post them[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3024Image Height2899Scene Capture TypeStandard
a man who shoots m43, apsc, ff and medium formatThis is what establishment fears.
>>3894960>Mamiya, Canon, Fuji, and.. Olympus?Ahh, a fellow gear hoarder, I see.
How much is a mamiya 7 nowadays, I don't even want to look
slight overlap[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeGoogleCamera ModelPixel 3aCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:04 17:21:03Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating59Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness2.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance1.51 mMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.44 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio1.5Scene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
>>3894972did someone say>hoarder?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width640Image Height480
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
>>3895061[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
>>3895064[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
>>3895066[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
>>3895068[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
>>3895070[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height960Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3895064>exactawow that has to be a rarity
>>3895104Reasonably, yeh. I am really curious about this one, though. The Varex name ran into trademark problems in the US. I have seen them sanded off. I have never seen them scratched out with a fucken pocketknife.
>>3895107goddamnit[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height960
>>3895112must be some kind of damage, I can't imagine them being sold like that.
>>3895114I'm thinking an early sales sample of some variety or something. There's just no way for the damage to have been localized so perfectly on the logo that oughtn't be there. Dunno, tho.
i have a 126 slr that i don't pack with me so i don't care about it very much and an olympus rangefinder i also don't use muchi don't actually own a nikon camera to go with that lensi'm getting a kiev 60 in the mail in a few days[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3895120i also have a minolta 9000 with a misaligned mirror box and dead aperture controls that's currently in the pile of things to get fixed with the c64[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.20Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:04 19:23:48Color Space InformationUncalibrated
>>3894960that mamiya looks like shit. u need to get it restored or something. it doesnt look weathered and cool with use either. just ugly and not maintained well
>>3895154lmao is this the most jellypoast seethe in /p/ history?????
>>3895157>jelly>of plastic fantastic mamiya 7kekI have an RB kid
>>3895154>just few dustgo to the doctor, schizo
>>3895158this has to be bait lol
>>3895159lol ok. cry more over your plastic toy. sorry it cant be fixed kek
>>3895158This is retarded but desu I'd rather a Fuji GF670 if I had to use a rangefinder (not my preference). The 7's lenses are just so slow and not nearly as sharp; nor is it as slim as the 670. And obviously if I fine with a MF SLR I'd go a 500C or RZ67. The image quality is just so much better.
>>3895163can't you afford one you?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3024Image Height2862Scene Capture TypeStandard
Through the Mamiya 7
>>3895172i don't know what ex-soviet republic this is but it is very goddamned aesthetic my friend
The two I use regularly.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera Model--Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)Sensing MethodUnknownImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:05 03:18:16Exposure Time1 secExposure ProgramNot DefinedBrightness1.6 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardAltitude0.00 mTime (UTC)00:00:00Date (UTC)0
>>3895172Are you that national geographic guy from the other thread
potential paper weights[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height960
>>3895196No idea why anyone would buy a contax, they're just insanely fragile and not overly special
>>3894960My mft lineupthe 14-140, 9-18 and 35-100 were gifted to me, I sold all my film stuff as scanning sucks and ruins the enjoyment. cant decide if get rid of the 12-60 or the superzoom, the 35-100 must also go.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeXiaomiCamera ModelM2007J20CGCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.9Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4624Image Height3472Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:05 00:16:41Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/1.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating770Lens Aperturef/1.9Brightness-3.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceD65FlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.43 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2253Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3895242great fucking little collection there anon
I'm not a gearfag and I'm actually just using my mom's old Sony Alpha 100 with the kit lens. I have no idea where to go if I even wanted a better camera or lens (I know I prefer wide-and lenses and very rarely use the zoom past 28mm). I learned (or started to learn I should say) how to take photos on my highschool's pentax k1000 with a fixed lens for b/w, and they also had canon cameras for digital photography but I don't remember any of the specs for those.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DCamera SoftwareACD Systems Digital ImagingPhotographerHolger FinkMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:01:04 18:39:38Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating500Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmImage Width1600Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3895071>>3895070look at all those poor cameras that will never get used again
Modest setup for now, since I've rectified a wrong and sold off the X-T4 and 16-80 f4 (underrated zoom IMO). Rebought a Z6 since they can be had for peanuts right now.
