Science has now confirmed that the average intelligence of, say, a random australian aboriginal is identical to a random japanese man. Same phenomenon is observed for all other traits dealing with the brain. The brain is protected from the environment by the fjords of Finland among other things, which isn't the case for skin color.Explained in simple terms by the twitch science man: https://streamable.com/tzkw90
>>12931292>genes that are very easily affected by external stimuli. Your skin, your hair, your nose, this is all exposed to the elements... Your brain's in your skull man, it's not being affected by the sun, the wind, or the rain.Jesus Christ
>Skin color, iris color, nose shape are usually single genetic traits or like three or two gene traitsWhy would you go on the internet and tell lies?
>>12931292Braindead /sci/ degenerates
>>12931292>your brain is in your skull man!LMFAOwhat a moron
>its not nurture, its nature now
>fjords of Finlandyour average IQ poaster
>>12931454no such thing as a fjord. coastal indentations exist on a scale, just like races. this is called science.
>>12931292There exists aboriginals smarter than japanese, which is precisely why population dynamics are retarded
>>12931479>aboriginals are smarter than japaneseSo, yes and no. Like, they are smart. But also the same. So, this sounds like a paradox, but it's not. Tthis is only one of many wonders of enlightingment, which is reached after meditating away all bigot with a sustainable herbivore diet and lean forward.
>>12931479>There exists aboriginalsyou mean the Ainu? kek
>>12931536Show me pure blooded ainu, you can'tThere is no such thing as ainu
Is race real?
>>12931630Science says yes.
>>12931633Wrong.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1196372>Of 3,636 subjects of varying race/ethnicity, only 5 (0.14%) [!!!] showed genetic cluster membership different from their self-identified race/ethnicity... Thus, ancient geographic ancestry, which is highly correlated with self-identified race/ethnicity—as opposed to current residence—is the major determinant of genetic structure in the U.S. population.
>>12931642For every member of race you show you can measure they have DNA shared with other races and even frogs, fish, insects.
>>12931678It's the scientific proof that race doesn't exist
>>12931689How does that follow?
>>12931647>For every member of race>with other races>>12931689>race doesn't existeven you don't believe your own bullshit, lol
>>12931697So you're a science denier, great>>12931702I am quoting him, we can call them clowns instead if you want
>>12931710>you're a science denierHow am I a 'science denier'?
>>12931723>>12931717There's literally 10k+ papers in all the most prestigious journals titled some variation of "no, race doesn't exist"You are science deniers of settles scientific fact
>>12931728Sociology and anthropology aren't as reliable as biology and genetics.
Then why are niggers fucking retarded
>>12931728nah, you've literally been brainwashed by reddithttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12879450/
>>12931728>There's literally 10k+ papers in all the most prestigious journals titled some variation of "no, race doesn't exist"Source?>inb4 he posts a social """science""" journal
>>12931728Humanities journals aren't scientific journals
>>12931874The science is, in fact SETTLED. The burden of proof is on you to prove your fantastical claims - might I suggest /pol/ or neonaziKKKunitewhitepower dot org.https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/looking-in-the-cultural-mirror/201109/the-main-reason-races-don-t-existhttps://www.newsweek.com/there-no-such-thing-race-283123>In 1950, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) issued a statement asserting that all humans belong to the same species and that "race" is not a biological reality but a myth. This was a summary of the findings of an international panel of anthropologists, geneticists, sociologists, and psychologists.
>>12931902Science is never settled. That you believe science is above questioning exposes you a member of the IFLS! Church.
>>12931902>UN fiat statementNot science.
>>12931902https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1196372>Of 3,636 subjects of varying race/ethnicity, only 5 (0.14%) showed genetic cluster membership different from their self-identified race/ethnicity... Thus, ancient geographic ancestry, which is highly correlated with self-identified race/ethnicity—as opposed to current residence—is the major determinant of genetic structure in the U.S. population.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12879450/>In popular articles that play down the genetical differences among human populations, it is often stated that about 85% of the total genetical variation is due to individual differences within populations and only 15% to differences between populations or ethnic groups. It has therefore been proposed that the division of Homo sapiens into these groups is not justified by the genetic data. This conclusion, due to R.C. Lewontin in 1972, is unwarranted because the argument ignores the fact that most of the information that distinguishes populations is hidden in the correlation structure of the data and not simply in the variation of the individual factors. The underlying logic, which was discussed in the early years of the last century, is here discussed using a simple genetical example.
