Baroque Editionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Rv9ppP6A8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSZJ__GIbmshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVGYXFGaLqkThis thread is for the discussion of music in the Western classical tradition.>How do I get into classical?This link has resources including audio courses, textbooks and selections of recordings to help you start to understand and appreciate classical music:https://pastebin.com/NBEp2VFhPrevious Thread: >>106462853
Let's kick off this thread with a positive vibe!https://youtu.be/ezthDp7WjIg
Baroque music is so dated. I only listen to older music, like early renaissance, because since it's older and more primitive it's clearly not as dated as the music that followed it. This makes sense, and I'm not a posturing dilettante.
>>106484653I've never heard anyone say this
Let's discuss real classical musichttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOmHpI0MMKE
>>106484661of course you haven't, you dated, immature brainlet. I, however, have outgrown baroque and can only listen to earlier stuff that doesn't sound as dated as it
>>106484441https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAZ8PA5_gVA&t=203sIs it just normal for pianist to just ruin their own recordings now? Tell me I'm not the only one who hears this shit.
>>106484513*yawn* classical, huh? Have you tried something less dated, like des Prez or Palestrina? Maybe you just need to grow up for the coin to flip, you know?
>>106484791>Falla's Concerto for Harpsichorddang, that's great, never knew he wrote something like this
I have a serious question about what I should listen to next but after the fiasco of the past three threads I'm afraid I will only get replies like "tranny" and "Petzold" and "just listen to Wagner"
>>106485006There are still posters willing to respond to questions in earnest in my experience, but yeah, you might have to ignore or hide a few posts.
there's something about baroque music that isn't superficial and posh like classical music. classical music feels so dated and anachronistic to be listening to it in 2021? do you get what I mean?
>>106485019>do you get what I mean?No, because I was born with a functioning brain.
>>106484513that actor looked so breedable in amadeus
>>106485018I'm going through this vast music listening experience backwards, time-wise. Not to say I don't listen to "newer" composers now and again (I've been listening to a lot of turn-of-the-century french, russian and spanish pianists lately for example), but I like to work my way towards the past. Having listened to composers like Schubert, Mendelssohn, Von Weber and Spohr, where should I go next? Reicha? Dive straight into Beethoven's entire oeuvre? What's the immediately next (or previous, if you will) composer I should listen to so as to continue this unbroken chain?
>>106485080John Field, maybe? Famously invented the Nocturne that Chopin improved upon and later Fauré perfected
>>106485080Listen to Mozart already.
>>106485080Johann Nepomuk Hummel>His music reflects the transition from the Classical to the Romantic musical era. He was a pupil of Mozart, Salieri and Haydn. He was also friends with Beethoven and Schubert. sounds exactly what you're looking for in terms of continuity. But, Reicha's also a very goot pick though...
>>106485080Assuming that Schumann and Chopin are among the composers you’ve covered among those other early Romantics, then Beethoven does sound like the next step in terms of the most central figure to that transition from Classical. I would say try Rossini as a complement as well since he and Beethoven were sometimes contrasted in their time as representative of the differing directions that music was taking.
>>106485143there's a whole lot of important composers between him and Von Weber, though, which is what I'm asking for>>106485115>>106485151hmmmmmmmmmmm intredastin>>106485211>Assuming that Schumann and Chopin are among the composers you’ve coveredThey are!>try Rossini as a complement as well since he and Beethoven were sometimes contrasted in their timeWhat, like a proto Wagner vs Brahms? Alright, I'll eventually listen to both, but for now I'm more interesting in someone whose oeuvre is mostly instrumental. Beethoven, though, even if I have already listened to the more notable works before I decided I'd do the whole degressive journey here still feels like too much. Schubert was pretty intimidating in terms of sheer hours of music, and I understand Beethoven was even more prolific. But if that's a better stop than the three already mentioned I guess I'll buckle up and dedicate a few months of my life solely to that. Still, I'll wait and see what recommendations others come up with.
