Fujifilm x10. Cute. I take it with me everywhere. Fuck DSLR. Does anyone have experience with it? What is your compact camera of choice?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePicasaPhotographerChristian SeitzImage-Specific Properties:
I've been using a Fuji X100V since last June. I like it. Compact and I take it with me daily.
Just got the x100v a couple of days ago. Still learning the ins and outs of that camera (coming from analog), but I really like it so far.
Canon G9 X is my take everywhere camera
I used the X100F on an almost-daily basis for 2 years, but the GR is really the king of taking anywhere with you. I could take it on runs and it felt fine whereas the X100 and even X70 are pretty heavy.
>>3915010I have always considered getting the X20. It is the most modern camera with a great separate zooming viewfinder. Xtrans is crap though, but the X10 w/ bayer sensor has its own problems and it doesn't have the nice info readout in the viewfinder.
>>3915010Really useful with its 28-70 equ. (those numbers are shown on the lens barrel). Compact, discreet. Can still get good pictures today in broad daylight. Fuck the battery, it dies quickly and shut off the camera before any warning.>What is your compact camera of choice?A sony a7r III, plus a 35, 40 or 50mm adapted lens.Damn this new captcha![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)200 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:13 19:13:02Exposure Time1/200 secExposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating160Brightness-0.3 EVExposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
Thoughts on the GR III ?
>>3915070that's the most attractive camera i can think of but it's a bit fragile and expensive.i'm thinking of getting a xf10 for 300€ instead
>>3915070I'm still surprised how this little camera can do such great image quality. Def must-have if you have enough money to buy it.
>>3915086I actually thought of getting that one for c cam as well. I need to check performance of that lens first and how it's buffer performs.
MFT enjoyer here with an Olympus OM-D EM-5 and hipster tier Cmount f.1.4 manual lense. it is easier to carry around than a 7D with a 70-200mm F4 and a battery grip, feels like cheating though.
>>3915087>>3915091Alright I'm getting one. I like my a6400 but I want a second camera that is genuinely always on me without having smartphone tier iq thx
>>3915010looks so fucking ugly, lol
>>3915010I have an XF10, good IQ for the pocketable size
>>3915046same feeling after owning the same cameras>>3915070expensive, but there is nothing else that competes. i use it more than anything i own, by far, because it is so easy to grab on my way out the door.
Olympus XZ-1 is sleek and has a real nice lens.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCASIO COMPUTER CO.,LTD.Camera ModelEX-V8Camera Software1.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:07:11 00:41:37Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/3.4Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width960Image Height1280RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessNormal
>>3915012>>3915022Based. Post photos
>>3915086>>3915091I have it. You can ask questions. I rate it a 6/10. It's good at what it does and I don't see the issue with a soft lens but 28mm for me is completely useless.
>>3915010I really wish I had a coolpix A[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width685Image Height448Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3915312For a while they were very cheap on ebay, I'm still bummed out I didn't get one when they were like €200.The name also makes them overly hard to find.
does a true full frame compact exist?
>>3915070um you realise that is a pentax camerado you really want to be walking around with a pentaxi mean come on
>>3915308kek, why did you buy one knowing it's 28 equiv?
>>3915336Lens on it is very cringe. You need for Zeiss to get something usable out of it, but then it's so large, that you're better of with a Sigma FP and that one small lens that they have.
>>3915336Oh, speaking of sony. Sony has a great budget compact camera that is hugely overlooked - Sony RX100. I bought it for around 150 USD second-hand. Really small and amazing image quality. Sadly no viewfinder in this one.
>>3915306here you go lad. Toronto kinda sucks to shoot as a city desu.
>>3915184Love it so far, need to get a real wrist strap though the one it comes with is flimsy af. It comfortably fits in my pocket and takes a total of 2s to pull out and get a shot so I'm happy
>>3915343I don’t see why we can’t have compact lenses like in film p&s of 30 years ago right?
>>3915580>its the city not me>posts this shit oh man
>>3915589Those lenses cannot resolve modern sensors, unless you want a return to 12mp which isn't a bad idea anyways.
>>3915594Honestly I’d be happy with a 6–12 mp full frame super compact fixed but sharp lens, that way it doesn’t eat into the dslr/mirrorless market, would probably kill Fuji though kekFuxkit I miss that start a kisckstarter to get this underway
>>3915580Noice. Do you use film simulation?
>>3915618No I'm not a faggot
>>3915010I wanted to get one, but the 'dumb' viewfinder kills it for me. No focus confirmation or anything of the sort reduces the usefulness to near zero.
Anyone has experience with the m200? It has a 22mm len that seems small enough to have the whole thing in pant pocket. Wonder if they have gimped the manual settings, especially in video. Also if it's nice or a pain to use.
>>3915010I have an x10 but desu i mainly use it to meter for slide film
>>3915772Post more pics
>>3915010The pen f still hasn't been beaten in aesthetics even years later.
