Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.
Just post pics and talk about them[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)112 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:04:08 03:24:37Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Brightness4.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length75.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3858560No compositionUnder exposedNo subjectJust a bunch of lights hanging from a scaffolding in ManhattanLooks like the first picture I'd take as an early beginnerMy point is you probably saw something with your eyes but couldn't translate it to a photography.
>>3858588Well I was just snapping pics on the way to work, didn't have all day to stand there framing it up so I just set focus on the front bulb and set the exposure until it looked ok. Also I lowered the brightness in GIMP because I thought it looked a bit more moody.
>>3858594What I mean is it's just a bunch of lightsThere's nothing to get out of this picture.
>>3858588Here's another shot, I like the way the pillars are staggered here, and the text on the foremost is nice[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)91 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:04:08 04:38:35Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Brightness2.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length61.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height6000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3858596Well I was seeing how much bokeh I could get from my cheapo superzoom, not everything has to be a masterpiece
>>3858596Also here's a closeup, I think this looks a lot better[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)202 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:04:08 05:03:16Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Brightness3.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length135.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3858560I think it's alright>>3858588>Under exposedIt's dark sometimes during the day, you know.You don't have to overpull all shadows.
>>3858594>GIMP'd the brightnessCould you post the unedited one?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX100FCamera SoftwareDigital Camera X100F Ver2.11Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:07 07:34:12Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.7Brightness4.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1776Image Height1184RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessSoftWhite BalanceDaylightChroma SaturationUnknownFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeProgram AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>>3858766I like the little patch of flowers in the tree, also its kindof weird how they have the grass trimmed in the front, there's sidewalk squares in the grass>>3858758Honestly, I'm looking at the unedited one and there's no real appreciable difference, I might be slightly retarded but I literally remember turning the brightness down[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution56 dpcmVertical Resolution56 dpcmImage Created2021:04:08 10:11:48Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3858832Oh the change is mostly under the canopy, some of the beams are less visible
>>3858560OP, why did you make a critique thread if all you’re going to do is argue with people?
>>3858832Hmmm is your pic anamorphic?
>>3858588>No composition>Under exposed>No subjectnone of that shit matters, I like it
>>3858832Yea there really isn't a whole lot of difference there.
>>3858843I don't know man I just wanted to make a thread and post some pics, and see some that other people took. Just now got a decent camera for video work and I'm starting to get into photography, so I thought I'd just chit chat with some people here
>>3858588All subjective. Post objective criticism of it or stfu. I like OPs pic
Here's one from outside Grand Central station[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.22Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)202 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:04:08 04:44:09Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Brightness0.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length135.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3858848>>3858907would you frame it? would you pay money for it? This is literally a "I just got my camera" tier photo.>>3858907>All subjective. Post objective criticism of it or stfu.all art is subjective wtf do you mean? can you tell us why you like it? at least the other anon said why he didn't.>>3858594>Well I was just snapping pics on the way to work, didn't have all day to stand there framing it up so I just set focus on the front bulb and set the exposure until it looked ok.see. this is why it's not a good photo. you reap what you sow. you took the photo hastily and got the results that comes with doing a snapshot. next time you're out ask yourself why you're taking a shot. wonder what you're trying to say. ask yourself what could make the shot better. If you're just snapping for the sake of snapping because you want to justify being out with your camera, you're not doing it right. When you bring the viewfinder to your eye, you should already have the shot all framed up in your mind.tl;dr Shoot with purpose.
>>3858603>Well I was seeing how much bokeh I could get from my cheapo superzoom, not everything has to be a masterpiecewhy are you asking for criticism on a test shot? why do you have to be so defensive? >>3858843this.
>>3858919I like the contrast between the flowers and the lights. Objective criticism are things like "this is not in focus". "this could be sharper". The photo has a subject and composition, you just don't like it. Photographers have their heads so far up their asses jesus christ
>>3858935i dont even... you really should grow some thicker skin, friend. it's objectively shit
>>3858621Yes, it is better because there is an apparent motif. I understand here at least what the photographer saw. But still, the result is boring, too simple. Yes, it is better because there is an apparent motif. I understand here at least what the photographer saw. But still, the result is boring, too simple. But I myself have no idea how to photograph this excitingly or show something exciting about it. Maybe a reflection in the glass, but that's already gymnastics, because it creates rather a substitute motif.
