[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 100 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: film general.png (118 KB, 287x286)
118 KB
118 KB PNG
Film on film edition.

Post film photos (or don't, I'm not your boss) and discuss gear I suppose.
Old thread - >>4245134
>>
/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit
>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years
>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited
>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process

FAQ
>What should my first film camera be?
If you have a DSLR system. Get a camera that shares the same lenses. If not, something in the vein of cameras like the Canon A-1 or a Pentax Super Program or a Nikon FA should work.
>Why is film so expensive, it wasn't like this 5 years ago!
It's either "the Jews did this" or "get a job Jamal". Choose accordingly.
>Is medium format worth getting into?
No. Unless you like the look and workflow.
>How to digitize negatives?
Have a modern camera? Get a macro lens and try scanning with that. Otherwise hunt down some old dedicated film scanner like a Minolta or a Nikon (or that one good Canon). With a medium format you could use a flatbed scanner but the quality will be so so...

Useful links
>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film development
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
>[film dev] shows results of development regimes
https://filmdev.org/
>[news & community links]
35mmc.com
casualphotophile.com
kosmofoto.com
emulsive.org
japancamerahunter.com
>>
>>4250661
I thought we decided not to include this massive block of text?
>>
File: testrollresize.jpg (1.24 MB, 1000x1544)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
I picked up a nikon 301 as untested to replace my fg because the light meter stopped working, Only had to clean the battery contacts and it seems to be working perfectly

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2922
Image Height4512
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2023:11:07 02:53:49
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height1544
>>
File: testroll2.jpg (1.91 MB, 1000x1546)
1.91 MB
1.91 MB JPG
>>4250665

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2933
Image Height4533
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2023:11:07 02:54:22
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height1546
>>
File: testroll3.jpg (908 KB, 1000x646)
908 KB
908 KB JPG
>>4250667
can't remember if these were 500t or 250d, think it was a roll of 500t tho

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4332
Image Height2797
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2023:11:07 02:55:11
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height646
>>
File: testroll4.jpg (833 KB, 1000x646)
833 KB
833 KB JPG
>>4250668

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4543
Image Height2933
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2023:11:07 02:55:45
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height646
>>
>>4250663
I admit it's not a good sticky, but not having a sticky text at all is worse IMO.
We could throw out the stuff about expired film and the "news & community links"
>>
File: raw0025.jpg (924 KB, 1500x992)
924 KB
924 KB JPG
one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelLS-2000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:06 17:22:55
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1500
Image Height992
>>
File: raw0026.jpg (947 KB, 1500x992)
947 KB
947 KB JPG
two

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelLS-2000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:06 17:22:57
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1500
Image Height992
>>
File: raw0027.jpg (970 KB, 1500x992)
970 KB
970 KB JPG
three

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelLS-2000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:06 17:22:59
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1500
Image Height992
>>
File: trichrome small.jpg (1.95 MB, 1500x1000)
1.95 MB
1.95 MB JPG
Chroma!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelLS-2000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:06 17:33:54
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1500
Image Height1000
>>
i've been liking fomapan 400 in a small plastic point and shoot i can pocket with rodinal semi-stand. how do fomapan 100 and 200 differ? they worth checking out? if it's just trading grain for iso i wont bother.
>>4250691
this one's best
>>
File: TriX001013.jpg (772 KB, 900x1350)
772 KB
772 KB JPG
>>4250692
Those wheels make me sick. I curse them with porosity.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 550D
Camera SoftwareDigital Photo Professional
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number1132529712
Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2014:03:29 10:15:36
Exposure Time0.8 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width900
Image Height1350
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeTimed
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Self-Timer Length10 sec
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceCustom
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix129
>>
File: 003.jpg (1.84 MB, 1500x1500)
1.84 MB
1.84 MB JPG
Guys I've spent the last 3 weekends with my dream girl shooting film it's fucking great.
>>
>>4250892
>tfw took a photo of the girl that I liked this weekend, she later went out with her boyfriend

purple_ryan_gosling.jpg
>>
>>4250692
>those colors
holy soul

>>4250892
Well, I'm jelly. I spent a day with my dream girl too but unfortunately I'm not her dream guy. I'd rather get punched in the gut than feel this feel.
>>
>>4250692
Learn how to take photos some day, yeah? Because this is fucking shit. Or is this as good as we can expect from what looks like Afghanistan.
>>
>>4250921
Does she know that?
>>
>>4250946
>Afghanistan
do they even have trees there?
>>
>>4250946
What would you have done differently?
>>4250880
Buy me a set of countersunk steelies babe, i got chrome hubcaps that need some love
>>
>>4250949
I'm not sure. I was aware enough to know when I shouldn't confess a thing like that and in this situation it would just ruin a good friendship. I think she has some idea anyway and we had a sort of roundabout conversation about it, not specifically mentioning us but just about how you can't choose who you like in that way, and she said she wished she could choose who she liked that way, not mentioning me but I think we had a mutual understanding. It is what it is, I guess.

On a more hopeful note, has anyone heard of this stuff with Harman (the actual company behind the Ilford film business) teasing some new product?

https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/harman-photo-cryptic-announcement-teaser.202435/

I have a (maybe ridiculous) hope that it's a new line of color film, but that may just be wishful thinking.
>>
>>4250988
>ruin a good friendship.
You’re orbiting
>>
question about old flashes (and flashes in general). the back of my old flash has apertures for a given iso and subject distance (and assuming flash ss of 1/60 i guess). at 1 metre/3 feet, 200 iso it says f22, which is EV 14.
would this be to meter for the midtone, or highlights?
what happens if there is ambient/continuous lighting too? i understand EV is based on a doubling/log scale, so EV11 room + EV 12 from flash would be equivalent to EV 12.5. is that right?
>>
File: KSop3d8.jpg (86 KB, 465x700)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>>4251011
Man, not gunna lie I shot with multiple off camera flashes for years on slide film and have no idea wtf you're talking about with relating EV to this stuff. Just set your aperture to be whatever the power + distance chart tells you. There's no reason to even think about EV.
>>
File: raw0006.jpg (869 KB, 1500x1000)
869 KB
869 KB JPG
buttsauce

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelLS-2000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:06 17:22:15
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1500
Image Height1000
>>
>>4251021
thats good to know, thanks
>>
File: E8cCd6Q.jpg (114 KB, 690x700)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
>>4251302
That said, you do still need to figure out what SS to use to get the ambient light exposed for how you want. I usually enjoyed underexposing it by 1 stop so my flash subjects popped a bit more.
>>
>>4251341
yo what film and lens are you using
>>
File: DSC_1259-positive.jpg (707 KB, 984x1488)
707 KB
707 KB JPG
Anon, question to those of you who prints photos on enlarger and shoot Kodak Double-X. How good/bad it works with mono-contrast FB paper. Is contrast too high or is it okay? How it looks on different iso?

I used to struggle with printing pushed HP5 back in the days, don't want to repeat this experience.

Pic rel Delta 400 at 3200 iso pushed in Adox XT3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareNegative Lab Pro v2.2.0
PhotographerSOP610
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern690
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:03 18:45:33
Light SourceUnknown
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>4251341
my camera only has 1 flash SS, 1/50. but thats what i dont get, your flash subjects will be EV ambient+flash and your background/environment will be EV ambient. so if i underexpose my background to be -1 and subject to be +1 or +2, the flash will be 4x brighter than the ambient and then i wont need to add the ambient light when considering the subject. i think i got it now
>>
>>4250876
100 is not worth it as its basically the same as 400
200 i think has tabular grain as opposed to the rest. i like it best of the foma bunch
>>
File: roll.png (170 KB, 1229x449)
170 KB
170 KB PNG
Just shot an expired roll and it came out like this. I'm pretty sure it was a Kodak colour negative.
Read it has something to do with the dyes breaking down although I don't know why there is a gradient. Anyone else had a similar experience?
>>
>>4251391
That was with my bronica 150mm and I think Astia.

>>4251430
I'm not aware of any camera that forces you to use only 1 SS. You should be able to use 1/50th and any speed slower than that.
>>
File: 0014_###.jpg (900 KB, 3090x2048)
900 KB
900 KB JPG
>>4251535
Just noticed that the photos I took came out blue and the ones that had been exposed 20 years ago are purple/ magenta

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.80.010 (180808)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3090
Image Height2048
>>
>>4251537
>You should be able to use 1/50th and any speed slower than that.
What the actual fuck, I completely had no idea at all. Wow. Thanks for that. I guess I gotta go mess with some flash then
>>
>>4251470
ok cool yeah i was trying to get an idea from reddit and lomography and 200 did seem a touch different, will run some through.
>>
We are locked and loaded

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3024
Image Height4032
>>
File: 1000009986-01.jpg (2.3 MB, 1025x1366)
2.3 MB
2.3 MB JPG
>>4251547
Hellya, have fun.