>>3895066>>3895068>>3895070>>3895071Shipment of 60 exacta guy? Have you managed to fix any and/or yet?
>>3895173my guess is italy
>>3895263Enjoy getting your camera repaired dickhead
i think there's like two kinds of collections that get replies here and it's like:- interesting utilitarian:the person actually uses their gear but has very weird taste - boneheaded retarded:the person owns like, ten plastic filmtastics and you can't understand how they would ever do photography.
>>3895070>>3895071what's gone so wrong in your life that you need to fill the hole in your soul with forgotten tip-destined cameras.what a fucking waste.
>>3894960>>3895196spot the nophoto gearwhores who just buy cameras as fashion accessories kek
Rate[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G960UCamera SoftwareG960USQS9FUC2Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.5Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4032Image Height3024Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:05 02:25:39Exposure Time1/10 secF-Numberf/1.5ISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/1.5Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length4.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024White BalanceAutoUnique Image IDH12QSKF00SM H12QSKL01VA
>>3895284>tip-destinedWhat did he mean by this
>>3895290Kino out of 10, based film man.
>>3895293That they're destination was the trash heap (tip), before anon horded them.
>>3895300Do you, by any chance, suck dick for breakfast?
>>3895300The whole point is to save them from the trash heap. I'm missing your point, I guess.
how am i supposed to take a photo of my camera with my camera you idiot
>>3895395>what is a mirrorAre you retarded?
>>3895206the 2/45 is the best lens I've ever used. Very sharp and had the perfect amount of global contrast that made pleasing images even in harsh light.
>>3894960digipleb that wanted to be hip so bought a mamiya 7 they rarely use>>3894981couldnt afford a leica>>3895058>>3895061>>3895064>>3895066>>3895068>>3895070>>3895071actually brain damaged>>3895120thrift store specials>>3895177concise>>3895196concise>>3895242i dunno what this shit even is>>3895255concise>>3895290concisenot bad so far anons. only a few of you are gearfag nophotos probably
I really only shoot macro and medium format these days
'74 'blad, 250mm and 80mm Chrome Tstar , 50mm FLE, 100mm 3.5, 105 UV Cf
>>3895526Cont'dCanon 7D, 6D Mkii, 24 105, 70 200 mk ii, 10 18 efs, 2x ii, 200mm 1.8, 28mm f2.0 Zeiss
>>3895413lol I could buy a Leica if I wanted to dawg
>>3895206Weird mine runs flawlessly after 8 years guess I got lucky? Sorry yours broke lol.
>>3895206The T's and TVS's are fragile because of the small components, but the G's are no more breakable than your typical 90's electronic camera. Mine's sat at about 7,000 frames, it had 5,600 when I bought it. I'm crossing my fingers that it'll be able to make it to 15,000 or hopefully even 20,000.
>>3895196you have great taste anon[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1125Image Height1500Scene Capture TypeStandard
i swear it didn't used to be like this.. I used to have an Olympus XA2, a Mamiya 645, a Canonet... I have a few other lenses not pictured, all older bargain AF-D stuff. But now I take more photos than ever. Selling one of the D700 bodies[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone SE (2nd generation)Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.1 (Windows)Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:06:06 17:25:23Exposure Time1/55 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length3.99 mmColor Space InformationsRGBExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3896537which mamiya model is this?
>>3895290r1! i love mine! mine goes with me everywhere
>>3896944thank you!amazing camera
>>3898138yeah it’s a great all-rounder
>>3897606Glad to know there is another R1 appreciator. Amazing camera, I got it for my EDC as well, it's performance is really stellar for how small it is.Pic related
Old and worn but still work fine
>>38982603rd R1 lover here. Was my EDC on construction sites. Fantastic camera.
I want to consooom more but I just can't justify buying anything given I have all the focal ranges covered pretty much. Or at least I consider the 41mm to be too close to 35 and 50 to buy more.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3898343Nice shot! Slide film is so pleasing to look at.
>>3898347Gather up the money that you would spend on a new lens/camera and put it towards a travel budget so you can actually go out and shoot.
