[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 12 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]

[Advertise on 4chan]

CCD benefits

Can anybody explain what are the benefits of CCD versus CMOS?

I heard something about the sensor's layer composition that helps getting good sharpness with old lenses, as being closer to how film performs in the focal plane rendering.

look at the grain of any CCD picture, pure SOUL
some special magic
Same shit as CMOS but noisier and more expensive.
File: ccd vs cmos.jpg (362 KB, 1606x879)
362 KB
362 KB JPG
Old sensors tried to look like slide film as that is what 99% of pro work was shot with.

Modern sensors try to look as sterile and true to life as possible.

Of course there are exceptions.
File: imgp4271.jpg (477 KB, 1824x1216)
477 KB
477 KB JPG
No idea as I've never used anything else than CCD

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX Corporation
Camera ModelPENTAX K10D
Camera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.31
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2022:09:18 14:34:36
Exposure Time1/90 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1600
Exposure Bias1/2 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length80.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1824
Image Height1216
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Subject Distance RangeMacro
Reminder that these threads are just a way to increase the used market prices by pretending that older tech is vastly superior to modern one. This causes the average zoomer and millennial to spend extra cash buying obsolete cameras thinking their photography will be better if they buy this magical sensor.
based pentaxchad

Which one you recommend?
this lol
>Can anybody explain what are the benefits of CCD versus CMOS?
Cheaper to make low-volume runs in CCD.
That's not CCD vs CMOS, it's strong vs weak color filter array. CCD and CMOS are colorblind, the colors are produced by the mosaic filter.
That's why D2X and 5D have so-called "CCD colors" despite being CMOS. It's about design choices
They try to emulate ccd colors maybe, but theyre not quite there.
Ccds are closer to slides than cmos imitating ccds are, there is a clear cut difference.
The CCD on the Leica M8 (and I assume with similar properties M9 too maybe) has this spectacular feature where it's almost impossible to clip highlights unless you intend to or you're some kind of spectacular retard ape who can't walk and breathe at the same time. (I've only done it a couple of times.)
This anon gets it.

>muh strong cfa!
The irony of this claim is that color accuracy went up with newer, weaker CFAs. The problem wasn't RGB separation, it was noise, and a weaker CFA reduces noise.

Old CCDs are closer to slides because they have less dynamic range like slides. If you want to emulate slides, pull the exposure down and let some of the shadows/highlights go in post.
There are none.
In camera processing and individual pixel size matters more than sensor design.
>The problem wasn't RGB separation, it was noise
>The problem wasn't RGB separation, it was noise
So if ccds had stronger cfa, how come the leica m8/9 and every digishit ever have ass washed out colours??
File: metamerism.png (210 KB, 2434x1930)
210 KB
210 KB PNG
>color accuracy went up with newer, weaker CFAs
it didn't though, the sensitivity metamerism index went down
they mistake different colors and assume them to be the same
Based Panasonic is going to right the wrongs committed over the years by the camera industry with their organic sensor. A new dawn of color is coming.

[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.