[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 48 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Happy 19th Birthday 4chan!




File: 1430182689585.png (167 KB, 608x402)
167 KB
167 KB PNG
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2022/sep/19/us-school-book-censorship-bans-pen-america

There is a “rapid acceleration” of book censorship occurring across the US, with more than 2,500 different book bans taking place over the past school year, a new report has found.

A total of 1,648 individual book titles, many of them that mention issues relating to race or sexuality, were the subject of bans by school districts in 32 states in the last school year, according to the new analysis.

More than 5,000 schools nationally have had books barred from access by students in libraries and classrooms, according to the report compiled by Pen America, a non-profit that supports freedom of expression in literature.

There has been a “proliferation of organized efforts to advocate for book removals”, the report states, from rightwing politicians in states such as Texas, Georgia and Wisconsin to at least 50 groups that have sprung up either in-person or on Facebook.
>>
Many of the books have been banned for simply featuring people who identify as LGBTQ+, with a third of all book bans from April to June including people with such identities, often under a spurious justification that the titles are “obscene”. Race and discussion of America’s racist past is also a target of book bans, with 40% of titles banned featuring prominent characters of color.

“While we think of book bans as the work of individual concerned citizens, our report demonstrates that today’s wave of bans represents a coordinated campaign to banish books being waged by sophisticated, ideological and well-resourced advocacy organizations,” said Suzanne Nossel, chief executive officer of Pen America.

“This censorious movement is turning our public schools into political battlegrounds, driving wedges within communities, forcing teachers and librarians from their jobs, and casting a chill over the spirit of open inquiry and intellectual freedom that underpin a flourishing democracy.”

While book bans have long been a part of America’s education fabric, the Pen report suggests they are now driven less by the complaints of individual parents and more by organized, ideological groups and overt pressure from politicians.

About 40% of the book bans in the past year have been connected to political pressure or legislation designed to restrict and reshape teaching, the report estimates. In November, for example, Henry McMaster, the Republican governor of South Carolina, demanded that the book Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe be removed from school libraries for being “sexually explicit” and “pornographic”.
>>
Kobabe’s book was the most banned book in the past school year, banished by 41 school districts, followed by All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M Johnson, banned in 29 districts, and Out of Darkness by Ashley Hope Pérez, prohibited in 24 districts. Among the most banned authors is Toni Morrison, the Nobel laureate. Texas led the way with book bans, followed by Florida and Pennsylvania.

The push to ban certain books has prompted backlash in some states. Shortly after the Texas state lawmaker Matt Krause called for the state’s school libraries to consider 850 books for possible removal, a group of librarians created a broad online campaign to fight the bans, deluging state politicians with tweets and emails over the issue.

In Wisconsin, meanwhile, a school district’s decision to ban the title When the Emperor Was Divine, a book by Julie Otsuka on the internment of Japanese-Americans in the second world war, provoked a furious response from local teachers, parents and students who organized protest rallies over the move. Such bans have continued unabated across the US, however.

“This rapidly accelerating movement has resulted in more and more students losing access to literature that equips them to meet the challenges and complexities of democratic citizenship,” said Jonathan Friedman, a lead author of the Pen report.

“The work of groups organizing and advocating to ban books in schools is especially harmful to students from historically marginalized backgrounds, who are forced to experience stories that validate their lives vanishing from classrooms and library shelves.”
___
>>
>banning Buckley Finn because it uses the word 'nigger' once
:-|
>Banning some memoirs about queer sex because it's sexually explicit
:-0
>>
>>1096147
who says the first?
Most liberals I know love Huck Finn, think it should be taught in schools, and while perhaps should not be taught until high school it certainly should not be censored. My very liberal school did read-alouds of it to confront the issue.
Where is the second?
The novels being pulled are not sexually explicit memoirs, but rather children's books that make even mention of the possibility of a gay couple existing.

but you knew this, no part of your comment is made in good faith. Protip btw, you would seem more credible if instead of vaguely handwaving towards
>le ebil sex books
you could actually cite an example of an overly graphic sex book pulled from an elementary school
of course, problem with that is you can't because there aren't any, and this whole scaremongering act is as fake as it is old and tired. How many decades have Republicans been pulling the same
>degenerates are corrupting our children with porn in schools!!!
routine that always turns out to mean
>i don't like that they teach something other than abstinence only sex education!!!!
>>
>>1096155
>who says the first?
Progressives
https://www.newsweek.com/kill-mockingbird-other-books-banned-california-schools-over-racism-concerns-1547241
>>
>>1096141
>If a book isn't included in the library then it has been """banned"""
When will this meme die? By this logic there are literally millions of books that are "banned"
>>
>>1096155
>The novels being pulled are not sexually explicit memoirs, but rather children's books that make even mention of the possibility of a gay couple existing.
Good. Leave straight people's children alone with your destructive lifestyle.
>>
>>1096141
Every time this thread about "banned books" comes up it reminds me of the time Levar Burton, star of Paramount's Star Trek, went on Paramount's Late Show with Stephen Colbert, and encouraged people to read books that failed to win government contracts he claimed were "banned" that were made by a publisher owned by Paramount they were trying to sell.
>>
>>1096160
>progressives are now liberals
and all republicans are nationalists and all socialists are communist and all fascists are nazis, alright yes very good we have firmly established words have no meaning.
goo gaa? sqgjnv fmkg ewij qhif fqi
>>
>>1096170
Reread the OP headline. It doesn't say "banned", it says "censored".
>>
>>1096141
Not sure why anyone would want a government institution sculpting the personal choices and identities of their child. Public schools should be strictly for conveying fundamental subjects of practical education.
>>
>>1096228
Same shit and same Jewish tactics.
>>
>>1096170
They're 'banned' because they were in the library, and then removed, aka banned.
Republicans love to do that.
>>
>>1096228
>Reread the OP headline. It doesn't say "banned", it says "censored".
They aren't even being censored. They failed to win a government contract. That is not censorship.
Why is this fucking meme being peddled by leftists? Because they'll do anything the big media corporations tell them to because they are literal retards.
All the media companies need to do is frame this as "immoral" to the godless fools and they'll start parroting the narrative.
Advertising has become liminal and anyone who believes this narrative is a part of it unwittingly.
>>
>>1096251
Says the side that's removing literature because it's "too white".
>>
>>1096228
it says both dumbass but since you're illiterate
>>If a book isn't included in the library then it has been """censored"""
When will this meme die? By this logic there are literally millions of books that are "censored"
>>1096251
>they were banned because the government added them to the library then then government reversed that decision.
First how is that different than if the government never added them to the library to begin with? Second does this mean that every time the library removes a book, that book has been "banned"? Does the library have the same books that it did 50 years ago? Are all those books "banned"?
>>
>>1096269
Look, I've been programmed by the media company that owns this news outlet to advocate for it's holdings. I can only do that if I use the mantras provided to me by their marketing team.
It's a ban because marketing says so.
I'm going to need you to stop preventing the shareholders from making money just because the books don't meet the standards set by boards of education and school policies across the country. Additionally it would help if we could play Pornhub ads during their computerized math homework.
So back off you book banning asshole.
>>
>>1096251
Degeneracy shouldn't be tolerated. You are trying to get to the point where you're showing blatant unironic sex in front of children and then try to call out censorship if it hurts you leftist pedophile puppet freaks and your agenda
>>
>>1096305
>we're gonna BAN this
>bans dont work they just empower those who avoid the ban!
and you fucks are power hungry enough to declare yourselves the only ones who can be trusted to make these choices

