[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 95 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!

Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: lights.jpg (1.01 MB, 4000x2667)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB JPG
Just post pics and talk about them

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6400
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)112 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2021:04:08 03:24:37
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Brightness4.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length75.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3858560
No composition
Under exposed
No subject
Just a bunch of lights hanging from a scaffolding in Manhattan

Looks like the first picture I'd take as an early beginner


My point is you probably saw something with your eyes but couldn't translate it to a photography.
>>
>>3858588
Well I was just snapping pics on the way to work, didn't have all day to stand there framing it up so I just set focus on the front bulb and set the exposure until it looked ok. Also I lowered the brightness in GIMP because I thought it looked a bit more moody.
>>
>>3858594
What I mean is it's just a bunch of lights
There's nothing to get out of this picture.
>>
File: pillars.jpg (1.63 MB, 2667x4000)
1.63 MB
1.63 MB JPG
>>3858588
Here's another shot, I like the way the pillars are staggered here, and the text on the foremost is nice

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6400
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)91 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2021:04:08 04:38:35
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Brightness2.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length61.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4000
Image Height6000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3858596
Well I was seeing how much bokeh I could get from my cheapo superzoom, not everything has to be a masterpiece
>>
File: bulb.jpg (849 KB, 4000x2667)
849 KB
849 KB JPG
>>3858596
Also here's a closeup, I think this looks a lot better

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6400
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)202 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2021:04:08 05:03:16
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Brightness3.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length135.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3858560
I think it's alright

>>3858588
>Under exposed
It's dark sometimes during the day, you know.
You don't have to overpull all shadows.
>>
>>3858594
>GIMP'd the brightness
Could you post the unedited one?
>>
File: 2021_0407_07341200.jpg (1.37 MB, 1776x1184)
1.37 MB
1.37 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX100F
Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X100F Ver2.11
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Maker Note Version0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:04:07 07:34:12
Exposure Time1/180 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Brightness4.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length23.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1776
Image Height1184
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessSoft
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
SharpnessSoft
White BalanceDaylight
Chroma SaturationUnknown
Flash ModeUnknown
Focus ModeAuto
Slow Synchro ModeOff
Picture ModeProgram AE
Continuous/Bracketing ModeOff
Blur StatusOK
Focus StatusOK
Auto Exposure StatusOK
>>
File: eh.jpg (541 KB, 3228x1099)
541 KB
541 KB JPG
>>3858766
I like the little patch of flowers in the tree, also its kindof weird how they have the grass trimmed in the front, there's sidewalk squares in the grass

>>3858758
Honestly, I'm looking at the unedited one and there's no real appreciable difference, I might be slightly retarded but I literally remember turning the brightness down

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution56 dpcm
Vertical Resolution56 dpcm
Image Created2021:04:08 10:11:48
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>3858832
Oh the change is mostly under the canopy, some of the beams are less visible
>>
>>3858560
OP, why did you make a critique thread if all you’re going to do is argue with people?
>>
>>3858832
Hmmm is your pic anamorphic?
>>
>>3858588
>No composition
>Under exposed
>No subject
none of that shit matters, I like it
>>
>>3858832
Yea there really isn't a whole lot of difference there.
>>
>>3858843
I don't know man I just wanted to make a thread and post some pics, and see some that other people took. Just now got a decent camera for video work and I'm starting to get into photography, so I thought I'd just chit chat with some people here
>>
>>3858588
All subjective. Post objective criticism of it or stfu. I like OPs pic
>>
File: lights2.jpg (2.36 MB, 4000x2667)
2.36 MB
2.36 MB JPG
Here's one from outside Grand Central station

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6400
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)202 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2021:04:08 04:44:09
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1600
Brightness0.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length135.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3858848
>>3858907
would you frame it?
would you pay money for it?
This is literally a "I just got my camera" tier photo.

>>3858907
>All subjective. Post objective criticism of it or stfu.
all art is subjective wtf do you mean? can you tell us why you like it? at least the other anon said why he didn't.

>>3858594
>Well I was just snapping pics on the way to work, didn't have all day to stand there framing it up so I just set focus on the front bulb and set the exposure until it looked ok.
see. this is why it's not a good photo. you reap what you sow. you took the photo hastily and got the results that comes with doing a snapshot. next time you're out ask yourself why you're taking a shot. wonder what you're trying to say. ask yourself what could make the shot better. If you're just snapping for the sake of snapping because you want to justify being out with your camera, you're not doing it right. When you bring the viewfinder to your eye, you should already have the shot all framed up in your mind.

tl;dr Shoot with purpose.
>>
>>3858603
>Well I was seeing how much bokeh I could get from my cheapo superzoom, not everything has to be a masterpiece
why are you asking for criticism on a test shot? why do you have to be so defensive?

