/gear/ threadcompact large sensor cameras editionwhich MILC should i pic? sony or canon? or should i say fuckit and just go pentax k1?
>>3849114yea it is, its only 40 posts away or so
That pana looks very nice, get the Leica version for a cleaner look.
>>3849106Pentax isn't milc.
>>3849122i know, thats why im saying fuckit and returning to dslr
GF and I have been enjoying my new camera + nifty fifty, I want to get her something she can carry around in her purse. What elevated point-and-shoot can be had for <$300 used that is worth while? Preference goes to fast prime over zoom, doesn't have to be 50mm equivalent
>>3849132You could get an MFT camera with a 20mm f1.7 or 25mm f1.7 for about 250 USD.Think EM10 mark 1 or mark 2
>>3849106>which MILC should i pic? sony or canon?Sony has more native glass. Canon has a far better UI, the RF lenses they do have knock it out of the park, and their EF lenses are essentially native except for needing a metal tube for the right registration distance. (RF protocol is a superset of EF protocol, and EF glass works as well as it does on DSLRs.)Personally I would go Canon. But I have to admit that there are some tempting combos in Sony land, such as the A73 with one of their new compact primes.
>>3849115I got warned for that post with the reasons "troll posts", that's troll moderation if you ask me.I guess they're okay with people flooding the board with /gear/ threads.
>>3849106>compact large sensor>milcif FF, then A7C if you're fine with it, at least there are "pancake" lenses from samyang and sony
>>3849428Nah i dont like compromise cameras
Is the Sony RX100 III for $300 new in box still good in 2021 if I only have an iphone 8? It would be for general street snapshots, pictures of food, pictures of my cat, and candids of friends and family.
>>3850093It has a huge sensor so yeah
>>3850093just use your phone
>>3850177i dont wanna!!!!
>>3850306Wasn’t me, but also, I don’t wanna
Using phone ain't easy
Had an lx100. Might grab one again. Kino camera for learning on with the multi aspect sensor and the switch on the lens. A real pleasure to use. Not the highest res and viewfinder was meh. Solid 8/10
Has any company tried to clone the Leica 1A? I only see clones of the Barnack coupled with a rangefinder
if they make a Canon Powershot G5 X Mark III that has DPAF and keeps the fast lens i'm preordering it. how retarded am i anons?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width865Image Height507
>>3849637All cameras that aren't flagships are compromise cameras. Even flagships are compromise cameras often.
>>3851276>how retarded am i anons?Completely. The G1X III exists with an APS-C sensor. It's THE compact camera to have.
>>3851303but the g1x III has the slower lens, worse zoom, costs more, is heavier, is bigger, worse battery, older image processor (lower ISO, worse IS, 1/3 the continuous shooting fps)on the other hand the g1x III is weather sealed, has the bigger sensor and has DPAF.do you not care about the lense?>g5x II 24-120 / f1.8-2.8>g1x III 24-72 / f2.8-5.6it's so much better. DPAF and weather sealing are the real motivators for me getting the g1x over the sensor
If I actually, unironically, wanted to run minecraft on my Canon camera, how hard would it be to beat the wither?
>>3851316Faster is relative to the sensor size.In equivalent terms, the g5x2's lens is more like f/4.9-7.6 and the g1x3's is more like f/4.4-8.96In terms of noise, a picture on the g5x2 should have about as much noise as one taken with 3 times the ISO on the g1x3.>>3851326Neat, is that CHDK?I've only tried Arkanoid on ML.
>>3849106Get a Fuji. They have the most bang for your buck and the best balance between funcionality, looks and performance. We truly are blessed to live in a world where Fuji cameras exist.
>>3851354that's good to know thanks. i went from really wanting the g5xII to kinda wanting the g1xIII and now i don't know what i want. either way i'm going to wait for a sale so maybe they'll announce something new before then. is there anything comparable to these 2 cameras from other manufacturers? i was looking at the sony rx100's but they feel like garbage in the hand. weather sealing is pretty important too considering my lifestyle (outdoorsy in the rainy pacific northwest)
>XT4 sold out everywhere in legit stores>available on grey market ebay storesHave any of ya'll bought grey market stuff? How much of a risk is it really? I never had any issues with my A7ii when I bought it new, but idk.
>>3851371>They have the most bang for your bucklmao nothey give you subpar APS-C performance at FF prices and look like shit.
>>3851404which country? they're available at a bunch of canadian online retailers like vistek and cameracanada for a retarded price. only a $250 premium over US pricesmake sure you buy from an authorized reseller in your country if you care about warranty. this applies to pretty much every warranty fyi
Well boys, I've got a Zorki 4 en route to me.What am I getting myself into?A while back an anon mentioned not to cock the shutter before advancing the film.Are there any other little things like that I should know?Anons who have experience with these pls share wisdoms.
>>3851421>which country?US Based. I was probably going to buy used anyway so warranty isn't an issue for me. This store on ebay has them dirt cheap.>ebay.com/itm/224074895857
>>3851450Why did you buy the thing if you know nothing about it?This is just a feeble attempt to get attention and affirmation.
>>3849106sony a7 most expensive version you can get. accept no substitute.
>>3851256the soviets did. But why would you want too ?
>>3851450Depending on the life it led before you it might need to get light leak proofed mostly with black tape and black paint and it might need the rf cam calibrated. I did all this when i bought a 30 quid fed 4 a few years back and mostly they are just heavy and you doubt all you take on it unlike a similar age slr so you end up shooting mostly landscape or buildings at f 8.
>>3851507Maybe it was all he could afford you faggot.
>>3851507It was cheap and purely mechanical.
>>3851522Ah, so the first few rolls could just be figuring out how to get the thing in focus.That's not so bad all things considered.
>>3851316>>g5x II 24-120 / f1.8-2.8
>>3850093Compare cropped shots from that camera to the latest iphone or w/e. The sony blows those out of the water. It’s an excellent camera and that’s a really good price.
