Are women only railway coaches good or bad?
>>1666434Good thing, keeps the men's half of the train less noisy
I don't know. What do you think, OP?
I thought the whole point of them was to reduce groping on rammed commuter trains, the fuck is the point of it on long distance sit down intercity shit apart from >>1666450?
>>1666434Imagine the smell
>>1666488Keeps the smell out too. Fed up of w*men that think their £5 perfume covers up the scent of raw sex
>>1666488shariah
>>1666434Yes. Hopefully they can reintroduce women-only lounges back into pubs and bars as well
Bad for the environment since it makes the rolling stock less efficient.
>>1666434Good as long as the coaches get decoupled after a certain point and fall off into the ocean.
depends on the culture, often Muslim-majority countries also applied it to buses
Jakarta's commuter rail has done this since 2011, but some female commuters are known to fight over seats in women-only cars. Some won't give up their seats for pregnant woman even
>>1666434Women only coaches present a very interesting set of questions for transit design. They definitely work as a solution to the fact that women are more vulnerable on public transit, as they’re more likely to be targeted and less able to defend themselves. So if these cars get implemented, what’s to stop some crazy homeless guy from walking onto the women’s car? There would have to be special enforcement for that particular car, which begs the question, why not just have that extra enforcement for the entire train? If shit starts going down on the men’s train is the women’s guard going to do something? I dunno. I see no reason not to try it but I just know someone’s gonna find a way to fuck it up somehow.
>>1666625>Some won't give up their seats for pregnant woman evenI literally stand up on reflex whenever I see a pregnant woman and it's not just because of my fetish.
>>1666669>>1666657>just
Try to ask for a men’s only one.
>>1666625good, disabuse any remaining women of the delusion that they're "gentler" than men
thinking about man-only railway carriages and laughing>doors that have to be kicked open>diesel exhaust blown through air conditioning
>>1667433tubs of crisco and leather gear in the airing cupboard
The idea was debated early on for the NYC subway but suffragettes thought it would make women look weak and it died. For a short time there were women only cars on the Hudson and Manhattan tubes.
as long as they don't have biological women only cars or too many security cameras I'm good
>>1666488it's not actually women-only, it's just painted pink
>>1667578>it's not actually women-only, it's just painted pinkFor what purpose
>>1666434It's a good sign you entered a 3rd world
>>1667433>bench seating made of cartridge cases and rusty foot lockers
>>1667433>>1667516>>1667830oh FUCK yes
>>1667562/r/jesuschristreddit/
>>1666434No. It's basically affirmative action in culturally sexist countries like Japan that refuse to deal with their problems in a meaningful way
>>1667848>sexist>problem
>>1667971Go back to /pol/
>>1667986Go back to Tumblr
>>1667848>implying that's a bad thing
>>1667971>>1667988>>1668001samefag tourist
>>1668003Nope. Try again
>>1668003Where do you think you are?
>>1666434Why so many women should be out of their husband's house at the same time to justify a separate coach?Anyway, pros:- No impure thoughts while on the train- No touchingcons:- The male guardian cannot accompany her woman according to Sharia LawSo my final verdict on the matter is haram.
>>1667596Pink is pretty
>>1668028According to tradition, a man would delegate the protection of his haram to a well trained Eunuch. The modern equivalent of a eunuch would be would be a soiboi with a lightsaber
>be gigachad gaijin>go on women's car "by mistake">japans birth rate spikes
>>1667848>>1667986>>1668003>problems>implyingback to the bunker bunkhouse buck
>>1666488I just don’t think Florida politicians are too worried about women being groped
>>1667596Brightline color codes their trainsets, this one is called Bright Green
>>1666434I identify as female.
>>1666434A requirement. Imagine your daughter on a train full of black men?
>>1666434I thought only japan had these
>>1674448Mutts law Rent free
>>1675456there is no reason to make them in the west, they would be full of trannies.
>>1666450fpbp
>>1670440Lol Gigachad has a small penis
>>1673029it's got yellow on it
literally discrimination
>>1675838Honestly, troon-only coaches (or even better, trains) would be great. Straight to Dachau.
>>1666434>BrokeShariah Haram Train>WokeFemale Safe Space Train
>>1676264He's a grower, not a shower.
>>1670400So transwomen will guard the women's cars, assuming they're post-op, apply within for special stickers
>>1667596Because that's a whole theme of the railroad "bright-line" so they have a bright pink train a bright yellow train bright excetera excetera.
>>1666434Can there be a train that doesn't allow ugly or fat people to board?
>>1676292as does the pink one
Absolutely not. I'd never respect them if they were introduced here. Terribly sexist.
>>1667848Changing cultural sexism is a generations long project and doesn't really help the women getting groped or harassed right now
>>1680779Why don't they just carry guns? I know in nipland guns are banned but they can carry a knife or pepper spary or a tazer or something.
>>1666434Bad. It's unconstitutional that I pay equal taxes to a woman yet get unequal service. We already figured the separate but equal issue a while ago. It's literally sexist.
