Reposting my in progress 3D printed 6x12 panoramic camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-A515F
Camera Software	A515FXXU4CTJ3
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	25 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:01:13 04:56:33
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	320
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.60 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	B48LSMG00CM

File: 20210113_191951.jpg (1.29 MB, 3000x1939)

1.29 MB JPG

>>3797864

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SM-A515F
Camera Software	A515FXXU4CTJ3
Equipment Make	samsung
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	25 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Created	2021:01:13 19:19:51
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Focal Length	4.60 mm
Flash	No Flash
ISO Speed Rating	320
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	3000
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Image Width	4000
Exposure Mode	Auto
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	B48LSMG00CM

File: Snap (9).jpg (4.66 MB, 3368x2264)

4.66 MB JPG

>>3797865
Excellent. What's you plan for mounting a lens on that?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3368
Image Height	2264
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020.11.20 10:57:35
Image Width	3368
Image Height	2264

>>3797866
The design incorporates a m65 17mm-31mm focusing helical and different lens board/disc files for copal n.1-00 size shutters. The helical is coming from china so i have a lot of time to polish up the print with some sanding, matte painting the inside and adding felt for light seals.
Im gonna run it with a 90mm 6.8 Rodenstock Grandagon-N which i already purchased from Ebay.

>>3797898
More pics of it?

>>3797855
>still needs a hasselblad film back or something
>still gonna be a paperweight in 5-10 years when film is dead
I don't see the point

File: 1604368880021.png (3 KB, 297x300)

3 KB PNG

>>3797960
>in 5-10 years when film is dead

File: 20210114_031636.jpg (2.16 MB, 3000x2802)

2.16 MB JPG

>>3797948
Heres the backside

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SM-A515F
Camera Software	A515FXXU4CTJ3
Equipment Make	samsung
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	25 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Created	2021:01:14 03:16:36
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
Focal Length	4.60 mm
Flash	No Flash
ISO Speed Rating	250
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	3000
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Image Width	4000
Exposure Mode	Auto
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	B48LSMG00CM

File: 20210114_031651.jpg (2.19 MB, 3000x2760)

2.19 MB JPG

>>3797948
>>3798003
Film enclosure

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SM-A515F
Camera Software	A515FXXU4CTJ3
Equipment Make	samsung
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	25 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Image Orientation	Unknown
Image Created	2021:01:14 03:16:51
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
Focal Length	4.60 mm
Flash	No Flash
ISO Speed Rating	320
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	3000
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Image Width	4000
Exposure Mode	Auto
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	B48LSMG00CM

File: DSC_0151.jpg (287 KB, 1602x2000)

287 KB JPG

hp5+ or tri-x for portrait/fashion photography

I've used tri-x a bit because I like grittiness but something about hp5 tones are lovely

pic rel is tri-x

>>3797996
I mean unless you plan to shoot tri-x and fuji c200 for 15$ a roll for the rest of your days, it's going to be de facto dead in 5 to 10 years.

File: 1608590343497.jpg (175 KB, 1128x1098)

175 KB JPG

>>3797855
Just opened the back of my Pentax KM, Still had about 5 shots left on the reel, last photo I took on it was like a year ago. I feel like a retard.

>>3798009
>for portrait/fashion photography
iso 100

File: Screenshot_20210114-083524.png (2.83 MB, 2048x2029)

2.83 MB PNG

>>3798016
Sometimes that can work out.

File: 20210114_134918.jpg (223 KB, 1280x855)

223 KB JPG

Damn - I've been shooting alot with my A1 lately and I'm floored by how great it feels to use and how great the 50mm f/1.8 performs. The bokeh is creamy as hell. What a time to be alive.

File: HP5+200 (20)__.jpg (230 KB, 1000x663)

230 KB JPG

>>3798009
They're very similar in all aspects anon, and the small differences, say in contrast and whatnot, can be mostly compensated by developer + dev technique (times, agitation, etc.).
So I say get what's cheaper or most readily available. Or if you nailed down your times and technique based on either film, keep using that, not worth the effort figuring those out for the other.

As an anecdote, in most, common developers and "standard" times, I prefer the lower midtone contrast of HP5+ over TriX. Seems to give a straighter curve.

Also in the UK I used to get HP5+ for a fiver, and TriX was £8+ (before the hikes), so I used it almost exclusively and figured out the look I like: Perceptol 1+3, shot at ISO160-200, -15% dev compared to recommendation, normal agitation after the first couple minutes and then slow inversion every 3 minutes.
Absolutely nice, full tonality and could tame even very contrasty scenes.
Due to price and availability, I never bothered to use TriX extensively and adapt it to look exactly as I wanted it (as above with HP5+). But it can be done.
Lastly, TriX has a slight speed advantage in Diafine, like half a stop or a bit more.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	SilverFast 8.8.0 r18 (Dec 18 2019) 621e5df 18.12.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:11 01:47:23
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1400
Image Height	928

>>3798046
bruh that is near on autistic levels of dedication to development

I literally just use a one stop cinestill bw dev kit and develop as normal then make any tweaks in post/LR

>>3798046
>>3798054
Yeah dis shit is too much. I always just stand dev 100+1 rodinal. I dont give a fuck.

File: TriX200_ (8)__.jpg (261 KB, 666x1000)

261 KB JPG

>>3798054
>>3798056
Just trying to make a point lads.
TriX and HP5+ can be used interchangeably and everybody will be none the wiser without autistic side by side comparisons - if that.
The point is don't stress about it. They have virtually the same sensitivity, grain, response to developers, etc etc. . The only minor difference is HP5+ has a more straight curve while TriX a more S-curve given same development. That's all really.

>TL;DR: just use what's cheaper and more available, it doesn't matter.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	SilverFast 8.8.0 r16 (May 9 2019) 6e6d7cc 09.05.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3798009
How do you achieve such sharpness?????

