Before and after edits thread. Show your photos before and after your edits.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareLayout from InstagramEquipment MakeLayout from InstagramImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1564Image Height1564Image OrientationUnknown
>>4153260Found the insecure person. So fast as well!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareLayout from InstagramEquipment MakeLayout from InstagramImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1564Image Height1564Image OrientationUnknown
>>4153266That's a man too.
i can't explain why but really like the way i caught them here. not sure if i love the final edit yet though>>4153247i think it's overdone. the edit looks like she slapped the foundation on with a trowel, not natural.
>>4153275You suck at assumptions[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid SP1A.210812.016.G973U1UES8IWA1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1440Image Height3040Image OrientationUnknown
>>4153247>>4153266That’s a man isn’t it
>>4153247great job on the hair, background, and lips. i'd personally blast the post-processed face once with a really soft eraser at ~25% opacity, and leave the eyes as-is. the whiteness of the dress flowers also got lost. assuming before = left and after = right>>4153266this is a man. the added warmth is questionable. it distorted the tree color, brought out the masculine bone structure, and blew out the sunlight. also the fire sign removal is rather clumsy (you can see the pixels)pic: auto white balance, subtle curves adjust, unsharp mask. the before side is *after* focus stacking
>>4153271it's well done, it corrects the sense of "horror movie with dead doggos" to "a comfy cloudy day" without dipping into HDR status. i do wish there was a bit more depth of field but i guess you can't just add that in photoshop
>>4153289yeah it was quite overcast so i had to open it up. i actually find it tricky to get nice colours without making it look "deep fried" when correcting for such a heavily overcast light. it's always given me trouble if i'm not bringing lights or a flash.
>>4153291diffuse sunlight = easy, overcast = hard. there seems to be little middle ground between overly dark/grey, and full-on HDR meme tierbut what do i know, my post-processing (pp) skills suck. currently trying to figure out how to best use astrophotography software to calibrate/reduce noise, and ideally some biology software to automate focus stackingi might just actually redo the whole "pizza microscopy" photo shoot done thus far. i need better raw material, calibration frames, and i forgot to photograph a stage micrometer to make some scale bars. there's a lot of weird math you can do to estimate distances based on your camera sensor n shiet, but i found that simply photographing a known interval of say 100 um is best
>>4153282With what your posting your opinions don't mean all to much
>>4153297oh ya cuz i've literally never taken a non-microscopic photo in my entire life. you're welcome for what i hoped would be constructive criticism, with specific actionable suggestions
>>4153247>>4153266Post trannies some where else.
>>4153247What did you do give her a dust bath? Did she just get done working at her auto repair job? Before was best, other than you lightning the eyes
>>4153266The 2nd half improved and the top half didn'tLol what
>>4153266Where do you live East Palestine? You can't find a normal girl?
I'm breddy good at retouching but limited by my lack of ability to paint. I've seen high end retouchers and they make me jealous.
>>4153266Is she for sale? I have a field that needs ploughing in the spring.
>>4153266i get that everyone should be able to feel good about themselves and the like but like, what's going on with this girl lol, those bruised knees, the crappy socks. and the photographer fucked her extra with that terrible light, not sure if trying to emulate uncle terry and failing horribly at it or just not having a clue but that's super unflattering. just a lot to unpack here.
I just don't get why people post portraits on /p/.
>>4153443This is 4chan. A oerfect place for trannies (if they were one). Your coming off as your actually into them
>>4153305Another shit photo
this is a very old one, it shows pretty well how badly film can be scanned if you don't do it yourselftop is developed and scanned at Asda (the supermarket)middle is re-scanned at homebottom is cleaned upI think it was shot on cheap fujifilm 200
>>4153578well, none of my photos are of colored trannies so it's not worth digging around the file server. you won't listen anyway. will someone with a PhD in the documentary anthropology of shemales in the pacific islands PLEASE inform OP that he's such a retard, he actually *added* red-eye to a photo?
>>4153624Proving your a dumbass 4channer and nothing else
you can have this one for free
>>4153247She looks like a crack whore
>>4153742much better than Op's heavy handed approach. a little goes a long way, op if you make her look like she caked her makeup on with a firehose, maybe you went too far.
>>4153742Yeah, I have 0 clue why OP decided that blasting her eyes to infinity would be a good idea. It just looks so unnatural.
