Let’s say I’ve got an iso 8 film in my camera but it’s night time . Can I just change the iso Setting? How much can you change the iso on ,say 100 iso . Are some films more flexible than others with their iso[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 6sCamera Software15.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)49 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:08:05 20:39:26Exposure Time1/24 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.2Brightness0.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.15 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio1.7Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4100008Slide film - you can try to push it a stop. Maybe two, and that's only ISO 32. And it'll look pretty bad.Negative film - you could try to push it like 3 stops, maybe. ISO 64.You won't be able to push this to a speed fast enough to hand hold, so you may as well put it on a tripod and not push the film at all.
>>4100009I’m going to take some night pictures at iso 8 . How does this make you feel ?
>>4100008No, you can’t just adjust the iso setting. You can, however, underexpose or overexpose above what the meter says and then push or pull development later. The result is similar to digital. You get more grain and less detail in shadows. Print film actually benefits from overexposure somewhat, and I usually shoot at about 2/3 stop or one full stop above box speed.
>>4100024I dont know about that other guy but I get mad as fuck when people waste resources. get raped
>>4100026>you can't just adjust the iso setting>you wouldnt download a carhe CAN just adjust the iso setting. In fact if he's going to push/pull Its literally how you push or pull film correctly and still be able to meter the shot with your camerathe mitigating factor is is the stock of film being used and how much latitude that particular film has. As the other anon hinted at, something like Provia 100 is going to have a lot less latitude than Ilford delta 400 or cinestill 800. The big issue is finding labs that can push/pull the film.That said, OP should just get a tripod and do a long exposure and stop being retarded
>>4100088No? That’s not adjusting the iso setting, that’s pushing and pulling.
>>4100017>>4100026>>4100088>>4100102you all seem to have missed that OP wants to mix box speed and "pushed" shots on the same roll.>>4100008Yes, you could set your meter to say 32 and push afterwards. But your iso 8 shots will be very dense and will have funky contrast and probably blown highlights. Practically, you absolutely should not attempt to shoot your film at anything above 8. Film that slow is almost always also super high contrast and doesn't tolerate underexposure of any kind. Expect pushing to result in "soot and snow" pictures where there's either no exposure, or fully blown out exposure with almost nothing in between.
Using box speed is the recommended way for predictable results.
As a tourist with a6400, should i get sigma 18-50 2.8 or 56 1.4?
How do I into proper printing?What're the basics I should know for it? Lots of info online for the gear and techniques needed to take the photos but not much for the equipment that you can actually put them to paper with.Just want to create nice photo albums and be able to create stuff I wouldn't be ashamed of framing.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareNegative Lab Pro v2.3.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:11:15 21:41:10Color Space InformationsRGB
I wanted to clean my brand new B+W filter because I have autism.I wet a new microfiber cloth with distilled water, wiped the filter, and wiped it again with a clean dry microfiber cloth. Filter looks clean but if I shine my phone light through the filter I can see streaks and smears. I went ahead and bought B+W lens cleaner spray and pec pads. Do I do the same thing? Spray pec pad, wipe filter, wipe again with dry pec pad?
>>4100207wipe your ass with the pec pad first, then clean the filter.
>>4100208Can you please give me a serious answer. I know dust on the front element or filter won't affect image quality but my autism prevents me from being OK with that.I've tried Zeiss wipes and they always leave streaks or lintI really don't know what to fucking do at this point
>>4100209wet wipe first, then dry wipe with a clean oneI use qtips and isopropyl, myself. If you let it dry by itself it'll develop streaksgood luck anon
cant decide which i should get. any recommendation or tip or comment?
>>4100198unless you plan to spend your holiday taking portraits of people and distant landscapes only then the zoom, no question.
>>4100247Let's be real, that camera is going to be left in the hotel room and their iPhone will handle normal camera duties.
>>4100198i have the a6600 and both lensesdo you have any specific questions
>>4100240Having bought a mirrorless for 155 euro+75 euro, I would say neither they probably are broken and riddled with so many hidden issue that they might as well be recycled at this price.Probably much worse experience than just using your phone.I would expect that both of these will overheat on summer and constantly reset the position of the lens and focus.
>>4100410fuck mani have this issue with all film cams i used before but im tired of wasting so much money so im looking at this cheaper price range
>>4100411Do your lens have a slight seating problem?Try to see which way to screw in the lens, and hold the camera by the lens+corpus in a way that prevents movement of the lens. Obviously the camera has a mechanism that seats the lens in place, but it seemed to reduce the annoyance for me.Never have I had this issue with a camera we bought brand new.
>>4100413sorrywhat i meant with "this issue" is that i buy a used analog camera and it only brings issues and is full of some kind of bullshit/ somehow broken or whatever
>>4100204What are you trying to do, print at home? Just get a photo printer but don’t expect good quality. You’re better off outsourcing your prints because paper and ink still costs $$$.Just remember to set your dpi to 300 when exporting and obviously export the highest resolution possible. Experiment with different papers for the print look you want to achieve. I like to use Whitewall for printing because they carry premium fujifilm papers as well as do glicee and the price and customer service is good. At lot of printers out there dont say exactly what paper they use they’ll just “metallic” or “premium” or their own marketing name for a brand name paper. Ive also made canvas prints from Printique that came out high quality.You can also order prints with watermarks for a significant discount if you just want to save money and test papers.Don’t invest in a home printer until you have lots of experience ordering prints and finding out what you like.
