what lense should i buy for this camera ladsi just don't know pls help
>>418128224-70 f440mm f285mm f1.820mm f1.8enjoy life
i don't know, but it would need a lens and not whatever you wrote
>>4181282400mm f2.8 Z mount
>>4181282you should get a Shoten dumb adapter and whole suite of AIS manual lenses, fuck Z mount garbage
>>4181681This guy gets it. RF and Z mount lenses are disgustingly flat and soulless and if absolutely must have the sharpest glass just buy Sigma because at least its cheap.
>>4181687yannick khong started using modern lenses and now says "well actually maybe the glass or the coatings or something preserves microcontrast tonality transmissions" lolIt makes no difference. "rendering" in the consumer imaging sphere is a skill issue. You're not getting anything super special without paying out the ass for say, cooke cine lenses.
24-120 f4, then you can decide what primes you want by what focal length you shoot the most.
>>4181688He still doesn't back down that a Nikkor 50mm f1.8 is extremely close to a Batis 50mm f1.8
>>4181737clinical sharpness is flat and boring, when will you understand there's more to photography than this shit? (i.e. subject and composition, charter and unintended defects)
>>4181741Zeiss Otus leness are dangerously sharp and still have great rendering, it's clear that the Canikon have chosen a shitty style of rendering and are sticking with it.
>>4181741User error. You can’t buy talent.
>>4181741Reads like either buyers remorse from buying soft lenses or buyers remorse from buying a sharp lens but not being able to take a good photo with any lensYou can soften a lens infinitely with filters or post production but you can’t move the sharpening slider past like, 30. I see a sharp lens like giving a sculptor a bigger rock.
>>4181813>Be me>FULL frame chad among half frame and quarter frame sissies>taking pictures of birds from 6ft away using a 400mm f2.8 prime>just long enough to keep the bird feeder out of the frame>21 elements in 17 groups, weighs 3lbs, compact with a pleasant heft>feel like my photos are too sharp to capture the atmosphere>screw on a 120mm glimmerglass 2 filter>my dad shows up with his hasselblad and 800mm f4 lens>asks me what i'm doing and hands me a beer>we take pictures of birds together for a few hours while talking about sports>go home>resize them all to 1920x1080 and post them on fred mirandaFuji BTFO![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.30Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:03:07 20:58:50Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4181282I just bought this camera today actually. I ordered a 50mm f1.8S with it. But Im also going to buy a Voigtlander 35mm f2 Apo-Lanthar.
>>4181812>>4181813reads like cope trying to justify your cumsoooming habbit
>>4182463>STOP HAVING NICER THINGS THAN METhe fucking state of commies. A working white man has one nice thing made by actual human beings instead of $50 chink crap and all of a sudden it's conspicuous consumption. Why? Because the commie can't afford shit after their basket weaving degree and downtown apartment and they're jealous. Lemme guess kid you think driving anything but a used gook car is white privilege.Get a job hippy. If you were too stupid and lazy to go to school for a real degree there's always construction and factory work. If my dad could walk into a steel mill and support a family of five right that day you can buy a stinkin $500 lens instead of some $50 lensbabble 7fartisans made in smal-dong zipperhead trinket. If you can't make at least $25 an hour in the USA you're probably too stupid to pass a piss test and show up for work on time and sober. If you still can't afford rent it's called a trailer park. Live in one. You might talk to some sane people for once.
>>4181285>>4181287>>4181436>>4181681>>4181687>>4181688>>4181694>>4181737>>4181741>>4181746>>4181812>>4181813>>4181821>>4181837>>4182463>>4182469OP here. Fuck off reddit poofters and give me some real answers. Also samefag
>>4182469>I have nicer things therefore I'm betterlol the marketing companies LOOOVE retards like you, please, proceed, i'll buy your nice shiny thing for 20% one day when you've moved on to the next shiny
>>4182486>the man, manWow you are a fuckin hippy
>>4182487and you are an npc>go figure
Just get the 24-200 and 40 f2 and fuck off
>>4182482Voigtlander lenses, Leica lenses, F lenses, avoid Z(ombie) mount like the plague.
