Last thread hit bump limit: >>3952147News:>Samyang announced 12mm f2 AF lens for fuji X
How do I trick my brain into not caring about the looks of my camera body? I got the x-s10 and it's technically the best fuji camera I own. The new film simulations are beautiful. And I love shooting handheld video with the IBIS. And the grip is nice. But because the camera doesn't have the rangefinder look like x-pro and x-e cameras, I'm thinking about returning it. When picking up my x-pro1 it "feels"/looks so much better, which is stupid af because ergonomically the x-s10 feels nicer, and still I prefer holding the x-pro1. Help.
>>3956191what camera is this
>>3956191Why does the x100v lens produce soft corners?
>>3956293user error unfortunately
>>3956214take off all your clothes and stand in front of a mirror.stare at yourself. don't let your mind wander. just look at your body and all its flaws.this is the meat bag you're dragging around.do you think your little camera matters when this is what you're unleashing onto the world?no. not one bit.there you go. hope it helps!
>>3956191what the fuck is that retarded thing
>>3956214sorry can't help you faggot
>>3957138Leica M aesthetics, but with actual useful features and at a small fraction of the cost.
>>3957138It's a woman, anon.I take it you've never met one before.
>>3956191Is apd lens just a snake oil?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ7o19CdnxAWorth to get?
I got paid and will buy a new lens tomorrow. Still can't make my mind about Fuji XF35mm f/2, Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 or Viltrox 33mm f/1.4. All go for around the same price locally.XF33mm f/1.4 is way above my budget I'm afraid. Already have 18-55mm f/2.8-4 on my X-T20.
>>3957138X10 you dope[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width800Image Height658
>>3956191why in the fuck do you need auto focus at 12 mm holy shit
>>3957884Because AF sells lenses
>>3957832XF 35 1.4, don't get the viltroxs. Just be patient and wait for a good deal used.
>>3957903Found an XF35mm f/1.4 for about $310, lacks its box and warranty though. Brand new XF35 f2 goes for about $380 here.For reference, new 35mm 1.4 for $560 and 33mm 1.4 for $760. I guess the XF33mm is spectacular but it is just way too much money for me.
>>3957884because you can't sell a consumer camera with only manual focus in 2021
>>395795333mm is true 50mm fov. I'd go with vitrox to be honest.
Really not liking MF on the X-E2 with peaking. It’s like the peaking is too sensitive so I can’t be sure unless I magnify. My Sonys have had more reliable peaking. Might give the split focus a shot for a while
>>3958049I mean it's almost 9 years old and it was the mid-range model at the time. Maybe comparing it side by side with a modern sony isn't it bro>>3957953That sounds great to me, is it in good condition? Can you pay with PayPal? >>3957977I've seen you say this in a few places, why does a few mm matter so much to you? The only thing I can think of is if you've mainly shot 50mm for years and the slightly different fl is enough to trip you out every time you look at your photos, but even that would go away with time.
>>3958051>Maybe comparing it side by side with a modern sony isn't it broMy old NEX-3 had better peaking
>>3958051>That sounds great to me, is it in good condition? Can you pay with PayPal?I can buy through the websites own payment system that increases the cost by a 5%. Otherwise it's a craigslist like meet and pay system. The listing claims its like brand new, minus the packaging.
>>3957884fastest AF lens on the market. it doesn't even move!
>>3957903Isn't that lens a decade old?
Would you rather buy a x pro 2 for 700€ or a x pro 3 for 1200€?
>>3958150Lenses don’t age like digital bodies do. You won’t die if you have to wait 0.15 seconds longer for AF.
Is the new XF 33mm f/1.4 really any less magical than the old 35mm f/1.4?They're both obviously good lenses. If there's any difference in magic between the two I'm pretty sure it comes from the photographer, not the lens. I'm thinking of getting the newer just for the weather sealing.Pic related is one of the official sample images for the 33mm.
>>3958325Here's Leica's take on the same thing with the Summilux-TL, which we are to believe has five times the magic, but they went and wasted it on a snapshit.
I love the xtrans 2 raws, but the fucking bracketing dial is literally useless and I fucking hate changing iso with the menus. Is it worth selling my x-t10 and get an x-t1?
Good morning all.
I know Viltrox lenses aren't as good as Fuji ones but those prices are really attractive not gonna lie.Dissuade me from getting the 56/1.4 for $330 when Fuji's 50/2 costs 450, 56/1.2 $900 and 50/1 costs $1500. How bad could it be?
>>3958502ill dissuade you. get the ttartisans 50mm 1.2 for a third of the price of the viltrox. easy. or there are also tons of vintage 50mm lenses to adapt
>>3958503Not available in my country. 7artisans' 50mm/0.95 also seem like an interesting piece of equipment but not available either.
please advise on some nice mid focal length primes for my X-T4? which fujinon pancake prime will do me justice?
>>3958508The good ol' 35mm/f2
>>3958511honestly unsure between the xf18mm/f2 and the 27mm/f2.8 wr? I think if I got a 35 I would go for the f1.4, I don't know any good non fuji lenses with this mount but it would be nice to not have to use an adapter or use the default TC that fuji makes, I don't care too much for AF but there are Samyang lenses which support it. is the XF200mm OIS not amazing/magic? Fuji is really trying their best to bring new things
>>395850250 f2 is pretty amazing
>>3958512Voigtlander 35mm F1.2 Nokton X mount
>>3958515It is but it's $120 cheaper with an extra f-stop.
