How can we improve the "peer-review'' process of science, specially medical and biological sciences? I heard it might not be unbiased after all.
I see no issue.
Man, just shut the fuck up.If you /pol/tards still haven't figured out how to end wokeness or are too lazy to do so, then you deserve all the misery you get.The fact that white Democrats, white CEOs, white billionaires, etc., cruise by all this wokeness unscathed shows what complete and utter fucking failures you tards are.
>>13259296>I heard it might not be unbiased after all.myshockedface.png
>>13259322Translation:Sick fuck finds a way to fool people into thinking she isnt looking at dog pussies ot get off on them.
>>13259317Not sure what you think that proves, actually supports OP's point that there is immense bias coming from one direction, not the other
>>13259332It proves that you /pol/tards would rather whine for years about something that could easily be fixed in two months tops with a modicum of subversive imagination.
>>13259341>It proves that you /pol/tards would rather whine for years about something that could easily be fixed in two months tops with a modicum of subversive imagination.let's hear your big idea then
>>13259317First we needed to fight through a republican party who is so used to instantly surrendering at the slightest threat of being called rayciss, but even without the right learning to use cancel culture to its advantage it was eating more lefties than righties.The left openly embracing hitler-caliber ethnic cleansing rhetoric is really helping some cucks find their balls though, so that's good.>>13259341Commierot is far too deeply embedded now. "Fixing" it would effectively mean dismantling all of western civilization, which might be slightly beyond the capabilities of /pol/.
>>13259344Sorry not doing your homework for you.
>>13259328I think that was a group of -based- social scientists who intentionally published wacky studies to show that the peer-review process was broken and biased towards -woke- studies
>>13259344I've seen at least a dozen people share game-changing ideas, but 'lel kek not your personal army'. Just stick with what you guys are good at: pointless flag captures, spergy IOTBW paths of most resistance, mocking Reddit trannies, and -- the latest and greatest -- making buck-breaking memes.
>>13259354Is it better or worse for academia that the peer-reviewed and published study about dog rape culture was actually fake?
>>13259360So you posted a retarded "game-changing" idea on /pol/, asked them to be your personal army, they told you to fuck off, and now you're assblasted. Got it.
>>13259363Get yourself some reading comprehension ("I've seen..."). Also, shit thread for /sci/.
>>13259363Back to /pol/, lazy brainlet./sci/ isn't your personal grievance group.
>>13259369https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/%22not%20your%20personal%20army%22Please show us which thread(s) have these phenomenal game-changing ideas.
>>13259361With the rise of atheism beastiality studies will become more prevalent and important.
>>13259374Bruh, the vast majority of the time, good ideas aren't actually met with EXPLICIT "not your personal army" comments. That's just a way to denote the undercurrent of /pol/'s culture of misdirected energy at best and utter uselessness at worst.
>>13259384How does atheism make bestiality important? I don’t understand the logic here.
>>13259406When polled most atheists don't find beastiality morally wrong, they make beastiality porn, and atheist philosophers have argued in favor of it, in certain contexts [when the animal is not harmed], and as such we see beastiality legalized in some western countries and so more studies will be done on this atheist sexual preference
>>13259406Morality (and by extension, the law) which doesn't derive from religion is malleable and controlled by the will of whoever holds societal power - which in the current world means sexual degenerates who'd fuck literally anything.
>>13259317>the rich faggots who push the shit are unscathed by itwow, who would've thunk.
>>13259419>>13259423Yeah I get that part but that just means it’d be more prevalent. They way they used the word “important” made it sound like it would somehow become necessary.
>>13259453It took about ten years to go from "What two men do in the privacy of their own bedroom is no one's business" to Richard Levine being head of HHS and tranny beavers on Blue's Clues, so I really don't think it's a hyperbolic prediction.
>>13259317"Whites" lol you forget who pol noses...the noses
>>13259317>The wealthy elites of the country aren't damaged by horrible bigotry because they have money>See! It's not a problem!Dumb fuck. Unironically kill yourself you fucking moron.
