https://youtu.be/Auta2lagtw4>Paul in 1969: “It’s gonna be such a comical thing, like in 50 years time, they broke up because Yoko sat on an amp”
>>106480608film grain was softened to fuck. not watching this.
>You Can't Unhear This>It’s finally happening!! You definitely can’t unsee this - and that’s a very good thing.whats wrong with this people?
>>106480608So is this essentially a documentary /of/ the 1970 documentary Let It Be? Is there a difference here?
>>106481007It's a different documentary using the same sources. When they started Get Back neither the Beatles nor the film crew had any idea what the project actually was so they had a hard time fashioning a narrative out of footage of guys jamming, arguing and dicking around in a studio. Naturally the moments of conflict and tension were emphasized to compensate for that, and it made the whole affair seem way more miserable than it supposedly really was. Not that it was all great, but it wasn't all bad either. The selling point of this new doc is that it's supposed to be more "balanced" and complete than the original film, showing that the Beatles were still basically best lads despite their diverging egos, but there's always skepticism of whitewashing that comes with these retrospective projects. I hope Jackson and co. are true to their word.
>>106480764I'll watch it because it's never before seen footage but god damn does it visually look awful.
>>106480764>>106481517it looks fine
>>106481616Nigga this looks like a cartoon
>>106480608when i was in high school we were voting for our grad song like the song you would walk down the ailse to get your diploma when you graduated and this one chick really wanted imagine by the beatles as the song and i remember laughing and saying that the beatles suck and she looked like i killed her first born...
>>106481815What the fuck were they thinking?
>>106481827and then everyone clapped
>>106481815>>106481830Imagine not doing the chad move of exaggerating even more the film grain. Zoomers would have creamed to that.Wasnt Jackson a visual master? Stuff like the Frighteners was very nice looking, he had a particular look.
>>106481853no and then she got a scolarship to play baseball at some random college in the united states lol
>>106481815Jackson's such a fucking hack
>>106481815This looks like one of those amateur "AIs" that people on youtube use to clean up bad Hollywood vfx.
>>106481815it's just pretty soft dude i guarantee you nobody actually cares
I hope it includes footage of this based momenthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsBrNefxceQ
>>106481815fucking boomers need to get their eyes checked. too bad the people who can actually see don't really have any power/can't risk their jobs by telling jackson & co. that it looks bad.
>>106481924Jackson is one of those guys who doesn’t believe in film looking like film, which is why entrusting him with a bunch of grainy late 60s 16mm footage shot with purely environmental lighting was a bad idea
Holy shit... There's so much new material to examine... Do you know how long this will keep us Beatles autists satisfied? There's so much of it too :)
>>106482902exactly.>>106482968boomers don't care because they can't tell the difference. you can really notice the difference if you compare the new trailer with last year's teaser :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UocEGvQ10OE
>>106480764it looks amazing. go fuck yourself.
its surreal seeing old footage of these guys in such high definition. sometimes we forget that the past didnt look like the cameras that recorded it.
>>106483382wow, no wonder it looks like complete shite. the frame that made me seethe was the one where a lyric sheet was held up, and it lacked so much details you couldnt read jack shit. i fucking hate degraining, the shots look so soft and undefined now. the film grain is the literal detail in the picture, you absolute retards. a little bit is fine when done well, but this just looks insanely horrible. and then ten years later we're probably going to get a 'remaster' of the series without the degraining. lol. go fuck yourself jackson.
>>106481815>looks like a cartoon>released on disney>probably will be censoredfuck, this is so good. i can't wait to see the seethe from beatles fans :)
Somebody have a word.
>>106481815looks like those ai deepdream shit. what a garbage technology.
>>106481815>ITT: Retards who think once bad scene = entire movie bad
>>106481815it's fine, fuckin drama faggots
>>106489074its a filter applied to all the footage. you dont even know what youre talking about, shut the fuck up.
>>106489138You are the retard. Not all footage is equal.
>>106489138>it’s a “filter”Shut the fuck up zoomer, you have no clue how color correction works
>>106489109Zoom in cunt the chair blends with the background
>>106489435>>106489480ITS A DENOISING FILTER YOU OBLIVIOUS FAGGOTS. ITS NOT THE COLORS ITS THE ALGORITHMIC SOFTENING OF DETAIL, THATS WHY FAUL LOOKS MADE OF RUBBER, NO WONDER ALL YOU LISTEN TO IS NIGGER RAP YOU HAVE SHIT EARS AND OF COURSE SHIT EYES YOU CANT PERCEIVE SHIT.
>>106480608Good GOD. They all look real rough. Paul and John especially are ugly as fuck. Seeing John in color and in motion makes me sick. What an ugly creature.
>>106491874they were universal sex symbols, imagine and conjure that. televisions brainwashing power really is something else.
>>106486449Of course it will be censored. John and Yoko are junkies on heroin the whole time and Paul is a raging fat alcoholic. This is just another whitewash to show how LE EPIC AND LEGENDARY the Beatles are. Even though all the jams from this were total shit. We’ll just see some epic and totally hilarious moments XD
>>106491898I mean they looked real good in 1966, what the FUCK happened in like 2 or 3 years?
Yeah, I'm thinking they're back
>Still the best musical documentary with a beatle in itHow did they do it?
>>106492018No overarching narrative, no melodramatic bullshit, no mythologizing. Just 2 hours of great performances and funny interviews from a band at the height of their powers.
>>106481815>GRAIN!>THIS NEEDS GRAIN!>LITERALLY UNWATCHABLE WITHOUT GRAIN!
>>106491694Shut up so(y)boy
>>106481815looks almost as bad as the Ghost In The Shell 2: Innocence UHD BD
>>106491694We are turning into Wall-E world due to low standards. It's very painful to witness. This world doesn't deserve good things if this is how complacent and pathetic they are.
friendly reminder that Peter Jackson's King Kong is one of the greatest films ever made
>>106495194Post your height and BMI
>>106480608i for one am liking this funny colour/blur. it reminds me of being really high on acid or mushrooms
>>106495235>its terribly processed and destroyed the original footage, and thats a good thing!
>>106491945>real good>literal bowl cuts and short pants
>>106481155>but there's always skepticism of whitewashing that comes with these retrospective projectsShut the fuck up. What was the point of bringing that up?
>>106495268>NOOO NOT THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE
>>106495268>NOOOO YOU CANT JUST LIKE THINGS NOOOOOOOOO
>>106495221You're lucky I used the scales at the pharmacy recently5 ft 11.668.8 kgBMI: 20.8Body fat mass percentage: 18.8%
>>106480608>"Imagine all the people" by the beatles is litearlly the most shit album of ALL TIME