Cheap film

But who is the cheapest develop+scan service
>inb4 DIY
Fuck doing it with C41 + breakeven point is 2 years from now so I do it when I finally get a macro lens for actual macro

File: Roll2_020.jpg (1.89 MB, 3000x1999)

1.89 MB JPG

we love superia

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Adobe Systems Inc.
Camera Model	Tiff File
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 13:37:45
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1999

File: Roll2_023.jpg (1.83 MB, 3000x1999)

1.83 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Adobe Systems Inc.
Camera Model	Tiff File
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 13:37:46
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1999

>>4128222
Any of you post your pictures on lomography? I’m thinking of moving there from instagram since instagram is dogshit

>>4128261
i dont. i used to check out film stocks and lenses on it but i fucking cant anymore. all the photos are euros being fucking weird. it's like portra triple exposed on a holga of some latvian barn, or black and white leica nudes of some german dentists hot flemish wife. flickr seems superior.

>>4128227
>But who is the cheapest develop+scan service
Developing C-41 at a local lab and camera scanning at home has been the cheapest for me. I think it's $6 a roll for both and once you get the hang of it scanning goes quickly.

Like you said C-41 development isn't worth it unless you're shooting a ton.

File: Roll1_012.jpg (1.36 MB, 3000x1988)

1.36 MB JPG

>>4128272
aside from the one Hawaii lab I found, none of the labs on the east coast offer C-41 anywhere near 6$. Where are you sending your rolls to?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 13:35:47
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1988

>>4128271
>s are euros being fucking weird. it's like portra triple exposed on a holga of some latvian barn, or black and white leica nudes of some german dentists hot flemish wife
You make it sound better that it actually is

File: 000030_1.jpg (2.84 MB, 3556x5328)

2.84 MB JPG

I've been an avid Minolta guy for a few years now. Though the weight of my SRT303b is kinda getting to me recently. Also no meter, but that's whatever to be honest.
I'm looking into Olympus as an alternative, love the way their lenses feel.
Is an OM-4 with an Olympus Zuiko 50mm F1.8 a good parallel/substitute for the SRT303b + MC Rokkor 50mm F1.4 I've been daily driving?
Or would I be better off with a Pentax ME Super and a SMC Pentax M 50mm F1.8?

Also, anyone ever use an Olympus Pen/Pen ft? I've seen some pictures taken with the 38mm f1.8 and I quite liked it. Been thinking of getting one.

Main focus is on the camera bodies. The day I care about the pixel peeping in film photography is the day I commit suicide.
>Pic taken on expired mystery ferrania film, in the minolta gear listed above

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.9
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3556
Image Height	5328
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2021:12:17 17:52:47

>>4128271
All I see is poorly scanned Malaysian street photography (also the weirdly saturated triple exposures in Europe, you're right about that.)

File: 000061_1-1.jpg (1.63 MB, 3531x5290)

1.63 MB JPG

>>4128222
I hate fomapan, but sometimes that's all they got at my local film shop.
Foma 100 always gives me blacks that are too black.
Foma 400 has so much grain it's not even funny anymore.
>Pic on Foma 100

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.9
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3531
Image Height	5290
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2022:12:07 12:34:10

File: image_2023-01-22_195436795.png (87 KB, 757x860)

87 KB PNG

>>4128274
That's roughly been the price for local labs at the past two cities I've lived in, in the Southeastern US. Here's the price sheet for my current lab. Turns out it's $6.50 but whatever. The lab is on my way to work so I also save on shipping cost.

>>4128291
Lucked out on my city. Northern Portugal area.
Developing + Scanning for 6 euros. 5 if you are ok with JPEGs instead of TIFF.

>>4128255
Nice shot but I think those holes staring at you ruin it a little. Cunts

>local lab charges 12 bucks for B&W
fuck them

>>4128261
I use Grainery.app instead of Instagram

>>4128308
my old lab charged $22 for b&w dev + scans
my new local lab only devs color but I do b&w dev at home now so that's OK

File: Roll2_025 1.jpg (3.6 MB, 2048x1365)

3.6 MB JPG

>>4128291
Cursed with 11$ C-41 but also blessed with 13$ E-6 where I am.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Adobe Systems Inc.
Camera Model	Tiff File
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 13:37:46
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4128313
Holy shit.
Same I do b&w dev and scan at home too. Seen a store near me selling a kit for C41... but man color film is really expensive.

>>4128317
Walmart had 3pks of Fujifilm Superia 400 for like $23 last summer but now it's listed at >$50

>>4128222
speaking of cheap film, I picked up several boxes of cheap stock to test, I might as well start bulk loading to save where I can and Freestyle Photo has a good selection of 100' rolls.

to test:
Fomapan 100
Fomapan 400
Arista edu 100
Arista edu 400
Kentmere 100

>>4128291
>120mm

>>4128331
pretty sure arista is repackaged fomapan fren, not sure about kentmere pretty sure ilford makes it tho.