>>13259317We know how to end wokeness, but when we tell you, you call us Nazis, even though the Nazis never actually attempted it.
>>13259296We kill all the psychoanalysts.
free helo rides
>>13259450Occupy Wall Street was another street movement that the elites laugh at, it was never a threatYou dumb retarded commie literally nobody fears you, you will only ever be a useful idiot
>>13259334Back to /pol/, chud
>>13259317>unscathedThe ritual self abasement they're required to perform in order to not be "canceled" and lose everything they hold dear (i.e. their twitter followers) is pretty "scathing", at least on a subconscious human dignity level.
>>13261005Look at those liberal milkers.
>>13260073Way to miss his point completely.It's just fucking sad that you guys don't have the IQ or creativity to turn the anti-white woke mob against all those white folks who've yet to feel the heat of wokeness and who have the power to grind it to a halt when things get too close for comfort (as what happened with Coca-Cola).
>>13259317>You're a poltard if you don't hate white peopleWhat kind of logic is this? How can you look at this and think "this is a perfectly normal way to treat an entire race"?
>>13261905gee i wonder
>>13259296>"Symptoms of Whiteness may include: Drinking water, exercising, general awareness of health, mathematical skill, education, employment..."How interesting. Why "cure" this? And why does the jew who wrote this fail to capitalize White half the time? How strange.
>>13261905Mass brainwashing genuinely, unironically works. Two years ago exactly 0% of the world would've said that putting billions of people under house arrest was a reasonable and sane response to the flu.
>>13263370>covid is the same as the flufucking retard
>>13263397Wear more masks.
>>13263370https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/02/state-fear-ministers-used-covert-tactics-keep-scared-public/>Dated March 22, the paper written by the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours (SPI-B) stated: “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened; it could be that they are reassured by the low death rate in their demographic group, although levels of concern may be rising … the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat.”>The same document presented a grid of 14 options for increasing compliance which included “use media to increase sense of personal threat”, a tactic which was seen as having a “high” effectiveness though spill-over effects “could be negative”.
>>13259296peers are faggots, it's queer review.
>>13259296We publish EVERYTHING online.We then counter-balance those rants with reviews in the comment section and likes-dislikes ratings made by both specialists and common public, so one can switch between those ratings if he likes.
>>13264751>replace scientific journals with redditSurely this will help
>>13259296Psychoanalysis is not a science. So who cares what they publish. Most stuff in J Am Psychoanal Assoc. is junk anyway, just look at it.
>>13259296You need to first discover real metrics instead of self reported psychometrics and get rid subjective observations like identifying/diagnosing things based on color, size, or shape that hearkens back to phrenology and other outdated pseudosciences.
>>13264841With some even more liberal form of arXiv.No mods but some ai porn remover maybe.No end to the discussions. You can modify the ammount of comments you want to see. Only from some reviewers with relevant degrees (we both probably know that this alone will not guarantee the quality of the comments, but even if it were them alone allowed to comment, it would already be better than the modern peer-review, because now they have to do it secretly, for otherwise it would be too much embarrassing for them (they never confess that they may have no specialists in the subject, for example) so they should be forced to publish all the applications on their site (and only few selected ones in paper) and on that database this site I imagined would be founded. If it was some bad science, reviewers would explains why and how exactly that science was bad. So students can learn how not to do science, just like Haneke said that the best way to learn how to write sceenplays is by reading the bad ones. And so in those settings you can adjust it to your taste from strict academic digest to unmoderated imageboard with anons commenting. And that setting would be by default, because watch this board, it's relatively reasonable and surely much more fun than queer-review, where you're almost punished for doing science, like I would be shocked if I didn't know that institutions are not to help scientists, but to control them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebqAH5mLZNk
>>13264958And I share this business plan because I want as many of these trees as there are torrent servers. Information wants to be free. And it must be free. Because that is the preservance of the civilization, not less. Artists and scientists should be funded by their relatives who know them from the childhood as bright chaps, and later by their fans and by their inventions if they're lucky to be taken under some rich guy's wing. Scientists shouldn't be motivated by money, because that's how they sell out and that is the path to the worst forms of the bad science, also published forms.
