Post your cuties and general gear discussion.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
Which is better?
>>4061734the middle one
>>4061734Right technically, left I like more, fuck smoothness
>>4061734Let me guess, same gear?Left appears to be overprocessed, the letters on the sign is morphing into different shapes.
cutie![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationBottom, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
E-mount is nigh invincible at this point.Add to the list the upcoming Samyang lens: https://i.4cdn.org/p/1658841033770492.png
>>4061734right, significantly. Did you take those?
What causes these unnatural patterns in the image? Is it some JPEG artifact?
>>4062169>>4062147Yes. Left is iPhone 12 Pro and right is NX Mini with the 9mm.
Aint cute but got this Nikon lens to mess around with[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiImage Width1284Image Height1695
>>4062357I bet that Nikkor Focus ring feels pleasant to use.The Sony 55mm also has a well dampened precision engineered feel to it.It's one of the reasons why I can't stand lenses from Samyang and Tamron. Sigma is the exception to that rule.
Did a 1/4s exposure at f/16 on Kodak 250D film a few weeks ago. Curious to see how that particular frame turns out[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSonyCamera ModelXQ-BT52Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2Sensing MethodNot DefinedImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1024Image Height768Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:07:10 22:10:53Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating177Lens Aperturef/2.2Brightness2.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceD65FlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length1.66 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height768Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4062359I have that Sigma 24mm, it's good but the build quality almost goes too far, there's really no point in the hood being metal and machined to match, other than just being fancy. Some Samyang's aren't bad, I have the older manual 135mm and while plastic it's very nice to use. I also have the newer 45mm and THAT is the definition of plastic fantastic, it feels super cheap and hollow, but does take good photos.
>>4062363>there's really no point in the hood being metal and machined to match, other than just being fancy.It will make the reviewers praise the lens more. Doesn't matter if it's functionally inferior to rubber shock absorption.They will praise the metal build, and that's exactly what the manufacturer wants.The Focus ring does need to be metallic though. And it's not enough with that. It needs to be connected with some goo that dampens it and makes it smooth in usage.
>>4062359The lens is mint, and it is pleasant to use the focus ring. Ended up getting the lens free so its a win in my book.
>>4061716Bit of a shame the NX system is 100% dead, samsung is at least capable of making competitive camera chips, since they have experience producing SoCs.The NX mini system is 4000% dead, so is the Nikon 1 and even EOS M, this killed off compact mirrorless for good.
If I want a polarized light source, can I just buy a $10 video light and stick a polarizer film in front of it?
>>4062550>Bit of a shame the NX system is 100% deadIt's because of the H.265 codec, unlike H.264, HEVC is proprietary and requires paying for a license to use it. Samsung didn't know this, sadly. They added HEVC support without paying for the license which essentially meant they were selling pirated software
>>4062598Pretty sure samsung should have the license, they've been making chips with hevc encoders & decoders for years.Also AVC does require a license, it's not free. So is VVC.
Whats a budget starter telephoto with autofocus for F mount? I have an old Kiron 70-210mm which I like a lot but the lack of autofocus means I'm missing the sharpness of capturing moving objects because I cant focus in time.I have a D7000 so DX is fine, but when I look up nikons 70-200 its almost 2 grand so there must be a better option
>>4062630Nikon has the 55-200, 55-300, and 70-300 as the budget telephoto options. They all come in a variety of models (VR, AF-S/P, etc).Honestly, the 200-500 at $1300 is decent too if you want a lot more reach.
>>4062641Will i need a bipod to use these telephotos or can I walk around the city handheld in good lighting?
>>4062679In good lighting you should be fine. Consider that if you're doing something fast action (sports, birds flying, etc), you'll usually be at a high enough shutter speed to where VR isn't that helpful for the shot. VR can even just looking through the lens though, and of course is super helpful as your shutter speed gets lower. For those budget lenses I'd say it's usually worth the $50-100 premium.The 200-500 is also handholdable, but definitely would want some support long term due to the weight.
>>4062683Thanks for the advice. I think i'll try the 55-300, it has VR and i could get it for under 200. It will help fill a gap in my lenses too, Right now I have a 12-24 wide angle, a 35 prime and 50 prime, getting a 55-300 would give me the upper range without having to always carry my 50 around.
>just buy the heaviest tripod you're willing to carry around>not going to use it that much, better get the 60 $ Manfrotto compact action>good three months pass>lose the fucking 20 $ quick release screw in your small apartment, not finding it after days of search>pain
>>4062601There were rumors of the NX line being killed due to patent violations of some kind
Anyone have this lens? I'm having some weird issues with it. First off, when I screw it into the camera body (t3i) it seems like a really tight fit compared to any other lens/body combination I've used. I'm almost afraid I'll break my camera or the lens if I keep turning. Also, when I screw it all the way it, I don't it feel clicking to lock in place. My 50mm for example I can definitely feel the clicking. It seems locked in tight, I just don't feel it clicking. Other than that it seems to work fine. When I first got it, I had issues with the lens not being recognized by the camera, some anon suggested to tighten the screws and that seemed to fix it. Are all EFS 24mms like this or did I just get a dud?
>>4062749I own this lens and don't have these problems. I will say it feels a little tighter when screwing in than other ef lenses, but this is an EF-s lens so you should expect that. EF-S lenses have a deeper reaching mount, that's why EF-s lenses can't be used on ef cameras, just EF-s compatible cameras. However, it shouldn't feel like you're going to break anything when mounting so you probably have some sort of dud, or you're using an ef only camera and are fucking it up
>>4062749>>4062769I just realized you said you were using a t3i so it's definitely just a dud
>>4062749You can probably fix it by replacing the bayonet. Get a JIST screwdriver set.