>>3915824>bokeh on a product shitfucking disgraceful
>>3915010>What is your compact camera of choice?Olympus XA
>>3915824It's a shame that the dial on the front is used to change the filter on JPEGs. Also it feels kinda plasticky in the hand.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelPEN-FCamera SoftwareVersion 3.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2019:04:23 06:18:28Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length20.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width724Image Height1086RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3915010Honestly, my X-T2 with the 27mm is plenty small enough. Basically, if a camera is bigger than a GR, it's not pocketable so you may as well have a decent camera.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1324Image Height593
>>3915756I have the original M with the 22mm and I love it
>>3915182>MFT enjoyer here >can't spell "lens"yep, checks out.
>>3915801Just to clarify, >>3915772 is a crop from a Velvia 100 slide. Here's an actual picture from the X10 if that's what you wanted
>>3915342Because the widest lens I own is 41mm (ff equivalent) so I figured I would love to have a 28mm but as it turns out you shouldn't go below 35mm unless you specifically want a certain look
>>3915312I got one refurbished. It’s very comfy. It’s a shame there’s no focus peaking, but at 28mm, most stuff is in focus anyway.
>>3915871 Post more pics from X10. You shoot raw?
is having a good camera a meme
I just bought a Sony Rx100 mk1. Excited to see what it's capable of.Another compact I never see mentioned in these threads are the Sigma DP1 and DP2 with their Foveon sensors. They can take beautiful pictures but you have to keep the ISO low.
>>3915343It uses the same sensor as the A7 so it is a real full frame compact. >>3915343I feel the lens was better suited for the original RX1 but the ii-r need something "upgraded" to fool people into spending 2000$ more for a slightly better camera.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX1Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 4.3 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:07:12 13:41:05Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating500Lens Aperturef/16.0Brightness4.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceCloudy WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3915876Do you find it to be easily pocketable? I thought about getting one recently, but couldn't justify it when I already have the Canon EOS M with the 22mm lens, but the 22mm still makes it too big to pocket.
>>3915910Mostly jpeg desu, the x10 raws don't have a huge amount of extra information and the jpeg processing is quite good, especially if you leave the file quality at M so it can do the EXR dynamic range thing
>>3915936>I already have the Canon EOS M with the 22mm lens, but the 22mm still makes it too big to pocketIs it really? I've only seen pictures but the whole package seems pretty small. Are you a girl or just wear really tight pants?
I wish Pentax would make another Q for shits and giggles.
>>3915939It's not ideal, but I can get it in all my pockets. Getting it out of my pockets quickly and safely is an issue though, especially with jeans. I have the Canon G9 X which is the perfect size for any pocket, so it'd be nice to have something with a larger sensor with comparable thickness.
>>3915947Pentax always had an eye for great lens design, these look nice
>>3915947Quick, someone, find samples from toy lenses!
>>3915952is that a Canon EOS M with a 22mm lens in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?
>>3915220>pocketable>>3915581>pocket>>3915756>pocket>>3915842>pocketable>>3915936>pocketable>>3915939>pocket>>3915952>pockets>pockets>pocket>>3916005>pocketno wonder /p/ is fully nophotos
>>3916037how do you take photos if it's always in your pocket?
>>3916041nobody said it's always in the pocket. you misunderstood, either wilfully or out of genuine lack of comprehension. I suspect the former.
x10 brings me back some good memories. My first Fujifilm camera. Used to enjoy it a lot, sold it and bought a X100t some years ago, and it's still going strong pic related, from my x10[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX10Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2017:03:04 19:46:17Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Brightness7.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3916041autistic people be like
>>3915580fellow Torontanon here there's alot of cool stuff here, but the city is big so you gotta hoof around alotbeen catching these free concerts at a park now that everything is opening up - shaking off the rust before indoor concerts happen :3[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D780Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern792Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:07:12 23:43:16Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1400Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length85.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
How is the Olly power zoom? I have an E-M5 iii already, but like the idea of getting the E-M10 iv kit as a backup cam with a pancake zoom I can leave in my glove box or put in a hoodie pocket.
I really want a lumix lx100 ii but they are stupid expensive.
>>3916196>lumix lx100 iiWhat's special about this camera?
>>3915010really wish they didn't kill the x10 line with the x30, and also kept the ovf. such a comfy form factor, I take my x100s most places but I'd literally never put down an x40 if it existed
>>3915580>toronto kinda sucks to shoot as a city>posts the cn toweryou have got to be fucking kidding me. maybe walk outside of fort york condo land?
>>3916092Very rich and saturated colours, soft everywhere, but somewhat acceptable iq from 16mm to 30mm, fi you can live with f4.6 already at 25mm. Great for closeup and near macro where sharpness isn't major factor. Powerzoom is annoying, but focus ring is decent.
