>>3825062
you aren't the target audience.
the target audience pays off their MF system in a single session.
pay to play.
stop obsessing over sensor size, it really doesn't matter in 2020.

>>3825063
It’s called target demographic and working photographers don’t net 30k a session. Stop trying to sound like you know money.

File: 8112442631_aa39be1a97.jpg (111 KB, 500x500)

111 KB JPG

>>3825062
Pentax 645Z
645D for poorfag option

File: 0_zO4YhdvYCoYw9MxE.png (326 KB, 640x360)

326 KB PNG

>>3825063
>>3825064
So, should I just forget about it all together? I just want to take landscape photos, and my camera has a fixed 35mm lens on it.

>>3825067
Still so expensive though...

>>3825062
There really isn't an advantage over high resolution FF unless you can afford a 100mp or 150mp body and the glass to match. And because so much money is invested in FF R&D the fastest glass is actually on FF.

As for film, high resolution FF competes with 6x9. Maybe if you're drum scanning Velvia 50 you'll see a small gain. You don't shoot MF film for IQ, you shoot it because you want to shoot film and the IQ gain over 35mm is significant.

File: 6973934C-AE6F-4A05-962E-1(...).jpg (4.38 MB, 4076x4755)

4.38 MB JPG

Just get a film medium format and dev/scan on your own. It’s still pricey, but less than a digital FF setup really. You can get a camera+dev/scan setup for under $1000.

Medium format has a nice distinct look, and it has lots more detail compared to 35mm film. I usually find myself shooting 35mm or aps-c unless I have something specific I want to shoot. You have to print pretty large to actually see the extra detail.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:12:18 04:32:58
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3825070
>I just want to take landscape photos, and my camera has a fixed 35mm lens on it.
Literally just save up for any aps-c or FF camera and a solid UWA zoom. I shot for years on an 18mp 7D with a Tokina 11-16 and have made plenty of 17x22 and 16x24 landscape prints.

>>3825070
If you really only want landscape you can get a Fujica GS645W or GSW690 series.

>>3825070
Try out a 645 system anon. You get all the bells and whistles, good scans run right with any digital back from the first couple generations, good economy. Plus you’re only risking like $1K if you end up not liking it. Unless you just aren’t comfortable with film in general, but if landscapes are your focus you would be cucking yourself not giving film a chance.

>>3825076
Don’t listen to this anon he’s an idiot.

Medium format is fun as hell. Just get an older film camera and go nuts. I have a Mamiya 33C that I use and it's great.

>>3825064
>working photographers don’t net 30k a session
commercial photographers using MF systems do
"wedding" and "event" photographers struggle to put food on tables

>>3825084
How many commercial photographers do you know anon?

>>3825062
>want a thing
>can't afford thing
So, maybe set realistic budgeting goals?

>>3825071
Yea... i’ve been eyeing the mf stuff a bit and it really doesn’t seem to make sense - the f1.2 glass on a high mp ff makes it pointless buying a mf camera - their lenses just can’t create that shallow depth of field so you get more or less the same result when you factor in the shallow dof of the mf sensor. I don’t think i’m wrong here. Am i?

>>3825062
>Guys, I really, really want to shoot medium format.

Why?

Answer that and you might get reasonable advice.

File: checkem cyber.jpg (297 KB, 1024x1024)

297 KB JPG

>>3825104
this

>>3825112
that

Also psst kids, there's this little secret called Brenizer Method.

>>3825062
>really want to shoot medium format.

Why? Your pictures are gonna be the same.

>>3825111
No, you're not wrong, that was the point.

>>3825062
Guess what anon, i am (was) in your spot. I bought my GFX 50R yesterday. Have yet to buy a proper lens.

Do i need it? Hell no
Do i want it? Hell yeah

You SHOULD look for other reasons other than
>big sensor

I honestly had some reasons, those still don't justify spending 3k on a body and none on lenses, but off we go.

The lenses that will do justice to the sensor are terribly expensive, even chink garbage lenses. if you want the "real medium format look" you need fast glass, since you have 51.4mp you might as well buy fast and sharp glass.

