File: ---_0367.jpg (569 KB, 2020x2000)

569 KB JPG

If you post some photos you've taken with it we could really asses the case :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2018:11:05 12:42:52
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2020
Image Height	2000

It's a fun EDC and works well for me as second camera. Though ideally focal length I'd prefer for it would be a 40 mm equivalent, not 35 mm.

>>4255762
It’s bad, not mediocre. Xtrans was a mistake and the lens stuck to it is trash. Just buy a sony a7c and any 35mm f2.8.

>>4255762
did the dust settle? What are the phototubers and tiktokers hyping up nowadays? film cams?

It seems like a pretty damn good camera if you want a fixed 35mm. What's the problem?

>>4255768
>It's a fun EDC
You carry a camera on a strap daily?

>>4255776
Not them, but yes I do on a wrist strap.

>>4255776
Quite doable with cameras of this side, just put it on cross-body and forget about it. GRs are even smaller, I used to have one on me pretty much all the time.

>>4255781
>forget about it
>forget about your camera
you dont take photos

>>4255773
pixii, 256GB edition

Dunno, seems like it works as a P&S pretty well. I'm probably gonna buy the next x100 as a second camera.

>>4255783
Forget about it until you want to take a photo lmao, do I really have to spell it out for you?

isi outshot everyone on this board with one

>>4255793
oh so you take photos like a tourist

File: file.jpg (4.72 MB, 4928x3264)

4.72 MB JPG

>>4255802
Yes. These cameras are perfect to have under your jacket, say, when you're cruising on your motorcycle down the coast and the sunset surprises you. Times you'd never have your big camera with you.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:03:28 17:48:01
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	140
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Brightness	4.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>4255804
Ever tried the GRIIIx?

>>4255806
I like 28s, never been a fan of 40. But if you like 40, GR form factor is pretty great.

>>4255768
Weather sealed griiix never ever

>>4255798
Isi sucked. Lots of quantity 0 quality but a huge ego. And a gearfag troll.

>>4255804
These cameras are frankly huge and a suicycle rider having one doesn’t surprise anyone because they blend in with the armor padding you tards have to wear to avoid losing half your skin to a wet leaf

>>4255762
You killed small body fuji production.
And you caused XE-4 and X-pro prices to shoot up to dumb prices.

>>4255818
A GR2 is tiny lol. Small enough where I can comfortably wear it under my armor suit if it rains. An x100 is easy enough to manage outside the armor - I don't have an issue riding with an x-e2 + 23mm either, but an x100 would be way more compact.
I have a lot of risky hobbies - the GR goes skiing with me too.

File: Fujifilm-X100V-vs-Sony-Cy(...).jpg (38 KB, 720x325)

38 KB JPG

>>4255762
>A mediocre camera
Absolutely

It was a larpers toy for people that were too poor and shit to afford film for how many snapshits they had to burn through to get to one good pic but still wanted the outwards appearance of a rich tourist or art hipster with a leica. It really appealed to girls apparently because everything in a womans life is a fashion statement here in the west.

For real photographers other than homos and white women, micro four thirds, 1" pocket cams, the nikon 1 and pentax Q, etc were always better and because of this the average body of work of a 2023 canon powershot g9x user is better than the average body of work of a 2023 x100* user.

>>4255854
>It was a larpers toy for people that were too poor and shit to afford film for how many snapshits they had to burn through to get to one good pic but still wanted the outwards appearance of a rich tourist or art hipster with a leica. It really appealed to girls apparently because everything in a womans life is a fashion statement here in the west.

So it's for poor people who are trying to show off? What's the brand of non-poor gear you have to obviously not show off?

