[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 30 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 001125.jpg (317 KB, 3200x1680)
317 KB
317 KB JPG
Post pictures and discuss flying aut/o/s
>>
File: 192161624.jpg (42 KB, 980x664)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>>1961100
>>
>>1961100
>>1961100
What a sexy beast
>>
I may never fly at supersonic speeds ever in my lifetime. RIP Concorde
>>
>>1961103
forgot your pic, homie
>>
File: Mil_Mi-10_CC.jpg (140 KB, 1028x683)
140 KB
140 KB JPG
>>
>>1961100
This is not transportation, have fun with your ban
>>
File: antonov.jpg (292 KB, 1600x1072)
292 KB
292 KB JPG
T H I C C
>>
File: big chopper.jpg (88 KB, 850x537)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
>>1961105
what was with the soviets and giant helis
>>
>>1961108
the need to transport ICBMs around the vast territory of the USSR without needing to build airfields or roads/rail lines
>>
File: Hawker.jpg (359 KB, 1920x1080)
359 KB
359 KB JPG
>>
File: F-14-Tomcat-History.jpg (143 KB, 1200x809)
143 KB
143 KB JPG
no plane is more A E S T H E T I C
>>
File: XB 70.jpg (1.1 MB, 4698x3159)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB JPG
>>
File: F18.jpg (70 KB, 1200x800)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>1961111
shit I meant to post picrel
>>
File: F8F-photo.jpg (142 KB, 1202x887)
142 KB
142 KB JPG
for me, it's the Bearcat
>>
I was a mechanic on the flight line at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily from 2001 to 2004. Saw pretty much all Nato aircraft close up, including top secret aircraft that had no markings.
>>
File: f14-silhouette5.jpg (206 KB, 2500x1004)
206 KB
206 KB JPG
>>1961113
no
>>
File: mystery_uav.jpg (43 KB, 1059x754)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>RQ-180
Think it's cool that this is this is the only picture ever taken of a drone that's been flying for over 10 years
>>
>>1961111
>queue Highway to the Danger Zone
>>27189724
shut up faggot
>>
File: DC3.jpg (1.16 MB, 1500x856)
1.16 MB
1.16 MB JPG
>>1961118
I think I prefer the DCs painted, but I'll admit Ive never seen a polished one in person though. Probably looks incredible flying by.
>>
File: X29.jpg (482 KB, 2474x1971)
482 KB
482 KB JPG
aesthetic or no?
>>
File: F-15.jpg (401 KB, 2000x1335)
401 KB
401 KB JPG
>>1961111
I do like twin engines but it looks weird with them so far apart
>>
File: Su-47.jpg (66 KB, 1280x752)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>1961120
better looking than the Russian knock-off
>>
>>1961117
That's the first pic taken of the B-21, which has been flying a lot longer than they get on.
>>
File: 77413.jpg (2.07 MB, 3497x2783)
2.07 MB
2.07 MB JPG
>>1961121
does look weird
>>
>>1961111
And what a combat record!
>>
File: porsche f14.jpg (363 KB, 1024x768)
363 KB
363 KB JPG
>>1961111
yeah
>>
>>1961121
Looks like an inspection panel flew off
>>
>>1961123
Is it? I believe it could be true. I get that it could be the B-21 because of the dual exhaust, but the RQ-180 is reportedly of similar size and it looks like this B-21 is flying upside down, where that ventral hump could be the RQ-180's housing for holding a radar array. Still cool that there are no official pics of the RQ-180
>>
File: P-47D_Wicked_Rabbit.jpg (252 KB, 1579x1053)
252 KB
252 KB JPG
>>1961100
based thread
I got banned on /k/ for a jugs joke about the p47... really steams my veggies
>>
>>1961129
>jugs joke
post it, negro
>>
File: Swamp Fox2.jpg (1.89 MB, 4032x3024)
1.89 MB
1.89 MB JPG
Saw this in Arkansas when I was out for a pleasure flight. He was on his way home from a show in North Carolina.
