File: 0224230903-01.jpg (1.86 MB, 1920x2560)

1.86 MB JPG

Beat me to the new thread, copy and paste this into the next one

Previous >>4139133
/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is hipster bullshit

>negative film ages better than positive
>black and white better than color
>slow films better than fast
>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years

>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops over exposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited

>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.
If you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 process

[massive dev chart]
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php
[film dev] shows results of development regimes
https://filmdev.org/
[news]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQDKONSvogU
[community links] (needs more)
https://www.35mmc.com/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	LM-G900
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Sensing Method	Not Defined
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 11:18:20
Exposure Time	1/1724 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	D65
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.81 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	2560
White Balance	Auto

File: 20230220_104024.jpg (2.2 MB, 4032x3024)

2.2 MB JPG

beers on film, the highest form of art

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G781U1
Camera Software	G781U1UEU9FWA7
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:20 10:40:24
Exposure Time	1/586 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	40
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	7.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	5.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	X12QSND02PM

>>4146293
I hope that you also developed that on beer son

File: IMG_20230224_094119_537.jpg (30 KB, 612x455)

30 KB JPG

>>4146285
Found this on reddit a while ago. Still holds today

my Pentax IQZoom has a "panoramic" switch that just cuts off the top and bottom of the frame. I'm assuming there's some post processing step to handle these types of pictures as the manual says to notify the lab so they can handle them (assuming they have the capability).

what's the step(s) the lab does with these? is it more of a printing thing?

File: FlyG_MLWAAETQup.jpg (1.77 MB, 3072x4096)

1.77 MB JPG

>>4146285
If you want decent image quality out of your negs without wanting to rig up a DSLR scanning thing then this is about as good as it gets. Slow but gets the job done, however the backlight is too weak to scan reversal film effectively so if you like to shoot a lot of that in 35mm then DSLR scanning is pretty much your only option.

>>4146359
I have a Nikon es2 and a 50mm f2.8z to scan some positives. Not really worth the effort. Pretty content with my flatbeds honestly.

>>4146344
I started DSLR scanning after a flatbed scan from a lab pissed me off. Some cheap film scanners are surprisingly good for what they are though, see Kodak Pakon 135. Megapixel count is low but the quality is pretty good.

File: image-asset.jpg (408 KB, 2500x1981)

408 KB JPG

>>4146344
Forgot pix

>bought an old epson scanner for $80
>has the brackets for medium format and 4x5 and gives me the same resolution as my local lab
>also has the brackets for 35mm strips and slides, but dpi is too low for that
I feel so fucking lucky

File: ZBKEKTAUT2104.jpg (3.28 MB, 1980x1978)

3.28 MB JPG

>>4146391
If it came with 4x5 holders then you got yourself a V800, which is the same machine most labs use at least around here for scanning MF and sheet. It's a good find for sure. Even just for MF it's a significant improvement from V500/600.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	559 dpi
Vertical Resolution	559 dpi
Image Created	2021:12:29 20:28:14
Image Width	14024
Image Height	14007

>>4146403
>v800
no, it's an old ass scanner, like epson photo perfect 6530 or something

File: positif-16.jpg (2.3 MB, 3037x4602)

2.3 MB JPG

Got myself a V600
It's alright
Doing proper color reversal on negatives in lightroom is a bitch tho, i will definitely cop the NegativeLab add-on
(yeah i forgot to do the white balance on this one)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	228 dpi
Vertical Resolution	228 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:22 23:18:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4146405
Guess a precursor to the V800 then. But if it works it works.

File: KC35KGSYD23204.jpg (2.12 MB, 2000x1333)

2.12 MB JPG

Some shits from the bloom machine.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 20:53:00
Image Width	10200
Image Height	6768

File: KC35KGSYD23206.jpg (2.7 MB, 1303x2000)

2.7 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 20:57:16
Image Width	6744
Image Height	10176

File: KC35KGSYD23209.jpg (2.94 MB, 1335x2000)

2.94 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 21:13:06
Image Width	6792
Image Height	10128

File: KC35KGSYD23213.jpg (3 MB, 1293x2000)

3 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 21:23:23
Image Width	6744
Image Height	10224

File: KC35KGSYD23217.jpg (2.62 MB, 2000x1323)

2.62 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 21:56:46
Image Width	10176
Image Height	6768

File: image0255.jpg (2.1 MB, 2613x1275)

2.1 MB JPG

I love seeing all the little clouds of dye working together to make an image.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7650
Image Height	5100
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 21:18:24
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2613
Image Height	1275

>>4146413
This one is really great, the rest need a bit better execution.