>>3858941>dumbass on /p/ can't fathom that art is subjective and that something they might hate looks great to others (and it's not a matter of having a "skilled" eye)never change /p/
i took this the other day, i quite like it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6D Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.2 (Macintosh)PhotographerVictor BuusMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:04:05 20:06:44Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating12800Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3675Image Height3675RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3859247The window looks perfectly broken, almost out of a comic book, I also like the beam of light showing the debris on the floor
>>3858904So you didn’t want a critique thread at all, but a jerk-off session
>>3859783you cant be serious, every thread here is a jerkoff session
Rate it from 0 to generic brutalist building shot[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G5 X Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2020:11:16 15:55:55Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length21.27 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3859951>generic brutalist buildingThis meme needs to die, retarded normal cattle can't distinguish a victorian house from a post-modernist museum.
Lmao
>>3859951That's not even brutalism
it's an almost textbook example of a brutalist buidling, one of the many built by the communists in my country after the war. It isn't one of the fancy ones, or the interesting ones, but its definitely brutalist. > Brutalist buildings are characterised by minimalist constructions that showcase the bare building materials and structural elements over decorative design.[4][5] The style commonly makes use of exposed concrete or brick, angular geometric shapes and a predominantly monochrome colour palette;Check, check and check.
>>3860014>it's an almost textbook example of a brutalist buidlingIt's apparent concrete "apparent"?>NoBuilt by the communists but is that a factor into making it brutalist?>Actually noIt isn't one of the fancy ones, or the interesting ones, so is its mundane nature part of the brutalism?>NoThen it isn't you stupid donkey humper.>Brutalist buildings are characterised by minimalist constructionsFalse, see works of their founders: Marcel Breuer, Charles Jeanneret, Paul Rudolph>showcase the bare building materials and structural elements over decorative designTrue, the structural work is in part the decorative design based on bewilderment>makes use of exposed concrete or brick, angular geometric shapes and a predominantly monochromePartially false, it is usually concrete only but usually textured, can or cannot be monochrome, it depends.>Check, check and check.Your picture does not check them because it breaks with the rules. You are an illiterate gorilla nigger, fuck your school and its playground.
>>3860017 Lol no. Just because the most famous examples stand out from the norm (that's why they are famous) doesn't mean that they are the norm. Barebone, blocky, concrete, monotone, tall buildings are a staple for any city that was into brutalist architecture.
>>3858910Just the right amount of exposure for a nighttime (+rainy?) shot, and I like that the line of lights actually leads somewhere (the East 42nd Street sign). I wish the lights formed a tighter line – the large gap between the first and second light makes them seem disjointed. Maybe a different focal length at a different angle would make the lights look more like a single, cohesive line. Another complaint is that the biggest and most prominent light is out of focus, so it makes it feel even more disconnected from the other lights.Good shot but I think it could be even better.
>>3860024>Just because the most famous examples stand out from the normThe famous examples, all hundreds of them, do not stand out, they ARE the norm, hence why they set their style aside from the usual international modernism.>Barebone, blocky, concrete, monotoneConcrete and barebones are the only attributes from brutalism, what you are referencing is the International Style cheaply done.
>>3859951I give it a solid 8, there's a lot of variation throughout which makes it more interesting than the usual burnout building shot. I like the angle and the sporadic placement of the air conditioners
>>3860027Well I wanted to capture the linear decrease in gap between the lights from that point of view, I think maybe if I got closer to the wall It would improve the look. Next time I'm out there I'll take another shot and compare
>>3858603>>3858947hi im two days late to this thread but i wanna point out the level of retardation here
>>3860027Lmao what the fuck are you people talking about You’re all nutjobs
>>3858560post raw?