File: tumblr_oc9tiq0ZuL1sqheyko(...).png (391 KB, 993x723)

391 KB PNG

>>4255860
>Cameras
>Stealth wealth
>Wealth, at all
they're a middle class flex for the underachieving couldabeen sausage party at best, like omega watches, gibson guitars, and harley davidson motorcycles. doing this gearfag shit adds absolutely nothing to your life but a misplaced sense of satisfaction and membership in a club that includes socially challenged construction foremen and middle aged suburbanites who work for google. might as well buy snap on tools. in fact, tools are a great analogy. geeks and boomers stock the best and never use them. they have blue collar capital power if you are a hard worker and know how to use them, but are limited in their association with success.

all social value in owning a camera only applies to total fuckwits AKA forum gearfags, hardware geeks, pixel peepers, yknow

anything that even looks like a flex in cameras only does so because it's loosely associated with something ie: hanging out with celebs, that you cant approach just by buying it, and that only other nerds know that much about anyways, so it's totally pointless.

No one respects the camera you HAVE AND USE, they respect the camera you HAVE TO USE. for instance a typical wedding photographer with a a9iii receives the same amount of woah as one with a 5div because they're fucking wedding photographers. and no one whose opinion matters knows that much about cameras beyond how professional they look and that your very awesome and respectable clientele finds them satisfactory.

>>4255871
I am of the opinion that studio lighting and backdrops are simultaneously the biggest casual flex to impress your fellow /p/hailures and the one gear purchase that reliably actually does anything for your work if you use them at all.

It’s also extremely liberating. Autofocus? High ISO? Whazzat?

>>4255874
INTRODUCING

https://youtu.be/G7j2ecKeQTY?si=Et4JbbXS35HEGpqV

>>4255885
Jenna actually ended up going pro.

you can plainly see from any mention of an x100 on this board for the past year that the dust has not settled. and these epin contrarians will probably continue to kick up dust until the next big thing comes along for them to tirelessly post about not liking

>>4255897
Based Jenna

>>4255901
It’s because they themselves are threatened by their own perceived brandfaggory. So when the normie masses come swarming into photography, it feels superior to talk about them and their shit shallow takes in cameras, as if gatekeeping is one of the few things that make them happy in life.

i know rite! it's almost as if some people like it, and some people don't like it! michelle obama == michael obama. earth flat. 911 inside job. got em. got em all

>>4255897
No she didn't you retard, she got a job and not as a photographer. Learn how to decipher basic LinkedIn padding.

>32 posts
>not a single argument for or against x100v

>>4256049
It is relativelylarge and the photos it takes are very low quality for a camera that costs as much as a used full frame body and a much better lens. Also the fake film camera ergos suck. The new x100v is a sony a7c. The saddest part is the a7c’s weather sealing is better if you get a G series lens or a third party prime with good seals. Pick the 24 f2.8, 40 f2.5, or 50 f2.5, set auto ISO to 3200 max, jpeg to m fine, and tweak a picture profile until you like the colors. Enjoy snapshitting for $1500 ish.

>>4256063
No the saddest part is unless you shoot at high ISOs you get better quality from micro four thirds. Xtrans is shit, literally defective by design for blocky shit noise that still looks nothing like film (FOVEON is what looks like film). The lens on it is shit. The result is double shit anywhere that isn't the dead center of the image.

The only reason it even does somewhat well at high ISOs is because xtrans has less color resolution, so the colors are already inaccurate and poorly distinguished just like if you maxed out the chroma noise reduction slider in post. All for a rare problem (moire) that is a simple mask and slider edit that only needs to be sloppily applied to a minority of images.
https://medium.com/@nevermindhim/x-trans-the-promise-and-the-problem-31407fa43452
It gets even worse with the new fuji cameras because PDAF cells are occupying most of the formerly green photosites. The end result is a sensor so resolution it can get severely mogged by a panasonic gh6. Does anyone here think being low resolution with shit colors is the film look? You should stop shooting superia 400 and having thedarkroom.com do your scans then.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_x100v&attr13_1=omsystem_om5&attr13_2=sony_a7c&attr13_3=nikon_zfc_studio&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=400&attr16_1=400&attr16_2=400&attr16_3=400&attr126_1=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=0.8629625562753924&y=0.17292842824414983

File: x-trans-cmos-iii-vs-4-pda(...).jpg (139 KB, 600x477)

139 KB JPG

>>4256081
>*a sensor so low resolution
There was a conspiracy theory going around that fuji has to stick to xtrans despite knowing it was a mistake because it's the only way sony will sell them their better sensor technology, as if the X-T5 and X-H2 had bayer filters instead, they would make a mockery of the entire sony APS-C line, and 40mp on APS-C is high resolution enough to "solve moire" on its own.