>>3851647I ended up buying it today. It was via craigslist, I saw that he dropped it to $250 today so I sent a $200 offer and he accepted. It was listed for 4 days so I must have been his first response, he seemed happy to get rid of it anyhow. Worse case is I don't like it and sell it on ebay for a profit
>>3851670forgot pic[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 11Camera Software13.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:03:30 22:52:21Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.25 mmImage Width3024Image Height4032Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3851381Bear in mind that the equivalence I mentioned applies to DoF (ability to produce bokeh, in other words). When it comes to exposure, f/1.8 is f/1.8. But the baseline noise is a bit higher on the g5x2.An intermediate would be the Four Thirds sensor cameras, bigger sensor than the g5x2 but smaller than the g1x3. There you have the LX100, the LX100 II and the D-Lux 7 (essentially a Leica branded LX100 II worth 400 more bucks).Faster glass but even less range (24-75mm f/3.4-5.6 equivalent).
>>3851670Congrats. That camera is my every day companion. It’s good.
hey /p/all my camera gear got destroyed in a fire, I need to buy ALL new gear, tripods, bags, SD cards, batteries.>prefer Canon but Im willing to check out other brands Bodies Im considering range wildly in price,Canon 6D2Canon 5D4Canon 5DSCanon 90DCanon R5Im also considering going balls deep with a GFX 100s, though Id have to put some of that on a CC and would then have to wait to get glassBeing weather sealed is a must and I like the idea of IBIS. Video is secondary to stills and I like flippy screens. I prefer the ergos of Canon as that what Im used to using and thats what Im used price shopping for.>inb4 the one i have with me>i currently have none
>>3851705Are you more of a wide or a telephoto guy?Also if considering the R5 why not the 1D X III too? Similar price if I'm not mistaken, gets most of the AF and other fancy features other than 4K and is reflex and nice.
>>3851502Both Amazon and Adorama have x-t4s in stock right now. I think warranties on bodies are important.
>>3851708wideI like landscape and urban decay and weird angles, which is why I like flippy screens. Im in a lot of old buildings with no power so I prefer FF with a high base ISO. I shoot offhand a lot which is why Id like to have IBIS, like in the R5, so that I dont have to worry about getting a lens with IBIS built in, and I can just get the faster stuffHOWEVERI do want to move into weddings and protraiture.
>>3851708>Also if considering the R5 why not the 1D X III too?size and weight
>>3851714All that screams full frame to me, so you can forget about the 90D as nice as it is.6D Mark II seems like the obvious choice to me aside from IBIS.>a lens with IBIS built inSorry to be pedantic but you mean IS. IBIS is "in body image stabilization" lol.An alternative could be the Pentax K1 Mark II.Has IBIS, video is secondary as you said, the screen is beyond flippy, the work of madmen. Some anon posted pic related a while ago, it reminded me of a chainlink 4x4 Jeep I saw a while ago contorting to climb some rocks. Granted, it's not just the screen but the tripods doing weird stuff there but the point stands.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone XRCamera Software14.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:02:13 12:44:21Exposure Time1/57 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.25 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4032Image Height3024Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3851714Forgot video, witness this insanity:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmluFxZDzC8
What to buy with 4000$, my current camera is d3200, 50mm 1.4, and 105mm macro lenses
>>3851720That's a really cool screen articulation design.
>>3850093RX100 lineup post v3 are pretty decent for point and shoot.I bought an RX100M5A(Differences between the M5 is little to nothing) about a year and a half ago when it was on sale for about $700ish.I could have gone for an upgraded A6XXX version, but I've already moved onto full frame.Quality is alright, but the right lens on the A6000 still manages to do better, obviously because bigger sensor.However the features you get such as a built in ND filter.Versions 6+ they changed the fstop and changed range from 24-70mm to 24-200mm. The minimum focal distance changed from 5cm to 8cm too.Sony seemed to have moved the 24-70mm lens to their new vlogging cameras, but those lack a viewfinder.Overall the lineup is pretty decent for point and shoot, however they barely get any firmware updates.Pic related for size comparison between a a6000, rx100m5a, and an a7iii.
>>3851732>Forgot pic[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSonyCamera ModelXQ-AT52Camera Software58.1.A.3.87_0_0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2021:03:31 13:17:48Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/1.7ISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.11 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3851720>>3851718Ive considered pentax, Im bot sure that they have the longevity to stick around for a while, and while that screen is neat, its german car neat, which means I feel like it would be easy to break
>>3851746They will stick around, they're Ricoh's pet project.Also that screen is sturdy as fuck.
>>3851772why would you want this
>>3851772As cool as that is, I can't see how that is better than a side flippy out screen.
>>3851705R5 is the absolute best choice if you can afford it.5Ds is basically equal to R5 in stills IQ but video is poor by comparison (1080p with no video AF).5D4 stills IQ not as good, but it does have video DPAF and 4k (though cropped).6D2 is "worse" stills IQ (though still good), DPAF video but only 1080p.90D is a great camera but if you have the money I have to say go FF.
What format is this softbox mount and how can I possibly adapt it to Bowens or a regular speedlite head? Tightening the screws doesn't give enough grip
>>3851914It allows you to use it from some odd angles, it's not necessarily better but different. It can do things the swivel screen can't, and the swivel screen can do things flex-tilt can't. And most importantly, it's an articulated screen on a full frame camera that gets awesome resolution. With the 5D variants lacking it and the 90D being 1.6 crop and anon being a wide angle guy it seemed like an option he'd want to be aware of. Because as far as Canon goes the only FF DSLR with a flippy screen is the 6D II.Pentax has best in class weather sealing, pixel shift for those insane resolution pictures, IBIS, it's a really neat package. Pentax cameras are labors of love.
>>3851406>look like shitI'm sorry for your plebeian taste anon.
>>3851406Retard alert retard alert
>>3849106i was like you. get sony
>>3851634fucking google it you slack jaw reatard. Fed 1 and zorki
>>3852069You probable weren't here before the Viltrox era when Fujishooters were crying and begging for Sigma to save them from overpriced fujiiflm lenses.The desperation got so extreme that they sighed in relief when Viltrox offered their X-mount a Full Frame 85mm lens.
>>3851594what i did was set the lens to infity go outside and point at moon or a moutain or something in far inifity see if the patch matches in the viewfinder. in my case it didnt so i had to rotate the cam inside the camera. then got a mice meter stick put the camera on a tripod and outside just so there is good light put a flat piece of wood exactly one meter from the surface of the wood to the film plane of the camera. and then i was getting focused.