>requires a separate attachment for the single most important and versatile focal length>no actual rangefinder mechanism>attachment occludes the image on the already hamstrung OVF>EVF is literal eye cancerThe X100 series could have been so much more than the poor man's Leica. It's a pale imitation.
should I buy a beat-up but fully functional X100s for 200 dollars? have the opportunity today.
>>3916201Really nice lens. No wonder since it's dlux7 in different package.
>>3916223By a poor man's Leica do you refer to Leica's range of digital cameras?Or are you comparing a digital camera to some old film camera?
>>3916236The digital leicas. They have enough wrong with them that it shouldn't be hard to come out with a better camera but somehow fuji manages to miss the mark.
>>3916201I really want a micro four thirds camera for the size but if it is interchangeable lens I will succumb to gear faggetry since there are so many nice lenses available for m43. The lx100 has a 24-75mm equivalent lens which is perfect for photo/video and it can record 4k. It is also small, lightweight, and beautiful looking. Plenty of physical controls, manual aperture ring, leica optics, high quality evf. It is a nice camera.
>>3916196>>3916201>>3916326Good luck keeping the sensor clean and cleaning it once it’s dirty, these cameras are horrible for this
>>3915580just go shoot photos of hipster girls in Kensington outside Ronnie's. Moving up here was a great decision.
>>3916306thanks I did it. Not actually in as bad condition as I thought. Just dirt/fingerprints. Feel like I got a really good deal as Fuji stuff near me is always priced really highly secondhand
>>3916414Fujis seem to hold their value pretty well, if you buy them used and sell them it’s basically like a long-term rental.
>>3916449PENF actually appreciated in value.
>>3916463i got this
>>3916463Love the pen-f. Wish they were not so expensive.
>>3916483would be better if it was full frame though, as it is its useless and a waste of time, may as well just stick to your phone.
>>3915756Had an m with 22mm and I'm sorry to tell you it won't fit into jeans, carpenter pants, or khakis. It only fits into cargo pants while using a belt. It looks ridiculous as if carrying a small brick.
>>3916521You are small, grow a foot or two
>>3916521I long wanted to have a m + the 22mm but eventually decided I want portability over image quality. If want to pixel peep I can bring my dslr. So I got one of the more portable P&S 2nd hand.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G9 X Mark IICamera SoftwareDigital Photo ProfessionalLens Size10.20 - 30.60 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 00.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:07:14 17:36:17Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/8.0ISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias-1/3 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length10.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeUnknownFocus ModeUnknownDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance2.860 mWhite BalanceDaylightExposure Compensation2Sensor ISO Speed170Image Number125-0984Color Matrix133
>>3916235Why on earth would they put a hardware switch for aspect ratio?
>>3917034The G9 X is some good shit. I recently went on a trip and made the decision to leave the EOS M behind, and I don't regret it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G9 X Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:07:15 09:24:44Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length10.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3916077I am really excited about things opening back up again. Cool shot!
>>3917053>missing the perfect aspect ratio shot scrambling around in the menusNgmi
>>3917360>cropping gives you cooties
>>3917184artists pallete? You'll need to hike closer and crank up ur saturation. All the photos you see online are touched up to fucking hell
>>3918305Boom-shakalaka[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G9 X Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:07:18 15:02:26Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length10.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3916356this is extremely true. One of the downsides of all non-removable lens cameras .. Are there any that are sealed well enough that never allow dust in?
>>3916203I think it's because Huawei bought up and hoarded all the 1/1.7" sensors for their P-series phones. If they didn't, we could have had an X40 with 40 megapixels
I vouch for the X100V as well love it, have a Black promist 1/4 on it for a recent NYC trip earlier this year[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100VCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 4.2 (Windows)PhotographerPhenry_photographyMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:05:04 21:29:41Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness5.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
rx100 m3, I love this camera. I bought a "real" camera the a6400 and I keep going back to my rx100. It fits in my pocket, jacket, back pack, everywhere. I would like an ILC camera but even the small ones are a hassle. Rx100 fits all my needs, I just wish sometimes the sensor was bigger
>>3918867I just accidently an RX100 IV (lowballed an ebay seller, and they actually bit) so lets see how it holds up to the Nex 7.
>>3918867I have an RX100 M3 as well, unfortunately it's kinda dying - viewfinder/LCD switching doesn't work right and I sometimes have to eject and insert the SD card multiple times before it'll recognize it - and I can't warranty it or anything because it's a Japanese model and I'm in the US. It's a shame because I really like the thing otherwise and when it worked reliably it was great, really impressive performance for something that's truly pocketable, especially by the standards of 2017 when I bought it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX100M3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)55 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2017:09:09 21:34:09Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-0.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length20.05 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3915936>Do you find it to be easily pocketable?A jacket or hoodie pocket, yes. Pants? It might fit, depending on how you dress, but I’m not comfortable doing it.