>>12931914>>12931929Settled since 1950, cope as I slide my best friend's 11 inch black mamba into your wife
>>12931902are you literally trolling? newsweek? this has to be bait.
>>12931902www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886901000290>This paper proposes that there are racial and ethnic differences in psychopathic personality conceptualised as a continuously distributed trait, such that high values of the trait are present in blacks and Native Americans, intermediate values in Hispanics, lower values in whites and the lowest values in East Asians. Part one of the paper sets out the evidence for this thesis. Part two applies the thesis to the unresolved problem in The Bell Curve that racial and ethnic differences in a number of social phenomena such as crime, welfare dependency, rates of marriage, etc. cannot be fully explained by differences in intelligence and proposes that some of the residual disparities are attributable to differences in psychopathic personality. Part three of the paper integrates the theory with Rushton’s r-K theory of race differences.https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.186.102>The culture-only (0 % genetic–100 % environmental) and the hereditarian (50% genetic–50 % environmental) models of the causes of mean Black–White differences in cognitive ability are compared and contrasted across 10 categories of evidence: the worldwide distribution of test scores, g factor of mental ability, heritability, brain size and cognitive ability, transracial adoption, racial admixture, regression, related life-history traits, human origins research, and hypothesized environmental variables. The new evidence reviewed here points to some genetic component in Black–White differences in mean IQ.
>>12931939>>12931902>UNESCO issued a statement
>>12931943Are you claiming that newsweek is lying about UNESCO's scientific finding?
>>12931902>The authors of the new Science article noted that racial assumptions could also be particularly dangerous in a medical setting.What a load of drivel. Example:>SCD occurs among about 1 out of every 365 Black or African-American births.>SCD occurs among about 1 out of every 16,300 Hispanic-American births. >About 1 in 13 Black or African-American babies is born with sickle cell trait (SCT).
>>12931902>>12931960>UNESCO's scientific findinglol the article is misleading you, and you fell for it like the gullible retard you arehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Race_Question#The_1951_revised_statement
>>12931939>cope as I slide my best friend's 11 inch black mamba into your wifeLeftists are mentally ill
>>12931902>Michael Yudell: 'ethicist'>Dorothy Roberts: 'public intellectual and social justice advocate'>Jefferson Fish: psychologist>Robert Sussman: anthropologistwew
>>12931960I am claiming that you should use peer-reviewed studies to be taken seriously
>>12931347>the environment only selects for the parts of you it touches, man
>>12931902Do you have any surveys? One institution is not all scientists. Anyways you accept race you just dont like it when whites do it because that makes them ethnocentric. Also this has to be b8 all of your arguments are just> no> appeal to authority> that isnt true> ignoring people
>>12932391>do you have surveys to prove UFOs don't exist?ALL employed, prominent, and/or prestigious scientists says this is settled science: race is a social construct created from white supremacy and has no biological basis
>>12932548Source?Also no actually in the west around almsot half reconize race. In eastern european its 70 percent accept race and in china is 100 percent. > white supremacyWhat is that? Take medsAnyways the egyptians and arabs both had race concepts like how does that work.Also you are completely wrong like alwaysRace can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622
>>12932625>sorce? otherwise ufos realI just want you to die actually. You aren't even human.
>>12932625> in the west around almsot half reconize race.Source for that?>In eastern european its 70 percent accept race source?>in china is 100 percent. source?>the egyptians and arabs both had race conceptssource?>you are completely wrongsource?
>>12932698Yes give me a source>>12932705https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/18/what-the-experts-really-think-about-race-realism-and-white-nationalism-or-at-least-ideas-pertaining-to-it/The concept of race existed in ancient Greece, Rome, Egypt, China, India, and Arabia.http://www.amazon.com/Race-The-Reality-Human-Differences/dp/0813340861> muh white supremacyMore hateful racist scapegoating /sci/ is no place for anti white racism
>>12932705Also i already didI gave my source on the genes for finding someones race so you are 99.8 percent wrong
>>12932877I asked for sources for 7 fantastical claims and you only linked>thealternativehypothesis.orgsome kind of of weird racist blogyou're even less sourced and read than UFO reptilian conspiracy nuts
cool so no cause for immigrants or foreign exchange studnts
>>12932984Its all in the article so that tells me you didnt read it.Also i already cited three in this thread stop lying> YUR STATSS ARE FAKE FAKKKKKEEEcope, anti white
>>12932548See >>12931937 and >>12931953 and stop pulling shit out of your ass, you dishonest cretin.