>>3858843
this.
>>
>>3858919
I like the contrast between the flowers and the lights. Objective criticism are things like "this is not in focus". "this could be sharper". The photo has a subject and composition, you just don't like it. Photographers have their heads so far up their asses jesus christ
>>
>>3858935

i dont even... you really should grow some thicker skin, friend. it's objectively shit
>>
>>3858621
Yes, it is better because there is an apparent motif. I understand here at least what the photographer saw. But still, the result is boring, too simple. Yes, it is better because there is an apparent motif. I understand here at least what the photographer saw. But still, the result is boring, too simple. But I myself have no idea how to photograph this excitingly or show something exciting about it. Maybe a reflection in the glass, but that's already gymnastics, because it creates rather a substitute motif.
>>
>>3858941
>dumbass on /p/ can't fathom that art is subjective and that something they might hate looks great to others (and it's not a matter of having a "skilled" eye)

never change /p/
>>
File: 9.jpg (1.58 MB, 3675x3675)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB JPG
i took this the other day, i quite like it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.2 (Macintosh)
PhotographerVictor Buus
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:04:05 20:06:44
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating12800
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3675
Image Height3675
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3859247
The window looks perfectly broken, almost out of a comic book, I also like the beam of light showing the debris on the floor
>>
>>3858904
So you didn’t want a critique thread at all, but a jerk-off session
>>
>>3859783
you cant be serious, every thread here is a jerkoff session
>>
File: IMG_0115.jpg (1002 KB, 1129x1129)
1002 KB
1002 KB JPG
Rate it from 0 to generic brutalist building shot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2020:11:16 15:55:55
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/9.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating125
Lens Aperturef/9.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length21.27 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3859951
>generic brutalist building
This meme needs to die, retarded normal cattle can't distinguish a victorian house from a post-modernist museum.
>>
Lmao
>>
>>3859951
That's not even brutalism
>>
it's an almost textbook example of a brutalist buidling, one of the many built by the communists in my country after the war. It isn't one of the fancy ones, or the interesting ones, but its definitely brutalist.

> Brutalist buildings are characterised by minimalist constructions that showcase the bare building materials and structural elements over decorative design.[4][5] The style commonly makes use of exposed concrete or brick, angular geometric shapes and a predominantly monochrome colour palette;

Check, check and check.
>>
>>3860014
>it's an almost textbook example of a brutalist buidling
It's apparent concrete "apparent"?
>No
Built by the communists but is that a factor into making it brutalist?
>Actually no
It isn't one of the fancy ones, or the interesting ones, so is its mundane nature part of the brutalism?
>No
Then it isn't you stupid donkey humper.

>Brutalist buildings are characterised by minimalist constructions
False, see works of their founders: Marcel Breuer, Charles Jeanneret, Paul Rudolph
>showcase the bare building materials and structural elements over decorative design
True, the structural work is in part the decorative design based on bewilderment
>makes use of exposed concrete or brick, angular geometric shapes and a predominantly monochrome
Partially false, it is usually concrete only but usually textured, can or cannot be monochrome, it depends.
>Check, check and check.
Your picture does not check them because it breaks with the rules. You are an illiterate gorilla nigger, fuck your school and its playground.
>>
File: IMG_20201116_161919_744.jpg (3.43 MB, 5472x3648)
3.43 MB
3.43 MB JPG
>>3860017
Lol no. Just because the most famous examples stand out from the norm (that's why they are famous) doesn't mean that they are the norm.
Barebone, blocky, concrete, monotone, tall buildings are a staple for any city that was into brutalist architecture.
>>
>>3858910
Just the right amount of exposure for a nighttime (+rainy?) shot, and I like that the line of lights actually leads somewhere (the East 42nd Street sign). I wish the lights formed a tighter line – the large gap between the first and second light makes them seem disjointed. Maybe a different focal length at a different angle would make the lights look more like a single, cohesive line. Another complaint is that the biggest and most prominent light is out of focus, so it makes it feel even more disconnected from the other lights.

Good shot but I think it could be even better.
>>
>>3860024
>Just because the most famous examples stand out from the norm
The famous examples, all hundreds of them, do not stand out, they ARE the norm, hence why they set their style aside from the usual international modernism.
>Barebone, blocky, concrete, monotone
Concrete and barebones are the only attributes from brutalism, what you are referencing is the International Style cheaply done.
>>
>>3859951
I give it a solid 8, there's a lot of variation throughout which makes it more interesting than the usual burnout building shot. I like the angle and the sporadic placement of the air conditioners
>>
>>3860027
Well I wanted to capture the linear decrease in gap between the lights from that point of view, I think maybe if I got closer to the wall It would improve the look. Next time I'm out there I'll take another shot and compare
>>
>>3858603
>>3858947
hi im two days late to this thread but i wanna point out the level of retardation here
>>
>>3860027
Lmao what the fuck are you people talking about
You’re all nutjobs
>>
>>3858560
post raw?
>>
File: niggers.jpg (305 KB, 4000x2667)
305 KB
305 KB JPG
>>3858560
It's underexposed