I'm a total beginner and want to buy fuji as my first camera (used), and with my limited budget (under 600 usd) I'm thinking to choose between x-t200 and x-t20. One question, why x-t200 price dropped so much despite it only being introduced in 2020? I even saw a used x-t20 body listed at higher price than used x-t200 body.
>>3958620Oh also, one more question. I see that x-t20 has no anti-alias (low-pass) filter. Does it really increase the sharpness (and I'm wondering if it's better)?
>>3958620>>3958623The X-T200 doesn't have the Xtrans sensor, instead having a boring old bayer CMOS sensor. Fuji nerds don't want anything that isn't Xtrans.The X-T2, X-T20 and X-E3 all have the same sensor (Xtrans 3) and photographic capabilities, I'd say buy whichever one is the cheapest, if image quality is the priority. If it isn't, pick the one with the features you want.IMO the previous generation Xtrans2 cameras render an image that's more to my liking. Check them out too, X-T1, X-T10, X-E2 and X-E2s are all still great.
>>3958507cant you buy it off ebay? there should be sellers from china that ship international, but not sure if they ship everywhere. also i think the 0.95 isnt as good
>>3958502The value equation shifts when you realize viltrox's are both harder to sell AND don't keep their value as well as Fuji lenses. If you treat your gear well, you could buy a used 35 f2 and sell it 2 years later for what you paid. I would always go with the Fuji option, unless you're looking at something special like the 18-300 tamron or the Laowa macro lens that was being talked about in the last thread.
>>3956191Why Fuji?What makes it special than other cameras?Please do tell.
>>3957884because f1.4 from 3 ft away requires constant focus adjustment on moving subjects, for example
>>3958746shit, f2 I mean
>>3958723They're fun to shoot. Get one. Or don't. We don't care either way lol
>>3958723For it was wanting a APS-C for light weight, and only Fuji is the only one that treats the format seriously rather than a stepping stone to fool frame.
>>3958623>has no anti-alias (low-pass) filter. Does it really increase the sharpness (and I'm wondering if it's better)?xtrans sensor means you don't need a low pass filter
>>3958746are you sure about that?
>>3958746oh im retarded you said FEET. fuck feet why would anyone feet anything
>>3958636>>3958770Thanks, I'll check it. Any affordable third party prime lenses that good for the money? Something like 35mm or 50mm. is Kamlan a good brand?
>>3958776oh, I also just noticed kamlan only has 21 f1.8 28mm f1.4 and 50mm f1.1 here. I'm looking a prime lense that will give good bokeh. should I pick 50mm one?
>>3958711the 18-300 tamron is such an interesting lens to me tho i don't doubt it's for people who just wanna take one lens everywhere
>>3958766fuji also treats it seriously and offers good range of lenses and doesn't cap features like canon and nikon do, their lenses aren't wallet removal like sony
>>3958671Can order one via amazon.com for $154 with customs & shipping included.I just don't know what to do with all these options. I kinda agree with >>3958711 as the Fuji lenses seem to retain their value real good, especially the older ones.Found a listing for 50mm/f2 for about $240, with its box and warranty. I like my 18-55 but borrowing my cousin's 35mm/f2 rather spoiled me for the sharpness and low light performance with its wider aperture is rather obvious.
>>3958777kamlan 50mm 1.1 both v1 and v2 has issues, i wouldnt get it. i would recommend ttartisans 50mm 1.2 and 7artisans 35mm 0.95. i have looked ay a fair bit of reviews for these too, and i have both. if you want wider, get pergear 25mm 1.8a thing about bokeh, its not just about the f stop. there are tons of lenses, vintage ones too that give amazing bokeh at 2 or 2.8, it's about the lighting too
>>3958788>i would recommend ttartisans 50mm 1.2 and 7artisans 35mm 0.95Oh yeah, those lenses are super popular here too, I'll look for those. Haven't heard about pergear, but I'm interested.>a thing about bokeh, its not just about the f stop. there are tons of lenses, vintage ones too that give amazing bokeh at 2 or 2.8, it's about the lighting tooThanks a lot for the info. What vintage lenses and what adapters do you recommend?
>>3958546Idk, never had viltrox 56, but fuji 50 f2 is near flawless performer. Not so long ago it was sharpest lens on a system. Already great at f2, and even better f2.8. 0 problems with CA, coma or distortion. You combine it with very small size, great build quality and weather sealing and it is lens that's hard to put down.
>>3958794You're really convincing me anon, especially now that I can get the lens for only $240 provided someone else doesn't grab it before I do. I can also get XF35 F1.4 for $310.It will be my first prime on X-T20.
>>3958799Go for it. It is a great lens, especially for that price!
>>3958789>what adaptersk&f concept adapter for any mount type to FX fuji mount, they are like 15 bucks and all metal>What vintage lensestoo many to name here, lots of zeiss, meyer-optik, nikkor. depends on your budget too. some good cheap ish ones are super takumar 50mm/1.4 and 55mm/1.8, nikkor 50mm 1.8 pancake, canon fd ssc lenses, zeiss biotar 58mm/2, etc. almost never get a wide/super wide vintage lens, most are terrible. lots of 55mm and 58mm are magical. the rabbit hole goes deep
>>3958766You give yourself away too easily
>>3958811How so? What do you mean?
>>3958808Sweet, thanks a lot for the recommendation.
>>3958794>that's hard to put down.I just can't imagine being that attached to a 76.5mm equivalent lens. It doesn't seem like a very versatile focal length.
how do you focus with an old lens on an X-Pro with the OVF ? there's no way you just eyeball it right ?
>>3958857The power of autism and lots of trial&error. Or you just switch into EVF.