>>4061734leftif you're going to take pictures of nothing you might as well make the colors pop/look interesting
Bros my uncle wants to buy into the full frame meme, even though he absolutely does not need it. His last 5 cameras were: Nikon D3200, D3300, D3400, D3500, D7200. He has no idea what he's doing.What's the best normie mirrorless camera I can recommend to him to keep him from spending his life savings on a sony a7number? He won't buy any lenses ever, but insists that it has to have an interchangeable lens mount
>>4062857Is your uncle not an adult with a job? Let him blow his money on ff if it will make him happy. I know what these kinds of people are like and he will probably never be satisfied otherwise knowing he hasn't has the FF Experience(TM) and will stubbornly go and buy what he wants behind your back anyway. Maybe find a deal on an eos RP or something, or tell him to get an old cheap FF cam off ebay to see if he really truly cares about having to stand back a little more or not...
Went to an air showWas a bit frustrating tbhfam, thinking about finally upgrading from my trusty K-3[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4063105Want to hang on to my pentax for macro stuff but thinking a D500 or something and a tele for action/BIFanything else to consider? not sure I want to get into mirrorlessdon't even mention m4/3
>>4063105The preview sure didn't do this one justice, that's amazing! What kind of shutter speed stops an aircraft?
>>4063111I usually use 1/2000 sec for BIF so just used that (though I’ve gotten by before with 1/500 sec when light was low)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelPENTAX K-3Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.10Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution600 dpiVertical Resolution600 dpiImage Created2016:05:25 15:37:46Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating500Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4063112Have been doing lots of macro stuff lately so haven’t had to deal with the Pentax AF struggle in a few years Took hundreds of photos and only a handful of useable ones and even those are p bland and not great[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareInstagramImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height533
To Tamron 180mm f3.5 Macro or not? I love my 90mm Adaptall SP, but a longer working distance would be nice, and they're 1/3 the price of the Canon 180mm and 1/4 the Nikon 200mm. On the other hand, £250 is £250.
>>4063117Find out how much working distance it has.Formulate all of the use cases with poential situation/subjects for the lens.Then decide whether it's something you can't already do with your current gearOr consider whether there are better options for thos particular use cases., for example maybe you want a difference type of Tripod macro that had better magnification, etc.
>>4063120For 1:1 it's a ~25cm working distance (lens to subject) vs. ~9cm, so a pretty big improvement. Got a geared slider, but usually just end up being lazy and resting on a knee and eating a few stops of noise to compensate ('m hoping the extra working distance would actually help here, due to blocking less light).
>>4063127>For 1:1 it's a ~25cm working distanceOkay, now consider how heavy the lens is, are you really going to shoot handheld macro with it?Or will it be stuck on a tripod?If it will be stuck on a tripod, what particular situations/subjects do you really, really need it for that you couldn't already do?
Tested how much highlights the in-camera development recover. Here's all sliders at 0[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.31Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:07:30 21:15:15Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1824Image Height1216RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4063136This one's ISO=-1, contrast=+1, saturation=+1. I think it looks a bit better[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareK10D Ver 1.31Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:07:30 21:16:05Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1824Image Height1216RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4063114there's going to be an airshow in my country in a few weeks but I doubt there'll be any vintage aircraft and our shit air force only has like 5 a4s lol
>>4063112Hey man, nice to see you again. I moved on to K-1 and the AF performance is a real upgrade from the K-3 but I heard good things about the K-3 Mk3 as well. Just make sure you couple it with a good lens and not a slowpoke like the 55-300[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelPENTAX K-3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2015:11:26 13:44:03Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4063127>I'm hoping the extra working distance would actually help here, due to blocking less lightIt won't because with the longer working distance comes shallower DoF and you WILL need to close down the aperture more to get a workable photo if not resorting to focus stacking.Upgrading from the usual 90-100mm starting point of macros is shorter focal length getting more DoF with open aperture, thus getting more light.
Does anyone here actually calibrate their lens? My photos are never tack sharp, I always just figured my hands are shakey or I’m take a photo of something that doesn’t have enough contrast to properly edge detect or something. Will calibrating my lens actually make much of a difference?
What do you think is the worst lens released by Snoy?
>>4063226Nah, I tried a 50mm macro but that was just a pain in the arse to use in practice with the tiny working distance. And I don't have probe-lens-money either.
>>4063111>>4063112for jets you can just crank up the shutter speed and be fine with it. prop driven aircraft are kind of a pain since you want to keep the plane sharp but blur the prop to suggest motion. 1/250-1/500 is usually where I try to be for that, it varies by aircraft how fast the prop spins. you need to practice panning with them. too fast a shutter speed and you freeze the prop like this guy >>4063114
>wage comes in on friday>barely enough to return 500 to my savings account after haveing withdrawn 1000 to pay for a week of holiday>had to spend 1000+ after my backpack with two lenses was stolen last month>still decide to buy a macro rail because I'll just keep kicking that can down the road>can't make my mind up about whether to buy the longitutinal or horizontal quick release base>end up buying the cross one for 150 moreHELP
>>4061716Please recommend me a drone, client wants aerial photos/video for a small farm, my budget is 600 dollars. I would greatly appreciate any suggestions, friend of mine is saying to go with the DJI Mini 2
>>4063512you sure you don't want to invest a little bit more? Drones really are the future for commercial photo/video, even the most basic bitch jobs include drones these days. You can get something pretty capable for $600 but if you're doing this for a living I'd spend a bit more than a price of a cheap lens for such a pivotal piece of gear.
>>4063513Since this would be my first drone i just want to dip my feet in the water and get something that suits my current needs, but i get you and yes i could up the budget a bit but I would love to get some suggestions.
>>4061716I have a blackmgic pocket 4k and the ir filtering is shit. What ND filter with IR cut works well? circular ones, not 10x10..
>>4063234The very old 16 and 20 pancakes are terrible
What is the best silicon case for the Z9?