Here's my edit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6400
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)112 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4000
Image Height2667
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2021:04:10 17:30:07
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness4.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length75.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width4000
Image Height2667
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: DSC_3706-HDR.jpg (2.06 MB, 2048x1365)
2.06 MB
2.06 MB JPG
I was hikking a few days ago and this place looked nice to try a HDR photo.
Rate please.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 4.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern824
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)16 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:10 12:37:40
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Exposure Bias-2 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length11.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3860453
looks just like google street view congrats !
>>
>>3860442
Now that's just over exposed.
I'll let you in on a little secret any photo that looks like it's properly exposed is over exposed and most that look under exposed are objectively more accurate and faithful.

Shitty LCDs don't match real world contrast so copelets use curves and other memes to simulate it at the cost of compressing highlights and shit. Like your edit. It looks washed out now and garbage.

Increase the brighrness of your monitor not the image. That's where people fuck up so badly in photos. They want overpowering brightness in details on a dim screen and wind up butchering the actual image to simulate that.
>>
>>3860442
lmao you made it way worse, the exposure was fine before
>>
>>3860453
awful
post RAW?
>>
>>3860483
>>3860725
kek thanks for your honesty
first time using a wide angle lens so yeah.. I don't know how to manage it yet
I shooted RAW using bracketing exposure and then I stacked the 3 photos in 1
>>
>>3858600

Framing is all off, there is no empty space on the left side for the columns to lead to, it sort of just abruptly hits the edge of the frame, also the text is a good contrast to the pillars but takes up a bit too much space and in a weird position in the overall photo
>>
>>3858919
>would you frame it?
>would you pay money for it?
>This is literally a "I just got my camera" tier photo.
Be honest, even the best photographer couldn't make something worthy of framing with that scene. Maybe some super macro but you need a lens for that.
>>
>>3860857
can you post a single exposure without HDR memes?
I'm sure the scene would look good with a properly processed RAW from a single good exposure.
>>
File: IMG_20210330_143854.jpg (1.35 MB, 3264x2448)
1.35 MB
1.35 MB JPG
CRIT PLS

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeBlackBerry
Camera ModelBlackBerry Classic
Camera SoftwareBlackBerry 10.3.3.3216
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time399/1000000 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
ISO Speed Rating103
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.10 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3264
Image Height2448
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: oberammer.jpg (1004 KB, 667x1000)
1004 KB
1004 KB JPG
>>3860453
the stair leads the eyes good enough I suppose, but there's really not much of an interest/subject

>>3860973
y

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.20
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:10:17 18:17:51
Exposure Time1 sec
F-Numberf/9.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/9.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length40.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3860453
crooked looks terrible here, also perfectly wrong shutter speed for the waterfall, either faster or slower would look better
>>
>>3860984
0/10 absolute garbage
fix your monitor and stay away from curves idiot
>>
>>3861033
lol. Your reaction is completely over the top.
>>
>>3860453
>HDR
It looks like a single over exposed frame. The sky is completely blown out.
>>
>>3858919
>would you frame it?
>would you pay money for it?
>This is literally a "I just got my camera" tier photo.
not an argument, none of what you said would make the picture better.
>>
>>3860973
It's a bit blurry m8.
>>
File: DSC_3704.jpg (2.11 MB, 3000x2003)
2.11 MB
2.11 MB JPG
>>3860940
yep

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5300
Camera SoftwareVer.1.02
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern24246
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)16 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:03:11 11:21:56
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length11.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3861151
>not an argument, none of what you said would make the picture better.
I see why you would say that and I agree to some extent. but asking yourself if you would frame or pay for a shot is one of the best way to know quickly if its good.
Granted, it's not the only way. but it's a way.
>>
>>3861033
haha i didnt even have to touch the contrast to get that image.. try guessing again
>>
>>3859247
The window is more interesting than that bland building used to temporarily house homeless people and entertain teenagers that find it cool.

Should get closer next time. The graffiti and the contrast inside the room can still be seen.
>>
>>3860984
Went a little too hard on that contrast slide, huh?
>>
>>3861289
read
>>3861280
so no, i did something else xd
>>
File: PSX_20210411_191701.jpg (2.35 MB, 3000x1995)
2.35 MB
2.35 MB JPG
Is this a good photo? Yes/no and why?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3200
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.2.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2021:04:11 19:17:02
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
>>
>>3861040
Must be yet another poorfag
>>
>>3861434
nice collage lmfao
>>
>>3861451
It's not a collage believe it or not. I just edited out in photoshop some stairs and lamp posts.
>>
File: path.jpg (384 KB, 1000x562)
384 KB
384 KB JPG
>>3861449
tf?