>>3958857Use focus peaking through the EVF.
I found a listing for a fujifilm X-T1 with a bottom grip for 295 euro. Is this a good deal?I want a good camera for vintage lenses
>>3958860>>3958861wow okay, that's really annoying, maybe getting an X-E2s is a better idea
I wish I could into editing raws. I pretty much stopped taking raws and just solely get jpegs, which almost always look better and save me the trouble of sorting them out.
>>3958893With the X-Pro 2/3 you get a mini-EVF that you can pop up in the corner of the OVF to help with focusing.
>>3958911edit raws with camera
>>3958857Ive come into an xpro after shooting film rangefinders for years. I stopped trying to make the OVF work for me. The EVF with peaking is the best way to shoot the camera imo.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3958723fuji color science those film presets and the only people who really complain just can't make their RAW workflow any more intricate than "dump it in lightroom"
>>3958911I don't understand why someone would buy a Fooj if they're still going to be fucking with RAWs tbqh[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3959105Shooting experience, colour science.
>>3958808How about Zeiss Jena Flektogon wide lens 35mm F/2.8 M42?
>>3959105Mostly for the body shape/size and controls, for me. The jpeg output of the X-E2 is nothing special without Fuji lenses, and “color science” sounds like “blast processing.”
How does xf35mm f/1.4 perform on older cameras? Lots of people swear by how Fujifilm fixed the autofocus but what about those on the older cameras like X-T2?
>>3959105>I don't understand why someone would buy okay wormfag just learn to use other software before tossing the files in lightroom
>>3959230it was the first x-mount lens, so works the same from the very first x-trans camera.
>>3959129most old zeiss lenses are absolutely amazing, the flektogon would probably be the same. usually i google search the lens + "site:mflenses.com", that forum has tons of great advice and sample pics around vintage lenses. when i said wide/super wide lenses i meant < 20mm or <24mm, so 35mm is definitely finenever buy a vintage lens that has haze, fungus or separation (a little fungus may be ok ONLY IF you know how to clean it and remove it properly). make sure the aperture and focus ring arent too stiff and there isnt oil leaking from the aperture and you are good to go
Nervous first time poster. I just recently got into photography and went with an XE-1 and a 18-55mm lens and I'm just kinda lost on where to start. I shoot at my job and the local mountains and I'm trying to read some books but any recommendations are welcome.
>>3959393Start with basic exposure settings and the relationship between ISO/Aperture/Shutter speed.
Found a used X-T3 + 16-80mm with shutter count < 150 For 1100$. It will be my very first high end camera, is it a good dealor should I wait a bit longer ?
>>3959455Nah, it's pretty good. 1100 usd is a price for new xt3 without any lens, let alone 16-80
Bought a used xf35 f/1.4, the shutter speeds at 1.4 are insane
>>3958789fuji original m mount adaptercompatible lenses: https://fujifilm-x.com/global/support/compatibility/accessories/list-of-compatible-m-mount-lenses/
I've used a focal-reduced M42 Voigtländer 40 f/2 Ultron SL I for ten years. It broke.Adapt a M-mount 35mm f/2 Ultron II, get the native-mount 35mm f/1.2 Nokton, or some other option at around the same price-point?
I feel like X100V doesn't get enough attention. I've owned one for nine months now and I think it will be remembered as a modern classic.
>>3959726>I've owned one for nine months now and I think it will be remembered as a modern classic.Meh. A modern classic is ephemeral.
>>3959726tried one in Best Buy today and they have massively improved the fit and finish of that line since the first X100
>>3959837I think this is the biggest improvement yet. Feels much more serious than even the X100F. Apart from build quality, the lens is a huge improvement.
A few weeks ago I bought a second hand X-T2 for a really great price, I'm in love with it so far.Thanks to the 27mm pancake I can carry it in my backpack at all times for daily street photography. The 50mm f2 is great for portraits. I also have an adapted EF mount Samyang 135mm f2 from my previous astrophotography kit.I am thinking of selling the Samyang 135 and buying the Fuji 18-135 (450€) as a versatile lens for "general nature photography" (landscape is too big a word for what I do). Buying the 50-230 and a wide angle prime would probably offer a better value but after some recent outings I have developed an appreciation for the idea of not having to swap lenses.
>>3959862Bruh, samyang 135 is almost perfect optical performer. Why would you sell that and buy some mediocre super zoom?
>>3959886Don't get me wrong I love that lens, but having a limited budget for photography I also have to consider versatility, size and weight.
>>3959230It's just fine on the X-T2, love mine and never encountered any problems.>>3959862Don't buy the 18-135, I fell for the meme and now I spend my days perusing /fag/ dissuading others from making my mistake.
>>3959956Care to explain why?
>>3959991softest Fuji lens I've tested, feels cheap, AF could be better, etc. I'd save a bit more and get the Tamron 18-300 coming out soon.
Why do photo gear bluechecks hate the XF18/2, and how are they wrong?
>>3960022I've never tried it and it doesn't interest me but I've heard everything from 'worst fuji lens' to people loving it. Can someone give us a qrd on this little guy?
>>3960022I honestly have no qualms with mine. It's a small and fun lens.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3960099mind sharing pros/cons?
>>3960022an early reviewer poopoo'd it and its sentiment has been echoed and copied since then.
>>3960111Pros: it's small, it has a large aperture, it's sharp and contrastyCons: it feels cheap If you want a small wide angle lens, I don't think there are any other options. It's an F2 28mm equiv pancake. What's not to love?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3960118Many such cases.
