong, they've found modern human teeth coming out of asia predating it
>>14096046>can you imagine that someone would believe and trust their own family's proven reliable>God wished all organisms into existence>proven>reliable
>>14096119>anyway out of africa is very wrong, they've found modern human teeth coming out of asia predating it>someone on the internet said so and I want to believe it because omg I don't like tyrone so facts don't matter
>>14096133No it was a pretty serious publication.it adds more support to the multiregional theory.
>>14096133Not that anon but Chinese policy is that they prefer not to hear about OOA and that there was another ancestor in Asia.
>>14096077>I can post links for all of these pointswww.creation.orgwww.bibletruth.orgwww.genesis.orgwww.teachthecontroversy.orgwww.youtube.com
>>14096046Stay mad, Christcuck.The world is leaving you behind.It's the one and only thing for which I give the leftists and woketards props.INB4 "Christianity is growing in Nigeria!"
>>14096173I don't support the chink theory, I lean more to the in and out theory and coastal vs plains community
>>14096179Ah, so you're a drooling buffoon.
>>14096088>/sci/ has always been a board of the lord.Look, what the Christkikes don't get is that we've never taken them seriously. They flocked here from FreeRepublic, GLP, and other boomer haunts in 2016. But their very presence on 4chan, a degenerate anime-porno site, is the mark against their professed dogma, and nothing they can do can change that. Their presence is 10,000 times louder than their words. They're self-refuting. They have no conviction. They don't really believe in living a clean life. We high-IQ fedoras will never see them as anything more than a parody of themselves. The world is leaving Christkikes behind, and it's a pleasure to behold.It's a good century. Christkikes are dropping like flies. Christianity doesn't thrive in information-sharing ages. It's always needed to hide in the corner of rational enquiry, seething that the Earth revolves around the sun, that dinosaurs existed, that humans have evolved, etc. Literally one of the first things we learn in the Christkike Bible is that the Christkike God hates knowledge. Christianity can thrive only when it has the power to burn people and books. Without that power, it flops impotently and has to be tea-bagged by everything from Harry Potter to black metal.
>>14096185>and nothing they can do can change that.Not if you understand Jesus.
>>14096190Yes, yes, your all-in enjoyment of 4chan shitposting is like bringing a light into the dregs. It's not that you're a degenerate yourself. We've heard it before.
>>14094824>Why isn't evolution taught properly in schools?Is it not? I thought kids grew up playing Pokemon.
>>14096190> jesus spent all day trading bants and calling people niggers too, bro
>>14096180what a bilious, invective laden and emotional reaction to the topic of traditional belief systems. feels have taken over, rationality thrown out the window.
>>14096179Was this just a shoddy attempt at an insult or are you asking for actual sources to explore the subjects I brought up further?
>>14096197>everyone on 4chan is a hopelessly addicted pornography and masturbation addict because i amsorry to disappoint you, but thats just you projecting your most shameful habits and personality features on others in order to protect your ever weakening self image.
OP here, i wasn't talking about evolution vs religions i mean why aren't we taught that modern day humans besides Africans descend from homo-sapiens who mixed with Neanderthals
>>14096295Africans also have neanderthal DNA, just very little ~0.3%, while European/Asians have between 1-5%
>>14094824yo hol the fuck upis yo ass be sayin we wuz niggaz n shiet?
>>14096424>while European/Asians have between 1-5%Europeans and Middle Easterners have about 1.5%, Asians have about 2%.Pic related is what we knew till we detected the approximately 0.3% Neanderthal DNA in sub-Saharans.
>>14096455don't africans have up to 19% of something else?
And here's Denisovan ancestry.>14096477No, not that I've heard of.
>>14096455Sounds interesting, especially if you know that Neanderthals had up to 1800mL of brain volume and that Asians have also bigger brains.
>>14096477*1.9%>>14096482look up ghost hominid in west african genomes
>>14096493Also the denisovan picture is much more complex with at least 3 distinct admixture groups on the island populations.
>>14096482Some individuals apparently have up to 5% at least if we trust popsci reportinghttps://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/10/at-5-neanderthal-you-are-an-outlier/263475/
>>14094824We have a bright future.
Head anatomy for all three groups.
>>14096505What do you know about the gene regions with high or low neanderthal/demisovan admixture?
there are some interesting theories about neanderthals going aroundhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZbmywzGAVs
>>14096222If your buttmad response is your idea of emotional composure, I'll stick with my idea, thanks.
>>14096230Cope. You're enabling this degenerate site.Keep doing that Jesus-like missionary work, though.