>>4146413
Beautiful, but that thing's going to rot unless someone flips it.

>>4146413
Lovely, looks like a painting. Expired Portra?

Can anyone find or take a picture of the DX code contacts on a roll of velvia 50 or Ektachrome? I am trying to make sense of how they code the last two contacts for slide film in auto exposure cameras.

Please post if you find.

>>4146288
thank you for this. It was well past time to stop the spoonfeeding.

>>4146437
Gold overexposed by two stops by accident.

>>4146345
I did a little digging and other cameras have it too and as I thought, it's just a gimmick to give the picture a panorama "look" by cutting off the top and bottom of the frame. kinda lame but at least it doesn't hinder anything about the camera

File: PXL_20230224_221303913-01.jpg (752 KB, 1500x2000)

752 KB JPG

>>4146438
The Wikipedia page explains it perfectly well. DX only tells iso and roll length, and most cameras can't even read the last part of the dx code anyway.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX_encoding

Here's velvia 50 and provia 100f anyway.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	Pixel 6a
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:24 18:13:36
Exposure Time	4169/500000 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1027
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Brightness	0.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.13 m
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.38 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>4146456
so YOU'RE why film is so expensive now.....

Sent in 3 rolls of film out of my pentax z-20 for development. Hope they turn out well

I've kinda asked this question a few times before but what setup would get me 8/10 quality scans but with the shortest/fastest time from starting scan to having my jpgs/tiffs? I shoot 95% 35mm 5% 6x9. Scanning a roll is $10 Australian at my local lab. I would like a setup that costs max 600$ but emphasis on the time aspect. I really don't spend much time editing, all I do is color cast/white balance/crop and I kinda can't be fucked manually adjusting shit when scanning eah frame. Bonus points if I can scan 35mm pano in 6x9

File: 1.jpg (425 KB, 1342x899)

425 KB JPG

Only got into photography and film this year. Any feedback appreciated

>>4146413
Ethereal af

>>4146406
Late 20th century Mediterranean art film vibes

File: 2.jpg (528 KB, 1232x1840)

528 KB JPG

>>4146461

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: PXL_20230216_054517795.jpg (1.93 MB, 3072x4080)

1.93 MB JPG

>>4146456
Pretty sure I've tried to buy film from this anon.

>>4146457
I've spammed this pick and I'll do it again

>>4146285
No, 6 hours to scan a 36 roll of film, you have feed and manually activate each scan, and you're left with an overcooked hpeg you can barely correct oh and there's no ICE so it'll be covered I'm dust unless you meticulously clean each frame before you scan, making 6 hours into 8 hours, just use your dslr/mirrorless and a light board

>>4146406
Just do a preset with inverted curves bro

File: Screenshot_2023-02-25-14-(...).jpg (809 KB, 1080x2340)

809 KB JPG

I bulk rolled some Kodak double x about a week ago. Left the rolls on my floor (probably 20-25c temperature). Left a leader out obviously but then when I went to use the roll just now, I pulled a bit more out and there was this distinct color where the leader was left out. Photo is shit but right side was olive color, left was more regular greenish. Anyone know why?

>>4146528
i'm assuming the effect of exposing light sensitive material to light?...

>>4146534
Most likely but I don't think I have ever seen it this pronounced before (I'm honestly not sure if I've ever noticed it at all desu) just weirded me out a bit

>>4146456
Thank you very much for this. Whether read or not (I suspect the higher end compacts do read the exposure details, the Olympus Stylus manual implies this when it mentions positive film metering differently and providing lesser exposure under flash), I wanted to know if the last two dx contacts had the 1/2 stop +- indication on slide film.

>>4146528
spooky. Have seen this before forget what film, but in any case it developed fine.

>>4146489
I didn't even know how an histogram looked until i used LR for the first time this month, so imagine doing and making a preset lol

File: R1-01078-0009.jpg (2.4 MB, 1709x1228)

2.4 MB JPG

I just realised, other more edgy boards have scared most people from going on 4chan, meaning that we have a nice small community of passionate photographers with barely any normies :) Hopefully it stays that way.

Anyway, new roll came in today.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Pentax
Camera Model	P30n
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2022:12:15 11:01:34 AM
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	500
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>4146460
>I kinda can't be fucked manually adjusting shit when scanning eah frame
don't bother.

someone in the previous thread recommended oly e-m5 mk2 for film scanning
any recos for a cheap macro lens to go with this camera for the one and only purpose of digitizing/scanning film
b&w and color negs

>>4146640
are those tiny trees or a tall person?

File: DSC04524editSMBRD.jpg (642 KB, 1300x1300)

642 KB JPG

>>4146457
I bought all this shit years ago.