New camera leather doesn't match well. Guess this camera will be ugly for the next 10 years.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeGoogle
Camera ModelPixel 6a
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:08 19:10:20
Exposure Time4169/500000 sec
F-Numberf/1.7
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating407
Lens Aperturef/1.7
Brightness1.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance0.33 m
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.38 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1025
Image Height1366
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Digital Zoom Ratio1.5
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeMacro
>>
File: 32.jpg (1.26 MB, 1832x2840)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelLS-5000
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution474 dpi
Vertical Resolution474 dpi
>>
>>4251769
Gives it charm
>>
>>4250655
What'a the cheapest b&w film to bulk right now? Fomapan?
>>
>>4251922
Y
>>
>>4251966
mmm aids
>>4251922
Kentmere also
>>
>>4251968
>>4251922
why doesnt foma just rate their film at 160 instead of lying saying its 400?
>>
>>4251968
Thank you
>>4251975
There is a lot of jewery in this hobby. But hey, it's film that's not expired and relatively cheap, in a very scarce market. Bitching won't get us far now.
>>
File: 000036_crop.jpg (1.29 MB, 2000x2000)
1.29 MB
1.29 MB JPG
Hooray for cheap slide film. Though the cost of developing didn't offset the cost of the film at all.
>>4250892
Nice. I could have gone shooting with my dream girl but I kinda fucked it up (multiple times).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP500
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4252008
>slide film
>takes a photo of a fucking wall
I hate you fucking tards
>>
I was gifted the ilford simplicity black and white dev set. What chemicals can i keep to reuse? My understanding that all if it is reusable besides the dev chem and wetting agent. I’m trying ti figure out if i will need storage bottles and how many for my dev chems.
>>
>>4252062
you mean the little starter pack? I think those are like 2 rolls max of 35mm film.
By general rule you will reuse fixer and stop bath until is exhausted. Developer it depends, there is some that is one shot but there is some that can be reused.
>>
>>4252079
>reuse fixer and stop bath until is exhausted
how can you tell when they're exhausted? does it take them ruining a roll?
>>
>>4252109
when you develop film and cut the leader off, keep it labelled (what film stock it is) in a bag. before you develop with a film stock + fixer type you havent done before, drop the leader into a tiny bit of fixer (like 30ml) in a jug. shake the jug a little a few times. time how long it takes to turn see-through/clear from when you dropped it in. this is your clearing time (in seconds), write it down for that unique film stock and fixer combination. keep reusing the fixer and doing this every so often. when the time to clear is now double what it was at the start (with fresh fixer), get new fixer. also dont pour it down the sink, just buy cheap 1L glass bottles with a stopper at the top and store them until you can safely dispose. another way is to just mark down how many rolls you have put through that fixer (like a sticky note on the bottle) and stop using it after a bunch
>>
File: DSCF9687.jpg (1.96 MB, 3552x1576)
1.96 MB
1.96 MB JPG
I've got a camera and some chemicals some time ago, first time trying to develop my own film. Was pretty fun, but I think I'll be leaving the developing process to some pro shop whenever I'll decide to use film camera. So much work, so much fluids to carefully pour in and out, ugh. Was crazy fun to experience once, but for practical use, it might be too much work.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-T20
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.34
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mm
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:10:21 22:10:54
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating2000
Lens Aperturef/1.0
Brightness-2.2 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Blur StatusBlur Warning
Chroma SaturationHigh
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOn
Auto Exposure StatusOK
Flash ModeUnknown
Focus ModeManual
Focus StatusOK
Picture ModeManual Exposure
SharpnessUnknown
Slow Synchro ModeOff
White BalanceAuto
>>
>>4252012
:)
>>
>>4252109
If you pull your reel out of the soup and it looks wrong (black+gray instead of black+clear) drop it back in the soup right away and put the lid on. Then mix up some new fixer and redo that step. Your film won't be ruined unless you blasted it with a flashlight or something, it will only be lightly fogged. Or you could do a scientific test like some kinda NERD >>4252168 I'll bet that guy uses stop bath and not even vinegar like actual stop bath
>>
>>4252228
uhm actually i also use a hypo clearing agent :^)
you actually probably dont even need to put the lid back on, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Agdn3ms5jCA
>>
>>4252233
jfc imagine going this autistic over b&w I've put less effort into e6
>>
>>4252234
could you not tell i was being sarcastic? maybe you actually have autism
>>
>>4252235
just havin a giggle m8. I was referring more to your video than your comment, I don't think that guy is being sarcastic
>>
Fuck I enjoy the taste of nigga dick when I'm out shooting the streets of islamabad
>>
>>4252228
>I'll bet that guy uses stop bath and not even vinegar like actual stop bath
not him but I just use a water stop bath....
>>
File: DSC_8718.jpg (1.47 MB, 1500x1200)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB JPG
>>4252313
true dat babe

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D700
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern794
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:05:04 12:34:26
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Exposure Bias-2 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashFlash, Compulsory, Return Detected
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1500
Image Height1200
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>4252242
the point was you dont have to be autistic and shit yourself to put the lid on right away, hes literally pulling it out into the light
>>
My cinestill light source for scanning film at home just failed, it went really dim and now it no longer turns on at all (even after clicking all the buttons and trying different power/USB sources). Has this happened to anyone else?
>>
emergency question for everyone. I shot Portra 800 at 100 on accident. That means I underexposed it correct? and that I need to push it 3 stops for it to be salvageable? But I've shot expired film at lower ISO than box speed, developed normally and it was fine. Help clear the confusion.
>>
>>4252387
>I need to push it 3 stops
you need to pull it 3 stops - over exposure : push development :: under exposure : pull development

I can't say how much latitude Portra 800 has but you might be able to salvage it with a -1 or -2 stop pull.

https://thedarkroom.com/pushing-and-pulling-film/
>>
File: IMG_0011_.jpg (153 KB, 960x705)
153 KB
153 KB JPG
I found Foma 400 handles overexposure pretty well. This one was overexposed by about 5-6 stops and turned out okay

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot SX200 IS
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00
Lens Size5.00 - 60.00 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width960
Image Height705
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2023:04:15 21:52:42
Exposure Time1/5 sec
F-Numberf/3.4
Lens Aperturef/3.4
Exposure Bias0.7 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width960
Image Height705
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Image Number100-0011
Exposure ModeProgram
Focus TypeManual
Metering ModeCenter-Weighted
ISO Speed RatingAuto
SharpnessNormal
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeManual
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
Subject Distance0.100 m
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation5
Sensor ISO Speed160
>>
>>4252459

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwaredigiKam-7.9.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1024
Image Height659
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Horizontal Resolution2400
Vertical Resolution2400
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023:04:15 19:33:20
Image Width1024
Image Height659
>>
1/125s

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeReflecta
Camera ModelProScan 7200
Camera SoftwareVueScan 9 x64 (9.8.13)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width695
Image Height1024
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Horizontal Resolution1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution1800 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023:08:20 19:24:19
Image Width695
Image Height1024
>>
I'm so tired of consistently getting the dev module locked and having to reinstall some new permutation of cracked lightroom each time adobe finds some way of getting around the firewall filters...

The only reason I was really using it was for Negative Lab Pro. What's the next best substitute for LR that can do both cataloguing, raw editing and negative scan conversion that's easy enough for a sliderbrain to use.
>>
File: IMG_0353.jpg (1.95 MB, 1125x1777)
1.95 MB
1.95 MB JPG
I keep pondering how I'm going to digitalize the thousands of colornegs in 120, 126 and 135 and dias slides in my parents inventory. Even if you skim away the snapshits, there's still photos from the 40's to the mid 00's.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution216 dpi
Vertical Resolution216 dpi
Image Width1125
Image Height1777
>>
Anyone have an Olympus 35 SP?
I picked up a broken one today that I want to repair. When the film advance lever is wound, the shutter opens and stays in the open position. Once my watch spanner arrives I should be able to take the top housing off and inspect the shutter release rod.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1774
Image Height1289
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: CC94594-R1-05-31A_1.jpg (1.64 MB, 1497x1000)
1.64 MB
1.64 MB JPG
>>4252496
I have one, that lens is amazing, its my favorite one on all my cameras. I used to enjoy shooting this thing in aperture priority with the spot metering, but the metering suddenly stopped working. I guess its a loose connection or something.
Sounds like you have a mechanical problem, I would assume it will be difficult to fix but I am a clueless idiot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1497
Image Height1000
>>
File: 00001.jpg (4.04 MB, 3346x2397)
4.04 MB
4.04 MB JPG
Would I be better of getting one of those Kodak phone scanners or a Ion Slides 2 scanner?
>>4252462
Pretty cool.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3346
Image Height2397
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:09 19:07:11
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3346
Image Height2397
>>
File: CC93094-R1-16-19A_1.jpg (1.76 MB, 1497x1000)
1.76 MB
1.76 MB JPG
>>4252501
My issue with it is the focus patch is quite dim so I keep missing focus whenever I dont really take my time or shoot min or max distance. I must have hundreds of missed focus shots

