[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 116 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]




File: 330px-0-4-0-engine.jpg (32 KB, 330x209)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
Weird/unique train thread
>>
That's one of those fireless steam engines, right?
>>
>>1761643
yeah
>>
obligatory
>>
conjoined twin train
>>
File: camelback2.jpg (1.56 MB, 2000x1348)
1.56 MB
1.56 MB JPG
>>
Someone post the forward cab stream locomotive, uploading files on mobile is broken for me.
>>
File: 01_Lüttmoorsiel.jpg (1.26 MB, 3648x2736)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB JPG
>>
File: 14C1072_020.jpg (315 KB, 1024x723)
315 KB
315 KB JPG
>>
>>
monorail
>>
File: Turbotrain.jpg (133 KB, 1023x645)
133 KB
133 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: BR_GT3_6-1.jpg (72 KB, 1078x558)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: sumida.jpg (521 KB, 1200x972)
521 KB
521 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: IMG_4193blog.jpg (520 KB, 1744x1179)
520 KB
520 KB JPG
>>
File: _MG_2200.jpg (1.14 MB, 3456x2304)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB JPG
>>
File: 8-Bad Gastein 2010 305.jpg (851 KB, 1024x768)
851 KB
851 KB JPG
>>
Armored train. I think this was built in South Africa but used in Namibia.
>>
>>1761757
fine I'll do it myself
>>
>>1761774
Wouldn't.
>>
>>1761859
>>
File: c4f3v6797z681.png (1005 KB, 1503x1006)
1005 KB
1005 KB PNG
>>
>>1761643
That particular one uses compressed steam.
>>
File: gaz12zim.jpg (292 KB, 1280x854)
292 KB
292 KB JPG
>>1761879
*compressed air
>>
>>
>>1761862
Cleveland Steamer
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (157 KB, 1600x1077)
157 KB
157 KB JPG
This is an electric tram that ran along the beach at Blackpool around the turn of the century. The tracks were normally submerged.
>>
File: cursed.jpg (211 KB, 1280x720)
211 KB
211 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogbj1y0rm7s
>>
>>1761763
I have never seen a good picture of the Turbomotive after it was rebuilt. Thank you for your service, anon.
>>
>>1761962
Why doesn't it have a door in the back?
>>
>>1761935
irl Steampunk is just superior to anything fictional
>>
I mean they built machines that moved BY THEMSELVES. That’s just magic at that point.
>>
File: tommythetrain.jpg (128 KB, 1000x810)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
>>
File: Schwebebahn2.jpg (1.17 MB, 3449x1937)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB JPG
>>
>>1762081
>>1761888
>>1761861
>>1761772
>>1761766
>>1761763
>>1761761
>>1761753
>>1761646
I've taken shits that were stranger than all of these combined. All those locomotives/MU's/railcars are simply conventional, albeit either one-offs or just an imitation of Tommy The ChooChoo
>>1761733
That's a photoshop
>>
>>1761768
It's older cousin, built out of war-time boredom to get to the beach quicker
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ph%C3%B6nizischer_B%C3%A4derexpress
>>
>>1762092
>I've taken shits
that's what every ass does
>>
British military railbike during the Boer War
>>
Southern Railway Q1, built in WW2 to minimise metal usage and maintenance time
>>
>>1762205
Should have electrified.
>>
>>1761935
Brighton, not blackpool
>>
Armoured train on the 15 inch gauge Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch railway during WW2
>>
>>1762211
>>
>>1762206
The southern railway was (and still is) largely 3rd rail electrified at 750v DC, no good for heavy freight trains
>>
>>1762211
>>1762213
Its only known kill was due to a pilot mistaking it for a full-size train and flying too low.
>>
>>1762092
ratio then
>>
>>1761762
weirder monorail
>>
File: Afb_35_F60_2012-07-30.jpg (496 KB, 3507x936)
496 KB
496 KB JPG
>>
>>1761935
>mfw it was legally a boat
>>
File: Einschienerp.jpg (24 KB, 307x403)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>1762366
>>
>>1761935
Did this shit ever derail?
>>
>>1762424
Stretching the definition of train there a bit, eh?
Though I guess it could fit into one of those 3x3 meme formats
>rail conservative, engine conservative: a LNER A4 is a train
>rail conservative, engine agnostic: a mobile conveyor bridge is a train
>rail conservative, engine anarchy: a CNC workpiece is a train
Anyway, here's a weird train to go with your picture
>>
>>
File: fireless.png (675 KB, 1491x450)
675 KB
675 KB PNG
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/45501804
>>
>>1761771
This is pretty cool. Looks like the inner cabins rotate within the base to allow the occupants to remain upright as the grade changes.
>>
>>
http://www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/locoloco.htm check this site
>>
File: Rail-Train_2.png (723 KB, 1024x512)
723 KB
723 KB PNG
I saw something like this near Tehachapi once. It was odd to see it moving independently as the larger train kept moving
>>
File: 1421622373904.jpg (710 KB, 800x599)
710 KB
710 KB JPG
Indonesian-built 2ft gauge sugar hauler in Carver, Massachusetts.
>>
>>1761655
>hey bill you comin or goin
>you know it hue hue hue
>>
File: i417279.jpg (100 KB, 885x498)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
>>
>>1762005
There's no escaping the death train
>>
>>1761646
I thought I recognised that bloody thing. One of those used to do the banana express run down into Port Shepstone bringing sugar cane from up Paddock/Kokstad way
>>
>>1762963
>yo dawg, we heard you like trains
>>
>>1763181
>TopGear and Man in Seat 61 crossover episode
>>
File: swisselec6.jpg (40 KB, 468x318)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
Swiss shunter converted to electrical heating during a WWII coal shortage.
>>
>>1763469
I think their nearly 100% switch to electric traction due to coal shortages was something they couldn't have achieved at a later point
>>
>>1761765
Someone should build one of these in Baghdad, so we can have a rack on a rack in Iraq
>>
File: hansaplatz-1957-jpg.jpg (323 KB, 1472x1024)
323 KB
323 KB JPG
>>
>>1763540
Nah, diesel wouldn't have prevented large-scale electrification, firstly because there's no oil reserves, while water power is cheap and abundant, and secondly because distances aren't long and stations frequent, so electric trains would still have a big economic and practical advantage.
>>
>>1763548
If it travels onto a mountain it'd be a rack on a rack on a rock in Iraq
>>
>>1761774
>>1761860
Imagine everyone gathering in the back to see the overhang :)
>>
>>1762187
those are clearly australians
>>
File: 18.jpg (502 KB, 1675x1256)
502 KB
502 KB JPG
>>
>>1763797
a lot of Britain’s colonies came together in that war
>>
>>1762205
will never stop loving them
>>
>>
>>1764134
Imagine if instead of making this stupid design, the PRR had used that boiler to make a Northern, or a really nice Texas to rival the C&O T1 they ended up straight copying. Even better, license the Turbomotive's variable nozzle tech. Alas, the engineering department at the Pennsy was hell-bent on dumb ideas at the time.
>>
File: Druckluftlok.jpg (62 KB, 717x471)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
>>1761643
>>
First cog railway in Switzerland
>>
>>1762205
>>1763923
Such a brutal design. If british trains can't compete on output cause of the limited loading gauge I wish we'd gone all in on sheer spartaness.
>>
File: The Pacer.jpg (1.44 MB, 1944x1296)
1.44 MB
1.44 MB JPG
>>1764558
>I wish we'd gone all in on sheer spartaness.
Be careful what you wish for...
>>
>>1764588
You may not like it, but this is what peak branch line performance looks like
>>
>>
Lima RTS2500
>>
>>1764588
>>1764689
these were actually good. people were just told they hated them by the TV.
>>
>>1765311
I've ridden in enough pacers over the last 30 odd years to know that their reputation isn't just a smear upon them but is well deserved. They are extremely shitty and spartan and are unpleasant and uncomfortable to ride in as a passenger.

That said, they aren't without merit. They were very cheap and a lot of smaller lines in the 1980s and 1990s couldn't have survived otherwise without them. The ever underfunded norf in particular would have struggled without them. A rattling drafty bogieless bus on rails is better than nothing at all at the end of the day.
>>
>>1765314
I liked them because you could actually open the windows. and the windows themselves were huge, so you could actually see out too.
>>
>>1765142
As far as I know there's only one of those Lima/Lima-Hamilton center-cab road switchers left in existence, at the Illinois Railway Museum. I don't know if it runs or not.
>>
>>1762983
very cool, tell me more
>>
>>1761753
That would be one hot cab.
>>
File: ascensor_lisboa.jpg (416 KB, 1280x850)
416 KB
416 KB JPG
>>
>>1767775
>Graffiti is art bro
>>
>>1765311
>these were actually good.
They were never good and they only got slightly better after an expensive rebuild less than 5 years into their life, causing them to cost around the same as Sprinters in the end.
>>1765314
>That said, they aren't without merit. They were very cheap and a lot of smaller lines in the 1980s and 1990s couldn't have survived otherwise without them. The ever underfunded norf in particular would have struggled without them. A rattling drafty bogieless bus on rails is better than nothing at all at the end of the day.
This is a common myth. As I stated above, they needed an expensive rebuild, resulting in them being not much cheaper than Sprinters at the end of the day.
In post BR days, their track access charges were also no cheaper than Sprinters.
>>
they took this from you.
>>
>>1761764
fun
>>
>>1761859
>>1761861
For what purpose?
>>
>>1768018
placing smoke behind crew so they don't suffocate in tunnels
>>
>>1761774
>>1763820
If we are discussing such "trains" then behold: I present the widest of gauges in all times: 9m
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krasnoyarsk_ship_lift
>>
>>1761888
Why do Germans always deliberately make things as ugly as possible
>>
>>1762459
Every time a major storm came
rails had to be rebuilt often
>>
Extra small DMU built by British Rail soley for the hastings line because the Victorian builders fucked up the tunnel and extra layer of bricks had to be put in each one so normal trains couldnt run
>>
>>1768907
hastings diesel shunting Thameslink class 700s before the depot was electrified
>>
>>1768907
>>1768908
Let's not forget the fabulously expensive special-edition versions of the Class 33 locos that had to be built slightly narrower for the Hastings line.

33/2 (narrow version) in front of a 33/1 (standard)
>>
>>1768908
English loading gauge is already tiny, that's gotta be one of the smallest standard gauge trainsets ever made.
>>
>>1768917
oh you can go much smaller
>>
>>1768932
This is cute, but I refuse to believe it has utility beyond its novelty. Those dmus are at least designed to do something.
>>
>>1768994
It is an entirely legitimate locomotive built for an industrial line with extremely limited vertical clearance.
>>
File: mallardstreamlineless.png (1.74 MB, 1280x716)
1.74 MB
1.74 MB PNG
not really a weird loco, just a nekkid A4

>>1767791
gas graffitifags
>>
File: j70-01[1].jpg (92 KB, 800x484)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>
File: lit_basedtrains.jpg (41 KB, 781x283)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>1761642
>>
File: Schwebebahn_2.jpg (670 KB, 1600x1200)
670 KB
670 KB JPG
suspended monorail funicular
>>
>>
>>1771411
lol

>>1771427
There was a period in time where so many weird ideas were being touted and built but never repeated as transportation technology rapidly developed... that's how you get things like that pic. There's something similar in Japan, but much more modern.
>>
>>1771427
Poor man's Wuppertal suspension railway
>>
i like trains
>>
>>1772245
good post
>>
>>1767905
Looking directly at the front of these things triggers my fight or flight response.
>>
>>1768932
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyFyrwEO_sQ
>>
>>1761753
You know what? Fuck you.
>Bullpups your locomotive
>>
>>1768932
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILN7hG4kUFg
>>
File: Western Maryland no 6.jpg (2.29 MB, 1800x1200)
2.29 MB
2.29 MB JPG
>No shays
>>
>>1772893
>flight response.
I get it. Because it was made by an aircraft company.
>>
bump
>>
File: shay.jpg (983 KB, 2576x1920)
983 KB
983 KB JPG
>>1774241
love a good shay
>>
Spanish Talgo train, 1940s
>>
>>1778750
Looks like they stuck the cockpit of an SR-71 onto a 1940s cartoon.
>>
>>1765142
I really love these mostly useless center cab transfer switchers.
>>
>>1771559
actually both was build by the exaxt same company at about the same time
>>
>>1774241
>>1778700

The only shay to ever exist in the UK.
>>
File: doom train fan.jpg (48 KB, 900x514)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>
>>1761642
bump
>>
Isnt the only weird train that matters is that centipede thing that lays the rack?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMXfU8blPMM
>>
File: IORE_108_Narvik_110713g.jpg (2.14 MB, 3747x2498)
2.14 MB
2.14 MB JPG
>>
>>1761859
I saw one IRL last year, absolute monster in person.
>>
>>1772893
I'm glad I'm not the only one. I've never been able to figure out exactly why but there's something really unsettling about it.
>>
File: chesire-cat.jpg (58 KB, 825x550)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>1778750
>>
>>1772893
The hardest mogg from the biggest dick. Let the submissive ecstasy consume you. Revel in your undoing.
>>
>>1772893
It looks like it's designed for ramming. Reminiscent of the wave piercing bow on a surf ski - it's even got the Epic livery.
>>
>>1761655
how does it manage not to rip in two pieces ?
>>
>>1784520
...because both bogies are going the same way. Are you retarded?
>>
File: James_Spooner_Feb_2022[1].jpg (2.82 MB, 2400x1600)
2.82 MB
2.82 MB JPG
>>1761655
Can't wait for the new one to be finished

>>1784520
Please be joking
>>
File: c110.jpg (89 KB, 550x424)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
>>1767838
The Pacers may have needed an expensive rebuild but they were quick and cheap to design and build, which was important regardless as numerous DMU's at that point needed to be either withdrawn or completely rebuilt to remove their fireproofing... which was full of Asbestos. Which was illegal. This meant that their rebuild was still a cost BR Could eat, something they couldn't do with older, less reliable railcars
>>
>>1761772
I like this little train
>>
>>
>>1788907
When is a train, just a cart.
>>
>>1762424
do you think he did all of that??
>>
bump
>>
File: ThumbsUp.jpg (245 KB, 1074x782)
245 KB
245 KB JPG
>>
>>1787143
>quick and cheap to design and build
The aggregate cost of a Pacer over its lifetime is 3x that of a Sprinter.
>>
"train", more like an unholy mix of ropeway, funicular and suspended monorail
>>
File: sukaireeru.png (2.49 MB, 1904x844)
2.49 MB
2.49 MB PNG
>>1795848
Holy shit that is cursed af

Apparently the point is being able to easily turn corners, while the structure isn't all that much more intrusive than a gondola. Also it's probably more resistant to wind.
>>
>>1795917
seems like a shitty small suspension monorail, if the trains were at least a bit longer it would make more sense
>>
>>1795848
>>1795917
It's also unusual that it uses linear induction motors to accelerate and brake the cars in and out of the stations (it has an intermediate station in addition to the normal termini).

One site did say it normally runs every 10 minutes, but can run at up to 75 second intervals, so obviously it has the ability to add and remove gondolas.
>>
>>1795950
It serves a hilly area full of single family homes, and each gondola holds 25 people, and the entire line is less than a mile long. There's no need for anything bigger. The operators can add gondolas to increase throughput if needed.
>>
>>1795963
>It's also unusual that it uses linear induction motors to accelerate and brake the cars
My first thought is that maybe the system doesn't allow for those slopes that accelerate normal gondolas, since these run on a rail.
>>
>>1795968
It's on a rail so it can go around curves like the other anon said. The linear motors accelerate the car to cable speed, then it clamps onto the cable, which minimizes cable wear. A lot of aerial gondolas use drive tires to do the same thing.
>>
>>1795972
wonder why they didn't just use the normal drive tire system, seems like overengineering
>>
>>1796155
Linear motors have no moving parts and tires to maintain. Probably offers finer control under varied loads. I would imagine that system was more of less a proof of concept and the ultimate goal was to sell more of them.
>>
>>1764360
it's the truck from Blast Corps
>>
>>1764588
I rode on Pacers a few years back, fun things.
>>
>>1771427
Looks inefficient af
>>
>>1796335
What do you mean?
>>
>>1796335
It's a regular funicular but you don't need to build a full ROW, just put down the supports for the suspended track. Probably not better in the end as the system didn't become popular, also maybe expensive for all the steel it needs, but I can see the logic behind it.
>>
File: nyc-m-497-tow.jpg (246 KB, 1200x568)
246 KB
246 KB JPG
Best weird train
>>
File: 1609126512859.jpg (209 KB, 800x450)
209 KB
209 KB JPG
>>1761642
>>
>>1767775
This has always been an incredibly weird one. It looks like it's a tram with a special tilting bogie for going up hills, but all it is is a funicular. It's surreal in form and function. It's also weird how it uses a pantograph to draw power.
>>
>>1783626
>robot track laying train
>with another crane train running on top of it
the future was here
>>
File: tsb.jpg (224 KB, 1142x928)
224 KB
224 KB JPG
>>1796598
It's a funicular with a level carriage, that's not particularly weird.
Now, the pantograph isn't used to draw power, instead both cars are connected in series to the motor at the top, so both have to give power for the funicular system to run, inversely, any car can stop the mechanism, which makes sense if there may be hazards on the road. Think of it like a water line with two faucets, only if you open both it'll run, at there'll be as much water as the least open faucet. Considering this is from the turn of the century it's stunningly brilliant engineering.