>1870 >goes to local hashish parlor>takes huge hit from his hookah pipe>"dude trolls lmao">*Writes greatest orchestral piece of the 19th century*
>>106485257he was a good unitarian christian boy and all he wrote is pure and clean
>>106485277Exodus 30:23>Take thou also unto thee principal spices, of pure myrrh five hundred shekels, and of sweet cinnamon half so much, even two hundred and fifty shekels, and of sweet calamus [Cannabis] two hundred and fifty shekels
>>106485310>Sweet calamus - The fragrant cane (or rush) was probably what is now known in India as the Lemon Grass.>The calamus in Exodus 30 is a reed. The Hebrew root of the word myrrh means flowing, and the root for calamus means standing up. Calamus grows in a marsh or muddy place. But even though it grows in a marsh, it is able to shoot up into the air. According to the sequence of the spices, this calamus signifies the rising up of the Lord Jesus from the place of death. The Lord was put into a marsh, into a death situation, but in resurrection He rose up and stood up. Calamus, therefore, signifies the precious resurrection of Christ.
>>106485358That's a common mistranslation, because the reed it refers to is sweet flag, which is also psychoactive
>>106485249>What, like a proto Wagner vs Brahms?Probably nowhere near as vicious, but a little like that. Taruskin devotes a chapter to it in his History of Western Music: >The man who did inherit the Mozartean operatic legacy (albeit not “from the hands of Haydn”) was cast immediately—and in terms that resonated far beyond the confines of the opera house—as Beethoven's opponent, his rival, or (to use the language of German philosophy), his dialectical antithesis. In Gioacchino Rossini, the hardy pre-romantic temper survived into the romantic age, and thrived to the point where even Raphael Georg Kiesewetter (1773–1850), an Austrian nobleman who in 1834 published the first scholarly history of music in German (thus becoming the first “musicologist” in the present day sense of the term), found he had to title his concluding chapter not “The Age of Beethoven,” as national pride might have prompted him to do, but “The Age of Beethoven and Rossini.” This is well worth pointing out because a century and a half later, in 1982, the eighth volume of the authoritative and impeccably scholarly New Oxford History of Music was issued, its title page emblazoned “The Age of Beethoven, 1790–1830.” The only apology came in the form of an editorial introduction, which began, “The title of no other volume of the New Oxford History of Music includes the name of a composer. But no other period of musical history is so completely dominated by one composer.” Nobody during the period in question would have agreed with that statement. The word “history” in the second sentence should obviously have been replaced by “modern historiography.” A historiography of early nineteenth-century music that allows itself to be completely dominated by Beethoven is one that has deliberately read his antithesis out of the canon.
>>106485387just because it's called acorus calamus doesn't mean it's the one alluded to in the bible
>>106485392Wow, that's a lot of revisionism, but it's fine, I guess. Antiquity is not always the best authority anyway.So, so far I'm torn between Reicha and Hummel. What can you folks tell me about each so as to convince me to choose one? Or are any other composers to consider before them?
>>106485418You'll probably find an easier time finding recordings of Hummel than Reicha desu. Also listen to Clementi after both of them. This cute little sonata later influenced Mozart in his overture to The Magic Flute.https://youtu.be/oGxP-AtKRB8
>>106485585>Clementihe should come after Mozart then. Hoo boy, gonna be a few years til then. I'm sad to hear Reicha would be hard to find, since he seemed like a very forward looking composers notably ahead of his time. Hummel wins so far, but I'll let the question rest so that other people can have a say, if they're so inclined
18th International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition LIVEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeqKVPF0zwA
>>106484653That's crazy bro but who asked
>>106484441I can't stand the sound of the harpsichord, it just sounds really cheesy to me.
>>106486170who will win?!
>>106486345I can't stand the harpischord nor the piano. I like the fortepiano.
>>106485151Louis Ferdinand von Preussen and Joseph Wolfl are also great composers of the transition from classical to romanticism
i believe in tchaikovsky supremacy.
scriabin believes in scriabin supremacy.