>>3858560It's underexposedHere's my edit[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 21.1 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)112 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height2667Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:04:10 17:30:07Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.6Brightness4.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length75.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4000Image Height2667RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
I was hikking a few days ago and this place looked nice to try a HDR photo.Rate please.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D5300Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 4.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern824Focal Length (35mm Equiv)16 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:10 12:37:40Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length11.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3860453looks just like google street view congrats !
>>3860442Now that's just over exposed.I'll let you in on a little secret any photo that looks like it's properly exposed is over exposed and most that look under exposed are objectively more accurate and faithful.Shitty LCDs don't match real world contrast so copelets use curves and other memes to simulate it at the cost of compressing highlights and shit. Like your edit. It looks washed out now and garbage.Increase the brighrness of your monitor not the image. That's where people fuck up so badly in photos. They want overpowering brightness in details on a dim screen and wind up butchering the actual image to simulate that.
>>3860442lmao you made it way worse, the exposure was fine before
>>3860453awfulpost RAW?
>>3860483>>3860725kek thanks for your honesty first time using a wide angle lens so yeah.. I don't know how to manage it yet I shooted RAW using bracketing exposure and then I stacked the 3 photos in 1
>>3858600Framing is all off, there is no empty space on the left side for the columns to lead to, it sort of just abruptly hits the edge of the frame, also the text is a good contrast to the pillars but takes up a bit too much space and in a weird position in the overall photo
>>3858919>would you frame it?>would you pay money for it?>This is literally a "I just got my camera" tier photo.Be honest, even the best photographer couldn't make something worthy of framing with that scene. Maybe some super macro but you need a lens for that.
>>3860857can you post a single exposure without HDR memes?I'm sure the scene would look good with a properly processed RAW from a single good exposure.
CRIT PLS[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeBlackBerryCamera ModelBlackBerry ClassicCamera SoftwareBlackBerry 10.3.3.3216Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiExposure Time399/1000000 secF-Numberf/2.2ISO Speed Rating103Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3264Image Height2448White BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3860453the stair leads the eyes good enough I suppose, but there's really not much of an interest/subject>>3860973y[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.20Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:10:17 18:17:51Exposure Time1 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3860453crooked looks terrible here, also perfectly wrong shutter speed for the waterfall, either faster or slower would look better
>>38609840/10 absolute garbagefix your monitor and stay away from curves idiot
>>3861033lol. Your reaction is completely over the top.
>>3860453>HDRIt looks like a single over exposed frame. The sky is completely blown out.
>>3858919>would you frame it?>would you pay money for it?>This is literally a "I just got my camera" tier photo.not an argument, none of what you said would make the picture better.
>>3860973It's a bit blurry m8.
>>3860940yep[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D5300Camera SoftwareVer.1.02Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern24246Focal Length (35mm Equiv)16 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:03:11 11:21:56Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length11.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3861151>not an argument, none of what you said would make the picture better.I see why you would say that and I agree to some extent. but asking yourself if you would frame or pay for a shot is one of the best way to know quickly if its good. Granted, it's not the only way. but it's a way.
>>3861033haha i didnt even have to touch the contrast to get that image.. try guessing again
>>3859247The window is more interesting than that bland building used to temporarily house homeless people and entertain teenagers that find it cool.Should get closer next time. The graffiti and the contrast inside the room can still be seen.
>>3860984Went a little too hard on that contrast slide, huh?
>>3861289read>>3861280so no, i did something else xd
Is this a good photo? Yes/no and why?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3200Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.2.0 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2021:04:11 19:17:02Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mm
>>3861040Must be yet another poorfag
>>3861434nice collage lmfao
>>3861451It's not a collage believe it or not. I just edited out in photoshop some stairs and lamp posts.
>>3861449tf?>>3861434what's your subject? The eyes kinda get lost looking at them[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:06:02 18:47:10Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length15.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width5380Image Height3026RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image ID8af1202989d90f000000000000000000
>>3861454The three trees are.
>>3861456*the eyes kinda get lost looking at the three trees
>>3861457I think it's a nice picture either way. It's reminiscent of that windows xp wallpaper.