>>3861434
what's your subject? The eyes kinda get lost looking at them

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:06:02 18:47:10
Exposure Time1/640 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length15.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5380
Image Height3026
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image ID8af1202989d90f000000000000000000
>>
>>3861454
The three trees are.
>>
>>3861456
*the eyes kinda get lost looking at the three trees
>>
>>3861457
I think it's a nice picture either way. It's reminiscent of that windows xp wallpaper.
>>
>>3861459
I'm not that anon but I wouldn't want my photos to be associated to a fucking windows wallpaper
>>
>>3861462
Understandable and you don't have to. But photography is intrisincally subjective and as suchwe perceive things in different ways. Since I like that windows xp wallpaper (that sold by 400 k mind you) it's a good picture to me.
>>
>>3861463
*such we
>>
File: DSC04264-1.jpg (486 KB, 1350x901)
486 KB
486 KB JPG
dick pick

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelDSC-RX100M2
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)89 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1350
Image Height901
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2021:04:11 15:35:09
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Brightness6.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length33.20 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3861280
Stop trying to be cute your photo is shit because of what you've done to it. You know what you did.

Adjusting levels/gamma/curves/contrast, doing multiply/burn/linear blends, fucking whatever. I guarantee nobody gives a shit. The end result is horrible and that's all that matters. Calibrate your monitor and stay away from sliders.
>>
>>3861623
What do you think about >>3861434?
>>
>>3861623
hahaha i literally did none of that.. the main effect was reached completely outside of post production...

wanted you to guess.. but ok:/

also i didnt say my photo is not shit!!
>>
>>3861642
Tolerable, but still too high on the contrast and a bit over saturated.
You can get this look SOOC so while inaccurate and rather unpleasant to look at it's not all too uncommon for photos like these to exist. It's the end result of trying to cram too much contrast into an SDR file. Normies playing with sliders do this all the time.
>>
File: akina.jpg (1.66 MB, 2000x1333)
1.66 MB
1.66 MB JPG
>>3858560
I am new. Had a sony a6000 for a while and got a tokina atx 90mm.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6000
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2021:04:04 18:30:52
Exposure Time1/20 sec
F-Numberf/0.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Brightness-5.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length0.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2000
Image Height1333
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: rust3.jpg (1.45 MB, 2000x1125)
1.45 MB
1.45 MB JPG
>>3861653
more I just took an hour ago

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:04:11 18:48:31
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Brightness0.7 EV
Exposure Bias0.3 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2000
Image Height1125
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: spinner.jpg (523 KB, 2000x1125)
523 KB
523 KB JPG
>>3861655
Figuring things out, no tripod or flash

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:04:11 18:39:18
Exposure Time1/500 sec
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Brightness-0.2 EV
Exposure Bias0.3 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2000
Image Height1125
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>3861650
I was intentionally going for high contrast and saturation. I was trying to make it seem like the Bliss Windows XP wallpaper.
It wasn't my first edit on that photograph but rather my second more playful one.
I shot in RAW and then edited in photoshop + LR.
And while it may be SDR I felt HDR didnt make sense given the circumstances
>>
>>3861657
Based boomer fishing
>>
>>3861453
What's with the black block on the left?
What's with the border near the part where the grass ends? Poorly masked or what?
>>
File: 1386813017692.jpg (162 KB, 500x1496)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
>>3861453
Also it's on par with this, it may not be a collage but it looks like one.
>>
File: moss.jpg (1.74 MB, 2000x1125)
1.74 MB
1.74 MB JPG
>>3861691
thanks nigga

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:04:11 20:08:34
Exposure Time1/640 sec
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Brightness-3/80 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width2000
Image Height1125
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: bliss and yours.jpg (303 KB, 1800x900)
303 KB
303 KB JPG
>>3861677
>I was intentionally going for high contrast and saturation. I was trying to make it seem like the Bliss Windows XP wallpaper.
Guess you failed then.
Look at Bliss side-by-side with your file.

Bliss isn't high contrast. It's well lit all around, the only real shadows are soft shadows from cloud cover. It's a natural looking image.
Regarding saturation it's simply drum scanned film, not artificially cranked saturation from a shitty Bayer CMOS sensor with interpolated color samples.