>>3851670you s=did alright kid
>>3851705It requires giving up your interest in IBIS, but you owe it to yourself to check out Nikon. They're really the reining king of DSLRs. They have plenty of lenses with IS so you really don't need it in the body. It seems you prefer the DSLR form factor. The D780 is a good more affordable option and a very modern camera, and the D850 is the reining champ of DSLRs to date from any manufacturer.If you're open to mirrorless, the related picture may be relevant. The R5 is the big boy on the block but there are things it isn't the best at.
>>3852098>220 shots battery lufeIf I could go back in time and tell the 5Dm2 fanboys about Canon's future cameras, they would probably have heart attacks.
Is the fuji 35mm 1.4’s ‘magic’ rendering down to focus fall off and it not always being strongly contrasty? If so, does the supposed magic reduce when stopped down to f8 vs 1.4? Hard to find good discussion about the character of the lens that isn’t all focused on f1.4 or f2.
>>3852160all lenses at a given focal length start to look identical when they're stopped down that much.
>>3852160>buy f1.4 lens>shoot at f8Why? Might as well use your phone.
>>3852163Completely false.>>3852265Landscape and street photogs all shoot those lenses in f4-f8 range. There's more to good glass than just depth of field.
>>3852265>Why? Might as well use your phone.Completely false. A real sensor still has more depth of field at f/8, and has significantly better quality across the board at all apertures.
own nex6 for 8 years + now, looking at ebay someone selling it for $200. is this camera really that bad ?
>>3852303Autofocus technology has evolved.Dynamic range improvements have evolved.Power efficiency has evolved. (the gradual refinement from 6000->6300->6400)Mainly those three.
>>3852303No, but all electronics has finite life span, and it's getting shorter with each year. There are even reasons to suspect built in obsolescence. Chances are high that you'll get one that will work for few months, then it's either costly repair, if it's even serviceable, or back to ebay.
>>3852308>no lenses>snoyi color science>one (1, UN, UNO, ICHI, EINS) control dialPlease refrain from shilling this utter garbage on this board until they improve ergonomics and make some lenses for it.
>>3852325It's the system with the best APS-C lenses.Not even DSLRs had F2,8 coverage from 17mm to 180mm.
What are my options as far as cold-shoe flashes go?I hardly ever use a flash to begin with, but if there's a cheap flash for a cold-shoe I might pick one up just in case.Also, what other neat stuff can I get to stick in the cold-shoe?I've got a little viewfinder that'll mount to one, but that's a bit redundant.I've heard that there's a light meter you can get for that, but I've already got a handheld meter. Would a meter that mounts to the camera have any real benefit over the handheld?
>>3852088Makes sense.I'll give something like that a go when it all arrives.
>>3852084Look again at the thing you're posting.
>tfw a massive slut for the aesthetics of the Pentax K and M series lenses>tfw theyre getting pricy now cause people buy them instead of the original m42 onesit hurtswish NZ had a better domestic market, shit gets pumped up way too high just cause of a lack of domestic 2nd hand stock
Just noticed that Fotodiox has a dumb Fuji to Nikon Z adapter now.I wonder if someone will manage to cram AF into it like TechArt did with the TZE-01.
Some big brained ppl help a newfren as my phone feels shit for this specifically>want to take pics of my scale models >mostly 1/35 tanks, 300x150x80mm objects more or less that I want sharp and detailed on solid color blurred backgroundWhat cheap lenses for this specifically? Macro ones seem way out of my price range right now even second hand but maybe I'm looking the wrong type of stuff. I can get adapters so mount type is irrelevant to me at this point. I have a sony a6000 if that matters, only the body so far.
>>3852733Get an old manual focus macro lens that does 1:1 and an adapter. There are a bunch of options if you google around.
Is there anyone here who has shot with a Fuji GF medium format camera? Will I really notice any substantial leap in image quality over full frame canikon?
>>3852861the same jump from apsc to ff, you'll notice from ff to mf.
>>3852863>>the same jump*Slightly smaller jump.
I justed boughted a snoy
>>3852895What lenses did you plan on getting with it?
>>3852895My condolensces.I'd rather kill myself than shoot with a sony.
>>3852910>Not shoorting with the best lenses with the fastest autofocus motor and the best optical quality[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1920Image Height1080
>>3852914I shoot medium format film
GAS overcame me and I just dropped over $2k on a 100-400
>TTArtisans 35mm 1.4Thoughts on this lens? It's only 100 euros where I live.
>>3853000It's cool that they print the diagram of the optics on the side like that.Much better than a logo.
I only have a nifty fifty, is it worth getting macro extension tubes? Or is it a gimmick
How do I cope with the brittle plastics of my mju IIs? On another the film door latch is broken and it randomly starts spooling.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1755Image Height1755Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3852895sorry for your loss anon
>>3853383Many such cases, I count at least 4 Sony setups in this shot. Two G-master ones, and two G zooms.
>>3853292They do work but focus is really hard to get and sometimes you can get really soft corners from using extenders on a non-macro lens
>>3852895You gotta do what you gotta do.
>>3852098Sony's 1.44M "dot" 800x600 display is an embarrassment at this point.
>>3853733Some reviewers have the most retarded take on Sony EVF>Hahah that EVF sucks, so low resolution>N-noooo! Sony why did you use such high resolution EVF? REMOVE IT
>>3853733my a7iii only has a 921,600 dot LCD and it looks fine to me, but it's the only real camera i've ever had, so i have nothing to compare it to.
Can i make something decent out of a canon eos D1000 with a good lens?
>>3853838>>3853840With a prime lens, probably yeah.
I'm torn between the g90m, x-t30 and a6400. Kit lens for now mainly for portrait/food and video as I like filming.>ib4 the one without onions/worms/insert memehelp a newfriendo out to graduate from phone
>>3853874Just stick to your smartphone.The Panasonic has crappy autofocus.The Sigma overheats to 140 degree farhenheit in normal usage.The Sony only does 8-bit video.The camera market is in its deathbed due to the manufacturers insisting on having flaws like these deliberately.
>>3853874>The Sigma overheatsMean to say Fujifilm overheats.
>>3853766Wtf, who said that?
>>3853941Tony Shillthrup.If you're going into the rabbithole you will he he was bitching at the A7Siii, and his sycophants will argue:>video centric cameras shouldn't have EVFBut then you get a whole other rabbit hole of hypocrisy where it's okay for Panasonic video cameras to have EVF, but not okay for Sony viceo cameras to have EVF.