>>4146476
What'd you try to buy? I ain't selling the good stuff.

>>4146617
No problem. I'd be very surprised if a stylus can read that as it only has 4 dx contact points. Def could be wrong though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: PXL_20230225_143813654.jpg (2.1 MB, 4032x3024)

2.1 MB JPG

I wanted to start developing my own film and a friend got me this chemical bottle off work for free. Anyone have an idea how I can make sure there's no Methanol left in there?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	Pixel 4 XL
Camera Software	Google
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Image Created	2023:02:25 15:55:03
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
ISO Speed Rating	52
Exposure Program	Normal Program
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Time	10503/250000 sec
Subject Distance Range	Macro
Sharpness	Normal
Focal Length	4.38 mm
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance	0.28 m
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	3024
White Balance	Auto
Brightness	2.1 EV
Image Width	4032
Exposure Mode	Auto
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom

File: img272-1.jpg (812 KB, 1024x683)

812 KB JPG

>>4146366
>cheap film scanners
>Pakon 135.
"Cheap" is relative, but you are trolling.
That being said, mine has been collecting dust for at least 5 years. I should probably cash out.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>4146709
Just wash it in your sink, methanol is perfectly miscible with water

did a rodinal 1+50 for 24 minutes development of HP5+ shot at 1600 today bros, negatives look a little weak maybe I should've done the 1+25 for 12 minutes recipe

>>4146959
unless you have to, dont push in rodinal

>>4147055
why?

>>4146293
wtf is that bokeh

>>4146905
I wasn't trolling, I was just wrong. I was under the impression it could be had for about $600 or less for some reason, call it false memory.

>>4146461
>>4146462
these are decent shots anon good job.
they are clean and somewhat pleasing, the only thing about them is that they are a bit uninteresting to look at. try and find some more interesting scenes to shoot. just keep it up!

Anyone know what the cheapest options are for red green and blue filters are for someone who wants to try trchrome photography? I know I need an R25A, 58 green and 47B blue but what are the closest 'aproximates' I can buy to not need to pay 20-30 bucks per filter?

It depends partly on your filter size but you could try pig iron filters.
They claim to be as good as hoya but half the cost, whether that's the case I don't know yet as I haven't developed the roll I shot with their red filter but that could work at least just for the red
For blue and green you might find a decently price hoya filter on ebay or something.
Just try to get the filters for the largest lens size you're willing to use then step up rings to make up any difference, should save you some money if you want to do trichroming with more than the one lens

>>4147075
it's a tree

>>4146413
>>4146437
>looks like a painting
Was thinking the same thing. Almost German Romantic?

any anons here use box cameras that could give some tips on it's usage?
Got a kodak brownie 620 model c from a family friend.
I worked out it has a preset shutter speed and a bulb setting, what's a good way to shoot this thing?
I know I can also just buy expired 620 film or respool 120 so at least I don't need to self-dev

File: 427661490025.jpg (1.08 MB, 1545x1024)

1.08 MB JPG

Shot on some 10+ year old film that my nana (who has been into fotography since before I was born 31 years ago) gave me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.20.004 (200730)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

>>4147226
nice colours anon, what film?

File: Doggie.jpg (740 KB, 1210x1024)

740 KB JPG

>>4147230
Thanks pal. Fucked if I know really; it was last summer. Provia 100f *maybe*. I do think it was slide film hence the weird colours.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 17:48:49
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

>>4146285
so ive shot some cans of film through my z-20
Do you guys have any reccomendations on film to shoot?

Shot
>Ultramax 400
>Fujicolor 200 (stuff you can get in stores)
>Illford HP5 400

want to shoot
>Proimage 100
>ektar 100
>amber d400
>Cinestill 800t
>Portra 400
>fomapan 400

Any others i should consider/hunt down?

>>4147345
Fuji Superia 400
Fuji Neopan Acros II
Ferrania P30
JCH Streetpan 400

File: image.png (2.49 MB, 1600x1067)

2.49 MB PNG

>>4147345
Try pro image next. It's especially nice in snow due to its inherent warmth.

You gotta try a slide film. E100 or Provia whichever you can find for less.

File: C8FB8166-02D5-4225-B15A-F(...).jpg (3.82 MB, 4032x3024)

3.82 MB JPG

Studio 35 200 was the sharpest 35mm film. It was discontinued 10 years ago and nobody froze any of it. If you never tried it, too bad so sad.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone
Camera Software	HUJI CAM
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:11:30 15:53:09
Exposure Time	1/1972 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	25
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	10.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto

>>4146285
I bought the 8200i SE almost 2 years ago. I already own an Epson v550 that I use for 120 and modded it for 4x5 negs. I also have access to a v850 at work.