>>3861459I'm not that anon but I wouldn't want my photos to be associated to a fucking windows wallpaper
>>3861462Understandable and you don't have to. But photography is intrisincally subjective and as suchwe perceive things in different ways. Since I like that windows xp wallpaper (that sold by 400 k mind you) it's a good picture to me.
>>3861463*such we
dick pick[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-RX100M2Camera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)89 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1350Image Height901Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2021:04:11 15:35:09Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Brightness6.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length33.20 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3861280Stop trying to be cute your photo is shit because of what you've done to it. You know what you did.Adjusting levels/gamma/curves/contrast, doing multiply/burn/linear blends, fucking whatever. I guarantee nobody gives a shit. The end result is horrible and that's all that matters. Calibrate your monitor and stay away from sliders.
>>3861623What do you think about >>3861434?
>>3861623hahaha i literally did none of that.. the main effect was reached completely outside of post production...wanted you to guess.. but ok:/also i didnt say my photo is not shit!!
>>3861642Tolerable, but still too high on the contrast and a bit over saturated.You can get this look SOOC so while inaccurate and rather unpleasant to look at it's not all too uncommon for photos like these to exist. It's the end result of trying to cram too much contrast into an SDR file. Normies playing with sliders do this all the time.
>>3858560I am new. Had a sony a6000 for a while and got a tokina atx 90mm.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width6000Image Height4000Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2021:04:04 18:30:52Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Brightness-5.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height1333RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3861653more I just took an hour ago[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:04:11 18:48:31Exposure Time1/1000 secExposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating400Brightness0.7 EVExposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height1125RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3861655Figuring things out, no tripod or flash[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:04:11 18:39:18Exposure Time1/500 secExposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating400Brightness-0.2 EVExposure Bias0.3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height1125RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3861650I was intentionally going for high contrast and saturation. I was trying to make it seem like the Bliss Windows XP wallpaper.It wasn't my first edit on that photograph but rather my second more playful one.I shot in RAW and then edited in photoshop + LR.And while it may be SDR I felt HDR didnt make sense given the circumstances
>>3861657Based boomer fishing
>>3861453What's with the black block on the left?What's with the border near the part where the grass ends? Poorly masked or what?
>>3861453Also it's on par with this, it may not be a collage but it looks like one.
>>3861691thanks nigga[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2021:04:11 20:08:34Exposure Time1/640 secExposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating400Brightness-3/80 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height1125RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3861677>I was intentionally going for high contrast and saturation. I was trying to make it seem like the Bliss Windows XP wallpaper.Guess you failed then.Look at Bliss side-by-side with your file.Bliss isn't high contrast. It's well lit all around, the only real shadows are soft shadows from cloud cover. It's a natural looking image.Regarding saturation it's simply drum scanned film, not artificially cranked saturation from a shitty Bayer CMOS sensor with interpolated color samples.If you wanna capture Bliss style shots with nice colors you should look for a Foveon sensor to get decent color, get a tripod and scout for similar areas or as a general rule just aim for faithful rendering.
>>3861693Most likely yes. I spent roughly an hour editing out a staircase and some lamp posts. I'll post the first more truthful edit of the photo in this comment.>>3861695That's unironically a nice collage.>>3861717I guess the vignette effect makes it look off when compared to the bliss wallpaper. Either way the grass on my photo has way much more detail compared with the soft bland grass on the left side.For what it's worth I did use a tripod.And while I don't understand much about the technical struggles of a Bayer CMOS sensor, I appreciate your input. Thanks.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:04:12 10:46:01Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3862021>Either way the grass on my photo has way much more detail compared with the soft bland grass on the left side.That's good if you want your photos to be about the tuft of grass in the foreground of the photo...which I find completely uninteresting and kinda sloppy looking as a piece of the overall composition.Rip this one up friends.
>>3862065How would I solve that problem though?Also great picture, did you make the driver stop where he was?