>>4100247True, i guess i just wanted to be hip and get a prime.>>4100249It's actually gonna be Samsung :^)
>>4100416>buy a used analog camera>>4100416>brokeni mean, the dots are there, just connect them
>>4100495i bought my normal cam used and its great. new anolog cams are way too expensive[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2000Image Height1312Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGB
If I use an iso 100 film and slap a k2 filter in front of my lens couldn't i decrease my cameras iso setting to 50 instead of stopping down? I don't want to change the depth of field of the photo.Yes I photographed my photo because my scanner is broken ATM.
>>4100635My dumbass meant increase iso to 200
>>4100635>couldn't i decrease my cameras iso setting to 50 instead of stopping downIf your meter is inside the camera then you don't do either - most meters correctly compensate for a yellow filter.If you set your meter to 50 and take a reading without the filter then whatever it says will be correct with the filter for 100 film. You can of course adjust shutter and aperture to anything that keeps the exposure the same.
>>4100636in that case no, setting the speed to 200 would underexpose by 1 stop, same as setting it to 200 without a filter.setting it to 200 and taking a reading without the filter would underexpose by 2 stops which is pretty much fatal for shadow detail.
>>4100638I'm shooting on a Nikon FM, I doubt that the built in meter can correct a yellow filter, since it's so old there's no digital technology at all in the camera.Your advice is to just not compensate the filter? I've been compensating the filter by stopping down one stop so far.I just hoped there was a way I didn't have to compensate with the aperture/shutter speed settings
>>4100639>>4100639My train of thought is this:You're right I intend to half the cameras iso setting compared to my films iso to make the camera interpret the light intensity twice as high as it should be (I'm overexposing by one stop) which then should be corrected through the filter which only lets half of the intensity of the light pass into my cameraWhere's my mistake in that reasoning?
I’m getting rid of my iPhone 14 pro for a Samsung phone which has a worse camera , I love my iPhones camera as I primarily use it for concerts for videos and pictures, I don’t want to use the Samsungs camera for this, does anyone know a good camera I could get instead? Most concerts don’t allow cameras so it would need to be small or discrete as well
This photo had to be taken with a flash, right?
>>4100662no, steel reflector
>>4100008How does native iso work on my panasonic s5? For photography does iso100 performance worse than 640 for example?
Got a 100 dollar Amazon gift card burning a home in my pocket. What photo related shit would you recommend picking up off of there?
>>4100922Lens filter, like a good polarizer
>>4100925Was going to say this. Get NDs, Polarizers, or even UV filters to protect your glass. A spare camera battery, another SD card.
>>4100922a nice, hefty tripod
So how do I disattach two stuck to each other filters?
>>4101211I had an issue like that with extension tubes a few days agosince they are empty I just slammed them flat on the table and after that I could begin to unscrew themfor your case I suggest laying it on a rubber mat that wont slip, laying onother one over it and then trying to turn it while applying downward pressure. The rubber will grip the rim above and below and with flat palm you should be able to unscrew them
When you use the evf do you close your other eye?
>>4101305i don't use the EVFi look through the OVF with both eyes open and the camera away from my face unless I really need to see the exposure settings and electronic level
>>4100209Watch this fat faggot https://youtu.be/dBTb1l0jLIw
You just got to use the flash if you can.
I need the "it's a Pentax" meme, the one with the crying blacks. Anyone?
>>4100723Anything that specifically makes you think that? It's either AP or Reuters photo, I forget which, would reporters lug around reflector screens? And do they have enough range to illuminate the people? I like how the shadowed parts of the people are properly exposed despite shooting against bright light, if this is done with a reflector I'd be tempted to get one.
>>4100008What's the consensus on peepin' cameras?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1eIX-ovn0I
>>4100488The state of snoyfags
>>4100662My guess is theres a building with reflective glass to the left of the photo and its the afternoon
>>4101397That you can't beat the peep1000 for now
Anyone have an anchor solution for using a 1in wide rifle sling (pic related) for a 35mm film camera?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1296Image Height1620Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4100008If you push or pull the film and you're not revealing it by yourself, make a note for the guy revealing to push/pull that specific frame or he'll fuck up all your roll.
you should just learn to speak korean https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g-0FBEw0tQ
Where can I find a working lightroom crack?
>>4101675Various manufacturers make plates with a qd socket, but you’d have to run a one point sling.
>>4101679>specific frameumm aren't you supposed to push/pull the whole roll?
I know raising exposure in post can lead to increased noise, but is there any downside to lowering exposure in post?
>>4102686You can't bring back washed out highlights.
are film lenses "full frame"? will I get the results I'm expecting from buying an adapter and using it to put an old lens on my modern full frame camera?
>>4102875The 35mm film frame is the full frame.
>>4102875Not all of them, just 35mm ones. The ones made for 110 film and other smaller formats project a smaller circle.
