[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 43 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Happy 18th Birthday, 4chan!

Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


Discuss and post mf pics, 645 to 6x9 (polaroid is good too)

I just finished a roll of portra 160 today, might pop a delta 3200 in my P6 soon because the winter darkness is approaching quickly.
>>
>>3948297
I'm pretty sure the photo of the viewfinder looks better than the photo itself
>>
>>3948302
Don't let the secret get out anon.
>>
>>3948306
/p/ is already a Christian board, anon. Go to /tv/ if you want to save souls.
>>
>>3948302
Looking through the viewfinder i person looks the best. This is the woe of the mediun format shooter.
>>
File: camera.jpg (1.12 MB, 1600x1200)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB JPG
I fucking love to shoot with my medium format camera. picrel is a picture related of me holding my old Fuji which I call picrel because it reminds me of a picrel so I named it that name. What's your favorite film simulation? Don't be a filthy kike jew spic motherfucker and say you chinks don't like sims!
>>
>>3948411
holy shit this was such an awesomely powerful post and such a valuable contribution to our community...... the other retards on here can learn so much from your amazing insights and compassion, we can all tell it's obvious you are fully secure in your self and confident and just godlike in your truly stunning wisdom about all things photo related, i wouldn't even limit your glory to just pictures either, you are the best there has ever been at anything and i love you with all my heart ooga booga nigger
>>
File: saz1.jpg (1.12 MB, 1844x2768)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB JPG
ok

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>3948417
mittelformatman
>>
>>3948417
>shooting anything other than 6x6 or 6x7
disgusting, that shit looks like the usual 16:9 snapshit from a smartphone bleah
>>
>>3948526
>Certain combinations of horizontal and vertical units of measurements exclude a photo from being good
You sound like the sort of person who goes round taking medium format photos of gas stations and road signs
>>
File: 09.jpg (81 KB, 1000x1000)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
6x6 best format
>>
>>3948533
on the other hand you look like a smartphone snapshitter who just got handed a medium format camera and has no frame of reference other than his 16:9 DoFless garbage
>>
File: filthy casual.jpg (47 KB, 625x417)
47 KB
47 KB JPG
>>3948554
Explain why 16:9 photos are garbage without resorting to mindless format elitism as you have been so far.
>>
>>3948554
Dofless? If anything small sensors have the biggest depth of field
>>
>>3948526
Are you blind? That's obviously a 3:2 aspect ratio.
>>
>>3948502
>>3948526
>>3948612
it's a 6x9, so yeah 3:2
>>
>>3948652
Ich nicht sagt das ist ein 16:9 fotografie
>>
>>3948655
my mistake, i thought you were saying it wasn't a MF photo and was taken on 35mm
>>
>>3948302
nah
>>
>>3948664
holy shit that looks bad. either trolling or retarded. why do you continue?
>>
>>3948664
I like your photo :)
>>
>>3948737
Explain why it looks bad
>>
>>3948560
>t. Can’t seperate subject
Exactly, all the dof isn’t something to brag about
>>
>>3948839
If you are relying on shallow dof to separate your subject and then trying to tell people what to do, you are a hypocrite
>>
>>3948533
lol /p/ in a nutshell: shots of their fucking cat, random signs, sometimes scrubby ass trees. doesn't matter what format it's always this shit. why are these people even here?
>>
>>3948774
The 1/2 of the picture that isn't covered with something that looks like a bad exposure / hole in camera / light intrusion looks not bad.
>>
>>3948923
Its flare from the low sun, and i dont see how it makes the image "bad", its just an imperfection.
>>
>>3948926
my grandma took better pictures with a disposable camera you hack. if you can't see how obviously shit this is you're hopeless
>>
>>3948926
It's an imperfection I would not want in any kind of picture
>>
>>3948297
Dog is shite, car one is pretty pleasing, though.
>>
>>3948302
it's a gimmick just like pic related, a compositional crutch for people who can't frame a photo so they use an artificial frame.
>>
>>3948935
>>3948992
assmads
>>3949015
Dog is love
>>
>>3949082
Can you show another picture which is not with sunflares and not through the viewfinder?
>>
File: Photo11_12_s.jpg (3.32 MB, 1500x1500)
3.32 MB
3.32 MB JPG
>>3949093
I don't see why that would make the assmads any less assmad but ok

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width2910
Image Height2898
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2021:10:08 21:54:09
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1500
Image Height1500
>>
>>3949096
Everyone is dragging you stop projecting.
>>
>>3949106
Huh?
>>
>>3949130
Everyone is dragging your garbage and you’re cope is that somehow this makes someone mad.
>>
>>3949139
>im not mad, you are mad!!!!!!!!!!
Projecting projection? I don't know where you're getting at. I'm the only one posting pics here lol.
>>
>>3949160
>Everyone is dragging your garbage and you’re cope is that somehow this makes someone mad.
>>
>>3949163
Repeating your statement does what exactly? Post some medium format shit lmao
>>
>>3949096
bro this shit is flatter than a pancake with boring colors and rushed composition. for the love of god properly learn photoshop or at least shoot monochrome if you only have access to such depressing subjects.
this pic is indistinguishable from a smartphone snapshit except for the level of detail, at least learn to shoot properly with your medium format camera otherwise just use your phone instead of wasting money to get the same results
>>
File: Photo05_5(2)-01.jpg (4.52 MB, 2910x2898)
4.52 MB
4.52 MB JPG
>>3949173
It's almost as if sensor size doesnt matter, hmm.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2021:10:09 00:57:08
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2910
Image Height2898
>>
>>3949176
sensor size matters immensely, it’s just that terrible snapshitters like you don’t know what to do with it.

also you already photographed that subject with a digital camera months ago and it looked like shit. glad to see that using an analog camera taught you nothing
>>
>>3949184
Holy shit you save my pictures????
Schizo alert!
>>
>>3949169
hello, i would like to calmly state that this is a shit photo and calmly move on with my day. the contrast is poor and color is off. composition sucks, there is a ton of green sky and no room around the subject except for literal garbage cluttering up the background, it looks like you were just trying to sell this pos in a snapshot and hide that it doesn't run from the buyer you wanted to scam. the horizon isn't level, i can go on but i hope that you get the point and stop shitting up this board with your waste of film "photos"
>>
>>3949173
Any new phone has this level of detail.
>>
look at all these nophoto losers, shitting on this guys photos but i bet they havent touched a camera in months lmao
>>
>>3948297
This is your brain on medium format superiority delusion.