>>3798081
I spy medium format if I'm not mistaken.

i just bought my first film camera, what do you guys use for general purpose colour photography?

is there any point in upgrading from an rb67?

i wish there was a 2.8 normal for the RB67, or the hasselblad 500cm was 6x7, or if there was some other mechanical only 6x7 camera with a 2.8 normal. that camera would be practically perfect

>>3798203
Why what are you trying to do?
A 6x7 SLR is barely a handholdable low-light camera, what would you need the f/2.8 so much for?

>>3798209
because there isn't one for his system and he's a gearfag

>>3798209
subject isolation.

also i dont mind carrying around the rb its fun to use lol.

dof simulator seems to indicate the difference between a 110 2.8 and a 127 3.5 is basically irrelevant so i guess i will make due https://dofsimulator.net/en/

>>3798210
unironically this

>>3798203
I do a shoot a week with my RZ don’t know why anyone thinks an electronic shutter is a bad thing.

>>3798212
>subject isolation.
So let me get this straight, have you actually shot what you have wide open and you found it lacking? I barely shoot the 80mm at f/2.8 unless I actually need the light. But otherwise it’s not worth risking missed focus or one eye in focus while the other or the nose isn’t.

Have you tried a portrait lens? Something like the 180mm f/4.5? A typical portrait lens in MF will usually give you more subject isolation than you can handle.
Aperture is not the only way, focal length plays an even bigger role.
If you wanna go insane with subject isolation, get a cheap pentacon six and a relatively cheap 180mm f/2.8 Sonnar.
But once you actually use it, you’ll find out the gimmick wears out fast and it’s not practical to shoot like that in most cases.

>>3798226
right now all i have is a 90 3.8 which i really really like but half-body shots have really cluttered backgrounds.

i find it very difficult to frame things from so far away but mb i just need to getgood

>>3798234
Then give the 180mm a try.
It's one of the cheapest lenses for the system iirc, something like $100 or so.
It'll take care of cluttered backgrounds just fine, both due to thinner DoF and the narrower field of view that cuts out lots of the "peripheral" background.
And you might like the perspective better too.

File: 1587520142189.jpg (436 KB, 1200x794)

436 KB JPG

>>3798244

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	SilverFast 8.8.0 r16 (May 9 2019) 6e6d7cc 09.05.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:04:22 03:35:45
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1200
Image Height	794

>>3798259
What film/ camera?
Also: Are you also using silverfast? I'm stuck on ver 6.6 that came with my plustek 7300.

>>3798234
Control your goddamn background instead of bitching. It's work.

>>3798259
Wanna buy a print bruv?
But gotta tell you, that's neither medium format nor 180mm.

>>3798202
What do you mean what do we use? Like camera? film? what?

>>3798015
As long as Hollywood filmmakers still shoot movies on film, they won't close down manufacturing for at least some film. They will need to maintain capacity to produce color film, in terms of manufacturing equipment and staff, so I expect they will continue to make some film basically forever, out to 30 years from now at least. It'll only get more expensive tho
>>3798202
kodak ultramax 400, proimage 100 when it's summer and not dark/overcast all the time

>>3797960
It uses Mamiya backs. Have a you

My first five rolls of film will be back from the lab next week, what's the common practice for dumping images? Would they go here because they're film, or should I just make my own "am I a talented photographer??" thread?

>>3798372
Make your own thread

>>3798015
There is still a market for technical film. Heck some dentists even still use X-ray film in 2021. So as long as demand for those is still there many manufactures may just continue to produce consumer film as it's using the same machines anyway.

>>3798202
Fujifilm c200, kodak colourplus, kodak ultramax, kodak portra 400

>>3798203
The Pentax 67 has a 105mm f2.4

>>3798445
>1/30 flash sync

lmao

>>3798462
sounds more like you have no money to buy one lmao

File: 5F01DA8D-921F-4B21-A8B5-B(...).jpg (787 KB, 1125x1500)

787 KB JPG

>>3798470
:^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1125
Image Height	1500
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3798473
nice rentals brah

>>3798477
cope harder :^)

>>3798479
renting shit to post flex on 4chin isn't healthy brah baka

>>3798480
>the rental cope

damn that’s sad, get your money up anon

>>3798473
Sub 500 dollar cameras? Alright.

File: DSC_0167.jpg (330 KB, 1508x2000)

330 KB JPG

>>3798081
rb67

>>3798091
das it

>>3798060
fair enough
I literally just use the cinestill df96 one stop developer for black and white

>>3798203
rb is lyf
I've shot at 1/15 with it before with no visible blur, just hold it against your body otherwise tripod

>>3798244
to add to this I used a 180mm for a while and it's reaaally good but limited, does 1 thing but it does that 1 thing very well
pic related, shot with the 180

>>3798462
matters not if you don't actually shoot in a studio

>>3798493
>the pretending to be unaware cope

sad

>>3798473
post receipt if not rental.