>>3915010small sensor = boring shotsthe handling is pretty nice though
>>3915010I had that and the X20. They were meh gimmicks. I'll take a powershot any day.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX20Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2014:11:09 22:26:49Exposure Time1/1200 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness4.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length8.90 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3918858this is a great photo wow
>>3918858>So much DoF at f/2Lucky bastards
>>3920812>Thinking you'll get bokeh at infinity focus with any camera everBAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>3920746>small sensor = boring shotslmao never change /p/
>>3920859>thinks large format is a myth
>>3916054Wonderful photo Anon, pls tell me more about it.
>>3920862you mean never stop telling it like it is? one major thing that sets photography apart from other 2d mediums is the ability to portray 3d through shallow depth of field. using a small sensor, you are crippling yourself
>>3920859>thinking infinity is from 1m awayKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEK
>>3920803lol, are you fucking serious?
>>3915010I have an rx100m3 and an x-t2. Though I prefer the x-t2 + 35mmF1.4 the rx100m3 still gets plenty of use as an edc and travel camera. I've taken some of my favorite pictures with the rx100m3 just because it was there when I needed it. Good for creepin too
>>3915010I bought this one for 15€ on a second hand store to have it in my car.For the price, is this a decent purchase?
>>3915010So I had an a6000 + 7artisans 35mm f1.2 setup and I loved it to deaththe only thing that was annoying me was the focus shift in the edges because of the rangefinder design.I sold the setup and settled with an A7ii + Minolta 50mm because muh FF! and man... I shoot less now.I miss the small lightweight cam, and because of the viewfinder, it was comfy to compose portrait shots on those. I also miss the close range focus compared to the 0.5m focus on my MinoltaI admit it's not small or anything, but it definitely felt like it
>>3922721so you gonna go back?
>>3922733I... don't know reallyI might just try to find a small enough lens for my A7ii but eh...I can also just cope and use APSC mode on it lol[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1280Image Height853
>>3922721thats why even though sometimes I think of an a6400 or even a a7c upgrade, at the end of the day, I realize the a6k with small lens will still weigh less and be of more use
>>3915010Looking for some help, I'm looking to get a compact full frame camera. I like to use small primes, I don't really care about manual or auto focus. And I'm not interested in Fuje and their xtranny files that don't fit into my work flow. Any suggestions? price is somewhat of a factor.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D500Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.0 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)87 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:08:01 19:45:24Exposure Time55922/44737601 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating125Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length58.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3712Image Height5568Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3922736Is this your pic? Because this isn't the markII. You can try a m42 adapter + a Pentacon Auto 50 1.8 (focus down to 0.33), pic related.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)PhotographerDavid MornetMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:07:15 19:49:23Exposure Time5 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating80Brightness-11.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDay White FluorescentFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3922790i'd say any a7/r/s, though they keep getting thicker every iteration. a7c is the same as the mark III's but without the SLR-like hump. canon rp is in between in height but wider/deeper grip
>>3922790sigma fp>>3922807he said compact[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0ISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length70.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAuto
>>3922805Nah just saved the pic because that Minolta stickers looks coolI'm actually thinking of picking up a /digishit/ again because I enjoyed shooting with my Minolta Dimage F100 (I mistakingly left mine back home). That XT10/20 on OP interested me and even a Canon Powershot G would doI'd recommend you bros doing the /digishit/ too because it's fun and cheap lol
>>3922845those are the smallest FF i know. i always forget about sigma cameras
Im pretty new at photography, i go out a lot, is there any point and shoot (like fixed lens) camera that can achieve some degree of bokeh for portraits?I often meet people in the street and i would love to have something pocketable to do a portrait in the moment[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T1Camera SoftwareCapture One 21 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)32 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating500Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness-0.5 EVExposure Bias1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length21.00 mmImage Width3264Image Height4896RenderingNormalExposure ModeAuto BracketWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3922960i currently have a fuji x70 that i love (But the 18.5mm lens its a pain in the ass) and a canon sx720hs (i used to do a lot of superzoom photography) and its hard to decide which one i take with me
>>3922721>>3922736the simple answer is the sony 50mm f/2.5 g. it's pretty compact and it gets you a 50, plus AF.>>3922790that lens has really nice bokeh.>>3922960you didn't mention a budget so a sony rx1r ii would be great. if you want something a bit less pocketable, you could get a fuji x-e series camera, like an x-e3 or the newer x-e4, and put on the fuji 35mm f/2, which would get you a 50mm equivalent with plenty of bokeh.
>>3923103i know of the Rx1r ii, its a dream for me, but obviously way out of my leagueMoving from a x70 to a canon g5x or g1x or g9x im gonna suffer a lot because of the smaller sensor size,right?
>>3922790>>3923103The lens is a Voigtlander 58mm f/1.4, its an 85mm on the crop.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D500Camera SoftwareNX Studio 1.0 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern994Focal Length (35mm Equiv)87 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:08:02 23:27:42Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/1.4Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length58.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3712Image Height5568RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3923113oh interesting, I figured it was the Nikkor 58 f/1.4. either way, it's absolutely lovely, in both shots.