Official Thread Theme:https://youtu.be/_CGHZDmjmuw
>>4153742Nah that looks like a faggit edited my photo. I'll stick to the better edit
>>4153743If you think this broomstick with fake lips and 80 lbs of makeup and fake hair looks anything close to attractive, you are proving your point of view is worthless. She also looks like a trap you restarted butt dweller
>>4153742Bahahahaha yoy didn't even know how to make the eyes the same. Darkened the right one but not the left and you think this is surpior? Ahhhh men. So typical is boring.
Itt inches who can't do portrait photography so they shit on others. Very telling.
>>4153271You have no idea what you are talking about because she wasn't even wearing foundation. I even the skintone so her face matched her whole body and all you retards got triggered
>be OP>make a post-processing thread>post before/after pics of imperfect image editing>receive gentle, specific, and constructive criticism in good faith>praises the good and suggests minor edits to improve the bad>total autistic meltdownback to your hugbox, OP
>>4153247>making her face more brown
>>4154103You mean one person was nice and the rest were ass hats I gave ass hats their ass hats badge. Re read the whole thread and you think they were pleasant to start with? Take your meds..
>>4154604Making the body and the face the same color isn't a bad thing Tonto. It's what women are always trying to achieve with makeup anyway.
>>4153266[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLayout from InstagramCamera Softwaredarktable 4.2.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2023:03:14 20:58:12Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width583Image Height2170
>>4154610The result in OP is pretty fucking bad.
>>4153266>so anyway i started strobe blasting
>>4153247>>4153266Please look up and learn how to use frequency separation to remove the glare from the oily skin and soften up some of the texture bumpiness.you can also use it to help with the fire sign removal. and to clean the window. and the skin glare and harshness of the highlights. The shadow effect is cool in the before, but the clipping of the highlights in the after is off putting. Use localized masking or luminance masks, PLEASE
>>4154671>not getting it right on camera with a Schneider Hollywood Black Magic instead
>>4154676>Shooting digital but wanting to look filmic. Lol poors.
>>4154685how does that "look filmic"?
>>4153247That's a man.
>>4153993^ You couldn't cope any harder than this. Did you type that out while your wife was stuffing down second pack of Twinkies of the day?
>>4154709thats a good one
>>4154971>Every woman is a heckin queen I need to want to fuck them all or i might turn gayTame your dick, son.
>>4153266Lol, lmao even
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerStyletImage-Specific Properties:
>>4153247Look at this dude. lmao
>>4153247you should have left it as it was
>>4153266LMAO in case this is real please learn to use light instead of doing this shit. oh my god
all of you retards: learn how to use light, either the available light or the gear you have with you, instead of "fixing" it later in post. if you get the shot right, it's just going to look better.
>>4155313 contto be clear i think these are fine >>4154709>>4154680>>4153271im talking about these>>4153266>>4153247
>>4153247Left is unironically better. She looks unnatural on the right.
>>4155316she even looks fatter in the edit
>>4155315>>4155313You sound like you know what you’re doing anon, so I’ll ask you, the doggies are mine but as you can see the original shot was dull and gray because of the overcast day. How to counteract this in camera, if you don’t have lights? Is it even possible?
>>4155346when shooting, you would pay attention to how the light is landing on the dog. i would try to get him with light on his face, but ive also sucked like 7 dicks. i don't know what you did to this photo but your edit looks fine to me. the exposure isn't always right if you're in automatic mode but the raw files usually have plenty of flexibility. i would have bumped the exposure slider until the dog looked right, and would not care about blowing out the sky at all. if i want to increase contrast in a color photo i add a very fucking subtle luma curve. a LUMA curve. an rgb curve destroys the color. >you sound like you know what you're doingive sucked 9 dicks
>>4155361>ive sucked 9 dicksIt's not what you know it's who you blow
It's threads like these that remind me why my fat girlfriend refuses to let me ever take her picture in any context.
>>4155375damn. you could potentially make her look really nice though. tell her she can have the images and you won't post them anywhere without her. also, how fat
>>4155410She's 175 at 5'5 and South Asian (higher ratio of fat to lean mass than other pops). She won't let me anyways, I've asked multiple times, making promises along the lines of what you have suggested.
>175 at 5'5 and South Asiani.e. very fat for a woman. We're talking gut spilling out of the pants, saggers touching the floor, neck's gone.