>>3898347both cameras have the same sensor and processor, right?
>>3898347how do you find the xf10?
Pretty boring at the moment. I’ve owned so many cameras at this point and the X-T2 just packs the most punch for the price. Thinking about getting a DSLR; probably a Pentax.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height896
>>3899004Yes. Didn't really pick them for it though. >>3899005I've posted about it before and as much as I love how tiny it is I have a really hard time making 28mm work for me. I bought it for traveling though so we will see how it performs when I'm actually abroad instead of walking around my hometown
>>389901828mm and no viewfinder makes me feel like I'm using my phone so much that I would end up just using my phone.
>>3899024I'm somewhat okay with that. The IQ is significantly many times higher than my phone which is one of the better phones for photography. However you won't be making a lot of art with it. It feels like snapshitting
>>3898791I'm already doing that but thanks for the tip anyway. I will only bring my XF10 on my trips, or at least that's what I think I will do. Losing the X-T100 won't be a big problem seeing they're dirt cheap but having my lenses stolen would really screw me over and I plan on visiting Colombia.
>>3899018>>3899024bros, if you shoot jpeg only, you can use the 35, 50 crop modes. bought one mainly for the snapmode function and small size.
>>3899039my friend got robbed there while walking, bag with laptop taken away.
>>3899052Why can't foreigners never learn about environments? if it looks like an african refugee neighborhood it doesn't mean "it's their culture" because it's in another country, it means it's a danger zone filled with bad people.
>>3899073You can get mugged pretty much everywhere in South America.
>>3899073People report bags disappearing the moment they look the other way and muggings happening right within the historical centres of cities like Cartagena.
>>3899051What's the point of using those modes? Serious question seeing I can crop myself in post later on. It doesn't magically add pixels or something right?
>>3899005he puts it with his other cameras and remembers what it looks like. it really isn't hard.
>>3899018>we will see how it performs when I'm actually abroadwhy would it perform differently in another country? it will perform identically regardless of wherever you are. barring extremes like underwater or in the arctic.
Not pictured rb67, sx70, and a 100mm usm macro, as well as other film slr primes and my two godox strobes. but over all happy with this system for now. I Love how modular the sony is when it comes to lenses and Im hoping I’ll have enough saved up to get GFX100 and get the mamiya 7 adapter[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height958
>>3899220>all those meme camerasyou know you'd be better off with a 5D III than with two 5D IIs don't you?t. 5D II owner
>>3899224the one with the flash is a 5diii While the 5dii came extra with this lens bundle I purchased through facebook marketplace. The 1d classic i got exclusively for the ccd and its become my go to for photographing prints for auction. I dont see how the rest are memes the a7s is a darling and the mamiya 7 got me through college
>>3898273I heard the 6x9 has some retarded version of bulb mode. I’m thinking of getting one, I rented one out in college and was surprised by how beautiful the images came out. How do you like yours anon?
>>3899245im retarded thats a 6x7 not a 6x9
>>3899243>ccd>medium format rangefindersmemes alright
>>3899095crop modes if IQ isn't a priority and can't be bothered by doing post. I guesstimate at 35mm is 19mp, 50mm is 13mp. the camera auto resizes the cropped jpegs to 24mp so IQ falls more in 50mm. cropping in post is still better especially in raw if you prioritize IQ.
>>3899155Because like I said before right now I lug it around my hometown and it obviously performs subpar compared to an interchangeable lens camera with a lens that cost twice the XF10. However it has certain qualities (it's the size of a phone with an APS-C sensor) which might make it a 10/10 camera while on travels due to it's size to IQ ratio.
>>3899625The image quality isn't magically going to get better when you're traveling though. It makes literally no sense. It performs as well as it will right now.
>>3899705You're a fucking pendantic faggotAn inflatable mattress lies the same everywhere but I rather have it with me abroad than at home.
>>3899708Yeah it would be exactly as comfortable everywhere. So the analog would be you saying "I got this air mattress, I slept on it at home and it isn't very comfortable but we'll see how comfortable it is when I'm traveling." Like it doesn't fucking matter where you are, it will be equally as comfortalble. There's literally nothing that you have to wait to figure out.