>>3923112going down to a 1 inch sensor is definitely going to decrease your bokeh potential significantly. the g1x, it depends on which generation; if you're looking at the original, it's 1.5", so it's still smaller but not as small as the 1" sensors. looking at the mark iii, it has an aps-c sensor, so you wouldn't actually be downgrading your sensor size significantly in that case (canon aps-c is smaller than everyone elses's, so it is a downgrade in size still). but the built in lenses on the g series cameras don't seem particularly fast to me. you'd have to check out photos taken on the long end and see if they have sufficient bokeh for you.
>>3915010>>3915012Would one of these be good for a first camera?
>>3926071>first camerathe best first camera is your phone, or if you really urgently want to spend money, upgrading your phone to a sammysung or iphone with manual camera softwaregear isn't photography and no amount of gear will help you with framing and composition, moment and time, etc.
>>3926072I've taken pics with my phone, don't be a fag
>>3922867Consider the Nikon P7800
>>3926071If you like fujis, get an xt2. Full manual controls and ability to change lenses (unlike the x100v or x10) is important since you don't know your preferences yet. Also they're extremely well priced atm and will take you as far as you'd like to go. Feel free to ask any more questions here: >>3916604
>>3926073If you feel your phone does not do it, for a first camera I'd recommend a dslr/mirrorless kit from last 10 years. Whatever brand you fancy.Myself have a G9X II. It's not as good in ergonomics and for pixel peeping as my dslr from 2013 but a very portable compromise.
>>3926071Don't listen to >>3927779, interchangeable lens cameras are overrated. You'll spend quite a bit of money on a nice body, and then get saddled with a pretty crappy kit lens. Meanwhile, a nice fixed lens camera has a sensor and lens that are designed to suit one another and produce the best overall quality, while being yet more compact than even the smallest ILC. Your chosen examples are particularly unique for being cameras with optical viewfinders which I personally think are the most fun camera type to use. The only ILC with a similar viewfinder are Fuji's X-Pro series which are either too old or too expensive. As a first camera, get an X20, X100, Ricoh GR or maybe a Sony RX100 III. Well, really you should get a film camera, and not just pretend with a Fuji, but whatevs.
Wanna get my first camera soon and it seems like the canon eos m is matching my needs and I can get it for 200€. Should I purchase? Are there any hidden cons I should be aware of? And what are the alternatives at this budget price range (400--500€ max.]?
>>3929678As a first camera someone should get the biggest focal zoom you can get, that's how you will get familiar with all kinds of compositions as long as the shooter is not lazy zooming all the time.Someone learning with a fixed lens will certainly become proficient in a specific focal length but become confused and uncomfortable with other lengths like 20mm or 200mm.
Worth it to get a Snoy RX1005A, $600 open box?
>>3923103I just got a Sigma 45mm f2.8 for my A7C and its working out nice.its not as fast and softer at minimum focus distance, but I got it about $300 cheaper than the Sony 40mm
>>3922736get a Samyang 35mm f2.8its really super small and a AF is super slick. it's quite honestly the best small form factor lens for Sony FF out there right now imo
>>3917053>Why on earth would they put a hardware switch for aspect ratio?how about you go to the product page and see why you fucking lazy idiot?
I use an RX100 VII as a newfag to photography. I like it a lot, although it seems to suffer with low light a bit.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX100M7Camera Softwarepaint.net 4.1.6Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:02:23 18:30:16Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Brightness-0.9 EVExposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length9.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4864Image Height3648RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3918858Are americans really bombarded with this much advertising constantly? Surely that must fuck their psyche
>>3929950You haven't the slightest idea. In our daily routines we will see thousands of ads per day, if the technology was there we would have advertising in our dreams when we sleep. Once beautiful landscapes have been ruined with billboards.
Thoughts on the G1X 3?
>>3931351I want one but the lack of a mic jack makes the price not worth it
Are the GRs a meme?
>>3929950Yes only America has big cities with signs
>>3931628No, they’re genuinely great, and one of the few small cameras that feel like they’re designed using feedback from serious users
>>3915086the griii is durable as fuck
>>3915842>if a camera is bigger than a GR, it's not pocketable so you may as well have a decent camerai generally agree with this although i like to walk around with the thing in my hand so a small difference in size is quite noticeable to me
>>3915952imagine walking around like this. i don't fucking understand people when they say "pocketable". like is this what they mean? what the hell man
>>3922721if those cheap chinese lenses had proper click-stopped aperture rings I'd probably own six of them
Anyone own or handled the Panasonic GX80/85? Thinking of picking this up, can get it for 402$ (new is 620$)I want to go full autistic mode and play around with the Oly 60mm macro
>>3931723some do, and also you can mod some to have ithttps://yukosteel.wordpress.com/2018/05/22/click-stop-aperture-for-7artisans-35mm-f1-2-lens/
Can you get good astro shots with a 1" sensor?
