Is there no digital photography cameras that try to actually emulate film like the Digital Bolex?
>>3761598Fuji does a shit job at it
>>3761602fuji is the best you'll ever get in 2020 mate.
Closest you're gonna get on a budget is a 7d with magiclantern recording raw video.I know the cameras are completely different but its the raw files you're after, with them you'll be able to grade the image much more than any 8bit funny video coming out if a modern mirrorless.If the raw workflow is too much hassle, then a fuji recording f-log and some funny lut's is the closest you're gonna get with little effort. Its not gonna convince anyone but it'll look very good.
>>3761622I'm not autistic enough to learn to color grade although I really wish I was
>>3761624If you want good video SOOC then a fuji is deffo what you want, you gotta grade digital bolex or any raw video for that matter for it to look anything other than gray porridge.
>>3761624>I want to film>I don't want to color grade, that's autismDo you have any health issues?
>>3761701Color grading is lots of math and learning complicated things
>>3761704Math? I'm a retard and I colour graded. I'm not very good at it and I find it really tedious. It's not so much about the math as it is about it being a technical skill that is quite boring to put to work
>>3761707I read that being serious about emulating film involves math but maybe that was just for something specific.
>>3761715The only serious thing here is how fucking retarded you are. Jesus Christ. Shut the fuck up
>>3761595>digital photography cameras that try to actually emulate filmYes, Sigma cameras with Foveon sensors.
>>3761717I am retarded my friend I will give you that but I have not said anything wrong
>>3761718Interesting. Any models specifically you think are worth checking out?
>>3761739Any Sigma Merill. They only resemble slide film, not colour negative / movie stock.
>>3761624Learn to colour grade, or get the Nik presets I think they’re free now, or just shoot film
I’m selling my digital bolex if you want it
if you just shoot raw, apply a saturation luminance curve, and apply some halation to the highlights you'll be 90% there
>>3763290also try not to blow out the highlights as much as possible bc film retains highlights well and you need to apply a curve to roll off your highlights like this
>>3761595If I wanted to emulate film I'd shoot film. But I actually like the "digital look" or more specifically, what I'm able to do with digital RAWs.
>>3763320Anyone here have experience with the Nikon Z6 raw video? How does it compare to the Sony or Canon cinema camera raw video?
>>3763320This. I won’t be the autist that rants about how digital can’t look like film but if you want that “look” for multiple projects would it really hurt to actually shoot it so little to nothing needs to be done in post?
>>3761595a red komodo and post processing. Komodo has global shutter like film cameras and enough data to push your video to any lookthis is BMPCC emulating 16mm and looks really close to it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZsoP5sxvXo
>>3763256how much and why are you selling it