>>4063523looking at that makes me want to barf
>>4063523>she doesn't use an L bracket
>>4063706aesthetic as fuck
>>4063275for a super zoom it's actually not that bad
The cutest coming through.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAXCamera ModelPENTAX K-7Camera Softwarepaint.net 4.3.11Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2022:08:01 07:45:30Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4672Image Height3104RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeMacro
>>4063690>sheDID YOU JUST ASSUME MY GENDER????
If the new 1.4x is good then I might finally cave and buy the 70-200 GM II. 1.4x should pair with the 200-600 decently as well.
>>4063811>protruding elementNo thanks
>>4063828All good teleconverters are like that.
>>4063828Most TCs other than really old ones have protruding elements. It's more obvious on mirrorless TCs since the TCs are shorter
>>4063862This one also gives AF to MF tele lenses
>>4063863Pentax is a crop company. They don't even do quality optics in general.
Just copped pic related. What am I in store for?
>>4063513I got the Mini 3 Pro edition, best i could do.
>>4063868[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.6ISO Speed Rating5000Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length62.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAuto
>>4063924Irrelevant to the topic at hand where you deceptively tried to compare FF televoncerters to crop teleconverters.
>>4063928>Pentax is a crop company>shown pic of FF Pentax with FF lens>IrrelevantHA!Also both of those TCs are FF compatible, have the DA TC right here on my FF Pentax. The 1.7x TC was in the film era, of course it is FF compatible you nonce
>>4063941Fair enough, but you shouldn't really be bragging about oldass crappy teleconverters as you they were some golden standard.
>>4063943>oldass crappyThe 1.7x TC is still sharp today and also gives AF for manual glass, the HD DA 1.4x TC is sharp as fuck and doesn't degrade IQ in any way on any of my lenses, be it the 300mm prime or the 70-200/2.8 and was made for modern high resolution sensors.Way to be a loudmouth when you know nothing about lenses and teleconverters. You must be a zoomer child.
>>4063952You're either implying those pentax teleconverters are better than the others above, or you're implying your eyes are so damaged you could never tell the difference.
>>4063953Maybe you should check your eyes or practice reading some more, school will help with that.I never stated one was better than the other, I stated these new MILC TCs have massive protruding elements and those only allow a few select lenses to be used on them. No thanks, I'd rather have a TC that allows whatever lens I want to put on.
>>4063958So then the issue is with your eyes, you're okay with subpar teleconverters from half a century ago, and there is nothing wrong with that.Just try not to pretend they are on the same tier as modern ones.
>>4063912A good time. The X-T3 is a great camera. It is the X-T2 perfected. The X-T4 is the X-T3 corrupted. Don't resell yours.
>>4063961Thanks for outing yourself as knowing nothing about cameras and photography.
>>4063958>these new MILC TCsThat's not an issue with MILC. The Pentax TC is special but when you have such a shitty TC it's basically no better than just croppinghttps://www.nikonusa.com/en_INC/IMG/Assets/Common-Assets/Images/Teleconverter-Compatibility/en_US_Comp_chart.html
>>4063958>I stated these new MILC TCsProtruding elements has been the standard for quality TC's for the last 20-30 years. Every Nikon TC with AF (back to 1992), and every Canon EF TC (1988) has protruding elements. Sony didn't with the A-mount, but did with the E-mount. Olympus didn't with the original 4/3 mount, but they do with m43 (along with Panasonic). Fuji does as well.Pentax, and 3rd parties, are really the only one that don't nowadays. You might have better compatibility with using lenses you otherwise couldn't (honestly probably shouldn't bother), but that comes at a decrease in optical quality. Even Pentax knew this, which is why the old "pro" quality TC's from Pentax used to protrude, and they made cheaper / more compatible TC's that didn't.
kinda want to rent a sony mirrorless FF and adapter and test it out with my canon lenses, any suggestions for this in Germany?
>>4064033wait i'm retarded, the R5 is actually good so i dont have to switch bodiesanywhere any suggestions about where to rent an R5 then?
>accidentally ordered sigma 50 f/1.4 instead of the Art version.fuck. At least mpb has a 7 day no questions asked return policy. I'll probably lose $ on shipping though
>>4064066are the art lenses as sharp as they say?
>>4064069The online comparisons...it is good and a step better than the previous iteration. Worth $500 used though, oof. Buy once cry once though if I stick with this $230 lens I'll always wonder and want to upgrade to the art so I'll just get it over with.
>>4063924Sigma are still laughing at how they forced Ricoh to copy their lens design since they refused to release any future K-mount lenses
>>4064091>they forced Ricoh to copyWhy would they laugh at that? Was Rico forced to may them money or what?
>>4064091Lol dream more, that’s a star lens, all star lenses are 100% in house Pentax designs
This is a stupid question but.... if my favorite lens resolves at best 8MP is there any reason at all to use it on a higher resolution camera than I already have?
>>4064170Most people will tell you "no". But a higher resolution sensor can usually provide you a diminishing returns, like....+1% more resolution.So basically not worth it.
Batis lenses were the early prototype of what would later become the VXD electromaget autofocus "motor".https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/03/lensrentals-tears-down-the-zeiss-batis-25mm-f2-lens/[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IIIMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2016:03:11 11:08:27Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias1/3 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width600Image Height431RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4064170You'd still get better overall performance, and higher res image scaled down to 8mp should still look better than native 8mp, but it's pretty marginal gains for weaker lenses.
>>4064170yes cuz bayer
what's a good travel tripod i can put in a carry-on
>d850 came in the mail todaybased. This thing is an ABSOLUTE UNIT
Anyone purchased from mapcamera on ebay? I'm planning on buying a few fuji lenses from, they have very good rating on ebay. I'm picking up the 10-24 wide zoom, 50-200 zoom and the 35mm 1.4, I dont have any other lenses apart from the 18-55 kit. I can probably pick up one more lens any recommendations?