If you wanna capture Bliss style shots with nice colors you should look for a Foveon sensor to get decent color, get a tripod and scout for similar areas or as a general rule just aim for faithful rendering.
>>
File: PSX_20210412_104601.jpg (1.21 MB, 3000x1995)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
>>3861693
Most likely yes. I spent roughly an hour editing out a staircase and some lamp posts. I'll post the first more truthful edit of the photo in this comment.
>>3861695
That's unironically a nice collage.
>>3861717
I guess the vignette effect makes it look off when compared to the bliss wallpaper. Either way the grass on my photo has way much more detail compared with the soft bland grass on the left side.
For what it's worth I did use a tripod.
And while I don't understand much about the technical struggles of a Bayer CMOS sensor, I appreciate your input. Thanks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:04:12 10:46:01
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: unknown-29.png (2.18 MB, 1200x800)
2.18 MB
2.18 MB PNG
>>3862021
>Either way the grass on my photo has way much more detail compared with the soft bland grass on the left side.

That's good if you want your photos to be about the tuft of grass in the foreground of the photo...which I find completely uninteresting and kinda sloppy looking as a piece of the overall composition.

Rip this one up friends.
>>
>>3862065
How would I solve that problem though?
Also great picture, did you make the driver stop where he was?
>>
File: 20210412_153439.jpg (3.07 MB, 2764x2073)
3.07 MB
3.07 MB JPG
I'm horrible but I'm trying

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4608
Image Height3456
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Light SourceUnknown
>>
>>3862065
I love it so much wow
>>
>>3862096
Don't use a wide angle lens and put something like overgrown grass in the foreground. Wide angle lens + foreground object puts phasis on that foreground object.

And no I don't know who that driver was I just used as fast a shutter speed as I could to freeze him as he drove by.

>>3862112
Thanks
>>
>>3862021
The way you edited concrete floor out and enlarged the building or whatever effectively made it a collage. Also the staircase is better than having a black block. Cloning is a better way to go about it. A good manipulation looks like something from real life.
>>3862065
I like it, reminiscent of Gregory Crewdson's work.
>>
File: zako.jpg (488 KB, 1000x1000)
488 KB
488 KB JPG
>>3862065
pretty great
>>3862108
try focusing on a subject more.. the pattern didnt quite work

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.4.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:08:01 06:59:14
Exposure Time1/1250 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias1/3 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: jap-1.jpg (4.48 MB, 8256x6192)
4.48 MB
4.48 MB JPG
How's this?
>>
File: jap_27.jpg (1.58 MB, 8256x6192)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB JPG
>>3862285
And this
>>
File: jap_3-2 (1).jpg (4.44 MB, 6192x8256)
4.44 MB
4.44 MB JPG
>>3862287

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelGFX 50R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.2.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: jap_28.jpg (2.18 MB, 6192x8256)
2.18 MB
2.18 MB JPG
>>3862289
>>
File: jap_38.jpg (2.61 MB, 6192x8256)
2.61 MB
2.61 MB JPG
>>3862292
These are the ones I am most worried about.
>>
>>3862285

It's a mediocre picture of a tree idk what sort of criticism you really want from this.
>>
File: 20210412_135120.jpg (845 KB, 2048x1367)
845 KB
845 KB JPG
>>3862302
I've seen images like pic related on Twitter and i like them, how can I get there?
>>
>>3858596
So post something that is "interesting" then
>>
this is wonderful creation. i liked this pic so much that i felt like crying. idk why it might. maybe im just crazy :\\\\\\
>>
>>3862307
Just find 2 trees and point your camera up. I don't even find that to be a very good photo but it's not like there is any real lighting or composition that's being considered here
>>
File: 20210412_182507.jpg (486 KB, 2048x1366)
486 KB
486 KB JPG
>>3862443
That's what I did, here's another pic i like.
>>
>>3862486
Why are Fuji colors so awful?
>>
Trying out a new style
>>
>>3860280
What do you disagree with? My criticism is open to criticism.
>>
>>3862506
That's canon ...
>>
File: IMG_1778.jpg (1.71 MB, 6000x4000)
1.71 MB
1.71 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T7
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:12 22:21:41
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length250.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3862596
>That's canon ...
oh no no no.... fuji schizo on suicide watch.
>>
File: IMG_1781.jpg (822 KB, 6000x4000)
822 KB
822 KB JPG
>>3862732

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T7
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:12 22:34:07
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length220.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_1734.jpg (958 KB, 6000x4000)
958 KB
958 KB JPG
>>3862735

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T7
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:12 22:24:17
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating125
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length150.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3862284
This is the only good photo I’ve seen ITT.
>>
File: Fuji400h003.jpg (3.68 MB, 8895x5567)
3.68 MB
3.68 MB JPG
These are 3 images from a walk I had in downtown San Antonio