its like one of those homeless people screaming on the road that they are the emperor of america and we should bow down.
>>
>>1096308
>declare yourselves the only ones who can be trusted to make these choices
Wokeists really can't understand irony. Conservatives think that voters should decide. You're the ones who want teachers to make the decision on their own because you think voters can't be trusted to decide whether kids should be taught that all white people are evil
>>
>>1096310
>Conservatives think that voters should decide.
So put it to a vote than instead of harassing school board meetings.
>>
>>1096312
>he doesn't know how representative democracies work
People like you are what happens when wokeists control our schools
>>
Imagine unironically using a buzzword like "wokeist".
>>
>>1096321
imagine using buzzword unironically
>>
>>1096318
Why are you so scared of the most basic form of democracy? Is it because you know you'll lose those votes like you did in Kansas?
>>
>>1096312
The people control the school boards.
>>
>>1096326
>Why are you so scared of the most basic form of democracy?

So you're all for school vouchers, right? After all, they are my kids and it's my money so it ought to be my decision what kinda school they attend and what they're taught.
>>
How is not having a book in your library "censorship"?

If another cult like scientology started trying to sneak in scientology books into school libraries and people said "nah" would that be censorship too? Of course not. So what is the difference here?

>>1096321
>NOOO DON'T LABEL US
So what should we call you then, you are not random independent freethinkers, you are an organized group with very similar beliefs.
>>
>>1096387
>So you're all for school vouchers, right?
They prefer the cronyism of school teacher's union to vouchers and proper education. There's no government pensions that can be voted for if private schools flourish.
>>
>>1096388
Removing books that have been in the national curriculum for generations is a new phenomenon.
>>
Good I’m glad. I think I was worse off for reading anti white propaganda during my school days, and there’s no shame in banning groomer pedophilia homosexuality books . Kids are going to look at lists of banned books and say “yeah I totally agree with these book bannings”
>>
>>1096388
>So what should we call you then,
>we
>us
It's like you don't know you are a far right extremist. I don't care what you and the other 40 far right extremists on this board call 99.9% of the rest of america. Your opinion is irrelevant.
>>
>>1096403
according to Biden, half the country are far right extremists though

we're still waiting for somebody to explain how not including a book in the library is censorship and if so why aren't the millions of other books not included in the library considered "banned"?
>>
>>1096410
Biden has always known you people are 0.2% of society.
>waiting for somebody to explain how not including a book in the library is censorship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship
>Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".[2][3][4] Censorship can be conducted by governments,[5] private institutions and other controlling bodies.
>>
>>1096410
He condemned far right extremists in the conservative idealism. Are you an extremist? If not, he was not talking about you. Did you feel like he was talking about you when he mentioned and condemned right wing extremism? Then you might want to check your beliefs.
>>
>>1096446
>Are you an extremist?
Everyone right of Dick Cheney is an extremist to you people
>>
>>1096450
>I'm an extremist but I'm afraid to reveal my power level in public
Got you.
>>
>>1096450
Dick Cheney is an extremist already, so yeah.
>>
>>1096452
>>1096453
>calls other extremists
>thinks it's okay to put kids on puberty blockers (see: castration drugs)
This is why no one listens to you people
>>
>>1096454
>obsessed with trannies
>has no self awareness
Yep you're one of them.
>>
>>1096456
>pissbaby troon faggot spotted
Yep you're on of them
>>
>>1096403
Imagine thinking normal people want to read about groomer gays and blacks.
>>
>>1096464
>my worst twitter strawman represents everyone to the left of Steve Bannon
Who is supposed to believe this shit?
>>
>>1096466
That’s all the books being banned, groomer gays and blacks. No kid would look at a banned book list and say “oh wow gosh golly I really want to read about gays and blacks”
>>
>>1096476

Even if you weren't wrong, is that what we should teach in school now? Only the things that kids think they want to know about?
>>
>>1096504
We should teach them to beat people like you to death, unironically.
>>
>>1096516
What is it that makes you think even 100 people in the country share your radical extremist viewpoint?
>>
>>1096519
The fact that we're heading towards a time of civil war because you fuckers are so nuts.
>>
>>1096528
Before the internet you people would be ranting about the end times with signs written on cardboard boxes at street corners.
>>
>>1096504
There’s lots of things we don’t teach kids about because there isn’t enough time. Why is trans gay blacks more important than everything else we aren’t currently teaching?
>>
>>1096516
You glow in the dark
>>
>>1096540
You are paranoid and you need meds.
>>
>>1096539

Who is this trans gay black person who was in a banned history book?
>>
>>1096544
Trans persons gay persons and black persons my dude
>>
>>1096541
>>FBI Handbook
>>Advocate pointless illegal activity to entrap autists
>>If someone calls you out on it reply:
>You are paranoid and you need meds.
>>
>>1096545

Ah, I see. So you're not arguing that it was okay for a specific person to be excluded from history books, you're just creating a fictional person and hoping people will agree with you. A fictional straw man, if you will.

Do those sorts of arguments often go well for you?
>>
>>1096544
Michelle Obama.
>>
>>1096550
You're really still unironically repeating that meme?
>>
>>1096539
But we're not even talking about books removed from the curriculum. The article in the OP's post talks about books removed from the library - books students could check out and read on their own time.
>>
>>1096551
It's funny because she looks like a man.
>>
>>1096412
>The government not actively promoting material means that it is censored
okay so you also believe that the literally millions of other books not included in the library are "censored"? No because you're a dishonest shill who keeps refusing to address that point because you know you don't have an answer.
>>1096446
>Are you an extremist?
I think it's wrong for the government to teach children to hate white people, I think police should be allowed to defend themselves when a criminal tries to murder them, and I think Rittenhouse should be allowed to defend himself when "Peaceful Protesters" tried to murder him.
According to the left that makes me an extremist though.
>>
>>1096504
>Only the things that kids think they want to know about?
No, we should be teaching what the voters want to teach because we are a democracy no matter how much leftists hate that. I know you prefer your authoritarian society where the government gets to brainwash children against the will of the voters and behind the parents' backs but Republicans still believe in democracy so tough shit.
>>
>>1096653
Not even voters, but parents since they're the primary parties interested in actual education.
Whereas the groomers are only interested so they can groom.
>>
>>1096393
>There's no government pensions that can be voted for if private schools flourish.