>>3915010Newfag here. What's the most affordable/shilled/memed Camera I can trust is a good buy? Like the Lenovo Thinkpad of /g/
>>3916472Wait, this thing isn't a GoPro-type camera? That's super cool
>>3932153>ThinkpadPentax DSLR. Heavy, ugly, outdated and will still be around to take pictures of the aftermath of a nuclear holocaust.
>>3932074Yes, excellent ones. Technique becomes more important the longer duration you have.
What tripod do you use compactbros?
These either have horrible sensors compared to new budget phones, or they cost a lot moreI'm happy with my old DSLR and especially with its very long battery life
>>3932387Phones will never compete with larger sensors at high ISOs in terms of raw sensor performance, and phones will always be limited to deep DOF, even if they use software fakery to try to get around these things
I bought a GR3 just to have an excuse to always have a camera on me when I cbf taking my main camera out. The thing that shits me off, even though it haan’t been a huge problem yet, is that it isn’t dust/weather sealed.If you’re going to have a camera designed to go into your pocket or a corner of your bag, it would be better that it didn’t get fucking lint and shit inside it.I’m probably going to get rid of it eventually and get an RX100 or just get a better phone for lazy days.
>>3932367Whatever flat ledge is around
>>3933548The dust thing isn't a big issue with the gr iii, just keep your pockets clean. You can always clean the sensor later. You're right about the weatherproofing though. Dumb decision not to make it weatherproof
>>3933554Is the griii an ILC?
>>3933556gr's are fixed lens
>>3932367I just use a cheap chink smol gorillapod knockoff but only on surfaces>>3932387GR3, XF10 have 'newish' 1.5x apsc sensors and are both true compacts.I have an 2008 dslr but I rarely use it, only when I feel nostalgic. I prefer using my compact or mirrorless.>>3933548sandwich bag? I agree, for the GR3 price and as a high end compact, at least it should be weather sealed like pentax.
>>3915937This is really nice
>>3915010i very much like the idea of this camera, and i totally want one, except for the fact that its got a fucking wide angle lens on it. i don't ever shoot wide angle. id be all over this if it had a 35mm (50mm equivalent) lens on it. i guess people prefer the wide angle because it lets them take pics of their friends across the table at restaurants, or because they can zone focus better, or because its physically smaller, but you're a fat idiot and if im spending $1054023 on a camera i want the pics to be a standard focal length that doens't distrot faces and people look like shit[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelGFX 50RCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2020:02:28 17:11:29Exposure Time1/55 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness-0.4 EVExposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length63.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>393362250mm is the morning shit of focal lengths. Sure they're normal nut they're also disgusting and no-one wants to look at them. Go wide or go long.>t. x100v owning chad
>>3933623Pretty much this, but 35mm is just as bad as 50mm. You need to go even wider and longer. 28mm or 24mm and 85mm is the sweet spot really.
>>3929883I did. It doesn't say. Dumb fucking switch even though I like the camera. This is worse than the PEN Fs colour dial.
>>3933623>they're normal nut they're also disgusting and no-one wants to look at them. Go wide or go longwhat? the fuck
>>3933625There you have it, folks. Anything between 28 and 85mm is disgusting and nobody wants to look at them.
>tfw stupidest person alive>had camera since december last year>always disappointed with how weird low light looks>only just today realised that "weirdness" is the clouds
>>3933623>I rely on gimmicks to take photos I don't think look shitImagine not being able to compose a good shot on a 35mm, you must be bad at photography
Just ordered a GR3. How worried should I be about dust? I plan to keep it in my front trouser pocket which can get full of dust and lint. Should I get a case/pouch for it?
>>3933671Dust is a really blown up issue with the GR line. Especially with the GR3 you'll be fine because it has IBIS, which also enables a sensore cleaning function.I've had my GR II almost since release and I don't baby my cameras. Front pocket always worked out fine for me, and at home I put it in a tupperware box, but I do that with most of my electronics.
>>3933689I hope so. I might just rock a fanny pack anyway for my 90s aesthetic.
>>3933714>mfw I regularly used fanny packs in the 80s
>>3933724>the 80show old are you nigga
>>3933724I had one in 1990 when I was 4. Used to keep my pocket fan, camdy and asthma inhaler in there. Shit was so cash.
>>3933727I recently bought one, but I wear it across my shoulder. Very comfy, and if you know how to dress properly it's perfectly onobtrusive in public.
>>3933671get one of these to clean the lens assembly after a day of shooting. dust is going to sit inside of the protruding lens first before being sucked in by frequently switching the camera on and off. if you're actually out shooting, once a day should do the trick
>>3932387>doesn't know the GR and XF10 and X100 and X70 have sensors that are probably just as large and technically superior to his old DSLRkek
>>3915947I'd really like to see what the Q lenses could accomplish with a more modern sensor. They almost feel wasted.