>>3899715When you are abroad and your options are to lie on the floor, some tiny self-inflating matress or a fully inflatable one suddenly the latter is the most comfortable option. I take it you bring your cargo shorts and Nikon everywhere you go but I like having something I can bring everywhere without being afraid of damaging/getting robbed/losing it/whatever which still gives me many times more quality than my phone.
>>3899717You seem to think I'm criticizing your decision to buy gear for travel. I don't care what you buy. If you want a compact camera for travel, that's a perfectly valid decision.What I'm pointing out is, again, the actual quality of the camera doesn't change when you travel, which is what you're saying over and over again. Just like the comfort of the mattress doesn't change when you travel.I'm not saying "don't buy the camera" or "don't bring the mattress." I'm saying "you are fully equipped to judge their utility in your current situation."
>>3899730But if you're somewhere new, your photography often changes from trying to create art to recording memories. Also, 28mm in an unfamiliar, picturesque is much more useful and effective compared with your hometown. Not him, btw. I just also only use 28mm equivalent when travelling.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS CORPORATIONCamera ModelPEN-FCamera SoftwareVersion 3.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2019:06:01 11:31:08Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length25.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1087Image Height722RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3899749Oops, pic unrelated. I could've sworn I only took my 14mm lens to Skye with me...
>>3894981based KLASSE chad
>>38949605/10 saved by the Mamiya>>3894981Nice>>3895058>>3895064>>3895066>>3895068>>3895070>>3895071>>3895112Are you building a shelter with all those bricks?>>3895196gud>>3895242not even useful>>3895255good>>3895290useful>>3895467gud>>3895524gud>>3895526>>3895528"Sauron's Eye" fag. Based lens! great >>3896537Perfect.>>3896644Nippon has a Nikon museum.>>3898273hm>>3898347bankrupt hipster>>3898567just sell the nikon>>3899009gud>>3899220Anon has a low income wedding photography job
>>3895177Is that 5d classic?
Any LF shooters left on /p/?
>>3894960Not pictured:-A second Minolta 110 SLR (being repaired)-Kodak Disc 6000 (in the mail)-a shitton of 110 cartridges
>>3899892i'm thinking based tbqhfam
>>3894960cringe>>3894981based poorfag>>3895058>>3895061>>3895064>>3895066>>3895068>>3895070>>3895071You guys need help>>3895120>>3895290based>>3896644dangerously based fellow nikon fag>>3899009Cringe get an value FF DSLR from nikon or canon>>3899889Post gear, saving up for a intrepid 4x5
>>3895071>>3895070Something tells me you own a repair shop
>>3899897I own what will someday become the United States' premiere Exakta / Pentacon / Zeiss Ikon repair shop. All I need to do now is figure out how to fix them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>3899893Thanks. I have a weakness for dinky, obtuse things and I don't know why. Cars, cameras, anything that looks odd I want. Oh, I also have a pocket instamatic 10 (pic related) but unfortunately it's a shelf piece; the sensor switch is snapped off.The 110 format is surprisingly fun when you work with the graininess of the film. But with all the cameras in that format being 30 years old minimum with no new manufacturers aside from Lomography, you'd be hard pressed to consistently find cameras that work.
>>3899906My first camera was a 110. I loved that stupid thing. I always see the 110s on the fleabay and I always wonder who still shoots it. I am glad to see it.
Goodness gracious the iPhone 12 Pro camera is such a piece of shit. It couldn't handle not blowing out the top of the chrome cameras or exposing the dark table properly. This is the first picture I've taken of all my cameras because I've never wanted to do it with a smartphone.
>>3899908>Censored SonyThis is pretty suspicious
>>3899910The logos were kind of attention grabbing. I decided to try joining tape gang for more subtle street shooting.
>>3899907Honestly I think most of the older cameras are sold as collection pieces given how relatively scare the film is. Add to that repair costs and actually being able to find a shop that can service the camera, and eesh. That being said I plan to use my cameras till the wheels fall off, and hopefully I can keep them in good enough condition on my own till then.
>>3899912Kek imagine believing this crap>>3899910Tape of shame lol
>>3899855Yes, I use it for work.
