boomers are cancer to photography, they all take the same pretentious, ultra processed, old people or misery. Bland and mediocre. They praise each other.
>>3899620>seething nophoto Every.Single.Time.
>>3899620Most of the poverty porn being made nowadays isn't by boomers. Millennial and gen Z hipsters are the real threat.
>>3899621hopefully they are dying or will die soon, they are lost, they don't understand shit
>>3899620Show us some of your work so that we may learn from one of the modern greats.
Just had a heartbreaking experience where a guy I was buying a pile of cameras from wound up being a masked sanpaku-eyed boomer with a Flickr full of gravestones and sunsets who was still teeling from the fact that he and Joyce couldn't make it to Ireland this year for their customary six weeks in the cottage.
>>3899679What is it with the Overprocessed HDR and full saturation that boomers love?Does it remind them of the cheap Kodak film of their youth?
this thread is sad. you guys should be ashamed.
>>3899689Why do all millennials and zoomers think all boomers are the same[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width512Image Height640Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:11 19:00:05Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width570Image Height607
>>3899702Apparently anyone born in the 80s is a boomer to them, even if you're born in 1989.Couldn't it be said that zoomers are cancer to photography when they consider a portrait to only be a picture of an attractive female, or how they praise every film photo as it's the best thing ever only because it's shot on film.Or how they add 2 inch white borders to their snapshits to appear more artsy and pretend to add depth and thought to their average images?
At least boomers still print big and present their shit in dusty rooms unlike pierced ultra-tattooed hipsters who make 10 minute videos to present 3 snapshits in 1080p.
>>3899714> Make sure dangly crucifix earring is visible with knit cap before pressing record> makes "Wapoosh" noise> What's up guys welcome back to my channel> In todays video we're going to discuss why you need a pentax spotmatic II in 2021> I recently picked this up for $10 at a thrift store> But first let's watch this 10 minutes of me meeting up with a friend for a coffee and watch him act surprised that I got the camera for $10 from a thrift store> Ok now here's a few photos from my first roll, you can see how every shot is a winner and superior to digital, because I'm a zoom zoom who used film and paid way too much to develop 24 rolls of shitty pics> That wraps up today's video, make sure your next website is with squarespace> click the subscribe button and bell icon, leave a like as that helps me out so much> until next time thanks for watching guys
>>3899620>boomers are cancer to photography, they all take the same pretentious, ultra processed, old people or misery. Bland and mediocre. They praise each other.sounds like you're describing fuji users
>>3899704Isi isn’t a zoomer, she’s an older millennial
>>3899818Don't even know who that is
>>3899620You're not wrong, but this thread doesn't contribute anything either.
>>3899821/p/'s resident tranner
>>3899620Your photos are so much better, thank you for posting them.
It's all so tiresome
>>3899689I like saturation though, and I was born in 1995.I remember the "tail end" of mainstream colour negative film and I always enjoyed the fact that the colours were so vivid.I still enjoy the fact that the colours are very vivid, it's probably my favourite thing about colour negative film apart from the joys of film itself...I don't try to emulate film with digital - I think that's a pointless exercise when you can just obtain and shoot actual film.But I don't understand why the desaturated look is so popular right now. It just seems so... edgy for the sake of being edgy. Either that, or too many people noticed that their Sonys had shit colour science, so desaturate to hide that flaw in their gear.
>>3899900isi may be many things but a tranny she's not. >>3899821Alabama woman who dumps snapshits with no culling and huge white borders. Has a bunch of simps who defend her pictures of nothing.
>>3899623they seem nice
>>3899620Is it just me or does the lady in the left picture look hyper photoshopped into that scene
>>3899620They are the worst gear fags and nophotos out there, you can always count on a circle jerk involving boomers trying to alleivate the cognitive dissonance from their most recent purchases, that's all everything really is online and now that I think of it we are all dicks.Pic was up on the rff classifieds recently and I liked it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height776Scene Capture TypeStandard
Boomers might sometimes have a bad eye, but the photoboomers I know are by and large very kind and generous dudes. I prefer their brand of gearfaggotry to the kind seen on /p/. The ones I know do not chase new gear nearly as much as the city-dwelling millennials who will pay two thousand dollars for a fucking point and shoot.
>>3900160it's the result of the obsession with lifting shadows, you end up with unnatural stuff
support ken rockwell and his glowing family[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:06:11 23:09:44Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3899941>isi may be many things but a tranny he's not.
>>3900175You ever meet boomer birders? Worst people on the planet.
>>3900181This shit is just vile dude. Knock it off already, there's so much real stuff you could use to pick on her and you use the one that's made up. There's also tons of actual trannies shitting up the board and yet you pick on isi.I say this as someone who used to parrot "trannies have no periods" on her threads. Calling isi a tranny is a crutch.
>>3899725>LET'S PLAY RAID SHADOWLEGENDS, START NOW FOR FREE
>>3899935>Horizon not even level>Blacks got murdered harder than the Zulu Nation>Whites blown the fuck out like Detroit in 1968>Sharpness + Clarity 100+
>>3899702>leadpaint.gifWhy do all boomers think all millennials and zoomers are the same
>>3900220The irony of this post, lol.
>>3900186isi is admittedly a tranny you tard. she memes about it.
>>3899725youtubers are fucking faggots i swear. cant believe normies watch this shit
>>3900364Who’s Isi? Some e-celeb?
>>3899620To be fair their idea of what makes photography interesting is probably informed by the people of their times, like Steve Curry who got famous for his Afghan Girl shot. It's kinda like how millennials and zoomers largely shoot "moody" city streets in rain or portraits with red and blue gels, or PNW landscapes. It's chasing clout, and being exposed to what's popular and having it affect how you shoot.
>>3900395It's not hard to stay anonymous on an anonymous board. Some people have too much ego for that though.
>>3899937That makes two of us. But desu getting good colors is easy on digital for me so that's not something I look to film for. What I do think film is good for personally is black and white. A pure monochrome film strip or sensor will always have superior output to a converted color shot, and with film you can just buy a roll or box instead of spending thousands on a monochrome digital camera.