A 50mm f1.4 vintage lens will give you the MF look, badly and soft, but it will for less than 100 USD, an adapted Sigma Art 50mm f1.4. will also do that, and it will cost you 1000 USD

I'm about to suck it up and buy that so i can potentially use the sensor to it's fullest instead of using 50 USD optics on a 3k body.

>can you tell me if it's really worth the money?
It's only worth it if you do have some money lying around, you are stupid like me and KNOW you will deeply enjoy the camera for a long while.

>Are there any alternatives, or am I just fucked?

Not really, you could speedboost a Sony A7 with a garbage adapter or use one of those choyna made f0.95 lenses on it, but it's not very ideal, also, landing focus at f0.95 blows.

Earning money or not from photography is an afterthought for me right now but you should definitely consider that, i will try to, 3k-4k of money is no joke.

>>3825084
No one I know doing weddings use MF, the biggest best wedding photographer I know says the huge price, slow expensive lenses and bad AF for a meager quality return don't justify him selling his RF and EF lenses for it.

>>3825070
Just shoot panoramic stitched photos
Or if you really really want to shoot MF get one of these here
https://youtu.be/_6U8f4-2rgw

>>3825185
he doesn't wanna deal with film.

>>3825067
The 645d is a piece of shit to use, no live-view, slow as molasses, tiny buffer. I've seen 645z for 2300.

>>3825186
>he doesn't wanna deal with film.
OK then he probably wants one of these though I suspecr they're not within his budget
► 5. Hasselblad H6D-50c
► 4. Pentax 645z
► 3. Fujifilm GFX 50R
► 2. Hasselblad X1D-50c
► 1. Fujifilm GFX 100
-------------------------------------------------------------------
>>3825062
Good luck OP

File: 26A3B142-AA4A-4279-A5EA-F(...).jpg (122 KB, 427x640)

122 KB JPG

Hello there

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	427
Image Height	640

>>3825290
what camera is that one? why does it says fuji on top?

>>3825062
Rent one. Dynamic range is fantastic, but it's still not good enough to beat exposure stacking for high quality shots. Same goes for resolution, it's great, but panorama stacking can be even better... I used gfx50 interchangeably with m43 for the last two years. At the end each year I'm doing calendars, this year, all but one of the 13 pics came from m43. All 100mp+ panorama stack.

>>3825291
The one you have with you

>>3825294
what did you use your m43 camera for? i have mine just for shits and giggles.

if you really want medium format, get something cheap like the LOMO Lubitel 166 and shoot film. otherwise, just go FF digital with a 50mm f/1.4 if you just want the medium format look

>>3825291
>why does it says fuji on top?
anon thats called a brand. Fuji GX680

>>3825317
FF 50mm f1.4 and the same lens on crop-MF looks a tad different.

It would be a 40mm f1.1, that's a bit unique.

>>3825062
>If there's any MF owners here, can you tell me if it's really worth the money?
Ehhhhh in terms of getting better images, no. A full frame digital camera's images are gonna be indistinguishable from medium format digital in the vast majority of circumstances.

I shoot medium format film because medium format film is noticeably better than 35mm film, but even then, I mainly do it because medium format cameras are fun rather than because of the image quality advantages. Honestly, even 6x7 doesn't look better than (or even as good as!) what I get out of full frame digital, but the process of taking pictures and then having to wait to see the scans is weirdly fun so I keep doing it even though it's crazy expensive.

Maybe look into a "cheap" medium format camera and see if you like it. Antique stores will often have cheap old folding medium-format cameras (but make sure the shutter doesn't stick, the bellows aren't rotting away, and that the camera is designed to take 120 film before you buy one) which you could play around with and see if you enjoy the results (and/or the process) enough to get a better one.