>>3798487
the pen67's 90mm 2.8 has leaf shutter for hss btw
but go on, show us another excuse for nomoney cope :^)

File: D3297076-AED9-406C-8D0C-A(...).jpg (394 KB, 844x1500)

394 KB JPG

>>3798507
this just kinda sad brah

>>3798523
he said 105 2.4 anon I know it’s hard trying to read that quickly when you’re poor and mad :^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	844
Image Height	1500
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3798541
wow u overpaid

>>3798542
just keep moving that goalpost anon you’ll find something that sticks (lol, not really)

>>3798545
im sorry i own a fuji i'm above you in every regard
i shoot digital analog and you cannot even dream of the sharpness of my film :))))

>>3798546
>i’m sorry

apologize to yourself for being a broke boy :^)

should i sell my rz and get a pentax

File: ErO-IcMXcAI0XDd.png (473 KB, 505x622)

473 KB PNG

>>3798548
I bouy cockrings with my government allowance you cant even fathom how horny

c amera shit
kill you're selve and sacirfice to фoтogod mr kent cockwell

>>3798551
sucks to suck :^)

File: film photographer peak bo(...).gif (2.03 MB, 925x975)

2.03 MB GIF

>>3798552
>>3798552
uuuhhhhhhhh wtf was you fukcin even doing lol post an photograpy

>>3798554
pookie I make deals in jeans and sneakers this is 2021 tech money :^)

File: Supertaunt.gif (37 KB, 300x300)

37 KB GIF

>>3798557
show jeabs ass :A) o wait ur flay like a brick XDDDDDD

File: img046.jpg (2.67 MB, 3375x2168)

2.67 MB JPG

I am going to dump a few. These are all from my Kodak Retina IF. I believe they are all Kodak Tri-X, maybe 1 or 2 are Arista Ultra. I believe all are 400 speed. Shot years ago and just recently developed

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3375
Image Height	2168
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

File: img115.jpg (3.56 MB, 2080x3328)

3.56 MB JPG

>>3798609

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.17134.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2080
Image Height	3328
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2021:01:07 17:54:10

File: img052.jpg (2.4 MB, 3416x2207)

2.4 MB JPG

>>3798609

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3416
Image Height	2207
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

File: img084.jpg (2.11 MB, 2168x3344)

2.11 MB JPG

>>3798609

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.17134.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2168
Image Height	3344
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2021:01:04 22:30:34

File: img112.jpg (3.42 MB, 3367x2135)

3.42 MB JPG

>>3798609

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3367
Image Height	2135
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

Also just got an Argus C3 for 12 bucks from a local thrift store and, after some slightly tedious tinkering with the rangefinder to get it calibrated, shot a roll of Bergger Pancro 400 with it to test it out. Excited to see how it turns out

>>3798610
>
3.6 meg photo of a STICK

Thanks for that valuable contribution

>bruh film will never die 4 ever bruh
>Next day Fuji 400h DEAD
Kek

>>3798622
Lmao

File: 1593684781571.jpg (4.57 MB, 3120x4160)

4.57 MB JPG

Recently got an old Ruski rangefinder from my Grandad, seems to work fine but there is mould on the shutter. It looks like there are no light leaks when looking through the shutter, would this be alright to shoot with it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3798645
yeah what lens do you have?

i'd say there's like a 60% chance something really weird is off with it, like the shutter speeds are way off, the curtains stick, the second curtain is released to soon, who knows.

it'll be awesome if the rangefinder patch is still bright enough to focus with and if the rangefinder is still calibrated (the calibration is an easy fix).

i would put a roll of superia or colorplus orwhatever cheap film you can find through it, not hope for anything and see how it comes out

File: 1597902578779.jpg (4.26 MB, 3736x2680)

4.26 MB JPG

>>3798646
It's a Jupiter 8 50mm f.2. I'm not sure about the calibration of the range finder, but the rangefinder patch still seems bright enough to focus with. And to my limited knowledge it does look like the curtain is works fine. My Grandad did take care of his cameras and he was pretty big into photography

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3797855
So how good are these things anyway? Been seeing them everywhere recently online and it looks pretty neat, but it's all just been people clapping at the idea of 3D printing a camera.

>>3798323
I accidentally the sentence, sorry. I meant film.
>>3798429
>>3798331
ty bros, I'll pick up some portra or ultramax 400 because I live under permanent clouds

>>3798624
https://kosmofoto.com/2020/01/eastman-kodaks-still-film-production-more-than-doubled-in-the-last-four-years/

umad

All I want is a dark room but I'm poor as fuck :(

>>3798738
I think someone on Emulsive or 35mmc just did a review on them. I might look into buying one

File: 800px-Visierlinie.jpg (34 KB, 800x785)

34 KB JPG

>>3798738
the thing i can never find a comprehensive answer for is the focus and framing mechanisms.

are there any that aren't janky or are they all cumbersome rigamaroll like
> the viewfinder is a plastic ironsight
> zone focus
> if you want to see through ground glass you have to switch the back out

>>3798768
And yet they keep increasing the price?

>>3798829
>have objectively the most popular color film in the space
>now have zero competition

hmm how should they price it brainiac?

>>3798829
Well they do say that there have been challenges in keeping up with increased demand. So maybe they're taking advantage of that and raising prices just because they can. Simple economics.

File: so confused.jpg (39 KB, 310x326)

39 KB JPG

Actual retard here, can someone explain overexposing vs pushing/pulling in development to me? If I'm shooting Ektar 100 and I rate everything at 65, how should I ask for it to be developed? Will it look good if it's developed at box speed still, or does some kind of compensation need to happen? I've been doggedly sticking to box speed for metering because I'm scared of getting this simple problem wrong

>>3798846
Overexposing means you shoot at 65 and you don’t tell your lab anything. This is what you want to do. No one pulls film anymore.

Anyone fuck around with Brownie box cameras or the like and respool 120 onto 620 spools? I got a Target Six-Twenty I wanted to try out and my smart ass thought "oh I have a camera that does both 120 and 620, I'll just run it through there a couple times, ez". It *seemed* to work but I think the loose end of the film not taped onto the backing paper caused some issues. Ended up having to retape the starting end and lost 2-3 frames.

For the future, should I just respool it by hand? Or is there a way I could make this work? I guess at the very least I could use the 120/620 camera to make winding a bit easier.

>>3798846
Overexposing means just that, giving more light than necessary to your exposure.
Similarly for underexposing.

Pushing means developing for longer. This is usually done in tandem with (and to compensate for) underexposing.
Pulling means developing for less time. Usually done in tandem with overexposing.
The confusion might be from the fact that many times people will say I "pushed X to Y" without mentioning the underxposure part which is usually implied. Then others will say "I pulled Z" and mean only the development part or only the overexposure part.
It's always better to be clear like "shot at X, devved at Y".