>>3862732
>>3862735
These are nice to look at but not much of story going on
>>3862737
This one is weak because its something we see every day
.>>3862589
Pretty good
>>3862284
Sharp crispy and yummy image, what did you shoot this on?
>>3862108
Don't beat yourself up. I would suggest more focus in your subject. It seems like you captured an entire area that you could have explored and took more time with smaller parts of the cemetery.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:13 01:28:18
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: Fuji400Building.jpg (4.22 MB, 5567x8853)
4.22 MB
4.22 MB JPG
>>3862762
#2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:13 01:27:39
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: Fuji400h004.jpg (3.64 MB, 5504x8810)
3.64 MB
3.64 MB JPG
>>3862763
#3

I took more than these whilst I was out and about but these 3 I feel are the strongest that I had shot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:13 01:28:35
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: DSC00600.jpg (1.29 MB, 3000x2000)
1.29 MB
1.29 MB JPG
>>
File: DSC00688.jpg (2.32 MB, 4742x3237)
2.32 MB
2.32 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareILCE-6000 v3.21
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)225 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Height4000
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2021:01:17 12:09:39
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Image Width6000
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramManual
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Height4000
Brightness9.6 EV
White BalanceAuto
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Exposure Time1/400 sec
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/5.6
SaturationNormal
Image Width6000
ISO Speed Rating100
SharpnessNormal
ContrastNormal
Focal Length150.00 mm
Metering ModePattern
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Light SourceUnknown
>>
>>3861653
Kinda looks like tilt-shift, the AK looks like a miniature model; good choice of background the rug has a lot of detail. I do feel like the focus should be a little further into the scene, but this is still great
>>
File: zako2.jpg (342 KB, 1000x800)
342 KB
342 KB JPG
>>3862750
Thanks
>>3862762
>what did you shoot this on
you mean the lens? my trusty old 40mm canon pancake lens.. very practical on hikes

>>3862763
the shot could be cleaner, but I like it
>>3862793
she didnt appreciate getting flashed
>>3862794
so crisp

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.4.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2020:08:01 06:59:30
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating160
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias1/3 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length40.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3862065
My favorite and I cant stress that enough. That building looks familiar. Where is this?
>>
>>3862238
>>3862284
>>3863318
Thanks friends. That shot was taken in Nova Scotia.
>>
File: 001.jpg (687 KB, 1000x667)
687 KB
687 KB JPG
Just got my first camera, tell me what I'm getting wrong.
1/4
>>
File: 002.jpg (402 KB, 1000x667)
402 KB
402 KB JPG
>>3863339
2/4
>>
File: 003.jpg (249 KB, 1000x667)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>3863342
3/4
>>
File: 004.jpg (274 KB, 1000x667)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
>>3863343
4/4
I took a bunch more but these were the only 4 I liked.
>>
>>3860710
At least we got an interesting post out of this thread.
>>
>>3863398
Wrong
>>
File: 1591306395468.jpg (1.4 MB, 1500x1000)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB JPG
>>3862668
>>3862670
>>3862672
>>3862676
Anything is appreciated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 60D
Camera SoftwareLuminar AI
Lens Size18.00 - 270.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.0
Serial Number-191365845
Lens Name18-270mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:04:17 09:44:24
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating500
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Exposure Bias-1/3 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length76.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5184
Image Height3456
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Exposure ModeTv-Priority
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeCenter-Weighted
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceManual Temperature
Exposure Compensation2
Sensor ISO Speed236
Color Matrix131
Color Temperature4800 K
>>
>>3863709
View OP at 300 nits, then view the "fixed"
OP >>3858560
"Fixed" >>3860442

OP is way better. The bulbs actually look like dimly lit bulbs, and the branch has natural tones and the overall scene looks lifelike. The "Fixed" version just looks like fake contrast trash with wonky colors and most things are overexposed.

When you view at 120nits the OP looks dim but that's irrelevant. People are gonna be viewing shit on 500nit+ smartphones with high native contrast so you want those original tones and details to scale, not be clamped by clipping and faked contrast.
>>
File: FB_IMG_1611585700660.jpg (131 KB, 1080x720)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
What do You think?
>>
>>3865319
131 kb. Could be that, or it could be your lens. Hard to say. Scene is nice, framing is nice, white sky isn't disturbing too much, but the quality is honestly weird.
>>
I don't want to destroy images, so here's a link --> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-lNhMdPwzljBA38Aut37vmdQfzniSwOt?usp=sharing