>>3825291
>what camera is that one?
A Fuji GX680
>why does it says fuji on top?
Because it's a Fuji GX680

>>3825332
really didn't know fuji made that kind of bulky cameras, i thought thye only did those similar to the GW690

>>3825335
There’s a reason they aren’t well known

File: F7CEA08B-DA92-47B5-95D7-E(...).jpg (161 KB, 640x480)

161 KB JPG

>>3825335
Its a system made for studio advertisement work, hence the movements, the 6x8 “tabloid” format, the size. I guess the jap ad companies didn’t need monorails for all their work, the 120 was good enough. It’s a fun camera, it was crazy expensive when it came out and the build quality shows. It gets a lot of shit here from onions because it’s large, heavy and awkward to use, but it’s relatively cheap, idiot-proof, the lenses are a work of art, you can turn it into 645, 6x6, 6x7, nobody knows it exists so it’s always a conversation starter. But it’s not something you throw into a bag and carry around, you have to purposefully go out to take pictures, which, for me, is great- I already took the fucker wih me so i *need* to make some photos. Even if they’re boring snapshits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	640
Image Height	480

>>3825344
lmao imagine thinking the ability to shoot 645 on this is a benefit

Nothing in this overpriced tourist attraction of a fucking hobby is worth the price you pay.
Steal one.

File: Brandy_submit2.jpg (49 KB, 759x600)

49 KB JPG

go look at all you're missing out on OP
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/48-pentax-medium-format/87027-post-your-medium-format-photos.html

File: 24717848239_a148b48276_c.jpg (204 KB, 800x788)

204 KB JPG

yessir

File: 25289971553_7229b081ba_c.jpg (118 KB, 800x599)

118 KB JPG

hard to pull these off on 35mm alrighty

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	MATT BURT
Image-Specific Properties:

File: _IMG8230.jpg (142 KB, 675x900)

142 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX 645Z
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 6.7 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	59 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:27 23:41:06
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	4000
Lens Aperture	f/9.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	75.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: marie-7.jpg (73 KB, 675x900)

73 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX 645Z
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Tom_Marvel
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	118 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:29 22:16:09
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Focal Length	150.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: 27101169zi.jpg (299 KB, 1280x1280)

299 KB JPG

how can crops even compete

File: 2017-5-28 Jay Monique-4.jpg (94 KB, 812x900)

94 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX 645Z
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Photographer	Tom_Marvel
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:29 21:28:48
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	90.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: 645D8064.jpg (400 KB, 1200x900)

400 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX 645D
Camera Software	645D Ver 1.00
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:12 19:17:13
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6528
Image Height	4896
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: 64506712.jpg (187 KB, 1076x900)

187 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX 645Z
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Photographer	CHARLES_WOOD
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2019:01:31 20:52:47
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6912
Image Height	5184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto Bracket
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 2019-3-17 NaTonia-14.jpg (65 KB, 674x900)

65 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX 645Z
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2 (Windows)
Photographer	TOM_MARVEL
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	43 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2019:03:19 21:48:15
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/13.0
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>3825475
>https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/48-pentax-medium-format/87027-post-your-medium-format-photos.html


Man this stuff is bad.
The GFX Facebook group got some legit beautiful pictures taken with them, and also some horrible ones.

It seems like only shit photogs post on that pentax website

>>3825508
i cherry-picked the terribad ones to make a point but i am not entirely sure what the point is

>>3825508
the vegetable one makes me a little bit angry for some goddamned reason

>>3825508
https://www.behance.net/gallery/66738093/FINE-ART-PRINTS?tracking_source=search_projects_recommended

>>3825490
I unironically really like this one. Although I think it would be better-balanced if the model were like six inches to camera-right.

>>3825511
>i cherry-picked the terribad ones to make a point but i am not entirely sure what the point is

There's bound to be something decent but mostly ... yeah

>>3825515
>the vegetable one makes me a little bit angry for some goddamned reason

Too much cucumber and carrot, harsh lightning, background ... is noticeable, too boring.

File: 58752032-D9A8-47F8-875A-C(...).jpg (93 KB, 640x480)

93 KB JPG

>>3825387
>being able to shoot 4 formats on one camera is bad
Boy, those grapes are sour

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	640
Image Height	480

>>3825483
I hate this image so fucking much. What demon possessed you to think that anyone would want to see some ugly semi-nude crackhead dancing with black fabric?

>>3825549
Faygo obviously, anon is a juggalo.

File: B13308DA-3921-48BB-9987-D(...).jpg (355 KB, 960x1280)

355 KB JPG

>>3825549
Show us your studio work then

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	960
Image Height	1280

Commit a Holga

>>3825852
i wonder why some people find this type of portraits ugly, sure the background is completely defocussed and the girl looks like she was tacked on there since she is crisp as a cracker.