>>4064602Is the OVF higher image quality than the Pentax K1?
>>4064617Both are 100%, wtf are you talking about?
>>4064619It's optics, one optics is surely sharper than the other.
>>4064398Manfrotto Befree carbonAlso bean bag
What studio lights do I get for indoor shooting? I have no idea what's useful. Do I need different color temperatures? No clue where to start.
>>4064620Are you stupid or just high?
>>4064626Not only will they have a difference in sharpness, the T-stop will also be different.I guess you're just too dumb to be curious.
>>4064617Can't speak for clarity, but the D850 viewfinder is higher magnifcation (0.75x vs 0.7x). The K-1 has greater eyepoint distance (~21mm vs 17mm), and marginally greater diopter adjustments.D850 will look bigger, but K-1 might be easier to use if you wear glasses. D850 viewfinder is on the larger side of FF DSLRs, K-1 viewfinder is pretty standard for FF DSLRs.
>>4064626Pentax has the best pentaprisms on their DSLRs, other brands don't even come close
>>4061716Are the nx cameras any good? I can get almost for free a nx3000 and nxmini. Is any of those decent?
>>4064660Get the NX mini just so you have a tiny ILC camera.The entry NXs are pretty small for APS-C cameras, but that's compared to today's cameras.
>>4064644It's something that needs objective testing before we can prove that.Too much blatant fanboyism around to trust any such random claims.
>>4064617no clue. It is sharper than my previous camera but that doesn't say much being a d3400
I'm thinking about getting a Nikon AI-S 50mm f1.8 Series E for my canon 20d, what are some other good budget 50mm primes?
>>4064398whatever you buy, don't get >>4064621it's super flimsyget one of the leofotos or fotopros instead
Guys, what's the DSLR camera with the best sensor?Now that plenty of professionals are going to sell their gear for cheap I want to get myself a decent DSLR and here's what I care about>don't care about resolution, if it has more than 8MP it's enough for me>don't care about jpeg color science, I'm going to edit every photo and I only care about raw manipulability>don't care about low light, I'll only shoot near base ISO so I mostly care about dynamic range>the mount has to have very good lenses
>>4064942Get a d810 or a d850. dxomark rates both of their sensors highly.
>>4064949I can go to dxomark myself, I would prefer some actual opinions :/
>>4064942My experience with the Nikon D700 has been very positive, good colours in raw, pretty good dynamic range. Very well rounded camera.While I have not had personal experience with them, the D4 and the Df both have incredible dynamic range from the photos I've seen.And it being nikon they're natively compatible with lenses from the stone age.I cannot give you opinions on any other brands simply due to lack of personal experience.
Should I get a Leica Q or a X100V? How can I decide? I guess I prefer the 35mm length but as a single-camera collection, it will be useful to have 28mm.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLEICA CAMERA AGCamera ModelLEICA Q (Typ 116)Camera Software3.16Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:01:03 13:34:00Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/1.7Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1086Image Height724RenderingNormalWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4064942Why are they going to sell their gear?
>>4064950He's right though. D850 especially (which was where they introduced BSI) is a strong contender for pretty much any definition of "best sensor". The huge number of pickles and low-light capability just come along for the ride with the improvements in dynamic range that have happened over the years. It's not like you have to sacrifice one of those things to minmax another, they just all advance as technology improves. Dynamic range improvements have slowed down in recent years so you might well find an older model quite good enough. But the newer sensors are going to be measurably better.
LADS QUICKLY, I bought an XT3 and it's fine and all but i'm thinking of returning it and adding 500 euro to that to get a Canon R + kit 24-105. I used Canon DSLR before. Is it worth it or no? Mostly used for dope ass travel photography like sunsets and whatever, but also pics of hoes.
>>4064942Nikon D810, D850, Pentax K-1, K-1 MkII
Another imminent win for L-mount alliance.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 23.4 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width550Image Height457Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:08:04 11:39:36Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width943Image Height660
>>4065151Hoes will probably prefer your X-T3. What lens do you use with it, the 18-55?
>>4065198>L-mount alliance>only member contributing good shit is germanyWW2 all over again.
>>4065121But the D850 will cost a fuck ton of money for a long time. I was thinking about the D3s which I heard puts out incredible files, but I don't know how true it is
>>4065243>only member contributing good shit is germany>germanySigma isn't German dummy
which external flash do you recommend to buy for sony a6000? im in europe and i want something small and resistant to humidity/dust/shaking
Please talk me out of a white SL-1. There's one being offered with the matching 18-55mm and 40mm for £250 and my gear acquisition syndrome is screaming at me.
>>4065306I wouldn't give a damn aboutv the color of the camera/kit at all. It's a great deal and the SL 1 is more than capable of taking good photos. Also, the 40mm STM is sharp af.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 70DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2013:10:30 23:26:04Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4065274One that fits
>>4065274Godox TT350s or V350s.
>>4065306I use a beaten black 100D which I got years ago as "temporary" replacement when my previous potato stopped working. My only issue is the screen is not articulated. Other than that its tiny for DSLR and does the job well enough for me.
>>4065312>>4065321I already have and am using a 5D Mk II, so at most this would be a backup camera.
>>4065322If you have already that, I'd consider a 2nd camera that can do things it can not do. (A tough for example. It will be relatively shit but can go where a dslr can not.)
I found this Brownie Flash III at a charity shop for £15 (about $18). Looks to be in great condition. Shutter still works, still has its spool. Nothing seems to not be working, just got it today. Have I copped a great deal?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone SE (1st generation)Camera Software15.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:08:05 15:28:11Exposure Time1/17 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/2.2Brightness-0.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.15 mmImage Width3293Image Height2883Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4065326It already has a pop-up flash that's better than most small flashes because it can point upward.