>>3899916I don't know if it makes a difference or not, I wouldn't say I believe it. I did it and liked it which is enough for me. I think the camera looks better than with a big loud SONY across the top.
>>3899009Pour one out for Samsung. >tfw NX1 is too expensive and rare used now
>>3895066What an absolute sad sack leaving all those sensors exposed. NGMI.
>>3898273Based and 80-200L 2.8 pilled
>>3900018n g l i kekt
I am purging many of my recent acquisitions because none of them have the ability to stand up to Exaktas. I didn't shoot with any of these because the idea of a TLR is simply too absurd.
>>3899894thanks fellow nikon-fag, love your lenses and considering both. One of my lenses is an old 35-105 but I find it a bit too slow and a bit too soft in the corners
>>3900038I'm not a super huge fan of the afd 35-70 f/2.8, but its a killer value. The manual lenses are all pretty affordable and perform super well. I really would like a 35mm f/2 and 85mm f/2, then I'll have a complete kit.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern842Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution1600 dpiVertical Resolution1600 dpiImage Created2021:04:30 17:01:23Exposure Time1/4000 secF-Numberf/1.4Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.4Exposure Bias-1/2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3900117Nice. I briefly had a 28-70 2.8 which was quite nice but absurdly bulky and since I'm mostly doing street shooting I couldn't justify keeping it. I am constantly thinking about swapping my 28 f/2.8 for a 35 f/2 but I'm not sure if its really worthwhile. I feel that the 28mm perspective has become a part of my shooting style and I worry that 35 is just too similar to 50mm. I have also been shopping around for an 85 f1.8 but at this point I'm wondering if the 105 f2.8 is a better one to go for for portraiture.
>>3899834>just sell the NikonYea actually thinking about that. I got it used for a really good price but I already had the X100V at the time. Started thinking I needed to explore more focal lengths. I’ve used the Nikon maybe twice.
>>3900150I feel like your x100 has enough convenience/usability features that the d3xxx series isn't going to be enough camera for you to have fun with. If you want to explore focal lengths I would suggest you pick up an older full frame body like a d610, I bet it would be significantly more fun for you, and the older af-s lenses are quite affordable
>>3900122I think that 35mm is a pretty boring focal length desu. I rarely find myself using the wider range of my zoom. I honestly rarely use my 28mm, I find it too wide most of the time. 50mm is probably my fav focal length. I think that 105mm is a little long for portraits, but its a necessity for scanning film. Super killer lens, sharp even wide open.
>>3899997It was an NX300 that got me into photography in the first place!This PAS Samsung is surprisingly good though. I bought it as a digishit CCD cam and it actually has a nice lens.
>>3900154Thanks for the suggestion I’ll check it out!
pretty happy with what I’ve got, feels comfy[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1280Image Height922
>>3900528>Fuji+RBI imagine you as a thin basedboy with massive arms.
>>3900544I'm actually a pretty unbased trannywith twig arms
>>3900528>DARK SLIDE.Is that to remind you to remove the dark slide? lol.
>>3900528mamiya 6 made me LOL
>>3900568suicide is the fast road to bulking trannybro give it a whirl
>>3900744yeah, the electronics in my rz are toast so the interlock system doesn't work. got tired of rerolling film, so far the sticker has helped>>3900755yeah it feels like every camera has its purpose, can't imagine buying another until one of them breaks >>3900820:v
>>3900827sick thanks 4 the tip
>>3900832I reckon you could do with a DSLR but if it doesn't suit your shooting style, that's fine too. Do you have more lenses for your various systems? God I wish I had picked up an RZ when I had the chance
>>3899894>>3900117hey fellow nikonfag what do you think of the 70-210 f4-5.6? I am thinking about selling my 80-200 2.8 zoom and getting that for my telephoto zoom, paired with a fast prime like the 105 2.8 or 180 2.8
>>3900867whoops sorry I'm an idiot I forgot about your xt-2. My lens question still stands
Nikon <3[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2020:09:20 03:30:59Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.7Exposure Bias0 EVFocal Length25.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height960RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain Up
>>3900867>>3900869I actually do have a 5dii but it's more of a keepsake these days. I only use it if I'm in a studio setting which is not often. currently I only have a 127 and 180 for my rz, the lens on my xt2 is a generic chinese 35 because I'm poor lol but I do have a bunch of m42 lenses I adapt >>3900915quite the kit
>>3900867oh also, if you pair an electronically broken rz body with some rb lenses (like the k/l line) then you can have a pretty cheap and nice kit, you just lose the ability to have ae, z lenses, and body interlock, although I guess it's more like an rb acting like an rz. that's what I did and I'm pretty happy, got it all for less than half the price of a banged up rz kit, and it's nice to have the modern body, single wind, and physical blinders of the rz.but yeah, my friend back in school bought an rz kit, near mint, for like, 250 canadian in 2016, camera shops struggled to get rid of them things back then...