Damn near everybody used to get a pension and that this isn't the case anymore, is a failing of our society.
>>
>>1096394
>Removing books that have been in the national curriculum for generations is a new phenomenon.

So is brainwashing kindergartners into shooting up female hormones.
>>
>>1096412

Sorry, but the Left-Dems are the standard bearers for censorship, this isn't debatable.
>>
>>1096709
every time I see this line, the hyperbole advances one degree
started off being
>look im not a transphobe, I just question why we're encouraging this in easily influenced high schoolers, they should at least wait til they're 18
and then rapidly devolved to
>they are brainwashing kindergartners into shooting up female hormones!
I expect soon it will be
>they are sending subliminals into pregnant women's wombs through advertising to convince the fetus it is trans or else to self-abort
>>
>>1096504
>Even if you weren't wrong, is that what we should teach in school now?

Schools should be teaching what the PARENTS what, beyond a core curriculum of read'n, write'n and 'rithmetic.
>>
>>1096715

You have to be 18 to get a fucking tattoo but we're to believe that kindergartners (and even younger!) are somehow making an "informed" choice about transitioning into a tranny?

Like vegan cats, we all know who is making the decision...
>>
>>1096718
Reminder: Youngest gender reassignment surgery recipient: 17.
>>
>>1096720
>source: anon's ass
still too young even if that were true
>>
>>1096722
>lalalalala
You're losing this debate...
>>
>>1096718
can you provide me a source on kindergartners (and even younger!) being given female sex hormones?
Or male ones, for that matter? Everyone seems to forgets FtMs exist, even though there's actually more of them than MtFs...
probably because they blend in better, a balding ripped manlet just comes across as a roider, while a 6 foot tall woman with broad shoulders is much harder to rationalize

anyway, as I said, this seems to be hyperbole. Every time I hear the line, the age gets younger and what is being done to those increasingly young kids gets worse and worse. It's like the world's least fun game of telephone
>>
>>1096666
idk. I'm not a parent but I am a taxpayer so if my money pays for schools I still want my vote to count. What happens in school affects us all. Even if you don't personally have kids being raised to hate all white people, it won't be pretty when a generation raised to hate white people grows up. That's actually how the Chinese Cultural Revolution happened. They first brainwashed a generation of children in schools with Marxism, and then when those children grew up they murdered anybody who opposed Marxism.
>>
>>1096737
>can you provide me a source on kindergartners (and even younger!) being given female sex hormones?
There isn't one yet, thankfully. Keep working on this insanity and there might be one.
12 is the youngest can of this particular type of munchausen by proxy I can find, which is still not OK.
>>
No books should be banned. God knows kids should read more
>>
>>1096727
blocked for disinformation
>>
>>1096747
Buy my book on Amazon.
It's called dead liberal scum.
>>
>>1096321
>>1096321
You are woke. You think your thoughts are your own when you are a slave to conformity. It is a gift of comedy from the leftists who are slaves to their own mentally ill minds
>>
>>1096760
You don't know what the word 'woke' means.
>>
>>1096745
wait....
then why did anon claim that kindergartners were being given cross sex hormones?
Is anon a lying liar who lies?
>>
>>1096780
You see this is how it works, we say, for instance, "you want to give kindergarteners sex change hormones", then you deny you want this hypothetical, and somehow 20 years later we're giving sex change hormones to children.
It's a tired act and it isn't fooling anyone anymore.
>>
>>1096549
Not sure what you mean. “I have two mommies” and “To kill a mocking bird” both need to be banned
>>
>>1096556
Banning from the curriculum is one step, banning from the school library is the second step, and eventually we hope to ban it from the town entirely
>>
>>1096556
There are literally millions of books that are not included in the library. Why aren't you complaining about them being censored?
>>
>>1096801
Libs are only concerned with the ones that help them secretly discuss sex with elementary schoolers for some reason.
>>
>>1096782
>you need to believe me because... it's a slippery slope!
yes yes, and women shouldn't be allowed to vote, Irish shouldn't be considered white, the landed gentry should get prima nocta, and Africans shouldn't be considered human, I get it
>>
>>1096829
Well that's just your stupid opinion
>>
>>1096831
It's called the "Slippery Slope FALLACY" for a reason, retard.
>>
>>1096782
>somehow 20 years later we're giving sex change hormones to children.
>>1096829
>slippery slope
No slippery slope.
It's happening now
The future is now
https://www.seattlechildrens.org/clinics/plastic-surgery/surgical-gender-affirmation-program/
>>
>>1096835
So you're saying they aren't giving sex change hormones to kids?
>>
>>1096842
Whether there are or aren't it doesn't mean you should ban books about it.
>>
>>1096851
I would never ban any book
Fuck censorship
>>
>>1096835
>It's called the "Slippery Slope FALLACY" for a reason, retard.
It's not a fallacy because it's been proven.
>>
>>1096388
>don't label us
Not that anon, but "wokeist" is just another label the right uses to discredit and attack the left without even having to form an argument. Anything they don't like is cultural Marxism, or wokeism. Of course, because they define those terms, they can call anything they want wokeist, and it gets totally written off as part of some radical ideology. Using buzzwords to scare people is exactly why people are chimping out at school board meetings. It works
>>
>>1096651
>teaching history is teaching kids to hate white people if the teacher shows them bad things being done by white people
Maybe get over it. It happened, and needs to be taught so that it isn't repeated. Whitewashed history isn't history. It's a lie
>police should be able to defend themselves
Absolutely. They should also be less trigger happy, and held accountable far more often than they currently are when someone loses their life for no reason. You understand that someone reaching for their license and registration can, and has, scared police officers enough for them to mag dump an unarmed civilian? Should they just get away with it?
>Rittenhouse should be able to defend himself
Yes. The dumbest hill to die on, and yet liberals do it all the time. It's fucking embarassing
>>
>>1097335
Same with “CRT” conservative leaders have even admitted this strategy. Convince people that “CRT” is any discussion of race in any way then attack those conversations about race as “racist.”
>>
>>1097336
I will concede that rotten house may have been technically defending himself because he got lucky in that situation and how it played out.

Now you concede that he was a kid with an assault weapon and little training who brought it to a dangerous and volition situation with the hope of being able to justifiably use that weapon on another human who he considered evil and in the wrong.