>>3960144Is the photo you posted an example of its sharp and “contrasts” nature? Genuinely asking
>>3960022>XF18/2want this lens so badly, it seems fine asf it's more likely he just shit on it because there were less x mount cameras then
>>3960172It was just the first photo while scrolling through my phone that I knew was shot with the lens. That image was taken at 1/30 and F2, so no probably not all that sharp.I have no worries about printing 16x20 images using this lens though.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3959129that lens is beautiful
>be me>want to get a fuji camera and XF 35mm f/2 >most of all interested in the dials/button for a more manual experienceDoes the lack of buttons on an X-E4 really impact functionality? Is the X-T30 better for having more buttons? Is the new sensor and autofocus capability significantly better in the X-E4 compared to the X-T30? [The old X-T30]
>>3960280I think that it's two buttons less and one dial less. It should be manageable with lenses that have aperture rings, but it's not perfect.
>>3953420OP here, I ended up going to a store to try it hands-on and it was totally different from what I expected, I am very positively surprised. so I'll get either the XF35/2 or XF35/1.4
I want to get a fuji to be my take with me everywhere camera and for occasional paid photo/video work, and I'm not really sure what's worth investing in that wouldn't be money better spent on a full frame setup. highly considering an x-pro 2 off of ebay. what do?
>>3960280Buttons and dials are the reason I gravitated towards Fuji so I would, personally, get the X-T30 or the X-T2/3. Slightly better sensor and autofocus means little to me but I’m not everyone and your opinions could drastically differ from mine. >>3960368Glad you were pleasantly surprised, I think I was a bit confused because manual focus has been good enough for me but alls well that ends well. I’m a 35 f1.4 shill so naturally I’d go that way, but I understand it’s downsides and the f2 is the better option for some people. I’d try both if I could though, to make an informed decision but that’s not always easy so do your own research first. >>3960453What pulls you towards Fuji? If you’re not interested in manual controls and other things Fuji does well you might be better suited towards an XS10 or a compact Sony/Canon. You shouldn’t want to get a Fuji just because we circlejerk here, you should give us more information so we can help you make an informed decision. Fuji might end up being perfect for you, I’m just saying there’s a whole market of cameras that fits ‘everyday photo/video’ and could suit you better.
I bought a 50mm f1.0 for no discernable reason.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.0.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:11:04 12:52:54Exposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/1.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.6Brightness-2.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length16.00 mm
>>3960548And since I don't have actual people to take portraits of at the moment, here's a belated spooky robot.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.0.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:11:07 21:57:19Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness-0.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mm
>>3960548>>3960551What do you think of it so far?
Fuji X10 is all you need. Save your money. It's good enough for Daido Moriyama.
>>3960563It's soft at f1.0 and only starts getting sharp around f 2.8 but that's expected. It captures all the detail just fine wide open so upping the contrast during editing can counter it. It's REALLY large and heavy. Def not a travel or street kinda lens. It's still amazing for portraits and low light stuff.
>>3960568The bokeh looks pretty though. How is the AF? How does it compare to the 56/1.2?
>>3960569Yeah the bokeh is really smooth.The AF is hit and miss. For the amount of glass being moved, it isn't bad. Eye detect works well enough. Hell, it picked up the toy robot's eyes flawlessly so I can't complain. I know the focusing motor on the 50 f1.0 is newer than the one in the 56 f1.2, though it still isn't a linear motor. I'd still say the AF is good considering this lens is a monster. Maybe not good enough for anything fast like sports, street or wildlife but amazing for static subjects.
is a used x-t1 body worth to pick for 400 burger dollars?
>>3960678nope. xt2 minimum.
>>3960548I ordered 7artisans 50/0.95Will be interesting to compare after.
>>3960568Well that doesn't sound too hot compared to the 56/1.2 ...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelGFX 50RCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)13 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:11:06 11:28:26Exposure Time1/110 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness5.4 EVExposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3960571>The AF is hit and miss. For the amount of glass being moved, it isn't bad. Eye detect works well enough. Hell, it picked up the toy robot's eyes flawlessly so I can't complain.It just sounds worse and worse ... how much did you pay for it?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelGFX 50RCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)13 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:11:06 11:27:24Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.0Brightness7.9 EVExposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3960686How much does it cost in your country usually? Pre-owned ofc
>>3959862That samyang and the 85mm (which i took these pics with) are some of the sharpest glass out there, save up till you can get the zoom![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3960698>>3960700Not really. Depends on what you need it for. For portraits it's amazing. The bokeh is really unparalleled. I paid over 2000 canuck bucks for it but that's because I bought it brand new. Honestly if you just need a versatile all rounder 50mm lens, get the F2. It's amazing for its value and will do adequately for everything. The F1.0 is niche af, which you can interpret as bad or not worth it. I'm liking mine so far. I'm sure buyer's remorse will hit me at some point but I'm gonna enjoy the lens until then.
What would you /fag/gots get for a portrait + general purpose tele combo?>56mm f/1.2 + 70-300mm f/4-5.6+ cheaper+ lighter, especially when only using the 56mm+ can use the 56mm without bringing the 70-300mm+ 2½ brighter at 56mm, but only at 56mm- big gaps in focal lengths- darker except at 56mm- no weather sealing for the 56mm>50-140mm f/2.8 + 2x teleconverter+ covers more focal lengths+ brighter across more focal lengths+ has a tripod foot+ always weather sealed- 2½ stops darker at 56mm- more expensive- heavier, also at 56mm- must always bring 50-140mm- IQ penalty between 140mm and 280mm
I have the X-T3 with the XF56mmF1.2. What second lens should I get for my trip to the Normandy soon?What do you think of the XF16mmF1.4? Is it as magical as anyone says? My only worry is that I don't have so many usecase for that wide angle. New 33mm looks good too but maybe too close to the 56mm?
