[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Malcolm X.jpg (171 KB, 898x500)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
LOS ANGELES – A California judge on Wednesday cleared the way for conservative talk radio host Larry Elder to join the field of candidates for an upcoming recall election aimed at removing Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom from office.

Elder scored a swift court victory in Sacramento, where he challenged a decision by state election officials to block him from the September recall ballot.

In a tweet, Elder wrote, “Victory! My next one will be on Sept. 14 at the ballot box.”

He added: “This isn’t just a victory for me, but a victory for the people of California. And not just those who favor the recall and support me, but all voters, including many who will come to know me.”

Superior Court Judge Laurie M. Earl disagreed with a state decision that Elder failed to meet requirements to run in the election.

Under a new requirement, candidates for California governor must publicly release tax returns for the five most recent years to qualify for the ballot. The rule was passed in an effort by Democrats to force then-President Donald Trump to release his tax returns during the 2020 election. A court struck down the presidential requirement but left it in place for gubernatorial candidates.

But the judge determined the rule didn't apply to recall elections and, even if it did, Elder substantially complied.

"I don’t find that Mr. Elder was required to file tax returns at all," the judge said.

The ruling amounted to a rebuke for Secretary of State Shirley Weber, who was appointed by Newsom in December.

The election, in the nation’s most populous state, will be a marquee contest with national implications, watched closely as a barometer of the public mood heading toward the 2022 elections, when a closely divided Congress again will be in play.


https://www.ksat.com/news/politics/2021/07/21/judge-radio-host-larry-elder-will-appear-on-recall-ballot/
>>
Elder's court win also will be celebrated by recall organizers who hoped for a large field of prominent candidates to attract voters. When Elder announced his candidacy, he immediately became one of the most recognized Republicans in the race, given his years on talk radio as well as appearances on Fox News and other media.

Elder announced his campaign July 12, but when a preliminary list of candidates was released last week, he wasn't on it. The state argued the tax information he submitted was incomplete, but Elder said he submitted all the required documents and was the target of political “shenanigans” by Democrats loyal to Newsom who didn’t want him on the ballot.

Meanwhile, virtually the entire field of candidates appears set. Forty-two other hopefuls have been cleared to appear on the recall ballot.

Other Republicans who qualified to run include reality TV personality and former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner; businessman John Cox, who was defeated by Newsom in 2018; state lawmaker Kevin Kiley; and former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer.

With the moderate Faulconer, conservatives like Elder and Cox and Libertarian Jeff Hewitt on the ballot, the field is “shaping up as one that will excite every kind of Republican,” said Thad Kousser, a political science professor at the University of California, San Diego. "There's someone for every part of the party.”

However, Democrats and independents “may just see a circus of internet influencers, radio personalities and politicians, and they might just say, ‘Forget about all of them — let's just stick with someone we know,’" Kousser added.

In another court fight Wednesday, Faulconer lost his bid to be listed on the ballot as the “retired San Diego mayor.” He held the job for six years and could not run again in 2020. Instead, he’ll be listed as “businessman/educator,” a backup title his campaign offered.
>>
His campaign accused California elections officials of trying to deceive voters.

“Voters have a right to transparent and accurate information about Mayor Faulconer’s record, and this defies common sense,” spokesman John Burke said.

In a second challenge over ballot language, content creator and candidate Kevin Paffrath lost his court fight to have his nickname “Meet Kevin” listed. Paffrath, a Democrat, argued the nickname is how he is known to most of his 1.7 million followers on YouTube, where he gives financial advice.

Voters in the election will be sent a ballot with two questions: Should Newsom be recalled? And who should replace him? If more than half of voters say “yes” to the first question, then whoever on the list of potential replacements gets the most votes is California's new governor. With numerous candidates and no clear front-runner, it’s possible that someone could win with less than 25% of the votes.