But i like it, looks nice, specially the no shadows bit.

>>3825852
outfuckingstanding. she's like a cuter mazzy star. 10/10 would fade into.

File: IMG_5698.jpg (595 KB, 1200x900)

595 KB JPG

>>3826199
f11, 1/400, fp4, godox ad400 on 1/2 +0.3, last shot on that roll, best from that day.

>>3826215
Holy fuck you are the one that shot it! Thought it was some old timey pic.

Is that the GX680? And how the fuck is that F/11 from that far away?

I'll 100% try this out when i get my MF camera in a couple of weeks, thanks for the second pic anon, got an Ig @?

File: 2020-09-28-0017.jpg (857 KB, 1486x2000)

857 KB JPG

>>3826231
>>3809691

and yes, it is. and 210mm. i focused to the front of her, so she was just slightly in the.. focus field (?) when closed. and protip: get the biggest octa you can get/afford/carry around. i dont even know where my beauty dish is right now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	8800F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.4.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:09:28 11:06:56
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3825062
shoot film you ridiculous cuck

>>3825852
>Show us your studio work then
No. Fuck you. It's not a requirement to show you my work in order for me to hate a picture of an ugly semi-nude crackhead dancing with black fabric.

>>3826215
Cargo shorts falling off your ass, graphic t-shirt, backwards hat, mangy-ass beard, cigarette, thrift store Nikes, black ankle socks... Bro, you're not a kid anymore. Get it together ffs.

>>3826299
why hate? not fashionable, but he is comfortable, don't hate on that, much better than a basketball short and a tank top.

>>3825852
>>3826241
Razorbumps you’re back!

>>3826301
he's got a nice conformist look going, but i think he needs to cower behind some sleeve tat and more piercings

>>3826241
>>3825852
i could have taken this on an iphone 6

>>3825070
>landscape photos
Literally any camera with wide and tele lenses will do

>>3826320
You'd need an iPhone 8 at a minimum to get a shallow depth of field effect.

>>3825166
Commercial photographers as in for fashion, products, and branding, you dumbdumb

>>3826215
>f11
Is this the power of MF?
That has way more toneh than my shitty MFT at f1.8

>>3825852
You missed focus why are you posting this?

>>3826430
lmao you are totally fucking insufferable

File: no-image-found-360x250.png.png (4 KB, 360x250)

4 KB PNG

>>3826430
Faggot

File: 6AFE29B5-EDDE-4468-92C8-B(...).jpg (482 KB, 1773x1773)

482 KB JPG

>>3826438
Oh shit my bad here you go

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	8800F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:10:25 17:27:45
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1773
Image Height	1773
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3826499
>Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Macintosh)
Of course you would use a Mac. You disgust me anon.

>>3826499
Face is out of focus, why are you posting this?

See, that's you.

File: 1598272260249.jpg (2.56 MB, 2000x3000)

2.56 MB JPG

>>3826504
>>3826509
>b-but /p/ told me youll be laught at if you dont have at least 5k in gear ;_;

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1200D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.4.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:08:22 02:59:25
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: uh.png (106 KB, 235x253)

106 KB PNG

>>3826531
jesus fucking christ dude

>>3826499
More craters on her ass than most asteroids.

>>3826535
This literally cost me my erection. I came here to help edging while looking at porn. Fuck you anon. Fuck you.

File: 1597400421399.jpg (1.45 MB, 1333x2000)

1.45 MB JPG

>>3826535
>>3826541
>>3826544
>nophotos

Don't worry, that was just a "digital polaroid" for my real work :^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Negative Lab Pro
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:08:14 02:05:08
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3826499
of course you're the ass pimple guy

>>3826567
i have no idea what ex-soviet republic these young ladies seeped out of, but i am very much not a fan of any single thing in these blighted photographs

>>3826568
https://www.instagram.com/kozapytapl/

Anytime someone posts a GX680 we should just direct them to this account lol.

>>3826567
>>3826531
>>3826499
I genuinely feel bad for these models. Like on a deep level.

File: D3BFF329-2CD2-485D-BABC-9(...).jpg (490 KB, 974x1280)

490 KB JPG

>>3826299
>imagine being so petty to analyze what some dude on the other side of the planet wears
Oh nophoto, some people don’t really care what others think. I’m happy with my “work”, with what i do, you’ll have to try a lot harder to get to me.