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1497
Image Height1000
>>
File: CC93094-R1-00-36A_1.jpg (1.67 MB, 1497x1000)
1.67 MB
1.67 MB JPG
>>4252504

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1497
Image Height1000
>>
File: CC94594-R1-15-21A_1.jpg (1.64 MB, 1500x1000)
1.64 MB
1.64 MB JPG
>>4252505

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1500
Image Height1000
>>
File: CC94594-R1-14-22A_2.jpg (1.63 MB, 1500x1000)
1.63 MB
1.63 MB JPG
>>4252507
these have been portra 160 and 400 in the 35SP.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1500
Image Height1000
>>
Do you ever feel the itch to just turn a frame into B&W after you scan it and realize the lighting was shit? Do some photos ONLY work on B&W or is this just cope?
>>
>>4252505
This is lovely
>>
>>4252523
thanks, hail + sunshine is typical weather in Trondheim
>>
File: DSC05078editSMBDR.jpg (868 KB, 1600x1600)
868 KB
868 KB JPG
>>4252522
One of my favourite photos was shot on Provia but looks so much better as bw. Pic related is Ektachrome converted to bw cause all it recorded was blues at this depth. Converting a colour shot to bw is totally fine imo.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4250671
>>4250663
It's probably best if we condense the text walls into links that lead to a pastebin w/the text
>>
>>4250655
I finally got some velvia 50 ordered off of BnH, last I remember shooting with it though all I remember are the slides being really blue. Is there a proper way to mitigate this?
>>
>>4252550
project them and they'll be the right colour.
alternatively warming filter when shooting but then you'll have piss-vision if you try to project
>>
File: DSC05117editSMBDR.jpg (1.55 MB, 1600x1600)
1.55 MB
1.55 MB JPG
>>4252550
UV filter and don't shoot during mid day light. V50 doesn't play they nice with warming filters as they cause yellowa and reds to go overboard. Choosing the right light to shoot in is really the big thing most people drop the ball on when shooting E6. Some light will just not look good.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4252574
thats beautiful, m8
>>
File: Tom-Ford-01.jpg (3.52 MB, 1796x1626)
3.52 MB
3.52 MB JPG
>>
File: 1000015150018.jpg (1.59 MB, 2317x1536)
1.59 MB
1.59 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareCapture One 21 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2022:01:30 14:24:43
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2317
Image Height1536
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4252459
>Foma 400
oh you mean foma 80? lol
>>
>>4252574
Fair fair, bright, flat light is best for e6 film. Just have to get used to shooting it
>>
File: DSC05232editSMBDR.jpg (1.74 MB, 1600x1600)
1.74 MB
1.74 MB JPG
>>4252612
No, bright flat light is what will give you a ton of blue. You want crisp light, the kind you get in fall and winter.

>>4252576
Thx m8

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4252501

I have had some disassembly practice on a couple other vintage cameras so I will give it a go anyway. I will take pictures and notes and hopefully publish them somewhere since I can’t currently find anything about this shutter issue.
>>
>>4252504
>>4252505
>>4252509
Really nice images.
Simple cameras really are the best.
>>
File: A7R05877EOS10QDRVP100.jpg (530 KB, 2048x1354)
530 KB
530 KB JPG
>>4252550
Velvia is colour balanced for daylight.Consider it a requirement rather than a suggestion and you'll get better results.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/11.0
Brightness-1.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceFlash
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2048
Image Height1354
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4252656
Actually a blue shift happens when using tungsten stock in daylight, daylight stock looks neutral in daylight and reddish in tungsten.
>>
>>4252662
>akshully
Read my fucking post again and explain to me how what you said was an intelligent response?
If you are
>actually
retarded or dyslexic, stop posting gibberish with a trip and in this authoritative tone.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Brightness-1.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1366
Image Height2048
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4252634
>>4252656
Tyty. I've only shot one roll of v50 so I'm trying to mitigate what I saw there. Shot plenty of provia and ektachrome tho
>>
>>4252664
The dude was complaining they were TOO BLUE. The only way he's getting them shifted to blue because of white balance is shooting under fluorescent lighting or something like it.
>>
>>4252676
I can post pics later, I'm away from my archive rn
>>
you niggas got any Nikon glass recommendations?
>>
>>4252676
Or in shade, you fucking retard. Stop giving advice if you never
>akshually
take photos.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Brightness-4.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1395
Image Height2048
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: 161252491.jpeg.jpg (2.05 MB, 1804x1204)
2.05 MB
2.05 MB JPG
>>4252676
>>4252664
Here are some of them, shot on my F4S in P mode.
1/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareImageGear Version
Photographer1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1804
Image Height1204
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023
>>
File: 161252467.jpeg.jpg (2.32 MB, 1804x1204)
2.32 MB
2.32 MB JPG
>>4252696
2/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareImageGear Version
Photographer1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1804
Image Height1204
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023
>>
File: 161252460.jpeg.jpg (2.81 MB, 1804x1204)
2.81 MB
2.81 MB JPG
>>4252697
3/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareImageGear Version
Photographer1996-98 AccuSoft Inc., All rights reserved
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1804
Image Height1204
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023
>>
File: itsbluedawg.jpg (1.05 MB, 2000x1333)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB JPG
>>4252676
that isnt the only way. shooting daylight e6 on an overcast day will give you blue slides. on velvia 50 itll give you hella blue slides

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:11 20:09:15
Exposure Time1/2 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Brightness-4.3 EV
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceOther
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height1333
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4252696
the slides themselves look like this? to me, this looks like automated scanning software overcompensating for velvia's inherent magenta shadow tones, which is causing everything to be heavily cyan/green. velvia doesnt age this way. either bad scanning or bad developing, depending how slides look.
>>
>>4252696
These look about right to me. If you want to understand Velvia better, simply consult the based god Ken. But he does warm it a touch under skylight conditions (but not with a "skylight" filter, as they only emphasise the already present magenta shift in the film).
>I usually shoot it through an 81A (A2) filter at all times. In shade, I'll shoot through an 85C filter.
Personally I don't bother because it's the 21st century and I can edit my own scans for colour balance, but each to their own.
>>
>>4252705
The slides look a melenky bit better but on the whole they look overtly blue. I send in my stuff to Dwaynes photo in Kansas and learnt that the HD scans are worthit
>>
File: 162271890.jpeg.jpg (241 KB, 1694x1123)
241 KB
241 KB JPG
>>4252711
>>4252705
Here's a photo from a shot I took w/provia 100f
>>
>>4252680
Ai NOCT-NIKKOR 58mm f1.2
>>
File: 1000010136-01.jpg (2 MB, 1500x2000)
2 MB
2 MB JPG
>>4252707
>>4252711
That is not what velvia 50 looks like in daylight.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2023:11:11 22:00:51
Image Width1500
Image Height2000
>>
What are the best alternatives to lightroom? I refuse to pay a monthly fee.
>>
I have two issues currently
1) I am shooting Tri-X 400 w/ a red filter using a nikon F3. Should I adjust for the filter or shoot it as the lightmeter in the F3 says?
2) Picrel, but I am getting really fucked up colors in my color scans using epson v600 and NEGATIVELABPRO. what do yall use?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4252739
I'm assuming the F3 has ttl metering so you don't have to compensate for the filter yourself, although you can if you want to

I do dslr scanning and NLP
>>
>>4252732
Well I'll be shooting some soon so I'll be seeing if it's dwaynes processing that's fucking it up or I'm just metering wrong. Either way I'm excited for the rolls to come in.
>>
>>4251341
I got another question. I'm gonna be shooting a super close subject on a wide angle lens (50-70cm away) in daylight and I want the background to be decently underexposed (I can make it pure black in post if needed). Does this mean I'll have to use the fastest shutter speed (1/50 for my camera) at a super high aperture like f22? From what I know that will be the way to get the least light from the background as possible
>>
>>4252732
/r/'ing frame #27 good sir
>>
File: DSC06453editSMBDR.jpg (2.43 MB, 1600x1600)
2.43 MB
2.43 MB JPG
>>4252747
Wrong metering won't cause the film to go greenish like that. Hell yeah though slide is the best!