Every time I use the self timer my xt30 takes a 5 picture burst, why does this happen bros?
>>3961838Ignore me I'm retarded, I had the dial set to burst which carries over to timer apparently. Setting it back to single shot works
>>3961705get the viltrox 23 1.4.The new fuji 23 1.4 wr is great but its been delayed.
>>3960453If you’re using off camera lighting some wireless triggers block the shutter/ISO dial which sucks and makes me think it was designed for Le epic street photographers rather than more conventional working pro/semi pro types. I really like my xpro2 but it’s a meme camera in some ways. An XT2 with battery grip or XH1 might be a better idea if you definitely want to get a fuji with that sensor generation.
Is this thread already at the bump limit? What’s the limit for /p/?
>>3962177nope. limit is 310 posts or 150 images
>>3958857The X-pro3 shows you the focusing point you've selected in a corner of the OVF, it works very well.
I took some pics recently of my figma waifu... Because it's been difficult to go out much.
I'm fairly happy with the kit lens ability to do figures and was happily surprised
I posted earlier about wanting a 23mm pancake prime and the 35mm macro but I'm able to do enough with the current lenses
The 7artisans 35/1.2 is real nice.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-E2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Macintosh)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:11:11 22:41:33Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness2.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3182Image Height2121RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>3952166I ended up going with the 35mm f/1.4Here's a quick shot, didn't have time to set up a nice background. The longitudinal chromatic aberration is more noticeable on the whiskers than I had hoped. But I think I can live with it if I remind myself not to pixel peep. Other than that I really like the look.Shame about the lack of WR, but I didn't see myself using this particular lens much in bad weather anyway, so I think I can live with that too.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareCapture One 21 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/280 secF-Numberf/1.4Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/1.4Brightness3.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmImage Width1500Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3962369meant to quote>>3952166
>>3961705Just get the good old 18-55, or the much more expensive 16-55 though it's pretty big to carry around. I find my 18-55 really handy when going around and while portraits etc. aren't as sharp as my 35/f1.4, it's extremely versatile.
>>3958512> is the XF200mm OIS not amazing/magic?From what I can tell it's a well-built tele prime for sports photographers, but certainly nothing out of the ordinary, at least not at this price[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
I've been eyeing the X100v but also have an XT3 that I could just buy a 23mm prime for. Am I missing anything if I don't go the X100v route?
>>3961661Never use th 2x teleconverter, get the 1.4x insteadThe 50-140mm is a limited-purpose lens for>lanscape>events>portraits when you have limited control over the environment (i.e. non-studio)I wouldn't use it for most other things but for the purposes listed above, I probably wouldn't get any other lens than this one. If you know you will need a telezoom but don't know yet what you're going to shoot, this is your lens.
>>3962575not really, you could also get an X-T30 that is the same size or even smaller than the X100V that still has interchangable lenses. the X100 is made solely for the "limitation breeds creativity" people but it's too expensive and not compact enough to justify it in my opinion, especially if you already have an X-T3.
>>3962583thanks anon you fixed my fomo
I wanna get into street photography, I get plenty to shoot at but I find the idea of shooting random people on the street rather unnerving. I should have gotten a telephoto lens to shoot folks from a distance.>>3962575Why even bother, get that 23mm/f2 and you'll be set.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T20Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 22.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)53 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height6000Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:11:13 21:35:12Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness1.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3134Image Height4701RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3962661after living in a city for ten years I’ve lost all desire to shoot street. But there’s plenty of other photos to be made
>>3954211It matches my https://lens-db.com/cosina-voigtlander-ultron-40mm-f2-aspherical-sl-2002/ perfectly, which is 63.5mm in diameter.
What makes the XF35mm/1.4 special as many claim?
>>3962698Smol boiGood enough (and some) More reminiscent of legacy lensesCheaper than the 33I do like my 33 1.4 though and am not sure I'd leave it for the 35 even if its smaller
>>3962577>Never use th 2x teleconverter, get the 1.4x insteadToo big of a hit on image quality, then?I looked through my pictures from before I switched to Fuji, filtered on focal lengths greater than 196mm, and there weren't many that were all that important to me. Some birds and other wildlife, but I don't really have the patience to take wildlife photography seriously. There are some landscapes as well, but most of them would have benefited from both being wider, and from having the kind of image quality you get with the 50-140mm. The same can honestly also be said for stuff I've shot between 140mm and 196mm. I always wanted more reach, but did much better work at the short telephoto end.Also some of my favorite photos are landscape and architecture between 50 and 55mm. I didn't have anything between the kit 18-55mm and a 70-300mm, but I think I think that would have come in handy.Seems like a pretty strong case for the 50-140mm, and when bundled with the 1.4x TC (or skipping the TC) it brings the price down to less than the 56mm + 70-300mm combo.
Any Viltrox users here? 56mm 1.4 and 85mm 1.8 look compelling at their price points.
What's your favourite film sim/recipe for shitty, British, cloudy weather? I normally spend most of winter in monochrome but would like to embrace the softly lit dreariness this year.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.9Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:08:05 18:00:45Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias1/3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1086Image Height724RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3963143Try doing some night photography around pretty colourful lights, but keep the dark truly dark.