>>4182498>Z(ombie)what is this lame ass meme? Z mount is the biggest mirrorless lens mount which allows more like to hit the sensor, i'ts been proven to be superior and very likely future proofed for DMF camera ZMF
>>4182489>braindead hippy already calling people “sheep”To no one’s surprise. Sent from his chinese slave labor machine.
>>4182501It's a good mount for adapting other, better lenses onto.
>>4182503Yeah ok bullshit reddit boy where is the source then ya poofter?
>>4182502fuck the chinese they're practically bugs anyway
>>4182463>>4182469>>4182487>>4182486>>4182489>>4182502>>4182507SAMEFAG FUCK OFF
>>4182509its too early for schizo posting mate
>>4182510>using inspect elementYeah fuck off retard
>>4182506My eyes nigger, I don't need an MTF chart to tell shit lenses from good ones.
>>4182511>implying everyone is as crazy as you are to prove a pointlol I ain't got no time for that shit
>>4182482What do you shoot nigga? Shouldn't you know this already?
>>4182532mostly my cat, road signs, petrol stations at night
>>4182532Ya mams pussy fgt
>>4182513>I trust my eyes broYa fkn dum dog
>>4182542Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 Lensif you want just one lens that's convenient. Nikon NIKKOR Z 85mm f/1.8 SandNikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 SIf you want primes with better image quality that you'll have to switch between
>>4182562Trash reddit gear
>>4182765>My cameras native lenses are trashmaybe you should have bought something else.
>>4182562The prices on this shit are fucking comical. $700 and $500? For nikon's quality as of late?I can get an 85mm f1.8 that is literally just as good from sony for $599 new, $400 usedI can get a 50mm f2.5 or 40mm f2.5 that is just as sharp and well made, and way more compact, from sony for $500, or a slightly worse 50mm f1.8 for $300And if it's just a Z5 you don't even need LE SHAHP lenses. You could use tamron, samyang, sigma, viltrox etc lenses that are significantly cheaper and because it's only 24mp they will perform the same. Oh wait, Nikon sent everyone a C&D letter if they made an autofocus lens with an aperture+focal length combo that nikon already released or had planned. Sony doesn't have that problem. Enjoy buying a $250 paper thin adapter then.
>>4182942>The prices on this shit are fucking comical. $700 and $500? For nikon's quality as of late?Mang im sick of theese broke boys here crying about price. Ion know what yall doing you need to go to reddit for real shit
>>4182956>proud of wasting money >tells other people to go to redditSee you at rentawheel. Gotta get dem layday loans so you can take out more on your visa.
>>4182542CV 65mm f/2 if you love your cat
>>4182942>I can get an 85mm f1.8 that is literally just as good from sony for $599 new, $400 usedSo $100 less wow anon Nikon sure is robbing you>I can get a 50mm f2.5 or 40mm f2.5 that is just as sharp and well made, and way more compact, from sony for $500That's the same price for a slower lens what the fuck are you even upset about? >Muh SonyYou people need to take more photos and stop seething over camera brands. It literally doesn't matter
>>4182960>worrying about pricesYall is a brokeboy fuck off for real. Post body ya bum bandit
>>4183019>i aint broke i got mastercard>car payments only $700 a month and they let me skip one sometimes i got it madeLol americans
>>4182942>I can get a 50mm f2.5 or 40mm f2.5 that is just as sharp and well made, and way more compact, from sony for $500, or a slightly worse 50mm f1.8 for $300>f2.5lmaoSony cucks have battered wife syndrome, you're getting almost 2 stops less for nearly the same price. Sony is a gimmick brand.
