[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 15 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


How to have lighting like this in my day light shots

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution144 dpi
Vertical Resolution144 dpi
Image Width750
Image Height936
>>
More reference, thanks for any tips and tricks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution144 dpi
Vertical Resolution144 dpi
Image Width750
Image Height942
>>
Live in California? Thats a natural light shot. Not even using a reflector.
>>
>>3919571
Or Australia
>>
They are shot here in Texas actually
>>
what issues are you currently running into? Could try to get an nd filter for like 20$ if blown out
>>
>>3919570
Probably just a slightly diffused flash, I don't see multiple shadows.
>>
>>3919586
Given you can see the cameraman’s shadow which is the same as the subjects and the face and hand have shadow I doubt it

>>3919583
Looking at the DoF this is shot at like f16 so I doubt that would be necessary
>>
>>3919593
Mhmm thanks
>>
>>3919568
>>3919570
I get that this photog has a style that he’s going for but I just really kinda hate it
>>
>>3919568
Shoot in the sun you fucking knob.
>>
>>3919607
It’s natural, if it wasn’t for the shadow of cameraman clearly holding a big camera I’d assume it’s just a GoPro screen grab
>>
>>3919568
>>3919570
fill flash and/or a bit of post processing tweaking?
>>
File: BigJB21.jpg (3 KB, 102x102)
3 KB
3 KB JPG
>>3919568
God I wish that was me
>>
>>3919568
isn't this overexposed?
>>
>>3919879
Yes, the white are completely fucked.
>>
Expose for the sky. Shoot with the sun behind you - this way the models, facing you, and therefore the sun, will be well exposed too.
>>
>>3919879
>>3919908
Oh noooooo not the whites!
Calibrate your monitors.
>>
>>3919938
fuck the whites amiright?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
>>
>>3919938
>jpg compressed to shit
>implying there's any detail hiding in the highlights that would be visible with a "calibrated monitor"
>>
>>3919568
>>3919570
use super wide angle, shoot with a low hanging sun preferably somewhere on the southern west coast, crank the saturation in post like you're ken rockwell's whore





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.