Looks a bit staged but it's not. The only thing I cannot decide is what is the proper amount of grain to add.
>>
>>3865319
Absolute trash.
Looks redeemable if you shot RAW, but, with that post-processing it's a complete no from me as-is.
>>
>>3865857
>>3865859
thoughts?
>>
>>3859951
like the colors, could do with a better angle (i.e. parallel with the facade)
also you need to distinguish between brutalism and commie mass housing. brutalism is an architectural style with actual thought and intention not just mindless use of concrete (see barbican estate and la tourette monastery)
>>
>>3866553
Forgettable, I'm afraid. Dirty window is really disturbing on the first one, and the flower one has too many shades.
>>
File: 000037100023.jpg (4.92 MB, 2019x3046)
4.92 MB
4.92 MB JPG
beginner photographer, need help with how to compose better photos. Any advice?
>>
>>3866752
start painting
>>
File: beasmarty.jpg (1.11 MB, 2448x3264)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB JPG
Would an aukey ora improve this?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModeliPhone 5s
Camera Software12.4.9
Equipment MakeApple
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Image Width2448
Image Height3264
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2021:04:20 02:21:02
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Exposure Bias0 EV
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Height2448
Brightness2.0 EV
White BalanceAuto
Exposure ModeAuto
Exposure Time1/30 sec
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
F-Numberf/2.2
ISO Speed Rating100
Image Width3264
Focal Length4.15 mm
Metering ModeSpot
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3866752
as a fellow beginner one of the best pieces of advice that i've seen from this board and other photographers is subject. im not really sure what exactly im supposed to be looking at here. my eyes wander all over and im looking for, for lack of a better term, the main character of the photo.
>>
I can’t get the trees and sky to look good in this. I don’t know what I’m doing wrong.
>>
>>3867806
You're shooting in shitty light. Photography's medium is light. Use better light.
>>
File: 20210418_185635.jpg (1.45 MB, 4128x3096)
1.45 MB
1.45 MB JPG
>>3858560

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-A215U
Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2021:04:19 11:21:32
Exposure Time0 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
ISO Speed Rating115
Lens Aperturef/1.9
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.05 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
White BalanceAuto
>>
>>3867844
Am I just fucked when it isn’t sunny? Weather here hasn’t been great, and I’m usually wagecucking during the best hours of the day.
>>
>>3863339
>>3863342
>>3863343
>>3863344

Hate to beg but would appreciate some feedback here as I’m starting off
>>
File: 20210419230649_IMG_7719.jpg (790 KB, 1920x1280)
790 KB
790 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.2.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2021:04:19 23:06:49
FlashNo Flash
>>
>>3863342
This is the best one, i like it, it had ..direction...
>>3863339
>>3863343
These two are boring, no interesting subject
>>3863344
I like this one for the shadow but I'm autistic
>>
>>3867847
this is a great location, even though I have seen it already in so many pictures.
imho, there's nothing really interesting going on here, and there is not a clear subject, and also I would have waited until sunset
>>
>>3867844
this

>>3867858
try to find different angles on that barn, maybe try putting the little house on the left on the foreground. But yeah, light is super plain here, try sunrise, sunset, or overcast/cloudy
>>
File: photo.jpg (3.87 MB, 5008x3339)
3.87 MB
3.87 MB JPG
>>3867971
Subject not in focus.

>>3863344
I think it's a little vanilla, there's no subject or anything going on

>>3863241
Looks great, I think bw makes this. Maybe up the contrast a touch?

>>3867806
This shot would be better at sunset or sunrise for better light. However the subject is kinda plain imo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6300
Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:24 20:02:20
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/1.4
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating6400
Lens Aperturef/1.4
Brightness-6.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length30.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: 1.jpg (1.52 MB, 6000x4000)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB JPG
really new to this but i an old man that i stumbled upon. we did not speak the same language but he was more than delighted to just interact and talk to me even though we had no idea what either of us were saying.
i did some editing on this in lightroom to lower the exposure. i feel like it could still use some more work though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T7
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:04:25 12:00:07
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramLandscape Mode
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length35.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
A bump
>>
I can't get an image to be small enough for 4chan to save my fucking life
>>
File: Racoon_In_Tree4.png (4.42 MB, 1261x840)
4.42 MB
4.42 MB PNG
Actual first photo & attempt at image software
>>
>>3872225
The sticky literally tells you how small to make it
>>
File: IMG_20210411_123839.jpg (3.73 MB, 4224x5632)
3.73 MB
3.73 MB JPG
thoughts?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHUAWEI
Camera ModelMAR-LX1M
Camera SoftwareMAR-L01MEA 10.0.0.420(C316E8R1P3)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4224
Image Height5632
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Image OrientationUnknown
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2021:04:11 12:38:44
Exposure Time409/500000 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating50
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceDaylight
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length3.62 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4224
Image Height5632
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
>>3872230
Very non-distracting. You have a perfect viewpoint here. There's almost nothing in the foreground to steal attention, and the background is pretty continuously green. 7/10, I couldn't personally do better.

