I think picrel would suit me just fine.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 6_2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.0.1 (Macintosh)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern920Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:11:23 11:21:43Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length45.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4126192Your arms would break off mounting the thing.
>>4126223What are you talking about? You can shoot that thing handheld and get good photos.
I am but a simple man
>>4126268using these will become a thoughtcrime shortly
>>4127537>doing an action>thoughtcrime
At the moment it's my dream lens as I'm using a KA-mount body
>>4126268>walking with semi automatic rifle in public perfectly legal and accepted, cops congratulate on your fine citizenship>putting a stock handle on your camera to shoot action is a thoughtcrime and cops shoot you on site, question laterOnly in Amerricca!
>>4127716Tamron SP AF 90/2.8 Macro (72E) or (172E)Thank me later
i've been considering getting a gx680 for studio work (with all lenses), but with a digital back too.
This would be useful for portraits.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4127734that would be awesome, I wanted one of these too but for walking around i settled with a Bronica instead, gx680 seems very impressive
>>4126192>Imagine not owning your dream cameras
like you would take that with you
>>4128833edc is the antithesis of good photography
>>4128824>imagine not owning a thing that hasn't been released yetnice b8 m8
>>4126192Something FF or MF with good enough global shutter to be equivalent to mechanical, and a curved sensor so all lenses are smaller and lighterI guess I'll be able to buy it in 2035
>>4126192Just thinking how many rents this would cost me
>>4128893What the fuck is that hinged lens-thing
>>4128895Flip lens for macro
>>4126192[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiImage Width1501Image Height1284
>>4126192
>>4126223weakling detected
>>4128811This is a gearfag wetdream. Those 80s/90s style brutal design on the lens the big chungus of the body, I wouldn't use it but would take it for a walk on weekends and put it on display.Would use a visibility jacket so people think I'm some kind of surveyor
18-400mm zoom lens with f/1.4 constant aperture, no distortion or chromatic aberrations, 500g maximum weight
>>4126192Cheap film and a lab within walking distance.
>>4129430>cheap filmthis thread is for realistic setups that actually exist
>>4129083I want that lens on a 645z, and mounted on one of these. I'd use it for street photography.
Love me some top down action[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1082Image Height1080Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4129334At that point make it a 8-1000mm f/0.95 tilt shift lens so you don't ever need anything else, ever
>>4128850>digital lol at your life
>>4126192I just want a full functional dark room and the time to use it.
>>4126192Leica M10 Monochrom with a 35mm Summilux Pre-asph
>>4129334I wonder if something like that is even theoretically possible like with some scifi futuristic materials
>>4129980Parts of it exist, most sports broadcast setups have them
>>4130004I mainly meant the less then 500g part, that's where some fancy new materials science tech might be needed if it's even physically possible at all
>>4130099I’m a material scientist IRL, the only weight loss you can get is by Fresnel optic elements but newer lens designs increase in element count and weight because more demand in resolving power
>>4127728my 272E has chronic asthma, it goes WHIIIRRRR WHIIIIIRRRRRRR