Pulling (i.e. overexposing *and* reducing development) colour negative film doesn't make much sense.
In B&W the effect of pulling is reducing contrast so you can capture a scene with high dynamic range without blown highlights or crushed shadows. As a secondary effect, you get less grain. The only sacrifice is speed, since you shoot at lower ISO when pulling.
In C-41 film, the main problem is colour casts when pulling (or pushing), and this is true for all colour processes. The 3+ layers that correspond to the primary colours and are calibrated with each other to give correct colour balance, don't behave identically under pushing or pulling, so the colour balance is affected. And it's not a simple, uniform colour cast, but it's different in highlights and shadows (also inbetween, but less noticeably so), which is a bitch to correct.
Now combine this major drawback with the fact that many C-41 films have wider dynamic range than B&W (primary point of pulling is to increase DR), so you see why pulling C-41 is a rare thing.

That said, you can overexpose a tad and be fine. It's a common thing to do, either to open up shadows a bit, or to be safe (from underexposure) if shooting at aperture priority with a not so sophisticated meter.

File: PSX_20210115_115822.jpg (342 KB, 1500x980)

342 KB JPG

Is $350 leafs too much for an eos 3?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Express (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:01:15 11:58:23
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3798910
Yes, 100 is more like it.

>>3798921
fuggg i will never find a good cheap eos

File: vivitar.jpg (143 KB, 1500x1200)

143 KB JPG

my olympus XA I enjoy using but it has bad fungus in the lens and the photos are affected especially in bright light.

I'd buy another but they are legit over 100 dollars in good working condition. Recommend me a good similar and capable point and shoot that hasn't been skyrocketed in value by hipsters yet?

>>3799074
Konica C35 is a neat little camera, no manual aperture but it is a rangefinder. (s2 and s3 variants are hipster'd but have a f1.8 aperture)

Yashica Electro 35 FC and CC is a rangefinder with aperture priority, however it uses weird batteries that might be difficult to find.

If you can forgo the rangefinder and go zone focusing, your options greatly increase with such bangers as the Konica C35 EF, Agfa Sensor Flash, Konica C35 EF3 and others I can't really think of now.

>>3798829
Production cannot meet up with demand. So they are increasing the cost to fund an expansion to their production facility.

>>3798879
Yeah, I brought a Kodak Bullseye on a recent trip to the mountains. They're fun cameras. A step up from Holga's in build quality and usability while still being kinda shitty point and shoots. You don't need to respool 620 to 120, you can simply take some toenail clippers and trim the edges of the 120 spool so it fits in the camera (look it up).
Here's my recommendation guy. The Kodak cameras are annoying because of their proprietary format. If you want to stick with the simpleness of a box camera pick up an Agfa B-2 for dirt cheap. If you want -slightly- more features a classic folder from certo6.com is cool.

>>3799089
Lmao imagine recommending a yashica 35 in the year 2021

>>3799124
lmao imagine shooting film in [current year]

>>3799110
I know of the clipper trick, and it works in some models, but not in mine nor most of the Brownies. The flanges of the 620 spool, in addition to being smaller in diameter, are also thicker, making the whole spool slightly longer than 120 so that it won't fit mechanisms without spring-loaded film holders -- like my Target 620. I would have to sand down the ends of the spool in addition, which is probably more trouble than it's worth and, I'd suspect, could easily end up damaging the film.

I'll keep my eye out for that Agfa but I like my Target. Very cool classic look, and I've heard it's the best Brownie model.

>>3798550
no, you should be happy with what you have, anon. why do you want to switch?

>>3799074
if you're in EU I'll sell you my XA for 80+shipping

File: 000071930019_18A.jpg (3.89 MB, 3130x2075)

3.89 MB JPG

>>3799074
Minolta Riva 115 Zoom - pic related was taken on mine

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3130
Image Height	2075

File: 1592491785572.jpg (166 KB, 1207x806)

166 KB JPG

im shooting hp5+ at 3200 because that's what i have fuck you which developer should i use if i want the shittest most high contrast grainey edgelord results?

File: 1592679341270.jpg (202 KB, 1000x689)

202 KB JPG

before i waste a bunch of film and do it anyways, im wondering what fomapan 100 would look like being pushed 5 stops to 3200? it looks like its a lot more common to push fomapan 400 and i haven't seen many samples of people pushing the 100.

>>3799206
Shit. I did it with Shanghai gp3 once years ago. It has good image quality funnily enough but there was backing paper marks on the film (but not on non pushed rolls). I’d say maybe try gp3 400 if you want a cheap faster film, foma is good at losing speed isn’t it.

>>3799199
Rodinal for the grain and some contrast. HC-110 or ilfotec hc or lc29 for the contrast and still grainy. In hc110 you should be able to increase the time a bit more for more contrast too, it should not shoulder as hard as other developers.

File: Ariana100_at_1600_003.jpg (714 KB, 1200x800)

714 KB JPG

>>3799206
This is Fomapan 100 pushed to 1600 and HC110 stand dev for two hours. I'm not sure I'd do it again. I think I'd max out pushing Foma 100 to 800 and not go much further than that.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>3799209
>foma is good at losing speed isn’t it
what do you mean by this? like it will just stop reacting to the developer after a certain point?
>I’d say maybe try gp3 400 if you want a cheap faster film
i'll keep an eye out for it, but i tend to buy whatever i can find though. i don't normally have much of a choice.

