this car is literally ten years oldwhy can't I find any with a clean title for less than $3000
>>23618862that car came out in 2013 for the 2014MY
Get a 135i
>>23618862because people want them
>>23618970nobody should want them, they're expensive and slowthere's no reason the cars aren't at their parts value when they're this old
>>23618978Well if you're the fucking expert why aren't they 3k?
>>23618978well you obviously want one because you're looking for one.
>>23618862Why would a 10 year old car be $3k? Get a job retard.
>>23618872*came out in 2012 for the 2013 MYSource: bought this car new in 2013 and it's a 2013 MY.And they're expensive because they're awesome and dead reliable so people like me aren't selling them. Honestly, I'll probably just keep it until the wheels fall off or it becomes uneconomical to repair.
>>23618978>Nobody should want them!>Why can't I buy one!
>>23619027Because he thinks it's 1970.>>23618978>they're expensive and slow>they're expensive>they should be cheap because they're expensiveDo you listen to yourself?First of all, not even that expensive, anything cheaper is a total throwaway car.Second of all, they're not like finicky luxury cars, they don't age poorly with repairs that cost more than the car. They're 90's Civic reliable.Third of all, drift tax, track day bro tax, "looks like a supercar" tax, Toyota tax, I could go on.Fourth of all, the "le slow" meme can fuck right off. All of its competition just went upmarket and got completely unobtainable. Cars didn't get faster, they just started making more high-end models and stopped making good affordable ones. It's as fast as you really need for the street and you should have a dedicated track vehicle like a 2-stroke kart or a tube frame race car for track duty. The handling is still the best of any street legal vehicle I've driven.
>>23618978You want one you god damn retard
>>23619123>cars didn't get faster>It's as fast as you really need for the street >you should have a dedicated track vehicleIt's not slow but even it was other cars didn't get any faster but you should have a track car anyway, even though it's the best handling car I've ever driven>Do you listen to yourself?86 fags are on another level of cope
>>23618862Not even the 90s civics that you'd want are 3k anymore. There's no way a less than 10 year old sports car will be. >>23619123I wouldn't say civic reliable, because they did have issues with the 2013 models, but they're more reliable than pretty much every other rwd sports cars. This guy knows what he's talking about. OP is retarded
>>23618862because a brand new one was the exact same car until a few months ago
>>23618862sports cars are nichelow supply but high demand keeps prices up
>>23618862Weebs no wut they gawt
>>23618862You probably aren't going to find a 10 year old Civic for $3k... These are still several years away from being $3k shitboxes.
>>23618862>a clean title>"cars are investments" faggot
>americans consider 10yo cars old>meanwhile, in shitholes like mine, anyone with a car newer than 10yo is considered rich
maybe now that gen1 is ded theyll go down? i know i aint selling mine so good luck
why do you want one
>>23619123This is cope ascended
>>23618862>10 year old car>less than $3kCan someone find me ANY car with those constraintsPretty much even the worst running cars that are 10 years old are still like $5k
>>23621349Just learn how to use the filters on Craigslist
>>23621398>a BRZ/FR-S is somehow comparable to a base model Jetta with 120k miles
>>23621400>Can someone find me ANY car with those constraints>ANYDon’t start with me niggerAlso, maybe OP should get one of these instead if his budget is so small.
>>23621411I will start whatever I want because there’s nothing you can do to me
>>23621419You are a goalpost shifting faggot who has been proved wrong for the world to see
>>23621424Damn bro I’m utterly destroyed, might as well retire from le 4chinz, I had a good run
>>23621424And you're the kind of pleb who deletes posts over typos. You have to go back.
>>23621429Lol wrong image
>>23621427>>23621428This runt really thought you can’t find 10 year old running cars for less than 3k and now he’s seething about it
>>23621433checked but you still deleted your own post because of a typo, and that means you need to go back
>>23621398Based>>23621427It’s funny how you had to reply to prove you don’t care
>>23618862Actually, its pretty obvious that this car is itching a demand that is clearly there with this prices, isn't it obvious for companies should try to immitate this car, like nissan bring back in the silvia?If anyone knows any close rivals, then anyone know why they failed in comparison?
>>23618862I can find some going for 8000 to 9000 pound. In ireland though they are silly money, the same car could go for 25k ez. I would register it in the uk though because cheaper insurance.
>>23621432228i has a wider and stronger torque curve because turbos
>>23618978>nobody should want them, they're expensive and slow>I want one why can't I find one at a price I want to pay
>>23618862>>23618872>>23618978>>23618970>>23619123>>23619122>>23621398>>23621349>>23621341>>23621400>>23621424>>23621411>>23621432>>23621429>>23622342Token NPC fuckboy thinks that he can "look rich" for trying to find some beat to shit toyobaru, realizes that every other fuckboy is trying to do the same, hence the price. Perhaps the ultimate example of the quantum FRS idiot who says "these are shit they should only be worth 3k but as soon as I got one I'd pretend they were good/fast/anything". Fucking hilarious to watch.You ain't rich nigga, and you ain't going to beat a fucking civic even if you got a completely perfect and working FRS for $3K somehow
>what is supply and demandit would also be crazy if it depreciated that much.