>>4065374It uses 620 film which is not generally available.The 620 spool is slightly smaller than 120 film (which is still available) and some fiddling is likely needed if you actually want to take photos with it. Or pay for someone who does the spool fiddling for you.
>>4065379I'm certain the conversion of 120 to 620 isn't terribly complicated. I'm sure it won't cost much, either.
>>4065379To add, I got my Brownie 2 for £2 plus shipping (around $10) and while it was in condition of £2 camera and obviously had been stored in damp attic for ~70 years it works fine and takes 120 film. I consider that good value.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelScanJet G4050Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.12Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1420 dpiVertical Resolution1420 dpiImage Created2022:08:05 18:07:58
>>4065383Brownies just work.
>>4065375it is broken in my camera and it costs equivalent of about 67 usd
I'm looking to upgrade from my old 20d to something else more modern and usable, but not too expensive on the used market . What should I get?
>>4065405Get a 60D
>>4065443Scratch that, get a 70D
>Macro rail finally arrivedHope I won't regret spending 350 eurobucks on this[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T20Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T20 Ver2.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)49 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:08:05 22:35:43Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.7Brightness-1.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlashFocal Length32.90 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1776Image Height1184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>>4065469Novoflex is such an over-hyped company. I‘d never pay $350 for that.
>>4065494He said eurobucks. That's like $380.
>>4065405>>4065447You might want an 80D instead anon
>>4065498Scratch that, you want a 1DX MkIII
>>4065494>over-hypedDunno, here the only people who buy and shill it are Canonikon boomers. They're obviously crazy expensive because everything is manufactured in Germland. A bit like RRS devoid of sex appeal. But they offer a range of macro solutions no one else does. Don't look up their motorized rails lel.I could've gotten either the horizontal or longitudinal sledge on top, which would've made it about €150 cheaper. But I knew I would have hated myself the second I needed to switch orientation so I got the cross sledge (which price aside is great design and should be copied by other companies)
>>4065469I bought a macro rail last year and never used it.Turns out I get less perspective change just moving the focus
>>4065541Ah well, let's see. I can probably still sell it for 250 if I end up not using it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-S10Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-S10 Ver2.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:07:30 19:28:08Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/7.2Brightness3.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlashFocal Length80.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1776Image Height1184RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeManual ExposureContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
Is the Sony A SLT-35 worth getting as a good older camera? Or am I better off getting something else?
>>4065469What are these dangleys people put on their cameras these days. What's the idea?
>>4065602They are the anchors for the Peak Design straps. Quite good actually
>>4065350I really like the sound of the 40mm though. It's just that there's all the other stuff tacked on. I'm thinking of playing with the other stuff for a bit then selling it on, but I am a bit iffy on the second hand market for an EOS 100D. The ones I see on eBay are listed at about £180 with the kit lens, apart from the "Buy It Now" stuff at a ridiculous price no one wants, but there aren't many bids.
I'm really impressed with the IQ of the NX mini. I'm also enjoying it as it's the first zoom lens I've owned in a long while.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNGCamera ModelNX miniCamera SoftwareFW Ver 01.10Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)59 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:08:05 17:42:56Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating160Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length22.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5472Image Height3648Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormal
>>4065638Right, all you need to do is post a good photo
>>4061716are any of the sony DSLRs worth looking at getting? or am i better off getting one of their mirrorless cameras
>>4065662No, SLT died for a good reason
>>4065672too much of a meme?
>>4065647Sir, this is a gear thread.
>>4065662SLTs are gay, they have EVFs. Worst of both worlds, reflex flange and mirrorless viewfinder.
>>4065692so just go with a cheap pentax and a 50mm lens then. gotcha
>takes worse pics than a 10 y/o phone>no viewfinder, only a hole>no flash>looks cheap as fuck>over $100 + tipWhy did you let this happen?
>>4065677Consider the latest true SLTs, A77II and A99, both had remarkably shit AF, while the viewfinder used the sensor the AF used the translucent mirror and a proprietary AF sensor design that didn't use the proper phase optics. Sony had to put a full A7II into the A99II to make it work and still the SLT AF was subpar even to beginner DSLRs like the 550D.It was a shitshow with mindblowingly expensive glass that produced blurry shit half the time because of the shitty AF.At the time everyone talking about how bad was Pentax AF while Sony SLT was never mentioned. Pentax was 80% hit on tracking and 100% on single while Sony SLT struggled on single AF with less than 80% hit and tracking was abysmal 40% or less. This is on the high end SLTs.Sony really had no other route but go with MILC full time.
>>4065705so its a boneless mirrorless camera that isnt woth the silicon put into the body
I'm looking for a small-ish camera with more than decent sharpness, can be a compact or an hybrid, something like, around 1500 max. I'm tempted by the x100v... I don't feel like I'll enjoy the GRIII's lack of viewfinder. I've been using a D300s for a massive while, I'm looking for something with more power to it.
>>4065744>x100v>small-ish cameraGet an Olympus Pen
>>4065757because it's a fun little camera with a broad choice of excellent lensesget the pen-f, though, the newer ones don't have a viewfinder anymore
>>4065755Pens are meh class, with any em10 you get very good evf for the same performance and about the same price.
>>4065720The Pentax K-01 performs infinitely better than an SLT and is actually pocketable.
soomy pentax KS-2 has fallen victim to the aperture block problem and so I'm considering buying a 120€ used pentax K200d as a replacementReason is that the pentax K70 has the same problem as the pentax KS2 so I don't want to have another 500€+ camera becoming unusable because of it. At least the used K200D is rather cheap and seems to take decent pics. What do you think ? Would you say it makes sense to use such an old camera in year 2022 ?