>>4128288
what developer did you use I actually like the look, gonna cop some 4x5 sheets

>>4128308
My local shop charges the same price for colour as b+w dev and scans LOL

File: DSC_9826-positive.jpg (423 KB, 964x1488)

423 KB JPG

>>4128285
OM is fucked with shutter speed ring placed on the front of the camera. Don't like how they did this.
I would recommend to buy XD11 or X700 if you are looking for a new body. Minolta lenses are great and have good overall condition comparing to more popular brands like canonikon. And this is definitely better than pentaxes IMHO.
>cheap film edition
Not a fan of cheap stocks but if have to choose one, I pick Svema I guess

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Negative Lab Pro v2.2.0
Photographer	SOP610
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	702
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:12:09 16:59:44
Light Source	Unknown
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4128358
>OM is fucked with shutter speed ring placed on the front of the camera. Don't like how they did this.
That's the best feature. It's very ergonomic to change the shutter speed while still looking through the viewfinder.

>>4128377
>That's the best feature. It's very ergonomic to change the shutter speed while still looking through the viewfinder.
??????
You still can do it with your right hand LOL
>ergonomic
no comments

>>4128386
The OM system is the correct design. Everyone else just put it where it would be cheapest and easiest to install.

>>4128387
Okay bro. This is not how UX-design and user expectations works but okay. You should use what fits better to you.

>>4128389
>Your right hand winds the film and presses the shutter release
>You set everything to do with the photo using your left hand - focus, aperture...
>EXCEPT for shutter speed
>because it's cheaper to put that dial for that up top and to the side, closer to the shutter mechanism
>OM system: fixed.
Yes that is how UX works.

OM = premium, well designed
Everyone else = cutting costs because you fags will buy anything

>>4128285
I’ve used the Om system and Pentax-
M system.

At the end of the day the Pentax M system is a cheapened version of their previous lenses (K series) and cameras designed to compete directly with the OM system. They are worse than OM lenses and are basically unusable wide open. Pentax 50mm’s are good stopped down. Everything else in that series is not very good.

People complaining about the ring shutter speed need to appreciate that the ME super has a push button system which is absolutely dreadful: the meter is very good however.

I would get the best OM lens you can get in your budget and an OM20.

>>4128358
It's not just the body that bothers me, on very rare occasions I find the Minolta 50mm hard to focus. The Zuiko 50mm 1.8 is quite good from what I've seen.
I wanted something like the OM-4 because of the meter, I haven't had much luck with Minolta light meters.
>>4128400
Not worried about budget, I've got about 300 euro to spend on gear. Though I don't want to spend it all on just a body.
I've given up on the Pentax ME Super.
Gonna compare the XD11 with the OM-4 to see if it's worth migrating systems over. Probably not.
>>4128392
You've clearly never touched a Minolta camera.

>>4128339
Gonna ask the lab guy next time I bring film over, they use a develop & scan machine.
If you want, contact me over discord so I don't lose you in the thread.
RitalinDrow#1993

>>4128402
>I find the Minolta 50mm hard to focus. The Zuiko 50mm 1.8 is quite good from what I've seen.
Because you are compering 1.4 and 1.8 lenses lol

>>4128285
never used a Pen, but i can garantee you that the OM system is nice to use
havign the shutter ring on the lens mount is weird as first but you get used to it really fast (and it feel like messing with a small cubic MF SLR like those mamiyas)
be careful depending on what model you chose, those are old and can have fuck ups or downsides
>OM1/OM2 : prism oxyding can sometimes shut still the exposure needle
>OM4 : the classic one has a heavy battery drain, the "ti" version correct it
for a first time user the other anon is right, get a OM20 and then you'll upgrade the body, because those small shit can get pricey really quick

>>4128331
not sure what qualifies as cheap for you but
>no agfa apx 100
>no rollei retro 400s

>>4128402
To be honest; I think migrating systems is not particularly necessary if you have to re-buy all of your lenses again. I swapped from Pentax M to Nikon F because the lenses were genuinely better.

There’s a guy that shoots both OM and Minolta, Philip Reeve. So it may be useful to compare.

> https://phillipreeve.net/blog/lenses/all-lens-reviews/

File: 3E4839F2-52BF-47D0-8382-6(...).jpg (70 KB, 1000x1000)

70 KB JPG

>shot BW film
>didn't shoot a half naked woman smoking a cig and propping her tits out on a 4 post bed next to an open window
>shot 800t
>didn't have to shoot a gas station or theater marquee
I think I won, guys

>>4128452
Im deleting your instagram account right now

>>4128452
>tfw never gonna capture the beautiful highlight fall off from natural light going across a womans perky breast on tri x
whats the point anymore

Now that we are gearfagging. Rec me a 50mm lens on M42 mount that is not stupidly expensive. I have a Yashica DX but it has some haze.

>>4128539
Takumar.

>>4128315
How did you get no motion blur on the plane like that?

>>4128557
Plane was already preparing to land so it wasn't traveling that fast.

>>4128557
shutter speed slightly faster than molasses

File: 0b277161-f1f0-4559-8d13-e(...).jpg (54 KB, 540x423)

54 KB JPG

Do any of you take any precautions when shooting outside during rain or snow? Or just simply forgo it and stay inside for the day?