>>3826297
Well, you kinda have to. Someone did set up the lights, the background, got that fabric, the hopping crackhead. What did you do? Argued about charts on a nophoto forum. Don’t get me wrong, i don’t like it either, but i have something to show, “how it’s supposed to be done”.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	974
Image Height	1280

>>3826572
Also, rent free ;^)

>>3826608
she should lift her dress to avoid getting poop on it

>>3826576
just look the the photographer and it's easy to see why he can only shoot crackheads

>>3825387
salty Fuji hater

File: Example_of_The_Brenizer_Method.jpg (4.36 MB, 4271x4704)

4.36 MB JPG

>>3825482
>how can crops even compete

>>3825132

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1856
Image Height	2784
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	500 dpi
Vertical Resolution	500 dpi
Image Created	2012:10:18 10:34:26
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4271
Image Height	4704
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: A3A630CB-1799-4888-A29A-8(...).png (7 KB, 740x560)

7 KB PNG

>>3826631
Oh, so who do you shoot?

>>3826299
at least he has a job and leaves the house once in a while, unlike you

File: 2b9.jpg (7 KB, 200x148)

7 KB JPG

>>3826608
>some people don’t really care what others think.
You obviously do though. Instead of all that cope, just acknowledge that you need take better care of yourself and make some steps to change for the better.

>>3826608
>Well, you kinda have to.
No, I really don't.

File: 814EEF01-82D2-441B-ADBF-9(...).jpg (289 KB, 974x1280)

289 KB JPG

>>3826645
>chnage for better
Yes, sit here all day, argue about brands, post charts, start to rent my head for free at some point. “Better”. Or i can wear what’s comfortable for me, do what I want, what makes me feel good and not waste my time even thinking about what do i look like to some random nophoto on a mongolian basket weaving forum.

Really, your opinion has no value to me. It could have if you could post your photos, share your techniques, and we would discuss the photography based on the merits of a given work. There’s a thread where me and some anon talked about metering for night scenes, exchanged experiences, and we both got something out of the ordeal.
You, on the other hand...
>cargo shorts bad
>tshirt bad
>backwards cap bad

Can you see how i dont give a fuck?
And i know that this whole wall of text will bounce right off because I didn’t mention a single brand, didnt post 1600% crop of some niche sensor array, didn’t call anybody names.
But, if that makes you happy, i can always hide your threads.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	974
Image Height	1280

File: 941D7046-075A-499C-8309-B(...).jpg (315 KB, 1280x1280)

315 KB JPG

>>3826656
But, on the other hand, it’s really fucking nice to live rent free. Now I understand isi and his antics.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	1280

>>3826640
>cat's eye bokeh radomly in the middle of the frame

you could also use your shitware to superimpose a giant moon while you're at it

>>3826656
lol i have shot better pics on my iphone 5s

>>3826430
Your eyes, check 'em.

>>3826656
>>3826661
Great pics dude!
Fuck the haters.

File: 3A8DFF3B-7234-49A4-A84D-8(...).jpg (294 KB, 1280x918)

294 KB JPG

>>3826671
Again, show us.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	918

>>3826656
dunno who that cunt is and i find some of your pictures actively nauseating but i like your energy a lot and that other dude is literally a fucking teenager; i'd bet $10,000 in XMR on it. you be you my dude. all good.

>>3826640
The subject has to stay still while you take the 9-12 exposures, you can do it but breninzer sucks for portraits (a bit)

>>3825062
Why would anyone get the Hasselblad X1D over Fuji medium format?

Hell even the 645z seems like a worst ourchase

>>3826737
>Hasselblad X1D
ergos and shooting experience of the hasselblyat. same reason why peeps choose canon or nikon over snoy. the fuji may beat it on specs but the hassy is a joy to use.

>>3826432
>>3826438
>>3826673
you all fell for this weak bait, you should be ashamed

>>3826656
nophoto got TOLD.
I like it.

>>3826670
granted, the Tony balls are an issue

>>3826734
only has to sit still for the parts where they're in the frame desu

>>3826763
The 50R should be an experience too (opposite to the 50s and 100s).