>>3853943>video centric cameras shouldn't have EVFI think him and the autistic Sigma FP best still camera guy would get along swimmingly. What a horribly, horribly dumb take.
>>3853387i see you maryland bro
Is the lower IQ worth it for the portability of the Canon G9 X compared to competitors? I have an Olympus XZ-1 but it just doesn't fit in a pocket.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>38491065d3/d800 or if you want to be inspector gadget; k1
Okay so I have a Sigma 28-80mm aspherical lens that came from a sigma SA-5 that I bought from a yard sale. I want to put this lens on a EOS rebel T7 canon. Are there any mounts available that could help me with this?
>>3854158>Muh iqBro stop obsessing
How does iso compare now to 10 years ago?
>>3854209You can use iso 6400 on any camera today VS being barely useable on a 2011 FF camera
>>3854196Nope. Ironically, because the Sigma SA mount is so similar to the EF mount on your Canon, there's basically no way to adapt the one to the other.On the plus side, the lens you have there is a super cheap third-party kit zoom, so you can get a lens just like it with the EF mount for less than fifty bucks.
>>3854199so you shoot with a 2008 iPhone 3G then?
>>3854251Whatever looks pleasing is good enoughThe one you have with you and all that[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>3854211Good to know.I always tried to keep it 400 or lower on my old cameras...
>>3853902this lol, X-T30 is a fucking ovenwhy do you call it Sigma tho?>>3853903Oh nvm.>>3853874I'd get the a6400. Sure, 8-bit isn't the greatest but with the right profile it delivers.The Panasonic is nice and I don't see the point of AF in video, but for portraits you want a bigger sensor.
>>3854196You need to swap mounts and maybe some parts. It's doable, the SA lenses use the EF protocol.
>>3854312>You need to swap mounts and maybe some parts. It's doable, the SA lenses use the EF protocol.The parts would cost more than a genuine EF 28-80 f/3.5-5.6.
>>3853381Reflect on falling for a meme.
>>3854326Not really, you can buy pretty any broken Sigma lens for EF to use as a donor.
>>3854486>Not really, you can buy pretty any broken Sigma lens for EF to use as a donor.Not necessarily. The mount part of the lens might be slightly different depending on the model lens (e.g., the hole at the back might be a different size depending on how much the rear element moves between the donor lens and his SA lens).Additionally, while it's true that the SA protocol is just EF in a trenchcoat and sunglasses, it's *Sigma's implementation* of EF, which has not always been a perfect imitation. Notably, older Sigma lenses designed for film-era EOS bodies often don't work properly on modern digital bodies (or even the final generation of film bodies). So there's no guarantee that the EF protocol being spoken by his SA lens would be compatible with the EF protocol being spoken by his modern T7.Regardless, even if it is possible and he gets ahold of a Canon-mount version of that same lens, it's still going to be a non-trivial effort to convert. I did some googling and the process likely involves soldering, for instance. So maybe he'll save twenty bucks or so, but it's gonna be a hassle, and he might be out even more money if it's his first time soldering (remember: heat the work, not the solder).And even if everything goes perfectly, the reward is... A shitty film-era kit lens that only has slightly more reach and much less image quality than his kit lens. Oh, and now he doesn't have a lens for his Sigma camera body if he ever wants to shoot with that.Here: https://www.keh.com/shop/canon-ef-28-80mm-f-3-5-5-6-ii-standard-zoom-lens.htmlGenuine Canon EF 28-80, forty-three bucks. Or even better, spend a little bit more and get a lens that's actually worth spending any money on. Frankly, the Sigma 28-80 f/3.5-5.6 is not worth the amount of time we've spent discussing it.
Thoughts on the gorilla tripod?
>>3854158check the g9x ii flickr groups, if you like what you see, then it should be fine.
>snagged a Pentax-M 200mm f4nito should be fun
I got hit up on my phone from a foreign number asking about my camera and if I could ship through DHL to her address in London, payment is through PayPal.I've only posted this on a local webpage and i live in South America, why would somebody from London want to pay for me to ship a Fuji X-H1? Not a weird camera not hard to get there easier. Sounds fishy don't it?
>>3854667I even sent her a screenshot of eBay UK, asked her if It's worth her while and said it is. To be honest I've been trying to sell this thing for months and no dice, shipping would be like 90 bucks, i could substract that now and sell it locally no problem (asking 770 + grip).
>>3854667thats been happening to random fb page listing here in NZ, full on scammake sure you have the ability to guarantee you have the money at the end of the day if it leaves your care
>>3854673Paypal goods and services should do that no? 3% fee is for insurance, I've only sold through eBay, but I guess I'll take an L and lower it locally.
>>3854657Related there's a Tamron K mount 70-200 AF that im hoping I can snag on an auction this weekFuck I hope the boomers dont shoot the price up too far on a 20yr old lens design
should I buy a nikon z6 for 900
>>3854830It would have changed the course of history if Nikon had launched Z6 at that price.
recommend me some small ef compatible lensesgetting sick of hauling around giant glass[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>3854901The 40mm f2.8? Need to learn how to use a lens that gives barely any subject separation.
Newbie here. Is the Canon SX 740 still a decent option for a point and shoot camera for $400? Or am I better off with something else now? I do like the 40x zoom.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution216 dpiVertical Resolution216 dpiImage Width1125Image Height1597
i like mirrorless cameras!
would a Panasonic GF1 + 14mm 2.5 be a good substitute for a Ricoh GR Digital (the old one with a 10mp CCD sensor)?
>>3855028What did you like about the Ricoh?
>>3855029i liked the "retro-digital" colors and the fixed 28mm equiv focal length. unfortunately mine broke and finding another one in good condition isn't easy anymore. i'm looking for something that's similar but cheaper than the new APS-C GR
Is the canon fd 35mm f2 really worth the 300$ or is the Nikkor AIS 35mm f2 the better option? not worry about camera because adapters
>>3854973That thing has the sensor size of a 5 year old smartphone.Useless in anything other than daytime, and while a lot of people "like" the idea of huge zooms, most of the time they don't actually need it.
>>3855564>Implying newer phones have bigger sensors
>>3855575Even a budget (~$150) phone nowadays has a 1/2" sensor. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a 1/1.12" main sensor, Huawei's upcoming phone will use a 1/1.18".