He got lucky to get exactly what he wanted.
>>
>>1097337
Yup. Exactly. The same way people write others off as sjws, feminazis, rednecks, etc
>>
>>1097338
Lol did not mean to put “rotten house” that was autocorrect.
>>
>>1097338
Rittenhouse was a kid who wanted to play COD: But in Real Life, or at LARP a little. That being said, he definitely had a right to defend himself, and the man who died as a result deserved it
>>
>>1097341
*at least
>>
>>1097338
>assault weapon
Debunked nonsense terminology ;)
>>
>>1097337
>Convince people that “CRT” is any discussion of race in any way then attack those conversations about race as “racist.”

Because those "conversations" are in fact blatantly racist, as the only discussion allowed is that White people are to blame for all the world's ills.
>>
>>1097410
It sounds like you get your information about what CRT is exclusively from far-right cesspools.
>>
>>1097411
except what that anon said is 100% accurate
>>
>>1097411

As “blame Whitey!” is the foundation of CRT, how can one have a “conversation” on the issue?
>>
>>1097411
>DeFiNe CrT!!!!!11111
Fuck off faggot.
>>
>>1097416
>>1097415
>>1097414
coping bot
>>
We need to go farther and censor 4chan
Purge this place and free everyone here
Anyone ITT who disagrees is a shill
>>
>>1097424
>We
Who is this supposed to be?
>>
>>1097427
Every last sane adult who isn't a shill like yourself
>doing it for free for a site that's destroyed your life irreparably
See you in the headlines
>>
>>1097428
found the self-hating and projecting shill
>>
>>1096851
Nobody is banning books. You and the other leftists fell for fake news. Ironically leftists want to ban disinformation.
>>1097336
>Teaching kids that all white people are the devil is just "teaching history"
Fuck off you dishonest racist
>You understand that someone reaching for their license
Jacob Blake was reaching for a knife and Michael Brown was reaching for the officer's gun.
>>
>>1096653
>No, we should be teaching what the voters want to teach because we are a democracy no matter how much leftists hate that.
Interesting, I've only ever heard conservatives defend voter suppression and the electoral college with talking points like "we're a republic, not a democracy".
>>
>>1097453
>Nobody is banning books.
>removes another book from library out of moral outrage
"Censoring" then, not "banning".
>>
>>1097454
Interesting, you switched the topic because you hate admitting that you want an authoritarian government to brainwash children to hate white men.
BTW a republic is a form of democracy dumbass. Maybe if your social studies teacher spent more time on actual lessons and less time ranting about the evils of white men you would know that.
>>
>>1097457
>muh white persecution fantasy
Imagine becoming this indoctrinated.
>>
>>1097456
>NOOOOOOOO if a library doesn't include literally every single book ever written that means it's censorship!!!
Odd that you never complain about the other literal millions of books that the library doesn't include.
>>
>>1097457
>Interesting, you switched the topic
I'm not whoever you were talking to before, faggot, I just saw you say something dumb and pointed it out.
>BTW a republic is a form of democracy dumbass.
Wrong.
Republicanism is not a form of democracy though they do usually go hand in hand. Having a government made up of representives does not necessarily mean that those officials are elected by the people they represent. You would know this if republicans weren't braindead.
>>
>>1097458
>if I call it a fantasy I can pretend it's not happening!
You want the government to force children to learn that white people are the Devil and you want the government to do it even if voters vote against it.
>>
>>1097463
You have seen too many fictional Tucker Carlson monologues.
>>
>>1097468
Which one of us is indoctrinated again?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/school-districts-whiteness-contract-book
>At least 25 public schools, districts pushing kids' book featuring 'Whiteness' contract with devil: report
There's a reason wokeists don't last long on 4chan. The longer you stay here the more you'll learn that your side lied to you about. Just wait until you see a thread on whether feminism is really about equality!
>>
>>1097470
You.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Americans
>>
>>1097470
>Fox News
>Christopher Rufo
You've been brainwashed, anon. The media sources that you accept as reality make money convincing you to be angry about things that don't exist.
>>
>>1097473
But you're wrong and it does exist.
>>
>>1097472
I think the bot is broken. Call your handlers to fix you.
>>1097473
lol I'll bet you think that was an isolated case too don't you?
https://nypost.com/2022/05/07/kids-book-our-skin-in-nyc-schools-blames-racism-on-whites/
https://www.foxnews.com/media/virginia-school-labeling-military-kids-privileged-bingo-disabled-veteran
https://www.foxnews.com/us/brandeis-kate-slater-white-people-racist-whiteness
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/minnesotas-teachers-union-is-normalizing-racial-discrimination

You've been proven wrong. You can ignore it for now and cry about how I'm "brainwashed" but if you continue lurking on 4chan you will keep getting proven wrong again and again and again, which is why there aren't any woke people who last on 4chan. Either you quit or you realize that wokeness is a lie.
>>
>>1097473
>It's not a real book!
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/not-my-idea-anastasia-higginbotham/1128275818

although I admit "Anastasia Higginbotham" sounds like a fake name
>>
>>1097487
White people are not under attack in America. You have been misled.
>>
>>1097489
No one is making students read the book, but nice kneejerking. Do you want Annastasia Higginbotham to be censored too?
>>
>>1097493
But you're wrong and they are.
>>
>>1097487
>lol I'll bet you think that was an isolated case too don't you?
Here's a quick breakdown of how incapable your biased brain is of interpreting information outside of your narrative. I did a quick browse of your first link. The book does seem to have some pretty cringe takes on race, I'll give you that. Three paragraphs down I found this quote,

>"The tome is on a suggested reading list parents can access through the website TeachingBooks. "

So, it isn't even a book being taught to children. Its a book on a reading list on a website for parents - meaning that if you don't want your kid to read the book you don't have to go to the website and read it to them.