>>12931292>>12931324>>12931347this is literal rick and morty tieryou fags believing in OPs retardation need to go back to plebbit and continue collecting funko pops
>>12931292>average intelligence of, say, a random australian aboriginal is identical to a random japaneseWhy stop at random averages? I just discovered the intelligence of every aboriginal is identical to every japanese. Absolutely everyone has exactly 100 IQ.
>>12933279holy shitwe're all equal now
>>12931902>race is a social construct>a social construct is something that has been accepted true by a society>nearly every society on earth has accepted that science proves races exist and are genetically differentoops
>>12931728sociology journals are not science
>>12931902hahahahah oh jesus christ this must be bait
>>12931728>settled scientific factThats not how the scientific method works.
>>12931728>deniers of settles scientific facthey manlook at this pic and tell me what you think of it
>>12931540>Show me pure blooded ainu, you can't>show me the boundary between yellow and red
>>12931292Aside from it being retarded, i don't think it's even true. It seems like he's saying that there'd be like 20 genes different in Japanese population vs African ones for e.g. Even just randomly looking at in a database allele pairs one can see there are usually marked statistical differences between populations.Vaush has always been a complete grifter. He literally uses "Lenin would do X" as a carrot on a stick to convince his audience of X. LOL!:))
>>12933260I made the satire obvious but only you caught on. /sci/ is not very intelligent.
>yea, people can differ in their height and is almost due genetics, it's a stabilis fact.>nooooooooooooooooooooooo, you can't heckin tell the people are differentino in cognitive capacite, and is due geneticrinos!The duality (and insanity) of midwits.
>>12934308Well "iq is caused by genetics" position is 99% klansmen with drooling 40 iq so what do you expect
Holy shit there is so much cope in here from racists. Data and settled science has been demonstrated to them and all they can do is link to the alternative hypothesis, a long known and discredited neo nazi blog. Sad day for science when it has to address morons like this.
>>12934425This. The science is settled. We are all equal.
>>12932002> SussmanWhat an unfortunate surname.> FishWtf?
>>12934396>ad hominemvery intelligent argument anonkill yourself now
>>12934608Yudell too is an (((unfortunate))) name
>>12934425>>12934435>THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!
>>12935657>homo erectus>homo habilisholy fuck what a pseud
Has anyone been able to debunk pic related?
>TFW studying population genetics in college is what turned me into a race realist>TFW i'm half black
>Genetics has been shown to be the best predictor of life outcome>IQ accounts for 80% of IQ differences>Racial IQ differences are so large they could only be explained by that 80%
I would 100% love for some anon to prove that racial IQ differences aren't based on genetics. The sad fact is is that so far the only "evidence" for it being cultural is retards calling you a nazi for not believing them that it is.
I'm honestly not interested in digging into this topic. I'm neither a geneticist nor an evolutionary biologist, but from my limited point of view it seems very unlikely that humans evolved with such dramatic differences from looks to abilities, yet somehow brain function is exactly the same in every part of the world.I feel like this is just the easy, feel good opinion that has emerged for political reasons and that no scientist wants to question in fear of social suicide.As a consequence there is no reason for me to give a shit about it. There is no possibility for a reasonable discussion about this issue in our current world and I don't even know what conclusions one would draw if racial IQ differences where the case...
>>12936517This isn't just racial but nearly all human differences in success can be traced to genetics. The political implications are that programs that try to get the poor to do better in education likely wont work because their success is based on genetic factors. The sad fact is, is that most of the education changes over the last 30 years have just been a huge waste of money and have never worked and the reason being is that no matter how good schooling is, genetics will hold back people.Programs like "No child left behind" only hurt the intelligent by wasting resources on those that will never succeed.
>>12936517Just keep it to yourself, you white supremacist.
>>12936545and don't forget eugenics. in fact the long term outcomes complicates this further because you can imagine for example that a ruling class would be so comfortable that they experience dysgenics while the lower class having to fight to survive experience eugenics and after some time surpass the lower class. has this actually happened in history ? there are obvious events to point to but how would you be sure about these things.