>>106486753we get it, you’re gay
>>106486878enjoy your AIDS
Are there any decent 18th or 19th century composers who weren't taught by other top composers/educators of their time?Not necessarily self-taught, but taught by the kind of person who doesn't have a wikipedia page.
>>106486885haha verry funny
>>106486955satie but hes not decentso no.
>>106484441does anyone know the song that bands sometimes play at american football games? i liked it when i was in high school.>da da da daaaa da da da, da da da daaa da da dait's like that
>>106486807the slavonic march is one of the best marches
>>106487197Land of a Thousand DancesAlso not classical
>>106487225no, it's played with wind instruments
>>106487232Beats me then, your da da daas are too vague I'm afraid
>>106487297dada da daaaada da dadada da daaaa da dada da da
>>106486977thanks>>106487215yeah if you’re gay maybe
>>106487308Oh shit I know what you're talking about I think. After the first bar the people sitting in the bleachers yell "Hey!" Right? Shit I wish I knew the name of that one
>>106487325>"Hey!"ours didn't, but our crowd never said anything, so maybe other crowds did
what are the properties of jewish music?
Why is it that Chopin's etudes are so easy to play but Bach's music is so hard aaaaahhhhh
>>106488247*blocks your path*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XCj-j7TBTY
>>106486170stop shilling thatrigged shit
>>106484653>>106484661I kind of get it. While baroque music is undeniably more advanced harmonically, etc, early renaissance polyphony has a kind of ancient timeless quality. Bach is still peak music though
>>106487308Can you record a vocaroo?>>106487325This would be Gary Glitter's "Rock and Roll Part 2" but I think anon might be talking about something else
Jessus Crist this shit is so fucking slow, the eroica takes 57 minutes.
No, seriously guys, is it only me? I compared it with Leibowitz's performancehttps://voca.ro/1fnbfYaVDNey
>>106489207>>106489374Ya that's pretty slow. Giulini always seems to take things slowly, at least what I've heard from him always has.
>>106489374https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAxtrBUtFBEjesus even kna isn't that slow
>>106488247Because you don’t have any understanding of counterpoint or polyphony
>>106489462wtf is this shit, it has more white noise than music lmao
Who's /bruckner/ here?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfB27tyWr7Ibruckner symphonies ranked:5>7>9>4>6>8>3>1>2>0>00
>>106489753>>106489825actually I should have put the 6th before the 4th, 4th has a good first movement but the 6th has a great 1st, 3rd, and 4th movement although the coda is lackluster imo
OH NO NO NO NO
>>106489927Fdid the jury pick the pieces?
>>106489927He actually played that shitty fugue?. RIP if yes
>>106489855I'm actually considering putting the 0 before the 4th
>>106489927A bit rude to play Chopin's posthumous works ain't it?I'm pretty sure he asked for them to be burned.I understand going against his wishes for historic preservation, but to actually perform them is a bit much.
>>106489825What good performances are there of 0 and 00? Are they even really worth listening to? I assume they aren't.
>>106490169What a faggy take.
>>106490169Performing the shit ones is a bit too much. Chopin's fugue is laughably bad.
>>106490185>What good performances are there of 0 and 00?Studiensymphonie: Georg Tintner, Royal Scottish National OrchestraDie Nullte: Georg Tintner, National Symphony Orchestra of Ireland>Are they even really worth listening to?yes
>>106490228>>106490007What's bad about it? I like it
>>106490275It's just a parody of a fugue by how badly it is
>>106490315Ok but what's bad about it
>>106490328the way it's written
>>106490328It's a two-voice fugue so it is much less interesting than three or four voice fugues, which usually are the norm when writting a fugue. Now the rest is rather subjective but to me it is unimaginative and poorly written. It reads and sounds like a student attempt of a fugue, and not a good one.
>>106490409it sounds like the shit people post here asking us to rate it
post the /classical/ chopin fugue meme
https://youtu.be/-16xPNpnM1o?t=11it's a good fugue
>tfw /classical/ was a shittier as it is now back five years agohttps://4chanarchives.com/board/mu/thread/63359179
>>106490605not as much
>>106490563>fzsss shhh crakc popit sure is
>>106489927>no one picking any preludes
>>106491031i think the 24 preludes were meant to be played all together or something like that
>>106491053I just now saw that the last guy tonight was gonna play all 24 of them lol, so I guess I'll listen to that
>>106489927just waching the replay, what did he mean by this ?