The push to oust the first-term, Democratic governor is largely rooted in frustration with school and business closures during the pandemic that upended daily life for millions of residents.
>>
literally who?
>>
>>894034
The man that will upset the California cartel
>>
>>894037
>the California cartel
literally who?
>>
>>894034
It tells you in the first sentence
>>
>>894055
literally who?
>>
>>894062
>conservative talk radio host Larry Elder
here you go anon, learn to read next time please
>>
>>894063
I'm also a conservative talk radio host.
>>
>>894064
Are you running for governor?
>>
>>894067
I don't think so. I might be. I'm not sure.
>>
>>894073
Better decide soon anon!
>>
CA gubernatorial recall is a testament to the hypocrisy of the democrat party
https://files.catbox.moe/yar23c.jpg
They also delayed it for over a year so that they could change recall law. I shit you not. And the new recall law follows their "rigged election" strategy we've seen out of them so much lately
>>
>>894172
Where do you people get this shit from?
>>
>>894177
Not CNN, fag.
They literally delayed over a year and used that time to change recall law in the state.
Verifiable.
One way they delayed is because they needed to "verify signatures" which anywhere else they cry racism and voter suppression
Your party is authoritarian
>>
Larry Elder Leads Gavin Newsom Recall Challengers By 10 Points in New Poll


https://www.newsweek.com/larry-elder-leads-gavin-newsom-recall-challengers-10-points-new-poll-1612250
>>
California Certifies 46 Candidates for Recall Ballot as New Poll Shows Newsom’s Support

The California Secretary of State’s Office has certified 46 candidates running for governor against Gov. Gavin Newsom during September’s recall election. The list includes five more candidates from the preliminary list released on Saturday, including conservative radio commentator and Republican candidate Larry Elder, who had been left off the list and successfully sued to be added back on.

“Victory!” Elder tweeted after the court ordered he be added to the list. “My next one will be on Sept. 14 at the ballot box.”

The recall election is scheduled for Sept. 14.

A new poll released Thursday indicates a tightening race is developing “with some big warning signs for the governor,” several news outlets report.

An Inside California Politics/Emerson College poll found that Californians are split when it comes to recalling Newsom, with 43% saying they support the recall and 48% saying they oppose it. The result is a marked change from polls conducted in May and in March, which indicated that those opposing the recall would soundly defeat those supporting it.

One warning sign, some analysts suggest, is Newsom’s 49% approval rating.

Another is the response voters gave to the question: “Regardless of the recall effort, would you vote to re-elect Gov. Newsom in 2022 or do you think it is time for someone new?” The majority, 58%, said they would vote for someone new, suggesting that if Newsom were to survive the recall election, he may not survive a challenger in 2022.

https://tennesseestar.com/2021/07/24/california-certifies-46-candidates-for-recall-ballot-as-new-poll-shows-newsoms-support-shrinking/
>>
Another warning sign is that more than 53% of voters said they were undecided about who should replace Newsom. The Public Policy Institute of California announced earlier this month that based on research it had done, it “did not see a growing interest in the news about the recall election during the spring.”

The challenger who received the most support among those polled was Elder, even after he was initially kept off of the ballot and while the poll was conducted. Elder received 16% support, with Republicans Kevin Faulconer and John Cox each receiving 6% support.

The poll also shows state Assemblyman Kevin Kiley’s campaign is on the rise. Within a week of launching, he rose to fourth place out of 46 candidates, only narrowly trailing candidates who have been in the race all year.

“Newsom’s desperation is palpable,” Kiley said, adding that the recall movement is about a new model of citizen-backed representation that puts “we the people” first.

While Newsom campaign ads hit the airwaves comparing the recall movement to events that took place at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, recall organizers say it has been “a groundswell movement of the people … Citizens from all walks of life, the entire political spectrum, every ethnicity, culture and race support this recall.”
>>
>>895040
>https://tennesseestar.com/
literally fake news made by a conservative PAC
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-tennessee-star/
>>
>>893871
Thanks op
>>
>>897757
You are welcome anon thanks for the bump!
>>
>>895114
>https://mediabiasfactcheck.com
>fakenews

i agree



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.