>>12931292fucking perfect example of how we get from communist dogma to neo-lamarckism eg. lysenkoism. they're genuinely too stupid to understand darwinian theory (much less actual modern genetic understanding) and fall to this by default. god i hate these trannies. i honestly hope hontrapoints goes through with the cult castration ritual and becomes another suicide statistic within a year. we need a lot more of that kind of instructive event, at this point.
>>12931292>fjords of FinlandOh just like in:Florida & Netherlands Montain rangesSwitzerland tropical beachesFrance DesertsSaudi Arabia Rainforests Germany SavannasPoland Volcanosand Greece's Ice Glaciers.Right?
>>12931292so now we know i.q. tests are bullshit.
>>12934396You’re a drooling retard, and proud of it too. The genetic component of IQ is estimated to be 60-80%https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/18/what-the-experts-really-think-about-race-realism-and-white-nationalism-or-at-least-ideas-pertaining-to-it/
>>12934425>discreditedIn what way? The studies it references are discredited? Didn’t think so. Keep pulling shit out your ass, you crying baby.
>>12934425>NOOOOO NOOOOOOO DONT LOOK AT THE DATA NOOOO NAZI NAZI NAZIIIII WAAAAAAAAAH WAAAAAH
To everybody staunchly refuting any possibility of the race IQ link:Do you think if race had an impact on cognitive abilities would this be accepted as fact by the scientific community and by society or would people try to bury it?
>>12936688>thealternativenewstruthalternativefacts dot org dot ruFunny how only klansmen use that blog as a source while we progressives use prestigious journals like Nature
>>12936707>would people try to bury itstraight into UFO conspiracy theories requiring millions of people to keep something secret with no leaks lmao
>>12936722The studies referenced in the article are published in such journals, you stupid donkey.
>>12936722>literally summarizing the scientific literature on the subject with references>ITS A NATZEE BLOG WAAAH WAAAAAHSóyboy
>>12936726No need, see >>12931953 and >>12931937
>>12936742Then explain why only nazis use it as a source. Logic isn't your strong suit, is it, Cletus.
>>12936746>*ad hominem*>"Logic isn't your strong suit, is it"wew
>>12936746It’s considered impolite in the West today to point out what the scientific literature says about race differences, to the extent that deranged people will stalk and harass you for it.
>>12936749I mean, you might as well publish on 8ch4n and then complain when nobody takes you seriously.
>>12936759So it's a gangstalking conspiracy now. Jesus christ.
>>12936766Why are you pretending to be retarded?https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1282404647160942598.htmlPeople have had their lives ruined by these deranged freaks for much, much less.
>>12936744This isn't how science works. Anybody can publish anything. You need 1) replicability, and 2) prestigious publishing source + credible news sources reporting on it being published.
>>12936779Yes and there's photographic evidence that a lady spontaneously combusted but I'm a man in black derailing your Truth Seek (tm) with "shilling."Carry on, Mulder.
>>12936763These studies *are* published in journals, though. Not sure what you’re referring to.
>>12936780>You need 1) replicabilityCheck >prestigious publishing sourceCheck>credible news sources reporting on it being publishedRetard
>>12936782>incoherent ramblingTake your meds
>>12936726You evaded my question, misrepresented my argument and made a comparison to ufo lunatics in an effort to discredit my statement.I ask again: do you believe if race iq difference were to exist, scientist would willingly publish studies proving this or would they rather not conduct these studies/not publish results/have their research ignored by the science community
>>12931723Can you explain pc1 and pc2?
>>12936780>credible news sources reporting on it being published.Clearly you've never worked in a scientific field. I work in AI and the VAST majority of research is never reported on by news outlets. Even more so when they have good reasons not to (backlash from the Twatter crowd). You are stupid as hell.
>>12936797If credible media hasn't reported on it it means in all likelyhood it's an outlier or freak occurrence, not correct and replicable.
>>12936813>he uses corporate media pundits as a substitute for literature reviews>he REFUSES to even look at the latterGod damn you really are a stupid donkey
>>12936805>do you believe that if a scientists proved god were real he would feel comfortable publishing it?>ergo, god is realMy god, you have an IQ down in the 40s. Curious how all the klansmen operate at this level while progressives have IQs in the 140s and up.
>>12936816Okay what components was being use?
>>12936827www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001081>Cognitive ability and party identity in the United States>Individuals who identify as Republican have greater probability knowledge>Individuals who identify as Republican have higher verbal reasoning ability>Individuals who identify as Republican have better question comprehension
>>12936830The components are an output, not an input. Go look up what PCA means.