Their specs are totally similar too.

File: 121.png (331 KB, 600x1081)

331 KB PNG

>>3826765

>>3826779
kek

>>3826737
The main one is leaf shutter.

>>3826656
Lol you're really upset aren't you? It's apparent you absolutely do give a fuck. And now every time you go out you're going to think about how pathetic you look haha! Talk about rent free!

>>3826656
>block of text
>can you see how I don’t give a fuck?

oh look it’s razorbumps guy raging in yet another thread

>>3826656
Don't let them bug you bro. Who cares if you dress and smell bad and you take extremely unflattering pictures of your visually uncomfortable models? Maybe that's what you want to portray in your images and these idiots just don't see that. Some people get off on seeing women uncomfortable and you're providing that service for them. Be proud of that!

File: 6C6B5B40-AA4D-486E-8CF4-4(...).jpg (766 KB, 1242x986)

766 KB JPG

>>3826942
I wonder how bad his bitch tits are?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Image Width	1242
Image Height	986

>>3826795
Isn't HSS just as good tho?

>>3826958
For digital it’s “just” as good because if it misses you’ll know. For film you need something more consistent.

>>3826958
Nah not really.
HSS is gonna eat 2 stops of light minimum, even more for the higher shutter speeds. Let’s say 3 stops at 1/1000.

That’s the difference between a typical 70wattsecond portable flash and a 200-300wattsecond strobe with powerpack, with whatever that means for portability, modifier mounts, etc etc. .
And that’s if you don’t care about depth of field. If you do, you need an ND as well.

It *is* possible to always get the same results as leaf shutter, if you give enough power on your strobes for “overpowering the sun” and an ND for DoF (which would require even more power). It’s just that in many times it’s not practical. A doubling of guide number means 4 times as powerful a flash, or 4 times as many flashes.
Imagine needing to stop down a further 2 stops to control ambient light, then you need 2 more stops of flash power. Now imagine you use a 2-stop ND to match the shallower DoF, requiring another 2 stops of flash power.
4 stops of power is a huge fucking lot, verging on the unfeasible. Think of it like that: if you wanted to match the result of a leaf shutter camera with a portable speed light at full power - in terms of flash vs ambient ratio and DoF - with a camera that has 2 stops slower sync speed, you’d need 16 of the same speed lights firing.

The saving grace is you usually don’t need full power so it’s usually more feasible, still not very practical though.

It would be pretty based if Fuji offered parallel versions of their lenses, with a leaf shutter, for a premium.
It seems they could do it if they wanted to, they have experience with leaf shutter (mechanical and electronic), both historically and also more recently.

>>3826942
>>3826944
lol you're still mad
he really rustled your butt

>>3826980
Thanks a lot for the thorough explanation, now I see why people pick the X1D over the GFX's

>>3826944
jesus christ you literal cunt what the fucking fuck
seriously

>>3826570 >>3826567 >>3826531 >>3826499 >>3826675
why are all of these photos so abject.

>>3826779
could of made a better meme on my iphone 1

>>3826986
That nophoto cope is delicious. Will have to share heads with isi.

>>3825193
Hasselblad oldfag here.

They shit the bed as far as I'm concerned with digital. Too expensive, not able to use old lenses.


Leaning 70/30 on a GFX 100s

>>3827184
Go for it, no adaptability sucks cock.

>>3825063
imagine being this wrong

DOF and the subject's relation to the space around them changes dramatically with sensor/film size

"Get a ladder out and take a fuckload of pictures" isn't a solution to that

>>3827432
>DOF and the subject's relation to the space around them changes dramatically with sensor/film size
For the same focal length/aperture, yes. But not for an equivalent focal length/aperture. Now if no equivalent lens is available and you want that look, you have to shoot that lens, whatever format it is in. But I'm not sure if there are any such unique lenses left in MF. The fastest glass is now in FF.

>>3827443
You could just adapt the fastest FF glass onto MF.

File: why bro.jpg (770 KB, 974x1280)

770 KB JPG

This is the most fun thread I've seen for quite a while :D

>>3826608
Why would you take this picture!?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:02:24 07:27:40
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	974
Image Height	1280

>>3826338
No. iPhone 7 Plus.

>>3826531
Oh god its you again.