>>385490124mm pancake50 1.8 stm50 1.4 usm (lovely piece)
Do I make a bad but fun decision?https://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=3034881352
>>3855638>https://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=3034881352kek, you should go take some photos at a few mosques ;)
>>3855639>work a 10min walk away from The Mosquegod such a bad idea but so tempting
>>3855036I'd go with a GM5 for the EVF, but your option wasn't bad, I'll say, that lens felt particularly dreadful to me (the 14/2.5), i have the 20/1.7 and it's much better to use and take pictures with.
New 24mm F1,8 FE lens from Samyang.And a new APS-C, presumably also E-mount.
Do you wear camera gloves?
>>3855878Looks like some gay street photog onions shit to me
>>3851691I'm loving this camera, was perfect on my overnight hike this weekend
>>3855564What would you recommend then for a point and shoot with a budget around $400?
New lens to mess around with! Getting a F to K convertor too so I can use it with my film setup
>>3856716Tokina 400mm fixed f8 Mirror lensIm surprised how close focusing it is
Dear /gear/, I kindly ask for your opinion on planning on Nikon camera.Right now, I have D5300 with three lenses: two DX ones (35mm 1.8 and 18-105mm 3.5-5.6) and one "normal" (Sigma 70-200mm 2.8). Since I finally got a job, I can start planning out buying full frame camera I saved money for before. I was thinking about D750 and, since crop lenses are unsuitable, Nikkor 24-120mm f/4 ED VR. Total budget would be around 6000 pln which is equivalent of 1335 EUR, all gear would be used one. However, I wanted first to ask for opinion.I was thinking about stretching budget bit and buy some 50mm lens since I very often use that 35mm but Im not sure if it would work nicely with full frame. Was thinking about used Zeiss (50mm 1.4) but are there more reasonable options? Also, is D750 still good choice for Nikon full frame? I might not realize importance of other factors here but 850 seems just to use bigger MP count, which might not be beneficial, especially when I tend to shoot with low light conditions, by hand and indoors. Meanwhile, their mirrorlens seems to be too expensive for what they offer (plus, I would need to buy that special type of memory and adapters for lenses). I also found cheaper than normal 750 body but with 200k photos taken and Im worried if this would affect its overall life greatly. What's your opinion?Thank you for any advice or reply.
>>3856760the 50mm 1.8 nikkor is solid anon, cant really go wrong, and no real reason to go for a faster one unless you really feel you need it
>>3856763>>3856760should add theyre also quite cheap used
>>3856760nikon z5 + ftz adapter + nikkor z 50mm f/1.8 is arguably the finest 50mm you can buy, and worth the price of body alone. bodies are dirt cheap ebay.
>>3856763Zeiss really won't be any sharper or anything?>>3856766I have to add that Im from Europe so no eBay for me. I checked local offers and there are no used Z5 bodies, only new ones for 7000 PLN which is already way too much. Instead I found used Z6 at price of used D750 but without adapter and with 220k photos on count. Would that suggest it being completely wear off?
>>3856773I mean a bit but like sharpness on 50mm primes faster than f2 is a logarithmic curveyou get pretty heavy diminishing returns for the cost
I want to try some diffusion filtersThe choice seems to be between Moment's Cinebloom and Tiffan's Black Pro-Mist but I can't seem to find any objective reviews since Moment sent out free copies to anyone with a following greater than 5,000
I’m thinking about getting a drawing tablet to add to my photo editing workflow and to get into drawing. I’m looking at two models, one has better color, the other has a better resolution. Which one should I go with?
>>3856886you can also ask /ic/, drawing tablet general thread. I have no experience with desktop screen tablets since I still use my old Intous for editing if needed and use my Galaxy Tab instead for drawing. I'd probably choose better color or at least if I choose resolution, the screen of the tablet can be correctly calibrated with a colorimeter if that's possible so it matches with my monitor.
>>3856886probably one without a screen unless you're spending a lot of money
Just to be sure - when buying used bodies, how much photo count suggest very short expected life of motor? I assume that few thousand is okay, 20-30k less but still okay but when talking about numbers like 200k?
>>3856948You do realize you can replace shutters, it is a routine operation at every camera service. Plus after the rated life the shutters mostly just become less precise so only in the highest shutterspeeds you'll see some variance in exposure
>>3856948200k is usually around what decent bodies are rated for which means they should last at least that long. That being said some will die early and others go on past 1 millionFind the shutter rating for whatever camera you're looking at, if it's 200k and the one you're about to buy is at 50k then you know it's a quarter through the minimum expected life and should have at least 150k more shots with it, but there's no guarantee
>>3856978>routine operation at every camera serviceBut at what cost? I mean, if it's used stuff, it surely will be paid service.As for fast shutter speeds - like 90% of time I rarely goes above 1/300, once or twice went above 1/500. So it would be less of a problem?>>3856980This one have listed 150k according to what I found so its already 50k past that. So I guess I could expect it to fail soon?
>>3857099Who cares? The body is the least of your costs in photography.
>>3856559I use a Panasonic Lumix ZS100 and I really like it. It's a step above a point & shoot, has a 1 inch sensor. Takes really good photos and has decent zoom. Sturdy metal body and has full manual controls. Was about $700 at launch in 2016 but it's available new for $400 now.
>>3856559Get a MFT camera, maybe Olympus OM-D E-M10 II or Lumix GX85
>>3857268Two or three times more than cost of used lenses - in my taste, its pretty significant. I cant afford throwing money on something that might turn out to be garbage.
>>3851287>All cameras that aren't flagships are compromise cameras. Even flagships are compromise cameras often./p/
>>3851734(and only one of those fits in a pocket)
>>3857478It's true though. You could say the same about any engineered product. Race cars are a compromise, they're costly, loud, can seat only one guy, have terrible fuel economy, aren't even road legal because they don't even have the needed lights. Flagship cameras can't be too expensive or they won't sell, as a result of being sub-10k products there's a number of features they don't have. The AF systems they use are also a compromise because of patents. The optical designs are compromises too because Sony wanted to make APS-C cameras and then when the time of full frame came they got either limited apertures or soft corners. And Nikon compromised portability with their designs. Higher res cameras compromise low light performance compared to the A7S series and GH5S series, I could go on.