>>4256081
>formerly green
The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", where feed and seed both end in the sound "-eed", thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was "Formerly Chuck's", implying that the two words beginning with "F" and "S" would have ended with "-uck", rhyming with "Chuck". So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called "Chuck's Fuck and Suck".

>>4255769
fpbp

>>4255789
wtf I love youtubers now
Pixii is unironically based and one of the few non-archaic looking rangefinders, not to mention an ACTUAL RANGEFINDER unlike the wormy pieces of shit.

>>4255854
Hello, based department?
>>4255860
It is, because it's a faux Leica.
>>4255871
What's wrong with tool truck tools? Unlike digital cameras those can be a lifetime purchase.

>40 posts
>not a single relevant photo
/p/ - Photography

I exclusively used a griii during the last 2 years living in the Netherlands, during which I even won some awards, but after moving to Sicily and realizing how dusty that part of the world is I traded it in for first an M9 (not corroded but it's only a matter of time) and then a 100v.

The m9 was just too big for my run and gun style but the 100v is perfect. All the talk about inching out sensor performance feels mute to me. These things are used on fashion shoots by world-class photographers, and the 100v definitely sharper and with better dynamic range than the M9 with my various voigtlanders.

To fine camera (a delight to use, which surely counts for a lot) and I'll probably stick with it in the foreseeable future.

>>4255854
i shot exclusively on a pair of rx100's for a couple years - i was very happy. bought an x100v just to have something with some weather resistance. it was fun to shoot, spit out nice files that didn't need much if any work to look their best, but it somehow felt like more of a toy than my pocketsnoy ever did.

>>4255769
a7c looks like iPhone pics.

>>4256314
>100v definitely sharper and with better dynamic range than the M9 with my various voigtlanders.
Larp

>>4256411
User error. A7Cs are used on fashion shoots by world class beauty photogs.

I’m a rich fashion photographer and we all use nikon DSLRs.

>>4255871
Taylor is just like me!

I like the results from the sensor. I borrowed a friends xpro 3 on and off for like a year since he was one of those people who bought a camera and never used it. The film simulations were great though the jpegs were just a hair over sharpened. Not sure why I didn't go with Fuji but I've been using a canon r5 and have been extremely happy with the results, but it's absolutely a work camera rather than a fun walkabout type of thing.

>>4256414
Why larp, it's like a 15 yo camera. I've used an m10 and I know the dynamic range on those things is crap. You shoot at low ISO or you don't shoot at all.

>>4256414
>A7Cs are used on fashion shoots by world class beauty photogs.
Nobody cares.

>>4256415
>>4256414
lmao the seethe

>>4256535
I work for conde nast and the nikon comment is accurate.

>>4255768
>Though ideally focal length I'd prefer for it would be a 40 mm equivalent, not 35 mm.
so do a tiny crop jesus fucking christ

strip the exif if youre shooting an x100 and posting here. say its a dslr if anyone asks

>>4255762
Yes it is. Like most Fujifilm cameras.

>>4255854
The fujifilms made me go back to film.
Even a fed 3 feels like the real deal in comparison to theses faux classic digicams.

>>4255824
I hate this.

I bought one for my wife just before the prices jumped up, but it was just too big for her and she kept taking my gr instead. So I ended up having it around and it's been absolutely wonderful.

It's sharper than the GR, and is actually a joy to use. You can run with it in a pouch or under your jacket and it's fine which makes it ideal for Street. And the ovf is kind of amazing. My only complaint is that it's not that ergonomic without the thumb grip, and that it looks a bit like an expensive toy which can draw attention. No one ever looked at my gr twice.