>>4183025F1.8 to F2.5 isn’t even a full stop and it’s less than half the weight of niggor’s equally sharp f1.8. Worth it if you aren’t a tasteless bokehwhore and want a small general use lens that fits in the bag next to the portrait prime, UWA, and telezoom. I have literally never seen a good photo taken on a 50mm at f1.8 or wider.
>>4183035Only wedding photographers and cat spammers do that shit desu. Max aperture autism is 100% because of weddings.
>>4183035lol do you even hear yourself right now? You're a drooling schizo. Why are you so angry? Relax
>>4183041A stellar non post from someone who just got btfo.
>>4183035Except it is a full stop, lol. f/2 to f/2.5 isn't a full stop, but f/1.8 to f/2.5 sure as fuck is.
>>4183043You didn't make any points. You just cope about how you don't "need" something. You are mind broken
>>4183045We were both wrong amazing>>4183046I literally do not need it. There are larger lenses that are way better than nikon’s and I’m sure you think you don’t need those. Like the 55mm f1.8, which has beautiful rendering, or the 50mm f1.4 GM, which is probably too much quality for your wallet. I’m not buying either because wider apertures on lenses with so little reach are something i have never used. Back when everyone shot film I would only buy fast wide-normal lenses for the brighter viewfinder but stick to f4-f16.
>>4183056>non drinkerBeing sober on 4chan is a sin.
>>4183055Ok so why are you commenting on a Nikon thread? >or the 50mm f1.4 GM, which is probably too much quality for your walletso are the lenses I suggested for OP too expensive or too cheap which is it? Those lenses are not too expensive and give you a lot of versatility in terms of aperture. Yeah I don't need the top end Zeiss lenses or whatever but anything faster that 1.8 is niche. If you know better than me than suggest better lenses for Z mount
>>4183060Anything wider than 2.8 is niche. ETZ adapter. The nikon 50mm f1.8 has soulless flat rendering
>>4183063Yeah ok bullshit reddit boy where is the source then ya poofter?
>>4183063All Z-mount Nikon lenses have soulless flat rendering. It's shocking and alarming to me that so few people are able to see it.
>>4183065>sourceI know you’re reddit but what am i?
I just received a Z5 and a 50mm f1.8S in the mail today. I have a Canon R6 since previously. Haven’t shot much with it yet but my initial impressions (first time trying a Nikon btw):+ Significantly smaller and slightly lighter feeling than the Canon+ Looks very cool (I prefer the square look vs the rounded Canon)+ Lens much smaller and lighter than I expected + Colors SOOC seems nicer (but too early to tell for sure)- Menu system seems very logical and straight forwardAnd now some negatives:- LCD screen reminds me of my old Canon Rebel DSLR from 2006. It’s very low res and when in live view it shows a tremendous amount of noise and some lag. It feels like using a chink copy of the real thing.- EVF is a bit better, but still noisy. It is also smaller than on the Canon. Overall this gives you the feeling of using a much cheaper camera than the R6 (which it is).- The autofocus is slow and has a hard time locking on in lower light. I have yet to get the eye af to lock onto an eye. Will try again tomorrow during daylight. But so far I can tell it is way behind the Canon in terms of AFI’m excited to shoot a lot with it tomorrow. It definitely feels cheaper than an R6 (and even a 6D) but other than that it is very nice to handle and it looks pretty amazing.
>>4183063Suggest something better
>>4183095Sony/zeiss 55mm f1.8
>>4183097>Twice the price>Not Z mountliterally what is wrong with you
>>4183100You can adapt E-mount to Z-mount.
>>4183121Fucking liar proof?
>>4183121Why would you buy a camera just to adapt lenses. That's stupid
>>4183122It's been out for a while.>>4183126Being able to adapt lenses is good for the consumer. Fuck Big Camera.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:06:20 15:46:27Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height720
>>4183131You are a shill that can't take a G master out of your ass
One lens? 24-120 f/4 S. Done.
>>4183131This is not a good idea at all, unless you are actually full Sony
>>4183063what makes it niche?