[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 15000_dn5s-23.jpg (33 KB, 1200x900)
33 KB
33 KB JPG
Just bought this
What to expect?
>>
Disappointment
>>
First off, what did you buy it for? Do you shoot sports or wildlife? You need to let us know these things, anon.
>>
>>4129675
What lens is that?
>>
Is that a Sigma lens?
>>
>>4129685
Wildlife
Bird photography especially
I came with protective filter and sigma dock
Upgrading from a shitty Canon 75-300 kit lens
>>
>>4129720
>Upgrading from a shitty Canon 75-300 kit lens
hope you don't use AF, since it'll be a downgrade from that. 3rd party lenses are notorious for bad AF especially at supertelephoto focal lengths
>>
Nothing.

A 120-300 2.8 plus 1.4 or 2 teleconverter (in case you need that reach) is all you need
>>
>>4129732
Depends on the lens. Obviously if you buy an f/6.3 supertelecrap consumer lens you get what you pay for



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.