File: KC35KGSYD2201.jpg (2.59 MB, 2000x1320)

2.59 MB JPG

Time for hangover vision Hexanon adventures, internal reflections edition.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 19:17:08
Image Width	10176
Image Height	6744

>>4128561
I really wanted to take a landscape at the top of a nearby hill once when it was overcast as fuck but sometimes sun would peak through.
Halfway through walking to the spot it started raining again but I just went the rest of the way anyway and took the picture.
Probably wouldn't do it if it was pissing it down but light rain is fine.
Snow seems like a complete non-factor unless you live in the arctic circle or something.
I'd be more worried about condensation in the lens when you go back inside

To actually answer your question, probably the latter unless I was already outside in which case I'd just be careful or put the camera away if it's heavy rain

File: KC35KGSYD2203.jpg (2.63 MB, 1322x2000)

2.63 MB JPG

>>4128564

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 19:21:08
Image Width	6744
Image Height	10176

File: KC35KGSYD2204.jpg (2.61 MB, 1323x2000)

2.61 MB JPG

>>4128566

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 19:40:51
Image Width	6744
Image Height	10176

File: KC35KGSYD2205.jpg (2.79 MB, 2000x1309)

2.79 MB JPG

>>4128567

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 19:48:51
Image Width	10224
Image Height	6744

>>4128564
>>4128566
>>4128567
>>4128568

Cool colours anon, very fluffy looking. Overcast day? Also what did you shoot this on?

>>4128567
if there weren't any tire tracks this one would be based

File: KC35KGSYD2221.jpg (2.84 MB, 1333x2000)

2.84 MB JPG

>>4128571
Shot on Gold with C35 EF. The lens is very bloomy especially at wide apertures, which is what the camera ends up selecting most of the time because of its limited shutter speeds.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 20:08:14
Image Width	6768
Image Height	10080

File: 1649766795968.jpg (4.55 MB, 3089x2048)

4.55 MB JPG

got a roll back today

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 15:42:36
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: 1659663840090.jpg (4.74 MB, 3089x2048)

4.74 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 15:43:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: 1672272156641.jpg (4.98 MB, 3089x2048)

4.98 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 15:43:52
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: Roll3_018.jpg (1.39 MB, 3000x1988)

1.39 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 13:39:21
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1988

File: 1671899749390.jpg (4.05 MB, 3089x2048)

4.05 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 15:44:23
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: 1652023240289.jpg (4.87 MB, 3089x2048)

4.87 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 7.41.004 (211021)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 15:44:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3089
Image Height	2048

File: Ariana100_at_1600_002.jpg (573 KB, 800x1200)

573 KB JPG

>>4128288
You're doing something very wrong to get that much contrast from fomapan 100. Those blown highlights and crushed blacks looks like the result of bad scanning.

Pic related is fomapan 100 pushed to 1600 and I have more Shadow detail than you.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: KC35KGSYD2224.jpg (2.8 MB, 2000x1303)

2.8 MB JPG

A few more shits unto the breech

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 20:28:21
Image Width	10224
Image Height	6744

File: KC35KGSYD2225.jpg (2.72 MB, 1307x2000)

2.72 MB JPG

>>4128601

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 20:33:13
Image Width	6768
Image Height	10248

File: KC35KGSYD2226.jpg (2.1 MB, 1335x2000)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4128602

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 20:38:10
Image Width	6768
Image Height	10152

File: KC35KGSYD2227.jpg (2.59 MB, 1346x2000)

2.59 MB JPG

>>4128603

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 20:42:39
Image Width	6816
Image Height	10056

File: KC35KGSYD2229.jpg (2.93 MB, 1327x2000)

2.93 MB JPG

>>4128604

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 21:00:26
Image Width	6792
Image Height	10176

>>4128600
based foma 100 pusher
ive only pushed to 800 before, what dev do you use? 1600 looks pretty cool

File: 114af14908e548d41a3bec3e4(...).jpg (295 KB, 1242x1543)

295 KB JPG

>>4128567
>>4128568
absolutely dreamy

>>4128588
cool shot, crop it a little

>>4128593
i see your attempt at framing but it was foiled by a pretty boring subject. you have the right idea, keep shooting

>>4128605
cute and comfy

File: 1667341689152.jpg (1.62 MB, 2048x1358)

1.62 MB JPG

>>4128623
thanks for the feedback fren

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 20:28:02
Color Space Information	sRGB

i want to stop paying to get my film scanned. what film scanner should i buy? under $300 preferrably.

>>4128635
Espon v600 or v500 are all below 300 in ebay if you're in the US

>>4128635
>>4128645
they also hold their value very well so if you wanna sell it you wont lose any money

File: 1674293556665.jpg (944 KB, 2048x1358)

944 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:23 20:28:06
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4128645
>>4128647
ok. the v600 is the one i've been eyeballing. thanks.

>>4128315
damn theseare some nice colors. what was this scanned on? it doest say in the exif

File: Roll2_009.jpg (1.71 MB, 3000x1999)

1.71 MB JPG

>>4128660
I think the lab I sent these to used a Pakon F-135 Plus.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Adobe Systems Inc.
Camera Model	Tiff File
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 13:37:44
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1999

>>4128222
your favorite film with iso < 100
your favorite film with iso > 800

>>4128723
i just push foma 100 according to my needs

File: Roll1_004.jpg (2.2 MB, 3000x1988)

2.2 MB JPG

>>4128723
I nut my pants when I shoot Velvia 50

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 13:35:46
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1988

>>4128723
Delta 3200 pulled 6 stops
Fp4 shot through a 2 stop nd pushed 6 stops

Night photography on film is a meme right

Like how do you expose anything if there's no light outside

>>4128758
It’s called a tripod.