>>12936833>no replicability>not reported by any credible outletTake a wild guess where you can shove it, Cletus. Right into your asshole where the DNA for your 40 IQ family tree was created.
>>12936813>>12936780>NOOOOOOOO I DONT WANT TO SEE THE PAPERS THEMSELVES I NEED SOME MEDIA OUTLET TO TELL ME WHAT TO THINKOk, see https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/to-classify-humanity-is-not-that-hard for example>uh uh uh NOOOOOOOOO I DONT LIKE THAT SOURCEThen what the fuck do you want, you drooling retard? Fucking CNN?
>>12936833Yeah your fake shit ( https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/politiqs/ ) sure showed us and disproved the thousands of studies reported weekly in New Yorker et al that prove beyond all doubt that republicans are dumber than democrats.
>>12936840>>no replicabilityhttps://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-19097-002>>not reported by any credible outletsee >>12936844
>>12936837>Principal component analysis(PCA) is the process of computing the principal components and using them to perform a change of basis on the data, sometimes using only the first few principal components and ignoring the rest.Maybe I'm a brainlet, but what was being compared between the different races?
>>12936845>he's a snopestardOf fucking course
Conservatives and nazis are dumb and it's proven by science.>Up to 16% of “conservative syndrome” is reportedly due to low cognitive ability. >Conservative countries have a low average IQ>The participants in these studies were also given a short non-verbal test of intelligence. As expected, conservative, below-the-equator countries had the lowest average score. https://theconversation.com/do-smart-people-tend-to-be-more-liberal-yes-but-it-doesnt-mean-all-conservatives-are-stupid-57713
>>12936849Your picture needs more red schizo circles.Nazis have 0 self-awareness, just lmao.
>>12936833Aren't more Democrats in college?
>>12936845Did you read the link you posted? Where's the rebuttal to the research's conclusion? It's literally just a paragraph of namecalling (par for the course for Snopes).You're so fucking dumb, dude. You're a borderline retard.
>>12936868He posted debunked misinformation from almost a decade ago, don't fall for it.
>>12936848It's a dimensionality reduction technique, with an associated error bound. Take a stat ML course.
>>12936833Niggers are overwhelmingly Democrat so they bring the average down, compare white democrats to white conservatives instead
>>12936888But Democrats had a higher score in the past according to the article tho.
>>12936888>don't compare the two things we were comparing and massage the data until you get the result we desiresounds about /sci/
>>12936868yeah, they lean towards humanities/sociology (gender studies, women's studies, etc.) and such
>>12936886Can you just tell me the point that are being compared or link me to graph sources?
This anon >>12936881 is posting debunked misinformation from almost a decade ago, don't fall for it.
>>12936900If you study a Maker group or any other stem activity associated with high IQ and good science it's almost 100% progressives also. Nazis are into plumbing and not much else. They don't even make art despite humans being into that for some hundreds of thousands of years. Straight subhuman.
>>12936900The average college IQ is in the triple digits and not a lot of Republicans go to college even if they may be relatively high in one field.
>>12936915>Nazis Nazis Nazis
>>12936923>me make two word Point in case. Your kind can't even make art and now you're devolving away from language itself. You are devolving into animals.
>>12936845>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/politiqs/so uh... where's the debunking?
>art!!!!11he's really falling apart isn't he?
Is the 'lefty' ITT being genuine or is it just a troll?
>>12936915https://scholarworks.unr.edu/handle/11714/2246>The primary purpose of this study is to bring quantitative analyses to bear on this question to determine if STEM workers, are, indeed, more conservative than others. A secondary purpose is to begin explaining why they are more conservative, if such a pattern is found. The primary research hypothesis follows Zussman (1985) and predicts that STEM workers are significantly more conservative than other workers; a secondary hypothesis is that this significant difference will remain even when controlling for key demographic variables. Regression analyses provide support for both hypotheses, which suggests that STEM workers are, indeed, more conservative than others—a pattern that may be rooted in the structure of their work, a la Kohn (1989).
>>12936956I doubt it's a troll. They're really just that stupid, in my experience.
>>12936945Population groups that nazis claim are inferior to "the whites" (not an actual population group) have made advanced art (cave paintings and sculptures) since "the whites" were still resembling monkeys more than humans. So yeah, very valid point in a discussion about IQs and the ways nazi approach the subject.