Reasons I like it:
>Small AF, can literally fit in a small backpack or on a cluttered desk. Very portable.
>No moving parts unlike flatbed, less to break
>Silent unlike flatbed
>Comes with a nice case, seriously
>You can 3d print yourself 8mm and 16mm/110 holders
>Image quality surpasses any 35mm scans I have done before it

Reasons I would not buy an 8200:
>Not a do all scanner. More of a 35mm luxury item.
>The included software sucks badly.
>No batch processing.
>Some of the older hardware such as the 7200/7400 may fit your needs instead. That is your call.
>The IR dust/scratch feature does not work with silver halide emulsions.

That said, I do like mine a lot.

File: 2023-02-26-0001.jpg (2.83 MB, 2801x2571)

2.83 MB JPG

>>4146285
Never used it but always hear nice comments about it, the only think is that to my understanding you have to move each frame into the thing.

I have a Minolta Dimage that I took from the trash and got serviced. I love the little bastard like you have no idea, but its slow and really noisy.

Anyway.

First time bulk loading, for some reason got fogging on two different rolls on the same place. I was able to salvage some, so have some weekend snapshits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 19:58:17
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 2023-02-26-0004.jpg (2.83 MB, 3695x2073)

2.83 MB JPG

>>4147415

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 19:59:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 2023-02-26-0003.jpg (2.48 MB, 2559x2518)

2.48 MB JPG

>>4147416

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 19:58:48
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 2023-02-26-0006.jpg (3.35 MB, 2580x3876)

3.35 MB JPG

>>4147418
have a few more but too lazy to scan them today

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 20:33:36
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 69ca0137-bbbb-47c7-ae84-b(...).jpg (2.93 MB, 2731x4096)

2.93 MB JPG

>>4147401
>sharpest film ever
>35mm film

35mm is not it bro

>>4147224
bulb with tripod/bright day out/open shutter->handheld flash->close shutter indoors

respool 120 it's so fucking easy do it in the dark at night or in a film change bag.

>>4147401
love this post

>>4147430
new york anon what will he shoot?

>>4147416
>>4147418
those look like light leaks man.
i like the car snap

>>4147520
sharpest on 35mm? probably provia 100 if he's ok shooting slide if he wants colour.

i would at least shoot 645.

>>4147401
>caring about sharpness, ever
>caring about sharpness on film
too bad, so sad.

File: Stacja górska.jpg (386 KB, 1920x1291)

386 KB JPG

>>4146285
My experience with the Plustek-Scanner has been consistently negative:

I was looking for an inexpensive way to digitize all my slides and negatives, but had to realize, however, that the device is much too slow for large quantities and can only be loaded with relative difficulty, and I never got a handle on the color space profile in underexposed shots.
I also always had problems when the slide wasn't completely flat, but had slightly rippled over the years in the frame without glass.

I thought the side dust protection flaps were a good idea, until I realized after a while that they are actually supposed to protect against dust from the outside, but then more protect the dust inside!
I have no way of getting decent access to the inside of the optics to clean them without completely disassembling the entire device.
It was very frustrating!

Now I use a slide copy attachment with a bellows extension for my SLR with a macro lens, which is significantly faster and I have more options for intervention.

It was a lot more expensive to buy, but in terms of quantity, the cost per scanned photo is just about 2 cents per picture.
Together with the significant time savings and the better results, this is very acceptable to me.

Ultimately, with the resolution of the SLR, even with ASA 100, you can now see the grain of the film more than the pixels.
With the Ectachrome 400 I mostly use, interesting effects result from the coarser film grain. I like this.

>>4147345
unless you live in the big city, ditch the Cinestill 800t and use a Portra 800
instead of foma 400 use foma 100 and push it 2 stops
try to cop a roll of Cinestill 50d and Kodak Tri-X

>>4146285
Nah, put the money towards a digital camera.

