>>1710413If its nuclear, what is propelling those turbines? Steam?
>>1710423>Power would be derived from the heat generated by a nuclear reactor and transferred to four jet engines where it would superheat the air passing through to provide thrust
>>1710423>if it's nuclear, what is propelling those turbines? steam?/n/ is once again the most delusional board
>>1710600What did he mean by this
>>1710633Supersonic long range high altitude erkanoplane
>>1710600Nuclear reactor convection cooled with air . Air comes through fan/compressor creates heat as it cools reactor and increases air pressure. This air is put through the turbine and subsequent exhaust.Just replaces the fuel.
>>1711020a high altitude ground effects plane? wut.
>>1711709DON'T INTERRUPT MY FANTASY
>>1710633wasn't this piece of shit impossible to build? the concept was way ahead of the engineering capabilities of its time
>>1711709Yes.The thing was supposed to be able to fly high, and use ground effect. https://youtu.be/UD7xiWWs-bs
>>1710413Impressive it could get off the ground with the amount of shielding required.
>>1711839>the concept was way ahead of the engineering capabilities of its timeand it still is
>>1712163Lad in the 1950s they had flight crews moving fission cores from a birdcage to the delivery system barehanded.
>>1712172Could probably work now. Using composites to reduce weight. Replace all the lift jerseys with a pair of bypass jets that power lift fans and vector thrust like the f35.
>>1710633Checked and cool looking plane desu>>1711839>>1712172>Impossible to build>and it still is>Unironically saying this while responding to an image of said "impossible to build" plane flying in the airRetards
"All modern aircraft have four dimensions: span, length, height and politics. TSR-2 simply got the first three right." -Sydney Camm
The Fairey Rotodyne could have been a very useful aircraft if the flaws had been ironed out.
>>1717315I'm almost sure they were, but the Cosa Nostra had already crapped all over it by the time it happened.I'm not in the mood to post a new thread for this, but this is another approach for affordable fuel cells:https://news.rub.de/english/2021-05-12-biocatalyst-enzyme-system-hydrogen-industryhttps://www.theengineer.co.uk/biofuel-cell-platinum/
>>1717315I don't know that you can iron out the flaws of a rotorcraft when the primary flaw is that it is a rotorcraft.
>>1717315They could make it function, but they'd never actually convince cities to allow their use for their intended purpose of skyscraper to skyscraper transit between cities. They'd find a niche but they'd never take off.
>>1718136Forget cities. You couldn't fly the fucking thing within two hundred miles of land. Noise problems killed the Concord.
The single largest leap in air-to-air combat technology until the F-35, one can only imagine a world where the US government didn't force Canada to shut it down.
>>1718141The idea that Canadian interceptors could successfully defend against an attack by supersonic bombers launched from Vladivostok is beyond comical. Nobody could possibly have ever taken that project seriously, except as a great way to funnel public money to war profiteers.
>>1718141Canada peaked in the 60s and it’s been downhill ever since
>>1718216It's the Trudeaus.
>>1717315>>1718130there's not a lot of ways to fix "hot tipjet rotors are hellishly loud" other than removing the tipjets themsleves.And now you have to stick a tail rotor on it, and have just built "big helicopter"
>>1718141The reason it got shut down is that a mach 2 point defense interceptor with a combat range of 200 miles at intercept speed is totally useless as a defense against nuclear attack in a world with ICBMs. By the time the Arrow got canceled, it was clear that nuclear war wasn't going to entail Bear bombers flying over the north pole.It was a plane designed with cutting-edge technology to address a threat model that only existed for ~7 years.The USA canceled the F-108 (a very similar aircraft) at the same time. Everything related to ever-faster bombers and correspondingly fast interceptors got killed in this period. The only reason anyone remembers the Arrow vs all the other cancelled projects is that it was literally the only thing going on in the cannuk aerospace world. The *way* in which the Arrow got cancelled was simply insulting, and one does wonder if they could have done it in a way that didn't decimate the entire country's aerospace sector.
>>1718620>The *way* in which the Arrow got cancelled was simply insulting, and one does wonder if they could have done it in a way that didn't decimate the entire country's aerospace sectorProbably not, but even if such aircraft didn't have the 30+ years of service that is hoped out of such craft, the fact of the matter is that the UK and France wanted enough of them to justify the cost of the project being completed and would have built a good backbone for Avro and Bombardier to have built their expanding aerospace arms on.
>>1711867>fly high, and use ground effectNot at the same time
>>1713383Wait, wasn´t that that plan to power a spaceship by exploding nukes behind it?I still can´t get over the fact that somebody really thought this was a good diea.
>>1719390If it's stupid but it works, it ain't stupidhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8Sv5y6iHUM
>>1718657>UK and France wanted enough of them to justify the cost of the project being completedThe little nuclear rockets would actually have made excellent ground attack weapons against the soviet tank forces. Would've worked great in 'nam for that matter.
>>1718911"prototype" - pretty sure that's just paint or sticker windows, neither aircraft was ever modified for passengers
>>1717975Also I couldn't find about Carbon Nitride when I searched about hydrogen storage methods. It seems to work very well (10% w.t. H2).Another thing that wasn't so clear. Metal-air batteries can work as flow batteries, so its capacity can be increased by having a bigger tank storing metal slurry:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc%E2%80%93air_battery#Alternative_configurationsIn this configuration there is only one anode catalyst, oxygen membrane and other expensive component, chosen proportionally to the required power output and not total storage capacity.Also filters made for separating oxygen from the air have improved a lot and were tested on combustion engines, using a separate component releasing pre-filtered oxygen into the porous catalyst at the cathode may be better than the current approach of mixing all functions into one component (the cathode and the oxygen capture).>>1718613It got down into levels that passed some requirements (still loud). But the whole series of events that led to it being cancelled looked very suspicious and african.
>>1710413>1100 foot winspanAre you under the impression the Air Force can somehow fly this thing without anyone seeing it?
>>1720080pluto was just too based for this world... just like Linear Aerospike and Venturestar.
how would they get into the planes if they were under the wing of the carrier plane?
>>1725068whats the sauce on that
>>1725076>>1725068this is very important
>>1719390Arriving in a solar sistem by decelerating with nukes is the most assertive way to present yourself to a new civilization.
>>1711801Ah finallySomeone took my first grade paper plane and made it a thing
>>1717132It's a still photo with no background referenceIt could be on freefall and you wouldn't notice any difference in the pic
retooling,,thread.,,,issue,,Transportation,,in theage of Imperial intangelments.,,,and how toavoid unwanted,,,touching.,,,,like,maybe canoe?,,or simple dogsled.,
>>1711801Supersonic passenger aircraft are unimaginably based, but they are also boondoggles for anyone trying to design and build one. You hear about a new design every couple of years, and then radio silence afterwards when the project inevitably goes belly-up.
>>1718141>>1718620We're still coping and seething about it to this day. I agree that it definitely could have been done better, since it left us with the current dire straits of having the Fr*nch as the only aircraft builders in the country, but even then I'm not sure how. Canada doesn't even have the tax base to maintain a single shitty highway from coast to coast, let alone a massive aerospace and defense industry.The arrow was definitely a based design though, it's too bad it got cancelled and the company dissolved right after.
>>1717312Seen one irl at Duxford, amazing looking plane.
The Saunders Roe Princess
The Saunders Roe Duchess, a jet powered passenger sea plane.
The Saunders Roe Queen, a 1000 passenger behemoth with a 24 engines.
>>1730122>>1730123Based Saunders-Roe enjoyer. >>1730125 This one looks like a coked-out Fallout 4 design though.
>>1710413Make it s blimp and you have something.>>1710633>sky>or just above the waterPick one>>1718509Why don't we have this? We have sky crane.>>1711801>>1716105>>1718854>>1718911>burn twice the fuel to just sit around for 6 hours once you get there anywayMakes sense. >>1730122>>1730123>>1730125Why not just fly two of whatever the sweet spot largest plane is instead>>1718730So it did this for about ....one second?>>1717315>giant rotary wing, giant winglets fighting the down force.>Should have been working on a tilt rotor the whole time>>1713383>>1720080>>1724692>>1724515How do these compare to Sea Dragon?>>1718141>>1729981Turns out, living on the big bad U.S.s back like mold does not a critical mass of an economy make.
>>1716105I remember this being shilled everywhere for some reason. Guess they weren't good enough.
>>1731421There was a huge article cover story article in Popular Science in 1998 about why it never worked. Thought that would have ended it. Yet here we are.
>>1711801i wish they made this 757 sized rather than a widebody. that would have actually been somewhat more feasible and could have resulted in one actually being built.
>>1731681Swing wings are terribly maintenance intensive.
>>1718141I’m convinced everyone who shills the arrow is just being contrarian.
>>1731355>Why don't we have this?Because it is simpler, cheaper, more flexible and more reliable to make shaped containers that go inside the plane instead of a single large detachable external container.
>>1731694do sky crane is only for logging?
>>1731686i mean, if boeing can secure orders then whatever happens after it leaves the factory floor isnt their problem.