File: asdq2x.jpg (933 KB, 2016x2600)

933 KB JPG

Do you guys feel superhypermegaultra inflation of film price? will it ever goes down ?

>>4128758
Tripod + cable release + the appropriate reciprocity factor if shooting black and white
Yeah it's a meme if it's literally pitch black but you can still do night stuff if the moon is out or you shoot fuel stations or whatever

>>4128725
why does the grain make everything look bumpy?

>>4128774
I shoot black and white so it hurts a bit less, only colour roll I've shot was a gold 200 roll last november/december and that was £8 for a 24 exp roll, now it's more like 10 or 12 if you can even find some.
I don't know how some people do it when colour can easily cost >£16 for "budget" stocks or worse if it's something discontinued or just higher quality
I've heard people mention that the price of film is just normalising to what it used to be during peak film days but that seems like bullshit.
Idk if kodak is willingly underproducing or not, maybe they see investing into further production capacity too much of a risk because they worry the current popularity trend will crash?

File: Screenshot_20230123-19590(...).jpg (181 KB, 1080x2355)

181 KB JPG

>why yes, m'lady, I do use a 1:400 rodinal dilution 4 hour stand dev for my Acros II, can you tell by the contrast?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android SP1A.210812.016.G781U1UES9EVL1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	2355
Image Orientation	Unknown

>>4128782
how do you keep a consistent temperature for that long?

>>4128783
wrap it in a cozy little blanket

>>4128783
sous vide

>>4128758
Shoot Delta 3200 and at f1.2 like I do

File: p645.png (246 KB, 483x476)

246 KB PNG

How the fuck do I open this? Is there some tool that fits into the two holes that I can rotate out?

>>4128782
minimum quantity of developer is 5 mg.

>>4128806
dividing compass

>>4128806
>Is there some tool that fits into the two holes
yes, jewelry callipers that watch/camera repair guys would have had in 1981. this >>4128817 will work just as well.

File: Eastman-5222-2.jpg (1.91 MB, 4832x3221)

1.91 MB JPG

Sandia Crest, NM

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:20 01:30:24
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Eastman-5222-9.jpg (1.65 MB, 3181x4770)

1.65 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:20 01:30:30
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Eastman-5222-9.jpg (1.74 MB, 3236x4852)

1.74 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:20 00:32:24
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Eastman-5222-21.jpg (1.79 MB, 4811x3208)

1.79 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:20 00:32:41
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Eastman-5222-24.jpg (2.27 MB, 4839x3226)

2.27 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:20 00:32:41
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Eastman-5222-8.jpg (2.18 MB, 4876x3252)

2.18 MB JPG

My dev recipe:

8mL HC-110 + 10mL Rodinal

Add to make 1L working solution.

16:30mins ~68F

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:20 00:32:29
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4128723
>cinestill 50d
>cinestill 800t pushed +1
and
>Rollei RPX25
>TriX + 2

>>4128723
>your favorite film with iso < 100
ilford pan f
>your favorite film with iso > 800
ilford delta 400 pull to 1000 iso

>>4128781
I remember buying Agfa colour from Poundland 30 rolls at a time for £1 each back in 2016. Would never shoot colour negs at the current prices

>>4128782
do you like that app?

File: 4RINC8I.jpg (230 KB, 1000x1000)

230 KB JPG

>>4128609
Hc110 for two hours with 10s agitation at the 1 hour mark. Can't remember the dilution.

>>4128725
Velvia 50 is sick but that scan needs some serious colour correcting

File: E96BD9AE-B186-4499-8AD6-8(...).jpg (104 KB, 640x480)

104 KB JPG

>talk a bit with the local retired photographer
>he said his friend gave him a bit of b&w chemistry thats expired
>tell me to drop by next week to gift it to me
I was thinking the lad had like a bottle of rodinal and a bottle of fix
>turn out its full bottles of ilfosol 3, full bottles of fixer, and full bottles of multigrade, and all unsealed
Absolute madman
Bless this man and bless this earth, life is worth living lads

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone SE (2nd generation)
Camera Software	16.1.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:24 13:57:43
Exposure Time	1/56 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	320
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	1.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	640
Image Height	480
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4128813
No it isn't, that's just superstition. I do 3ml of rodinal often no problem.

>>4128897
I do! it's got timers for each step and a little animated tank that rotates when it's time for agitations. you can customize almost each step or timer as well as your agitation scheme such as for the first 60 seconds and then for 10 seconds each minute. you can set your default film size and parameter settings ex. 35mm and I only do 1 roll at a time so I only need 300ml of each mixture but if the dilution is a little wonky and I get 11.7ml+288.3ml I'll change the final mixture to 310ml and it works out easier

recommend if just for the timers

File: AA015.jpg (554 KB, 2205x1470)

554 KB JPG

>bright edges on the pic

is this a scanning error on the lab's part? everything online tells me this is either scanning or dev error but the other pics don't all have this white vignette effect on them. or did i somehow fuck up? I know for a fact it isnt a light leak in the camera because later rolls I've put thru it didn't have this come up hardly at all

is it on all the roll or just this one picture ?