>b-b-but what about art though?!jesus
>>12936958>(1985)A lot has changed since then. A breakdown of election donations by career shows that basically only plumbers donated to republicans in 2020. All fields associated with high IQs donated more to democrats. The more IQ your career demands, the more likely that field is to be deep blue.
>>12936915>>12936932>>12936964ah yes, I sure love leftist modern """art"""
>>12936982>me Cletus me hate modernAre you a parody of a conservative or something
>>12936987>To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand modern art.
>>12936982>>12936994Honest question: Why are lefty artists obsessed with this kind of shit?
>>12937003unironically mental illness. it's part of their psychology.
>>12936972>(1985)>A lot has changed since thenThat study is from 2016 you drooling retard
>>12937003They despise what is good and beautiful
>>12937013This is really going to end up with 90%+ of leftists diagnosed as mental baskets within decades isn't it
>>12937013So I guess when a right wing extremist commits mass murder, but never went to a doctor to get a mental diagnosis, he doesn't fall into this group as having a mental illness?
>>12937036Violence is monopolized by the mentally ill side. See: 2020.
>>12937036Yes, rightoid don't believe in doctor. They are the biggest anti vax group.
>>12937013Holy hell zoomer white women are fucking mental.
>>12937046>why do 56.3% of female members of your group have a mental illness diagnosed by a doctor>well ya see all humans are like that they just don't go to the doctorNo. You are mentally ill and in a lunatic cult.
>>12937057Imagine what the stat would be if you discount random retard suburban pleb soccer moms who vote democrat just because the TV told them
>>12937062If you believe in crazy conspiracy you won't get a check up. The right believe that vaccine are evil an a bunch of other crazy stuff. What is hard to follow?
>>12937085Oh yeah let me go ahead and disregard all available evidence for your prejudiced supposition.Reminder that you are mentally ill >>12937013 >>12937026
>>12937085Leftists are much more likely to believe in shit like astrologyhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2395697
>>12937114Astrology vs>The government is trying to use vaccine to implant microchips or>Trump totally win y'all, he's going to make a grand return.
>>12937114The reality is that people in general are fucking retarded independent of political ideology. They just allow themselvrs to belive certian rediculous things based on their ideologues.
>41 unique postersThere is a very high probability that at least some are from UK or Sweden and have expressed illegal opinions. I have reported the thread to Interpol to check it out.
Who the fuck is pushing this anti IQ narrative? Is it stupid people?
>>12936746The sources are in the article you fucking retard. Its no different then cited some journalLarping pol tard you made this after seeing ny thread on /pol/
The sad fact is, is that that not only is the black/white intelligence gap genetic, but it has been known for some time. For over 20 years it has been shown that the black/white intelligence gap increases in tests that are g loaded (genetics based) and smaller on tests that aren’t as g loaded (environment based).It is either do to ignorance or purposeful hiding that this fact is never brought up. I say this as a half black anon which wishes every day that it isn’t the case.
>>12937124You're losing so bad lololol
I have terrific farts today.
>>12931292Proof is in the pudding.Their are about 1.3 billion black Africans.1: Name a university in Africa that produces world class mathematicians, engineers, and scientists2. Name a large country in African that a person would choose to move to and raise a family3. Name the African philosopher you admire and respect 4. etc.
>>12937482>expressed illegal opinions.What a progressive and open country, truly a place of enlightenment.To think that the thought police actually exist in modern Europe.
>>12937883yes, mostly ideologically brainwashed people and trannies
>>12931728>be Inca>coarse black hair>smallest frame on earth>copper skin>spanish arrive>white, varied eye colour, tall, bearded>r-race doesnt exist!
>>12931728It's the opposite though, 86% of top international scientists when polled said that there was at least some genetic difference in intelligence https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/
>>12937883Marxists, bioleninists, neo-Lysenkoists
>>12940896Says nothing regarding race, nor that it explains 80% of variation.
>>12931292guys i think OP is a midwit
>>12931454This fjord is rightful Finnish clayhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pechenga_Bay
>>12931454vuono is the finnish term
>>12931292>VaushWhy should I give two shits about this obese fuccboi's opinion?
>>12936867>t. retard actually believes biden didnt fall down
>>12931292Holy shit man>Your brain's in your skull! It's inside! It can't be altered by outside because it's inside!
>>12937003Different state of mindUntil you experience it you won't understand, but once you do, you get it.