>>106491261he means that the World Trade Center can't write a fugue for shit
I was searching the other day for a porn movie related to classical music and, to my suprise, there is none. I expected something at least about Mozart or Beethoven, but there is nothing. The closest thing are some old italian movies ambiented in the victorian era.
>>106491753Boy do I have a composer for you
I can't find a download for Turina's Margot and Jardín Del Oriente and it's got me really fucking moody I gotta say
>>106491873go to spain
Outside of the last three, I haven't ventured much into the Schubert piano sonatas. What are some of your favorites /classical/?
>>106489753I’ve been on a Bruckner kick lately, bought the scores of 4 5 6 7 8 and have been reading them to study form, counterpoint and motivic development. Can some Brucknerfags here recommend me good performances of all those symphonies?
>>106492493https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIrWYqQ5bPIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTP0p5giNdghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_uiiGRBVVgahhh... i'm hissing
what kind of piano music is much harder to play than it sounds?
>>106492593yeah fuck this, from now on im just going to read old talkclassical threads for recommendations
Kuhlau is such an underrated composer
https://youtu.be/cdYTHXz2ibgImagine waking everyday to this organ chord, I bet your life would improve considerably
Hissbros, what was the first good recording of Chopin?
>>1064924934: Karajan [EMI]5: Dohnanyi [Decca]6: Sawallisch [Orfeo]7: Bohm [DG]8: Boulez [DG] (Yes, for real)
>>106492650don't mind if i ignore that page and read the other 22 pages with normal non-ancient buttfuck literally who recommendations>>106492668i heard sawallisch's bruckner 5 on hurwitz's recommendation and it was resoundingly meh compared to jochum's (which he shat on earlier in the video), is his 6 any good? also maybe it's just me but i've kinda avoided dohnanyi ever since i heard his painfully dull bartok MSPC, what a disappointing recording.
>>106492668>KarajanOpinion automatically discarded
>>106492651Pachmann comes to mind also Raoul Pugno
Hypothetically, would a castrato sound any different from a transfemale singer who took HRT before puberty?
>>106492729HIP was a mistake
>>106492729One day I will track and hunt you down if you keep being this obnoxious.
>>106492706>is his 6 any good?I honestly wouldn't recommend it if I didn't think it was good. I haven't heard his fifth and also don't generally consider Sawallisch a great conducter for what it's worth. But that sixth? Yes!Dohnanyi is hit and miss but I really like his Bruckner (incomplete) cycle. Only no. 7 is a dud imo.
>>106492850at this point i only really watch hurwitz to know what recordings exist, his top recommendations have done me dirty so many times i don't take them seriously anymore
>>106492861>have done me dirty so many timesThe fuck does this mean?
>>106492888as in they fucking suck and i waste my time downloading them from private trackers and listening to them only to be disappointed
>>106492493>>106492614calm down, serious answer coming through4: Eliahu Inbal, Radio-Sinfonie-Orchester Frankfurt (1982[84?])5, 6, 7: Gennadi Rozhdestvensky, USSR Ministry Of Culture State Symphony Orchestra (85-88?)8: Georg Tintner, Ireland National Symphony Orchestra (1996)
>>106492633that's possibly the worst, blandest, most soulless recording of his organ words I've ever heard. Try pic related for a proper interpretation.
>>106492942Post link fag
>>106492958download soulseek, shit eater
>>106492970Yeah, not going to your tranny site, post link or you actually didn't prove anything and my pick recording remains supreme
>>106493006>tranny sitewhat>you actually didn't prove anything and my pick recording remains supremeyou know what, you deserve mediocrity. Have fun with your garbage recording.