>>3799216
why not? this pic looks great

>>3799199
Caffenol

>>3798651
how is the viewfinder on this? i love ancient rangefinders but the tiny shitholes you have to look through really suck if you wear glasses. with my konica 1 i have to focus with my glasses on, and then remove them to get close enough to see the frame edges. taking the shot is a longer process than i feel like it could be

File: 1602548181366.jpg (1.29 MB, 2244x1500)

1.29 MB JPG

Ever wonder whether you should keep shooting film?

I don't find myself doing it as much as digital because I always either need a higher ISO than what's in my cameras or I don't feel like shooting B&W when I have color, or vice versa.

Then I feel like buying more cameras so I can shoot more types of film at once, but I don't know if that's logic or just me lusting after sexy old film cameras.

And part of me worries that it's unsustainable because I could buy a bunch of these cameras and films could just keep getting discontinued and then I've got things that are worthless. The future really is digital and you can get film-like results if you use bullshit like vsco presets.

But yeah, I dunno. What say you guys.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Capture One 20 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:06:04 18:09:50
Image Width	2244
Image Height	1500

>>3799240
holy shit dude you're blowing my mind right now

I have a Tri -X 400 that I purchased back in 2016/2017. It has been stored in its plastic cylinder, in a mason jar with a seal in my fridge at 2-3 C this whole time.

It will still produce good photos, right?

>>3798259
This person looks awfully familiar... upstate NY?

>>3799199
That your pic? Looks sick.

Just curious though, after pushing the film that far how much does the developer matter? If I were to do that and take it to a lab (dont know what chems and process they use) would the end result still be cool?

>>3799261
If you need more than iso 800 indoors, you need to turn on the light, my dude

>You can use VSCO and it's like film
Oh nvm you're an idiot

File: IMG_20210113_112727_727.jpg (1.34 MB, 2212x1600)

1.34 MB JPG

>>3799286
This is iso400 indoor, just a ceiling lamp and a candle on the table.

How can you constantly need higher iso than what you have in cam?

Forget the bullshit of digital shooting at 6400 or over, film behaves much better

>>3799274
Yes lol

I shot something like 10 years old that definitely was not stored in a fridge or anything and it gave me some of my favorite shots

>>3799241
Yeah it is quite small and the rangefinder patch is pretty dim. Haven't used it properly yet, and this is my first rangefinder, need to get a roll of film to try it out, I'll let you know how I get on when I try it.

>>3797855

Everything else being equal, which produces a picture of higher perceived acquity / sharpness at internet resolution, something around 8mpx, a regular 6x9 lens like fujis EBC coated lenses or a high end 35mm lens from Leica or contax? The answer seemed obvious but after shooting multiple formats for a while, I'm not so sure anymore. My 35mm shots with modern glass seem sharper than old tlr 6x6 frames, but I'm wondering if luxury glass really is that special.

>>3799194
This needs like +5 of magenta

>>3799306
If we are talking Instagram resolution aka 1080*1080, what people perceive as "quality" is separation, or "pop", which Leica lenses seem to excel at.
Are they worth 5000? No

>>3798202
>my first film camera
shoot literally anything try all the stuff

>>3797996
film is going to die when it's finally the year of linux desktop

>>3799284
>how much does the developer matter?
i dunno
>If I were to do that and take it to a lab
the lab i go to charges extra per stop you push. so if i wanted them to do anything fun or risky it would feel wasteful. maybe ill develop my film in vietnamese coffee after this other anon suggested it
>>3799261
>Then I feel like buying more cameras so I can shoot more types of film at once
i came to this same conclusion fairly quickly. luckily i enjoy film for its imperfections and old cameras (see konica, fed, zorki) are cheap

>>3799306
>Everything else being equal, which produces a picture of higher perceived acquity / sharpness at internet resolution, something around 8mpx, a regular 6x9 lens like fujis EBC coated lenses or a high end 35mm lens from Leica or contax?
There's no chance any 135 format lens, from Leica or Zeiss or whoever, is gonna match a "modern" (80's) medium format lens. It's not even close. Chasing resolution in 35mm with high end, expensive lenses is a fool's errand. Many times you can buy a whole medium format system just with the price difference between a "good" and "great" lens in 35mm.

When you resize a lot, this becomes less visible. At 8MP, realistically, 35mm is resized by a factor of 1.5-2x at most. Grain is still visible and most of the detail the film can give you is still there. Maybe you perceive that grain definition as acuity.
At 8MP, a medium format frame is resized 4-5x at least. Resolution is lost, and grain is not visible, making for a smoother look.

I suggest try different sharpening parameters or resizing algorithms for the MF frames, to get the look that you want. For instance a good MF scan, say at 3600dpi, and resized with Lanczos at 8MP is extremely sharp.

>>3797865
Would you share STEP files for this? Could remix it easier to use different lens mounts. Don't want to buy a helical mount from china.

Saw this set for sale, what its its approx worth? Mamiya 646 1000s with 35mm, 80mm and 150mm. Including a handle and a flash. Current bid is 650... looked up the lenses but I think total worth is at around 700. Am I correct?

File: 2B893255-2BF5-49B1-A561-8(...).jpg (235 KB, 613x827)

235 KB JPG

>>3799366
Forgot image

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Image Width	613
Image Height	827

>>3799240
>>3799265
reading more about developing with coffee and it sounds like this would probably suck balls at pushing the film more than a stop or so. my current edgelord routine is to push like 2-3 stops

>>3799372
What do you mean? I've never done it before but know it's possible.

>>3799375
im just googling with my fat here. a good developer will be more selective in cucking the exposed/unexposed crystals on the film. so a lot of chemical solutions can do this and result in some image, but a shitty one will be less selective about which parts of the image get cucked. increase development time in order to "push" the film to a higher iso, and you end up with an extremely thin negative. that's my googlefat understanding anyway

>>3799375
SO IN CONCLUSION results with coffee will vary more as you push it far past the films box speed

>>3799377
>>3799378
im trying to find example shots where caffenol was used to push the film like 3 stops. hp5+ 400 @ 3200 with actual developer is pretty dank

>>3799241
just get contacts lmao

>>3799274
I'd say you only really need to start worry about quality loss after like 15-20 years, and even then most of the time you can fuck around with exposure and development a bit and get fine results. Old expired film also certainly has a cool look to it.