>>4252773
Yep, you're thinking correctly. You can boil it down to, shutter speed for exposing ambient, aperture for exposing flash exposure. Since your max flash sync is only 1/50th, you'll need to rely on a small aperture to bring your exposure down. If your flash exposure wants F22 and your ambient exposure is 1/15 @ F22, shooting at 1/50th will underexpose your ambient background by ~2 stops. Not to get into gear, but if you'll be doing a lot of flash work it's easy and cheap to get a camera that'll do 1/125th if not 1/250th. Leaf shutter cameras can flash sync at any speed, giving you up to 1/500 often.

>>4252810
Will post when I'm around my computer again.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4252387
shot a more sensitive film as if u were shooting a less sensitive one, it means u overexposed it so u need to pull 3 stops now like the other guy said
>>
>>4252502
very nice photo man
just out of curiosity what film/camera did you shoot it with?
>>
>>4252898
Thanks anon. It was shot with a Chinon CM-5 using Eastman Double X (Iso 200).
>>
File: fallgreen_small.jpg (2.81 MB, 1481x1500)
2.81 MB
2.81 MB JPG
new tlr appears to have builtin swing (non-adjustable)
>>
File: bench_small.jpg (2.05 MB, 1500x1500)
2.05 MB
2.05 MB JPG
just have to make sure everything I take a picture of is angled that way I guess
>>
File: tri-x107.jpg (1.23 MB, 4300x2917)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB JPG
> TFW I didn't know the beach I went to was the crusing area.
>there was a family here as well.
This is Tri-X 400 devloped in rodinal shot using a red filter.
I'm not sure how I fucked it up, but it seems a lot grainer than what I'm used to and the negative is lot darker than it should be

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2023:11:12 17:02:56
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>4250668
>>4250667
>>4250665
These were on the Nikon?
>>
>>4252680
for manual focus Nikons, I like my 105/2.5 and my 24/2.8
>>
Talk me out of buying a Wista 45
>>
File: testroll4.jpg (900 KB, 659x1000)
900 KB
900 KB JPG
>>4253219
yessir

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4543
Image Height2933
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution3200 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023:11:14 03:16:59
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width659
Image Height1000
>>
>>4251537
Nice shot
>>
the retard jannie banned me because I posted the photo of a hookers asshole. What the fuck jannie? I posted it with legitimate complaints about my photo taking process in low light. I guess no more hooker pics from me.

>also is adblock interfering with anyone else posting? I couldnt get captcha to load with ublock running
>>
>>4253259
degenerates btfo
>>
>>4253259
ahahaha gotcha bitch
>>
>>4253259
Based. You've inspired me to do it myself. But I'm gonna do it on color too. Maybe use a velvia roll
>>
Theres a functioning Super 8 at an antique store down the road from me. I really want it but have never shot film before and I feel like its a terrible idea but can't stop thinking about it

convince me not to
>>
>>4253384
just look at how much development costs
>>
File: DSC05045-1.jpg (1.3 MB, 1500x1001)
1.3 MB
1.3 MB JPG
Got very few keepers out of two rolls of slide I just scanned. Happy with this one though, E100.
Tips on how to meter when you want to be able to see a colorful sky as a part of the landscape? I've blown out several now. Just meter the sky?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:13 12:27:40
Exposure Time1.6 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness-8.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4253396
Shoot another roll and just experiment with exposure and bracketing.
It'll tell you more than just some words on the internet.
>>
>>4251537
These are great! Do you have an instagram or something to check more out?
>>
File: IMG_4203.jpg (3.92 MB, 3579x3579)
3.92 MB
3.92 MB JPG
>>4253366
I had used a roll of e100 and was complaining because I could not hand hold at such low speeds.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerBrooktree Studios LLC
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3579
Image Height3579
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID8586245133
>>
>>4253409
>100
>low speed
bruh what
>>
>>4252644

Some anons might find this interesting

The shutter on my Olympus opens when I wind the film (which primes the shutter). I took the lens apart and found a broken spring (not a coiled kind, more like a springy wire). After some experimenting I concluded that the spring pushes against the shutter control point to keep the shutter closed until a cam pushes in the other direction to open the shutter up. Then once the escapement expires another cam will push the shutter closed. So basically I need some jewellery wire or something to replace the broken spring.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 12 Pro
Camera Software16.1.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)51 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:14 14:42:32
Exposure Time1/50 sec
F-Numberf/1.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/1.6
Brightness3.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.20 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Digital Zoom Ratio2.0
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4253409
I'm gonna get her asshole to be right in sunlight and shoot pretty open. That should be enough. Or tripod and 1/30
>>
>>4250655
Anon, have you ever print on Bergger RC1 paper? Is it good enough to dive into it? Or Ilford is just a goat and nothing else matters?

yeah it would be better to try it by myself, but 100 sheets pack is not the best option for testing lol
>>
File: reflx_customs.png (29 KB, 315x206)
29 KB
29 KB PNG
reflxlabs bros, I don't feel so good...
>>4253420
>>4253409
post on /s/ or somewhere and link it
>>
File: AAA036.jpg (1.51 MB, 980x1471)
1.51 MB
1.51 MB JPG
>>4252505
>>4252507
>>4252509
super comfy, good shots anon
>>4252522
I've done this a few times and it works better in some cases. The argument that B/W is all you really "need" for some images is true to an extent. Most people don't approach a color photo as needing to have the exact perfect colors, but it really can detract if there's too much going on/the subject isn't immediately apparent.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Camera ModelF135
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:03:06 05:52:52
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width980
Image Height1471
>>
File: delta3200.jpg (6 KB, 225x225)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
Thoughts on Delta 3200? Im thinking of trying it out but I don't want to waste my money on a film that may not be worthwhile.
>>
>>4253654
depends of your application, in any case its grainy.
>>
>>4253654
It's a 1000 speed film. If you are going to get a lab to develop it without pushing to 3200, shoot it at 1000 or 800 iso. If you shoot it at 3200 you have to tell them to push it to 3200, otherwise they will develop it normally and it will be underexposed. Other than that it's a very nice stock, grainy and let's you see in the dark
>>
>>4253396
try a polarizer filter
>>
>>4253659
are you sure they wouldn't develop it at box speed? Kodak T-Max P3200 is an 800 iso film but the box and dx code are for 3200 ISO so my assumption is they would dev at 3200
>>
>>4253729
this anon is crazy. nevermind.

it could be an issue only if your lab are lazy faggots who develop all rolls together in one big bucket of d76
>>
>>4253733
box speed is not true speed, retard. you tell your lab what you want things developed at, why would they guess and PUSH your film for you? do you think your lab develops your single roll in a 1 reel paterson tank? lmao
theres literally 4 squares on the delta 3200 roll, "1600", "3200", "6400" and blank. i wonder what these are for
>>4253729
thats because they are designed to be pushed. if you shoot it at 3200, you tell your lab that and mark it on the roll. see above
>>
>>4253735
>box speed is not true speed, retard.
wow. you know so much you might be a pro. looks like you are the smartest boy in the internet, tell me a bit more about labs, sempai
>>
>>4253740
>tell me a bit more about labs
i told you about film, not labs
youre the one that said they labs develop any delta 3200 at 3200, and youre saying im telling you about labs?
you cant even make a straight argument
>>
File: canon7.jpg (24 KB, 635x232)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
Got a canon 7 on the way and need a lens and was thinking about just getting a cheap jupiter 12 to start out with although i heard some scratch the light baffles and dont really fit but some are fine, any particular things i should look out for like the date of production?

Also the light meter is busted in this canon but hopefully its just dirty contacts, either way i don't mind using sunny 16 or a light meter app.
>>
>>4253733
>calls others lazy
>takes b&w to a lab (lol)
>>4253745
>ASIS
y
i
k
e
s
>>
File: coolin.jpg (90 KB, 736x671)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>4253772
>ASIS
doesn't bother me, still going to open it up and give it a cla tho
>>
>>4253745
maybe an industar 61? They are cheap and never read about them having that kind of issue.
>>
>>4253803
I believe stolen biogon is always better than stolen tessar.
>>
>>4253819
>tfw no stolen planar
>>
I finally did it lads, I finally bought an LF camera. Is there a lens anyone would recommend? I'm talking about something you'd die on the hill defending. Otherwise I might go for a Schneider 150mm f/5.6 105° XL
>>
>>4253803
55mm would be a tiny bit too tight for my liking, Currently looking at the jupiter-8 which is 50mm, so I might do a little research and see if there are any issues with mounting
>>
>>4253745
>jupiter 12
either that or a russian 28mm, it's cheap and easy.
Canon rangefinders are fun to use, i have a VT and it's golden
>>
>>4253803
nta but I was looking at getting an industar 69 until I read somewhere that they're not actually standard M39 mount and won't focus to infinity when installed on a standard camera. I dunno if that's true for all industars but if so they're only really good for using with mirrorless adapters.
>>
>>4253945
industar 69 were made for the Chaika cameras and just like the Chaika they have non standard threads, shouldn't be a problem with any other industar.
>>
Ektar scans I just got back

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-3000
Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:16 17:58:55
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3625
Image Height2433
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4254133

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-3000
Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:16 17:58:55
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3625
Image Height2433
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4254134

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-3000
Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:16 17:58:55
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3625
Image Height2433
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4254133
Funny.
>>4254134
Could have been cool, but not really original and the composition is disastrous. I usually don't care but you have the lines right there man.
>>
>>4254133
nice
>>
File: scanner.jpg (178 KB, 1080x1886)
178 KB
178 KB JPG
Retarded question but these TMA Scanners, are they standalone or do they require a flatbed?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.G780GXXS7EWI3
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1080
Image Height2400
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2023:11:16 12:07:48
Light SourceUnknown
>>
the thread is dying lads, quick, 3 questions for you all :
What is the camera that you always have with you ?
Do you prefer using something mechanical or electronic ?
What is you favourite fast film stock ?
>>
>>4254283
Nikon FM;
Mechanical, i like when things go klick-klack;
Probably Double-X pushed to 800.

