Is this a good car? What are the pros and cons?
>>26670400It's a more performance-oriented MustangTuned engine, better suspension, major parts shared with GT350 and GT500It's a better than a regular GT but also significantly more expensive, it's up to you whether it's worth the extra cost
It has the GT350's Tremec transmission, so you know you'll never miss a shift or break it unlike the chink made MT-82
>>26670400I'd get it over a regular GT for the sole reason the 6 speed manual is the TR3160 from the GT350.
>>26670400it's a GT with a good gearbox, so yes it's a good car. only con is the price compared to a base GT, but if you were going to get an optioned up GT it's not that big of a jump.
>>26670400like all other say it's a parts bin special of the GT350, GT500 and Bullitt so all in all it's more track-prepped, it'll take a beating better than the regular mustang, while performance may be similar it'll surely last longer and not even talking about reliability. Things like brake fading will occur much later if at all, less stress on engine since it's got an oil cooler while the GT doesn't and a list of other "mods" which frankly, you could google yourself or, watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGKj5x_-cVc
>>26670400just get a used performance pack
>>26670400>mussy wussy without the chinese trannyLiteral god machine.
>>26670400The Mach 1 tries so hard to look menacing and aggressive, but it ends up resembling a grumpy bulldog trying to squeeze into skinny jeans. Its body lines desperately attempt to exude power, but the end result is more "awkward puberty" than "muscle car dominance." Sorry, Mach 1, but you can't flex what you don't have.Now, let's venture inside this supposedly high-performance chariot. Prepare for disappointment as you feast your eyes on a cabin that feels like it was designed by an intern on their first day. The materials scream "economy car" rather than "unleashed stallion." Don't be surprised if you spot a fuzzy dice or a "Baby on Board" sticker clinging onto the dashboard for dear life. With a Mach 1, you'll have to resort to using the exhilaration of your own imagination to distract from the lackluster reality.But the real punchline of the Mach 1 is its performance. It promises the speed of a cheetah on Red Bull, but it delivers more like a lethargic sloth on decaf. Sure, it has some horsepower under the hood, but it lacks the finesse and grace of a true sports car. It's like watching an enthusiastic toddler attempting a gymnastics routine after devouring an entire cake - clumsy, messy, and far from impressive. Don't even think about challenging a sports car on the track, unless your definition of a race involves a turtle with a sprained ankle
hold off until the raptor comes out
>>26670400>doesnt have the new 7.3its trash
>>26670400Why's the hood higher than the trunk kek? Looks retarded especially when the hood is stubby as fuck.
>>26671420i would rob six banks for this car
>>26670400It’s not a GT350 which is both good and bad. Doesn’t quite have the allure of the Shelby name, but does have some of the underpinnings without the Shelby tax. The bespoke 5.2 Voodoo is definitely more exotic than the 5.0, but is more temperamental and potentially less reliable. The gen 3 Coyote is an amazing mill that responds well to bolt ons and can run e85 out of the box with only a tune. You get a choice of auto or manual, the 10 speed is slick if autos are more your style. The Shelby will be more special and most likely the purist choice if you want to carve the canyons or track days, but the Mach 1 won’t be far behind and won’t break the bank quite like the GT350 will.
the shelby tax is such fucking bullshit. the Mach 1 is superior to the Bullit and the new Dark Horse. If money was no object, i'd already have a mach
>>26672067those fucking googobbling fags at ford need to put the 7.3 in a regular base model mustang without carbon fiber wheels
>>26670400i highly doubt that that car will reach Mach 1 in standard sea level conditions