>>4255802
You are such a fucking moron its not even funny. To think that a human being went through the effort to carry and nurture you for 9 months to just have such a low iq disappointment to pop out.. Jesus...

>>4255762
I think you are a great camera. Wish your prices were not that high. I have settled for a used XT3 by the end but cant wait to buy you in some years when the price is down.
Till than I am with my XE1 27mm as EDC

>>4255802
Unwanted child tier post

>>4255762
rent free

File: 1701315774367.gif (811 KB, 128x128)

811 KB GIF

>>4255762
Shit was always mid. What bothered me was they never updated the AF on the lens. It still has the old school loud chattery motor. Cant they update the motors to be silent or something? Why else are people paying hundreds more for every new revision? You would think that would be the first thing to fix. The second thing that annoys me is how large it is. Its not compact at all as people claim it to be and again, theyve never made it more compact with each revision.

>>4259616
fujifags have always been a bit dim

>>4256081
Huh, I like OM colors most up to ISO 800 then it goes to Nikon after that

>>4255769
the lens on x100v is the upgraded one from x100f and it is perfect. I have one and shoot wide open and it's tack sharp so fuck off cunt. Stop judging cameras based on opinions of an average /p/-tard.

File: 2023-10-09_16-56-26_000.jpg (1.35 MB, 1707x2560)

1.35 MB JPG

Love mine. Whenever i run out the door and i need more than my phone but don't want to bring my main camera it does the job perfectly. Also love the leaf shutter and i can do fill backlight with any shutter speed. OVF is also great to compose as you can see outside the frame.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X100V
Camera Software	Digital Camera X100V Ver3.01
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:10:14 15:29:37
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	9.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 2023-10-08_18-16-06_000.jpg (1.74 MB, 1707x2560)

1.74 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X100V
Camera Software	Digital Camera X100V Ver3.01
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:10:14 15:15:53
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/3.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/3.6
Brightness	8.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 2023-10-07_16-28-32_000.jpg (1.14 MB, 1707x2560)

1.14 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X100V
Camera Software	Digital Camera X100V Ver3.01
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:10:14 14:53:19
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	6.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 2023-10-08_19-08-29_000.jpg (808 KB, 1707x2560)

808 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X100V
Camera Software	Digital Camera X100V Ver3.01
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:10:14 15:27:53
Exposure Time	1/300 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Brightness	6.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 2023-07-25_19-52-59_000.jpg (681 KB, 1707x2560)

681 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X100V
Camera Software	Digital Camera X100V Ver2.13
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:07:25 19:52:59
Exposure Time	1/210 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Brightness	6.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1707
Image Height	2560
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Soft
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

Is there a good/ok camera with interchangeable lenses of the size of the GR?

>>4259691
>>4259692
Nice lighting and colors.

File: Sony-RX100-VII-beauty02.jpg (48 KB, 590x393)

48 KB JPG

>>4259712

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 80D
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual

>>4259712
Oly EP7 comes to mind
It's slightly bigger, but barely

>>4259728
thanks anon

>>4259712
>>4259728
Panasonic GM5 but they're expensive now because people never let go of them

>>4259616
The size is nice - I had the original x100, though long ago gave it to my wife. I also have the x-e2 and the ricoh GR. X100 is right in between, doesn't feel like an ultra compact, while still being quite small. Very nice in your hands.
I also have Canon RF and EF bodies - they all have their uses.

>>4256498
I agree with the over sharpening, I think that’s why most of the film sim recipes tend to drop the sharpness setting to -1 or -2

>>4259712
EOS M + 22mm f/2

I'm insane.

>>4256179
Haven’t been here before today since back when Yall was fucking his sister ten years ago, and it’s good to see nothing has changed

>>4255802
you are a fucking spastic and i hate you

File: 3d0030c07257a02b515c3a658(...).gif (2.61 MB, 540x350)

2.61 MB GIF

>>4260869
Thread's going so fast no one will know