>>3799366
You would be happier with a 645 pro/80 combo for the same price imho.

>>3799306
>higher perceived acquity / sharpness

whatever that means

>>3799380
I see I see, a guy In here (https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/pushing-with-caffenol-c.29800/) did 200, 400 and 800 in caffenol-c

>>3799392
those results are pretty impressive

>>3799228
Foma’s box speed is overrated compared to other films

>>3799395
Is it a problem with all their films or only the 400? I just shot some 200.

File: agfa-moviechr-red-2-1-120(...).jpg (267 KB, 1200x1131)

267 KB JPG

I've got two packs of this and a working super8 camera.

How can I develop this on my own? I'm guessing the color chems are long gone, but can I still do black and white?

>>3799397
I tried developing Kodachrome double 8 as black+white in caffenol once. Was a disaster.

It is possible to get results though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9v0uKLvr0Bc&ab_channel=ZeroBudgetFilmSchool

File: 20210116-_DSC5319.jpg (3.01 MB, 3737x4152)

3.01 MB JPG

Tried some still lives on film... not sure if I could print these as is, required some messing around in lightroom...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2021:01:16 14:45:20
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 20210116-_DSC5317.jpg (2.93 MB, 4511x3702)

2.93 MB JPG

>>3799406
Also this but this is boring comparatively

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	844
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2021:01:16 14:45:36
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

How important is the mirror damper in an SLR? does it affect anything but the sound? i thought about replacing the light seals on my SLRs but honestly I dont wanna fiddle around the ground glass and mirror if its not necesarry

>>3799391
Easiest way I can explain the difference is that you develop two rolls of bw film, one in a high acuity developer like rodinal and the other in a solvent developer like ilfosol. The "pop" is different.

>>3799414
It also reduces shake and vibration

>>3799460
but it doesnt affect the images directly, does it? like in form of light leaks or any weird casts or glows

File: Fomapan200_ (13).jpg (203 KB, 1000x651)

203 KB JPG

>I just shot some 200
The 200 is excellent and its box speed very accurate.
The 200 is what came out of Foma's attempt to make tabular grain film (like Tmax, Delta, etc.). They didn't quite succeed, but they didn't fail either; they got quite a high percentage of pure t-grains in the emulsion to call it a "proper" tabular grain film. But they didn't get a high percentage of some "inbetween" type of grains, in triangular and hexagonal shape.

Long story short it behaves kinda inbetween a traditional cubic grain film, and a t-grain film in most aspects.
For instance it takes longer to fix than traditional grain films, lust like most t-grain films do, but not as long as say Tmax. Also, usually traditional grain films get a speed increase in diafine, while t-grain ones a decrease, fomapan 200 stays right on the spot. And so on, you get the point.
It's very sharp and high resolving, officially at 110lp/mm (Tmax 100 is 120lp/mm, Tmax 200 is 100lp/mm). Grain is fine, finer than traditional cubic grain films, a bit coarser than pure t-grain films.
Speed is bang on and it's flexible, for pushing and pulling.

All in all really nice film, for a great price.
10/10, would recommend.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	SilverFast 8.8.0 r20 (May 5 2020) 863405b 05.05.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2020:05:26 20:50:51
Image Width	1000
Image Height	651

Meant to quote >>3799396

>>3799390
What are the advantages of a pro?

>>3799377
>googling with my fat
>cucking the exposed/unexposed crystals on the film
>which parts of the image get cucked
>googlefat
Can you fucking talking normally?

>>3799471
So all the different Foma films are actually different films and not just the same thing at different speeds? Didn't know that. Thanks for that info though, good to know

>>3799461
It could affect focus if the mirror falls too low

>>3799471
same his ass is cut off

>>3799518
>So all the different Foma films are actually different films and not just the same thing at different speeds?
Yeah of course, each one is a unique emulsion. The 100 and 400 are traditional grain films. Those are the ones whose speeds are a bit "optimistic".

>>3799286
>If you need more than iso 800 indoors, you need to turn on the light, my dude
My friends and family like it dark, I dunno why. It's always ISO 3200 conditions indoors. If you're shooting a still life like >>3799287 then it doesn't matter, but if you need your shutter to freeze motion of people, then it becomes a problem.
>Oh nvm you're an idiot
Yes I am.

>>3799336
I decided to do it. I bought another film body. That way I can have color and B&W at the same time and different ISOs. Fuck it, I'm going in.

>>3799572
>I dunno why. It's always ISO 3200 conditions indoors.
Usually, I think most normally-to-low lit indoors you can get by with ISO800 and f/2 at 1/30 or so. It would have to be deliberately dim to need more than that. Which might be the case as you're saying. Also 1/30 is the limit shooting people that are holding a pose for a second. 1/60 and above if they're moving around even a small amount.

>>3799414
I've read that if you let the mirror cushion just break down, little bits will come off and potentially get stuck on the mirror and/or find their way into other parts of the camera's internals and fuck shit up.

>>3799647
Old foams turn into this black powder when you touch them. That stuff does not wash off even from your fingers good luck with your focusing screen or internals.