File: 1555600434443.jpg (31 KB, 483x461)

31 KB JPG

>dropped a still wet roll of film on the dirty bathroom floor when hanging to dry
tried to gently wipe off the nasty stuff with some toilet paper

>>4147596
i would just have rinsed it under the tap and squeegee'd it again

>>4147597
yeah i think that would have been a good choice
shower head's right next to the film strip
i am a retard

File: PXL_20230227_140500766.jpg (629 KB, 1537x2347)

629 KB JPG

>>4147596
oh well, you can barely see the dust because the scans are so poor

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	Pixel 4a
Camera Software	darktable 4.2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:02:27 16:14:48
Exposure Time	10013/500000 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	147
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Brightness	1.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.13 m
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.38 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1537
Image Height	2347
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	2.9
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: PXL_20230227_134322633.jpg (183 KB, 1101x1463)

183 KB JPG

>>4147621
ya ever snap some pics while /o/ut driving?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Google
Camera Model	Pixel 4a
Camera Software	darktable 4.2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:02:27 16:37:15
Exposure Time	639/1000000 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	55
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Brightness	8.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.13 m
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.38 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1101
Image Height	1463
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	2.9
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: 2023-02-26-0008.jpg (953 KB, 1943x985)

953 KB JPG

>>4147521
Yeah I know, but the light leaks were on two frames only, plus a few frames more that were completely black. Probably not the camera but the cassette/or the bulk loader.

Would try again with a camera that I am sure has no light leaks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 22:34:31
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4147558
why portra over 800t?

>>4147549
very informative thank you slavbro

File: KC35KGSYD23220.jpg (2.88 MB, 1302x2000)

2.88 MB JPG

Another day of bloomy shits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 21:14:09
Image Width	6744
Image Height	10224

File: KC35KGSYD23222.jpg (2.97 MB, 1319x2000)

2.97 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:26 21:20:46
Image Width	6816
Image Height	10152

File: KC35KGSYD23232.jpg (2.92 MB, 2000x1323)

2.92 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:27 20:30:58
Image Width	10152
Image Height	6768

File: KC35KGSYD23233.jpg (2.4 MB, 2000x1308)

2.4 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:27 20:33:26
Image Width	10104
Image Height	6768

File: KC35KGSYD23235.jpg (2.38 MB, 2000x1292)

2.38 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:27 20:40:48
Image Width	10137
Image Height	6721

finally got the Nikon 60mm macro lens for dslr scanning with the es-2 bros. I have like 6 or 7 rolls to scan

>>4146367
>used epson: $20
>pakon: ??????
I'd use a better scanner if they weren't hundreds of dollars

>>4146345
if it's not an APS camera it probably just masks the picture, but APS cameras would take the normal photo and put a code on the magstripe on the APS film that would tell the lab how you wanted it printed.

Saw a fujica rapid D1 on ebay and offered the seller £35 and he took it. Apparently its working as intended but I'm suspcious of it. Should I take it lads?

>>4147649
i just think it look better for the same speed (if you do classic box speed that is)
Cinestill is fun as a novelty because of the lights glows, but that's it, the super cold tones is a turn off
also you can use Portra 800 during regular daylight without needing a warming up filter, so that's a plus

>>4147765
>fujica rapid D1
It's 35 bucks lad, do it and if its shit just sell it untested to some zoomer lol

>>4147765
do you have rapid cassettes? you need two

File: 1.jpg (1.88 MB, 4096x5792)

1.88 MB JPG

that's a lot of grain!
>fomapan 400, 25+ years expired, stored in room temperature

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.20
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	472 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	472 dpcm
Image Created	2023:02:27 23:30:31
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 3819.jpg (723 KB, 2500x1149)

723 KB JPG

Found three rolls of old film laying around in my uncles house. I dont know how old are those shots, perhaps around late 90's early 00's.
Anyway, scanned using my D7000 and white background full brightness on my phone. Dont' know any better.
>picrel is day of the alphabet in a rural Ukrainian school.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4299
Image Height	1976
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:28 00:40:10
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2500
Image Height	1149

>>4146288
I found a roll of Kodak Gold 400 in my parents garage fridge, it's probably from early - mid 2000s and stored in the fridge that whole time. still shoot it at 200? dunno if my local lab does push/pull development for C-41 (they only process C-41)

File: 3824.jpg (979 KB, 2500x1184)

979 KB JPG

>>4147833
second roll of film. A cat and some middle aged women.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3724
Image Height	1764
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:28 00:40:28
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2500
Image Height	1184

File: 3825.jpg (449 KB, 2500x961)

449 KB JPG

>>4147836
This is december 2004. Center of Kyiv, Ukraine. Orange revolution.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4797
Image Height	1844
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:28 00:40:35
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2500
Image Height	961

File: 3826.jpg (822 KB, 2500x1092)

822 KB JPG

>>4147838
Carpathian Mountains.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.5 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4692
Image Height	2050
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:28 00:40:21
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2500
Image Height	1092

File: DSCF8480_02.jpg (3.89 MB, 2000x1334)

3.89 MB JPG

I scan with an old fujifilm s5 pro .. (super ccd sensor ~12mp)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix S5Pro
Camera Software	darktable 4.0.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:02:27 19:06:33
Exposure Time	1/35 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	6.2 EV
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1334
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Daylight
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Contrast	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off