>>3934079thisthe pentax q was an incredibly comfy camera but buying one today for the price they cost is stupid. I'd take one if I could get it for $50 though. More than that I'd like to see a new one. The lenses are already out there and I'm 99% sure a modern Q would sell
>>3934086My phone has a bigger sensor.
>>3933901>X100>Superior to a full-frame in any way not portability lel
>>3934114I like large depth of field and low light works fine for me at 3200 on the X100.
>>3934114>doesn't know that a new APS-C sensor is going to cuck 5 year old fool frame cameras
Just found an old canon ixus 750 without battery. Can those batteries charge with the av usb cable?
>>3915010>cutewhat the hell happened to masculinity? you'll always be stuck in your basement if you don't grow some balls.
I have an RX100 ii that I really liked, unfortunately it was kill after a quick dip in saltwater. It worked for a couple days, but I guess corrosion took hold after that. Think it's worth opening it up to have a look around?In the meantime does anyone have experience with the Olympus tough cameras? It's somewhat likely that I would kill another non waterproof camera[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX100M2Camera Softwaredarktable 3.4.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:09:01 10:41:21Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Brightness3.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length10.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Got it! Taking it downtown later to test it. I'm pretty surprised how extreme the contrast is on the "high contrast B&W" preset.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-F711BCamera SoftwareF711BXXU1AUG7Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height3000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:09:01 15:44:30Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length4.25 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height3000Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio2.2Scene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDJ12QSNL01SM
>>3934194I think I hate it. This camera will almost definitely be back on eBay within a couple of weeks.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelRICOH GR IIICamera SoftwareRICOH GR III Ver. 1.41Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:09:01 18:02:06Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1086Image Height724RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>3934339Composing with just the rear screen takes some getting used to. A lot of my shots were wonky.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelRICOH GR IIICamera SoftwareRICOH GR III Ver. 1.41Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:09:01 18:20:17Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.30 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1086Image Height724RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>3934339so shit ton of dust at small apertures and you're offloading it to some sucker?
>>3934342I love the results but the process was lacking. Back to the X-T2 for me.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelRICOH GR IIICamera SoftwareRICOH GR III Ver. 1.41Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:09:01 18:36:40Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4800Image Height3200RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>3934344There's no dust. What are you talking about?
>>3915010>Canon M100I got it cause the body was cheap, but I hope to replace it with something with more durable with more physical buttons and dials, and maybe 4k video.I usually keep the 22mm f/2 lens on it since it's the most compact. I occasionally bring th 15-45mm and the 32mm f/1.4 as well.
>>3934192>saltwater>a couple daysIt's dead. Saltwater corrosion = strip & clean in a few hours at most (and keep it immersed in regularly changed DI water until then if possible, do NOT let it dry unwashed) if you want to avoid permanent damage. As saltwater dries the salts concentrate, and that's when they start chewing through all that nice copper and nickel tying all the components together.
>>3934194>>3934339>>3934342 - especially this oneI dunno, I think it looks good
>>3933671is there an available ttl flash for the gr3, as small as the built in flash like in the gr2 but can be attached on the hot shoe? it doesnt need to tilt, just direct ttl flash
>>3934355If you wouldn't mind a somewhat bigger camera I can wholeheartedly recommend the M6 mark II - ticks all your boxes and you can use your EF-M lenses with it.Be aware that it is also not weather sealed and the 4k video is supposedly softer than other cameras in this price range (I never tried it so I'm unable to confirm).
Are there any modern compact cameras without a back screen? I'm only looking for a cheap Fujifilm-like camera (with dials) but I don't really need a back screen.
Fujifilm x10 or gr3???
>>3936548literally every camera I can think of made after 2010 or earlier has a back screen
>>3936548No. Xpro3 or if you're fancy a Leica M10R or whatever it's called are the only ones and they niche.
>>3936548Literally every film p&s doesn’t have a back screen
Any recommendations for a cheap used small camera? Looking at Sony a6000 on eBay, any other recs
>>3937469oops, didn't realize i was on this thread and not /gear/
>>3937466Most importantly, what do you want to do with the camera? a6000 can take good images but is very frustrating to use
>>3936548Nope. There is really nothing that fits your description. You could get something with a rotating screen, just flip it around and leave it closed all the time. Like some PowerShot G series or whatever they're called.
>>3937332>>3937432>>3937547Thanks, the recommended cameras are too expensive though.I already have an a6000 but I'd love to get a light weight Fujifilm like camera, any recommendations?>>3937534I have one, why do you feel it's frustrating? Maybe I just got used to it.
