[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: aaaaaaaaaaa.png (350 KB, 1189x516)
350 KB
350 KB PNG
>>
yeah
>>
>>3967183
Talking about aesthetics or the craft and process is like pulling teeth, the spergs here can't into metaphysics or rigor.
>>
File: gearz.png (217 KB, 1088x345)
217 KB
217 KB PNG
Yeah, we should get rid of those pesky gear threads by making threads about gear threads. Oh wait...
>>
>>3967183
You can post your cat photos to your instagram.
>>
>>3967190
I'm actually more offended that this fucking faggot made 4 threads about exactly same thing.
>>
File: url.jpg (39 KB, 600x600)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>3967190
>talking about the problem will never help reach a solution to the problem
>>
>>3967198
Would you rather every single gear thread in the catalog be bumped?
>>
>>3967204
I'd rather talk about art and the process involved but the cargo cultists here aren't capable of it.
>>
>>3967204
That would mean just one 5DS R thread being bumped instead if 4 existing simultaneously and unnecessarily. So, for me, yes. I would prefer that
>>
>>3967206
the only places you can talk about intent and practice in art online are nontechnical spaces
>>
>>3967204
Yes, of fucking course. Why are you even asking?
>>
>>3967209
There are around 25 gear threads in the catalog.
>>
>>3967210
And 4 of them are for the exact same topic. What point are you trying to make here

>>3967208
We can make an effort for this to be more an artistic space than a technical (or consumerist) one. You've just gotta post photos and talk about them
>>
>>3967208
There are maybe 3 anons here who show any technical skill and enough pride in their work to not show garbage and make excuses for it.
>>
>>3967200
You could have posted a single post in one of those gearfaggotry threads instead of making a brand new one, fucking retard.
>>
File: DVwRJeyV4AAYTU4.jpg (64 KB, 680x680)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>3967221
>NOOOOO, DONT TALK ABOUT FAGGOTS MAKING MULTIPLE THREADS ON SAME TOPICS
>>
>>3967224
>hey fellas, I took some photos, sit back while I post them
>hey fellas, I took some photos, sit back while I post them
>hey fellas, I took some photos, sit back while I post them

Because the alternative is just soooo dynamic and interesting.
>>
>>3967235
taking photos lead taking better photos. Talking gear leads to nothing.
>>
>>3967211
>You've just gotta post photos and talk about them
Hylics can't do either.
>>
>>3967238
I'm not sure what you meant by this, but I assume it's a typo and you really intended to write a sentence that actually makes sense....????
>>
Somebody make a thread about threads complaining about gearfag threads.
>>
>paying over 150€ for f/1.1
>paying over 300€ for 1600mm
Idiots!
>>
>>3967335
hi moop
>>
>>3967183
What really bothers me is plain gearfaggotry. Gearfags are so lazy that they can't even google few photo samples from the nest to post along their gearfaggotry.
>>
>>3967335
I had this Kamlon in amazon basket today. After quick deliberation I pulled out on it. Should I still go for it?
>>
>>3967378
I remembered why I pulled out. 52mm thread.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.