File: DSCF8477_02.jpg (3.89 MB, 2000x1334)

3.89 MB JPG

>>4147884

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix S5Pro
Camera Software	darktable 4.0.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:02:27 19:25:38
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	6.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1334
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Daylight
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Contrast	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off

>>4147838
>Kyiv, Ukraine
What side of country is this on? Hopefully not impacted by the war

>>4147401
>>4147888

File: 2023-02-14-0003.jpg (859 KB, 1700x656)

859 KB JPG

Anybody got tips for panorama composition? Googling around just gives me guides on how to make composite panoramas with digital cameras. I 3d printed a 6x12 medium format camera that works great but I'm very used to normal aspect ratios.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	PerfectionV700
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	94 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	94 dpcm
Image Created	2023:02:15 16:40:31
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4147909
Digital composite panoramas are probably harder to frame. On positive, they often give up plenty of overlap to crop in and find a good framing, but they need to be framed with naked eye. So if you can find any info on composition for them, it'll still do you good. I imagine that it's not something that's often discussed, though. Best source of information would probably be wide angle cinematography. Framing guidelines are the same. Wide lenses, making sure camera isn't far from being levelled horizontally and vertically, leading lines, framed corners...

>>4147884
Very curious about this because I considered the same option. Are your originals (not downscaled for the chins) visibly more detailed than this?

>>4147122
Tyvm for the feedback.
> not interesting
Welcome to England XD
I will look out for more interesting subjects esp when I travel

>>4147833
>>4147836
>>4147838
>>4147839
Hy кypвa, нeвжe тaк вaжкo вiдcкaнyвaти нe нa MФУ a хoч нa Hopiтcy?
>>4147888
Anon, it's the capital. Remember battles for Hostomel and Bucha massacre? Those cities are Kyїv's suburbs. There was almost no fighting in the city itself, but it was bombed with cruise and ballistic missiles

File: MORIYAMAdaido_filmograph6(...).jpg (123 KB, 570x786)

123 KB JPG

Gifted a Contax T and some rolls of tri-x 400. Never shot film before. I'm looking to shoot nightime street photography and indoors with flash. How would I go about getting the gritty high contrast look of Daido Moriyama? I've read he shot Tri-x at 1600 ISO. My camera goes up to 800 ISO, should I try shooting at 800 and push +2 stops?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3400
Image Height	4680
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2014:09:24 16:03:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	570
Image Height	786

>>4148037
Tri x 400 is a 400 ISO film. The dial tells the meter which speed film you've got in your Camera.
If you want to push your Film to 1600, you need to meter and shoot as if your film was 1600 ISO and push your film for the stop difference between 400iso and 1600iso. 400 to 1600 is three stops.
Not every lab does this but if you're developing yourself you can obviously do whatever you want.

As your cameras meter doesn't go to 1600 you might need to get an external meter and set your exposure according to that. No need for anything fancy, phone apps work fine

File: DSCF8419_01.jpg (4.6 MB, 1704x2556)

4.6 MB JPG

>>4148021
hardly. I keep noise reduction turned off because it helps a little. My light table also isn't the greatest

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix S5Pro
Camera Software	darktable 4.0.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:02:02 21:14:50
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	5.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1704
Image Height	2556
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Daylight
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Contrast	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off

>>4148037
You can also just shoot at 400 and increase the contrast in post.

>>4147888
capital. Used to be active warzone, not anymore.
>>4148028
Ta я бiдний cтyдeнт, нa шo мiг пoзвoлити, нa тo i вiдcкaнyвaв) Дoмa є шe цiлий мiшoк тих плiвoк, тoмy хoчy лiтoм зaйнятиcь i вжe фaйнo вiдcкaнyвaти

File: amazon_basics.jpg (60 KB, 796x715)

60 KB JPG

>>4148052
>400 to 1600 is three stops.
It's two stops

>>4148037
>>4148052
Tri-X at 1600 ISO is just +2 stop.
Set your lightmeter to 800 ISO, and when it tells you the correct exposure just add a stop of either shutter speed or aperture
exemple :
> if the camera set at 800 ISO tells you the picture is good at f/4 & 1/30sec, then the right setting at 1600 ISO is either f/4 & 1/60sec OR f/2.8 & 1/30sec
Also make sure to tell the lab to push it +2 when deving, otherwise your pictures will be too underexposed to be used

today I am going to push Shanghai GP3 100 to 400.
For science.

>>4148052
>>4148148
The contax T does not have manual controls for shutter speed, it's only aperture priority.