I wish Exaktaanon was back :c
>>
>>4250655
Is there any places where I can see lot's of film pictures with presets?
>>
>>4254283
Nikon FE2
I prefer a calibrated in camera light meter so at least that electronic.
Portra 800 or pushed HP5
>>
>>4250876
i really like fomapan100 and haven't shot the 400 for a long time now.
but i guess bc i like typical 100 iso and don't really mind if i get slow shutterspeeds.
fomapan 100 is definetely recommended, just agigate slow bc it tends to be high contrasty
>>
>>4254283
typically the Olympus 35RC but lately it's been the Olympus Pen EE-3
they both have their pros and cons, I don't have a strong preference for either
pushed HP5
>>
>>4254283
Nikon F3
I like having the finesse of electronic, with the reliability of mechanical.
Superia is the best
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aight, I got a question for you,
I am traveling for a week for a vaction. I have 3 rolls of Tri-X I can bring, but do I also bring som porta
>>
>>4254283
Nikon F2AS.
Mostly mechanical, but a TTL lightmeter is great to have.
Tri-X pushed to hell and back.
>>
>>4252522
I view everything as color & b&w, because a surprising amount of the time, an image will really do something great in one or the other, regardless of how i shot it. similarly, old photographs & films whose colours didnt age well I’ll knock into monochrome, like a lot of 70s movies. Shitty color preservation made the color my olde scan of Bullit distract from the test of the movie. Watch Bullit in B&W, it is fucking INTENSE, bc within the context of that movie, like a predator all you see is geometry and action. Stunning.
>>
>>4254283
Ricoh XR-1 or FED 2
Mechanical with a ttl light meter. I hate sunny 16 or handheld. I tried Canon Rebel G. Not as fun.
HP5+ pushed to 1600/3200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
I have the contax ax with the 50 & 135mm cz lenses.
I barely use it but i really love it when i do use it.
What m42 lens should i adapt on this AF beast ?
Is there any good 35mm m42 out there ?
Maybe a fisheye ? Anything interesting just for the fun and experimenting
>>
>>4254283
1:whichever camera has film in it
2:electronic because the shutter speeds will stay the same no matter if its new or 40 years old
3:prolly proimage 100 pushed to 800, i havent used many fast stocks and only use delta 3200 out of necessity rather than desire
>>
>>4254283
Nikon FA, 14mm aspherical prime.
Yes I am a madman.
>>
>>4254283
Leica m2, mechanical, double x at 800 or Delta 3200
>>4254301
>Double-X pushed to 800
Based
>>
>>4254283
Ricoh FF-3
Electronic for reliability
500T Kodak Vision
>>
>>4254283
>F4S
>Electrinic cuz lazy
>provia 100f cause slide film is goated
>>
File: noice.jpg (394 KB, 1536x2048)
394 KB
394 KB JPG
it arrived and it works, happy to finally have a rangefinder to shoot
>>
>>4254400
???????????????
???????????????
>??????????????
>??????????????
>>
>>4254400
Russian m39/m42 lenses because giving stuff like that autofocus would be hilarious
>>
>>4254283
T90 - favourite camera of all time
Electronic - I find T90 metering really suites slide film.
Provia 100F
>>
>>4254283
Chaika because its smol cute and let me snapshit at my heart content.
I do prefer mechanical but my Praktica BX20 is so fucking comfy
I dunno, maybe 500t vision? I almost never shot anything faster than 200
>>
>>4252590
280 actually, but yeah
>>
Do we have any leaks on that harman teaser?
>>
>>4254573
just wild speculation as far as I know
I will be pretty disappointed if it isn't a new color film
>>
File: DSC05521editSMBDR-1.jpg (318 KB, 1600x1600)
318 KB
318 KB JPG
gunna load up some xx canisters tonight. it's wintertime friends
>>
>>4254456
Noice I was thinking of getting a Canon rangefinder but I already have an argus and FED 2.
>>
>>4254675
Based and xx pilled
>>
>>4254675
just did 18 rolls like 5 nights ago. i cannot stop shooting this thing at 800. i want to have sex with it, i love it
>>
>>4252732
Still /r/'ing frame #27 good saar
>>
File: orwo.jpg (175 KB, 2000x1333)
175 KB
175 KB JPG
Anybody want to hazard a guess what happened here?
Is my blix wore out? Usually when my chems go bad I just get blank film.
Does NC500 just look like that? weird green base and super dark?
X-ray raped a gorillion times at customs?
I'll try scanning it once it dries but I don't have high hopes.
>>
>>4254937
>X-ray raped a gorillion times at customs?
Afaik that doesn't happen anymore. They use more refined Xrays that emit less rads and less energy overall.
>>
File: honkers_small.jpg (2.24 MB, 1500x1016)
2.24 MB
2.24 MB JPG
Well it's not the chems, I just ran a scrap of exposed/unexposed piece of leader through and it came out dark/clear. Also demonstrates the little bit of light coming in through the crack around the bathroom door isn't bright enough to fog (or at least not for the 200iso test leader, but I don't think 1 stop would make that much difference.
I can almost get usable images out maybe by converting to b&w

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.32
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution843 dpi
Vertical Resolution843 dpi
Image Created2023:11:18 13:14:49
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: fog_small.jpg (2.12 MB, 1500x1028)
2.12 MB
2.12 MB JPG
I've resolved to accept this dogshit film as it is and do my best to pretend I intended for these pics to look like this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.32
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution837 dpi
Vertical Resolution837 dpi
Image Created2023:11:18 15:01:54
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: leaves_small.jpg (2.16 MB, 1500x1021)
2.16 MB
2.16 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8200i
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.32
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution839 dpi
Vertical Resolution839 dpi
Image Created2023:11:18 14:46:10
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 76980032.jpg (2.8 MB, 3089x2048)
2.8 MB
2.8 MB JPG
Went up Dragon's Tooth with the gf a few weeks ago, finally got the shite developed. Just posting a couple of them

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelQSS-32_33
Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 8.01.001 2008.01.15
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3089
Image Height2048
>>
File: 76990028.jpg (3.31 MB, 3089x2048)
3.31 MB
3.31 MB JPG
>>4254970

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelQSS-32_33
Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 8.01.001 2008.01.15
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3089
Image Height2048
>>
>>4254970
>>4254975
Sorry you have to use lab scans bro.
>>4254937
That film is rooted, or you failed catastrophically in the dev. It looks like the whole roll was heated, ie you left your camera sitting on the beach or in a car in the sun, we saw this all the time at the lab I worked at. So many thot's bikini photos wasted :'(
>>
>>4254937
Green base???? What the fuck thats something ive only seen on really expired film
>>
>>4254937
green base is kind a typical for a bleach bypass process or for a very expired (or badly stored) film.

So I would recommend to check your chemistry.

Another funny option: the entire roll is FOGGED AS FUCK. Is it possible that you flashed it somehow when rolled on the reel, or maybe your dev tank wasn't closed properly?
>>
File: vision3.jpg (172 KB, 2000x1333)
172 KB
172 KB JPG
Some vision3 250D in the same exact chemicals, bought at the same time and arrived in the same package. Chemicals are fine, well, actually on their last legs but good enough for my snapshits and not bad enough to fuck up a whole roll.
>>4254998
>rooted
Is this some new zoomer speak or something specific? I guess I could have got the chemicals too hot, but I haven't had that problem before. Or else it was treated badly before I got it.
>>4255081
I dunno, if it was me fogging it I would kind of expect it to be uneven but it's very consistently black/green.

