It looks like a Combinatorics problem. Let us see what you tume/sci/ng plebi/sci/tes can do.
>>13263401>>13263404That's what I got, too.
>>13263289Quick questions, can the shape be rotated? If for example the 2 top sticks are white it's the same pattern if the 2 right most sticks were white, just rotated. If rotations of patterns don't count as distint patterns then I guess the answer would be 12.
>>13263289It's either 36 or less than 36 with some stupid explanation of how two combos are technically only one by rotating the triangle around
>>13263441Thats what I think also>>13263439.\`~`\
>>13263448Beat me by 3 seconds :0
>>13263450That's why my IQ is more better and you are a middwidht comprared to my intellelect 〻 `w´〻
>>13263463Inferior EQ cope
Is rotation allowed, is flipping it allowed? If neither is allowed it's just a trivial 9 choose 2 calculation and not really a suitable IQ test question. 36 if neither flipping nor rotation allowed12 if exclusively either allowed but this would be weird, I don't understand why you would allow for example rotation but not allow flipping as both are symmetries of the triangle which is why I don't think 12 is ever the correct answer here. 4 if both flipping and rotation allowedThe language is deliberately imprecise in these types of questions just to drive engagement in comment sections, it's not an actual IQ test.
>>13263472EQ? Embrace Quran? Yes my EQ 0 then, thank you.
>>13263289If we make one rod a known and designated white rod, then the remaining white rod can exist in 8 different positions, meaning that for each fixed white rod, there are 8 variations of the second white rodThis means there are 9*8 = 72 possible configurations if both white rods are treated discretely. However as i assume each white rod is interchangeable for the sake of patterns, then for each of the configurations of fixed white rod and non-fixed white rod, there is an opposite case of the same pattern appearing with a non fixed white rod and a fixed white rod. This means you divide 72 in half, to get 36.The answer is therefore 36
>>13263439>>13263487The wording of the question is direct copypasta from the Test.
>>13263796shit, nvm it's 9
>>13263289post the intended answer please OP
>>13263914I don't have access to the scoring rubric, sorry.
>>132632899 choose 2?
>>13263289forget the triangle, align them all like wwbbbbbbb, notice that all the combinations are 8 + 7 + 6 ... which is (8^2 - 8)/2, which is 28, but triangles are 3-symetric so you divide by 3 and have... 9.33? wtf
>>13263801>>13263796shit, nvm it's 81>//2>/\3>/>>\4>/>>_5>/_6>/>>/7>/>\8>_>\
>>132641098+7... is 36 not 28 you gorillanigger
>>13263289what constitutes a pattern
>>13264402I hate these tests with ambiguous questions. WTF do they mean by "different"?
>>132632899 choose 2 divided by 6 for rotational and reflective symmetries.
"How many different ways of picking 2 out of 9 elements are there?" What's the deal with all of the rods and triangles mumbo jumbo?