I'm horrible but I'm trying[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width4608Image Height3456Image OrientationTop, Left-HandLight SourceUnknown
>>3862065I love it so much wow
>>3862096Don't use a wide angle lens and put something like overgrown grass in the foreground. Wide angle lens + foreground object puts phasis on that foreground object.And no I don't know who that driver was I just used as fast a shutter speed as I could to freeze him as he drove by.>>3862112Thanks
>>3862021The way you edited concrete floor out and enlarged the building or whatever effectively made it a collage. Also the staircase is better than having a black block. Cloning is a better way to go about it. A good manipulation looks like something from real life. >>3862065I like it, reminiscent of Gregory Crewdson's work.
>>3862065pretty great>>3862108try focusing on a subject more.. the pattern didnt quite work[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.4.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:08:01 06:59:14Exposure Time1/1250 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias1/3 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
How's this?
>>3862285And this
>>3862287[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelGFX 50RCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 6.2.0 (Android)Image-Specific Properties:
>>3862289
>>3862292These are the ones I am most worried about.
>>3862285It's a mediocre picture of a tree idk what sort of criticism you really want from this.
>>3862302I've seen images like pic related on Twitter and i like them, how can I get there?
>>3858596So post something that is "interesting" then
this is wonderful creation. i liked this pic so much that i felt like crying. idk why it might. maybe im just crazy :\\\\\\
>>3862307Just find 2 trees and point your camera up. I don't even find that to be a very good photo but it's not like there is any real lighting or composition that's being considered here
>>3862443That's what I did, here's another pic i like.
>>3862486Why are Fuji colors so awful?
Trying out a new style
>>3860280What do you disagree with? My criticism is open to criticism.
>>3862506That's canon ...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.4Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:12 22:21:41Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating250Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length250.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3862596>That's canon ...oh no no no.... fuji schizo on suicide watch.
>>3862732[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:12 22:34:07Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length220.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3862735[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS Rebel T7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:12 22:24:17Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating125Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length150.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3862284This is the only good photo I’ve seen ITT.
These are 3 images from a walk I had in downtown San Antonio>>3862732>>3862735These are nice to look at but not much of story going on>>3862737This one is weak because its something we see every day.>>3862589Pretty good>>3862284Sharp crispy and yummy image, what did you shoot this on?>>3862108Don't beat yourself up. I would suggest more focus in your subject. It seems like you captured an entire area that you could have explored and took more time with smaller parts of the cemetery.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:13 01:28:18Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3862762#2[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:13 01:27:39Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3862763#3I took more than these whilst I was out and about but these 3 I feel are the strongest that I had shot.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.2 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:04:13 01:28:35Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6000Camera SoftwareILCE-6000 v3.21Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)225 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Height4000Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2021:01:17 12:09:39Vertical Resolution350 dpiHorizontal Resolution350 dpiImage Width6000Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramManualColor Space InformationsRGBImage Height4000Brightness9.6 EVWhite BalanceAutoRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualExposure Time1/400 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/5.6SaturationNormalImage Width6000ISO Speed Rating100SharpnessNormalContrastNormalFocal Length150.00 mmMetering ModePatternScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>3861653Kinda looks like tilt-shift, the AK looks like a miniature model; good choice of background the rug has a lot of detail. I do feel like the focus should be a little further into the scene, but this is still great
>>3862750Thanks>>3862762>what did you shoot this onyou mean the lens? my trusty old 40mm canon pancake lens.. very practical on hikes>>3862763the shot could be cleaner, but I like it>>3862793she didnt appreciate getting flashed>>3862794so crisp[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 6DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.4.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2020:08:01 06:59:30Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias1/3 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3862065My favorite and I cant stress that enough. That building looks familiar. Where is this?
>>3862238>>3862284>>3863318Thanks friends. That shot was taken in Nova Scotia.
Just got my first camera, tell me what I'm getting wrong. 1/4
>>38633392/4
>>38633423/4
>>38633434/4 I took a bunch more but these were the only 4 I liked.
>>3860710At least we got an interesting post out of this thread.