>>14096505>from an academic in the U.S.:>I see contact with Neanderthals as having been ephemeral and primarily a result of rape by Neanderthal males of AMH [anatomically modern human] womenHow did he come to that conclusion? Speculation? We don't have Neanderthal Y-DNA or mtDNA. Only possible mixtures would have to be N male + HS female with only the girls from this mix breeding OR HS male + N female with only the males from this mix breeding, right? Or is this wrong? Other possibilities might have been selected against in the long run for whatever reason (some fuckery on X or Y chromosomes), naturally infertile, or the mixed population was small and experienced some event that lead to this.
>>14096543it ignores compatibility issues such as haldane's rule.mitochondria and y chromosomes are quite specialised
>>14096505>>14096531Trying to do some further research on this,https://theoutline.com/post/6241/what-does-it-mean-to-have-neanderthal-dnaFrom 2017;>At first, the emails told me that I had more Neanderthal DNA than 92 percent of users. But now, that number has risen to 96 percent — I have 318 instances of Neanderthal-gene variants across my 23 chromosome pairs, which is somehow more than either of my parents.So with 318 alleles, and>Using this definition, though, do we have agreement on the number of protein-coding genes? The short answer is no. The human genome began with the assumption that our genome contains 100,000 protein-coding genes, and estimates published in the 1990s revised this number slightly downward, usually reporting values between 50,000 and 100,000. The two initial human genome papers reported 31,000  and 26,588 protein-coding genes , and when the more complete draft of the genome appeared in 2004 , the authors estimated that a complete catalog would contain 24,000 protein-coding genes. The Ensembl human gene catalog described in that paper (version 34d) had 22,287 protein-coding genes and 34,214 transcripts.(Salzberg, S.L. Open questions: How many genes do we have?. BMC Biol 16, 94 (2018).)Combining this, we get 318/22000 which is less than 1.5%. I assume they don't check the whole genome, and maybe (for whatever reason) they happen to be testing regions that have more Neanderthal DNA? Which is how we hear about results like 5% etc.
>>14096551I see, very interesting.
>>14096560Some highly specialised gene regions are heavily purged of admixture, such as around the immune system or brain, worth a look into.
>>14096543From what I remember they looked at X chromosomes and measured relative diversity.
>>14096180>le christianity is dying!>over a billion catholics alone
>>14096295>why aren't we taughtFirst of all this is very new, much to new for schools to change, and secondly political correctness still trumps facts.>>14096424>Africans also have neanderthal DNAThis is a good example of PC. It was not until they cold say that Neanderthal genes were beneficial that they could state also Africans had some, otherwise we would be in a new position of institutional racism.>European/Asians have between 1-5%One anon posted he had 6 percent but I don't know how serious he was.
>>14096661I hate this PC illuminati tranny dystopia we're forced to live in.
>>14096077>>14096226Pst anon I want some of that good stuff. What's this about living caves?
>>14096747Stellium7's work is what I was referring to.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4ok2OzQMfw
>>14096686All men are created equal under God.No man is God, No man is immortal.You have 2 hands 2 feet and the right to defend yourself against tyranny.You let this happen.
>>14096807>All men are created equal under God.>In reality some are taller others shorter, some are smarter, some are prettier, some are hermaphrodites etc. Either the equality the Bible speaks about isn't physical or cognitive (maybe "spiritual"?) or the Bible is obviously wrong.
>>14096661>This is a good example of PC. It was not until they cold say that Neanderthal genes were beneficial that they could state also Africans had some,Retard
>>14096600Cope, you fucking Christnigger.I don't care about non-White countries the way you do and your based MAGApedes do.
>>14096661>Neanderthal genes were beneficialConsidering they got replaced by illegal sapiens immigrants, I'm not sure Neanderthals were all that superior
>>14097051No humans outside Africa have problems with the mirror test.
>>14096118He developed that jaw by chewing whatever ancient grains his tribe was able to grow or gather, definitely not from soft foods like animal parts
>>14097069>No humans outside Africa have problems with the mirror test.A 30 seconds Google search says otherwise.
>>14094824Evolution is forbidden knowledge because it leads to the conclusion that Jews are brood parasites. Look up E.O. Wilson and the sociobiology shit storm.
>>14097346Psychology?Anyway, self-referring is not necessarily identical to mirror test.Also people in the US come from all over the world, a large fraction from Africa.
>>14096226>actual sourcesDon't bother, your YEC retardation is oozing from the screen
>>14097497>Anyway, self-referring is not necessarily identical to mirror test.Anon that's the same paper that researched those Africans (Kenyans specifically) who had issues with the mirror test in which you based your statement on. They used the same methodology for both the Africans and other populations. The Fiji people did even worse and they are outside of Africa.
>>14097569You're welcome. I appreciate the open minded.