>>12931902>this gets replies on 2021 4chan
>>12931723Isn't that boomerang shape an artifact of shittily done statistics? Something about components not being linearly independent something
>>12931902Fuck off back to r/science
>>12931324>people like this go around calling others nazis What a world we live in.
>>12931728This has to be bait. How do you think DNA-tests test for geographical ancestry?
>>12932548>race has no biological basisPeople who make this claim are the same people who use DNA tests to test for geographical ancestry
>>12936722https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/neu.10160There you go, retard
>>12932548race is a word and the categorizations/boxes are culturalbut to say there's no biology at play is fucking retarded
>>12945567this is why until the 60's great brainwashing most people didn't use to consider communists as actual human beings
>>12945601>use DNA tests to test for geographical ancestryit is possible to also obtain geographical information from DNA by the way
>>12931324I know its morally reprehensible to say that but I'm so disgusted by this subhuman. It's so rare that I'm disgusted and low in empathy, but this guy is just exactly everything I dislike. I don't even care about the points he makes. This dude lacks fundamental intuitions and contexts in order to appear worthwhile to me. Tasteless subhuman with obvious low class genetics
>>12932548can't believe retards fall for this bait
>>12936964> DAAAAA NAAAZZZIIIIIISSSSSSSstop larping pol tard and stop sperging about nazis for fucks sake.
>>12936972Its from 2016 you retard it was referencing another study from the sixties. Fucking cancerous anti white leftoid.
>>12946383Nothing in the post you quoted is false. I've seen the data he or she is referencing. Only a few fields like plumbing and "president" of a small business donated more to rethuglis than demos. All other fields and espesielly high IQ ones were overwhelmingly demo.
>>12946413All you said was that the authorities and elites are democrat. Meaning republicans are almsot purely supported by voters and republicans espically in modern day have higher iqs. Remember democrats were lefty in the slightest back then when they were based.> high iqRead a book
What conclusion can we draw from this thread?
>>12948441Progressives/democrats are 140+ IQ based on this sample
>>12948473Stop larping, you're a pol tard who saw my thread dunking on vaush so you made this thread as b8. You already got btfoed and cant source your claims then you say stupid shit like that.> iq is fake and cant evolve> lefties have high iqsEven tho they dont at all and you cant source anythingCope Seethe Dialate
>>12949793None of your post makes sense. Especially the made up words like dialate.Nothing against schizos, Terry was cool.
>>12931292It mentally hurts to listen to his argument, how does one become so disconnected from reality?
>>12949928I'm on the X, I'm on the Codeine (woo, yeah)
>>12931292but he has glasses and speaks with an americanized received pronunciation. he must be smart
>>12931865Why do these kinds of people fail to realize they aren't living at The End of History, and this stuff will only make things so much worse when racial realists get power?Instead of "blacks are less intelligent on average, but we care more about individual intelligence" civilization is going to swing into full on "I don't care about the exceptions, put them all in camps." because identity politics has completely ruined nuance.
>>12935657Whites can trace part of their dna to Neanderthals while no such trace can be found in Africans. This pol talking point is moot
>>12950164So can asians. And neanderthals had larger brains than we do.
The leftists in this thread have to be falsflagging rightwingers.
>>12951011All subspecies are the same idiot. not a biology class in you at all.
>>12931292Nice bait. Seems everyone had taken it.>>12931324I don't understand how someone can be deradicalized by Vaush. Like who in their right mind is a neo-nazi then suddenly switches sides once a fat neckbeard goblinfucker says nazis are ebil and disliking trannies is the same as being Hitlurrr!!!
>>12951318Why would a neonazi think that liking hitler is bad?
>>12951339I don't understand it either, but apparently a number of "altrighters" are deradicalized by Vaush, who calls everything he hates fascism.
>>12951318>>12951368I was an altright neonazi trumpist until I came across his twitch streams. He made me understand that I should join the right side of history and try to be a moral personage that embraces trans people reading books to children.
>>12933289Sheieiit, Same with children, everyone is 100iq. Da Baby for president now
>>12931292measuring sameness for unique systems we don't understand is funny
I never understood why so much weight is put on IQ. Not even mentioning any biases in the tests used, intelligence is a very subjective concept.Whenever I see any studies about intelligence, I can't take them seriously because I don't know what "intelligence" is supposed to mean. It's not clearly measurable.It's like if I did a study on what sports are more "fun". What the fuck does fun mean here and how are you measuring it?