I've got a Nikon Z5 with the 24-200 zoom lens.It can barely autofocus indoors, even with good light.I use single point AF and AF-S, and it starts vibrating for literally 5 seconds before the focus point turns green.Then I take the picture and it's out of focus.I tried turning on Low-Light AF, and it instead takes 10 seconds and tanks the EVF refresh rate.Then I found that switching to pinpoint AF provides correct focus every time, but it's still slowish (about 2 seconds), and doesn't speed up any when in bright light/outdoors.Is this normal behavior? Shouldn't pinpoint AF take longer, since it's providing the AF system with LESS information to work with? Is there something wrong with my phase-detect system?
>>3857738>I dropped my camera and now it doesn’t workIf it’s under warranty try and get it replaced
>>3857739>I wish, that would be easy to understand at leastI might have to look into that.
>>3857738It could be the lens, it could be the body, and it could be something you did in the settings.
>>3857738A relatively slow focus lens coupled with a D750 fitted inside a ML body. Strange choice m8, should've gone used Z6.Also exactly like >>3857739 said.
Not really a gear but:What companies/websites/process do you guys go through to get prints made? Canvas included?
>>3857747Nikon is generally not a safe brand to buy into regardless.As it is right now, Tamron and Sigma could give the deathblow to the Z-mount if they announce their full support for RF mount while ignoring the Z-mount, thus signalling to every photographer that the industry doesn't really believe Z has a future.
>>3857790Who the fuck cares stock runner, an Olympus and a Samsung work just as good today as they did when their companies were alive.If you are thinking about reselling or playing biz games instead of taking photos then you are lost.
>>3857790anyone with expensive SIgma/Tamron F mount will probably just be using their FTZ adapter, (same with EF to RF) its' wise to rely on that a bit longer rather than release something too early and have it die in the ass, but ultimately not supporting Z mount would just be a lost opportunity for them which is a pretty stupid business move
>>3857796>but ultimately not supporting Z mount would just be a lost opportunity for them which is a pretty stupid business moveI'm not so sure about this. Sigma and their L-mount friends would be happy to see a competitor withdraw.They actually hold a significant power to help RF step on Z-mount.People will raise eyebrows if thos etwo companies support E and RF, but not Z.Same way when they cut support for A-mount and K-mount a handful years back.
>>3857795Gearfags don't care about actual shooting, only everything else.
>>3857790>Nikon is generally not a safe brand to buy into regardless.lmao either they have the lenses that suit your needs or they dont. who gives a fuck if they might one day release a 300mm f/1.8, it literally doesn't matter.either they sell the photographic tools you need, or they dont. and if they dont you shop elsewhere.all this bullshit about "investing" and "safe brands" and "buying into", lmfao you've cucked yourself so badly.
>>3857808Would you actually recommend others to buy into Olympus today though? given what you know happened to Samsung?
Just to clarify, about question from yesterday - D750 is still good choice if I want to move from D5300 and crop sensor into full frame?
>>3857860no, its one of the more mediocre choices
>>3857865And what is good choice?
>>3857798That would just signal to everyone that they can’t compete with the superior native Z mount glass and they would be laughed out of production
>>3851732hows the low light performace of the rx100va? how acceptable is it by your standards? I also have an a6000 for comparison.
>>3857402I hate to break it to you, but if you worry about costs than this is not the hobby for you.
>>3857929Worked out so far. I just don't want to waste money like the last time where I bought wireless flash controller and never used it since then.
I used to have a Canon EOS 7D and I want something that's affordable but a step up from that as far as picture quality goes, it doesn't need to have a super fast shutter because I'm not a sports photographer.What camera do you think it would be? The 5D? 7D Mark 2? A super old 1D?
I had this Samsung NX 2000 for a couple of weeks, like 6 years ago.I broke it while trying to get inside an abandoned power plant. Still miss this camera, the photos looked super good and they had a unique feel to them. So much better than an entry level Nikon D3200 for instance.Most underrated beginner camera ever. Probably only because you can't find lenses for it.
Question - when deciding between Nikon D750 and D810, which one is more reasonable choice and why?
>>3857892Are you sure Canonfags would laugh at Sigma if they released the DG DN lenses on RF?I think a lot of RF people would be happy with another option.It would be the Z customers who gets jealous, and some of them will regret buying into Z-mount seeing how low the support is.
>>3858137But why? From what I see, advantage of 810 is longer shutter life expectancy (200k vs 150k) and 36MP instead of 25MP but 750 have wireless connection, tilting screen and better low light performance.
>a7R IIIA>a7R IVASony ushering in the next age of confusing naming schemes.
>>3857996>which one is more reasonable choiceTwo different cameras, i would choose a 810 because of its better build and i think it's a bit cheaper.>wireless connection, tilting screenOne is for fags and the other depends on your style, if you like hip shooting a lot then i agree that's a big factor.Low light is similar, if you downsize from 36 to 24 the results are pretty much the same and both have stale colours anyways compared to the old cameras, the D700/D3 or the Df/D4 are unmatched in that aspect. In terms of video the 810 cries in pain, the D750 would be the better option there.I would choose neither for my specific style but in your case the sole fact that you considered wireless homosexuality and tilting screen as considerable perks makes me believe you would be better with a 750.
>>3858184I see they took a page out of their headphone department's book
>>3858216They ran out of inventory of their old ass low resolution LCD panels, and the newers ones are likely cheaper.Aos the cheapest solution for them was to change LCDs.The addition of 'A' is just to avoid lawsuits from customers of previous iteration.
>>3858188What's the problem with wireless? Honestly. Tilting screen helped me at least couple of times so I consider it important. And, to be honest, it also lets me hide screen without worry that I will scratch it.
>>3858251I have the wireless thing on my canon, shit only transfers jpegs and not RAW files.
>>3858258This, Nikon wireless is ass, slow and a pain to connect, not to mention the random disconnects. Eye-Fi card works much better.
>>3858251>>3858258>>3858348my canon does raw wirelessit's not something i was looking for in a camera (i upgraded from a rebel xt lmao) but damn it's handyit's pretty shit for bulk but for getting a few pictures out of it quickly on the go it's perfect a feature i wouldn't want to go without now that i'm used to it, frankly
Need some advice.I got a trio of vintage lenses that are very nice, sharp (for a vintage lens) fast, and have "character" (radial bokeh, nervous bokeh on one of them, vignetting)They are all 3 worth about 600usd, i was considering selling my X100 + lenses and buying one nice prime that makes use of my sensor and doesn't have that "character". I have seen what some people do with the lenses I got and i bought them for that reason, but sharpness and AF doesn't seem so bad.A7R3
Just picked this up today. I know what it excels at, but are there any cons? What can I expect out of it? I can't shoot until the weekend.