File: IMG_20201206_095107~2.jpg (639 KB, 3364x2628)

639 KB JPG

There was an anon in one of the film threads about a month ago that said he was going to do a video on fixing hazed lenses. Anyone know if he did it? Does anyone know what can be done about it?
Picrel is second to last element from a SMC takumar 50/1.7 and it wasn't like that when I stored it and finally got around to fixing the ME Super it belonged on only to find the only prime lens I have for it unusable.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Nokia 7.2
Camera Software	00WW_2_270_SP06
Equipment Make	HMD Global
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3364
Image Height	2628
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2020:12:06 09:52:48
F-Number	f/1.8
Focal Length	4.71 mm
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
Flash	No Flash
ISO Speed Rating	100
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Program	Not Defined
Lens Aperture	f/1.9

File: 005.jpg (1.77 MB, 1501x1224)

1.77 MB JPG

RZ67 on portra

hello!

I wanna buy some Fomapan 100 since it's the cheapest black and white film I can get, and some chems do develop it at home. What chems should I get for it?

If I understood correctly, I need a developer, stopper and a fixer.

I'm mainly buying from fotoimpex, what can I get from there to develop it?

File: L9999460-1.jpg (199 KB, 2048x1363)

199 KB JPG

>>3799572
>>My friends and family like it dark, I dunno why. It's always ISO 3200 conditions indoors.
because your camera wants to make everything 18% grey.

But if the room is dark, let it be dark.
Let blacks be blacks and lights be lights, and you can use iso 800.

>>3799714
Nice, good texture on the cloth

>>3798829
>what is economics 101?

>>3799749
adonal (rodinal), mix it 1:100 and let it stand develop for an hour or two.
i use vinegar as stop bath, mix it 1:1 with plain water.
Ilford Rapid fixer, for fixer.
I wash the roll with dish soap to prevent streaking after fixing.
ezpz

>>3799714
excellent colors

hold me back from spending 200€ on ebay for a spotmeter or should i grab one ?
i have a little sekonic but doing landscapes it's kinda useless

>>3799920
thanks the key to portra is editing out the portra colors

>>3799206
>>3799216
foma 200 is easy pushable...just check massive dev chart

>>3799955
Just use an app on your phone with camera zoom function

>>3799965
isn't this a meme ?!?
i wouldn't care at all if i was shooting digitally..
i mainly like to go outside with a 6x6 or 4x5 inch and take landscapes.... i use the stupid sekonic few feet away from the camera but my main object is far away lol
do you really recommend a smartphone app for that ?

>>3799967
It’s just comfier using a dedicated meter but realistically the same result.

File: Ariana100_at_1600_002.jpg (573 KB, 800x1200)

573 KB JPG

>>3799229
Depending on the scene, some frames were quite thin. Ideal for high contrast scenes but not for full winter days. Another frame from the same roll.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>3800041
spooky

good comp

>>3800041
Looks great

for home developing
whenever I use photoflo at the end with 120 I get 0 water marks
whenever I do it with 35mm there's always water marks everywhere no matter what I do
any ideas?

File: img158.jpg (3.04 MB, 4522x2805)

3.04 MB JPG

What do you guys think of Bergger Pancro? Recently shot a roll of it, pic related. I like it quite a lot for the classic grainy look.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4522
Image Height	2805
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

Did anyone here use the NPC Forscher Proback II Polaroid-Back? Is it what I think it is? Can I shoot instant photography with it?

>>3799751
NZ?

File: apu.png (23 KB, 741x568)

23 KB PNG

if the door on my pentax mx is shut and there's no film in there, how do I open the rear door?

>>3799704
Tried leaving it in direct sunlight for a week?

>>3800238
You lift the roll winder up like on most cameras. The thingy you turn when rewinding the roll after shooting.

>>3800241
thanks man, I was scared of being too rough with it so I wasn't pulling enough, but it's supposed to be difficult by design

File: maxresdefault.jpg (132 KB, 1280x720)

132 KB JPG

So, he clearly posts here, right?

Is there a relatively compact medium format film camera that is also affordable?

The Mamiya 7 seems perfect but it is also extremely expensive.

>>3800309
I doubt it. He can be annoying sometimes with his 'im so bored and apathetic' persona but I like his vids. Also that IG user name is so fucking bad lmao

>>3800329
I'm impressed you can fuck that landwhale goblin of a gf, Jason

do you keep the lights on, or is that too much?

I should know better at this point, but how long does exposed film last before I can't develop it?

I shot a bunch of rolls in January/Feb/March of last year and then stuck them in the fridge and forgot about. Can I send them to the lab and they'll turn out fine?

>>3800331
How would it even make sense that I'd be him? more than half of that post is trashing him.

Regardless, is his gf fat? Ive never seen her before lol

File: raw0005.jpg (635 KB, 1600x2212)

635 KB JPG

>>3800339
I kept a (hp5) roll in a cam for 13 months and it turned out fine.

Keep in mind I'm in Rome so room temp is like 20-25 degrees.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 20 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1482
Image Height	2048

>>3800341
>more than half of that post is trashing him.
just like his channel ;-)

>>3800349
I was just replying to him.
I'm not the guy with the doubt.

>>3800349
>i suggest you go to a shop called Ars Imago, they ask for 4.5€ for a develop and they are passionate and helpful retailers.
I've been their client since like 2013

but recently Sabatini has cheaper film prices, which is telling

>>3800329
the apathetic/deadpan way he talks is honestly one of the few reasons i watch his videos. the other guy he sometimes shoots with is way too fucking hyper and i fucking hate it. he sounds like he's chilling and doing what he likes.

>>3800309
No I don't

Has snyome ever gotten fogged up film thst was scsnned during shipping? I've never heard of ig happening. Now that airports have the new scanners, I'm thinking of shipping the exposed rolls directly to my house when travelling.

>>3800325
GS645

i cant decide between getting the 60mm 2.8 afd or the 85 1.8 afd for my F4. i already own a 50 1.4 and a 90 2.8.