Other funiculars have pantographs at times, but they're usually just to power the electrics and/or for communication. And some have pantographs that are only used at the station to charge the battery for the electrics.
>>
>>1795963
>Every 10 minutes
i'm frankly amazed that the investment was considered "worth it" if the demand is so bad that running such a small car on 10 minute frequencies was enough
>>
>>1796644
>Now, the pantograph isn't used to draw power, instead both cars are connected in series to the motor at the top
quick google tells me that each car has an electric motor of its own rather than having a unified motor, so that's a bit weird
>>
>>1796659
it's Japan, as long as it employs people and pays boomers' pensions the government will fund it
turns out sovereign debt doesn't matter if you just never pay it off, never default and your currency is on a tight enough leash
>>
File: 130526.jpg (502 KB, 1200x800)
502 KB
502 KB JPG
VPRS-500. Looks kinda futuristic?
>>
>>
TfW's 67+mk4+DVT sets are probably the weirdest passenger trains running in the UK and I love them for it
it's just such an adorable anachronism, a callback to the days when big ugly freight locos hauled passenger stock on the daily
>>
hurrrr
>>
>>1798487
Good ol' rail bus
>>
>>1796661
Well why do you ask if your daddy Google is just going to tell yoy everything you fucking cuck
>>
>>1798514
why do american electric locos look so retarded
>>
>>1798487
reminded me of the french "micheline"
>>
>>1798535
>t. Toaster liker
>>
>>1798561
>Toaster
what
>>
File: aem7.jpg (129 KB, 1008x645)
129 KB
129 KB JPG
>>1798561
Toasters are fucking great
>>
Inspection engine
>>
>>1761645

So basically, battery powered
>>
>>
>>1767905
What train is it?
>>
>>1796644
>"TSB looks too intense for me!"
>>
File: 48886226032_b948c9d481_h.jpg (438 KB, 1592x1094)
438 KB
438 KB JPG
he fast
>>
File: Train.jpg (1.58 MB, 3245x2434)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB JPG
I saw this wacky thing at the Homestake Mine in South Dakota
>>
>>1802613
I think that’s powered by storage batteries
>>
>>1767905
Big Diesel wins again
>>
>>1796495
Ah, yes. The W1, AKA Hush-Hush, or The Galloping Sausage.
A shame it never earned LNER a single penny.
>>
>>1802704
>>1802613
was gonna say probably a battery engine for working underground.
>>
File: file.png (3.42 MB, 1600x1200)
3.42 MB
3.42 MB PNG
>>
>>1798536
Still active
>>
File: 1440px-SKITUBE4.jpg (313 KB, 1440x1080)
313 KB
313 KB JPG
The SkiTube to me is weird because it's an underground rapid transit system that runs in the middle of a national park in Australia. It transports people between ski fields and runs on a rack railway.
>>
File: holy fuck .png (1.02 MB, 863x844)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB PNG
>>1761935

wot
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N93Lkf894Ac
does this count as a train
>>
>>1761643
can they be operated on a small scale compared to electric or gas?
>>
>>1803565
never thought i'd see something i've been on in one of these threads
>>
File: logging train.gif (1.97 MB, 500x281)
1.97 MB
1.97 MB GIF
>>1778700
They're really fun to watch in action.
>>
>>1802613
Mining trains are always weird.
>>
File: Andreev.jpg (60 KB, 592x452)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
The tard locomotive.
>>
File: Sprinter.jpg (163 KB, 1024x674)
163 KB
163 KB JPG
>>1764588

It's a tram pretending to be a train.

Sprinter > Pacer
>>
File: 2iwjmw1e1i581.jpg (358 KB, 2047x1365)
358 KB
358 KB JPG
>>
File: imag0012mta4l8wpb6.jpg (107 KB, 800x604)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
>>
>>1806656
that looks suspiciously like a converted ex steam locomotive tender
>>
>>
File: 1441090861157.jpg (203 KB, 2048x1263)
203 KB
203 KB JPG
>>
File: Dampfkleinbahn_Bad_Orb_01.jpg (404 KB, 1592x1288)
404 KB
404 KB JPG
>>
File: czuq3rmsveicw6i17.jpg (137 KB, 1061x707)
137 KB
137 KB JPG
>>
File: 1449901342566.jpg (326 KB, 2048x1360)
326 KB
326 KB JPG
>>
File: Capture.jpg (319 KB, 912x684)
319 KB
319 KB JPG
Does live steam count



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.