>>3827581
kek

File: 13B9FB83-0EAB-4B01-B051-C(...).jpg (2.22 MB, 2334x3500)

2.22 MB JPG

>>3827471
I imagine you’d get horrendous vignetting

>>3825132
I do too many brenizer panos haha - my new r5 takes 45mp images and my old computer was having a hard enough time with the 20mp images I was stitching from the 6d... they look i credible taken with an 85 f1.2 so i can barely wait for the new rf 135 f1.4 to be released. I already love the standard shots i get with the old 135 f2 ef lens

>>3825142
Thought so.

>>3826499
You know... i like to try to avoid unnecessary touch ups... but i always end up doing SOMETHING. Whatever i happen to think the worst part is, i fix it. Datass needed a LOT of fixing. Wtf is up with the ass pimples??? And it wouldn’t have been hard at all - just a fuckton of spot removal
Well... at second glance, the face too :)

>>3826567
Like seriously... i really didn’t come here to pick on people’s work... but the legs here??? Did she trip and fall on some sharp rocks during the shoot? The shins are fucked

Also, don’t wanna be nophoto, so here’s one from last week. Chose this one since this is about medium format and this photo is a good example of just how ridiculously shallow the depth of field can be on ff.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Windows)
Photographer	Milan Ivanovic
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2021:02:22 15:57:29
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3827581
Because you didnt ;^)

>>3827589
>No. iPhone 7 Plus.
Oh, you're right.

Not the 6, though, that's my point.

>>3827603
>I imagine you’d get horrendous vignetting

To some extent, some lenses do not cover more than the 35mm sensor size, on others, it covers it all with minor or no vignetting.

Most sigma lenses cover the whole sensor.
Some canon L lenses also cover it.

>>3827603
I prefer the Russian junkies to this stronk blak predator.

>>3826608
>>3826614
Literally exactly what I thought. That's a shitting position if I ever saw one.

>>3828503
You're projecting, Ravi/Boris.

>>3828504
Literally who

File: IMG_20210225_194357.jpg (4.19 MB, 4000x3000)

4.19 MB JPG

OP, just jump on the Gfx100s like everyone else.

>>3828507
or he could jump to the 50s/r since they cheap now.

File: 7A364F99-2C3C-409B-81DF-9(...).jpg (3.17 MB, 2334x3500)

3.17 MB JPG

>>3827938
Hahaha fair enough.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Windows)
Photographer	Milan Ivanovic
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2021:02:22 15:58:00
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 46BD6DEC-49F1-40B6-A6E4-3(...).jpg (1.87 MB, 2001x3000)

1.87 MB JPG

>>3827938
But here, have a slav subject

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.4 (Windows)
Photographer	Milan Ivanovic
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2021:02:16 15:51:28
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3826992
Eastern Europe

File: 20210226_231542.jpg (799 KB, 1381x1246)

799 KB JPG

>>3825290
My nigga

>>3829597
vomit inducing

>>3829636
Explain

>>3829636
dont ever try even talking with poorfags here.

>>3829851
meant for
>>3829816

>>3825062
Serious response for a thread devolving into trolling

I got to bum a hassy X1D and the files it pumps out really are just stellar. That said I hate just about everything else about the camera. I normally run a 5Ds which is a comparable resolution but the color depth and tonality do not even come close to comparing to the X1D. I was pretty bummed out until I saw that the X1d has the highest rated sensor in the market.

Does this matter under most shooting circumstance? No. I would probably still go with the 5Ds because it's more fun to shoot and has a lens and accessory selection that better fits what I do.

I'm pretty ambivalent towards MF film. I played around some bronicas, mamiyas, and hassy film bodies and lenses and yeah they were nice but it was also kinda like whatever.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ztqk6uyrxhnbeao/b0008571.3fr?dl=0


Here's a file if you want to play around with it.