This is the dishonest motte and bailey that you people always do. You claim white people are under attack and kids are being taught in schools that white people are evil and when I investigate your claim it turns out that there's one cringey book on a suggested reading list for parents that isn't even accessible to kids in the school. Your claims are weak and nebulous, that's why you have to try so hard to lie about and misrepresent them. Try reading the links you provide, anon. You might learn something about your own opinion.
>>
>>1097493
Wrong. But please spend more time on 4chan so you can be proven wrong again and again and again. You will soon learn why your comrades either leave or get converted.
>>1097495
>No one is making students read the book
Correct, because they are too young to read so the teacher reads it too them. BTW the book is endorsed by the School Library Journal and the publisher actually brags that the book is being taught in schools so is that a valid enough source?
>>
>>1097500
>Correct, because they are too young to read so the teacher reads it too them
Why bother lying when we can just read the links YOU provided and see you aren't telling the truth? How is it you're so incredibly opinionated about a topic you haven't even bothered to remotely inform yourself on? Do you not even read your sources or do you just read a headline that feels good intuitively and you link it on impulse?
>>
>>1097495
>No one is making students read the book, but nice kneejerking.
Then you have nothing to advocate for here.
Bye.
>>
>>1097503
>advocate for
I'm not the activist here. That's you, book banner.
>>
>>1097505
I haven't banned a single book.
Also here's a complete list of all the books that are currently banned in the US:
>>
>>1097503
I think the advocacy here is against conservatives lying about shit
>>
>>1097513
>complete list of all the books that are currently banned in the US
Here is the actual list
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/classics
>>
>>1097517
It seems I can legally obtain all of these books from Amazon. I didn't know Amazon dealt in black market literature.
>>
>>1097520
>I'm retarded and don't know the difference between borrowing in a library and purchasing on amazon
Hello retard.
>>
>>1097521
>I'm retarded and don't know the difference between something being excluded and something being banned
Hello fellow retard.
>>
>>1097524
It's like when you pretend tranny book readings at libraries are involuntary activities.
>>
>>1097525
You know, throughout history, trannies an libraries went together like peanut butter and jelly. Some might even say they're like peas and carrots.
Trannies at the library makes perfect sense in that respect. Wait, none of that is true.
Also they're drag queens funded by a massive NGO.
None of it makes any sense until you realize the goal is to normalize weirdoes by attacking children.
>>
>>1097525
>I'm losing.
>Quit change the subject
La Mao
>>
>>1097410
>those conversations are blatantly racist
So, history is racist? You're not honestly thinking white people have done no wrong throughout history, right? Slavery, segregation and Jim crow laws, red lining, etc. Whites have obviously done some cool shit, but no one is perfect, and that includes white people
>>1097453
>teaching kids that all white people are the devil
See above, dumbass
>Jacob Blake and Michael Brown
You think picking two fucking cherries is going to wash away all the unarmed black people police have killed for no reason?
>>
>>1097530
>You think picking two fucking cherries is going to wash away all the unarmed black people police have killed for no reason?
No one cares about blacks unless it's an election year and they're paid to do so. Also those particular blacks were killed with reason despite the incessant, and debunked mantras you repeat.
>>
>>1097529
What kind of contest do you think this is?
>>
>>1097532
It's an Internet pissing contest and you forgot to drink water.
>>
>>1097521
>Literally every single book that's not included in the school library has been banned and censored
this is like the 10th time somebody ITT has pointed out how stupid your argument is and you still ignore it. You lost.
>>1097501
you already got cited the links for the book and the fact that the School Library Journal endorses the book along with other lefty educators.
>How is it you're so incredibly opinionated about a topic you haven't even bothered to remotely inform yourself on?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

holy shit imagine being woke and saying that unironically! You know NOTHING about anything you support, you're a pure cult follower who blindly hates white males because you were told to.
>>
>>1097540
>misuses the word woke
>thinks he won some unknown long running argument
>denies books are being censored
>deflects to personal attacks
/pol/ isn't sending their best schizos
>>
>>1097543
>Literally every single book that's not included in the school library has been banned and censored
this is like the 11th time somebody ITT has pointed out how stupid your argument is and you still ignore it. You lost.
>>
>>1097487
>I bet you think that's just an isolated incident, huh?
>let me show you FOUR WHOLE TIMES where I was proven right by unbiased fox News and the new york post
I didn't know this board had ylyl threads
>>
>>1097545
>>Literally every single book that's not included in the school library has been banned and censored
You know everyone can see how wrong you are by reading the op, right?
>>
>>1097531
>no one cares about blacks until it's an election year
Anon, does it shock you that people talk politics more often when it's more relevant to them?
>2 blacks
Among a fuck ton of others. Try harder, dipshit
>>
>>1097548
this is like the 12th time somebody ITT has pointed out how stupid your argument is and you still ignore it. You lost.
>>
>>1097550
>ur stupid and you lost
You keep saying this apparently unaware that you were proven wrong in the op.
>>
>>1097548
No, please explain
>I can't explain because I made it up
thought so
>>1097546
>It only happened 4 times!
lurk more newfag and see previous posts about why only newfags are woke. Nobody stays on 4chan for a few years and still thinks there are only 4 examples and after you see enough videos and direct quotes from leftists you stop questioning the source.
>>
>>1097550
How many of those have been replies from you?
>>
>>1097554
It's okay I'm happy to spoonfeeds retards.
>A total of 1,648 individual book titles, many of them that mention issues relating to race or sexuality, were the subject of bans by school districts in 32 states in the last school year, according to the new analysis.