>>3963149Not him but what settings are the most suitable? I'm pretty clueless[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
Why does my X-E2's sensor do this with rock formations? This is with the 7artisans 35/1.2 at f/5.6-f/8, but it did something similar with the 7a 35/1.4. JPEG, no post-sharpening. Sharpness and NR at 0 in in-camera settings. Sharpening the jpeg in LR brings out the wormjis.
>>3963404raw version of the same capture sharpened in LR.
>>3963404I found the same using it in the woods. Ended up selling it in the end as zoomed in they looked like shit in certain circumstances.
>>3963459I wonder if that’s caused by the noise reduction. Maybe I’ll try it on -2.And I wonder if other X-Trans 2 or 3 cameras do this.
>>3963553OK, this is known as the “watercolor” issue. It seems using Photo | Enhance in LR helps a lot with this. It’s not perfect, but it’s good enough that I don’t feel like selling the camera anymore.
>>3956191>>Samyang announced 12mm f2 AF lens for fuji X>Focus by wire>Good luck trying to focus it under star light
>>3963404You fell for the Fuji meme, just sell it and get a Sony
>>3963590I have a Sony, and Sony doesn’t offer a body shaped like an X-Pro or X-E series. The A7C is a sad, fat mutant, as are the recent APSC bodies. I just want to larp with a brick camera with small lenses in peace.
I have just started using Capture One to edit photos taken with my X-T2. If I zoom in on my images I can see this weird pattern. What's going on?
>>3963631You might have worms
>>3963631https://petapixel.com/2017/02/23/fuji-cameras-produce-strange-purple-flaregrid-artifact/Nevermind, a quick google search answered my question. I'll be more careful shooting backlit subjects.
>>3957834Why don't you buy a Canon, sweetie?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 80DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 12.3 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:07:08 14:11:46Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/10.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
I'm no prime snob, but sometimes it's nice to not have the big honker on the front of the camera, particularly for travel and blending into crowds.I have a 35mm f1.4 but need something wider to go with it. Would you go with the 23mm f2 or the 18mm f2? I have a lot of travel photography shot at both of those focal lengths with a zoom, so either would be used extensively.The 18mm is nice for this use case because it's a pancake. But the 23mm is weather sealed, which comes in handy when visiting rainy places. On the other hand you can crop a picture taken with the 18mm to 23mm, but you can't reverse it from 23mm to 18mm.Another pancake is the 27mm f2.8 which is weather sealed, but it feels awfully close to 35mm, so it doesn't bring that much else to the table.
>>3963902There is a big difference between 18mm and 23mm focal length, but both are easy to compose with. 18mm is the typical smartphone view but it's also a very old lens and from what I read it's slowish and noisy. The 23mm is newer, very fast and quiet.. plus WR. I wish they would bring a second gen of the 18mm F2 with WR and fast AF. Would be an instant buy for me. Do you keep your 35mm? If not then I would go with the 23mm. If you keep it give the 18mm a try.. maybe buy used and sell again if you don't get warm with it. If you want wider but with WR, fast and quiet.. then maybe the 16mm f2.8 would be an option too. But 16mm is another story.. way more difficult to compose
How many Fuji X lenses do you own? I'm planning my next purchases trying to keep that number as small as possible. I want to shoot landscape and some portraits.- a walkaround lens (either 18mm or 27mm)- a portrait lens (50mm f2)- a telephoto zoom (50-230)- a wide angle lens for landscape - but which one? The 10-24 seems like the obvious choice but maybe a 12mm prime alone would be sufficient, leaving more money in my pocket to travel to nice locations.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T2Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T2 Ver4.40Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:11:06 08:34:18Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness2.0 EVExposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>>3964086Mine right nowXF56mmF1.27artisans 24mm f1.8Probably gonna get either the new 23mm F1.4 or the 33mm F1.4
>>3964086Samyang 12mm f/2.0XF16-80mmF4.0XF18-55mmF2.8-4.0XF35mmF1.4XF56mmF1.2Trying to decide between XF50-140F2.8, XF70-300F4.0-5.6, or XF100-400F4.5-5.6 next. I want to shoot sharp images of wildlife big and small.
>>3964183Oh and I forgot the XF27mmF2.8 because it's glued on my X-E2S
>>3962353The 35/1.2 was the first lens I ever bought for my X-Pro2; it's got nice character, though definitely not without its faults.
does anyone have any sort of clue as to what the Internal Cut Filter Transmission graph looks like on the X-Trans 4 ? or maybe anyone has any experience with IR filters on this sensor ? same questions about X-Trans 2.trying to figure out what kind of IR filter I should get for my X-S10 and X-E2s.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution400 dpiVertical Resolution400 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3963789I really wanna sell my Fuji for an R6 but no one will buy it.
Question from a photography noob: why is Fuji the only brand that gets its own appreciation thread? Are they undervalued? Do they do something special?
>>3964707Because they have some quirky ways of doing things relative to other manufacturers, and so they attract trolls around here, so there’s more of an impulse to circle the wagons.
>>3964707The cameras themselves are FUN and interesting so the owners are enthusiastic. Anyone is welcome to make an appreciation thread for their manufacturer of choice.
I’m shooting an x100v and somewhat new to this. If I want something completely sharp across the frame (no bokeh), I know I should stop down to f8 or f11, but what other settings will I need to change?
>>3964773I think you mean to have everything in focus (which means no bokeh) rather than completely sharp (sharp images refer to how 'clear' it is to see detail). Look up hyperfocal distances calculators. Essentially you want as much of what you are photographing to be as similar distance to the camera as possible, while being stupid something like f5. 6 or f8 (f11 introduces diffraction and will lower the sharpness a little, but you can use it). Like, if you are taking a photo of a wall, it's flat and will be the same distance to the camera so nothing will be out of focus. That's different if you were in a forest, where the ground can be 1m from your camera, and trees will be at lots of different distances so some parts will be out of focus
Thinking about getting a X100V.I'm looking for the vintage rangefinder experience, ideally 50mm equivalent, but 35mm is fine too.I mostly do street, documentary style photo, so I want something pretty compact as well. Any thoughts on this, are there better options than the x100v?
>>3964764I didn't even want this appreciation thread for this manufacturer. Showing appreciation would be better done with photo threads where the person used their preferred equipment and showed what they can do with it, instead of thist. fellow Fuji shooter
>>3964707It's the same people that make every thread and talk in every thread.
>>3964895>Showing appreciation would be better done with photo threads where the person used their preferred equipment and showed what they can do with itlike flickr groups?https://www.flickr.com/search/groups/?text=fujinon
>>3964909but on flickr people just post photos and don't talk too much
>>3964895No one cares about you though ¿por que no los dos?
>>3964874Build quality is terrible, don't bother. Get a sony or a nikon
>>3964912We don't much have los dos, do we now?>>3964909>>3964911Somewhere between then. Posting photos and talking; not just posting photos, not just talking
>>3964929The build on the V is actually quite good
I currently own a silver xt4. Planning to buy a x100v.Should I get a silver one or a black one?
>>3965396Whichever makes you most excited to go shooting.
>>3965396Hmm personally I would have gone black xt4 and silver x100v! However... Hmm! They both look great. Like the other anon said, pick what excites you to pick it up and go out to use it.
>>3965399>>3965467Got the silver one lads. Cheers.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G981WCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.0.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:11:22 16:09:34Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness-3.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.90 mm
>>3965396Black 100%. They both feel like plastic but the black at least doesn’t also look like plastic.
>>3965396>Should I get a silver one or a black one?Black seems to generally have a higher resale value for whatever reason.
>>3966763Better plastics. I heard that somewhere. Apparently silver models are cheaper to make. This goes across all the brands.
finally joined the /fag/ (Fuji Appreciating Gents), gonna save up for the 18/2 and 35/1.4 now (or maybe the 27/2.8 R instead of the 18mm but I'm afraid it's too close to the 35mm)
I currently have a xt20 with the 18-55.I'm never taking it because it's too big for the pocket in my coat. Should I get the 27mm pancake or something like the X70 second hand?
>>3966849That depends, do you want to shoot GOAT 40mm or ho-hum 28mm equivalent?
>>3966849What I did was pickup the x-e2s cheaply second hand and. Xf27mmf2.8 (pancake) for a pocketable setup. That way you can use it with any of your x mount lenses if you ever want to take a second body for a shoot. The x70 looks awesome too.However, in this situation you should just take your xt20 with the kit lens. Get a sling bag or something and take it.
>>3966849Seconding the advice to get the 27mm. Any of the fuji compact primes should be a good fit though. I have the 23mm because I like the 35mm equivalent.
>>3966877Not sure yet, I need to look at more pictures. X70 would be better for casual pictures between friends, restaurants etc. thanks to the wider angle.27mm would be better for general purpose and street though...>>3966911>>3966925X70 looks comfy because you can really just put it in a pocket. I usually take the xt20 + 18-55 in a little bag when I go on holidays or events, but these days Im just studying a lot at the library and my backpack is already heavy so Ive been thinking more of the pancake that I can just put in my jacket.Anyway is 200 euros fine for a second hand 1st gen xf27 f2.8? That's the price around my area
>>3967018I paid $200 CAD for a used xf27. The X-E2S w/ pancake fits in /most/ of my pockets.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareCapture One 21 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)84 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness1.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length56.00 mmImage Width3120Image Height1755RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3967096Nice, almost the same size as xt20. I'll wait a bit more for the prices to drop and will probably buy this lens.How do you like it so far ? Is this focal length good for most situations?
Xt100 with XC 50 -230[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3068Image Height2045Image Created2021:11:25 09:07:34
>>3965396how are you liking having both? I have an x-t4 that I use for video work and occasionally photos but I feel like I would enjoy going out and taking photos more with an x100v.
I just ordered an X-E4 [body only] and 35mm f/2Is the kit lens the best relatively cheap video lens?What is another prime that /p/ would recommend? I would like to stick to small primes to keep the overall kit light and small. I have a full frame Canon setup for big dikk bokeh stuff.
>>3967126I am loving the feel and handling of the x100v. Makes you want to take it everywhere and take pictures without thinking too much. I feel like I have to try harder when I use the xt4. It's more suited to professional shooting, whereas the x100v feels much more casual, which is really good for street and candid stuff.
I know it's shit but is anyone still using the S5 Pro ? I'm wondering if it'd be a fun body to shoot with F mount lenses, if I can't find a film body. It's <120€ as well.
>>3967101I find 35mm focal length on a crop a little bit tight for many close up situations, but I like tight. 27mm (41mm FF equivalent) is a good length for me.
What brand of UV/protective filters would you guys recommend?
>>3967287A lens hood.
I want to buy an X100 but can't decide if it's worth spending £1000 on the V or just getting a F or T. There's a X100T on Facebook marketplace for £300 which seeems like a good deal. What will I be missing out on? I don't care about weather sealing but will pay the extra £700 if it's worth my while. Pls advise. Please see attached pup for payment.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 12 ProCamera Software15.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:11:08 17:44:44Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1250Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness-1.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3967736The X100, S, T and F all have the same f2 lens. It's kind of soft wide open but if that's not a big deal to you, go for one of the older ones.
alright fellow losers, I just ordered the X-mount Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 on sale during Black Friday.Who knows when it'll actually arrive.That is all.