>>14095880You can believe in God and in evolution square-headed retard>b-but blabberingIt's in the fucking books you can, just read books fucking sperglord
>>14097580>believe in God and in evolutionDinosaurs done dirty by God. Should have build more temples.
>>14094824>Why isn't evolution taught properly in schools?Because even ardent proponents of evolution don't understand it properly.
>>14097069Neither do Africans. They just pass at a different time.
>>14095880And all more worthy of the joys and bounty that life and the world can afford to a man given by Gods grace than you.
>>14094824Because it's not a proper scientific theoryEven Darwin's finches were recently discovered to not be evolving. They adapt from inheritable epigenetics while their gene frequency stays almost entirely constant, thus not meeting the definition of evolution which is a change in gene frequency of a population. When you get get something wrong and think it was right for 150 years it's kinda means you don't have a valid theory: you are just guessing and getting lucky if observations accidentally match your guess.
>>14096560>I assume they don't check the whole genome"They" don't. That classic headfake propaganda that we have "97% shared DNA with monke" is only looking at protein coding DNA, which is only 1% of all DNA. So they're saying if we selectively look at just 1% of our DNA then we share almost that entire 1% with monke. Pretty sure the rest is not shared and is vastly different because if it wasn't they'd happily say so. This is actually a good answer to OP question: if they taught anything properly it would reveal how much of a hoax evolutionary origin and common ancestry hypotheses really are.
>>14096845>the equality the Bible speaks about isn't physical or cognitive (maybe "spiritual"?)Correct, it's spiritual or equal in the eyes of God. For instance the Phillistines were a race of powerful giants. The Bible openly says this. The Bible never implies races are equal by human standards. If one race can be bigger and stronger there is no reason to think one race can't be smarter. If you want to get hung up on the Bible being literal you should read a hyper literal translation, or learn the original language. It makes no sense to take a translation literally because many words have no literal translation.... This is what Genesis reads like literally in the Concordant Literal Translation, it's pretty whacky to see what Hebrew literally means in English without interpretation and context we see in translations meant for every day English reading: https://studybible.info/CLV/Genesis Every "contradiction" in Genesis can be cleared up by realizing you are not supposed to take a non literal translation literally.
Can I get a Quick Rundown on Homo Erectus?
>>14099481If evolution was taught properly, people may notice that they can control it. And simply undo millennia of domestication.
>>14094824Religion plays a big factor when it comes to not properly educating children on evolution. This is not to say that all religious people have a deep seated distrust in science or suffer from a lack of scientific literacy because this is evidently not the case. Religious extremism is on the far side of the spectrum and is the exception and not the rule. Unfortunately it just so happens to be that in the west many of these religious extremists are the ones in power and dictating who gets to teach what to children in schools. Compound this with the fact that many states have loopholes in the differing educational systems and their laws consequently allowing for there to be thousands of schools across the USA that will not teach evolution and thousands more that will teach biblical creationism as historic and scientific fact.
>>14101114It really is no suprise why such a large percentage of Americans share the same anti-science sentiments
>>14096573I thought there was evidence of a lot of introgression from Neanderthals in genes related to the immune system.
>>14096484Neanderthals had larger, more developed visual vortexes than humans, so the differences in brain sizes are partially accounted for by that.
>>14101114you can stand behind evolution as "proven fact" or whatever only because of your unfamiliarity with darwin's text, which is nearly 200 year old and is badly in need of revision to account for subsequent scientific discoveries. in the 1850s, when the concepts embodied in modern evolutionary thought were developed, science considered earth to be a garden of eden with a never changing climate and never changing geology in darwin's day. evidence of mass extinction events, ice ages, tectonic activity and other factors were discovered subsequent to darwin and are still not accounted for in the 1850s theory. darwin didn't know about dna or chromosomes or any of that either, theres a lot of stuff in the origin of the species which is at odds with modern science.
>>14101144>NOOO YOU CANT SAAY THAAAT>LISTEN TO THE CONSENSUS>WE ARE ALL THE SAME>ONE EARTH ONE RACE
>>14101141I started off laughing at those posts, then began to mourn realizing our species really is ngmi.
>>14101114I think letting failed scientists teach children plays a bigger role.
>>14096573>>14101136In Europeans the majority of remaining neanderthal genes are related to the following phenotypes:>chronotype>visual cortex size and forehead slope>immune traits>fat distribution>bodily responses to uv radiationNeanderthals had been in inbreeding for so long and so persistently that they had built up a large amount of weakly deleterious mutations which got purged when human population sizes increased enough for selection to do its thing.*In Europeans* neanderthal variants are depleted in the brain. Even the neanderthal variants which we do have which act in the brain are under expressed in comparison to human derived variants.Interestingly enough neanderthals reintroduced genes to humans which we carried at one point but slowly lost in our lineage, while the neanderthals never lost them.