>>106493026"she" has a penis doesn't it
>>106493040>no tits>has to suck his stomach in and lean back to have an illusion of a waist>incredibly skinnytake a wild guess
>>106493026Shame he was the only castrati to make it on record because he sucks desu.
>>106493006>slsk>"site"lol fucking retard
>>106493063She still mogs your gf (if you even have on lol)
>>106493040>>106493063quick google search says filipino ladyboy, 18 years old, 5'4''
>>106493026>AllegedlyAmericans are gay btw, they can't stop thinking in dicks
>>106493133that's not how you use that acronym, but thanks for trying hard anyway
great, thread ruined
>>106493155>>106493157You will never be a real woman. You have no womb, you have no ovaries, you have no eggs. You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and surgery into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your ghoulish appearance behind closed doors.Men are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed men to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even trannies who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a man. Your bone structure is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk guy home with you, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your diseased, infected axe wound.You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you with a headstone marked with your birth name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a man is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a skeleton that is unmistakably male.This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
>>106493159Blame wagner tranny poster deviating every thread
>Why yes, I do indeed play the violin; how could you tell?
>>106492958>>106493006>>106493038>>106493142>SPOONFEED ME!>ok get this p2p it has everything you need>NOOOOO I DON'T WANT THAT!!!!!!!>fine >T-TRANNY ;_;kill yourself today, nigger
Remember, only old recording bros know what they're talking about. Everyone else obsesses over trannies and represses homosexual urges.https://youtu.be/4Zw_3aGh9a8
>>106493184because you're a soulless chink>>106493199grainy is tranny
>>106493222Awful trips, kys
Transphobes and Brahmsians OUTThis general is Wagnerian and PROUD!
>>106493175>someone wrote this in earnest before it became a copypastarent free
>>106492606Bach's prelude and fugues
>>106493301join the 40% already you schizo freak
>>106493301what's your favorite recording of Tristan & Isolde, sister?
any suggestions of where to start for getting into classical music? currently only know the famous composers that everyone has heard of, and dont really know how the Ops and numbers and stuff work for the names
>>106493333Why, Wilhelm Furtwangler's of course!
>>106493199https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL97cMr2EI4does this board has mods or something? it's tiresome
>>106485080How far back do you plan to go?
>>106493346Watch the anime Nodame Cantabile.
>>106493346Beethoven: Symphony No.5, moonlight sonataMozart: Symphony No.40, Requiem
>>106493360>SchumannGreat UwU>BrahmsGet OUT evil Brahmsian
>>106493346You'll get to know opus and numbers once you get familiar with the pieces, to get into classical the best way is to tell us what piece you like already and we can tell you what other pieces or composer you'd be more likely to enjoy
>>106493376as far as I can. I reckon Palestrina? I've already listened to all I could find by Hildegaard Von Bingen so I suppose that's the limit. Anything before that requires specialized ensembles with restored instruments and a whole lot of speculation. How far do you reckon I can go?>>106493346I'd say pick a composer you're at least somewhat familiar with, go to the wiki article on their compositions, listen to as much as you can bare and then come back to us with what you particularly liked and disliked from it. That way, also, you'll begin to become familiar with things like op numbers and also with the genres/forms within the music itself and their characteristics
>>106493360Staff have never cared about this board.https://youtu.be/J18wFaVjbPw
>>106493431>PalestrinaSorry, I was either thinking about Du Fay or Des Prez
>>106493431Perotin/Leonin/Notre Dame polyphony is probably as far as you can go (besides von Bingen but you already listened to her)If you want to be totally competitionist you can do Gregorian chant too.
>>106493431>as far as I can. I reckon PalestrinaYou should at least listen to Machaut (14th. c) and Dufay (15th. c). Forget about Hildegard. Leonin and Perotin are mere curiosities.
>>106493484>you can do Gregorian chant too.I've listened to about six hours of it by the people at Santo Domingo; I reckon that's enoughPérotin and Léonin seem like a good place to stop, then, but are recordings of their works readily available? More to the point, did they bother writing down and organising their oeuvre?>>106493497>Forget about HildegardWell, I fucking loved her stuff personally>mere curiositiesHow so?