>>3899245I really like mine but it has some stuff to be aware of before buying.6x7 vs. 6x9 is largely a matter of personal taste but aside from the frame size they are essentially identical.Lens is generally sharp, mine has a bit of haze in it so contrast suffers if shooting towards a light source. The rangefinder patch is a little small so it can be difficult to line up complex scenes without an obvious feature to align it.You have to pull the front of the lens forward to get at shutter speed and aparture adjustments so square filters are too much hassle to use.There's a shutter release on the body which you can trip by accident if you're not careful (you'll learn pretty fast).It's fucking huge if you're used to 35mm SLRs and mostly made out of plastic so feels quite light and is surprisingly easy to carry about for an extended period of time.
>>3900133Why do people buy these shit animals as pets and why the fuck do their owners all think the rest of the world wants to see them
>>3900868I've never shot either of those lenses, but Rockwell says that 80-200 is better lens in everyway except for size and price. So idk why you'd want to downgrade. I have the 105mm f/2.8 macro lens and its super sharp, its a little long for portraits, but too short for birding or sports, but a killer macro lens. >>3900915Damn, I'm impressed. Do you like the f5? Kinda thinking of getting one, how well does it work with manual lens?
>>3901024unironically personality-changing brain parasites, anon
>>3900983thanks>>3901163>Damn, I'm impressed. Do you like the f5? Kinda thinking of getting one, how well does it work with manual lens?Thanks. It's great even with a manual lens but it shines with autofocus lenses. Planning on selling it now cause I already have an F90x though.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.4Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4032Image Height3024Image OrientationBottom, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:21 20:59:12Exposure Time1/10 secF-Numberf/1.5Lens Aperturef/1.5Exposure Bias0 EVFocal Length4.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDJ12LLKL00SM
>>3901016Good to know thanks anon!Also you can use old nikon FE/FM Series view finder attachments as long as they're 19 inch they screw in perfectly. was considering getting a right angle viewer if I purchase either the 6x9 6x7 heavily leaning on the 6x9
>>390101619mm i mean
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:06:14 20:07:15Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3901508Im jelly for that F3.Why two H1s?
>>3895123real tech, you have my respect
I recently got a second body and it opened up my mind.You can't have one camera for everything. Having multiple cameras focused on one task is where it's at.
>>3902038Can you elaborate your use cases for both?
>>3902041Well I've been wanting to get a hybrid camera for a long time, but the features I wanted was out of budget in one single camera.So now I've sort of split it up into a stock and light a6300 for af photo and a rigged 5d3 for video.
>>3901516Honestly having two bodies on you makes life so much easier for gigs. Highly recommend everybody do this
This is a lot grainier than I wanted it to be because I didn't bother lighting it properly. I limited it to just the cameras I've actually shot in 2021 so as to not be here all day.Col 1: Canon EOS 5D Mark III, Sony A7II, Sony A6000, Leica M9Col 2: Canon Rebel XS, Lumix GF5, Sigma DP2 Merrill, Fuji X-T1Col 3: Nikon D700, Nikon FG, Nikon N90sCol 4: Rolfix 1, Yashica A, Mamiya 645 SuperCol 5: Mamiya RB67, Kiev-6CCol 6: Canon EOS RT, Canon EOS Elan 7NENot pictured: The Canon 70D that I took the picture with, and the Canon EOS 850 (really old film SLR that makes a first-gen film Rebel look super advanced) that I didn't want to dig out of its drawer.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 70DMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating10000Shutter Speed1/250 secExposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedExposure ModeAuto
>>3902346Damn, man. That's a lot of cameras. How do you like your M9? I'm considering getting one.