>>4065779The K-70 is after the revision of the aperture block. I didn't hear about any problems so it is safe to buy, besides the whole issue is about a number of batches from a dodgy supplier that Ricoh kicked out.But the K-200D for 120€ seems steep, you can buy a K-10D for that money. Why not look for a used K-5 or K-3 instead?Also some of these aperture block problems can be fixed DIY if you know how to handle a screwdriver but get a JIST screwdriver set. You can also try service, it is known Pentax serviced these aperture block problems highly discounted way after the recall period ended.
>>4065779Get a K-50, which basically is a K-5 underneath its cheaper shell.
>>4065785The K-70 is after the revision of the aperture block. I didn't hear about any problems so it is safe to buyhttps://www.reddit.com/r/pentax/comments/h7z57k/aperture_block_failure_pentax_k70/>But the K-200D for 120€ seems steep, you can buy a K-10D for that money. Why not look for a used K-5 or K-3 instead?I think there is a lens included, could probably drop the price by getting only the body. The appeal is that I can see it physically easily>Also some of these aperture block problems can be fixed DIY if you know how to handle a screwdriver but get a JIST screwdriver set. You can also try service, it is known Pentax serviced these aperture block problems highly discounted way after the recall period ended.yeah I tried the DIY way myself but I fucked up. I did everything right, removing the screws, taking note of the positions etc. I found the solenoid and while trying to remove the bottom part it goes flying inside the camera's body and got stuck on one of the magnetic components. After a lot of trying I gave up on the piece and put everything back together, the bottom part of the solenoid still being stuck somewhere. Somewhat it still works, except for the aperture of course. The guys from the store told me pentax didn't fix it anymore, guarantee or not. Maybe I should have tried contacting pentax first.>>4065786No I don't want to risk having an aperture block problem again, especially since I'm so bad at repairing electronics
>>4065469>400 dollars for an aluminum bar>Fujihipster>doesn't realise these aluminium macro rails can be had for 15 dollarsWhy am not surprised? I bet you paid 2000 dollars for that Tripod as well.
is the xt-3 / 18-55 worth it? I'm about to maybe buy one for 1k brand new, which is somewhat a good deal, but tell me, is it good, for you?
I need a telephoto for my Sony A6000, but I'm on a budget. Is the 55-210mm my only budget option? Is there anything between that and the Tamron 18-300 or Sony 70-350 in terms of quality and price? I'd like to be able to take telephoto landscapes and compressed images featuring people and the moon when the conditions allow. The fact that I can get the 55-210 off eBay for literally 1/5 the price of the Tamron and less than 1/6 the price of the Sony 70-350 really counts for something. Especially since they all have about the same aperture. My only concern is the functional 315mm focal length not being enough for my lofty ambitions and being unhappy with the lens because of that.
>>4065801It's the shills' favorite lens, even though it's inferior to the tamron 18-70 in every way.
If I have the Sigma 16mm f1.4 but find that sometimes it's not wide enough for the wide angle landscapes I want to capture, should I add an ultra-wide like the Rokinon 12mm f2 or 7Artisans 10mm f2.8 fisheye to my lineup? I want to be able to capture photos like pic related, taken at 16mm full frame. I'm thinking the functional 18mm focal length of the Rokinon might not be enough, and may be too close in look to the Sigma. The 7A lens could be very interesting. I think playing around with a fisheye could be fun, but that's secondary to being able to take photos like pic related. What are my best options here?
>>4065802>Especially since they all have about the same aperture.Aperture whoring won't help you in this case.The lenses you are comparing are made in different eras and with completely different skill levels of optical designers.That old lens is cheap only because nobody would want it otherwise. And even at 1/5th the price they still struggle to sell it.
>>4065801>which is somewhat a good dealIt's a good deal indeed, but the older Japanese copies of that lens are better on average>>4065803*17-70 and the Tamron is 1.8 times as heavy and 5 cm longerIt's a very different lens for a different purpose
>>4065814>1.8 times as heavyQuality requires heavy. Hipster requires expensive and crappy.
>>4065808>>I want to be able to capture photos like pic relatedkill yourself[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T20Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.32Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)83 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:08:06 22:18:33Exposure Time1/600 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/10.9Brightness9.8 EVExposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationUnknownContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
>>4065808Best one is photoshop composite tutorial.
>>4065788Ouch! You can only blame yourself.I have a K-3 for sale and in the EU just not sure about the price. 350€ sounds fair.
>>4065813I've seen sample photo comparisons from both lenses and the photos from the nicer lenses certainly are nowhere near 5x better. 15-20% in some situations at best.
>>4065852You're paying not just the improved image quality, but also the longer reach.
>>4065802I would help you find a good lens for your telephoto needs, also explain the various things you need to know about telephoto lenses and using them but you have a Snoy so fuck you(actually your options are not much better especially for your A6000 crap)
>>4065858Extremely rude.>actually your options are not much betterThey definitely are.Plenty of 600mm zoom options.A 500mm zoom option.Plenty of 40mm zoom options.
>>4065859>long telephoto>contrast detect AF onlySure
>>4065860Just stop pretending you know anything about E-mount cameras.
Is this normal bokeh for a Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS Full-frame Telephoto Model SEL70300G? I like the detail it captures for the things in focus, but the bokeh looks smeary and terrible for an expensive lens. If I return it do I have a chance of getting a better version? Does this have something to do with stabilization or steady shot being on?
>>4065878That lens was always a bad deal in my opinion. It's also from the era when Sony wasn't good at lens making.I would have gone for one of the 100-400 lenses instead.
>>4065878Holy shit that lens is a shitshow!
>>4065879>>4065880Kino pics anon keep it up. I can't help with your Sony questions but please keep bringing the kino, good job scrubbing the EXIF. Sick of Moopco trying to dox anyone who posts pics worth laying eyes on.
>>4065822it does sound like a fair price, where do you live in the EU ? I live in Belgium so if you're from the UK it might be tough
>>4065932I did say in the EU.You might not like it when I say Hungary.