>More than 5,000 schools nationally have had books barred from access by students in libraries and classrooms, according to the report compiled by Pen America, a non-profit that supports freedom of expression in literature.
>>
>>1097552
this is like the 13th time somebody ITT has pointed out how stupid your argument is and you still ignore it. You lost.
>>
>>1097557
>if I keep smearing shit on the walls someone will believe the walls were always brown
No.
>>
>>1097554
>after you lurk moar in the echo chamber, and see all the cherry picked "evidence" you will no longer be "woke"
You need to touch grass. Terminally online young people will be the death of us, I swear
>>
>>1097552
>>1097548
I love how you still haven't refuted the argument
>but muh OP
the OP says that books are banned but it turns out they just aren't included in the library. Just like millions of other books
>>1097556
>bans
they define "ban" as "the government didn't include them in the library" which applies to literally millions of books.
You lost and I won't keep being baited by you until you explain why the government not including books in the library is a ban but the government not including other books in the library is somehow not a ban.
>>
>>1097560
You need to eat shit.
>>
>>1097560
>echo chamber
lol what sort of r*ddit newfag are you that you think 4chan censors opposing viewpoints? You're allowed to try and you're allowed to get BTFO when you do just like you are ITT where you claim that books are being "banned" yet the only evidence of "banning" is that the government doesn't put them in libraries just like millions of other books
>>1097555
by now close to half since the last 3-4 were me.
>>
>>1097564
Wonderful argument. Also, eat my ass
>>
>>1097560
>4chan is an echochamber
lol
>>
>>1097561
The difference is the books that were removed were in the curriculum for generations. They've suddenly been banned from the curriculum.
>>
>>1097561
>If I declare victory over the foxnews-invented strawman I previously injected into the conversation then it means the issue will go away
It doesn't work like that.
>>
>>1097565
>Anyone I disagree with is from reddit
Been here for a while, and I know it's been a cesspool of right wing propaganda for a long time. The fact that this is considered leftypol says a lot. Fact is, you saying I should browse 4chan more to get a better grasp on reality is fucking sad. Live a little, and spend some time in the real world
>>
>>1097571
>right wing
If you think 4chan and even /pol is generally conservative, you're a newfag and need to lurk more or your political compass is fucked.
You'll be more comfy back at reddit you gay negro.
>>
>>1097571
>I've been on 4chan a while but I also think that 4chan censors opposing political views and also I can't think of any examples of anti-white racism
lol
>>1097569
I love how you still haven't refuted the argument
>but muh OP
the OP says that books are banned but it turns out they just aren't included in the library. Just like millions of other books
>>1097556
>bans
they define "ban" as "the government didn't include them in the library" which applies to literally millions of books.
You lost and I won't keep being baited by you until you explain why the government not including books in the library is a ban but the government not including other books in the library is somehow not a ban.
>>
>>1097582
They weren't simply "omitted" from the library. They were specifically banned from the curriculum, despite being part of said for generations. All part of the culture war trying to undo every bit of progress the nation has made towards actually fulfilling the promises of its founding principles.
>>
>>1097587
>They were specifically banned from the curriculum,
So?
>despite being part of said for generations.
Shame what happened to typewriting class. Can't believe they banned it.
>All part of the culture war trying to undo every bit of progress
Oh and I thought the culture war was just supposed to be silly and meaningless. You are in fact trying to influence culture from the top down and claiming that's some sort of progress.
This is why we call you groomers.
>the nation has made towards actually fulfilling the promises of its founding principles.
We're farther away than ever.
>>
>>1097582
>implying I ever said 4chan censors anyone
4chan will let you post whatever you want as long as it isn't blatantly illegal. What I'm saying is that it's a cesspool of right wing propaganda
>>
>>1097577
>>>/tv/174543585
>>
>>1097608
And so would the rest of the Internet if it wasn't heavily moderated by trannies.
>>
>>1096143
>>1096147
>Literally banning knowledge
Sounds like the Vatican huh?
>>
>>1097650
>Sounds like the Vatican huh?
What?
>>
>>1097608
So it's not actually an echo chamber. It's a place that values debate and where people are free to share information and argue their position. Funny how places like that always end up against wokeness while the only places wokeness survives are places that constantly censor arguments and have to hide information
>>
>>1097690
>(4chan is) a place that values debate and where people are free to share information and argue their position
Not him but it's a horrible troll farm where oneupmanship and memes are more valuable than debate or facts. Also, parts of it are an echo chamber.
>>
>>1097694
So go back to r*ddit with all the other homosexual negroes, Captain Superhero.
>>
>>1097792
You should go back to bed. You sound cranky
>>
>>1097694
>it's a horrible troll farm where oneupmanship and memes are more valuable than debate or facts
Sounds like someone got proven wrong and then got meme'd on

Sorry faggot, no down voting here

>Also, parts of it are an echo chamber.
Compared to the king of echo chambers, r*ddit? Thats rich lmao
>>
>>1097880
>sounds like someone got memed on
You just proved his point
>we're less of an echo chamber than reddit
Maybe. Still an echo chamber. Also, reddit spacing
>>
>>1097650
america is nazi germany, book burning and restriction and control of information by the ruling elites. pretty hilarious they still think they're remotely a country of freedom.
>>
>>1098208
>america is nazi germany
Lord, I wish this was true. Nazi Germany was a an amazing turn around and excelled in almost every area compared to Weimar Germany.
We are Wiemar Germany. We are worse.
>>
>>1098208
No, read the thread idiot nobody is actually banning books as has been repeatedly pointed out ITT and nobody has refuted. You fell for actual fake news
>>
>>1098249
>THIS IS NOT HAPPENING THIS IS NOT HAPPENING FAKE NEWS FAKE NEWS
Typical republican denialism.
>>
>>1098296
>I am not a man. I am really a for real woman.
Typical Democrat tranny.
>>
>>1098307
>obsessed with trannies
What made you like this?
>>
>>1098308
You incel trannies overruning the Internet.
>>
>>1098313
Don't you think you're overreacting a bit?
>>
>>1098314
Not really.
>>
We ban books like the Bible ,How to make homemade wine for preteens and drug and bom make and no one says a word But the LGBT community gets banned fore spreading an unhealthy life styal spread std and shooting it's members life's buy 10 years. The perverts by the old definition, before gambling became gaming and pissing away your family futer was acceptable fun get upset .
>>
>>1098428
Who in the fuck is going to check out The Bible from a high school library?
>>
>>1098429
The Bible is the number one seller in the world and the world most stolen book world wide Thair are more Bibles in the US than dildos .
>>
>>1098430
>Thair are more Bibles in the US than dildos .
Wtf are Christians doing with all those Bibles? Perverts
>>
>>1098429
A kid who wants to read it, who else?
>>
>>1098555
Wouldn't he rather do that in church?
>>
>>1098565
Yes. The Bible is for church and The Guide to a Gay Man's Butt is for school.
No wait...
We need to get LGBT religious texts out of schools.
>>
>>1098506
Funny I have the king James new king James original king James version the NIV the Oxford edition the living study Bible 2 Catholic bibles the koran and when my rv door fell a part o rebuild it with about 10 Bibles it's a holy door
Now. So yes if bible.are pervert in the top 10 percent I have atlest 20 not counting the ones on the door. And copies of the Mormon Bible but I don't count them. Now wate dos your question have to do with the censorship. Why do Christian have so many copies many of them have sentimental value as gifts thair are about 40 different versions .
>>
>>1098570
I grew up with porn I hade a 50 gallon drum in my room by the age of 15 mostly I collected them and celebrety panties seal and autographed you don't care after a short time it's just another magazine why censor s picture of a brest then glorify wars or picket a library holding a cigarette. People should mind thair hown business.
>>
>>1098585
>Defends LGBT
>Grew up with a 50 gallon drum of porn
Every time.
>>
>>1098590
No my point was if we ban things we do not like nothing is left guns freedom abortion rights the Bible Christmas all gone because one percent of the population may be offended Is This the world we want to live in.I defend the LGBT like I defend drinking and smoking do that shit at home. If we burn books today sities will burn tomorrow history shows this over and over again .So no I'm not saying the LGBT community is a good thing but freedom is more important.
>>
>>1098249
So if the school will not buy them and it's not because of the cost or the book or it's size. What do call a book baning.
>>
>>1097531
>>1097531
Do you pay more fore a cup of coffee or sit on the back of the bus because white people spit on you. White people are the new black were the ones being abused and it's not just black people it's our government passing laws and trying to white guilt us becous 10 of the population hade slaves 100 years ago. And yes thay we're slaves before the arrived in America people forget That we're prisoners crimes and often just plain scum
>>
>>1098597
Correct but there's nothing being banned here so you have no point. This entire banned book movement is about publishers butthurt their zoomer inspired low information trash can't get fedbux from schools.
And you certainly didn't get your 50 gallon drum of porn from the school library.
>>
>>1098601
And slaves were majority owned by jews. White people wanted to free the slaves.
>>
>>1098601
What about the Hispanic population It's black killing Black not The white man and Black cops killing black brothers your race is ding the day of the half breed is here the muts are hear .Thair is no excuse fore blaming stupidity on skin color . Get an education get a job I'm not talking Walmart and you will get the respect you deserve.
>>
>>1098619
Jews how were thay can't remember any the Jews were not part of the golden triangle That's gold rum or brandy gold slaved you traided one fore the other. The Jews believe in the tora and peace not slavery. That were pusies the neo Nazi rounded them up like defenceless children Head fore the slaughter. The handy caped and the old,
>>
>>1098625
What?
https://www.bbc.com/pidgin
>>
>>1098609
Correct I stayed out of jail got a education at incredibly odds porn was not a problem fore me like watching a war movie did not make me a murders.my problem is we ban other people sins and ignore our problems my problem was drinking alcohol I read books on beautiful places and wine making from the library and at school and made at my home at next to my porn It took many years to become an alcoholic and I came within an inch of death but the same book people tried to ban saved my life.
>>
>>1098636
>I came within an inch of death but the same book people tried to ban saved my life.
Was it in a school library? No?
Okay finish drinking yourself to death then please.
>>
>>1098637
Yes I lirend to brew at burrows high school it took many years too become an alcoholic.I came within an inch of ding I cracked my ribs got alcohol poising cracko my ribs and my kidneys hurt so bad worse then cracked ribs.but God saved me the same book people want to ban from the library and yes I'm almost a year alcoholic and cigarettes free. My problem with baning books is we ban other
people sins and ignore our hown problem. All my love and respect .
>>
>>1098640
Stop it chang.
>>
>>1097419
They have a point. When you have anti-White teachers taking White students and non-White students to separate sides of the classroom facing eachother and teaching about who is the oppressor and who is the oppressed then you are being anti-White.