In conclusion, it seems that after all these years krauts STILL can't compete with superior burger technology.
>>
File: 76990009.jpg (2.79 MB, 3089x2048)
2.79 MB
2.79 MB JPG
>>4254998
One day I'll buy a really nice scanner for myself but for now the lab (usually) doesn't do me too dirty.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelQSS-32_33
Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 8.01.001 2008.01.15
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3089
Image Height2048
>>
File: Velvia50 002.jpg (1009 KB, 1200x800)
1009 KB
1009 KB JPG
>>4254739
>>4254757
hell ya i shoot it mostly at 800 too.

>>4254843
my bad!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeBessa R2
Camera ModelVelvia 50 @ 40
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2020:09:15 15:19:07
Exposure Time0.8 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness-4.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: turkeys_small.jpg (522 KB, 1500x1500)
522 KB
522 KB JPG
the sprocket holes are gimicky but I like it
>>
>>4252546
Holy FUCK that's cool. Are you using the waterproof Nikon?
>>
>>4252546
That's some good visibility. Great shot.
>>
Nearly all pics on my Foma 100 roll were very contrasty. Dark areas are black while bright areas are almost blown out. Could this be caused by over-development? The film was in Xtol for about 7 mins total. Agitation every beginning minute. I've never shot Foma 100 before

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeReflecta
Camera ModelProScan 7200
Camera SoftwareVueScan 9 x64 (9.8.13)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1200
Image Height785
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Horizontal Resolution1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution1800 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2023:08:20 18:54:05
Image Width1200
Image Height785
>>
>>4254573
update: the hints are pretty strong now it's color film.
>mentioned a "photowalk" implying that the product is something you'd use on a photo-walk => could be film, a camera, or some sort of accessory
>released an image of what looks like a standard 135 film cassette's silhouette
>likely not B&W--Ilford and Kentmere already have basically a complete lineup of B&W film between them, a new B&W film would have just been released under the Ilford or Kentmere brands

It probably IS color film. And if Harman's statements that they are not "collaborating" with any other companies are true, it means they have spun up a new color film coating line, which itself is already a good thing given that the demand for color film is outstripping the supply. Although I heard that the bottlenecks are in confectioning and not actually coating the film.

I would hope they can undercut the market price on color film. That would be really nice. or even offering C41 bulk film to hobbyists. You can bulk roll color now, but it''ll be ECN-2 film with remjet. So unless you develop color at home and deal with the remjet yourself you'd lose out on developing costs, whereas bulk C-41 is good to go.
>>
>>4252546
Can you get an underwater flash gun? It'll bring out the colors much better.
>>
File: 1686496842307372-1.jpg (201 KB, 1600x1600)
201 KB
201 KB JPG
>>4255237
>>4255256
>>4255275
Hey thanks. Yea, I'm using a Nikonos V. You can get strobes for it but they wouldn't have helped with that shot either way. Best used for macro stuff. I wouldn't want to be diving with they much extra equipment though.
>>
>>4255343
why wouldn't the strobes help? Too far?
>>
>>4250688
>>4250689
>>4250691
>>4250692
Ooooo very nice anon
>>
File: DSC05122editSMBDR-1.jpg (1.53 MB, 1600x1600)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB JPG
>>4255348
Ya way too far. Water eats up strobe light real fast.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
File: AAA026.jpg (1.2 MB, 1471x980)
1.2 MB
1.2 MB JPG
Superia, my beloved

(1/?)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Camera ModelF135
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:18 02:25:19
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1471
Image Height980
>>
File: AAA026.jpg (2.18 MB, 1470x2205)
2.18 MB
2.18 MB JPG
>>4255457
(2/?)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Camera ModelF135_PLUS
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:16 16:47:25
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1470
Image Height2205
>>
File: AAA021.jpg (1.46 MB, 2205x1470)
1.46 MB
1.46 MB JPG
>>4255459
(3/?)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Camera ModelF135_PLUS
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:16 16:47:20
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2205
Image Height1470
>>
File: AAA006.jpg (1.25 MB, 980x1471)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB JPG
>>4255460
(4/?)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Camera ModelF135
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:18 02:24:58
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width980
Image Height1471
>>
File: AAA033.jpg (1.24 MB, 980x1471)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
>>4255461
(5/?)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Camera ModelF135
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:18 02:25:27
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width980
Image Height1471
>>
File: 20231119_224015.jpg (196 KB, 960x720)
196 KB
196 KB JPG
>>4255462
(6/?)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelF135
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Image Created2023:11:19 22:40:15
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Height1471
Image Width980
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: AAA013.jpg (1.35 MB, 980x1471)
1.35 MB
1.35 MB JPG
>>4255466
(7/7)
Constructive rate/roast/whatever appreciated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePakon, Inc
Camera ModelF135
Camera SoftwareTLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2023:11:18 02:25:05
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width980
Image Height1471
>>
>>4250665
Australian spotted lmao
>>
File: flowerscompressed.jpg (4.18 MB, 5332x5260)
4.18 MB
4.18 MB JPG
Recently started using a TLR and returning the medium format and colour specifically. Can't believe the range that colour negative film has on medium format. I find its use quite limited and the TLR shooting experience quite restrictive so I will continue to work with 35mm and HP5+ and Tri-X predominantly
>>
>>4255553
Compressing from 51mb to 4.2mb
>>
>>4255554
Fix your black point and your greens
>>
What does /fgt/ think about this? Is this the new reneissance of film? Is it the last throws of a dying fad? Is it a petty cash grab?
If there were new film cameras available with modern innards would you buy one?

Link: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/461800-6-films-just-hit-shelves-pentax-japan-official-store.html?src=newsletterANovember202023
>>
>>4255594
Pic didn't post

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width640
Image Height1874
>>
>>4250655
>Patterson tank finally arrives alongside reel.
>Reel doesn't fit.
FUCK MY LIFE
What's more important? Do I develop with the tank with the film just thrown around or do I do it with a cooking pot and the reel? I feel so retarded right now. Fucking ebay.
Also, why the fuck does a metallic tank and reel cost over 40 bucks?
>>
>>4255614
>reel doesn't fit
how the fuck? do you have a photo?
>>
>>4255616
Okay, it's not a patterson tank. It's just a metallic film developing tank. I thought all of em were pattersons. The difference is probably like 10mm in diameter
>>
>>4255619
Sorry to say but you're a dumbass for assuming that. You didn't notice what a Paterson tank looked like while ordering Paterson reels?
>>
>>4255622
Yeah I did but I thought the patterson part of the patent was the cap that was lightproof.
Anyhow, I'll guess I'll do the whole procedure in the dark and with a pot, since that seems to be more important than doing it on the tank
>>
File: poorfag_devtank.jpg (54 KB, 800x600)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>4255619
yeah the metal tanks are supposed to use metal reels (which I think are not compatible with patterson due to the column in the middle). I've been thinking about getting one of the metal ones to try since I always have a hard time getting 36 shot rolls to thread on all the way to the plastic reels.
If you're too poor to complete a set, you could probably make a tank out of bean cans or something. Just jamming the film in will probably leave patterns on it where the film was touching and didn't get enough developer. But maybe if you shake it good you can counter that.
>>
File: DSC05475editSMBDR-1.jpg (1.19 MB, 1600x1600)
1.19 MB
1.19 MB JPG
>>4255624
The film will 100% stick together. Don't do that.

>>4255627
If you can't get a 36exp roll on a reel easily, your reels are gummed up. There's enough space for ~42exp with Patterson reels.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4255632
They won't stick together, since I'll be doing it on a pot (in complete darkness) and with the reel.
>>
File: DSC_1294.jpg (497 KB, 1488x992)
497 KB
497 KB JPG
cows hiding in trees

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareVer.1.00
PhotographerSOP610
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:20 18:17:50
Exposure Time1/6 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length0.00 mm
Image Width1488
Image Height992
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Altitude0.00 m
Time (UTC)00:00:00
GPS StatusUnknown
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeMANUAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range0.0 mm; f/0.0
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations193853
>>
File: DSC_1276.jpg (345 KB, 992x1488)
345 KB
345 KB JPG
>>4255705
big grey dog

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareVer.1.00
PhotographerSOP610
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:20 18:11:35
Exposure Time1/6 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length0.00 mm
Image Width992
Image Height1488
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Altitude0.00 m
Time (UTC)00:00:00
GPS StatusUnknown
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeMANUAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range0.0 mm; f/0.0
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations193817
>>
File: DSC_1284.jpg (410 KB, 1488x992)
410 KB
410 KB JPG
>>4255706
cats

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareVer.1.00
PhotographerSOP610
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:20 18:14:29
Exposure Time1/6 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length0.00 mm
Image Width1488
Image Height992
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Altitude0.00 m
Time (UTC)00:00:00
GPS StatusUnknown
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeMANUAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range0.0 mm; f/0.0
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations193833
>>
>>4255705
>>4255706
>>4255708
lol
love that dawg, nice pic bro
>>
File: IMG_4240.jpg (1.16 MB, 1461x1490)
1.16 MB
1.16 MB JPG
>is this a light leak?

