[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1620029499453[1].jpg (1.92 MB, 2000x1025)
1.92 MB
1.92 MB JPG
>>>/xs/41689
>>
>>3877075
imagine wasting expensive slides on a bunch of manchildren larpers
>>
>>3877081
Imagine being a nophoto cunt.
>>
>>3877081
Imagine being a nophoto larper.
>>
>>3877081
imagine thinking slides are expensive.
imagine thinking taking photos with film is a waste.
imagine being you.
>>
>>3877075
Looks nice, but why would you load regular 35mm film into a panoramic camera ? Just for the borders visual effect ?
>>
>>3877075
the comments in that thread are just golden.
>>>/xs/41764
>>>/xs/41771
>>>/xs/41894
>>
Test
>>
>>3877098
Because its the one he had with him.
>>
>>3877098
How about you run a roll of 35mm through your panoramic camera and report back on your findings?
>>
>>3877111
>>3877098
Isn't it better to load a full frame film and crop it however you like ?
>>
>>3877117
please stop posting
>>
>>3877117
Because its a bigger format than a cropped fullframe and he couldn't afford the xpan and most other panoramic camera don't have a telephoto lens.
>>
>>3877117
How about you fucking DO IT and FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF instead of QUESTIONPOSTING like a fucking RETARD?
>>
>>3877098
>Looks nice, but why would you load regular 35mm film into a panoramic camera ? Just for the borders visual effect ?
Since no one else is actually explaining it:

What he did was he loaded 35mm film into a medium format camera (i.e., a camera that's designed to shoot in a format larger than 35mm). So it's not a panoramic camera per se; he's just shooting panoramic photos in it by using a narrower film format than the camera is designed for.

Most 35mm cameras with a "panoramic" option actually just crop in so you're getting *smaller* frames with the top and bottom cropped out. This lets you get larger frames. And some people like the aesthetic with the sprocket holes in the photo.

>>3877117
>Isn't it better to load a full frame film and crop it however you like ?
And to this: It depends on what you're going for. If you're wanting panoramic photos like this, you're going to be wasting a lot of expensive medium format film to get cropped panoramics. Plus, by limiting yourself to the panoramic format, it forces you to think in terms of that composition rather than just falling back into the camera's native aspect ratio.
>>
>>3877124
Dude, fuck off. Just because you already know the answers to the questions he's asking doesn't mean that he's stupid for asking the questions.
>>
>>3877126
No, actually, he very much is fucking stupid for asking questions. This isn't Google; it's a fucking photography board, and the answers to his questions are totally self-evident to anyone who isn't literally fucking retarded. If he were actually curious he'd spend ten seconds thinking about it instead of being a questionpoaster. If he were actually a photographer he'd just fucking DO IT. You're a retard-enabler and providing easy answers to lazy assholes makes the world a worse place. Fuck him and fuck you.
>>
>>3877123
>couldn't afford the xpan
implying the xpan is expensive.
>>
>>3877081
Imagine wasting time, money and technology just to be toxic on the internet
>>
>>3877127
>No, actually, he very much is fucking stupid for asking questions
He's really not.

> the answers to his questions are totally self-evident to anyone who isn't literally fucking retarded
They're really not.

If you've only got experience with 35mm cameras, you'll know that 35mm cameras don't generally go out to the sprockets. If you've got experience with 35mm and medium format, you'll know 35mm doesn't go out to the sprockets and that 35mm doesn't generally fit in medium format cameras. It's pretty specialized knowledge on top of pretty specialized knowledge to know that you can get a little plastic set of adapters to let you run 35mm through a 120 camera.

Plus, most people in the year of our lord 2021 haven't even shot film, much less film in those old "panoramic" cameras that just crop in.

And if you don't have a lot of experience shooting, you won't have first-hand experience that tells you that shooting for the specific output format you want (e.g., loading 35mm into an RB67 to get panoramics instead of just cropping down the native 6x7, or by loading black and white film to make you think in terms of light and shadow and ignore color), you might not realize why someone might want to do that.

> You're a retard-enabler and providing easy answers to lazy assholes makes the world a worse place. Fuck him and fuck you.
Another way to put it: I'm fostering discussions about photography on a photography board. I'm helping people become better and more knowledgable photographers. You're just being an asshole for the sake of being an asshole. Fuck off with that bullshit.
>>
>>3877136
https://lmgtfy.app/#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=why%20would%20you%20load%20regular%2035mm%20film%20into%20a%20panoramic%20camera
Literally the first three links. There is no discussion to be had. What "discussion" are you going to have other than to explain the obvious? Where does a discussion go when the answer to "why would I press that button" is "in order to start the engine"? Literal 3-year-old shit. Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Inane.
>>
>>3877133
Not him, but I'd get one if it was fully mechanical.
>>
>>3877138
>Literally the first three links
The first three links that come back for me when I google that:

(Videos)
1. 35mm panoramic cameras, real vs fake.
2. How to load a 35mm film camera.
3. How to load 35mm film into a Mamiya 6MF for panoramic photos.

#1 and #3 are adjacent to what he's confused about, but they don't really answer his actual question. #2 is straight up irrelevant.

Actual links:
A. How to take panoramic photos on a 35mm film camera without cropping
B. Photographing Machu Picchu on a panorama film camera
C. How To - 35mm Panoramic Film Images

These go more into the *how* and not the *why*. And this guy was at a point where he doesn't seem to actually understand that there's not special panoramic film and that it's all either 35mm or 120 shot with a panoramic aspect ratio.

In fact, if you don't understand that the answers to his questions were somewhat nuanced and therefore not something simple and easy to google, maybe you're not nearly as smart as you think you are?
>>
>>3877127
>If he were actually a photographer he'd just fucking DO IT
why?
>>3877117
Depends. If you don't mind the part you don't expose and the sprockets, it's cheaper. And some people like the sprockets aesthetics.
>>
>>3877133
>implying the xpan is expensive.
They cost thousands of dollars. Whether you personally can afford one or not, it's ridiculous to imply that that doesn't count as expensive for a film camera.
>>
>>3877125
Thank you.
>>
>>3877081
>>3877082
blown the fuck out
>>
>>3877138
>tries to be highschool snarky with lmgtfy
>can't post working link
>>
>>3877138
chill out bro there's no need to sperg out this hard on a mongolian basket weaving forum lmao
>>
>>3877138
you literally failed at posting a boomer-tier troll link lol
>>
>>3877081
Oh no, 20 bucks
>>
>>3877075
what a waste of film
>>
>>3877700
Once buck would be too much. And pressing the shutter just once would be a waste of calories to be honest.
>>
>>3878493
These pictures are probably better than any picture you’ve ever taken.
>>
File: 07440029.jpg (2.88 MB, 3090x2048)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB JPG
>>3877075
are you gonna post more?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.10.011 (130930)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3090
Image Height2048
>>
>>3877075
This is a really cool shot, Australia guy.
>>
>>3878509
This isn't my thread, but there are more in the /fgt/ thread

>>3878518
Thanks
>>
>>3877082
>>3877083
>>3877097
>>3877135
>>3877273
>>3877700
cry more children also samefag
>>
File: 2aa.jpg (23 KB, 600x600)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>3878660
"Its one guy"
>>
>>3877125
damn thanks for the explanation anon.
>>
>>3878540
I saw them, they’re reel neeto



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.