Alright,since my scanner at home doesn't work properly, I'll let a store scan my 3mm b/w film.
What resolution is sufficient enough? They offer the following:
>2,02 MP
>3,4 MP
>8,4 MP

>>4128953
>3mm
35 mm, sorry

>>4128952
on different rolls they're on different pics, which made me believe it was scanner error. surely a development issue would fuck most of (if not all of) the roll right?

>>4128953
>3mm
Microfilm?
I wanna get into miniature formats, where do i start?

>>4128953
35mm contains about as much detail as a 12 to 24mp digital image. But slightly worse because film never lays perfectly flat.

>>4128967
>12 to 24mp image
cms 20 ii begs to disagree

>>4128969
Based.
>reminder there's retards here who think human vision is in the same ballpark as CMS 20 II in terms of resolution

>>4128962
That's not what microfilm is, microfilm is just film with extremely fine grain. CMS 20 II and Rollei Copex Rapid are both microfilms. 3mm is a subminiature format.

>>4128831
no argument from me, it looks good. you have sharpness, punchy contrast, and pleasant looking but prominent grain. What made you decide on this dev method?

>>4128992
Microfilm is also used in small formats to amp up the resolution to make them actually viable, so what is your point, homersexual?

>>4128831
thanks but how does it differ from just rodinal?
why you choose to add hc110 to the mix?

>>4128645
flatbed scanning kind of makes me want to an hero tbqh. Only reason I have one and put up with it is because I got an Epson for $20.

Personally I'm considering paying more for one of those pacific image scanners for 35mm. Some of them advance automatically, too.

File: smug fat lips pepe arms c(...).png (328 KB, 800x778)

328 KB PNG

>>4128774
>tfw I have a freezer door full of Superia I stocked up on using 40% off coupons

>>4129132
Scanning in general is enough for me to abandon 35mm entirely. At least with 645 slides I already have a good sized picture in my hand and can enjoy it that way.

One day i'll bother to get a macro lens despite having almost no interest in macro just for scanning film. Pretty sure it'll be sharper than any scanner you could buy for the cost of said lens.

>>4128588
>>4128590
crispy
what film?

File: IMG_20180116_204213.jpg (25 KB, 326x452)

25 KB JPG

Has anyone of you ever submitted photos to contests or magazines? Ever win or get published?

File: 000058.jpg (3.75 MB, 5215x3511)

3.75 MB JPG

>>4129181
just submitted mine, curious
very local contest my lab is hosting

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP500
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:03:17 11:34:11
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5350
Image Height	3602

>>4129181
I've won /r/analog weekly like 6 times AMA

>>4128339
Yo I think I ignored your discord request by accident

>>4129190
lol oops

anyone have any experience with Mitsubishi film?

I got a guy (my grandpa) who has a ziplock full of it stashed in his freezer. Apparently my grandma stocked up on it when they stopped manufacturing it and the store she bought it from was trying to clear out old stock.

Can't find much about it online, much less examples. Honestly don't even know if this stuff will be good since it expired in like 97

>>4129307
Easiest way to find out is to take a roll out and shoot it and see how it is

>>4129181
I submitted a photo ages ages ago (digital) and won second place at a very very small gallery. Now I'm preparing to submit some to a much bigger festival that's coming up soon, will be shot on film

>>4129307
both naming convention and apparent corporate connections suggest that it is a variant of the Konica films of similar ISO.

negative film stored in freezer from 97 should be fine (let it mellow at room temp for an hour before loading). Recommend shooting part or all of a roll at box speed and developing it and then see if you need to adjust more than that for later rolls.
the much vaunted "1 stop per decade rule" is hipster trash
here are more useful axioms:
1. usually storage conditions (cold/dry/dark) matter more than age
2. age reduces sensitivity (iso)
3. age reduces sensitivity of faster >250-400 iso films much more quickly
4. black and white ages better than color of equivalent iso
5. general best practice is to shoot some of the film at box speed, see how fogged it is, and then to over expose the next roll 1.5 stops and have the film pulled in development.
This is crucial because you are trying to build density on the negative that outpaces the fog's impact on the image. Ergo more exposure, less development

Wild card: if it's slide film, shoot box speed and see if it's shit, if it's shit you have to get way creative with overexposure, under development of the first developer + benzotriazole then normal development for later steps. slide film is much more complicated for this

>need to do 10 rolls of colour to make home development viable
What the fuck, it’s very hard to get chems even at that price

>>4128593
beautiful shot

>>4128291
what the hell is 12-exp?
my lab doesn't differentiate between 23-exp and 36-exp unfortunately, but meh, its only a few dollars

File: mori film lab.png (67 KB, 863x854)

67 KB PNG

>>4128291
This is what I pay in my hip lab in Brussels. All scans are done on a fuji Frontier at high res. 48 hour turnaround time. I also have a crush on the girl at the counter so going there is nice

>>4129464
kek what a scam

>>4129414
IIRC you occasionally find 35mm found as 12exp as samplers

>>4129478
how is that a scam

I have a photography tutorial book from 1997 at home and obviously everything in it is shot on film, a mixture of 35mm and MF. What gets me is that the photos in it look very clean, documentative and similar to digital photos. Like realistically there is very little difference in quality at this level of enlargement and in print.