>>3937677>why do you feel it's frustrating?A lot of small things>no silent mode>annoyingly sharp shutter sound>sooc jpegs have boring/unpleasant colors, and the engine does not handle high iso well>convoluted, unintuitive menu with hard-to-understand abbreviations (maybe that's only the case in german) >viewfinder is not that good>to enable focus magnification you need to press the button multiple times (I shoot a lot with manual lenses)The worst thing for me is actually the shutter sound, no idea why, I just hate it. I guess the menu issue would go away if I sat down and memorized the manual but other camera manufacturers definitely have better structured menus.I mean it's definitely a usable camera if you are okay with shooting RAW only and can tolerate the shutter sound, but to me it feels like riding a bicycle with not enough air in its tires.
>>3937892Forgot one thing>no auto iso minimum shutter speed optionInstead it just defaults to 1/60
>>3937677You should get a PEN F and just fold the screen away. Great camera.
>>3937938fuuuuuuuuck I wish they'd do a proper successor. as far as I'm concerned they could just put the E-M5 MKIII tech in a PEN F body and call it a day. as long as they put the viewfinder in. current gen PENs omit this crucial part.the PEN F is fantastic, but it's not worth the meme tax to me
>>3915010>What is your compact camera of choice?Original EOS M + 22mm f/2.
>>3937677>I have one, why do you feel it's frustrating? Maybe I just got used to it.FUCK TWENTY SECOND BOOTUPS SOMETIMES
>>3937941I always found it kind of a bummer that it doesn't have a viewfinder. No, the accessory for the hot shoe doesn't count.I know compacts don't always have this, but imho, if it's got interchangeable lenses it should also have an EVF. On compacts with a fixed lens that defitinely fit in a jeans pocket that's no real concern to me.
>>3937947I'd prefer a flip out screen over a viewfinder.
>>3937958I'm conflicted on this one.Definitely Flip out screen > articulating screen for small cameras. But with something as big as the EOS M I think there's no reason not to have both. I mean, it's not really a pocket camera anyways, is it? At least not like the Ricoh GR or whatever. On the GR I wouldn't want a viewfinder.
>>3937938Isn't that a 1000$ camera?
>>3937942What do you expect when you buy a camera made my a computer company?
>>3937892What camera would you suggest instead of an a6000?
thinking about getting the x10 for streetphotos, it will be my first dedicated camera. suggestions on better suggestions on its 250 USD price range?
>>3938805I still dont know what you want to do with itbut a gx880 is smaller and like 350 new, or 450 with the small tele zoombut it has no evf (you can do well without it if you rarely use manual focus)
>>3938805literally anything else but if you're the type that needs to make your own mistakes, go for it bud
New to /p/ thinking about buying a camera since my smartphone camera cracked and i need it for field documentation. I found 2 cameras that seem fit for my purpose:Sony Nex-6 with a 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Olympus Pen E-PL5 with 14-42mm 3.5-5.5They are both 150€ each and they seem to have really similar specs overall. Only thing i like more about the sony is the integrated viewfinder. Just trying to get some more recommendations i guess since the olympus seems to have more freedom on the overall settings. All input appreciated
Thoughts on Nikon A900? Want a small pocket camera for birds when I go on long walks.
>>3922790Nikon z6/5 with the new 40mm f2
>>3915923i have the RX100m7, its a great camera
>>3939669Should do the job on a bright day but you will need to learn how to be rock steady with a small camera, that one only goes to usable 1600 ISO.Also no bokeh.
>>3915923>Another compact I never see mentioned in these threads are the Sigma DP1 and DP2 with their Foveon sensorsLurk moar then
i still use a 2007 g9. not really pocketable but i love the gritty look of older digital cameras[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
Just got an iPhone 12 Pro and loving having a nifty fifty in my pocket. T H E O N E Y O U H A V E W I T H Y O U[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 12 ProCamera Software14.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:09:17 14:10:11Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness2.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
Thoughts on Casio's high-end compacts? (EX10, EX100, ZR5000) they have fuckhuge screens and the ZR5000 has a 19mm equivalent ultrawide in its zoom range
>>3934112And? Glass is half the equation and phones generally have terrible lenses because of the size limitations. A decade old Q still beats most smartphones with everything but low-light performance.
>>3940534can you get real DOF on these lens? not that AI gimmick.f2.0 looks pretty sharp throughout here.
>>3922706It's a film camera so keeping it in your (possibly hot) car all day may negatively impact the quality of the film in the camera. Other than that it's a nice camera to have on you at all times. My main camera is an oly pen epl8 with adapted manual focus lenses and I had a great time using it. My biggest problems with it are the 2x crop (which sometimes comes in handy too) and the quality falloff on higher ISOs.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelE-PL8Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.4.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:02:17 21:06:42Exposure Time1/160 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash
>>3918248lol underrated. Miss selling my PenFT. Had it early on in photography and didn’t realize what a cool camera I was sitting on.
>>3941717f/2 will get you a shallower depth of field on a larger sensor than on a smaller one, it's why pretty much everything is sharp when taken with a tiny smartphone camera
What settings should I use for nightime with the RX100?