>>3872490
It looks best as a thumbnail, but it looks really good as a thumbnail. I'm not sure if urban haze just makes things look not sharp, but once the image is open everything is a bit fuzzy. The off-kilter composition is really strong though. Did you use a CPL filter? I think some of the buildings would look nicer with some reflections filtered out. Obviously you can't get em all but they're a smidge distracting. 6/10
>>
>>3872498
>my 'coon got 7/10
I appreciate the kind critique anon. Wasnt sure how the color adjustment looked to those with more experience. The shot was a very easy one. This raccoon yeeted another out of the tree and claimed that spot
>>
>>3872230
shadows too dark, hilights too oversaturated, no midtones
>>
>>3872667
Thanks anon
What's a midtone though?
>>
>>3872729
Just the values in the middle of the brightness scale. You're pushing everything to the extremes, making it hard to see what's going on. Ease up in post, especially when you're learning
>>
File: PicsArt_04-26-03.34.21.jpg (1.27 MB, 2743x3518)
1.27 MB
1.27 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer231224785035102
Camera ModelSM-G960U
Camera SoftwarePicsArt
Equipment Makesamsung
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution72
Horizontal Resolution72
Image Width2743
Image Height3518
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2021:04:26 15:34:21
Lens Aperturef/2.4
White BalanceAuto
Focal Length4.30 mm
Exposure Time1/5000 sec
ISO Speed Rating50
FlashNo Flash
F-Numberf/2.4
>>
>>3872757
Thanks. I'll admit darker/ heavier shadows looks appeal to me more, so I'd likely go too hard on it if not pointed out
>>
>>3872498
Thanks anon it probably blurry because i took it with my phone (Huawei P30 lite), i dont have any professional equipment because i just can't invest in photography but i sure do enjoy taking pictures.

not sure who >>>3872498 is though lmao
>>
File: DSCF2291.jpg (3.89 MB, 6240x4160)
3.89 MB
3.89 MB JPG
First time posting, second attempt at not messing up the compression.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX100V
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:03:30 21:13:16
Exposure Time1/1100 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating320
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness9.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length23.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: Deer.jpg (2.67 MB, 3200x4000)
2.67 MB
2.67 MB JPG
cheap Canon 750D, Cheap 18-135 Lens, Favourite picture I've taken in years

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 750D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Imagecore (Linux)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created2021:05:03 09:43:24
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length135.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3874936
I like where you're going for but the colors seem a little excessive.
>>
>>3876394
>colors seem a little excessive
It even looks desaturated from here, why are homosexuals ironically so bent against colours?
>>
>>3876397
I meant the colors that are turning the sky cyan and the grass yellow. It's a signature mark of Classic Chrome but I feel like it's been increased.
>>
>>3876393
This is nice. Could do with a little sharpening though
>>
File: IMG_0058-4chan.jpg (4.64 MB, 5900x3933)
4.64 MB
4.64 MB JPG
Took this yesterday. I like parts of it, others i'm not so sure about. Feels off balance to me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 22.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5900
Image Height3933
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2021:05:03 19:05:50
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length70.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5900
Image Height3933
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3858560
comfy af
>>
>>
>>3876737
>>
>>3876739
>>
File: 1620065249973.jpg (3.61 MB, 5900x3933)
3.61 MB
3.61 MB JPG
>>3876420

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 6D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021:05:03 20:13:16
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length70.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
In Atlanta
>>
File: fuckoff.png (4 KB, 160x49)
4 KB
4 KB PNG
>>3876763
>>
I can't lower the res more then 1mb on lightroom mobile so I screenshot
>>
>>
>>3876763
nice nip
>>
>>3876763
Horrible noise at the lower part of the image but i guess a photo is better than nophoto.
The subjects and their idea are dumb enough but the lighting and the colors portrayed are very good.
>>
>>3876799
I appreciate it. Yeah the noise is pretty rough. I blasted them with a hss flash to get some punchy pop.
>>
What You think?

And also how can i add exif data?
>>
>>3877076
nice cross-stitch bro
>>
File: DSC_3241.jpg (971 KB, 1635x920)
971 KB
971 KB JPG
Do you think this has any kind of interest ? I will post critiques later.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D600
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern846
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:05:04 22:41:56
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Exposure Bias1/3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastSoft
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: 000031820008-2.jpg (305 KB, 2048x1472)
305 KB
305 KB JPG
shot on fuji gw690ii and velvia 100 slide film

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2021:05:04 17:57:13
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>3876739
Eye contact from the kid triggers me but that's just me. I like street shots more when they're oblivious and just focused on whatever action is at hand.
I do really like what you did with the light, colors, and tones. The shadows make the man's face really expressive.
I think a slightly tighter crop centered on the subjects would have balanced the composition more. The background and secondary subjects take up more space than they deserve, especially up top. I'd even like to see the same shot but with longer focal length, farther away, and with shallower depth.
>>
>>3877412
>Longer focal length??

28mm through 50mm are the only proper lengths for street, anything else and you're just a pervert.





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.