>>
File: F7F-Tigercats.jpg (203 KB, 2413x1649)
203 KB
203 KB JPG
>>1961114
also the Tigercat
>>
File: a6.jpg (232 KB, 1600x900)
232 KB
232 KB JPG
>>1961130
Oh, it wasn't funny at all, but an anon was asking why the p51 mustang always overshadows the p47 in films. I say it's because modern society is anti BIG JUGS because jewish subversion favors a large posterior.
>>
File: TONH_p51_WEB.jpg (205 KB, 2560x1100)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
>>1961133
> why the p51 mustang always overshadows the p47 in films
because the P-51 is an objectively better looking plane
>>
>>1961134
jeez that looks good
>>
>B-36
Pretty insane that the US built almost 400 of these monsters and they never saw combat
>>
>>1961135
yep. The P-51D is probably the most beautiful airplane design of all time
>>
File: supermarine.jpg (22 KB, 739x415)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
>>1961137
My one gripe is the bubble canopy. I prefer when it lines up with the rear fuselage
>>
File: ATR 72 MP.jpg (595 KB, 1200x819)
595 KB
595 KB JPG
>styled like a large military aircraft but it's smol
I just think they're neat
>>
>>1961114
The local airfield I work at has one of these in a hanger. Never seen it fly. however there is this other dude who has some chinese military fighter from the same time that he's been restoring. He often talks about how it's better built now than it was new.
>>
>>1961139
NEAT
>>
>>1961134
>>1961137
Something about the simplicity of the lines of the jug does it for me.
>>
File: f14 tbird mustang.jpg (309 KB, 1200x900)
309 KB
309 KB JPG
>>
File deleted.
>>1961138
Im the opposite. I prefer P51 with the bubble, in fact I think its one of the few planes of that era that look great with it.
The Thunderbolt on the otherhand I like infinitely more in its 'razorback' version.
>>
>>1961144
>>1961144
Repost your picture, brah
>>
File: B-21-First-Flight-scaled.jpg (253 KB, 2049x1545)
253 KB
253 KB JPG
The new kid. Pretty easy to tell apart from the B2, single point in the back instead of a zig zag.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAWr6BC_A4w
>>
File: concorde.jpg (59 KB, 735x737)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>1961103
No reason why supersonic airplanes won't be developed.
They're cool and there's a demand to fly them once they become safe. You might not afford it though but that's on you.
>>
>>1961123
>>1961128
It's an RQ-180. The B-21 is subtly different because it needs to actually carry bombs. Different airframe requirements, see >>1961218
>>
>>1961311
>They're cool and there's a demand to fly them once they become safe.
safety was never the problem with supersonic travel, the big problems are noise and high operating cost
>>
>>1961112
this is what the MiG-25 was built to intercept
>>
>>1961122
>single engine jetlet
>twin engine beast
>knock off
ok, kid
>>
>>1961139
couldn't they add any more unaerodynamic appendages?
>>
File: 1668682637107.jpg (3.21 MB, 4032x3024)
3.21 MB
3.21 MB JPG
>>1961110
the real, unsong hero workhorse of the Battle of Britain. but spitfires got the better looks, so they became the media darling..
>>
>>1961112
Beautiful
>>
>>1961120
Very aesthetic
>>
File: N957JB.jpg (66 KB, 711x533)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
New Jetblue livery
>>
>>1961127
that's the refueling socket, it's about to meet a tanker
>>
>>1962468
Huh, odd placement for that. I would think it'd be immediately in front of the pilot like all other planes I have seen.
>>
>>1961100
Why are cfI's always the worst fucking people
>>
File: _CAG4532.jpg (2.95 MB, 4255x2702)
2.95 MB
2.95 MB JPG
Smoll
>>
File: Mike-Pateys-DRACO.jpg (31 KB, 640x300)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
Vtol anyone?
https://youtu.be/MOUlyUAQ4Vk
>>
>>1962639
https://youtu.be/EmegEtzFxFA
>>
>>1961136
They lived up to their name.
>>
File: F-4 phantom wallpaper.jpg (107 KB, 1400x900)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
>>1961111
for me, its the Phantom.
>>
>>1962641
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfctWAoDXvs
>>
File: IMG_3357.png (2.68 MB, 1837x930)
2.68 MB
2.68 MB PNG
miku airplane



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.