>>3967183Talking about aesthetics or the craft and process is like pulling teeth, the spergs here can't into metaphysics or rigor.
Yeah, we should get rid of those pesky gear threads by making threads about gear threads. Oh wait...
>>3967183You can post your cat photos to your instagram.
>>3967190I'm actually more offended that this fucking faggot made 4 threads about exactly same thing.
>>3967190>talking about the problem will never help reach a solution to the problem
>>3967198Would you rather every single gear thread in the catalog be bumped?
>>3967204I'd rather talk about art and the process involved but the cargo cultists here aren't capable of it.
>>3967204That would mean just one 5DS R thread being bumped instead if 4 existing simultaneously and unnecessarily. So, for me, yes. I would prefer that
>>3967206the only places you can talk about intent and practice in art online are nontechnical spaces
>>3967204Yes, of fucking course. Why are you even asking?
>>3967209There are around 25 gear threads in the catalog.
>>3967210And 4 of them are for the exact same topic. What point are you trying to make here>>3967208We can make an effort for this to be more an artistic space than a technical (or consumerist) one. You've just gotta post photos and talk about them
>>3967208There are maybe 3 anons here who show any technical skill and enough pride in their work to not show garbage and make excuses for it.
>>3967200You could have posted a single post in one of those gearfaggotry threads instead of making a brand new one, fucking retard.
>>3967221>NOOOOO, DONT TALK ABOUT FAGGOTS MAKING MULTIPLE THREADS ON SAME TOPICS
>>3967224>hey fellas, I took some photos, sit back while I post them>hey fellas, I took some photos, sit back while I post them>hey fellas, I took some photos, sit back while I post themBecause the alternative is just soooo dynamic and interesting.
>>3967235taking photos lead taking better photos. Talking gear leads to nothing.
>>3967211>You've just gotta post photos and talk about themHylics can't do either.
>>3967238I'm not sure what you meant by this, but I assume it's a typo and you really intended to write a sentence that actually makes sense....????
Somebody make a thread about threads complaining about gearfag threads.
>paying over 150€ for f/1.1>paying over 300€ for 1600mmIdiots!
>>3967183What really bothers me is plain gearfaggotry. Gearfags are so lazy that they can't even google few photo samples from the nest to post along their gearfaggotry.
>>3967335I had this Kamlon in amazon basket today. After quick deliberation I pulled out on it. Should I still go for it?
>>3967378I remembered why I pulled out. 52mm thread.