>>3800425
Trashcan tier

>>3800423
You can just ask them to hand check it. Put your rolls in a clear ziplock bag and hand it to one of the security agents at the scanner

can anyone explain to me why Kodak pro image 100 is so cheap? i can get a pack of 5 for 37 eurobucks which is almost half the price of ektar. form the scans i've seen online it doesnt look so bad. considering that my father decided to get back into film photography (by buying a leica R9, which i'm pretty stoked to try out with him) should i just buy a cuple propacks for us to play around with or is it just a shit emulsion?

>>3800450
I assume it's because 100 speed film is more difficult to shoot. You need good light.

File: Mbike-14.jpg (386 KB, 1000x667)

386 KB JPG

>>3799124
Yashica 35s are slept on, what are you talking about. The 50 1.7 is sharp as fuck, and only idiots dont realise that the battery problem can be mitigated by taping together 4 LR44s and turning a paper clip into a makeshift spring.

Its a tinny little RF for sure, but the picture quality is amazing

Stay in the dark fool.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 600D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2019:08:20 22:33:02
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Mbike-11.jpg (416 KB, 1000x667)

416 KB JPG

>>3800482
>inb4 muh Leica glass

even the pixel peeping faggots out there can't deny the Yashica

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 600D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2019:08:20 22:32:55
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3800482
>>3800484
Judging by these I’d say they’re appropriately valued.

File: _MG_5219.jpg (232 KB, 705x1000)

232 KB JPG

>>3800490
Here's a picture i took of your mother. Now you must admit as her darling son, she looks divine through this Yashica lens

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 600D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2021:01:19 09:30:18
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3800450
>can anyone explain to me why Kodak pro image 100 is so cheap?
it was marketed to latin countries which are poorer

then it was selling like hotcakes and they decided to start selling in Europe and the rest too, and didn't want to cannibalize that sweet sweet Ektar money from hipster paying 12 a roll, so they kept it cheap

How practical is it to travel with medium format cameras?

From everything I have heard/seen, the Mamiya RB67 seems gigantic.
Is it possible/practical to pack it in a suitcase and fly with it?

>>3800534
buy a rolleiflex, it doesnt occupy much more volume than a prosumer dslr with a non pancake lens on it

File: 1610196253784.jpg (641 KB, 1536x1920)

641 KB JPG

>>3800534
Some are smaller than others.

File: 1607287463768.jpg (216 KB, 1024x683)

216 KB JPG

>>3800534
>>3800541

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3800542
>>3800541
mogged

>>3800534
u can fly with the rb anon, just don't be a bitch

File: Unbenannt-24.jpg (1.65 MB, 1027x1500)

1.65 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7300
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2021:01:19 00:30:59
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3800541
>>3800542
You can get a folding medium format cam (like a Rolfix 1, which I got for like twenty bucks at an antique store) that'll fit in your pocket. Just make sure you check the shutter to make sure it still functions and verify the bellows are still light tight, because those tend to die with age if they're not maintained, and a lot of those are just set on a shelf to look pretty instead of being properly used.

>>3800240
No, I haven't tried anything except pulling it apart to see if it was oil film that I could clean. The haze is inside that cemented lens pair. Would leaving it in the sun do anything for the cement? I might give that a try.

>>3800103
good photo nice work do you want to have sex

>>3800493
based
>>3800482
>>3800484
i almost picked one of these up the other day, but im trying not to own too much photo gear. some of these cameras are an incredible value

>>3800493
yeah this looks like a $30 camera took it

File: port_street2_VM19XXW03457(...).jpg (48 KB, 500x500)

48 KB JPG

So I just watched the Vivian Maier documentary. Something that really stuck with me was how did she afford the cameras and all the film? Multiple rolleiflexes, a black Leica iii with probably a Leica lens? Umpteen thousands of rolls of film?! All while working as a nanny. Insane.

File: Kodak Gold 200-16.jpg (1.17 MB, 2429x3637)

1.17 MB JPG

Heya guys, gearfag question
I have a P30N that I shoot with, but im wanting some new lenses
a camera shop near my work has some second hand K mount lenses though I havent had a chance to look at them yet

are there any must have lenses in K mount, or any that stand out as really fun or interesting that I can keep an eye out for?

cheers, have this shot I took on a roadtrip in decemeber I dont hate

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 10.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2021:01:19 18:59:11
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3800762
anon most of people' earnings go towards rent/mortgage, taking care of children/parents, expensive furniture, electronics, clothes, etc
if you're without them, like maier was, then you can afford a lot of expensive gear

>>3800534
I'm travelling with my rb67 on Thursday along with tripod and filters

No room for clothes though

>>3800775
You're right of course. I guess I just couldn't fully appreciate how void her life was of anything else.

>>3800762
I assume by default that a successful artist is financially independent by some unrelated means.

>>3800437
Explain. The Fuji EBC lenses are top tier. You will not get better glass for cheaper.

>>3800442
I have multiple connections, I'm not going to go through that every time, nor do I have time for it.

>>3800791
>how void her life was of anything else.
spoken like a true normalfag.

There's a thing called priorities, and society does try to dictate them to people, but some individuals feel more free than others to set their own.

>Yashica Electro 35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xX0Z7Ogl-Q
This guy goes out and shoots what looks like a single roll of film and absolutely nails it. Crazy

>>3800833
>Crazy
what's crazy about it?

he's been shooting street on film for years
while I don't think his work has much artistic value, his technique and ability to notice has been honed for a long time

plus with sunny days and zone focusing you are basically pointing and shooting, so you just need to frame quickly.

>>3800768
if you want more shots like that just rip the saturation and pop sliders who cares what lens you used

>>3800832
>There's a thing called priorities, and society does try to dictate them to people, but some individuals feel more free than others to set their own.
El base. Some people rent big apartments with new appliances and buy new cars every 5 years. Some people buy film.

File: raw scan.jpg (583 KB, 1000x1497)

583 KB JPG

>>3800853
here's the scan I got from the lab, sorry for defiling the medium by daring to do some processing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand