Since security niggers everywhere fear the Chad DSLR, what is the best compact camera that matches the quality and custom settings of a dslr?
If discretion is key, just use your phone camera.
>>3919265Phone cameras fucking suck.
>>3919266not anymore they don't. If you want a nikon coolpix camera then just buy one. You don't need anons to help you justify your purchase because you are afraid of talking to other humans.
>>3919271That’s not the street edition[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width590Image Height393Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3919273>mirrorlessAs opposed to what?
>>3919274nah, the growing wumao edition is more limited because chinkland. pic related will be next.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3919271that's actually sexy as hell, i like that shade of green.
>>3919263>some Olympus Pen>Zuiko 25mm pancake
>>3919325nevermind forgot that the pancake is actually from the olden four thirds days. sort of just lies around between my mft lenses for some reason
>>3919279>t. didn't read the OP>can't infer from contextthe absolute state of /p/
>>3919271>mfw I just bought the ricoh gr iii regular edition when this shit existed:|
I feel like we have 3 to 5 compact camera recommendation threads active at any given time. Everyone just buy a Ricoh GRIII for fucks sake.
>>3919582This is why I went with the amber brown Nikon Z fc. I knew if I got the black standard one I would regret missing my chance at a rare camera that wasn't solid black or gray. That green Ricoh looks awesome, I didn't know it existed either
>>3919602Whats so special about that camera? Are you all chink shills?
>>3919613everyone wants a truly edc camera that doesn't have shit quality and the gr iii is the only one that actually fits in a pocket, but yeah we have too many compact camera threads
>>3919615Actually I was looking for something that isn't high end, just the best value for a side camera when paranoid faggots dont let me use the professional one. Something within the $300-600 range.
>>3919625Literally your phone
>>3919625Get a used Fuji X-E series cam.
>>3919633Of these draconian places you visit are so anti camera that they have you this paranoid then any camera is going to draw attention except your phone. Embrace reality or KYS faggot
>>3919609The X-E3 is equal or better in ever single regard.
>>3919625xf10, if you know what youre doing, good sensor, silent modegrii, if you know what youre doing, silent mode, screen off. sensor and hardware are getting quite oldrx100 iii onwards, optical zoom, silent mode, evf on/screen off function, v/va have pdafzs100 or other panasonic 1 inchersrx0 i/ii, if you know what your doing, smallest of them all.
>>3919263sony rx100, ricoh GXR, ricoh GRII or III
>>3919691The GR is not quiet silent but the leaf shutter is inaudible in 90% of situations. My a6400 is *actually* silent (but you can't always shoot in silent mode, e.g you'll see artifical light flickering inside if you time the shutter wrong, plus there are issues at high shutter speeds with silent shutter), agree with the rest though
>>3919692>>3919691Wouldnt a HX-80 be a better option?
>>3919684you're allowed to have that opinion. and hey, if you do, save some money and get one, there's nothing making you get the x-e4.
>>3919726>hx80thats probably phone sensor size territory. I'd stick to at least a 1 inch sensor and above. also, its mostly the cameras with largest plus newest sensors that will have better lowlight performance.
>>3919580I'm sorry I can't control the damage that has been done to you brain.
>>3919691>>3919263Just get a ricoh gr i or ii (they're the same minus the wi-fi on the i). To me the sensor and colors are still hard to beat, love mine to death.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelGRCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.3 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:07:20 13:03:11Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.0Brightness9.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormal
>>3919684The fixed screen is the only downside
>>3920173I dont really need a professional compact camera, just a cheap but decent snapshitter. I don't have money to waste $1200 on a camera i'll only use to sneak past guards.
>>3920324have you considered using a smartphone?
>>3920326>have you considered using a smartphone?Smartphone takes garbage pictures, cant zoom either.
>>3920324I would suggest a used Canon G series point and shoot. You could get something like a G10 or G11 for around 100 dollars. Pic related, the small sensor isn't ideal but they take pretty decent photos. Good colors and good meter.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G11Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2020:03:08 17:51:17Exposure Time1/1250 secF-Numberf/5.0ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length30.50 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3920331>Cheap snapshitters takes garbage pictureswell looks like we're gonna go around in circles here
>>3920340i literally just mentioned a 100 dollar camera that takes photos far above the quality of any phone, with a much larger sensor, optical zoom with a sharp lens, and shoots RAW... >>3920340
As we all know, with compact cameras image quality is directly proportional to longness. This longboi is so long that you holkd it sideways...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 WindowsPhotographerDerrick Coetzee (dcoetzee)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern894Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2012:02:22 18:40:51Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.42 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, Compulsory, Return Not DetectedFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3434Image Height2386RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
... whereas this double-longboi is long in two axes, so most be two times better.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution400 dpiVertical Resolution400 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3919263I hate these fucking threads so much. At least once a week we have one of you jokers show up. “Hurr durr I want a camera that takes DSLR quality photos but fits into my pocket!! No i wont use a smart phone!!”. Look dude flagship smartphones take photos 80% as good as a high end point and shoot, and you get to walk around with the best phone available. You are more than welcome to piss away you money on a compact camera. Its your life and your wallet. But everyone here will tell you that its just not worth it. Either you bring your giant brick DSLR/mirrorless with you, or just use your phone. The only niche use for high end point and shoots/compact cameras is if you need waterproof/shatter resistant for outdoor stuff. If you just want to take upskirts of women or whatever it is you do, just use your brand new smart phone
>>3920324Fuji x10s are pretty inexpensive desu and they have good sensors. Build quality isn't great though.
>>3920457>everyone here will tell you that its just not worth it.no they won't. shut up and fuck off phonecuck. go make a phone call or post on tiktok or something. play clash of clans. piece of shit.
>>3920457Absolutely wrong, smartphones lens are smaller than point-and-shoots, and everyone knows that image quality is directly linked to how big your lens is.
>>3919263a nigger once told a chad hey im a chad you nigger and the nigger said back to the chad i am also a nigger you chad and they filmed on film that was expired but the chinks made it good enough to not jew out on them like some wap kike gook injun spic person of color
>>3919271looks like its only available in china. i cant find anywhere to buy it
>>3920481hilarious bro this is why i keep coming back here, this community is so fucking cool and knowledgeable
>>3919691>zs100 or other panasonic 1 inchersThese are really good. *Basically * the same as the Sony RX100, but a fraction of the cost.
>>3920324>a camera i'll only use to sneak past guards.What are you shooting that you have to do this??
>>3919263Get an old enough camers that its age is disarming and heartwarming. TLR is a great example, they look old timey and quirky enough that nobody suspects youre taking anything shady. You literally get people coming to you on the street, wanting you to take their picture.
>>3920548imagine a CIA agent preparing for an important mission and coming to /p/ to get help planning his equipment loadout
>>3919263>Since security niggers everywhere fear the Chad DSLRWhere?
>>3920548I live in the dictatorship shithole of El Salvador. Free press is banned now and journalists harrassed. Anyone owning a DSLR is taken for a journalist.
Now i know why people buy fuji.
>>3920647ugh are you that dude I helped pick a DSLR a couple months ago looking at Salvadorean classifieds?
>>3920559It's fun initially but gets old pretty quick, unless you want to practice portraiture with random people. Then there's the issue of spending over two dollars per shot if you factor in the cost of film and development. Still, you are definitely correct in people feeling more comfortable and less hostile getting their picture taken, but it makes it tricky to get any sort of candid street shots.
>>3920774Yeah. Now i only use it at home. Still love it.
>>3920810Should have just bought a better phone
>>3920774>that dude I helped pick a DSLR a couple months ago This sounds familiar. What did you end up buying?
>>3920880Nikon D3300, cost me $300 and came with a kit zoom.
do grs still have dust problems
>>3920972The III has dust removal via shaking the sensor. It's configured to run on start up and shutdown. I haven't seen any dust in my pics yet but I'm 1 month in so give it time.