Also teaching the tenacious and reductive concept of White privilege developed from the CRT framework, and one that is largely false in how it is spoken by the majority of illiberals to students is teaching CRT.

I understand that some here have complaints since White people are finally starting to fight back against their anti-White agenda they have been aggressively pushing for the past 20 years, but understand this will be a new normal and the more you try to fight White people the more they will fight back and as history shows - the person/people who do that don't usually get the better end of that fight, so I would be very careful.
>>
>>1097493
White people are which is why they are fighting back.

Took long enough. Maybe we will redeem the last 70 years of shit we have been stomaching.
>>
>>1097552
You taking major Ls today bruh.
>>
>>1097499
Why didn't you read the rest of the link anon?

> unclear how many teachers have included the portion with the devilish character offering the whiteness contract. Rufo linked to several videos in which teachers or other staff read the book aloud in presentations purportedly intended for children.

>One was for a presentation to preschool-aged children. That particular reading appeared to omit the pages with the apparently demonic contract, as did two others.

>Three, however, did use that page. One showed a principal merely flashing the page and offering it as an additional activity.

Anyway, comparing the collective expression of White people - Whiteness - is certainly anti-White. I can understand White parents fighting back against these scumbags.
>>
>>1098647
>>1098673
>>1098675
>>1098678
>>1098679
Poor persecuted white boy
>>
I'm thinking this is about power and control a ware of ideas .A parent should decide if thair children can go in the baned book section .the problem is the schools demand blind obedience. If a child thinks he or his parents have the smallest freedom That will not grow up to be proper slaves I hear people talk about freedom every thing is illegal you can't ever spit on the ground on your property .
>>
>>1096155
kids dont even really know what sex is, they shouldnt be exposed to anything deviating from straight and monogamous sex education until they're at least in the late teens
>>
>>1099428
Its perfectly fine to have this position. I think its just kind of dishonest to pretend like the conservative position is that kids shouldn't be exposed to sex or romance in schools. You don't actually believe that. You just don't want them exposed to the idea that not being straight or monogamous is okay. Its a completely different argument than the one typically presented.
>>
Based
Keep the tranny propaganda out of schools, make the groomer's seethe.
>>
>>1099442
The argument is conservatives are banning books. Which is not happening. I don't know what hidden argument you're referring to that you're countering with this.
It's obvious that straight people don't want their children exposed to gay materials.
>>
>>1099535
>The argument is conservatives are banning books.
I could be mistaken but the person I was responding too explicitly said that children shouldn't be exposed to anything but straight and monogamous sexual education until they're almost 18. That absolutely implies that they believe material which features non-traditional sexual depictions should be removed from schools but traditional sexual depictions should stay. I'm talking to one person here, anon, not all conservatives.

>It's obvious that straight people don't want their children exposed to gay materials.
Sure, but my point is to draw a distinction between the argument that people don't want their children exposed to GAY materials versus the argument that people don't want their children exposed to SEXUAL materials. Those are two vastly different positions.
>>
>>1099542
>Sure, but my point is to draw a distinction between the argument that people don't want their children exposed to GAY materials versus the argument that people don't want their children exposed to SEXUAL materials. Those are two vastly different positions.
And people don't want their children exposed to overtly sexual materials either. So you have no argument it seems.
>>
>>1099544
>And people don't want their children exposed to overtly sexual materials either.
But that wasn't the argument here. The argument the anon made that I'm directly responding to is that sexual education in schools is okay but only if its enforcing heterosexuality and monogamy. It seems like you want to pivot between the two arguments and equate them but they're very clearly miles apart, especially given the fact that there is no faction of people out there advocating for children to be given sexually explicit material in school. You're boxing with a shadow.

>So you have no argument it seems.
I do, you're just not engaging with it.
>>
>>1099442
>I think its just kind of dishonest to pretend like the conservative position is that kids shouldn't be exposed to sex or romance in schools.
The problem here is that lefty activists are quite literally trying to expose prepubescent children to woke material in a public school setting, some of which includes sexually explicit illustrations. And when they are confronted, they immediately begin accusing everybody else of being homophobic.

Conservatives are upset because lefty degenerates are trying to hide grooming in schools by associating it with the progressive stack. Not even regular faggots want to be associated with these people.
>>
>>1099550
>The problem here is that lefty activists are quite literally trying to expose prepubescent children to woke material in a public school setting, some of which includes sexually explicit illustrations
Give me an example. Link me to a book or lesson plan that includes explicit images of sexual activity that any prominent left wing group is trying to get into the curriculum for per-pubescent children. I hear this talking point a lot but I've never seen any proof this is actually happening.

>And when they are confronted, they immediately begin accusing everybody else of being homophobic.
Give me a link, anon.