>>3967781If you dont post mini review u r fagget
Should I buy the XF16mmF1.4 with that 100€ cashback? 750€ is still a hell lot of money. Could also buy a Ricoh GRIII for that cash.
>>3967868you're a meme
>>3967875Depends. Do you need fast wide angle?
>>3967875Adapt vintage glass, xf18 f2 also exists
>>3967875Ttartisan 17mm f/1.4
>>3967786definitely. At the very least, I'll try to show the information that I wanted to see in the available reviews (which are too few and far between), but which I felt was missing.
>>3967881May be a good companion to my xf50mm.>>3967883>>3967889I also have a 7artisans 25mm but I'm not so happy about its sharpness. Also I kinda prefer autofocus instead manual.
>>3967900The 7a 25mm seems to be the dog of the lineup. All of the chinesium 25mm lenses seem to suck relative to the other FLs available
Is it possible to draw your finger on the LCD screen with a Fuji camera while looking in the EVF in order to choose the place you want to focus?Or is it only possible by using the joystick?I can't seem to do this having just bought an X-E4 and I'm wonder if it is even possible to drag your finger like that(?)
>>3964086XF16mmF1.4XF23mmF2.0Viltrox 33mmF1.4XF56mmF1.2Viltrox 85mmF1.8XF18-55F2.8-F4I'd go with the 12mm prime for landscape.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T4Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 4.1 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:02:18 20:22:53Exposure Time4 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness-1.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1254Image Height627RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3964086Only a 16mm 1.4 and a 50mm 1.0 at the moment. And if it counts, the 23mm lens on the x100v
>>3964086XF16-80mmF4XF35mmF1.4XF8-16mmF2.8Need some time recovering financially from the last one, but I might get the XF50-140mmF2.8 next.
When will this lens shortage madness end in Europe
>>3967976You can on the Xt-4 I think
>>3969098Awesome photo anon, it's inspiring me
>>3964086>23mm f/2>35mm f/1.4>50 f/2I want to get the 10-24mm (or Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 if that comes to X-mount) and I'm thinking of selling my 23 f/2 to fund itEventually I also want to get a telephoto zoom like the 70-300mm
>>3969261>>3967976Try setting the touch control to AF (pic related) It works on x100v, but I can't get it to work on my Xt4[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G981WCamera SoftwareG981WVLS2DUI5Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1816Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:12:01 08:15:43Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4032Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDR12QSMF00VMImage Height1816Brightness1.5 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time16/625 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating250Image Width4032Focal Length5.40 mmMetering ModeSpotScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
Brand new x100v, first time fuji user[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100VCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.12Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:12:02 14:44:35Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness2.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6240Image Height4160RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusOKChroma SaturationUnknownContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
>>3969807[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100VCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.12Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:12:02 14:45:22Exposure Time1/38 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness1.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6240Image Height4160RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownBlur StatusBlur WarningChroma SaturationNormalContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffAuto Exposure StatusOKFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoFocus StatusOKPicture ModeAperture Prior AESharpnessNormalSlow Synchro ModeOffWhite BalanceAuto
>>3969807>>3969808Do you use Gimp for processing?Nice photos, have fun with the camera
>>3969868Thanks, I just used gimp to resize.I usually edit with rawtherapee, and then gimp if I need to remove ugly shit like cables etc.But I'm thinking of trying lightroom now, I've been going the poorfag way for too long with free software and old nikon dslr with kit lens.
>>3958493what kind of gear are you using
Eurobros, is Capture One Pro worth it for 170€? How often does it get discounted and can I hope to score a lower price within the next few months?
>>3969974I just DL a pirated version.
>>3969974use rutracker to torrent it, it's the only public tracker that I trust to download software from since it's so well moderated
thoughts on the x-t30? it's way over priced at the moment but I've been waiting for a year and it's only been getting more expensiveis there another older fuji camera that I should consider that would have most of the modern film simulations?
>>3970028>older camera>most of the modern film simulationsI guess you know the answerWhich ones are you after specifically? I rarely use them; the X-T20 already offers all the ones I would have ever wanted to use except for Eterna
>>3970118>Which ones are you after specifically?I don't know really, just all the most common ones so I can use recipes I find on the internet. Also fear of missing out.I have no interest in editing, everything will be SOOC for meby "older" I meant something like the x100t and x100f which are both cheaper second hand than a brand new xt30
>>3969978>>3970023What am I missing out on as a casual if I still with C1 Express over Pro?
>>3970601https://rutracker.org/forum/tracker.php?nm=capture%20onewho cares, just get pro and don't pay anything
Is the X100V good for low light?
How's ttartisan 50mm f1.2? Got 35mm f1.4 but i got the feeling that it's a fun little toy for $88
>>3970601Adobe bridge with camera raw
>>397165850mm's are all at least decent. It's 25mm's that are mostly bad.
Have any of you tried DXO Photolab5? it supports x-trans now
>>3970191The good ones (imo) are Classic Chromium, Eterna, Acros and Provia. The X-T20 will already give you all of those except Eterna, for which you will have to get a camera from 2020 or later
Is a Fuji XQ1 for 50 euros worth it? I've been looking for a pocketable camera, found this deal on a local marketplace
>>3956191I’m a biological spam bot also known as a fag I’m gonna put some ventilation in my skill with a 50 caliber Deagle