>>4148037
Shoot at 800 and push 1 stop. You will get one stop less of shutter speed, but that's just the limitation of your camera you have to live with. You can increase the contrast further afterwards, either when printing or digitally.

>>4148069
Tи звiдки?

>>4147520
I've heard you don't even need to respool 120 if you use some nail clippers to trim the edge of the spool.
Got any recs for film to try with this?
I was going to assume something like foma so I don't break the bank fucking up

>>4148244
Львiвcькa oблacть

How well does fomapan 100 push to 400?
Been thinking about getting a 10 pack but I think 100 is a bit slow

>>4147201
no the bokeh is all square

>>4148254
Гapнe cepeдoвищe!
Miй дiдycь бyв тaм двa чи тpи poки i мapив poдючicтю ґpyнтy тa пpocтopoм зeмлi.

File: wtf.jpg (442 KB, 1250x980)

442 KB JPG

filmfluencers really look at a shot like this and think "yeah that looks good"

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4148351
But it does look good.

>>4148351
post-pastoral pictures are better than 90% of streetshitters subjects, i get what you mean though.

>>4148351
it's a cute little barn, what's wrong with it?

>>4148351
>filmfluencers
what the fuck are you trying to say

>>4148358
>>4148362
the exposure and contrast is dogshit, are you dumb

>>4148393
>>4148353
meant to tag this post and not the second one

>>4148393
Good point. I still think it's a great photo though.

>>4148393
that's vintage baybee

>>4148393
We don't know if this was shoot on expired film or something

File: 32C91837-8458-4C65-8693-9(...).jpg (1.02 MB, 1024x1545)

1.02 MB JPG

I have no idea what I’m doing but I’m having fun while I do it.

F100, 35mm f2 @ f8, HP5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

File: A4FDC096-622D-45C5-A991-2(...).jpg (994 KB, 1545x1024)

994 KB JPG

>>4148428
2/5

Also shot a roll of expired Ektar 100 from 2010 that must have been stored in a cigar humidor

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

File: 8D6FE9C2-8C5D-4FBD-920A-6(...).jpg (1003 KB, 1545x1024)

1003 KB JPG

>>4148431
3/5
I expected it to be trash

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

File: 6A8AC372-5DD3-44E9-9499-8(...).jpg (1013 KB, 1545x1024)

1013 KB JPG

>>4148434
Just not THIS bad

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

File: inline_image_preview.jpg (17 KB, 590x332)

17 KB JPG

>>4146293
>trees
What the fuck that looks amazing.
>bokeh is blocks
This isn't minecraft buddy.

File: BE8B41C1-FB7D-4FF9-B293-4(...).jpg (1 MB, 1545x1024)

1 MB JPG

>>4148435
5/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

>>4148437
spooky ghost ship bro

>>4148435
I really like this one

>>4148431
that's a fucking mood though

>>4148254
Бля, тoдi oй. Дyмaв лaбy пopaдити. Хiбa щo в TG пoшyкaй чaт West Film, мб тaм дoпoмoжyть

>>4148037
the contax T goes to 1000, set it at 1000, that's 2 thirds off 1600.
your developer will also play a part in how the negative turns out. pushing it 800+ kills shadow detail and increases contrast, but with a comepnsating developer like diafine you can recover a lot of shadow detail. XTOl is probably more forgiving as well. with something like d76 you're probably getting something similar to moriyama's style. I would not recommend rodinal.

>>4148532
Except there's literally no difference in dev time and look when developing tri-x @ 800 in d76.

can you push black and white film with stand development?
is there stand development for color film?

>>4148584
Yes
No

>>4148308
Є тaкe, Зaхiд тo дyжe дoбpa чacтинa нeньки
>>4148507
Дякyю, a ти caм звiдки?

>>4147724
How are you attaching it to the lens?

I have the same lens. Super nice for non macro stuff, too

>>4148649
Київ

Started film half a year ago and worked thru some ghetto solutions (window and phone cam, acrylic glass, monitor, flash, etc)
For 35mm, i have one of those negative holders that comes with a backlight and holds a strip of 6 pictures.
Then there are some metal rails (flash holders + table tripod) to perfectly hold my camera in place (A Fujifilm X-T2 with 35mmF2.0 + Macro adapter).
The camera is thetered and each picture taken is automatically stored on my PC, negated + orange mask removed.
To speed up the process, i just attach the full length 35mm strip to the holder an pull it through.
Yes, this scratches the film in theroy, but never enough for me to notice.
The only problem, and i never though i had to admit it, is corner sharpness.
It's bad enough that i have to go to F16 on the lens to get useable "scanned" negative.