What I am curious about is why film photos taken currently look a lot more ‘filmy’ than those taken at the peak of film usage? They seem much more grainy, the colours are usually quite off. And they just look like film more. Am I the only person that notices this?

>>4129487
not that person, it's a pretty decent price actually but charging extra for pushing or pulling is wack. my lab (which I only use for C41) lets you pull or push for free and it's 6 eur for both B&W and C41 in formats from 135, 120 and 4x5.

>>4129517
because self taught ig tards suck dick. my 35mm looks equivalent to modern full frame with a good scan. if u use good gear and know what ur doing u can get excellent results on film.

>>4129517
Probably the used an actual enlarger to work with negatives or a good scanner.

But also
>>4129529
retards don't know how to expose properly and most labs nowadays also don't know how to develop properly.

>>4129517
As in pretty much any artistic medium, people have been trying to reach technical perfection. For photography it's sharp image, realistic colors, no grain, high resolution. That's what film and film camerashave been aiming towards for decades, and that trend continued on with digital cameras. But as always, once you have reach technical perfection, it becomes boring for artists and many depart from it for artistic purposes. For exemple with painting, after aiming towards photorealism for literally century and through different movements, painters started going more abstract, especially as photography progressed, because technical perfection had been reached and they needed something new to bring to the table.
The sort answer is: back then photographers wanted technical perfection. Now that perfection is available for the price of cheap compact camera or smartphone, people are looking specifically for that imperfect film look.

File: AA034A.jpg (1.67 MB, 2205x1470)

1.67 MB JPG

>>4129543
fucking this

I personally started shooting it just so I could get more grainy and glowing looks, Never plan on being a pro artist or giving a shit what people think of my work, but it feels nice deviating from the pics I took on digital when I first started shooting. plus the entire process of shooting was made "imperfect" because I went from firing off 3 bracketed shots on digital and checking the exp every time to just shooting once and forgetting it (save for when I'm trying new stocks out)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 6.0 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2022:11:19 16:09:20
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4128222
cheap film is only like a dollar less than expensive film just use whatever dude who cares

>>4129549
Film looks like how a memory feels is the only way I can describe it

>>4129601
You haven't seen the price of Portra, have you?
>>4129616
This also, but for me its about B&W. Its harder to actually pinpoint the time that the photo was taken so it feels more like a distant memory even if it was taken last week.

File: 1674670129504.png (10 KB, 500x500)

10 KB PNG

havent even shot even one roll of 5222 yet and im already missing foma

File: positif-18.jpg (1.62 MB, 4510x6379)

1.62 MB JPG

self scanning is fun, but i should edit the pictures during daylight because my screen is too dim at night
>blah blah blah qulity
it's a 35mm frame scanned on a V600, and my first scan. i didn't have better option for scanning that formal AND 120 under 250 bucks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:22 18:31:42
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4129632
Not bad, desu. If you are using vuescan try using 2 passes, it improves a bit.

>>4129643
it was using epson scan 2 lol
also i tried to use silverfast 8 but fucker keep crashing when i do multiple exposures
any tips to clean properly the scanning screen ? (look at the streak on her face)

>>4129678
>look at the streak on her face
Looks more like the film isnt completely flat or something

I recently found an unshot, expired roll of Kodak Max 400 that my grandfather estimated he had purchased 25 years ago. It was stored at room temperature during that time.

Would it be worth shooting? If so, any guesses on the effectice ISO I should shoot with?

>>4129733
>kodak max
what kind? ultramax? tmax?
if its color negative film, shoot it at 50 or 100 iso. black and white is more stable, go for 200 iso.

>>4129733
50/50 the scans come out like total dogshit

>>4129734
The roll just says "MAX 400" on it but elsewhere on the roll it says it's a color negative film so I guess it's Ultramax. Thanks for the ISO recommendation

>>4129737
I like those odds

>>4129630
i just bought 2x 100ft rolls of 5222. you wont be disappointed

File: 500410C1-B872-4730-BFE3-E(...).jpg (288 KB, 1125x865)

288 KB JPG

I hope you’re doing well Dean

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1125
Image Height	2436
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Screenshot_20230125_210528.jpg (649 KB, 1079x2903)

649 KB JPG

worth it bros? still cheaper than Portra....

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android SP1A.210812.016.G781U1UES9EVL1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1079
Image Height	2903

>>4129733
read
>>4129368
one stop per decade is bullshit. recommend shooting at 150 iso and pulling 1.5 stop in development.
>>4129464
ask her out
>>4129540
this

>>4129616
love when film has this permanent yet dreamy vibe. one of the reasons i like the slightly inaccurate colors of expired slide film
>>4129623
love when you think the photo could be old or timeless and you have to search for "too new" things in the image to tip you off.

>>4129805
>worth it bros?
probably not but maybe

File: 1674713430484.png (376 KB, 1478x499)

376 KB PNG

I HATE THE ANTICHRIST

>>4129825
wtf I literally saw some Hawaiian store sell provia for 19$ a roll

>>4129825
redpill me on slide film - isn't it just positive-negatives for 2x the price?