>>106493556>How so?Little artistic worth.
Ah, so it's happened again. Looks like it's time for the smart and civilised European hours posters to depart from /classical/ with dignity, as the tranny-obsessed shitposters have returned to reply to every post with 'cope' 'seethe' 'kys' and other uncouth buzzwords. Then they're reply to themselves until the sun rises on the old continent once more.Good night.
>>106493497>origin of polyphonic Western art music>mere curiositiesActually retarded.
>>106493577Why? Was what they did not historically important/influential? Were there other composers doing the same/better stuff at the time? If it's relevant to understanding and appreciating the development of western academic music I'm listening to it, curiosity or not
Could you tell the difference between a cylindrical record and a disc record in a blind listening test?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_g4cAXkz80
>>106493657why would I bother when both sound like shit
>>106493657blind listening is for söyence faggots
>>106493595you're leaving just as we're discussing 13th-15th century composers?
>>106492414D537, 568, 575, 664, 784, 840, 845, 850 and 894 are the great ones (beside the last three).
>Renaissance anon has probably stopped posting here for a long time>no one will be here to post twinkcore vocal music recordingsTragic.
>>106492606Mozart's and Haydn's sonatas
>>106493431>as far as I can.good luck and godspeed
>>106493897where's Du Fay??>>106493959what, so none of them in that chart
>>106493897Actually never heard of any of the people before von Binden lmao. Any of the particularly notable?
>>106494009no idea, I just looked up early composers and was as surprised as you. Though I have heard of Notker the Stammerer and Alfonso X before
>>106493419>>106493431particularly interested in piano pieces rather than orchestral
>>106494068Well then I guess just limit yourself to Chopin, Valentin Alkan, Liszt, Mendelssohn, Thalberg, Czerny and Beethoven
>>106494111thanks, will definitely check all out. I'll branch out to the other stuff afterwards
>>106494068Why not bothhttps://youtu.be/NMa_S5ZPxa4
>>106494148>1959How does it sounds this good?
Anyone before Josquin is not worth remembering.>Lol, guess which note I want you to play
Any other fugues like RV 565? I find it more interesting than keyboard fugues
>>106491831he's unironically a genius
>>106494376decent but not really the sound I was looking for
Is this as hard as it looks?https://youtu.be/sEQf5lcnj_o?t=191
>>106494503>Is this as hard as it looks?>>https://youtu.be/sEQf5lcnj_o?t=191
>>106494517based tranime destroyer
>>106494137Debussy and Ravel are worth checking out as well
>>106494262>I don't like being challenged
>>106496328what the ever loving fuck
>>106496328this nigga fr?
>>106496502should i record it again?
>>106496577No. No, no no.
>>106496629i see that you understand the rhythm of the song. i have done my part
>>106496577Yes. Yes, yes yes.
>>106496657https://voca.ro/16I01feri44vit gets lower in tone for the second part
>>106496670I bet you didn't even listened to the first five seconds.
>>106496678this nigga fr?
>>106496823oh how I wish you were right
>>106496867Tell tell me what's bad about it
>>106496867Tell tell tell me what’s bad about it
>>106496867Tell tell tell tell me what’s bad about it
>>106496867Tell tell tell tell tell me what's bad about it
90% of the posts in this shit general consist of one or two sentences. Absolutely zero music discussion going on. Most of the arguments that take place here can be reduced to "Composer A > Composer B." Actually, no, they don't even have to be reduced -- they're literally just that. Worst place on the internet to talk about classical music. How do you guys manage being so terrible at this?
>>106497064please tell me the name of the song in the vocaroo
>>106496867Tell tell tell tell tell tell me what’s bad about it
>>106497064rampant shitposting destroyed /classical/
>>106497098rampant shitposting is* /classical/
>>106497088What do you get out of spamming this general with your low-effort 'kys', 'seethe', 'tranny' posts? What a pathetic life you must have. You call this humor? Well, have at it. Goodnight.