>>4065945Mmh yeah I'm not sure it will be worth it in terms of shipping fees
>>4065880>>4065879"Make sure to get a good shot of the ass jim"
newfag here. i had the choice between nikon the d3200 plus 18-70 kit and a battery for 155.28$ and the d5100 with a sigma 18-70 2 extra batteries and a grip for 129.40$. i chose the d5100. i feel guilty for buying the d5100 because it has 6-8 more megapixels. did i make the right choice?
>>4066045I think you made the right choice, I think you'll get more use out of the extra goodies that you get with the 5100 than an extra 8mp.
The other day I got a new canon ef 50mm 1.8 stm and while it was very crisp, the manual focus by wire system was unusable due to lag. So I bought an Olympus f-zukio 1.8 50mm instead and am much happier with it, plus it was half of the already very low price of the canon.
>>4066117I have one of these too, the multicoated version I believe. Long story short, if anyone happens to know the size of the ball bearings they use for the aperture ring on these please let me know :^)
Does anyone have a Nikon AF-S DX Micro-NIKKOR 40mm f/2.8G? I'm looking for an entry level macro lens. All I have is a 35mm kit lens.
So on Sony E is there a point buying anything else for general macro use other than the Laowa 90mm 2x?
>>4066184The Sony G lens has autofocus which makes it multipurpose.And still has a focus ring with hardstops.The Laowa is definitely the superior specialised macro lens. Plus it's cheaper.The 90mm is much more compact than the 100mm made for DSLR.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M4Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.3.1 (Windows)PhotographerDustin AbbottMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)65 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2022:06:12 07:40:54Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness2.0 EVExposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length65.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4066138get a longer focal length for more working distance
>>4066186Get and EF adapter so you can access the 180mm Canon, Tamron and Sigma macros, and the MP-E 65mm if you want more extreme magnification.
>>4066292>180mmThat's a useless tripod macro lens. Too unwieldy to be handheld.And on Tripod there isn't anything it can do that a standard macro lens couldn't do.
what's the most fashionable camera strap
>>4066330chains if ur black, otherwise something made out of shit pulled from a starbucks dumpster or recycled jeans or something
>>4065198*Also available on E-mount
It's over for point and shoots.>Panasonic Holdings and Nikon suspending development of entry-level point-and-shoot cameras under their flagship brands.>Fujifilm has discontinued production of its FinePix compact cameras>Canon has not released any new Ixy cameras since 2017.>Sony Group has not offered any new compact models under its Cyber-shot brand since 2019 >Casio Computer halted production of Exilim cameras in 2018.
>>4066487eh I'm pretty sure high end point and shoots will still get made, no way we're not getting an RX100 VIII(what's unusual is how often the previous models got released). And Ricoh GR IIIx came out this year. But yeah, obviously entry level ones won't get made, what the fuck is the point of that?
>>4063105>He wants at the Seattle aviation museum The rest of my photos are 16mb each[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UES4AUINMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)72 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height2252Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:10:21 14:20:50Exposure Time1/142 secF-Numberf/2.4Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/2.4Brightness14.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length9.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height2252Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio3Scene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SM
>>4066293High ISO + reasonable light + IBIS = handhelding 180mm in the macro range works fine. It also means you're not wiping the front of your lens over the subject to achieve the desired magnification (OK if you have a probe lens, but not so fun with a regular lens and body that blocks out whatever light is available).And if you want any decent depth of field at appreciable magnification, you're going to be focus stacking with a rail anyway, so a longer lens makes things easier with the greater working room and not needing ludicrous assemblies like flexible arms to hang speedlights off of. >>4066487>X100 series still going>RX100 series still going>Q series still goingOnly cheap shit point & shoots are dead.
>>4066549>so a longer lens makes things easier with the greater working roomNope, there won't be any difference in that regard between a 100mm macro vs a 180mm macro.All you're doing is handicapping yourself with a 1,6 kilogram lens and forcing yourself to use a worse macro lens because some retard reviewer convinced you you need that extra working distance.
>>4066554>Nope, there won't be any difference in that regard between a 100mm macro vs a 180mm macro.100mm @ 1:1 ~150mm MWD180mm @ 1:1 ~250mm MWD
>>4066564>150mm MWDAre you saying this is a problematic working distance that compromises the lighting?
>>4066569Yes. Assume a 72mm filter size (fairly standard), at 150mm MWD you are covering an absolute minimum 0.72Sr blockage vs. 0.26Sr for 250mm MWD. And that's just an absolute minimum for the lens itself, once you start adding the body behind it, and the person operating the body, the difference get even larger. No need to fight the inverse-square law when you don't need to.
>>4066573Why don't you prove that?Lay down the math that supports your claim of the camera body blocking out so much light that it's unbearable to you.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6300Camera SoftwareILCE-6300 v2.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:08:04 11:51:02Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Brightness3.2 EVExposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>>4066575I literally just did, do you not know what a solid angle is?
>>4066581It looks to me like the lens is already blocking the body so it won't even interact with the subject.What so you thin will happen when you mount that lens on a Sigma fp?
this is the best system i've ever used prove me wrong
>>4066602They rested on their laurels for too long so they never supported the mirrorless camera generation.So now Godox owns the market.
>>4066330preserved human skin
>>4061716is pic related a good camera to cut my teeth on learning photography or am i better off getting something newer[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4066709I wouldn't bother.
