There's hope for incels.
Sexbots are the only hope
>>12574013No, incel blackpill theory basically completely dehumanized me. I don't want a girlfriend anymore. I want to destroy humanity itself and the universe if possible.
>>12574017This. Who even wants to be with human women any more? Judging by marriage and fertility rates in the West, not many.>>12574023Would this not make you a volcel rather than an incel?
>>12574013I don't trust Google to deliver my search results unpozzed, why should I trust it to find me a mate?
>>12574013Would require years of trial an error, would have to experiment to death, and have participants personally write their gripes and what exactly went wrong in the relationship, but yes, it could theoretically give us perfect matches. People would have to give an extremely personal and detailed blog to the AI, and let it know their darkest secrets of their personality, but it could find someone that fits like a lego or tetris block with you.
>>12574160It will never work because you could have the perfect match on paper, yet they will still break up because one of them was bored with perfection. Plus, it is well known how much the pill fucks with women's attraction and desires. Setting her up with the perfect man when she's on the pill will only be a turn-off when they want to have children.
>ai matches 10 women with one man
>>12574101That's pretty much the reaction I had when Facebook announced its dating app. Who would trust Zuckerberg and company to have your best interests in mind?
>>12574178Indeed but we could account for that. Tbh onest it doesnt need to be as rigid. The AI could set them up for a date and then human nature would take over. The hard part would be to account for beauty.Do you match only by personality or do you create different "leagues" depending on each individual's beauty?Also what counts as success? Short fun or longevity?
>>12574229You should look at the matchmaker AI Japan is trying to create, they are ignoring things like wealth, age, looks and status and focusing on personality and interests. Somehow, I don't think it's going to do that well because like it or not, those things matter to people.
>>12574249Agreed. Date matching is complicated due to the many factors that come into play. Imagine pairing A well to do lawyer with a hood rat. Not great. >they are ignoring things like wealth, age, looks and statusThey are all fundamental to who you'll date. Though on the other hand these factors mold your personality, so who knows.
>>12574292>Imagine pairing A well to do lawyer with a hood ratWell you know how women like their bad boys. May actually be a good pairing. For about 2 months.Reminds me of a /r9k/ thread a while back where black men who did well for themselves were bitching about how black women who did well for themselves were still going after ghetto trash drug dealers. Honestly, a sexbot ai would be easier to make than an ai that understands women.
>>12574320>Honestly, a sexbot ai would be easier to make than an ai that understands women.Pretty much
>>12574017Based. There are no women who would want to be with me, hence better matchmaking models would not help me in any way.
>>12574017This, otherwise expect your bitter looksmatch to look like groot.
>>12574320>Honestly, a sexbot ai would be easier to make than an ai that understands women.>he wants to have his emotional needs fulfilled by a consumer product
dating apps are designed to keep their users on the apps
>>12574554>he wants to have his emotional needs fulfilled by a consumer productBetter than a woman, which wouldn't fulfill them at all.
>>12574017>>12574013Just wait a while longer, we're all going to make It bros!
>>12574023Same, but without the incel blackpill part.
>>12574013Cope. The whole point of AI is that it'll have the ability to reject your dweeb ass.
>>12574013No thanks, I prefer 2D.
>>12574554>he wants to have his emotional needs fulfilled by a consoomer
>>12574017>>12574013Just remove the procreation drive all together. That way, our focus can be on improving our lives instead of wasting it on chasing women/cumming. We spend so much of our time searching for the best porn/women that it could effectively be used for something more productive
>>12577582Productive for who?
>>12577582Honestly and don't take this as an insult, this sort of strictly reductive approach is kind of infantile. Sci-fi has been considering this for ages, and so far as social stability and enjoyment, the better systems tend to be those that flatten social variation, limit and manage fertility, and decouple sexual intimacy from the notion of family and children. It becomes more of a bonding / fun mechanism, like in bonobos. People more readily view each other and our respective inner worlds as places to explore, although th diminished attachment necessarily cheapens and limits the depth of connection. In such societies everyone would date everyone, as family is no longer an organizing principle in their lives (work and pleasure is), nor is it connected to status. Elimination of STDs is obviously necessary as well. Theologically, you could consider this killing God and thwarting his design once and for all. Whether it's good or not is debateable.Personally I like feminine beauty and the ability to enjoy and find meaning in cooming occaionally. The idea of becoming an asexual robot just doesn't seem like a proper solution, nor progress. For what benefit would we condemn ourselves to an eternal childhood? It makes no sense.
I'm engineering a race of thick beautiful amazon women and cute small dudes with big dicks.
>>12577610For yourself. Chasing women/cumming don't help you at all. It only alleviates the problem of not cumming on the immediate day. Thats all it is. Meanwhile if you could do away with cooming mentality, chasing women, imagine having 20%-40% more time to yourself.
>>12574023You just literally need to have sex to change your mind.
>>12577730No Anon, it is not too long, and you will be compelled to read it. If not before cooming, then after.