Just because your neg is big doesn't mean it's a good photo. Also you don't need 3200 iso film for the middle of the day in winter. Unless you live in Alaska in which case I'll allow it.

Practice more and stop viciously defending your work just because you spent money on 120 film and a good camera.
>>
File: foma400-6400rodinal.jpg (2.06 MB, 2000x2000)
2.06 MB
2.06 MB JPG
>>3949539
>Also you don't need 3200 iso film for the middle of the day in winter
I've had to push past it on especially dark and cloudy days and under the canopy. Throw in a filter and things go fucky wucky.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 10.2.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution1152 dpi
Vertical Resolution1152 dpi
Image Width2000
Image Height2000
>>
>>3949231
/p/ is a small board I remember that photo as well
>>
>>3949539
Who said he has a good camera?
>>
>>3949573
this, lol

>>3949569
remembering is one thing, saving it and keeping it around is another thing
>>
>>3949636
>saving it and keeping it around is another thing
listen here you snapshitting nigger, I have it because you asked in a thread for us to edit it, so of course I’m gonna remember something I personally dealt with.
>>
>>3949641
Lmao clean up ur fuckin pc
>>
>>3949649
>pc
ngmi
>>
>>3949184
bokeh is a crutch and if u dont stop down ur a noob
>>
>>3949184
>sensor size matters immensely
it only matters to pixel peepers and spec sheet sniffers
virtually irrelevant for the overwhelming majority of photography
>>
>>3950623
What cope level is this?
>>
>>3950674
Its a based fact
>>
>>3948297
looks like shit
>>3948411
looks like shit
>>3948559
looks like shit
>>3949020
looks like shit
>>
File: Tree, fp4-2.jpg (4.54 MB, 3890x4165)
4.54 MB
4.54 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern574
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution1600 dpi
Image Created2021:10:03 17:34:13
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3950786
Now that's texture, bet that'd look good printed on a wall.
>>
>>3948664
What happened to the scan wtf is that light
>>
>>3950852
Ask the lab, that light is a lens flare though.
>>
>>3950854
This is lens flare? Looks superficial like it's on top of the film neg.
>>
>>3950855
Yea the front element sits pretty far in so the lens kinda has a really shitty short lens hood "built in"
>>
>>3950857
So how would you mitigate this? Filter? Actual hood?
>>
>>3950858
actual hood, but i don't really care
>>
>>3950623
>virtually irrelevant for the overwhelming majority of photography
imagine being so retarded that you think that when people talk about the importance of sensor size they mean that bigger = better.
that's why you'll always be a loser
>>
>>3950888
Thats kinda what majority of /pee/ talks about though so its difficult not to have some sort of prejudice. Do explain how it makes a difference for the vast majority of photographers, aka hobbyists.

Being a gearfag is a valid explanation btw just saying.
>>
File: 000016160006.jpg (684 KB, 4824x3533)
684 KB
684 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:10:14 18:39:39
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>3951005
mmmmm smoof
>>
>>3950896
>some sort of prejudice
says the nigger who is >>3950857 white?
>>
>>3951237
Gottem lol
>>
>>3949020
Those are all superimposed pictures ontop of the phone. Good luck doing that irl.
>>
can you faggots please post photos
ON FUCKING /P/HOTOGRAPHEI

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1280
Image Height1732
>>
File: foma400-1600rodinal 5.jpg (1.14 MB, 2000x2000)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB JPG
>>3952830
Nay.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCapture One 10.2.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution1152 dpi
Vertical Resolution1152 dpi
Image Width2000
Image Height2000
>>
>>3952832
thx
>>
File: Studio Cameron, fp4-2.jpg (3.06 MB, 2633x2633)
3.06 MB
3.06 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern574
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution1600 dpi
Image Created2021:10:03 17:27:52
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: Portra 160 - 0034.jpg (723 KB, 1100x815)
723 KB
723 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelHP Scanjet G4050
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 12.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:10:21 00:13:27
Color Space InformationsRGB
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
>>
File: m645.jpg (1.37 MB, 2000x1483)
1.37 MB
1.37 MB JPG
Bought an M645. From the first roll, still not used to it.
>>
File: santa fe, ektar-9.jpg (4.84 MB, 3593x3604)
4.84 MB
4.84 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern574
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution1600 dpi
Image Created2021:10:21 18:20:58
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3953857
>>3954045
awful. hope this was ur first roll or something
>>
>>3954047
show us your work
>>
File: IMG_20211023_210517.jpg (1.24 MB, 3000x4000)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
Trying out cyanotypes
Prints getting too overexposed..
Iam too tarded for logical thinking..
I need less exposure with the UV lamp right ?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHUAWEI
Camera ModelJNY-LX1
Camera SoftwareJNY-L21 10.1.0.353(C432E1R2P1)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3000
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:10:23 21:05:17
Exposure Time1/25 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.75 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3000
Image Height4000
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3954664
Go for it, experimentation and failure is the key to learning.





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.