For medium format, I gave up and give into an Epson V850 Pro + Paid for the SilverFast Software.
I take all the goddies like the infrared scratch removal and automatic color calibration, the JPGs are quite useable.
The downside is that it takes forever. It's not so bad for 6x4.5 medium format where scanning takes like 20 minutes for a 120 roll.
But for the 35mm film, it simply takes way to long to set it up and batch scan.

Anyone dev with Ilfosol 3 ?
I got gifted a bunch of it but i feel like it kill my contrasts
Also anyone ever pushed Foma 100 with it ? Massive dev gives nothing

>>4148651
with the longer tube attachment but re-reading the es-2 instructions I see it says that this lens is going to crop my frames when using a D-series Nikon, which it does, so now I have to return it and get the 40mm macro for my camera...

Accidentally bought a large format camera as a joke and got a lot more than I thought I would. What the fuck have I done.

File: flic film.jpg (85 KB, 645x645)

85 KB JPG

This film sucks. Why was it used for aerial surveilance?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.24
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:12:19 14:41:56

>>4148735
it was a different time, it was fresh

>>4148735
Because every war after ww1 has been fake.

>>4148721
sell it to me
what did you bought

>>4147430
>>4147547
It was professional quality film without the professional price. Even the Walgreen's disposable cameras were sharp and better than name brand. Cope.

File: file.png (1.85 MB, 1458x817)

1.85 MB PNG

>>4148745
>Sinar F bundle being sold for £540
>offer the dude £400 and he accepts
>get a Sinar F with Rodenstock Sironar 150mm F5.6 (delaminating) and Schneider-Kreuznach Super-Angulon 90mm F8
>Sinar copal shutter
>5 4x5 film holders
>2 roll film holders
>Sinar binocular reflex viewer
>polaroid image splitter kit
>extra bellows
>drops it off for me the same day I buy it
shitty phone picrel is what I got, shame about the delaminating lens and the copal shutter needs a bit of a service but can't really complain considering what I got.
Need to buy a case for it but guess I'll be shooting large format now.

>>4148759
oh I can't count it's 6 film holders not 5, and no idea what the little tool in the white packaging is for.

>>4148759
>>4148721
>Accidentally bought a large format camera as a joke

>I'm accidentally message a stranger
>I accidentally negotiate a price with him
>Then I accidentally went to my bank and withdrew the exact of amount of money I negotiated
>I accidentally send him my address where he accidentally delivered the camera
>I accidentally pay him for the camera

Weird joke, but okay.

>>4148767
Well I was at work and my coworker browsing ebay and saw the bundle, and thought it would be funny to lowball the buy with a price that no sane person would accept. I didn't message and negotiate a price I literally just sent an offer for much lower than it was worth using the ebay offer feature since he was accepting.

Once he accepted I just followed through with the purchase because why wouldn't I for that price?

>>4148772
He probably did the same exact thing and just wanted it to be gone. You'll do the same. It's a vicious cycle of buyers remorse.

>>4148778
When he brought it to me he said he mostly deals in arriflexes but sometimes sells other stuff and his ebay page reflects that. Said since it wasn't fully working he just wanted it gone.

Once I get my kicks out of it I'll probably pass it on to another but I have actually been wanting to get a large format camera to try out.

>>4148739
It is fresh, dum-dum
>>4148735
Post scans

>>4148699
even one of those chinese macros will improve your mirroless scans

Someone is selling an unopened bulk reel of Kodak Panatomic-X that expired in 1980 on craigslist for 40$. I want to buy it.

How annoying is bulk film loading?

>>4148860
looks really easy based on the youtube videos I've watched

File: Screenshot_20230301_23131(...).jpg (402 KB, 1080x2267)

402 KB JPG

>>4148705
try this from the MDC website

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android TP1A.220624.014.G781U1UES9FWB1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	2267
Image Orientation	Unknown

File: FqMIqfuaYAATsGI.jpg (3.69 MB, 4096x3043)

3.69 MB JPG

3 d p o p

File: Eastman 5222--9.jpg (2.1 MB, 5285x3523)

2.1 MB JPG

I was caught in a straight up sand storm just outside Albuquerque.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:23 06:08:02
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Eastman 5222--14.jpg (2.13 MB, 5202x3468)

2.13 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:02:23 06:08:06
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4147834
200 and pull.
>>4148860
buy it, buy a bulk loader, do it in a dark bag, store film can in fridge.
>>4149015
how did you do this?

>>4149024
>how did you do this
Do what? Take a photo? I mean, it's alright to look at but there's nothing 3d about it. It's just a half decent photo.

Wait are you meant to store film in the fridge?