post em
>>4182061
>>4182062
>>4182061One tine s i saw a canere in a mpvie and it was really cooll i liled it so wi tolld all my fredns o line about it i likes it buecause i like thecanrea so it thought it was really cool that time that i wsaw camer a in a mobie
>>4182064
>>4182067
>>4182061Bentax
>>4182069
>>4182072
>>4182073
>>4182074
>>4182075literally me
>>4182075
>>4182078[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:05:24 15:01:45Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1080Image Height787
>>4182079
>>4182081
>>4182083
>>4182084
>>4182087
Every movie dslr makes film advance sounds.
>>4182099true. dslrs sound a bit like dropping a few notebooks on a desk. so the audio guys do away with it. they did it for so long, it's part of their work code by now. front end isn't that different from film so the viewer won't point it out.
>>4182104Kek, no... everything is foley, and for years the standard sound was a 35mm film SLR. People were used to the sound and associated it with professionalism so studios kept using it. Most people think a bald eagle sounds like a Red-tailed hawk for the same reason.
>>4182061>post emIs this fucking emojitroon? gtfo of my board
>>4182104My DSLR sounds like a rat sneezing :(
>>4182105>Most people think a bald eagle sounds like a Red-tailed hawk for the same reason.Even stranger is people think monkeys sound like kookaburras because the standard jungle ambience soundtrack was recorded in Australia.
>>4182111We goyim are a funny bunch. Someone should cull us.
>>4182090[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
>>4182124
>>4182107>gtfo of my board> my board> my
>>4182072btw this movie sucks
>>4182083ID on setup?
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxSEM4-4KAuXKIIoND6nmVLsADcK6BuIgl
WARXMA
>>4182282love the bad photoshop selection on his hair. classic.
>>4182083i think it's Canon XF 305.https://www.wired.com/2014/11/nightcrawler-gear/
>>4182209i think it's Canon XF 305.https://www.wired.com/2014/11/nightcrawler-gear/
No eter arker?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height542Scene Capture TypeStandard
it's interesting how all the good movies and all Nikon but subpar movies are other off-brand wannabe cameras
>>4182561Arguably the best photographer-related film ever made prominently features an Exakta though.
>>4182561>nikon buys good ads instead of making good cameraAnd now they’re second to sony
>>4182582When has Nikon made a bad camera? It's a bad system for adapting stuff to, but not bad.
>>4182587>It's a bad system for adapting stuff tolol what? its the best system for adapting stuff too, can even adapt Sony FE lenses
>>4182596I mean Nikon F, not Z. My bad. Mirrorless is something I don't even think about most of the time.
>>4182598any dslr adapting is retarded though, no evf, no true metering, oh you like to take 10 photos to zone in your exposure? cool i was like that once, wish i'd just bought the lens i wanted instead of some cheap manual lens to adapt lol you'll learn i guess we're all young once and need to learn our own mistakes
>>4182599Adapting on Canon has working metering even if you don't have a dandelion chip. And if you do, you even get EXIF and focus confirmation.
>>4182607So basically you’re fucked without a dandelion chip that might detach from your adapter and shear the contact pins right off your camera. Got it.
>>4182614>no exif data>your fuckedlol
>>4182124i loved robin williams in this role. put it in the same collection with joker.
>>4182129>>4182561>>4182582
hard days night
>>4182620>no focus confirmation on focusing screen that won’t preview DOF on lenses faster than f2.5. Sounds like a valid argument to me
>>4182668I nail focus with a f/1.4 with no issues. Never had a chip detach from the adapter except one time I dropped the adapter alone on the floor.The real issue is using the chipped adapters on the film bodies, they lock up at least with the chip variants I've tested so I have to use kapton tape if I want to use them on the film bodies or just swap adapters.
>>4182740where's this from?
>>4182631
>>4183130> smoke 1995> Canon AE-1good movie actually
>>4183223
>>4183223>a harvey keitel movie i haven't heard ofWell that just happened.
>>4182599>dslr adapting is retarded thoughSo youre agreeing that nikon has no downsides.
>>4182061Bought a 500C after this and ironically it got stolen in Lombok on a trip like that.
>>4183239>So youre agreeing that nikon has no downsides.yes Nikon is and always was kangz and sheit bro