>>3902603>How do you like your M9? I'm considering getting one.I personally love it, but they are Not For Everyone.Some thoughts about it off the top of my head:1. Battery life is surprisingly shitty, closer to a mirrorless camera (which, technically, it is) than a DSLR even though it doesn't run the sensor all the time like mirrorless cameras.2. It's pretty clunky ergonomically3. Takes a beat to turn on after it wakes up from sleep, again more like a mirrorless than a DSLR for some reason4. ISO maxes out at 2500, and ISO 2500 is pretty ugly. Not unusable, but not nearly as clear as 2500 on a modern full frame CMOS camera. 5. Sensor corrosion is a thing, but not really a big deal in my experience so far (my sensor has a few spots, but they're mostly small enough in photos that they're not noticeable)6. Close focusing just isn't a thing on a rangefinder, so don't expect to use this to take pictures of small things close up.7. The LCD is surprisingly shitty, even for a camera of the M9's vintage8. Don't believe the hype that an M9 CCD sensor produces noticeably better--or, really, even noticeably different--images than modern CMOS sensors. If you don't include exif, no one will know you're shooting with an M9.9. Rangefinder focusing takes a lot of getting used to. In use, it very much has the feel of shooting with an old-school film camera, but with the advantage that you don't have to deal with film. So if you like that shooting experience--which I do--it's great. If not, it's a shitty, expensive, heavy camera that's less useful and technologically advanced than a Digital Rebel.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLeica Camera AGCamera ModelM9 Digital CameraMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)90 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiF-Numberf/3.4Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Shutter Speed1/750 secExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFocal Length90.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedExposure ModeManual
>>3902740Good info. Thanks for taking the time.
My humble collection. Don't need more desu.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerCiikAImage-Specific Properties:
>>3902740I haven't used an M9, but having shot on a lot of CCD sensors, you don't find them to have a unique color rendition? I always loved the colors on the old Nikon CCD cameras I shoot.
I don't like to have a lot of cameras[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 6sCamera Software14.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)34 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:06:19 18:37:13Exposure Time1/33 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating64Lens Aperturef/2.2Brightness4.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.15 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3024Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3904202It's not the CCD, it's the strong color filter array optimized for color accuracy instead of dynamic range. There's CCD cameras with colors that aren't great and CMOS cameras with "CCD colors" like the 5D classic or the D2X. Sensors are monochrome. You either optimize the CFA for color accuracy or SNR. That said, when comparing A to B samples the M9 colors do look a bit richer than the Typ 240's.
>>3904202>you don't find them to have a unique color renditionNot really, no. I suspect that this is more a matter of psychology--I.e., you find them to have a unique color rendition because you're expecting them to. That being said, it's certainly possible that it's just that my eyes aren't great. If there is a difference, though, it's certainly not an unmistakably obvious and dramatic one.
Ma ole lady.
>>3904419Is the fuji pano even worth it? so much money for niche, I am jelly though.
>>3899892I want to hurt you.Nice collection!
>>3904495yeah it's a lot of fun! it's pretty niche but it's a fun niche. it's basically built for landscapes at infinity, it's not like an xpan at all. there are some other alternative 6x17 pano cameras out there like the dayi 617 that have features more in-line with an LF camera. the g617 is nice for the convenience of loading and winding compared to the others.it wasn't that expensive when i got it, i bought it off KEH in mid-2019 for ~1100.
>>3895070can i have one?
How much are your entire collections worth? Mine is about £1200.
>>3905144Paid ~$5k for this >>3894981Prob could sell it all for at least double.
>>3904496I have a third Minolta 110 Zoom SLR coming in soon.
>>3895249Based a-mount shooter. I have a Sony alpha that I’m still hanging onto because it doesn’t have monetary value anymore, and I have my grandfather’s Minolta Maxxum 7000, if I ever decide to shoot film.
>>3904419>wiimote wriststraplove it