File: 20201105-B0008522_ps.jpg (849 KB, 1200x899)

849 KB JPG

>>3829902
and here's some photos for giggles

Also Lightroom is complete and utter fucking trash with these files when exporting them so make sure you're using ACR.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Hasselblad
Camera Model	Hasselblad X1D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.0 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Reagan D Pufall.com
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:05 18:29:08
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/6.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/6.8
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Subject Distance	Infinity
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	899
Unique Image ID	0000000000005551018CE66200002EA2

>>3829904
fuck me

File: 20201105-B0008537-1.jpg (1.38 MB, 1200x899)

1.38 MB JPG

>>3829904

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Hasselblad
Camera Model	Hasselblad X1D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.0 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Reagan D Pufall.com
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:05 19:02:15
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	Infinity
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	899
Unique Image ID	0000000000005551018CE66200002EB1

>>3829906
fuck me again

File: 20201201_B0008796.jpg (374 KB, 900x675)

374 KB JPG

Here's some dog photos with it because it's funny.

>>3829905
?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Hasselblad
Camera Model	Hasselblad X1D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.1 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Reagan D Pufall.com
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	71 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:12:24 17:17:03
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	90.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	675
Unique Image ID	0000000000005551018CE66200002FB4

File: 20201115-B0008715.jpg (436 KB, 900x675)

436 KB JPG

>>3829908

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Hasselblad
Camera Model	Hasselblad X1D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.0 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Reagan D Pufall.com
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:11:15 13:49:17
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	675
Unique Image ID	0000000000005551018CE66200002F63

>>3829908
grammatically an "ejaculation"; used here to express wonder

>>3829904
>>3829905
Great shots.

File: 863C56D1-2C87-4FB6-B275-0(...).jpg (963 KB, 1125x1500)

963 KB JPG

>>3829851
womp womp

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1125
Image Height	1500
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 20201105-B0008571.jpg (2.12 MB, 2000x2000)

2.12 MB JPG

>>3829902
>https://www.dropbox.com/s/ztqk6uyrxhnbeao/b0008571.3fr?dl=0
Thanks for sharing! Here's my test.

>>3829904
What a blast. Great camera and moment.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Hasselblad
Camera Model	Hasselblad X1D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.1.1 (Windows)
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:02:27 20:14:45
Exposure Time	1/6 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	-1.7 EV
Subject Distance	Infinity
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	0000000000005551018CE66200002ED3

>>3829975
And she's buying a stairway...

>>3829904
Really nice one.

>>3829933
what a poorfag

File: chinadoll.png (1.16 MB, 694x1047)

1.16 MB PNG

I'm a noob, why do medium format photos look so unique/different to aps-c or full frame? I can't tell why but they look more like real life. I see a MF photo and think "wow that looks nice". And then I look FF pictures and don't know if it's a shitty phone snap shot or made with the A7R or something.

Is it because the higher resolution that makes the image more crisp? Or because some render method?

Also the GFX 50R looks so good. But god damn they are expensive

>>3831011
>why do medium format photos look so unique/different to aps-c or full frame?
Because people don't generally start with medium format early in their photographic careers, so you usually only see medium format shots from photographers who've spent years and years getting better at photography.

Also the higher resolution, to a certain extent, but that's not as big a part of it.

As proof: Any time I personally post medium format shots here, people don't go "Wow, that looks amazing, medium format is so lifelike". They just say "Lol, snapshit, you suck".

>>3831019
Pls post one of your MF shots

>>3831019
This. It's the skill that makes photo good. I've shot with hasselblad H4D40 not too long ago, but had shitty light, short time to use it properly and ended up with shots that were actually worse than those I got from 6D with 24-70 2.8 lens lol.
Good photographers even in times when FF was morbidly expensive shot good photos. I know a commercial photographer that shoots for adverts he uses D850 and phase one xf system and I couldn't tell which shots were with phase one which with nikon. There is a difference yes, but it's up to photographer's skill to get most of it snapshits of cats won't improve much from having bigger sensor.

>>3831024
He doesn't have any

File: P201112-006.jpg (713 KB, 985x1000)

713 KB JPG

>>3831024
Here you go. Kodak Ektar in a Kiev 6c.

>>3831030
You've fallen into my cunning trap.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: 00002509_Lomo 800-000025090007.jpg (1.1 MB, 1000x816)

1.1 MB JPG

>>3831019
>They just say "Lol, snapshit, you suck".

>>3831048
>posts a photo of a rubix cube and face mask
Jeez I wonder why anon...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.3 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2021:03:02 02:28:04
Color Space Information	sRGB