>>106497064>>106497126The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", where feed and seed both end in the sound "-eed", thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was "Formerly Chuck's", implying that the two words beginning with "F" and "S" would have ended with "-uck", rhyming with "Chuck". So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called "Chuck's Feeduck and Seeduck."
>>106497125it wasn't before coronavirusatleats not that much
>>106497126See you in an hour you needy faggot
>>106497174the language was different, for sure, but the quality has been the same since at least 2013
>>106497348No, it's definitely got worse.
>>106496914>>106496922>>106497008>>106497091this reads like a (((NYC))) school compositionlet's post good modern fugues, in honour of the brainlet who was whining about them in the previous threadhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dcdQHDsMNQ
>>106497393stop it then
>>106497413What is so bad about the NYC school composition? He wasn't jewish btw, he was of italian ancestry
>>106497413this is good outside of the first 30 seconds
What was the hottest opera singer ever?
>>106497413>Ctrl-f fugue>18 results>Ctrl-f symphony>16 results>Ctrl-f sonata>9 results>Ctrl-f concerto>6 resultswhy are you so obsessed with this highly specific composition style? even Bach wrote 80% non-fugal compositions
>What is so bad about the NYC school composition? He wasn't jewish btw, he was of italian ancestry
>>What is so bad about the NYC school composition? He wasn't jewish btw, he was of italian ancestry
https://open.spotify.com/track/50pCVVT9LXBjD37uq8uEDw?si=92de3546ba1d49d6this one is good>>106497785
>>106497739what does this mean
this board is lower quality than /qa/
>this is good outside of the first 30 seconds
>>106497912ok maybe i was wrong: >>106498034
>>106498049you're basically always wrong
>>106497739based soijaks sending noses to the oven
>>106497912/mu/ may be the worst board, but at least our general isn't as bad as guitar general.
Satie > Bach
>>106498373the nocturnes suck
>>106498373well that’s one way to announce your homosexuality
Shostakovich > Mozart
Tfw when you go from rap to jazz and finally arrive home at classical:). Ravel and samule barber all day
>>106498432Are you black?
>>106493082>Although known as ''The Angel of Rome,'' Moreschi was probably not a great singer to begin with. He certainly was not a tasteful musician; his singing is afflicted with a constant sobbing quality that he thought was expressive. The production generally is unsteady, sometimes painfully so.Explains a lot
>>106498432lol you're still not "home", nigga
>>106498432well that’s one way to announce your homosexuality
>>106498477whatever, we wouldn't have this gem without himhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfiapMYwHW4
what is the most /classical/ video game OST?
>>106498598Transylvania: Castle Of Night
>>106498598Metroid: Ocarina Of The Time
Has anyone here read Reicha's treatise "Cours de composition musicale" / "Course of Musical Composition" ?There's a free english translation on google books.I couldn't find his other writings, but I read somewhere that his "Traité de mélodie" was well respected at the time.
>>106498677I've been meaning to, but I hate reading on the internet. I don't suppose physical copies are readily available.
>>106498709The one on google books can be downloaded as a PDF so you can open it in your own viewer (I use sumatraPDF, which does the job well enough)It's an option in the gear wheel menu.
>>106498873I did say "internet", didn't I? Sorry, I meant on the computer
>>106498902Yeah it's not great. I've been thinking about getting something like a 10 inch e-reader, which would be good for stuff like this, but probably still too small for scores.10 inch readers are more than $400 though, and a 13 inch (letter size) reader that would be okay for scores is more than $800.I have a 6-inch e-reader, but it's too small for most PDFs, which is what most of this type of material is in.
>>106486170How do people remain composed like that while playing? Even recording myself playing alone gets me real nervous about making a mistake
>>106485392Definitely placing way too much importance on Rossini. He was an important composer no doubt, but not everything needs a counter proposition, given the similarity between Weber and Beethoven, and Weber being what Wagner would call a dramatic composer in both programmatic and absolute music in utter contrast to Beethoven, he would offer a much better comparison.
>>106493181Who the fuck mentioned Wagner? It's you anti-Wagnerians that have to talk about trannies all the time.