>>4100240none, both are shit. you can find some nikon F801 for 10 bucks more
>>4100644>I doubt that the built in meter can correct a yellow filterit's a TTL filter so don't touch the iso setting, just slap your filter on and shoot the exposure your camera tell youSimple as
>>4102978fugg already bought the minolate and shot almost 2 rollsbut thanks:p hope wont be too terribkle
At what shutter speed should I be shooting wide landscapes, fast just doesn't look good and too slow makes too blurry, what is the right speed?
photography is so fucking gay why do you exist
>>4102878>>4102902thanks anons. I bought a cheap adapter so even if it doesn't work out I only wasted like $15
>>4101397definitely usable but not at extreme distances.. I grabbed this of yt few years ago, pretty good demonstration of video capabilities.. bayfiles.com / Y030e5Jay3
Why is 85mm supposed to be for portraits?
I'm trying very cheap and generic hardware to get into astrophotography and I'm switching between two dedicated cameras and my Galaxy s21 camera. The phone takes way better pictures as the other is a shitty lumix that offers no control and the other is a cheap entry Fuji camera I won in a bid for $15.So far, the phone camera isn't the that bad but all three pieces of equipment have their short comings but they all share not enough exposure time.Galaxy s21 allows a 50iso with 20 second exposure.Fuji allows a 8 second exposure (but still has a shit time capturing light)Lumix offers no control beyond 4 second exposure manual or 30 second exposure with an auto mode.Is there any sort of software hack I can do to force longer exposures or is it a literal hardware limitation?
is there a /p/ approved guide for noobs? I'm trying to read the board but have no idea what all the terms mean.also any tips for photographing birds?
>>4103788>also any tips for photographing birds?study dentistry or buy a crop sensor camera. the croppest crop you can cop. micro four thirds? sure. nikon coolpix p1000? crop. cop it. dear fucking god i hate bird photography and i hate birds
Why would I commit to increasing my ISO when I can just make it brighter in post if I need to? Both seem to have the exact same affect on the final photo.
>>4103656usually a focal that can still be very fast, focal distortion is not disfiguring, still small enough to minimise camera shake
I have a lens which appears to have some internal damage to the glass that I can only see from a very specific angle when I shine light on it. As far as I can tell, it doesn't affect my images. How is this possible? Also, how would this impact the value of the lens when I sell it?
>>4103805so you can use faster shutter speeds or smaller apertures?
>>4103656for common portrait framing, it puts you at a camera to subject distance where perspective distortion is pretty flatteringgives you more subject isolation than a 50, and much more common / smaller / cheaper / versatile, than 105-135mm lenses which are also great for portraitsportrait work is done at all kinds of focal lengths, they just give a different look and may be better/worse for the type of portrait you are going for>>4103805best case, it's basically the samemost cases it's close enough to not care, but probably slightly worse, and always run the risk of clipping shadowsin many cases, it's much worse, picrel is a few models at iso 100 and pushed 5 stops in post
I'm doing a small, paid photo gig in a few weeks' time. Nothing special, just a friend hosting an event for an organisation and they want some snaps. Is $50 (CAD) a reasonable ask for two hours of photographing? I want $50 for it but $40 is more tame and I could ask for that too without being too bothered.
>>410365685mm is just a good focal length, that's all! :)
>>4103984it's EXTREME lowballing to the point that if it wasn't your friend, you'd probably be declined because it's suspiciously low. If you were doing it for the friend personally, sure, that's cool to cover the cost of transport and shit but doing it in any professional capacity it's way too low. If it's a charity/non-profit/educational organization, go with $100 as a courtesy. If it's anything corporate, at least $200 depending how much editing is involved and how far do you have to travel.
>>4104047Damn, really? I was going off the fact that I would have been there anyway and bringing my camera is literally free. I guess I'm selling myself short, but I don't like feeling like I'm taking advantage
anyone used the gx7 mark iii?I need a lightweight camera to take hiking
>>4104087Googling around the minimum wage in Canada seems to be around ~$15 depending on province. So you're asking for $10 over minimum wage to cover>transportation time and cost>gear amortization>time spent editing>insurance/tax if applicable Literally no skilled professional in almost any trade would ask anywhere near that low.
I always hear about which developer gives fine grain but which developer gives rough grain I want that nasty big grain look[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 6sCamera Software15.7.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:11:16 20:47:59Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating500Lens Aperturef/2.2Brightness-0.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.15 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4101211You could try putting them between your palms and using the glass as grip as you twist each hand.
>>4104365Probably rodinal I'd think. You could also try pushing your film maybe? What film are you shooting?What the fuck is going on with the edges of your print? Do you not have an easel? It also looks a bit out of focus
I use this flash with my film camera. But can I use it with my digital one? Or do I need to buy a new one[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3696Image Height3930
>>4104410no because they run at different voltages and i wouldnt be willing to try unless you wanna risk damaging both the camera and the flash
>>4103831because the angle you see the damage isnt the only angle light hits the sensor on that spot. The overlap of different angles of light hitting the sensor will cover up minor stuff but with enough pixel peeping and/or damage/fungus/whatever will soften up the image and cause defects.