The obvious answer seems to be yes, however it only happened on 2 pics in this roll and has never happened before on the ~40 rolls I’ve taken on this film back.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
CommentScreenshot
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1488
Image Height2266
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_4241.jpg (3.16 MB, 1467x1499)
3.16 MB
3.16 MB JPG
>>4255795
This is the next picture in the roll.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution144 dpi
Vertical Resolution144 dpi
Image Width1467
Image Height1499
>>
>>4255795
what film stock was it? lomography 120 is infamous for not spooling (after shooting the roll) properly i.e "fat rolls" and can introduce light leaks. happened to me on a shoot because im a dumbass. the last few frames wont be wound on tightly and will be close to the edge of the circles on each end of the spool.
>>
File: IMG_4243.jpg (2.98 MB, 1462x1496)
2.98 MB
2.98 MB JPG
>>4255800
It was Kodak gold 200. This was the only other pic with it (ignore being blurry I couldn’t hand hold) and this pic was the pic before the other light leak ome. So 2 random pics in a row had it but no other ones did.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution144 dpi
Vertical Resolution144 dpi
Image Width1462
Image Height1496
>>
File: A7R09585EOS10ET160redo.jpg (1.59 MB, 1366x2048)
1.59 MB
1.59 MB JPG
>>4255795
>>4255803
Yes these are light leaks. Either loose roll like the other guy said, or you back, darkslide, etc letting some in.
>>4255142
rooted is australian for fucked. I think the roll got hot, like I said. Whether you did it, or it occurred in shipping, who can say.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM2
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.22
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/125 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness-9.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceDaylight
FlashFlash, Compulsory, Return Not Detected
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1366
Image Height2048
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>4255803
actually im gonna guess its a problem with the back, just given how the leaks look. if you can, shoot another burner roll through it and get it developed to see. make sure its completely light tight before and after shooting to make sure.
>>
>>4255811
I’ve shot and developed at least 5 or so (b&w) rolls since this with no signs of leaks. I don’t have any pics from those on here that don’t have people I know in them.
>>
>>4255814
even more strange then.... do you switch lenses on it? maybe it happened when switching lenses? also what frames did it happen on? was it the last 2 or in the middle? in that case i would just say it was the roll itself and continue on.
>>
>>4255815
No lense change. And shots 7 and 8
>>
>>4252700
damn you really captured a mood here. Makes me feel something
>>
>>4252700
Love the composition, anon. Really helps sell the mood.
>>
File: DSC_1267.jpg (371 KB, 1488x992)
371 KB
371 KB JPG
>>4255738
thank you sir. another one cow for you

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareVer.1.00
PhotographerSOP610
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:20 18:07:56
Exposure Time1/6 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length0.00 mm
Image Width1488
Image Height992
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
Altitude0.00 m
Time (UTC)00:00:00
GPS StatusUnknown
Image QualityRAW
White BalanceAUTO1
Focus ModeMANUAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Lens TypeUnknown
Lens Range0.0 mm; f/0.0
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations193799
>>
File: 2023_0065_011.jpg (1005 KB, 1500x1500)
1005 KB
1005 KB JPG
Retropan 320, stand dev (rodinal 1+100, a bit over 1 hour)
It finally doesn't look like completely underdeveloped ass compared to standard developing, but it's still pale and thin as fuck. I guess that's just how it is?
Got some very nice tonality and shadow detail out of it (after a moderate curve lift), but holy fuck the grain
>>
File: 2023_0065_008.jpg (725 KB, 1500x1500)
725 KB
725 KB JPG
>>4255887
I promised myself this would be my last roll of it unless the results were spectacular, but somehow I feel strangely addicted to its shittiness and on the verge of ordering more.
I could probably get slightly better results if I scanned on the Plustek but I didn't have time so I just tossed it on V600 and tweaked in IrfanView kek. So you could call it a preview I guess. (Made this frame too dull, but don't feel like redoing)
Shot this roll at 250, not that it matters much.
>>
>>4255887
over-sharpening
>>
File: 2023_0064_006.jpg (615 KB, 1500x1500)
615 KB
615 KB JPG
>>4255892
Also shot (at 50) and developed Ferranis P30 at the same time. Same deal about deciding whether to stop giving it chances and ditch it.
It took the dullest gray weather to get some sensible tonality out of it, but still only in a couple of frames. In most the sky is completely blocked out, making it look kind of like those digital shots pretending to be film. But at least it got shadow detail this time, and that detail is actually pretty nice. Still can't decide, between the ridiculous contrast and being panchromatic in name only I kind of hate it, but it also makes shooting things more adventurous than the always correct and predictable FP5/HP5/Delta.
This was my first stand dev in over a decade, and damn it's comfy to just bugger off for an hour instead of staring at the timer and straining my wrists every minute.
Also both rolls were medium format if this wasn't obvious.
>>4255894
Yeah probably, see my second post, I wasn't very subtle or careful knowing I'll be redoing them properly some time later. But it still is grainy like holy shit.
>>
>>4255894
This
I see this shyt all the time on boomers' photos
>>
>>4255887
I absolutely hate foma however with retropan 320 and creative 400 I have had MUCH better results metering at 160/200 ASA instead of their stated ones.
>>
File: IMG_3892.jpg (860 KB, 1823x1587)
860 KB
860 KB JPG
>>4255942
Here’s retropan metered at 160

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPad mini
Camera Software16.6.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:10:02 21:13:10
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness3.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length3.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1823
Image Height1587
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_20231120_143309648~2.jpg (231 KB, 1267x1900)
231 KB
231 KB JPG
>>4255943
>>4255942
Yeah it's basically a rule of thumb up divide box sensitivity of go foma by two. I did try Retropan at 200 before but with poor results in regular dev. I guess I have no choice but to try it at 160 in stand now. But for the first attempt at stand I wanted to keep closer to box speed, just in case it miraculously worked.
Maybe one day I'll bite the bullet and buy the Retro developer, but I worry it will but give much better results and I'll be committed to 10 rolls of it or whatever the capacity is. On the other hand, I LOVE their R100 stock and process a lot, so maybe?
Pic related, P30 and Retropan drying side by side.
>>
>>4255614
So I'm this retard. I successfully developed my first roll of film last night, now I'll see about scanning them. Had to do the whole process in the dark with a pot, the reels and the chemicals. All had to be measured very precisely.
ANYWAYS, I need your help guys. I know I have a metallic tank with the lightproof cap, so I need to know if a steel reel will actually fit properly inside those, I don't wanna waste another week waiting for a reel that won't even fit.
>>
>>4255990
>I know I have a metallic tank with the lightproof cap, so I need to know if a steel reel will actually fit properly inside those, I don't wanna waste another week waiting for a reel that won't even fit.
Which brand? Who made your tank?
>>
File: s-l1600.jpg (132 KB, 1600x1200)
132 KB
132 KB JPG
>>4255993
It's nameless. Doesn't have a brand anywhere, and the dude who listed it on ebay didn't mention the brand. Pic rel is my tank.
>>
>>4255996
looks like standard one. nikor reel should fit well I guess.
>>
>>4256000
Thanks & Checked.
>>
>>4255811
the light leaks would be tinted with the film mask color if it came through the back, wouldn't they?
>>
File: IMG_4245.jpg (4.62 MB, 5401x3620)
4.62 MB
4.62 MB JPG
>are point and shoot cameras the ultimate film experience

I just shot my first roll and and I was able to get “everyday life” captured so much easier, exposure easier amd im general everything was easier, quicker and more accurate.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerBrooktree Studios LLC
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5401
Image Height3620
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID8651813782
>>
File: __3_0644.jpg (1.34 MB, 2996x2000)
1.34 MB
1.34 MB JPG
Test rolls came back.