>>12931375Correct. We now know up to 30 snps which influence eye color, and that number will almost surely expand further.
>>12953732>any biases in the tests usedLike?>intelligence is a very subjective conceptNot really.>Whenever I see any studies about intelligence, I can't take them seriously becausethey contradict your ideology.
>>12931479>There exists aboriginals smarter than japanesename one
>>12953835>Like?>Not really.>they contradict your ideology.Very enlightening post anonIQ tests inherently are biased because of the rest of my post. What does "intelligence" mean and how do you measure it? Since you can't definitively answer these questions you can't infer any meaning from studies.
>>12931728>papers in prestigous journals with vice article titles
Intelligence is a encoding problem,evolution can not SELECT for intelligence because its impossible to PREDICT.If you use a tool, i.e a rock to crakc a nut, evolution will optimize the rock.
>>12931728>There's literally 10k+ Jews claiming they've never done anything wrong yet alone perpetuated compulsive evil against all of humanity for over 5000 years
>>12950164>Whites can trace part of their dna to Neanderthals while no such trace can be found in Africans.1 drop rule. we different species now
>>12954527>https://streamable.com/i6m4e8full blown kto kogo there. (who, whom)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who,_whom%3Fthe rightness or wrongness of conduct doesn't depend on the conduct itself but instead who is doing the conduct and who is the recipient of it.real communist thinking
>>12954527also there was a real problem with muslim rape gangs targeting australian women for being australian women around 10 years ago in australia. vaush has no idea about how anything works in other countries in the world.
>>12954852How much of that archaic ghost human species do africans carry?
>>12953882Intelligence is tough to define in a general sense but most people who use iq studies define by the criteria that correlate with iq. Being academic and economic success.
>>12950164So you are saying there are genes there are present only in one race and not in the others? Interesting. I recall race deniers proclaiming the exact opposite. It's good you guys are learning a thing or two.
>>12936845They are not even talking about the same study.
>>12936840>>not reported by any credible outlet>HuffPost journo hasn't written any article on it so you must be wrongThis is not the take I was expecting to hear.
>>12936972>The more IQ your career demands, the more likely that field is to be deep blueThis is not really true
>>12934396This is actually mainstream view among American psychologists. And has been at least since the 1980s.
>>12951318the nazis (political party) was only evil at the very top and only in the end of their time.Tranny hatred is the same as any other hatred, that doesn't mean I'm gonna stop lmao.
>>12953732>I never understood why so much weight is put on IQ.It's the best predictor of life outcomes we have. And it explains virtually all of racial inequality there exists in society.
>>12953732>I never understood why so much weight is put on IQ. Because humans are lazy. It's an easy, cheap method to categorize populations without analyzing the actual aptitude of each individual within said population. You don't need to worry about whether or not the individual's cognitive ability was affected by factors such as poor prental health. You just grab several thousand people at random, put them into groups, test them and compare the results. Rinse and Repeat until you get normed tests to assess averages.The problem is only recently have society noticed that while IQ can easily identify the retarded, it cannot easily identify the autistic (neets), schizophrenic (conspiracytards) and psychotic (egotists). All the later being just as detrimental as the former.
>>12931324i am in danger of taking "X doesn't respect the age of consent" as seriously as i currently take "X is a racist"gj i guess
>>12955743>And it explains virtually all of racial inequality there exists in society.False, it explains the inequality by genetic stock not by race. For instance most ethnic asian minorities in China have IQs between 85-95 but because the ethnic Han are the most populous group in China the national average is considered 105. Thus it hides IQ differences between genetic stock and provides an illusion of a general racial average. Same thing happens in other regions globally like India where the national IQ is 82 but the high caste Brahmins can populate all parts of academia, or if you see some black immigrant in engineering/medicine it's usually a ethnic Igbo Nigerian.
>>12931723Regardless of what metrics PCA was used on (which, if not specified, makes PCA astrology for smooth-brained popsci goblins), I literally see clear gradients between all clusters, including between Asia and America. The gap with Africa could have shittons of causes from lacking data to misleading scaling. You’d have to be incredibly fucking retarded to look at this graph, think “yeah, Africans are more different from Middle-Easterns than Americans are from Oceanians” and nod your head like it makes sense.Please pray to Odin with all the make-believe force that your heart has that you’re never outed as the guy spamming this board every day with “only Nazis actually care about science” threads.