>>13259322Isn't this particular paper one of the fakes in the Greivance Studies Affair? A handful of those papers were peer-reviewed and praised, demonstrating how completely fucked the social sciences are.
is pubmed fucking buzzfeed now?
>>13264889>You need to first discover real metrics instead of self reported psychometrics and get rid subjective observations like identifying/diagnosing things based on color, size, or shape that hearkens back to phrenology and other outdated pseudosciences.So, how are you going to diagnose things like hearing loss or vision loss objectively and not on self-reported psychometrics?
>>13265453Measuring neural or synaptic response.
>>13265470>Measuring neural or synaptic response.I expected to hear this answer. Psychometric methods for determining hearing threshold or visual acuity are robust and proven methods and it is questionable whether measuring neural correlates is much more efficient or accurate. Furthermore, it is also questionable whether neural correlates are good correlates for hearing loss or visual acuity deterioration. The absence of an expected neuronal signal for hearing loss or vision loss, for example, does not mean that they did not occur. If you want to measure subjective experiences, e.g. how well a person sees or hears, you will not get around psychometry.
>>13260698>NOOOO YOU CAN'T MAKE FUN OF GOD'S CHOSEN
>>13259317>If you /pol/tards still haven't figured out how to end wokeness or are too lazy to do so, then you deserve all the misery you get.Why are Americans like this?
>>13265323who knows anymore man, as far as i can tell they almost all seem fake these days
All professional physicists use arXiv which does not do peer review at all. It is better for the reader to review material themselves. If something is good and important, they will hear about it from their "peers." Peer review is a relic of the pre-internet era and also a tool for the government to censor undesirable results.How to Reject any Scientific Manuscripthttps://vixra.org/abs/0907.0020>After a short overview of arguments pro and contra peer reviews, examples of gross misjudgement are compiled, followed by an attempt to identify some frequent, recurrent patterns of unjustified rejection of scientific manuscripts. A few specific questions are studied in more detail: the claim for still more precise and comprehensive definitions, the right way of handling "parallel theories", and the frequent misuse of the term "pseudoscience". Finally, practical rules to improve refereeing, and "basic rights of authors" are proposed, together with a word of encouragement for future authors.
>>13268028Can somebody explain that picture for me, please?
>>13269595It's just the resident schizo of /sci/ being mad that his inane ramblings were removed from Arxiv. Just ignore him.
>>13269908What you say tells that you understand that level of math or whatever. Mind explaining why what's in there is false? Please?
>>13270126It's not false, it's not even wrong
>>13270220So why do you (or whoever) call him a schizo?
>>13259322Either animals can't rape or rape is acceptable for animals.
>>13269595It looks like he tried to submit the reimann zeta function as an original work and it was rejected by moderation because it wasn't provable?
>>13270126It's the infinity hat meme which if you haven't seen before you need to lurk more. Basically he's trying to treat infinity as you would a finite real number. Which obviously causes a bunch of nonsense to happen.
>>13259341Nothing about it is fixable anon. Leftist subversion has wormed its way deep into all features of western civilization. I don't even think of it as a purely leftist feature anymore, western nations have been infected with a social virus that is insistent on deconstruction in all platforms. Literature, television, film, even games. I think an honest-to-god researcher studying societal behavioristics has the most incredible set of data to draw from imaginable. He would never be published, but it would be interesting to see an interpretation of what is going on
>>13264958>>13264959ESL or bad AI, either way what the fuck
>>13270439That's how everybody speaks in 2120.
>>13270389Hitler on the far left
>>13259296how can we improve the replicability of science? shit is not even real man
>>13272356>how can we improve the replicability of science?First teach AI to recognize the logical consistency of the work.Second teach AI to make the experimentations on its models.Third hire AI to rate all the applications on the replicability scale.
>>13265443He has racist sexual fantasies about black men.