>>4155375Then tell your fellow men to shut their bitch ass up when they get talking like this. They act like this and then wonder why women are insecure
>>4155453>women are insecure because of men and not other womenKek'd hard.
>>4155454Of course you did. Cavemen are easily amused.
>>4155457The only "women" who are insecure over men are trannies, because men don't want them. Real women are only insecure about other women because even the ugliest women can find a man no problem. The only people nobody wants are mentally ill, mutilated freaks.
>>4155460So is that why you are so lonely?
>>4155375Because she knows she is objectively unhealthy and should lose weight.Would you be embarassed if you smoked cigs and shot up heroin?
>>4155469>i know you are but what am iYou have actually sunk to this level. RBTL, queer.
>>4155478Bahahahaha your nips are so hard right now. Triggered wittle princess <3
Could someone please clean up this old pic of me.Trying to improve its quality[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.A715FXXU8DWA2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1079Image Height458
>>4153247"before and after" is a meme without posting the RAW.Your JPEG is already post-processed.
>>4153247Over cooked and it's not doing justice to the milfy Hawaiian Keep the contrast and shadows as they were and bring up the highlights and the whites a smidge more Remember she's a lil oder and you want to soften her features with the light i understand going for fidelity but you're doing a portrait not documenting
top: snoy jepg with skintone focused picture profile i forget to turn offbottom: snoy arw after mild contrast slider abuse[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.30PhotographerJoe MammaMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2023:03:17 23:24:57Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Brightness5.3 EVExposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5168Image Height3448RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessNormal
>>4156162these would be so kino if she didn't have to be tethered away from the chickens[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Camera Softwaredarktable 3.8.1PhotographerJoe MammaMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3000Image Height1875Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2023:03:17 23:09:30Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating500Brightness6.8 EVExposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height2500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessNormal
>>4156162A look with pop this 3d could only come from sigma glass.
>>4156292its a 40mm f2.5and if its sonys own 40mm f2.5 G then thats a lens that preserves more contrast and saturation in shadow details than some of the zeiss batis lenses. probably one of the best 40mm lenses on the market. its like what 1-2 years old? and its already being used in fashion and fine art more than some of the 35mm's. already saw dozens of snoy togs use and promote this lens so it must be real good.
>>4156323Tell us more about all the huskies you shoot for vogue
>>4156335nigga those are not my images i just what lens he uses, or at least hwat i think he uses becuase the exif only said its a 40mm f2.5 and im guessing its the sony G 40mm. and you commented on 3d pop bullshit so i responded
>>4156375>damage controlSigma isn't good enough for dog pictures huh?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera Softwarepaint.net 5.0.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpi
>>4156389You just know
>>4156323>snoy>best 40mm on the marketlol, lmao even
>>4156431>Reee sony has to be bad! snoy! waaaaah snoy waaaaaaaah>;_;and other things unique to /p/
>>4156414You totally fried that poor birdAre you editing on a decent accurate screen?
>>4156433I mean the aperture ring is nice, but optically it's not better than the nikon that costs a third and is 2/3 of a stop faster (and isn't made in china)
>>4156443Not in the slightest.
>>4156599It’s optically near identical, maybe slightly superior, and weather sealed. >fasterNo one takes good photos under f4. If anything it should be slower.
>>4156900>weather sealedso is the nikon >No one takes good photos under f4having > needing
>>4153247Unironically the first one looks better. Better contrast, skin looks more alive (arm is too desaturated and face lacks contrast), eyes look realistic instead of Blade 3 cgi.>>4153266The fix would be to take better pictures in here.>>4153271Great, simple edition, does all it needs to do. No cheap tricks.>>4154680Low contrast might seem to be a time saver to make shit looks good, but frankly it doesnt. Have a proper black point.>>4154709Awesome. A bit overexposed.>>415498410/10>>4156121Works well enough. Pretty minimalistic. >>4156414You are not afraid of contrast and colors, which is great, but calibrate your screenI'll post later some shit I did
>>4153247Wow you managed to make the model look much older, and her skin darker, which probably she would not like. News flash: It doesn't make the picture better.
>>4157146Just saying what others did. She loved the photos she came back.
>>4156994>>4153271 #Great, simple edition, does all it needs to do. No cheap tricks.Thanks. It still looks a bit dark for my liking, but with the strong gray overcast i can’t really brighten things much more without getting into that “overdone” look. Even with local edits like gradients and such, just doesn’t look much better. Overcast light is still a challenge.