>>4129832
It has less dynamic range but you can look at it and appreciate the photo in 35mm/6x7 or put it in a slide projector

>>4129740
Yeah its from before they branded it ultramax, so its at least 25 years old

File: slides to vhs.jpg (338 KB, 1600x1600)

338 KB JPG

>>4129832
Pros:
-Inherently stronger contrast
-usually higher resolving power than negative (not always)
-much more saturated
-more permanent because of different type of dyes
-viewable by eye or through projection
-theoretically better for camera scanning
Cons:
-much smaller dynamic range than negative (usually 5-4 stops)
-harder to shoot and meter for (can't just use scene average 18% grey)
-less tolerant of development fuckups and storage related issues
-can no longer print fully analog (used to be possible either by kodak positive print or Cibachrome--although it is theoretically still possible by way of inter-negative, RA4 reversal printing, or by making color separations) i.e. you need to scan and then print digitally which is lame. Ironically back in the day slide was preferred for magazines because no print had to be made and tweaked, color separations were made directly and then printed.
-usually more expensive
-harder to find and harder to find places that develop and do so well.

Both have their use cases. Many here remember the slide film look from Textbooks and Magazines of yesteryear and their intense colors and dark blacks and see it as a big part of the "film look"

>pic somewhat related, imagine that boomers copied their kodachromes to vhs and probably chucked them.
There was an article that came out recently where some guy bragged about storing his grandfathers film so poorly that he was part of the artwork in having altered the images by destroying them, same energy.

I want to shoot an event this weekend but the high temperature will be in the mid-20s F. Is that too low to take a 35mm out to use?

>>4129997
Depends of your shutter type.

>>4130013
It's a Minolta x700.

>>4130030
You can shoot that shit at -25C and it'll be fine. Just watch for condensation, let that bitch settle into the temp.

>>4130031
>let that bitch settle into the temp.
How exactly do I do that? Is that the same as this other tip I saw about putting the camera in a ziploc before coming back inside so it doesn't condense so much after a sudden rise in temp?

>>4130033
imma guess you're shooting outside and then leaving in a car? if the car is parked outside and gets to a similar temp inside as out, then while you're leaving the heater will warm the inside of the car gradually enough to avoid condensation (unless it's like a brand new lexus or something that heats up quick.) Honestly anything above 20f i wouldn't worry about just taking right inside unless it's like some high 70s apartment. In which case yeah google the bag method way lol.

File: Screenshot_20230126_174136.jpg (1.16 MB, 1079x1434)

1.16 MB JPG

getting prepped for the weekend, bros
first time shooting Acros II, any tips?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android SP1A.210812.016.G781U1UES9EVL1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1079
Image Height	1434

>>4130307
Yes.
Don't, shoot HP5.

>>4130307
keep your development strategy in mind. Over expose a 1/3rd stop or more if using rodinal.

>>4130325
> Over expose a 1/3rd stop or more if using rodinal.
oh shoot, that's what I use! what's the reason for overexposing with rodinal?

File: Screenshot_20230126_195831.jpg (1.19 MB, 1080x2400)

1.19 MB JPG

>>4130313
I shot hp5 my last roll, I want to try something new and this what I have in the que + the Acros that's loaded

>>4130343
Where do yyou even go out to find interesting subjects to shoot so much film, I live in a big ass city and it's still hard to complete a full roll across a few weekends

>>4130346
git gud at google maps street view

>>4130346
that Olympus is my edc and I take it with me wherever I go so I'm constantly snapping with that
I have a SLR I take for trips or use mainly on weekends when I have time to plan out my equipment or just take it all and use whatever feels good when I'm at my destination
so that's 2 cameras I'm running film through at any time but along the lines of >>4130362 I search Google maps and look for interesting areas and hope there's a brewery around for extra reasons to visit and hit the road + home dev means more films to test

Does anyone have any good tips for Patterson reel use? Mine literally always bind up about 1/3 way through loading the roll.

>>4130416
throw it away and get another one.
alternatively try boiling it, i know it sounds weird but i bought one second hand that was bent like a fucking banana, boiling it for like 10 minutes straightened it right out and it also gave it the best clean ever.
im thinking your might have warped for some reason, or it needs a deep clean, and boiling it will do both.

ofc stir it around constantly so it doesnt sit against the bottom of the pot where temps might exceed those of boiling water.

scored an excellent grade pentax program plus (program a for non yanks) from keh. not having a shutter dial is a little weird but I'm so used to metering for shadows then recomposing that the compensation dial will be the biggest learning curve

>>4129787
neat, i bough a few rolls from some guy on the internet to try it out
any tippos for developing 5222 in rodinal?
not too keen on trying other developers rn

File: Pentax_K1000_1__92882.jpg (217 KB, 1280x836)

217 KB JPG

I have an Ashai Pentax k1000. I've never shot on a film camera, and I've never tried photography in general. How do I into using this thing?
What sort of film should I get?
How do I know which shutter speed I should use?
There are two rings on the lens. One of them is for adjusting the focus, what is the other one for?
What general things should I be aware of?
etc.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4130489
>How do I into using this thing?
Watch a video, on how to load and basic operation. Its not rocket science but its a good idea to familiarize with your specific camera before using it.
>What sort of film should I get?
The prices of color film are fucked right now, so for a first try the cheapest black and white that you can find. Fomapan is a favorite of the thread. Mind that film has "speed" meaning that they are faster or slower to capture the light they are exposed too. Fomapan is usally ISO 100 so it would work great on exteriors, but not so great in dim light interiors (Unless you have a flash)
>How do I know which shutter speed I should use?
>There are two rings on the lens. One of them is for adjusting the focus, what is the other one for?
Learn about the triangle of exposition, sunny 16 or look for a light meter app for your phone. The shutter speed is going to affect how long you expose your film, so it depends of the circumstances. The other ring is for the aperture, move it and you can see a circle on the lens getting bigger or smaller, that also determines how much light its going to enter your film.
>What general things should I be aware of?
Try to locate a film lab that has fair prices in your area, you can look into selfdev if you like it but please make sure that you actually enjoy it.
Have fun, fucking up things its part of the experience so don't feel discouraged if you don't make great photos at the beginning, keep researching.