>>3858389Sell good vintage lenses for new good lens, yes or no.
>>3858379>What does it excel atPhotos>What can I expect from itPhotos>I can't shoot until the weekendWhy?
>>3858394I meant the limitations more so. I can't shoot because I'm ~300 miles away from my camera body.
>>3858379the only stuff this lens is not so good is action shots since the AF can be 'slow'. you can use it to everything tho
>>3858375Sure, there are quite a lot of sharp lenses. The E-mount has many of them 1st and 3rd party.The A7R III only has decent AF, but the A7 III is faster and later models like the A7R IV or A9 II even faster / yet more reliable at tracking. Quite noticeable with just about any lens that works.
>K3-iii finally out>suddenly thinking about if Id rather have it or the K1-ii since they cost the same and id be using it for sports mainlygod dammit why is spending 4 grand so hard(nz money)
>>3853000the 35 f0.95 is more appealing to meimo if you're going to get MF it has to have some sort of neat hook
>>3858716That's a 7Artisans, and while I considered it the corners just seem really bad at the widest aperture, and more importantly the higher price is a bit to close to lenses with similar focal lengths that have autofocus, wihch is what I'd prefer over an f-stop.
>>3853902Pany AF is fine for photos and you really shouldn’t be using AF for video unless you’re cum-guzzling vlogger.
>>3858719>Protestor runs towards you to punch you in the face>autistic MF'er concentrate on getting him in focus>Chad AF'er leaved the AF tracking to camera while running away
>>3858717Get Meike instead. It's better 35mm f1.4.
I noticed the Korean lens maker is more logical and practical, while the Japanese lens makers are dogmatic traditionalists.>Focus ring>most of the time you're in AF mode where focus ring is deactivated>Might as well enable it for Aperture if you were going to disable it anywayMeanwhile in Japan>we just do it the way it's always been done
>>3858717well you just answered your own questionsave up for an AF 35 1.4
>>3858732Canon has copied it. It's just controllable in camera, and not on the lens.
>>3858753That's different. They added an additional ring into the lens.The Samyang one reuses the one ring they have. I guess this is the inferior to having multiple rings, but it saves cost.
>>3858732does it still need a docking station for firmware upgrade?
>>3858762Of course.Either due to>Japanese corporations being aholes to non japanese lens makersor>Korean corporation too prideful to ask for E-mount licence
>>3858699>using it for sports mainlyK-3 MkIII hands down. Get a Tamron 70-200/2.8 IF Macro, it is screwdrive but focuses fast and the image is godly
I'm buying a black MIJ 43mm Limited lens. Wish me luck, bros
>>3858699Order from the us b it's much cheaper (1200 cheaper)
large as in FF, or Large format?
>>3858732>>3858755Sounds like a nightmare to me. Canon with its overrideable AF is superior.
>>3858699>full frame for sportsAre you serious?
>>3859399Manual override is a different mode you can activate in mirrorless. Your way of doing it is the inferior one that causes extra friction which results in more noise, more battery waste, and slower AF.Why else did you think Canon copied Sony and moved towards focus by wire in RF?
Heya, NZ auction anon hereDo you guys think these are decent offers or should I be prepared to go higher or hold on for a cheaper listing?https://www.trademe.co.nz/3041986694https://www.trademe.co.nz/3039312640Bonus, local store owner lent me a 25mm 3.5 kawanon for the weekend
>>3859428eBay is the better option
>>3859403>Why else did you think Canon copied Sony and moved towards focus by wire in RF?Market pressure. Focus by wire is gay though.
>>3859550>Focus by wire is gay though.It reduces friction and increase AF speed.Count how many times these motors can run the focus range within 1 second:https://youtu.be/wuljHjItkdQ?t=9
>>3859530Don't really have eBay in New Zealand
>>3859579Even internationally and australia would be cheaper desu
>>3859592I guess, Ill take a look but doing international stuff right now sucks big time
>>3859592>>3859597Took a look, most of it was the same or more expensive, without factoring in shippingI was more just asking if the price for those two lenses was blown out or not, mainly the 40mm pancake. 200nzd is like what, 140USD tops?
Holy shiet, the new Samyang lens is hacking the host camera.They tweaked their custom button so it forces the camera into MF mode.Then forces the focus to infinity for astro photography.And there is a red LED that turns green when that happens.>Sony isn't innovating its features enough>Samyang takes matters into their own hand
>>3859692I don't se anything different here, you could always push a button or switch on a lens to switch it into MF mode and the body switched as well, the rest is just automation
>>3859692I'm excited to see what the APS-C offer is, I was about to bid on a 12mm F2 the day they announced these
is Sony A7siii worth it for 2900$ body only?
>>3859794That's Alot of money, but you get 4k @ 120 fps and 1080p @ 240 fps, do you need that?
>>3859550I got my first ever focus by wire lens a year ago and i honestly dont want to go back to shitty gritty ultrasonic lenses and plastic fantastic focus motor disconnect lensesFocus by wire feels as nice and is as accurate as a well fitted and greased vintage manual focus lens but you also get seamless AF, literally no reason to avoid them
>>3859740It's an automation that isn't normaly supported by the camera bodies.
>>3859840>literally no reason to avoid themOne reason: you can't manually focus by feel. If you're shooting street, for instance, being able to pre-focus to a given range so you can shoot from the hip when a good subject walks into that range is invaluable. That being said, a huge percentage of autofocus lenses don't support that in any meaningful way either, so you're really better off adapting on a manual focus lens if you want to do that. I agree that there's not any particularly meaningful difference between an AF lens with mechanical focus but no distance/DoF scale and a focus-by-wire lens.
>>3859806no I guess not haha, I'll just stick to the a7ii
>>3858765meanwhile the chinks just slap a usb port on the mount, defying both
>>3859941Once the lens switched into MF the body doesn't care what it does and how it focuses
>>3859992That's in the past, doesn't apply to focus by wire.The body can opt to make the focusing linear, or it could make the focusing accelerate.They can even adjust the rotation sensitivity of the focus ring.
