/o/ redpill me on the modern Honda Accord
>>23224456It's your typical low horsepower, high torque comfy car wave come to expect from Marysville.It's nice, you wont be going fast, but it's just nice.
>>23224456its great if you get the 2.0L turbo one.Good luck finding a manual, they're rare af and they discontinued them.
>>23224510As they should. Its incredibly retarded to want a manual in a big cruiser like this
>>232244562.0 turbo with the manual if you can find it, the 10 speed auto is the fastest version though. Avoid the 1.5 with cvt.
>>23224514Not really dude they offered a manual on all the older accords on the higher engine trim. v6 accords are great and highly sought after.
>>23224518Yes because back then autos were shit, but these days an auto is better
Boring "sporty" family sedan. If you don't make much this would be luxury for you
The problem is people say "it's a cheaper, more luxurious, detunedType R!"Its not. It's an accord with a 2.0 turbo that shares very little with the drivetrain from the Type R.
>>23224583This, it doesn't have the cams, doesn't have the valves, doesn't have VTEC, doesn't have the transmission or differential.
>>23224585Dont give namefags (you's)
>>23224456New Honda's a shit to work on yourself. Be prepared to shell out big $$$ for dealership visits. GLI/GTI way better.
>>23225134Not even in the same class, if gonna shill for VW you could at least mentioned a passat considering that what the accord competes with
it's a sedanno reason to buy it over a current-gen charger, which at least has rwd
Literally did a cross country trip with it (1.5L) last week. Handling/suspension is nice, but it feels like cheap plastic luxury inside. I used to own a V6 8th gen Accord and prefer that one as opposed to the new one.