>Conservatives are upset because lefty degenerates are trying to hide grooming in schools by associating it with the progressive stack.
To my estimation, conservatives just call anybody that even tangentially supports LGBTQ rights as a groomer to the point that the word doesn't even mean anything anymore. So far every single accusation I've heard from conservatives has been completely unsubstantiated.
>>
It's not wat is being banned or why. Baning is about how has conrtoll. The school system is a monopoly, thay can have subgrade teachers,buy overpriced math book ever year with the same basic material,but thair investers may get upset if that find the best one and us it fore the next 50 years. The problem is parents have no legal rights to deside if thair child is read for lgbt studies or read about violce and murder every child has different need. most censorship is like propaganda the idea is to shame a grupe of people to isolate some one how is anti war,or vaccination, or black ,so you can lie about them or thair grupe. If the government was about the children we would not spend 2x the money on education as outher nations ,And have children how can not read or write at a junior after graduation .
>>
>>1099565
>Give me an example.
“Gender Queer” by Maia Kobabe has illustrations of sex toys and fellatio between underage characters.
https://meaww.com/gender-queer-book-school-library-backlash-lgbtq-sex-parents-furious
>Give me a link, anon.
https://www.vox.com/23021971/florida-gay-trans-lgbtq-laws
"Some of these proposals are more explicit than Florida’s — Tennessee’s proposal seeks to ban books or material that support or promote LGBTQ “issues or lifestyle” altogether — but all offer a window into how social conservatives see opportunities to roll back protections for queer and trans people: score victories in the courts and make the cultural fight more extreme."
>So far every single accusation I've heard from conservatives has been completely unsubstantiated.
Faggot.
>>
>>1096456
Trannies are extremists yes
>>
>>1096516
Fuck off glowtranny
>>
>>1097338
A rapist pedophile was blatantly trying to kill him. Rittenhouse defended himself and that is final.
>>
>>1099568
>“Gender Queer” by Maia Kobabe has illustrations of sex toys and fellatio between underage characters.
So lets review. Your claim was that there were left wing activist groups actively advocating for sexually explicit books to be taught to prepubescent children. The link you sent me was about a mom who found the book in the library, a book that was not being taught in curriculum. The school had no idea that the images were in the book and once it was brought to their attention it was immediately removed. There isn't a single mention in this link of any left wing activist group who advocated for this title to be in schools or got upset that it was removed. This is the motte and bailey bullshit I always go through arguing with you people. You make some grand claim and when we actually get to the evidence the goalposts get pulled so far backwards that it doesn't even remotely resemble your initial claim.

>https://www.vox.com/23021971/florida-gay-trans-lgbtq-laws
So your claim was that when conservatives call out leftists for wanting to groom children and show them sexually explicit content they accuse them of homophobia. The first link you gave me of leftists wanting to groom children and show them explicit content was a lie you made up. You literally just proved my point.

>Faggot.
The internet has melted your brain, anon.
>>
>>1099578
>Your claim was that there were left wing activist groups actively advocating for sexually explicit books to be taught to prepubescent children.
Why are you crying about these books being "banned" if it isn't true?
>>
>>1099578
>Your claim was that there were left wing activist groups actively advocating for sexually explicit books to be taught to prepubescent children.
Yes retard, because they are the ones who add those kinds of books to schools in the first place, and later attack the laws specifically designed to prevent grooming in schools.
For that book to arrive in the library, it first needed to be ordered and sorted based on content via the Dewey Decimal System.
Whoever added that book to the library knew what they were doing. It wasn't until parents began throwing a shitfit that it became public knowledge.
>>
>>1099583
Why are you sticking your head in the sand and denying reality again?
>>
>>1096147
These neofags won't rest until 5 year olds are sucking their cocks while wearing dresses. A reckoning is coming, and the population control eugenisits will pay for the shit show they created.
>>
>>1099622
Are you outraged?
>>
>>1096155
Gender Queer is in many school libraries. Try again faggot.

https://twitter.com/roddreher/status/1459197821740064771?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1459197949020413954%7Ctwgr%5E133d5b78a0a2dec653cdcabb20da4f5e145bf9be%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opindia.com%2F2021%2F11%2Fus-media-org-supports-gender-queer-a-book-that-contains-child-porn%2F
>>
>>1099625
Go back to twitter and stay there forever.
>>
>>1096141
For the good of mankind any "textbook" that fails to explicitly show socialism as a terrorist ideology, any propaganda that attacks traditional role models, any source of indoctrination into degenerate behavior must be eradicated.
>>
>>1099627
Nta but tell that to this fag >>1099220
>>
>>1099680
ok
>>
He hard truth is 10 of the population want to treat our children like thair lgbt The old definition fags lesbians and outhers was more truth full. Even before a little boy discovers his 11 finger can be yoused fore outher things than a poty break thay get mad jump up and down when censored but quickly censorer outher any way possible The scum of society have come together under one flag to abuse our children mentally and physically. the should should be baned along with cigarettes, alcohol,and porn ads It's not about the groups action in thair bedroom but outside I find offensive.
>>
>>1099715
Would you like to try that again, in modern English?
>>
Wew, imagine seeing transgenderism as anything but mental illness. Blows my mind that we’ve gotten here in only a few short years.
>>
>>1100223
"Being transgender is a mental illness" is a feelings over facts position. The entire medical community disagrees with you but you insist you are correct with zero education or experience in diagnosing or categorizing mental illnesses.
>>
>>1096141
Many if not most of the books talked or shower sexual acts and were available to minor. We have laws against this you know. Why do you lefties want to talk to 6 year old about sex so badly?
>>
>>1100238
Wew, imagine trusting doctors after watching the last few years play out.
>>
>>1100473
No shit. And imagine trusting any doctor who can't even tell a troon is mentally ill.
And worse, the troon marketing campaign is creating, for lack of a better word, chunibyo troons.
>>
>reality doesnt care about your feelings
>WAAAH MY PRECIOUS BABBEH NEEEEEDS TO NOT READ ABOUT THESE HORRIBLE HISTORIC EVENTS
republicans. every time.
>>
>>1100473
>>1100476
Damn bro you should really publish your findings. I bet the medical community would be thrilled to read your well researched study that leads to that conclusion.
>>
>>1100476
>chunibyo troons
We have fallen so far from God...
>>
>>1096196
Yvorenyf ner cnerfvgvp shpxvat cvrprf bs fuvg.
>>
>>1100480
I'd love to read their well researched studies too.
>>
>>1100480
>>1100488
suck a pill bottle, pharma shills
>>
>>1100489
Pharma? I work for the rope companies.
>>
>>1100480
You clearly haven’t learned how the machine works, yet. Forget about headlines, tv doctors, and politics. All you have to do is follow the money.
>>
>>1100687
Having redpill syndrome can be cured by killing yourself.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.