>>4130489
a fellow pentaxbro! great camera to start with since it's full manual so you'll learn how to take photos instead of letting the camera set the exposure. it does use batteries but only for the light meter, you can use an external light meter if you don't trust the meter in the camera but I found the K1000 I had to be pretty good.

last advice -. assuming you're not doing home dev so get your film developed by an actual photo lab and not CVS/Walmart/etc. the difference in quality will make you want to keep shooting and improving.

good luck and have fun.

>>4128831
>>4128829
>>4128828
>>4128827
>>4128826
ty for sharing anon, that hillside one looks very dreamlike.
Newspaper one is pretty cool as well, real crunchy texture
What did you actually shoot with? I assume a kodak bw judging by the filenames

>>4128913
I'd love to find out if there are any people with old film gear/chemicals near me they'd be happy donating/selling cheap
Nice find anon, how many rolls do you think that's worth?

>>4130339
Rodinal loses shadow detail at about that rate (1/3 [usually] to 2/3 stop [faster films]). Tends to be a feature of concentrated one shot developers.
Sometimes people call it a "speed losing developer" but that sounds unnecessarily harsh. I've seen great results with acros+ rodinal both stand and regular development. Check Filmdev.org.

>>4130451
I've done 1+50 and pulled it to 125 in rodinal with really nice results. Wouldn't recommend too much agitation because it makes the grain worse (coarser) and the film and dev combo is already contrasty. Try 1+25 if you want more contrast. Recommend overexposing a bit as mentioned above. Also check fixing time on the film leader (drop one drop of mixed fixer on leader in light, see how long it takes to go translucent, double that time for fixing time of film) because sometimes high silver content films will under fix.

If I'm gonna shoot outside when it's snowing, is it true that I should crank the shutter speed high or low so the neg won't end up just a mess of white motion blur streaks?

>>4130637
I remember reading somewhere that you need to compensate for the snow by like 2 stops over-exposure otherwise you end up with murky grey snow.
Idk how true that is but if you are shooting in active snowfall, anything faster than 1/60 would work I assume unless the snow is falling very fast.
Maybe compensate with aperture instead if you're worried about streaks, most likely not going to see very far in heavy snowfall anyhow.

File: IMG_20230127_224633_159.jpg (145 KB, 889x1280)

145 KB JPG

Pushed ProImage 100 to 800 because it was all I had.

Everything went better than expected.

File: IMG_20230127_224659_052.jpg (169 KB, 853x1280)

169 KB JPG

>>4130654

File: IMG_20230127_160118_681.jpg (488 KB, 1200x554)

488 KB JPG

Gonna go out tonight to test this thing.
Seems to be working fine except the led that says if you need to use the flash.

>>4128222

Hi filmbros. Can anyone tell me how those instax printers work? Thanks

>>4130664
Is this specifically to test for non-daylight hours? Interested to see how it holds up in the dark

>>4130672
Prints digital photo to film that's used in instax minies.

>>4130672
>>4130716
You can also connect directly to some fuji cameras. It works with my x-e3

>>4130672
I have one with me rn, it's a SP-3
You can either send photos from your phone or from your Fuji camera or from your phone and have it print within about 20 seconds.

Shoot me more questions and I'll try to answer them.

>>4130683
>Is this specifically to test for non-daylight hours? Interested to see how it holds up in the dark
Yep, it works okay on daylight (Considering that is a point and shoot from the 70s)
I loaded with some Arista 400 since its the higher it goes
Ended using flash a lot, so gonna develop it tomorrow and see how it did it

>>4130516
>>4130535
Thanks for the info. I'm going on a ski trip soon, and I kind of want to bring the camera, but I'm afraid of falling on it. Does anyone have suggestions for carrying while skiing? I guess I could just bring it for just one day and only hit mellower runs.

>>4130767
lol you'll break your ribs smashing into a tree if that's on your neck before that tank will, just stick it in a backpack until you need it. and see
>>4130637
>>4130641
shooting in snow is tricky

>>4130780
got any generic tips for snow or is it just a case of shoot and find out? I did some shooting with gold in december while the snow was still fresh, I just did the +2 stops over-exposure compensation.

File: KARSCMS2DEC2227.jpg (1.53 MB, 2000x1308)

1.53 MB JPG

>>4130780
>shooting in snow is tricky
>tricky
>set meter to +1.5/2
>get perfect results every time
The only slightly tricky part is color balancing because snow's actual color on the film varies depending on conditions which you can't see in situ because your brain shoops it on the fly.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2022:12:19 19:37:04
Image Width	10233
Image Height	6745