>>14101161At least a couple of them are being sarcastic. The lad talking about Satan hiding fossils, for example.
>>14101161when only AOC cares about preventing the thing that will kill us all it truly wonthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eVdksZHqpo>>14101176that post might be unironicpeople on facebook don't talk like that
>>14094824I believe the Gods exist.I believe in creation and God of the Gaps.Denying science is utterly retarded, I blame the over the top zealot charismatic evangelicals.
>>14101144Which is why it has been revised and updated to account for modern information.
>>14096077>There is also the whole problem with their ideas of sedimentation layers taking decades to form when multiple experiments have proven fast sedimentation and stratificationSo your little pathetic retard article will disprove 200 years of geological knowledge ?You do know that sedimentation and formation of strates on the Oceanic floor comes from the erosion of the rocks of continents ? And all these sediments gets dispersed around the globe with currents ?Are you actually saying that there is some NIGGER experiment that shows that stratification happens at a faster rate that have we have already measured all over the world for probably a century?> .t nigger
>>14101511it hasn't, its been jealously guarded like a religious text by generations of maynard smiths
>>14101171>Neanderthals had been in inbreeding for so long and so persistently that they had built up a large amount of weakly deleterious mutations which got purged when human population sizes increased enough for selection to do its thing.This point is somewhat disputed
>>14101536>source my ass
>>14101512Fast stratification can happen this isn't particularly disputed, are you a nigger?
>>14101586>i'm so obsessed will delectation that i can't resist bringing it into every topicyou potty training was very traumatic, hopefully you can recover from it eventually, good luck.https://theendofziondotcom1.wordpress.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/
>>14101536>science>guarded like religious text.
>>14096543>rapeHow could he possible know if those ancient whores consented or not, I sure they absolutely craved BNC.
>>14094824Evolution as a working model is only legitimately useful in a handful of scientific fields and, as general knowledge, doesn’t really provide anything of value to a high school student. The only reason it’s taught at all is because it makes Christians REEE and certain academic types enjoy that kind of trolling. If it wasn’t for the culture war aspect of it, evolution would be taught on the same scale as the hard shell model of the atom.
>>14099423The premise of evolution correct, but you are right, DNA is over rated and they are other mechanisms at play that need to be researched, everyone just settled on DNA as the answer to everything.
>>14101512>So your little pathetic retard article will disprove 200 years of geological knowledge >experiment that shows that stratification happens at a faster rate that have we have already measured Who needs articles just use your eyeballs. Stratification happens very rapidly. What they've "measured" is cherry picked garbage data that is chosen because it aligns with dogma.
>>14103969>The premise of evolution correctThe barebones unfalsifiable idea that heredity + change + selection = change in basic gene frequency of a population (evolution) is correct, sure. Any extrapolation past that is conjecture, such as developing complexity in a given timeframe via only natural guidance, new traits spreading to the entire species, and post-zygotic speciation (with the exclusive exception of plants). People only assume these things did happen in the past and did happen due to evolution.>everyone just settled on DNA as the answer to everythingThe same way everyone just settled on evolution as the answer to everything.
>>14104124>"fuck the Geological column"Why have you not once mentioned "living fossils"?I'd figure you'd be right into shit like Graptolites, tuatara, Lepidocaris crustacean, Metasequoia conifer tree, Neopilina mollusk, lingula brachiopod, or at least the trilobite?
>>14104985That was my first post about geology you have me confused with another anon. Living fossils are not really a geologic issue since the excuse is they are "perfectly evolved" for it's niche and "thus" never went extinct and had no reason to change. It's an "is ought" fallacy based on circular reasoning (it's perfect because it never changed and it never changed because it's perfect and aught to stay that way if it's perfect) but sure, it's not entirely implausible. The problem comes along when some of these living fossils clearly don't meet the evolutiontard's definition of perfectly evolved with no need to change for hundreds of millions of years. Coelacanth is the most famous living fossil and is currently almost extinct and it's not due to mankind. It's impossible to rationally claim it's perfectly evolved for it's niche, especially when there is almost complete niche overlap with sharks and the competitive exclusion principle requires that Coelacanth would have gone extinct hundred+ million years ago due to this, or been pushed out of the same niche as sharks. This is all blissfully ignored by evolutionists and geologists.
>>14105152>Living fossils are not really a geologic issue since the excuse is they are "perfectly evolved" for it's niche and "thus" never went extinct and had no reason to change.They each appear hundreds of millions of years ago at a specific strata-layer then DISSAPEARED and seen NO WHERE ELSE on the Geological column.>they already came and went, long ago<