[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/qa/ - Question & Answer


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



reminder that 3d is better than 2d
>>
File: 1560299864862.jpg (55 KB, 765x801)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>2789591
>>
File: thinkin bout disgust.png (415 KB, 628x551)
415 KB
415 KB PNG
please go away
>>
>>2789591
This traumatizes the weeaboo
>>
they need to be reminded
>>
File: 1558310456129.webm (1.86 MB, 640x1138)
1.86 MB
1.86 MB WEBM
Breasts > shit cheeks
>>
Fucking gross. It's easy to tell when someone's overweight because the quality of the skin looses it's uniformity and you can see stretch marks abound. On a nice, toned ass the texture is continuous like a sphere, but it's very clearly "blotchy" here with areas of more and less fat. Not to mention the absurd size difference from the width of the shoulders compared to the hips.

Needless to say, 2D doesn't have these problems.

Pic related is of a nice good butt, though.
>>
dummy thicc
>>
File: 1501410899464.jpg (604 KB, 905x1152)
604 KB
604 KB JPG
3d is usually better
>>
File: 1547038389594.png (134 KB, 667x720)
134 KB
134 KB PNG
>>2789591
disgusting



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.