This would be Ektar 100 with a warming filter on a Retina Reflex III

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeAgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Modeld-lab.2/3
Camera SoftwareRB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
PhotographerOnly the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution400 dpi
Vertical Resolution400 dpi
Image Created2023:11:09 17:57:38
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2996
Image Height2000
>>
File: ---_0581.jpg (2.31 MB, 2996x2000)
2.31 MB
2.31 MB JPG
Some pretty strong shutter capping on my Leica IIIc, looks like it's time for a shutter replacement. My NKVD-FED also exhibited the same behavior so I will send the both

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeAgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Modeld-lab.2/3
Camera SoftwareRB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
PhotographerOnly the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution400 dpi
Vertical Resolution400 dpi
Image Created2023:11:10 12:49:11
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2996
Image Height2000
>>
File: _2A_0680.jpg (1.49 MB, 2996x2000)
1.49 MB
1.49 MB JPG
Reflex III again here

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeAgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Modeld-lab.2/3
Camera SoftwareRB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
PhotographerOnly the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution400 dpi
Vertical Resolution400 dpi
Image Created2023:11:09 18:04:16
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2996
Image Height2000
>>
>>4256159
>Ektar 100

shit is ektar really worth the price? these pics are TEMPTING me.
>>
>>4256162
>NKVD-FED
I always wondered who falls for this ebay scam. Now I have the answer.
>>
>>4256285
Bruh if you want lifted green shadows and orange highlights just edit whatever you shoot in post. This is *not* what ektar looks like, even with a warming filter.
>>
>>4256288

Was a local buy, both of them actually. Cheap too. I paid 100 for the Leica and I think 180 for the NKVD-FED
>>
>>4252700
why can i hear a saxophone playing with your image when i enlarge it anon?
>>
what cheap compact cameras that are decent for quick snaps do you recommend? my slr is too big to carry and i want something small and decent-ish. i got compact digishits but i want to use up my hoarded film more. located in eastern yurop. thanks
>>
File: file.png (690 KB, 640x853)
690 KB
690 KB PNG
looks like someone leaked the Harman color film
>>
File: i3abb8953y1c1.jpg (3.33 MB, 3024x4032)
3.33 MB
3.33 MB JPG
>>4256502

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
File: IMG_1235.jpg (754 KB, 1170x1451)
754 KB
754 KB JPG
>>4256503

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
>>4256503
>green base
its fucking svemacolor lmao
>>
>>4256502
:((((((
disappointing
>>
>>4256520
>new color film
>disappointing
what the hell did you wanted
>>
>>4256521
E6, new tabular grain bw, whatever
>>
>>4256522
they already mentioned that was a color film you dumdum
>E6
NEVER EVER
>>
>>4253437
theyre gonna rape it with x rays XD
>>
>>4256522
they keep fucking baiting me with 400 E6 film i cant take it anymore somebody kidnap fuji execs to bring back provia 400x
>>
>>4256502
Not that I follow the photo news closely, but in my 20+ years of shooting I never thought I'd live to see a new film product being teased and leaked, like some kind of consumable pop culture slop. I'm cautiously excited.
Also $11 burgers ain't bad if the film turns out to be good (unlike, sadly, the recent Orwo shit).
What's the leak source? There seems to have been a reddit post but it (and the author) since got jannied, God that place is cucked beyond belief.
>>
Any advice gor shooting 35 in a 120?
Gonna blast a roll of my favorite film, foma through one for thanksgiving
>>
>>4256285
It's not any more expensive than other decent films these days. Cheaper than portra.
I miss fuji so much bros
>>
>>4256504
>200 iso
Better have interesting colour.
>limited edition
Fucking DROPPED
Probably some recut stock they just found just like everything else """"new"""" nowadays.
>>
>>4256565
They say that everything from emulsion to packaging in house.
I hope limited edition means that they will discontinue it as soon as improved version arrives.
Welp, I guess they found (or hunted) people that left Invisocoat after its recent insolvency >_>
>>
>>4256574
the limited edition toedipping bullshit just smells like they dont believe in their product
idk about you or anyone else but im not gonna pay to be their beta tester
>>
>>4256579
>they dont believe in their product
of course, their product is almost certainly garbage. making color film is hard, otherwise more companies would do it.
>>
>>4256431
>eastern yorup
CHAIKA YES, or a Smena I guess
>>4256544
if you camera has a red window cover that thing with electrical tape
>>
>>4256579
Color Mission LMAO
I'll keep faith in Ilford until I get to shoot it though
>>
>>4250880
Either a lower angle or a more shallow depth of field would have helped the car stand out more. It's a little too busy otherwise.

>>4252505
It's giving Wes Anderson Vibes, very well done

>>4252546
A great example of environment/context with this one. Makes the divers look small and the sea feels huge.

>>4253396
The over-exposure on this one actually works well, feels like she is being enveloped by the "light a the end of the tunnel". With regard to metering, E100 only has about 5 stops of effective dynamic range, so it really pays to use Ansel Adam's zone system here in order to get a good sense of what the negative will turn out like. If you are gonna keep shooting landscapes, especially with positive film, get a spot meter; it makes a world of difference. Here is a good video on how to use one for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh3mkWMRpew&t=1137s
In a pinch, just try metering the sky, then the ground and if they are 3 stops or less apart, shoot the halfway point between them and you should be fine. Worse comes to worse, try bracketing.

>>4254133
These are phenomenal colors and I love that the kids are out of focus. 10/10

>>4254675
Not to be a normie but this would look great as a long exposure. I am a sucker for that shit.

>>4254970
all the little differences in color in the trees make this look like an impressionist painting, could use a boost of saturation though, or at least some dehaze.

>>4255379
Love it, perfect gradient and light falloff, hella ethereal.

>>4255870
Cool shot, but you should just lean into it, crank that fucking contrast (or drag the left side of the levels curve right) and make it a full silhouette
>>
File: Capture.png (61 KB, 1125x148)
61 KB
61 KB PNG
>>4256653
>Cool shot, but you should just lean into it, crank that fucking contrast (or drag the left side of the levels curve right) and make it a full silhouette
Just needed to pull middle tones in the levels and add gradient +2 exposure for the grass. I don't have an access to photoshop rn so made as much as I could in that moment.
Scene in general appeared a bit tricky to work with. Pushed Kodak XX has too much contrast for this kind of shots (50% sky 50% ground)
>>
File: IMG_2717.jpg (3.67 MB, 4032x3024)
3.67 MB
3.67 MB JPG
>>4256653
>>4256669
Also tried in printing of this shot yesterday. Unfortunately I ran out of multigrade paper so I struggled printing it on monograde normal contrast sheet. Nothing that cannot be fixed in the darkroom, so I'll reprint it soon to make it looks better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 12 mini
Camera Software17.1.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:23 07:56:25
Exposure Time1/50 sec
F-Numberf/1.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/1.6
Brightness2.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.20 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
Hi everyone,

Since some troll is shitting up the thread I made asking for advice I decided to ask for advice here instead.

I do amateur analog photography for fun and now I’m building a blog website for my kid’s school and I’d like to add a “meet the team” page with portraits of the teachers and assistants. I’ve got a Minolta X-300 with a Minolta auto 132X flash and a good tripod. I also have various lenses but I prefer using my 28mm rokkor.

Would this be sufficient to do decent portraits? Since it’s winter here and most of the time overcast and cold I think shooting indoors would be best. Since we won't have many options it would probably be some community center with tungsten lighting. Would I need an additional lighting setup?

Any tips welcome!

>picrel is something I took on my late 60s SRT-101 (scanned but not developed myself tho)
>>
>>4256767
bullying is the answer. this faggot learned he didn't need his own thread!
>>
>>4256769
this board is cancer
>confirmed
>>
>>4256767
> Minolta auto 132X flash
>indoors portraits
>28mm
No No No. Forget, you're not ready for this conversation and I'm too lazy to explain it to you, but result will be shit. Believe me.
>>
>>4256767
>get at least an independent lightbox
>use a tighter lens, 50mm is a MINIMUM
28 is too large and unflatering, only use it when you want to shoot everyone indoor.
>>
on the subject of flash, what happens when you use a flash with a lens wider than the flash's coverage?
>>
>>4256830
lot of vignetting, with the possibility of having the center overexposed with a TTL flash
>>
>>4256502
I knew it was gonna be color film. This is great. Although I have to say the ugly ass box design is pretty underwhelming, I hope they make something that looks nicer
>>
>>4256506
Nah, it's a very different shade of green, DS-2 had 1930s Agfacolor's antihalation dye that had a clean-dark-green color
>>
That said, if there was a film that can (and is designed to) be processed at 20C, iso 100, good, clean colors with normal saturation and all that jazz, would you use it? Let's say it is priced below Color Mission, but not like 1$/36 frames
>>
File: 000002.jpg (3.41 MB, 3200x2276)
3.41 MB
3.41 MB JPG
I'm happy and angry.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3200
Image Height2276
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2023:11:23 08:29:05
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3200
Image Height2276
>>
New thread >>4256936
>New thread >>4256936
New thread >>4256936
>>
>>4255942
Is it even possible to ruin foma400 by giving it too much light? I tried overexposing a dimly lit scene by something like 6-7 stops and the negative was nearly black but still had all the detail
>>
>>4256914
Don't worry just crop to 6:6 and you're fine



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.