>>4066709A little bulky but a perfectly good body nevertheless. The great thing about ancient digicams is if you get a good deal on it you won't lose much if anything reselling it if you don't like it, the prices are already rock bottom. Hell you might make money if you get lucky and youtubers start making NIKON D2X in 2022?!?!?!?!?!? videos
>>4066720they already have as far as i can see im just a miser so if i can cop this and a telephoto lens from MPB for under $350 im set as far as i can see way i see it is if i cant beat the basics into me with this than i should just give up
>>4066721I dunno about $350 for something that old, maybe if the lens makes up most of the value (check resale prices). You can definitely get something made in the last decade with that much and not a piece of shit either. In practice not sure how much better they are than the more pedestrian d200 that I see going on ebay regularly for less than $100 with a lens. If you really just want to learn the basics just get whatever the cheapest working dslr+lens combo there is on egay. Maybe even don't go for a modern AF lens and roll with a vintage 50 for a while so you can learn scale focusing and stuff.
>>4066727fair enough ive mainly been shopping around on mpb for used stuff, can get a "excellent condition" d2x for $209 there
i need wide lens for efm since last time 32mm was a bit too close when shooting indoorsf/2 22mm is best option i guess?
>>4066602Yongnuo was a great option like 10 years ago, but Godox / Flashpoint is where it's at now for budget flash systems.>>4066709Solid camera, built like a tank. It lacks a lot of the modern quality of life features, and the screen is awful. The IQ is totally usable, but again poor by today's standards (lower resolution, terrible high ISO). I'd be curious to see what the battery situation is like nowadays. I had a $100 D2h I rocked for a while, and back then the batteries alone were going for +$100, and that was 10 years ago. The principles are the same though, so learning on it would give you the skills to use on any other camera going forward.
>>4066737>Yongnuo was a great option like 10 years agoWhat likely happened was they saw the rise of smartphones and saw the decline in camera sales, and jumped ship prematurely.That explains why they never supported the E-mount hotshoes which is clearly a mistake in hindsight.Now they're trying to make some E-mount lenses late into the game. But now they are afraid of challenging godox who already has a massively established customer base.
>>4066554The longer the lens the more things also get in the way. At 120 mm FFE (which is what I'm using), shooting in tall grass can be quite annoying already. 10 cm more MWD is a lot of space for things to get into the way. On the other hand, it does have its advantages when shooting things like dragonflies or butterflies that won't let you get very close in the first place.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-S10Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-S10 Ver2.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:08:07 13:15:38Exposure Time1/240 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/10.9Brightness7.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length80.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1776Image Height1184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceUnknownChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeManualSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
Dayum, the LM-EA9 M to E adapter is pure quality.Miniturised, but +60% increased motor strength.KEK, they even made room for a stronger model in the future with 5 motors.
>>4065802Here's a shot of the moon taken with a 55-210 at 210mm and an NEX-7 camera (APS-C). Just something so you can see how much of the frame the moon occupies. The lens is light in weight and the price is right.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelNEX-7Camera SoftwareNEX-7 v1.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.3Focal Length (35mm Equiv)315 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2016:02:22 21:55:26White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Brightness2.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length210.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>tfw have 10-20 wide angle DX, 18-300 DX, 35 mm DX, and recently a 50 mm f/1.4 FX (just bought a FF)I kind of want another zoom for my FF but then again I can live with the vignetting effect when I use DX lenses by just shooting in crop mode and at least the images still look better than my old camera since the sensor is better. I just dunno what I want to get next.
was worth the hipster tax, I love this thing[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D500Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern812Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2022:08:09 14:15:46Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/3.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating4500Lens Aperturef/3.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4066735I'm not a canon user, but the 22mm lens on canon apsc (1.6x) is around 35mm FF equiv. your phone is 28mm FF equiv. and set it to 3:2 ratio to mimmick your camera. your 32mm lens is around 51mm FF equiv. gauge it from those if you dont have a kit lens. it really depends how wide you want it to be. for tight indoor portraits, the 22mm lens should be ok. but if you need those interior architectural, ultrawide, vlogging type shots, then the 11-22 lens is also ok, but its not as bright as the 22 f2 lens.
>>4066922I find that having the aperture ring behind the focus is kinda uncomfortable.
>>4066903Waiting on the Megatron Sony a7Riv figure
>>4066933I'll wait for the K-01 style banana themed Pentax K-1 to transform into Bumblebee
>>4066906why do they let japs write the english captions?
>>4066941Bumblebee will be a Nikon Z30
Will the introduction of RS make EFM cheaper?
>>4067055It will make them discontinued.
Outta my way, plebs!
>>4062857EOS R + RF 24-105/4Aside from a pretty shit ergonomics the EOS R's still a pretty deceent camera with nice AF, although not on pair with the likes of A7III/IV
Henlo /pee/I only have the kit lens for my D3500 and I'd like to get something nicer. I'd like to expand in both fashion/portraiture and astrophotography and I was wondering if there was a lens that could be a decent fit for both, do you have any recs? Under 400 bucks would be nice but I'd consider paying a bit more. Been looking into some models with 1.8-2.4 apertures and rather short focal lengths but I don't really know what to look for beyond that.
>>4067465I'd say start with a 50/1.8, then maybe a 135mm or an older design 70-200/2.8
>>4066737>>4066720does any old F mount lens work with it? or do i need to get a newer F mount lens for it?
>>4067487>50/1.8Neat, I was kinda torn between the nikkor 1.8G 35 and 50 lately so I wasn't sure which one thanks anon
>>4067502No, the D3500 doesn‘t support the old screw motor AF system. You can still use the lenses but only manually.You‘ll need at least a D90/D7000 or better to gain full screw motor AF compatibility.
>>4067512im the person asking about the dx2 but nice for him to know toodo the old full manual ones work with it?
>>4067513Most of them will work just fine. AI, AI converted, AI-S, AF, and AF-D, and most AF-S will all work just fine.Pre-AI won't mount. AF-P and some modern "E" (electronic diaphragm, not to be confused with older "Series E") will mount, but the electronics can't communicate and are effectively unusable.FWIW my D2h AF screw did die at some point, so couldn't AF with AF-D lenses (could with AF-S or manual focus course).