>>3859990You are referring to Viltrox?I don't think they have done anything drastic with the Focus rings, they are not really at the stage there they can think of lens features yet, they are still in the learning phase of making better optics.
Are there any black and white sensors that arent stupidly overpriced (like that leica model)?
>>3860199Nah, and there is probably no point. Even if you have more common color sensors, the pixels involved DO take brightness levels. You can turn that into B&W just fine.
>>3860199B/W images are actually better with colour sensor, because they can correct your lens' chromatic abberation before they convert to black and white.
>>3860203>Even if you have more common color sensors, the pixels involved DO take brightness levels. You can turn that into B&W just fine.I know the science behind light levels, but i forget what specifically makes bw sensors better>>3860204interesting, i use a filter anyway so its not really an issue for me
>>3860206Filters don't affect CA created by the lens..>forget what specifically makes bw sensors betterProbably because they have no bayer moire effect.And maybe less light loss to the colour filters.
>>3860207>Filters don't affect CA created by the lens..red light filter will wont it?i knew it was something related to the subpixels, ty for the primer
>>3860210If you filter off reds, then blues and greens can still need correction.
>>3860212blue-green CA is less noticable than blue-red anyway
>>3860206>I know the science behind light levels, but i forget what specifically makes bw sensors betterNothing actually relevant. Yes, you could avoid the color filters (+.3 EV or something) AND avoid storing color information in files (with some specialized RAW format that might certainly be smaller).But this is virtually irrelevant because in the end the color sensors and cameras got far more work put into them and will have better sensors and camera computers. Because they actually sell well.
>>3851987B U M P UMPHelp a retard out, pls
Just purchased a GX7. What is your opinion of me?
>>3860383I dont care until i see some pics bubby
>>3858750I ended up getting *coof coof*, getting the TTArtisans since a used lens showed up in local listings for like 60 euros, and there's no used AF lenses since I've been paying attention.
why is every ricoh GR digital (the old one with a 10MP CCD sensor) so expensive? they're really overpriced compared to compact cameras with almost identical technical specs like the canon S90. is it the terry tax or do they get confused with the new APS-C GR?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1025Image Height1441Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3859692Sony can take their lens pricing and cram it waaaaay up their ass. Thank god for the sigma mc-11 adapter and also third party lens manufacturers.
>>3860582Tamron is the only manufacturer who offers good quality control at low pricing.All the others fall into two categories.-Expensive lenses that afhere to the MTF due to strict quality control-Cheap lenses with fake MTFs due to no quality controlThe Korean and Chinese lenses fall into the latter.
Looking for some kind of vibration dampener for my dash mount on my car. Driving footage is super shaky and pretty unusable. Anyone happen to know anything I can use for that?
>>3860591Is sigma not affordable compared to 1st party top tier glass? (Think Sony GM or Canon L)
>>3860608Sigma typically charge more than Tamron. But they also have decent quality control.That's why I associate them with the former category.
>>3860608>compared to 1st party top tier glassshoot a self portrait in 9mm faggot you're the worst poster on the entire board
>>3860419congrats anon (:I hope you enjoy itwhat mount?There's been a surprisingly low amount of second hand ef-m lenses going up for sale here, and when they do they're running close to their retail price anyway
>>3860591I’ve got the samyang 35mm f/1.4 and the viltrox 85mm f/1.8 and both lenses have served me well. That being said I’m a hobbyist hack and therefore not the most demanding user.
>>3850093I was really tempted to get a sony rx100m5 or 6 since I found them for sub $500, but I ended up going a canon m200 for slightly cheaper. Can't say I regret my decision either.
>Nikon Z5 for $1299 at Best Buydamn, I just got a full frame for $1800. That would have been one hell of a tempting deal if it was just 1 month earlier
>>3860836>Owning a Nikon at any price
>>3860867Beats owning a Fuji or a Sony. Enjoy your shit ergonomics.
>>3860876Yeah that's why you go Canon.
What about Pentax?
>>3860886heh, I own Canon after having owned Nikon. Both are good but Nikon wins in the ergonomics department.>>3860890I wish I had one but I need the features Canon offers.
>>3860876Nothing beats Sony right now.Their mount has high quality native AF primes for 200 bucks each.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographervpathakImage-Specific Properties:
>>3860915E-mount has 4 manufacturers who have full access to lens protocols.L-mount has 3 manufacturers who have full access to lens protocols.RF has 1 manufacturer with access.Z has 1 manufacturer with access.That's the difference.
>>3860915It may sound crazy but Sigma's lenses actually have better autofocus performance on the Sonys than on Sigma's own cameras.The fp-L had poisoned the meaning of the term "Native AF".
>>3849106what are some camera with dedicated wheels foriso, aperture, speed without having to press anything extra?
>>3860968Modern cameras are ISO invariant. What you should do with such cameras is simply leaving them on auto for the best results.
>>3860971I knowI like shooting manual.. and I was under the impression expensive camera is supposed give me more control
>>3860968my now 11 year old entry level nikon has a wheel that is set to shutter speed by default, then a button that I hold to modify it to aperture, and another button that does ISO, as well as a third button for white balance I dont use too muchjust so you dont have to stare at the screen like a monkey everytime you want to change things
>>3860975Auto-ISO enhances Manual mode and reduces your adjustments to 2 things.Shutter Speed and Aperture.
>>3860976>dedicated wheels >have to press modifier keys
>>3860976ISO isn't a creative adjustment anyway. So the other poster is just stuck inside an old paradigm.In modern ISO invariant cameras, you only have to concern yourself with the real settings that matter.And ISO isn't one of them.
>>3860989>modifier keys are where your fingers would normally rest thereby not requiring any real effort or change in grip to usebut nah fair I guess
>>3860785Thanks my dude. EF-M indeedAll the AF lenses with this focal length are 250-350 euros, and that's the affordable ones, and no used ones at all. I figure 60 euros is fair enough to tide me over, or maybe I won't need more.
Took some sports photos with a new tokina mirror lens but everything came out really softnot sure why, even things where you can see both ends of the depth of field are soft the whole way through
New thread >>3861192New thread >>3861192New thread >>3861192>>3861050Probably a case of you get what you paid. And you probably didn't pay much.The telephoto in the new thread is likely to be decent sharp though.
>>3849106>which MILC should i pic? sony or canon?the one you have with you